Medicare Rights Center

https://www.medicarerights.org/about-us

Welcome to the Medicare Rights Center

National Helpline: 800-333-4114

The Medicare Rights Center is a national, nonprofit consumer service organization that works to ensure access to affordable health care for older adults and people with disabilities through counseling and advocacy, educational programs and public policy initiatives.Since 1989, we’ve been helping people with Medicare understand their rights and benefits, navigate the Medicare system, and secure the quality health care they deserve. We’re the largest and most reliable independent source of Medicare information and assistance in the United States.

The Medicare Rights Center is committed to:

  1. Serving as a kind and expert health insurance counselor, educator, and advocate for those who need it most.
  2. Providing independent, timely, and clear information on Medicare, Medicaid for dual-eligibles, and related topics to communities nationwide.
  3. Fostering diverse partnerships and points of view.
  4. Finding lasting solutions to systemic problems that prevent older adults and people with disabilities from accessing needed health coverage and care.

Another chronic pain senior citizen shared this with me… and indicated that they can be of great assistance for those on Medicare and having trouble getting appropriate services/care.

I am going to post a link to this post on the resources tab on my blog

Chains’ Attorneys: Pharmacists, “with limited exceptions,” are bound to respect a prescribing doctor’s professional medical judgment about which medications are appropriate

Moody, pharmacy chains tangle in opioid lawsuit

https://www.news4jax.com/news/2020/02/06/moody-pharmacy-chains-tangle-in-opioid-lawsuit/

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Castigating the tactic as a “publicity stunt,” Attorney General Ashley Moody is asking a judge to reject an effort by the nation’s two largest pharmacy chains to add 500 unidentified physicians to the state’s lawsuit against the pharmaceutical industry over the opioid epidemic.

CVS Pharmacy Inc. and Walgreen Co. filed what is called a third-party complaint against 500 “John and Jane Doe” doctors, alleging that the prescribing physicians — and not the drug stores — are to blame for faulty prescriptions.

The state’s lawsuit against the chains “is nothing more than unsupported speculation” that pharmacists “filled prescriptions for opioid medications that they should not have filled” despite the state’s “inability to support its claim with even one instance of an improperly filled prescription,” the pharmacies argued in the third-party complaint filed Jan. 22. By looking at The Law Offices Of Michael H. Pham Avvo Profile, it is better to get a consultation about this issue first with them. Then, they would study the case properly and will suggest some measures to clear this case and would eventually get it done with the order obtained at the court of law.

“But pharmacists do not write prescriptions and do not decide for doctors which medications are appropriate to treat their patients,” the chains’ lawyers wrote. “While pharmacists are highly trained and licensed professionals, they did not attend medical school and are not trained as physicians. They do not examine or diagnose patients. They do not write prescriptions.”

Pharmacists, “with limited exceptions,” are “bound to respect a prescribing doctor’s professional medical judgment about which medications are appropriate to treat a particular patient under the doctor’s care,” the companies argued.

The pharmacy chains deny they are “liable in any respect.”

But responding Wednesday to the third-party complaint, lawyers representing the state accused CVS and Walgreens of having “launched a publicity stunt attempting to deflect attention from their role in causing the opioid epidemic plaguing Florida.”

“CVS and Walgreens’ gambit is factually unsupported because both pharmacies have records concerning the prescriptions that the pharmacies dispensed, including the names of the doctors who wrote the prescriptions,” the state’s lawyers wrote.

The attorney general’s office filed the lawsuit in 2018 to try to recoup millions of dollars the state has spent because of the opioid epidemic. The lawsuit was filed against manufacturers, distributors and sellers of opioids and included a series of allegations, including misrepresentation about opioid use and filling suspicious orders for drugs. The state later added CVS and Walgreens to the lengthy list of defendants in the case.

In the third-party complaint, CVS and Walgreens lawyers wrote that if the chains can be held liable for filling prescriptions, “ultimate responsibility must rest with those who wrote the prescriptions: the prescriber defendants themselves.”

The chains will amend their complaint to identify the doctors “if plaintiff (the state) ever identifies the specific prescriptions it claims should not have been filled,” they wrote.

The state’s attorneys, however, wrote that the pharmacies have records of prescriptions, including the names of the doctors who wrote the prescriptions, but they failed to identify “a single prescriber.”

The pharmacies’ “tactic” is legally groundless “because Florida law treats such John and Jane Doe filings as a nullity,” the state’s lawyers wrote, adding “such a filing does not commence a legal action against any party.”

Retail pharmacies “are the last line of defense between dangerous opioids and the public,” the state argued, accusing Walgreens and CVS of failing to fulfill their obligations to adequately review prescriptions and ensure they were “effective, valid, and issued by a practitioner for a legitimate medical purpose” as required by law. If in Festus attorneys defending against drug charges issues are available in case of a problem.

Both pharmacy chains were the target of enforcement actions related to the opioid epidemic, the state argued.

CVS “paid millions of dollars to resolve allegations of malfeasance” at one of its stores in Sanford, and Walgreens “paid millions of dollars in connection with diversion and record-keeping problems” at its Jupiter distribution center and six retail stores, Moody’s lawyers pointed out.

A Walgreens in Pasco County “sold 2.2 million tablets in Hudson alone in one year,” the state added. The lawsuit is filed in the 6th judicial district, which encompasses Pasco and Pinellas counties.

The state asked the judge to strike or sever the third-party complaint, saying the John and Jane Doe pleadings were not proper and that any attempt to litigate the third-party claims along with the state’s complaint “would be unduly cumbersome for the parties and the court.”

In the third-party complaint, the pharmacy chains said the state has not sued health-care practitioners who wrote the opioid prescriptions. Over 60 percent of the opioids dispensed in Florida did not come from the chains, they argued.

“But in a misguided hunt for deep pockets without regard to actual fault or legal liability, plaintiff has elected not to sue any of these other parties,” the pharmacies’ lawyers wrote.

The pharmacies also denied the state’s allegations that a vast number of Florida doctors wrote an excessive volume of opioid prescriptions without legitimate medical purposes.

“Perhaps unsurprisingly, the state’s lengthy amended complaint against the Florida pharmacy chains fails to identify even one prescription that was supposedly filled improperly by any pharmacist for any of the Florida pharmacy chains. Not one,” the chains said.

Pharmacists who work for the drug store chains “are among the best, most caring, and most conscientious in the business,” their lawyers argued. One can follow the link here and get a good legal expert who can stand by you and help you with your case.

“They care just as deeply about their communities as anyone else and could not take more seriously the responsibility of dispensing of controlled substances, including prescription opioid medications. At the same time, they are committed to serving the legitimate needs of patients across the community who must have access to such medications, as prescribed by their doctors for conditions that can range from pain in terminal cancer patients to severe pain after surgery to disabling chronic conditions,” they added.

American Experience The Poison Squad – PBS documentary

https://www.pbs.org/video/the-poison-squad-5sf93j/

‘The Poison Squad’ tells the story of government chemist Dr. Harvey Wiley who, determined to banish these dangerous substances from dinner tables, took on the powerful food manufacturers and their allies.

I stumbled on to this PBS show and Dr Wiley’s crusade to get the establishment of the FDA. His story starts in the late 19th century and this documentary shows how BIG CORPORATIONS had many/most of Congress in their pocket and Congress resisted taking correcting action against those corporations who was using all sorts of “bad preservatives” in food and even gets to dealing with the “Caffeine addiction” from Coca Cola products.

Take away is that Congress has not changed much over the 19th-20th-21st centuries … lobbyists and $$$ rule the day !

unnecessary shots made patients’ pain worse or led to adverse conditions, including open holes in the back

Neurologist found guilty in $150M fraud scheme alongside 3 other physicians

https://www.beckersspine.com/spine/item/48190-neurologist-found-guilty-in-150m-fraud-scheme-alongside-3-other-physicians.html

A federal jury convicted neurologist Mohammed Zahoor, MD, and three other physicians of participating in a $150 million healthcare fraud scheme, the Department of Justice announced Feb. 4.

The four-week trial also culminated in convictions for Michigan pulmonologist Tariq Omar, MD, and emergency medicine specialists Spilios Pappas, MD, and Joseph Betro, DO, of Ohio and Michigan, respectively.

While working at several Tri-County Group medical clinics in Michigan and Ohio from 2008-16, Drs. Zahoor, Omar, Pappas and Betro allegedly required patients to receive expensive, medically unnecessary services such as facet joint injections and urinary drug screens in order to obtain prescriptions for opioids, benzodiazepines and other narcotics.

Patients who told the physicians they didn’t “want, need or benefit from” the expensive, unnecessary injections were denied prescriptions until they agreed to have them.

The defendants prescribed over 6.6 million doses of opioids and regularly offered patients 30 milligrams of oxycodone, a dosage only deemed suitable for terminally ill cancer patients. Some of their patients suffered from legitimate pain, and others were drug dealers or opioid addicts. In certain cases, the unnecessary shots made patients’ pain worse or led to adverse conditions, including open holes in the back.

In an “assembly line” type operation, the four physicians would see dozens of patients during shifts ranging from two to four hours, prosecutors said. The defendants were paid up to $3,500 an hour by falsely representing medical necessity and exaggerating time spent with patients on Medicare claims.

The physicians were also involved in a scheme to send urine tests for every patient to National Laboratories, a business owned by a co-conspirator, in exchange for tens of thousands of dollars in illegal kickbacks.

The physicians’ sentencing hearings are scheduled for July. Each was found guilty of one count of healthcare fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud and wire fraud. Previously, 17 other defendants, including eight physicians, pleaded guilty in connection with the case.

Doctor would not give individuals their pain medication … unless they capitulated in having an epidural

So here we have two examples – one of the DOJ going after “needle jockeys” and the other getting sued for refusing to give oral opiates to pts unless they submitted to on going ESI’s.

The first case, whatever valid chronic pain pts there was in the practice are once again “tossed to the curb” and will most likely be shunned by other prescribers because they were a pt at that “dirty practice” that got taken down by the feds.

The second, I have not heard anything about any resolution, but it could have been settled with a confidentiality agreement and it may have just “faded away” never to be heard from again.

I have been saying for several years … that the potential solution to the problems that the chronic painers have in getting adequate pain management will be based on actions taken in our court system over the next few years.

Conway states at around 17:00 + that chronic pain pts that need opiates – THEY WILL BE THERE !!!

Conway states in the video about 17+ minutes into it: pain pt when they need opiates – THEY WILL BE THERE !

Is it time for those in the chronic pain community to start tweeting white house, conway and trump when chronic pain pts are DENIED THEIR MEDICALLY NECESSARY OPIATES.

Include a link to the video in your tweet  https://www.wtxl.com/news/national/kellyanne-conway-to-provide-update-on-white-house-effort-to-fight-opioid-abuse

we all know that there is no longer enough opiate production to provide adequate pain management for the vast majority of chronic pain pts.

Of course Conway is another ATTORNEY and part of the same DOJ/DEA “industry”.  There is a old attorney saying… “… when the law is on your side argue the law.. when the facts in on your side, argue the facts … if neither the law nor the facts is on your side … deny…deny…deny…”

It would appear the Conway is using the THIRD OPTION in defending the administrations position… deny… deny… deny that any chronic pain pts are being harmed by the administration’s policies

 

CDC Guidelines – based on CRAPPY DATA ?

who believes that a “tail can wag a dog”

I have recently seen a lot of discussion about states that are considering or others that have pass STATE LAW that is suppose to help chronic pain pts get better/adequate pain management.  Encourage prescribers to be more liberal in prescribing opiates and other controlled meds that are needed by pts that are medically dealing with subjective diseases ( pain, anxiety, depression, ADD/ADHD, mental health issues ).

I am not aware of the authority of any state to establish boundaries for any federal agency – especially DOJ/DEA – enter the state and forced to observe/adhere to state laws.

I wish someone would point out to me where a STATE LAW could supersede the DEA’s authority under the Control Substance Act.

In fact, the DEA has been granted – or took – the authority to both be able to establish new interpretations/regulations of existing laws and then proceed to enforce those same regulations.  It is almost like the DEA can create “designer regulations” to meet their specific wants to enforce.

All one has to do is look at California who made MJ legal some 20 yrs ago and the DEA still -at times – raids MJ clinics and MJ growing patches.

The DEA might even take it as a challenge to the states that pass some sort of new legislation that encourages better pain management and just raid more practices to just prove who is really in charge.

AHRQ Comment period: Mixed Methods Review: Integrating Palliative Care With Chronic Disease Management in Ambulatory Care

Background and Objectives”

“Most care for patients with serious life-threatening chronic illness or conditions occurs in ambulatory settings. Care for these patients can be complex, as they often face high symptom burden and decreased quality of life. Research has shown that patients and caregivers appreciate the integration of serious illness care into primary care.1,2 Palliative care is defined as “care, services, or programs for patients with serious life-threatening illness and their caregivers, with the primary intent of relieving suffering and improving health-related quality of life, including dimensions of physical, psychological/ emotional, social, and spiritual well-being.”3 Importantly, palliative care approaches are not based on prognosis and can be beneficial throughout the course of serious illness, not just at the end of life. Populations with serious life-threatening chronic illness of key interest for palliative care include, but are not limited to, those with advanced heart failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV), advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria III or IV), end-stage renal disease (on dialysis or choosing not to have dialysis and age 75 or older), and those with frailty or multiple serious chronic conditions.4 Cancer is also a key area of interest for palliative care, but given the large existing research base and existing systematic reviews about integrating palliative care into ambulatory oncology, this review will focus on other illnesses and conditions where more insights are needed.

https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/webform/products/palliative-care-integration/submit-sead

Dr. Thomas Kline, MD, PhD: Myth 14: Benzodiazapines will addict and kill you

Valium related drugs, or benzos, are an especially drug for treating seizures, comas, and anxiety. attempts to demonize benzos are underway. the medical text do not support the dangers claimed. We do not recommend tapering unless previous shown genetic addiction of opioids or benzos.

C50 is proudly hosting a Meet & Greet/conference: February 7th from 12-4pm: Olympia, WA

https://www.facebook.com/2011191425805198/posts/2528180017439667/

The C50 is proudly hosting a Meet & Greet/conference in the Columbia room at Washington State Capitol Building. The topic: Effects of Opioid Prescribing Policy on the Opioid Crisis February 7th from 12-4pm  Olympia, WA

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/effects-of-opioid-prescribing-policy-tickets-92395524501