conspiracies against wellness show

https://www.conspiraciesagainstwellness.com/

Chronic pain in the elderly: Mostly all in the head ?

Psychological Interventions Beneficial for Chronic Pain in Older Adults

https://www.clinicaladvisor.com/pain-information-center/psychological-interventions-for-chronic-pain-treatment/article/767105/

Patients with noncancer chronic pain can benefit from psychological interventions, according to a study published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

Bahar Niknejad, MD, of the Department of Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfolk, and associates conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to understand if older adults with chronic pain would benefit from psychological therapies and the effectiveness of such treatments.

The main outcome studied was pain intensity, with secondary outcomes including pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, worsening beliefs, self-efficacy for pain management, physical function, and health.

The investigators examined 22 studies involving 2608 volunteers (69% women; average age, 71.9 years). Average differences were standardized and recorded for pain intensity (dD=-0.181), pain interference (dD=-0.133), depressive symptoms (dD=-0.128), anxiety (dD=-0.205), worsening beliefs (dD=-0.184), self-efficacy (dD=-0.193), physical function (dD=0.006), and physical health (dD=0.160) at posttreatment.

The only category with evidence of persisting effects after posttreatment analysis was pain (dD=-0.251).

“Psychological interventions for the treatment of chronic pain in older adults have small benefits, including reducing pain and catastrophizing beliefs and improving pain self-efficacy for managing pain,” the authors reported.

“These results were strongest when delivered using group-based approaches. Research is needed to develop and test strategies that enhance the efficacy of psychological approaches and sustainability of treatment effects among older adults with chronic pain,” they concluded. 

Florida is a sicker state because of Gov. Rick Scott’s partisanship

Florida is a sicker state because of Gov. Rick Scott’s partisanship

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/fl-op-column-randy-schultz-florida-health-care-rick-scott-20180529-story.html

In a new Senate ad, Gov. Rick Scott claims that voters must send business executives like himself to Washington. “If you’re not getting the results, you’re not in business.”

So let’s look at Scott’s results as governor on health care in Florida.

They stink.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention just reported that the rate of Floridians without health insurance rose again last year, to 20.1 percent from 19.8 percent. Since Scott took office in 2011, Florida has ranked near the bottom on access to basic health coverage.

It gets worse. The Commonwealth Fund just ranked Florida above only Louisiana, Oklahoma and Mississippi, based on a study of 43 health care metrics. Commonwealth ranked Florida below average in the South, which was by far the worst region.

Florida fared a little better in the new report from the Institute for Women’s Policy Research. Mortality rates among women for breast cancer, lung cancer and heart disease have declined. So has the number of women diagnosed with AIDS.

The report also noted, however, that “Florida ranks poorly on a cluster of data points related to women’s mental health — suicide mortality, average number of days per month of poor mental health, and average number of days per month that women have limited activity due to poor mental or physical health.” More women need “adequate access to preventive care.”

Only education consumes a larger share of the state budget than health care. Education and health care thus should be among any governor’s priorities. Education isn’t a Scott priority. Nor is health care for the man whose hospital company paid a $1.7 billion fine for defrauding the federal government.

The main reason for Florida’s poor performance is that Scott has refused to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. Though Scott expressed support for Medicaid expansion in 2013, he quickly backed off. Two years later, he sided with the Florida House against a Senate proposal that could have provided coverage for about 800,000 of the state’s working poor.

Every credible survey has shown that Medicaid expansion benefits those who obtain coverage and the states themselves. The Kaiser Family Foundation found that the roughly 15 million new Medicaid enrollees nationwide had fewer out-of-pocket medical expenses, lower medical debt and better credit. They also were less likely to face bankruptcy.

Unlike Scott, other Republican governors and legislatures have looked past their party’s opposition to the Affordable Care Act and focused on helping their states. Under GOP leadership — notably Gov. John Kasich — Ohio expanded Medicaid. Among enrollees, Kaiser reported, 50 percent no longer have any medical debt. Providers in Ohio have had to eat less in uncompensated care.

Medicaid expansion began in January 2014. In upholding most of the Affordable Care Act, the Supreme Court made expansion a state option, not a requirement. The federal government paid 100 percent of states’ expansion costs for three years. It’s now 95 percent and will be phased in to 90 percent by 2020.

So Scott and Republican leaders in Tallahassee have passed on many billions that could have improved lives, boosted Florida’s economy and made the state’s health care system better. That 2015 Senate plan to expand Medicaid included Republican favorites such as work requirements and co-pays by recipients. Expansion would have ended if federal reimbursement fell below 90 percent.

Yet the governor who stresses “results” has chosen politics and ideology — he opposed the ACA as a private citizen — over policy. Scott also ignores what Kaiser determines to be 202 studies refuting criticisms that Medicaid expansion limits access and provides poor care.

Scott might have a defense if he had offered any alternative to Medicaid expansion. But his only health care initiative was the hospital commission he formed in 2015. He did that to distract from his administration’s incompetence that nearly cost Florida federal money for hospitals that treat the uninsured.

Under Scott, Florida did lead the nation in one health care category — rate of new AIDS infections. That came after Scott had cut public health budgets for several years. The Scott administration responded by “revising” the number of new cases downward.

With more Floridians living paycheck to paycheck, health coverage becomes vital to keeping them stable. Scott has had nearly eight years to work on this issue. The results speak for themselves.

Randy Schultz’s email address is randy@bocamag.com.

collateral damage from the WAR ON DRUGS

How many of 50,000/yr suicides are caused by this civil/social war ?

Data that the DEA wishes that no one ever see ?

Is This A Treatment For The Opioid Crisis The DEA Doesn’t Want You To Know About?

Is This A Treatment For The Opioid Crisis The DEA Doesn’t Want You To Know About?

DEA gives some of Pfizer’s injected narcotics allotment to competitors as production issues intensify shortages

https://www.fiercepharma.com/manufacturing/dea-gives-some-pfizer-s-injected-narcotic-allotment-to-competitors-to-alleviate

Pfizer, the largest U.S. producer of injected narcotics, said Wednesday it has resumed production of some of the prefilled syringes that have been in short supply and expects to have the first shipments to wholesalers in July.

But Pfizer will have a smaller allotment to send after the DEA recently gave some of its narcotics quota to competitors because of ongoing problems that have left hospitals scrambling and Pfizer unable to meet demand.

Over the last year, a series of manufacturing issues at Pfizer have exacerbated a shortage of hospital-administered painkillers. With pressure building from healthcare providers, the DEA—which controls narcotics quotas—took steps to fix the situation.

Last month, the agency asked Pfizer to surrender some of its narcotics allocation, then turned around and gave the valuable supply allotments to three other drugmakers that could actually produce the essential drugs.  

Without naming Pfizer, the DEA said in an announcement explaining its action that the largest U.S. manufacturer of the injectables had to slow production of the drugs while it made “required upgrades” to its McPherson, Kansas, plant where the drugs are made and filled. It said the company voluntarily surrendered a portion of its allotment, which the DEA reallocated to three other drug companies.

Pfizer acknowledged Wednesday it was the subject of the action, saying that after it was notified by the DEA, it reassessed how much product it was likely to produce this year and “responded quickly to relinquish some of our DEA API allocation.”

One of the companies to get the extra allotment is West-Ward, which in an email confirmed it had gotten some but not nearly enough.

“In the U.S., there is currently a shortage of injectable opioids used in hospitals for the management of pain, due to the dominant supplier in the market temporarily ceasing manufacturing,” West-Ward said in a statement. “We, and the manufacturers who remain in the marketplace, are trying to make up for a nearly 60% drop in supply that is currently affecting patient care.”

“While the DEA recently granted some additional quota for us to purchase the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), we continue to submit requests for further quota to meet our customer needs,” the company said.

The shortage of these hospital-administered pain medications, including morphine and fentanyl, started a year ago when Pfizer reduced output of prefilled syringes as part of an upgrade at its troubled sterile drug manufacturing site in McPherson, Kansas. Last fall, Pfizer told customers that because upgrades were taking longer than expected, “full recovery dates of prioritized prefilled syringes” had moved to Q1 2019 and deprioritized syringes to Q2 2019.  

Then earlier this year, the problem worsened when the contractor that makes a key component of the Carpuject and iSecure injectors Pfizer uses with those drugs ran into its own production issue. To ensure safety, Pfizer said it had to put a quality hold on the injectors, again interrupting production.

The company said that it has been working closely with its supplier to fix the “root cause” of the injector problem and get a handle on the impact on its existing inventory and product supply moving forward. Additionally, Pfizer said it is “exploring the feasibility of increasing capacity within the global Pfizer manufacturing network and potential third party suppliers.”

Wednesday Pfizer spokesman Steven Danehy said in an email that the company has resumed production of its Carpuject prefilled syringes and that the first shipments are expected to reach wholesalers in July 2018, “and we will work to expedite the process where possible.”

“We recognize the importance of these medications to patients and physicians and are committed to resolving these shortages as quickly as possible. We continue to work toward full recovery across the opioids product line in 1Q – 2Q 2019.”

Medical care .. rationed by corporate policies and bottom line ?

Another close friend of mine with an uncurable chronic condition also had Walmart refuse her pain medication after going to that exact pharmacy 2 years! I refuse to go go Walmart, CVS or anywhere that will hurt me or other pain patients. I contacted Walmart and will again on Monday. I’m calling the corporate complaint number. There are too many suicides over scared doctors and now we have to deal with judgemental businesses!
Here’s what was shared:
Found out a couple of weeks ago that my husband has cancer. Today I had a fight with the walmart pharmacist on the phone because “they” didn’t want to fill the full prescription of liquid hydocodone. I asked who “they” were that know so much better than my husband’s doctor. She said it was Walmart’s policy. I said The man has cancer & cries every time he tries to swallow! Oh, she didn’t know he had cancer, that changes everything.

She called his doctor to verify the diagnosis. My son wrote this as his status after my pit bull fight with the pharmacist. He put it into words I could never find.
“My dad has cancer. Possibly 2 types of cancer. Rant follows:
There is some truly messed up stuff going on in this country. People were shouted down when they made comments about “death panels” in relation to Obamacare. That’s where a licensed medical doctor and all the knowledge and experience they’ve gained, studied and paid for are overruled by a group of people with no medical training or certification. Let that sink in. A licensed person with intimate knowledge of your medical history and condition orders a test or procedure in your best interest. Well, some panel at an insurance company somewhere decides that you don’t need that test or procedure because it’s too expensive and your doctor must have had a lapse in judgement and didn’t order the cheaper tests first. Even though those tests won’t show what your doctor needs to know to effectively treat you. So when my father’s doctor ordered a PET scan, of course the insurance company balked. Fast forward through an arduous 3 months of daily fighting with the insurance company, useless tests and back and forths with the doctors office and the random person of the day at the insurance company as to who’s lying when they say the appropriate paperwork hasn’t been correctly filled out and submitted, dad finally gets the PET scan. Guess what? That educated, licensed medical doctor was right. It’s cancer. Cancer that’s been allowed to grow unchecked for 3 months with all the added stress of everything listed above.

Fast forward to today:

Dad had a biopsy on a spot in his throat. It’s cancer too. The man can’t swallow now. Reduced to tears every time he takes a pill or tries to stay hydrated because I won’t let him run that risk. The doctor gives a prescription for a liquid – wait for it – opioid. That’s right. We have an opioid “epidemic” in this country and we all know that just one taste of a medically prescribed pill for a legitimate reason will reduce you to a heroin addict overnight. We must protect you from yourself. And in that light,

Walmart has a policy about just how much of that opioid you can have. Again, your doctor must have had a lapse of judgement and almost condemned you to a life of shooting heroin. But here comes Walmart to the rescue! They know what’s best for you.

Ignore your doctor and his uneducated, misguided ways. During an argument with the pharmacy it slips that dad is a cancer patient. Walmart immediately back pedals. “Oh! We didn’t know he was a cancer patient! That changes everything.” Well no shit you didn’t know! You’re not a medical professional with a right to that information according to HIPPA. How does that knowledge change anything? Oh because Walmart’s policy allows them to fill the full prescription for cancer patients. But the rest of you opioid dependent, heroin overdose waiting to happen people can only have what Walmart thinks you need.”

 

Medicare compounds the (Opiate) epidemic by funding needed opioids that can be abused

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2018/05/25/unseen-face-of-the-opioid-epidemic-drug-abuse-among-the-elderly-grows/

The face of the nation’s opioid epidemic increasingly is gray and wrinkled.

But that face often is overlooked in a crisis that frequently focuses on the young.

Consider this: While opioid abuse declined in younger groups between 2002 and 2014, even sharply among those 18 to 25 years old, the epidemic almost doubled among Americans over age 50, according to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

Because of information like that, the Senate Special Committee on Aging convened a hearing Wednesday on opioid misuse by the elderly.

“Older Americans are among those unseen in this epidemic,” said Sen. Robert P. Casey Jr. (Pa.), the top Democrat on the panel. “In 2016, one in three people with a Medicare prescription drug plan received an opioid prescription. This puts baby boomers and our oldest generation at great risk.”

Unwittingly, Medicare compounds the epidemic by funding needed opioids that can be abused, but, generally, not funding the care and medicines needed to fight opioid addiction.

“Overall, one in three older Americans with Medicare drug coverage are prescribed opioid painkillers. However, while Medicare pays for opioid painkillers, Medicare does not pay for drug and alcohol treatment in most instances, nor does it pay for all of the medications that are used to help people in the treatment and recovery process,” William B. Stauffer, executive director of the Pennsylvania Recovery Organizations Alliance, in Harrisburg, Pa., said at the hearing. “Methadone, specifically, is a medication that is not covered by Medicare to treat opioid use conditions.”

Offering scary statistics and practices involving older folks, Gary Cantrell, a deputy inspector general at the Department of Health and Human Services, said “our nation is in the midst of an unprecedented opioid epidemic.”

He focused on Medicare Part D beneficiaries. Part D is the prescription drug section of Medicare, the government health insurance program covering older people. About a half-million Part D recipients “received high amounts of opioids” in 2016, Cantrell said. Almost 20 percent of that group are at “serious risk of opioid misuse or overdose,” he warned, placing the high risk in two categories — those receiving “extreme amounts of opioids” and some “who appeared to be ‘doctor shopping.’ ”

Doctor shoppers “each received high amounts of opioids and had four or more prescribers and four or more pharmacies for opioids,” Cantrell explained. “While some of these beneficiaries may not have been doctor shopping, receiving opioids from multiple prescribers and multiple pharmacies may still pose dangers from lack of coordinated care. Typically, beneficiaries who receive opioids have just one prescriber and one pharmacy.”

Many elderly get hooked on opiates through prescriptions, rather than street drugs like heroin.

“Older adults are at high risk for medication misuse due to conditions like pain, sleep disorders/insomnia, and anxiety that commonly occur in this population,” said Stauffer, who is in long-term recovery. “They are more likely to receive prescriptions for psychoactive medications with misuse potential, such as opioid analgesics for pain and central nervous system depressants like benzodiazepines for sleep disorders and anxiety. One study found that up to 11 percent of women older than age 60 misuse prescription medications. The combination of alcohol and medication misuse has been estimated to affect up to 19 percent of older Americans.”

Sixty-one-year-old Denise Holden is in long-term recovery, too, but she became addicted as a young woman seeking a heroin high. She’s been in recovery for almost 25 years, after first using drugs when she was 19. She got clean, then relapsed, as is common, then got clean again. Staying that way, even after decades clean, is not easy.

“I recently had back surgery,” the West Melbourne, Fla., resident said in an interview. “I had a spinal fusion and so I had been taking opiates for a period of time. You know, the older we get the more aches and pains we get. … We injure ourselves, we have surgeries. So, for people in recovery it’s a slippery slope because when you reintroduce that opiate to your system, your mind starts playing all kinds of tricks on you — ‘Oh you should take more, oh you should take less, oh you should throw them out. Oh no, take them all at once.’ It’s very difficult, like it’s a mind game. It is very challenging I would say, but it’s not impossible.”

Holden urged seniors to take medicines only as prescribed, and if they have suffered drug abuse to “work a very strong program of recovery.”

Addiction isn’t the only risk with opioids. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), chairwoman of the committee, said, “Older adults taking opioids are also four to five times more likely to fall than those taking nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs.”

That points to a vicious cycle. Taking opioids can lead to falls, falls can lead to pain, pain can lead to opioids and opioids can be abused. On top of that, doctors might not even realize the source of an elderly patient’s problem.

“Regrettably,” Collins added, “health-care providers sometimes miss substance abuse among older adults, as the symptoms can be similar to depression or dementia.”