Opioid laws hit physicians, patients in unintended ways

Opioid laws hit physicians, patients in unintended ways

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20180730/NEWS/180739995

New state laws on opioids intended to save lives have physicians complaining about unintended consequences.

None of the doctors interviewed by Crain’s objected to the laws’ intent: Reducing misuse of the powerful painkillers that have contributed to rising deaths and addictions.

But they say regulations have added unnecessary administrative headaches, led to a climate of fear for doctors and left patients unable to get medications when they really need them.

Doctors also say some health insurers are using the laws to inappropriately deny or delay prescriptions, sometimes even for patients with cancer and terminal illness. Some pharmacists are also making it harder to get prescriptions filled in ways that go beyond the law, the physicians say.

A number of doctors told Crain’s they have voluntarily limited the number of opioid prescriptions they write for patients because they fear they might be arrested or disciplined for overprescribing. One physician gave up his DEA license because he didn’t want to learn all the new rules or risk breaking the law.

 

Betty Chu, M.D., president of the Michigan State Medical SocietyBetty Chu, M.D., president of the Michigan State Medical Society
Doctors who include Betty Chu, M.D., president of the Michigan State Medical Society, and Chris Bush, M.D., a family practice physician in Riverview affiliated with Henry Ford Health System, say legislators and the state Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs need to listen to doctors and correct the problems.

“We are hoping that LARA (and legislators) work with us and multiple other stakeholders to fix the laws and improve stakeholders’ goals: reducing deaths and improve patients’ health,” Chu said.

Kim Gaedeke, deputy director with LARA, said the department is working with providers to address problems.

“There also is misunderstanding with these laws,” said Gaedeke, adding: “The message has been really been letting providers know we are all in it together. We have a mutual mission, including our law enforcement partners, to protect health and welfare of citizens.”

Gaedeke said LARA issued an online fact sheet earlier this month to answer some physician and pharmacist questions and address unintended effects related to pharmacies and health insurers.

One big concern is that laws making it more difficult to get prescription drugs could be pushing addicts and some patients into buying heroin or other drugs on the street, Chu and Bush agree.

And that includes black-market prescription drugs. Because prescription drugs for chronic diseases such as diabetes cost so much, some normally law-abiding patients sell their opioid prescriptions to be able to buy insulin or even food, doctors and state officials tell Crain’s.

As a result, the number of deaths and addictions hasn’t appreciably changed the past several years in Michigan, physicians and state officials say.

Nationally, more than 115 people die per day of opioid overdoses. Prescription opioids are powerful pain-reducing medications such as Vicodin or morphine. Illegal opioids include heroin, illegally produced fentanyl and an array of synthetic substances.

In Michigan, opioid deaths and overdoses rank 18th-highest in the nation. In 2016, 2,356 people died of drug overdoses, about six per day, more deaths than from car accidents.

Many health systems are prescribing fewer opioids. It’s less clear that has done anything to slow the epidemic.

While Chu said she hasn’t seen any data showing reduced deaths, Henry Ford Health has tracked a 40 percent reduction in opioid prescriptions the past five years. Chu is vice president of medical affairs at Henry Ford West Bloomfield Hospital.

“Deaths have not gone down, because of the issue of illicit drugs,” Chu said. “As prescribing has gone down, people still deal with pain.”

Chu said more discussion needs to be directed to non-pharmacy pain resources to help patients. “It’s not like people don’t have pain anymore. They do. There are patients who need something. We as doctors are not just responsible for managing opioid prescriptions, but to manage patient care and pain.”

But Chu said over the past several months the medical society has been getting “a ton of feedback” from physicians and patients about the negative effects of the new laws.

“We are hearing a lot from (doctors) about patients who are suffering because of the laws. We recognize the pressure the legislature had to do something, but … some of the provisions have been very challenging,” Chu said.

State Sen. Mike Shirkey, chairman of the Senate health policy committee, said the Legislature will look at tweaking the bills to fix any problems.

“We have to be patient and avoid reacting to resistance to change versus resistance to unnecessary or non-value-adding regulation,” Shirkey said.

 

Provider conflicts

Chris Bush, M.D., a family practice physician in Riverview affiliated with Henry Ford Health SystemChris Bush, M.D., a family practice physician in Riverview affiliated with Henry Ford Health System
Bush said doctors have told him the new opioid laws are creating additional conflict between prescribers, pharmacists and health insurance companies over correct dosages.

“The bills are mostly good, but legislators took a heavy-handed approach to the crisis, and the result may not have a big effect on opioid” deaths and addictions, Bush said.

For example, one patient who is also a physician, who asked for anonymity, was prescribed a seven-day supply of the painkiller Norco from her doctor, 28 pills. However, the health insurer denied the prescription for 28 pills and allowed only 20 to be filled. The insurer had recently changed its policy to limit opioid prescriptions for acute pain to five days, even though the laws allow for seven.

“How did the pharmacist know it was for acute pain and not chronic pain?” the physician-patient said. “The bottle wasn’t marked.”

“When I challenged with the fact that the state law now gives pharmacists the ability to do split opioid prescriptions, he said that wasn’t what” the pharmacy does, the physician-patient said. “Clearly, (the pharmacy) is making money.”

Beginning March 27, Michigan law allows pharmacists to fill Schedule 2 controlled substances in increments to avoid making the patient go back to the doctor.

Dianne Malburg, COO of the Michigan Pharmacists Association, said there is confusion with some of the opioid laws between doctors and pharmacists. She said common questions from pharmacies range from whether to allow partial refills and whether the prescription was intended for acute or chronic pain.

“We have heard some physicians write two scripts for patients and predate them so patients don’t have to go back again,” Malburg said.

On partial refills, Malburg said patients can’t get the whole prescription filled the same day if there is a limit from the health insurer or state law. “They can come back and get the remainder” when the initial fill has run out, she said.

Pharmacists are concerned they might not know if a prescription is for acute or chronic pain, Malburg said. State law limits opioids to a seven-day supply for acute pain, but prescriptions for chronic pain can be longer.

 

Problems with limits

Beginning June 1, Public Act 248 of 2017 requires physicians who want to issue a prescription for more than three days to first check with the Michigan Automated Prescription System, the state’s online database that houses information on prescriptions for opioid and other controlled substances. The act excludes prescriptions written for a patient in a hospital or ambulatory surgery center.

Fred Van Alstine, M.D., a family physician in Traverse City who specializes in palliative care and is a hospice medical director, said there also should be exceptions in opioid laws for hospice patients and those in palliative care who are dying.

“This was a solution looking for a problem. … It is an administrative burden because our patients are end of life and they need” opioids to control pain, Van Alstine said.

James Forshee, M.D., Priority Health’s chief medical officer, said his company’s prior-authorization rules on opioids exempt patients in palliative care, hospice or in cancer treatment.

“The whole effort of the law is to reduce opioid use, prevent addiction, misuse and abuse,” Forshee said. “That is not an issue with palliative care and hospice treatment. Pain control is the primary purpose.”

Bush said the opioid laws’ blanket restrictions illustrates the quandary physicians sometimes face when they must fill a pain prescription for a major broken limb, when a patient has been discharged after a surgery or has another serious condition.

For example, say the doctor writes a prescription for a seven-day supply on a Monday and the pharmacist or health insurer instead limits the prescription to five days.

“The patient runs out Friday evening, and since no one can ever find their primary physicians on a weekend, the hurting patient goes to the ER, where they will not provide that person with another prescription because they did not take care of the initial problem,” the physician-patient said. “In the end, the poor patient suffers. But the doctor can get two office visits from this and the pharmacy gets two different prescriptions plus markup.”

Chu said there have been reported conflicts between pharmacists and doctors that need to be worked out.

“We passed laws to punish (offenders), but patients have chronic pain and a lot are feeling like they are criminals now” when they fill their prescription, she said.

Elizabeth Pionk, D.O., a hospitalist physician at McLaren Bay Region hospital in Bay City, said the laws have also created problems for doctors at hospitals.

“Our hospitalist group has agreed to discharge patients with two or three days of medicine, but sometimes it is difficult for patients to get a refill after they are discharged before two or three days,” said Pionk, who also is on the foundation board for the Michigan Academy of Family Physicians.

Doctors fear giving opioids to patients for more than three days because of the laws in place, Pionk said.

But that means patients who run out of pain medications will sometimes show up in the emergency room, which won’t give them medications. “The acute pain issue is a difficult one,” she said.

Shirkey acknowledged there is a problem, a “gray area between acute and chronic pain (in the bills) … and the limitations on number of doses per script.”

For example, Shirkey said, physicians may need to be able to give a patient pain medication for more than seven days if they know the patient “need(s) back surgery but cannot get into a specialist for weeks,” he said.

The medical society has received a number of other complaints about the opioid laws from patients. Among them was a patient whose doctor would no longer prescribe pain medications and sent her to a pain clinic, but the pain clinic was booked for weeks because of the new law, Chu said.

Rural Michigan faces problems as well.

Loretta Leja, M.D., a family physician in solo practice in Cheboygan, said shortages of doctors in rural northern Michigan cause people to travel hundreds of miles for primary care and surgeries. Sometimes they run out of pain medications before they can get a doctor to refill.

“I had a patient who was having major surgery downstate, and her doctor told her she could get seven days of pain medication and to come back and see him after three weeks” for a follow-up appointment, said Leja, who is chairman of the Michigan Academy of Family Physicians. “She was worried because what do you do for two weeks with no pain meds?”

Mary Marshall, M.D., a solo practicing family physician in Grand Blanc, said a growing number of her patients are coming to her when they run out of pain pills after they have had same-day surgery.

“For whatever reason the physicians or physician assistants don’t want to write more than a three-day supply of pain medications. The problem is the patient runs out,” said Marshall, who also is president of the Michigan Academy of Family Physicians.

Marshall said pharmacists and health insurers also are questioning more pain prescriptions.

“I prescribed Norco, a common opioid, and the question came up, and you have to stop what you are doing and submit information to the insurance company,” said Marshall.

The laws, and policies from pharmacies and health insurers often don’t match up, she said. “It is such a tangled web.”

Van Alstine said health insurers have used the opioid laws to deny prescriptions for palliative care patients.

“Most hospice patients receive 14-day supplies. The prior authorization process is a nightmare. Insurers are using (the laws) as an excuse to deny,” he said. “Before it was a problem, but it became more acute after the laws passed.”

For example, Van Alstine said recently he had a terminally ill patient discharged from a hospital, and he wanted to prescribe a 14-day supply of oxycontin. The pharmacist called to let him know the health insurer had denied the prescription.

“I spent four hours on a Saturday trying to get him access to medications” for pain related to liver cancer, Van Alstine said. “I filed a complaint with the insurance commissioner on Monday. They got involved and the situation was resolved, but the guy died 24 hours later. He was in pain for days before.”

Some health insurers and pharmacists have over-interpreted the laws, Chu said. “(Some health insurers) will probably use it as an opportunity to decrease utilization,” she said.

Gaedeke said she is unaware that health insurers and pharmacists are rejecting prescriptions from doctors. “They may require more visits (by patients), but we were told the laws don’t require additional visits for pain medications,” she said. “Some (pharmacists) are thinking the seven-day supply for acute pain applies for chronic pain. There is some confusion there.”

Forshee said he knows there has been confusion among physicians. Last year, Priority Health implemented new policies, which are less stringent than the state laws, that eliminated 90-day prescriptions for opioids, and limited prescription coverage to 30 days for long-acting opioids and 15 days for short-acting opioids.

“We saw there was a problem and put in requirements” that reduce the number of opioids prescribed, creates care management plans and offers additional behavioral health and medication management support, Forshee said.

Over the next three years, Priority projects a 25 percent reduction the number of prescribed opioids, Forshee said. He said the company will take another look at its policies later this year after it reviews data.

“We work closely and talk with primary care physicians, specialists like surgeons and pain-management specialists and groups to make sure our policies are based on science and evidence,” he said.

Fear of discipline

In early July, Detroit physician Zeyn Nez Seabron became one of about 53 doctors or pharmacists suspended or otherwise disciplined for overprescribing controlled substances, according to LARA.

LARA’s complaint stated that during nine months in 2017 and 2018, Seabron was a top prescriber of oxycodone and oxymorphone, both commonly abused opioids.

Forshee said he can understand why doctors might hesitate to prescribe for fear of “gotcha” investigations and discipline.

But Gaedeke said LARA hopes over time the new opioid laws will help reduce the number of disciplinary actions taken against prescribers.

“Our goal is to go after the worst of the worst. Those blatantly prescribing, violating laws and causing deaths,” Gaedeke said.

Chu supports the intent of LARA’s crackdown. “It has been too easy to get prescriptions, but we don’t want to make it too difficult for legitimate purposes,” she said.

Opioid laws hit physicians, patients in unintended ways” originally appeared in Crain’s Detroit Business.

From Canada: ‘He wasn’t ready to go’: Callous medical care as man cries in pain haunts family – Nat Health Ins at its finest ?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/greg-garnett-aortic-dissection-delayed-diagnosis-1.4762647

The late Greg Garnett was bullied, kicked and misdiagnosed after he suffered searing chest pain, wife says

Greg Garnett knew something wasn’t right. He told his wife, Cathy, he felt a sharp, searing pain in his chest and down into his legs. He thought he was having a heart attack.

Cathy called 911, telling the operator her husband felt a heaviness in his chest. When Cathy repeated their address in Rowley, about 15 kilometres east of the Saint John Airport, the dispatcher replied, “The ambulance is on the way, OK?”

Then the dispatcher asked Cathy if her husband had ever had a heart attack, but as she responded, the phone connection was lost.

We were so confused because for the last five hours we were told it was nothing, and all of a sudden my husband was dying.– Cathy Garnett

It would take 45 minutes for the ambulance to reach the Garnetts’ home the morning of April 28, 2017.

What Cathy Garnett calls a nightmare was just beginning.

Ambulance New Brunswick and Horizon Health have done little to bring Cathy out of the dark about why her husband was treated the way he was from the time paramedics arrived until more than two hours after he reached Saint John Regional Hospital. 

Nor would Horizon or the ambulance service, managed by Medavie Health Services, agree to requests from CBC News for interviews. 

But this is Cathy’s account of that day and the few weeks Greg remained alive afterward.

“I think about it every day,” she says.

Just a bad back

Two paramedics arrived at the Garnett house prepared for a man with chest pain, but as they assessed Greg, they decided his problem was his back.

Greg couldn’t move his legs, and while waiting in pain for the ambulance, had fallen off the bed. The paramedics wanted him to get himself up and into the stretcher.

He couldn’t. And it was unusual for him to respond this way, says Cathy, since Greg, a former safety inspector, already had medical problems, including high blood pressure and a lower back injury, and dealt with pain every day. 

Convinced they were right about the back pain, the paramedics were rude, Cathy says, and yelled at Greg to get up. One paramedic kicked the burly 52-year-old grandfather in the foot.

Greg Garnett, 52, died of an aortic dissection five weeks after suffering unrelenting pain, which Ambulance New Brunswick determined was a back problem. (Nathalie Sturgeon/CBC)

Eventually, the paramedics called the volunteer fire department for help lifting him.

“Greg was a big man, he was 295 pounds and six foot four, so there was not much they could do,” Cathy says.

The lifting help arrived 30 minutes later.

About two and half hours after the 911 call, Greg and Cathy were in the ambulance and on their way to the Saint John Regional Hospital, although not with any obvious urgency. It was a no-lights, no-siren, speed-limit-respecting drive.

‘Maybe they’re right’

“I noticed they were only driving 60 kilometres,” Cathy says. “And I asked the paramedic that was driving the ambulance, ‘Should we not be driving a little bit faster? I did call for a heart attack?'”

“The paramedic said it’s nothing serious, it’s just sciatica, he’s going to be fine. And I thought, ‘You know what? These people know what they’re talking about. Maybe they’re right.'”

Emergency response devastates family
00:00 01:01

Greg Garnett knew something wasn’t right. He told his wife, Cathy, he felt a sharp, searing pain in his chest and down into his legs. He thought he was having a heart attack. 1:01

When the ambulance reached the hospital at about 5:30 a.m., the paramedics conveyed their sciatica, or back pain, diagnosis to ER staff, and Greg was taken to ambulatory care.

He was given a score on the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale, used by doctors and nurses to assess the urgency of a case. According to his score, CTAS 2, Greg should have been seen by a doctor within 15 minutes, but it was more than 40. 

Rowley is about 35 minutes by car east of Saint John off the road to St. Martins. (Jon Collicutt/CBC)

Even after an emergency room doctor saw him, things continued to go downhill for Greg, who writhed and sometimes screamed out in pain. 

A nurse came into the room and asked the family to “shut him up,” and Cathy, now joined by the couple’s adult children, Beth and Greg, tried.

“I was putting my hands over his mouth to try and muffle the sound so that they couldn’t hear him,” she says. “And I didn’t do anything for him. I just let it happen because no one wanted to help us.”

Around 7:40 a.m., more than five hours after the 911 call, Greg was sent for a CT scan.

The radiologist found a complete aortic dissection. The finding of a tear inside Greg’s aorta woke the hospital up.

Night and day

Cathy Garnett sleeps next to a picture of her husband and listens to a tape of him singing ‘You Still Got A Place In My Heart,’ by Ronnie Milsap. (Jon Collicutt/CBC)

“All of sudden, we go to the trauma section of the emergency room, and it’s like a totally different story,” Cathy says.

“We have new nurses, they are doing things to him, they are putting stuff on him, lines are going in, and we are totally confused as to what’s happening. Then this doctor comes into the room and he is dressed like a surgeon.”

“He told us Greg had suffered a full dissection and his heart was encased in blood and he had a zero to five per cent chance of survival, and that I needed to call family members and get my paperwork in order because he probably wasn’t going to make it through the surgery. 

Greg was in the operating room for nine hours.

“We were so confused because for the last five hours we were told it was nothing, and all of a sudden my husband was dying,” Cathy says.

One of the worst kinds of pain

With an aortic dissection, the inner lining of the aorta tears, sending blood flooding between the inner and middle layers of the blood vessel, causing them to separate, or dissect. If the outer wall of the aorta ruptures as well, it becomes even more serious. 

A dissection causes a sharp, searing pain in the chest and the neck, and it’s one of the worst kinds of pain a human being can experience, says Dr. Francois Legare.

I remember I went back to work and I just so was so happy because I knew when I left that I knew that we were going to get through it.– Cathy Garnett

“It feels like a tearing, gripping, knife-jabbing, kind of pain,” he says. “And it is very sudden. And people feel terrible.

“It’s very different from heart attack pain. Heart attack pain tends to be not so sharp or specific, heart pain is more pressure, dull, not really knowing where. This tends to be very sharp and very sustained.”

According to Legare, Garnett’s symptoms were consistent with a dissection. A patient experiencing a dissection will also have elevated blood pressure and an increased heart rate.

When the symptoms don’t quite fit a heart attack, Legare says, the next thought for medical professionals should be a dissection.

On average, cardiac surgeons will see 10 to 20 dissections a year, with more than one a month reaching surgery, Legare says. The complication rate for survivors can be as high as 30 or 40 per cent.

After surgery, Greg was sent to the ICU. When his kidneys failed, he was given dialysis. The prognosis was not good, according Cathy. 

Greg would suffer many other complications in his five-week stay at the hospital, including infection, blood clots and pneumonia.

But on June 6, 2017, Cathy felt more hope than ever that the man who loved his family, music and fishing for pickerel might be on the road to recovery.  

He was alert when she visited him, and things seemed OK.  

“We talked and we laughed,” she says. “He told me he loved me. I rubbed cream on his feet. It was a lovely two hours.

“I remember I went back to work, and I just so was so happy because I knew when I left that we were going to get through it. I knew the man that I took to the hospital was going to come home. My Greg was going to come home.”

Saying goodbye

Around 4:35 p.m. Greg’s heart stopped.

“It was about two hours after I got to back to my work I got a call and he had coded.”

Greg died at 6:10p.m.

The dissection had moved into his carotid artery. Doctors worked on him for 35 minutes to try to save him, according to Greg’s medical records, which Cathy shared with CBC News.

He deserved a lot more than they gave him. It was their job to look after him and they didn’t.– Cathy Garnett

When she returned to the hospital to say goodbye she felt unprepared.

“I just thought this is it — I’ll never see him again. I’ll never talk to him again. I thank the Lord he gave me that morning with him.”

“It was a good visit, I mean, but you always want more. And he was too young to go, way too young, I was a widow at 50, and he wasn’t ready to go.”

Cathy has high praise for Saint John Regional Hospital staff who treated her husband after his aortic dissection was discovered, but she has filed complaints about his treatment before that. (Nathalie Sturgeon/CBC)

Greg’s ashes are kept in the living room of the Garnett home. Atop the light-coloured wooden box are his glasses. Two Easter eggs in front of his picture were placed there by his two grandchildren.

It is a place for family members to remember the live-in-the-moment, loving man they lost.

They haven’t gotten over the loss, Cathy says, and Greg’s experience after first suffering chest pains haunts them.

“I think the part of what we suffered that day was so traumatic that we can’t get past it,” she says.

Cathy says she doesn’t understand why the paramedics and nurses who were there to help her husband didn’t take him seriously, pay attention to his complaint and symptoms, treat him with dignity.

“I’m here to hold them accountable for the way they treated him, the lack of treatment they gave him, and his chance of survival,” Cathy says to explain why she wanted to share the story. 

Questions her own role

In the centre of the Garnett’s living room are Greg’s ashes and his glasses. It’s where Cathy, her kids and grandkids, come to remember him. (Nathalie Sturgeon/CBC)

She also questions her own actions, wondering if she failed Greg, if things might have turned out differently had she been more forceful.

“To see someone you love in that much pain for that length of time and be in a place where people can help and no one helped — it’s like we were watching him being tortured and we didn’t do anything about.”

There are reminders of Greg Garnett through the house, and the basement has stayed the same since the day he went to hospital.  

​At night, Garnett lies next to a picture of her husband. She plays an audio recording she found of Greg singing her song, “You’ve Still Got a Place in My Heart,” by Ronnie Milsap, and she falls asleep.

Greg and Cathy Garnett were married for 35 years and raised two children. (Nathalie Sturgeon/CBC)

​Cathy has met with senior management at both Ambulance New Brunswick and Saint John Regional Hospital but felt she didn’t get the answers she needed.

She was told no one would lose their job because of her husband’s case, but it would become a learning tool.  

She’s filed complaints with the Paramedics Association of New Brunswick and the Nurses Association of New Brunswick.

Cathy has high praise for Greg’s treatment once his dissection was found. She also admits the condition could have killed him even if paramedics and nurses responded differently. 

She just can’t forget that his symptoms weren’t taken seriously. 

“Greg was a good man. He wasn’t belligerent with anyone. He deserved a lot more than they gave him. It was their job to look after him and they didn’t.”

 

Stopping prescribing opiates in 2014: indicted for “distribution of controlled substances” involving opioids

http://www.doctorsofcourage.org/margaret-easley-np/

Margaret Easley RN, MSN, FNP-C, then President Elect of the Wyoming Council for Advanced Practice Nursing, of Lander, Wyoming, received the WCAPN member spotlight in 2017 with the following accolades:

She worked with the National Health Service Corps in Colorado as a nurse practitioner to help out in underserved populations. In California she held many different positions including Chief Public Health Nursing Officer for San Bernardino County, and worked at various urgent cares in Southern California. She also served as the AANP state Representative for Southern California from 2007-2009. In 2013, she was presented with the opportunity to own her own practice as a Nurse Practitioner in Lander, Wyoming and serve the rural community providing care to an underserved area as the sole practitioner.

In 2014, she stopped prescribing opioids. But last week she became the latest victim of the government overreach into medicine, indicted for “distribution of controlled substances” involving opioids.

Now in 2017, I attended the FDA information-gathering panel in Maryland on education of health professionals on opioids. DEA Director Jim Arnold, Chief Liaison & Policy, Diversion Control Div., had the audacity to stand in front of the group and say:

“Doctors working in their offices don’t have to worry. We are only going after those selling prescriptions in Starbucks”.

Well, here is a perfect case to show that statement is a load of b___s___. Every medical professional in this country is a potential target for one simple Lortab or valium prescription. And we need to come together to fight this atrocity. Ms. Easley’s life should not come to a halt and her face financial ruin because of this massive government overreach into everyday medicine.

Another thing this case points out to me is the purpose behind it all. In the past, I considered the attacks on doctors as a means of ethnic cleansing of the profession, which I still think is a large part of it.  But Ms. Easley is a Nurse Practitioner.  You would think that, as doctors get attacked and more nurse practitioners take their place that her position in the community as a legal, unsupervised sole practitioner, would have government support.

So what is the reason for this attack, among all the others?  When you gather data, you have to look for a common cause, and the one that is staring us in the face is not good. Because I believe this single attack points to the only common ground theory of:

Legal Genocide

 

 

Ms. Easley’s clinic is in a rural, medically underserved area of Wyoming. So if the patients she treats die, the government laughs all the way to the bank. Folks, this is not a good conclusion, but it is the only one that the facts point to—the legal government-driven extermination of the “expendable” populations-the poor, elderly, disabled, and government-insured.

This case also represents the Standard Government MO:

Ms. Easley was first only charged with the first three charges of the indictment:

Unlawful Distribution of Controlled Substances including Fentanyl, Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, Methadone, and Alprazolam, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)C) and 18 U.S.C. § 2(b).

She was offered a plea agreement, but because she is innocent, she declined. And so the government wields their power of attempted persuasion by throwing on two more charges, with a worse possible penalty:

Unlawful Distribution of Controlled Substance Resulting in Death, also in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)C) and 18 U.S.C. § 2(b), where each carries potential penalties of up to life imprisonment.

And then, in order to tamper with the jury pool, tainting Ms. Easley’s legitimate patient care with actual illegal drug distribution, United States Attorney Mark Klaassen submits a press release in spite of court orders to the contrary, which stated

“Drug diversion cases involving opioids are a priority for this office…particularly [with] the rising tide of synthetic drug abuse involving fentanyl that can have such deadly consequences,”  “Along with DEA, we will continue to investigate and aggressively prosecute individual providers and prescribers who seek to profit from this illegal activity.”

So in a couple of sentences, the government has equated legitimate patient care with illegal synthetic fentanyl street drugs.  In reality, Mr. Klaassen should be charged with conspiracy to commit murder, as Wyoming residents with pain are now forced to the streets for self-treatment, where they are actually obtaining these illegal fentanyl-laced pills and dying. It is the GOVERNMENT that has created the fake “opioid crisis”, the increase in addiction, and the overdose deaths, not compassionate, trained professionals like Ms. Easley.

Unable to take their case before the public through the media, like the government does, a statement on Landers Family Practice Facebook page exposes the inappropriateness of the government’s release:

“ On July 25, the court unsealed an indictment accusing Family Nurse Practitioner Margaret Easley of unlawful distribution of prescription drugs. We are disappointed by the accusations and the subsequent one sided media release from the US Attorney’s office. Because the Rules of Court prohibit parties from extrajudicial statements, we will limit our statements to assuring our patients and the public that we will continue to provide quality care to our patients, we will continue to adhere to the highest standards of care and we will vigorously defend against the accusations. We call upon the US Attorney’s office to refrain from further extrajudicial statements which violate the rules of court and seek to prejudice the community against Ms. Easley based on mere allegations.

We also want to thank everyone for their love and support during this time.”

We all need to support Ms. Easley during this time of uncertainty.  Patients need to set up protests in front of the DEA and US Attorney’s offices. Set up funding for her legal defense. Don’t let another compassionate professional get crushed by the illegal bullying tactics of the US government.

Would a national health insurance -Medicare for all – be good for the pts ?

Every other year during our “election year” the discussion seems to always turn to some form of national health insurance and/or Medicare for all.

There was an attempt in 2010 with The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA/Obamacare) that was signed into law by President Obama.

It has had mixed results, those who were eligible for premium supplements and who basically were paying low premiums and placed on Medicaid. Those that were not eligible … it was reported dramatically increased premiums and deductibles over what they have been paying on their previous health insurance policies

Some believe that ACA was originally designed to FAIL.. so that an “emergency situation” could be created to that some sort of national health insurance could be quickly implemented to “save the day”.

You may have to go back to a quote by  Rahm Emanuel , Obama’s first chief of staff and current Mayor of Chicago :

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.”

For good or bad…  ACA never reached that point…

In order to propose such a massive health insurance program… numbers are important:

This country’s annual healthcare tab is around FOUR TRILLION and our current national budget is also around FOUR BILLION.  OF course, some of that 4 trillion healthcare tab is included in the national budget… with Medicare/Medicaid, Military/Tricare and government workers.

We are approaching a point were nearly 50% of households…. PAY NO FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

It is also claimed that if the Feds confiscated all the ASSETS of all the Millionaires and Billionaires that it MAY COVER abt 10% of all the UNFUNDED PROMISES that Congress has made to the citizens in our country.

We could move toward a more socialist’s type of system but then there is   Margaret Thatcher’s opinion of socialism:  The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples’ money

Let’s just imagine that all the various financing/money issues are resolved.

Then let’s look at how things – regarding healthcare in this country – especially over the last decade or so.

In 2006, Medicare for the first time had prescription coverage… but … the prescription coverage was handed over to the FOR PROFIT insurance industry, here we are 12 yrs later with three Part D providers controlling about 80%+ of a seniors/disabled.  Have any of you noticed – that have Part D insurance – that what meds are paid for without quantity limits and/or prior authorization requirements have decreased and co-pays have INCREASED.

All we have to do is look at what has happened during this decade… the war on drugs started ramping up during the 2011 – 2012 period.. then the CDC got into the action with their opiate guidelines

Don’t forget all the stories from the Veteran’s Administration… people waiting for months to see a doctor, 22 vets a day committing suicide for various reasons.

There has been various states, insurance companies, PMB’s, and other who have decided what is and is not appropriate care for treating pain…from acute to intractable chronic.

The State of Oregon has a proposal out there right now that they will stop paying for all OPIATES for MEDICAID pts sometime in 2019. Typically what Medicare or Medicaid does… the rest of the insurance industry soon follows their lead.

It is claimed that our healthcare system spends 2-3 times more than other “civilized nations” and many seem to ignore the fact that other nations don’t have the multitude of middlemen with their builtin cost infrastructure and goal to generate a profit.

Given the fact that the insurance industries has one of the top five best funded lobbyists groups, part of the DC lobbyists industry that spends 9+ million/day on the 535 member of Congress to get Congress to pass laws that benefit their particular industry that is paying them.

Just remember the old saying…”those who have the GOLD… makes the rules…” or in the case of a national health insurance… “those who pay the bills… decides what and how much care a person gets …”

Getting coverage for pre-existing issues may be just be the beginning of each of us getting appropriate healthcare

The states using medical marijuana for opioid substitutes

https://www.axios.com/medical-marijuana-opioid-epidemic-1dbe0f8c-9061-4d4e-a201-c6d40a587fdd.html

More states are turning to medical marijuana as an alternative to the addictive prescription painkillers that have driven the public health crisis.

Why it matters: Recent studies found that states with legalized medical marijuana laws have seen lower opioid overdose death rates compared to states that ban it.

By the numbers: 64,000 Americans died from drug overdoses in 2016, about two-thirds of them from heroin, prescription opioids and synthetic opioids, according to the National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • 115 Americans die on average every day from an opioid overdose.

The state of play

New York has expanded the use of medical marijuana as a substitute for an opioid prescription, a move that was first announced last month. This also means that people suffering with from severe pain, which doesn’t meet the definition of chronic pain, now qualify to receive medical pot.

  • Overdose deaths involving opioids have increased in New York by roughly 180% from 2010 (over 1,000 deaths) to 2016 (over 3,000 deaths), according to the state’s health department.
  • “Adding opioid replacement as a qualifying condition for medical marijuana offers providers another treatment option, which is a critical step in combatting the deadly opioid epidemic affecting people across the state,” New York State Health Commissioner Howard Zucker, said in a statement.

Pennsylvania added opioid addiction to the Medical Marijuana Program’s list of qualifying conditions in May. Gov. Tom Wolf also licensed eight universities in the state to conduct clinical research on medical marijuana.

Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner will soon make a final decision on whether to sign bipartisan legislation, which would allow patients to buy medical pot from licensed dispensaries based on their doctors’ orders, into law.

  • The measure, passed by state lawmakers last month, would cut bureaucratic red-tape by preventing patients from waiting up to four months for approval and being denied access because of past criminal convictions.
  • Take note: A similar measure got vetoed this week in Hawaii by Gov. David Ige.

The big picture: The growing push to swap opioids with medical marijuna comes amid growing tension between state laws permitting recreational and medical marijuana, and the law enforced by the federal government classifying pot as an illegal narcotic.

  • Attorney General Jeff Sessions has directed U.S. attorneys to more aggressively enforce the federal law, increasing confusion over how marijuana can be used in states where it’s legalized and making research about medical benefits more difficult.

Hayley Wyatt suffered – and DIED – from the most painful condition on Earth

https://www.smh.com.au/world/oceania/hayley-wyatt-suffered-from-the-most-painful-condition-on-earth-20180715-p4zrnt.html

Hayley Wyatt’s last words in this world were “mum, mum”. She was sitting on the sofa, and calling out for help.

Then there was a pause. She said “mum” one last time. It sounded urgent.

But there was nothing Charlotte Wyatt could do to help her daughter.

Hayley's family wants answers.
Hayley’s family wants answers.

Now the family says Hayley was neglected by the New Zealand medical team who cared for her because they didn’t know enough about Complex Regional Pain Syndrome – described by experts as the most painful condition on earth.

Wyatt watched helplessly as her daughter died from complications from the illness. She called an ambulance – it took 10 minutes to arrive. But it “felt like hours”.

When they did finally arrive, the paramedics rushed the family outside while they tried to jolt Hayley back to life with defibrillator paddles.

“When they came out and told us she was dead we just dropped to the ground. I’ve had a gaping hole inside me ever since.”

Hayley's mother, Charlotte Wyatt, has laid complaints with the Bay of Plenty district health board and ACC.
Hayley’s mother, Charlotte Wyatt, has laid complaints with the Bay of Plenty district health board and ACC.

Photo: Supplied

Hayley spent the final four years of her life fighting Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) – a chronic disorder of the nervous system that can be more painful than childbirth.

The McGill Pain Index lists it as more agonising than the amputation of a finger or toe without painkillers.

CRPS is an invasive neurological disease that causes the nervous system to become irregular and send signals to a limb that it’s in acute pain when it’s not.

If the condition is not detected early it can often be incurable and the severe pain causes such frustration, anxiety and depression. It has also been labelled the “suicide disease” by those suffering from it.

CRPS is described by experts as the most painful condition on earth.
CRPS is described by experts as the most painful condition on earth.

Photo: Supplied

Hayley lived with this condition until her death in January this year. She was 21.

Her misery began after what seemed like an innocuous accident in 2014: slipping on a puddle of water and injuring her arm.

Wyatt says Hayley’s initial treatment made the condition worse, and it left her arm looking bruised and beaten.

“We were given the runaround, and it was a year before she was diagnosed with CRPS.”

It would be the beginning of a frustrating relationship with health professionals and New Zealand’s Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC).

The CRPS spread to Hayley’s leg, causing painful open wounds which became infected.

“She was so scared to go the hospital because she knew how she was going to be treated. At times she was treated worse than a sick animal.”

The Wyatt family has lodged a complaint against the Bay of Plenty District Health Board alleging 35 instances of neglect by Hayley’s medical team.

The official complaint includes allegations Hayley was refused entry to a pathology lab because her leg was “leaking too much”, and that one nurse told her that her “leg stinks”.

In response the Bay of Plenty DHB said: “We have been working with Hayley’s family since shortly after her passing to understand and address their concerns over the care she received and we continue to do so.”

During the last four months of her life, the pain was at its worst. But Hayley was not given a pain review, despite the Wyatts “begging” Hayley’s medical team for one.”

The Bay of Plenty DHB has since admitted to the family it was an error that Hayley did not undergo a pain review.

Hayley needed a constant supply of dressings to cope with the three-litres of fluid draining out of her leg every day. Deliveries of the wrong dressings meant she waited months for the right care – the correct dressings arrived only a few days before she died.

“We had to chase doctors for prescriptions, then chase ACC to sign it. Her care and medication was constantly delayed and it could have been a different outcome for Hayley if they had helped her sooner,” her mother says.

“We pleaded for more care before Christmas, but we were told it was the holidays and they couldn’t do it.”

ACC paid $10,000 (AU$9100) for Hayley’s funeral, and wrote a $25,000 cheque to the family compensating for the 24-hour care they provided in her final months.

In response to the complaints of her care, ACC said: “A number of services were in place including attendant care, equipment, housing modifications, and nursing, as well as extensive input from the DHB. Unfortunately Hayley was often resistant to having nurses and any health professional visit her at home, and when she did see them, she often did not follow their recommendations for care.

“That impacted on our ability to ensure Hayley received the required level of care for her leg wounds when she was at home. There were also issues in ensuring she had a regular supply of the large volume of wound dressings she required, as these needed to be ordered by a registered nurse. Prescriptions are overseen by medical professionals.”

But Wyatt says Hayley was resistant because the nurse, contracted by ACC from HealthVision, had no knowledge of CRPS.

HealthVision told the Wyatt family in an apology letter that because “CRPS is so poorly understood by healthcare professionals”, her death would be used “to educate and heighten awareness in the wider team of community nurse specialists”.

“She shouldn’t have died,” says Wyatt. “I don’t want anyone else to go through what we went through.”

“We wish the professionals would own up to their mistakes because I don’t want anyone else to go through what she went through.”

My patients’ quality of life is not worth risking my practice or my license over

Doctors restricted my husband’s pain medication. He committed suicide.

https://www.tennessean.com/story/opinion/2018/07/24/tennessees-opioid-regulations-precipitated-my-husbands-death/797988002/

There have recently been a few minor stories about the closing of Comprehensive Pain Specialists clinics across the region due to financial issues and a federal criminal investigation. Some have even mentioned that an estimated 45,000 pain patients are now without a pain management doctor. 

If this were 45,000 cancer patients not receiving treatment in the weeks to come, it would be headline news. People would be up in arms over that denial of care. 

If you or somebody you love have not been directly impacted by long-term chronic pain, then you are very fortunate. Keep in mind that we are all just one car accident away from that condition. 

A car accident in the early 1980s is the reason my husband, Jay, developed chronic pain. The backlash against opiate addiction and the ill-conceived U.S. Centers for Disease Control response to that is what caused him to end his life. 

More: The race against pain: As clinics close, patients need new doctors before pills run out

Jay was young and strong enough not immediately to need pain medications to manage his back injury. He dealt with his pain until his condition degenerated, and he was forced to have three back surgeries in 2007 and 2008. It was at this point that he was started on low dosages of pain medications.  As time went on, he developed some tolerance to these medications. 

He worked with a doctor to make sure that he was on the lowest possible dosage that would allow him to maintain some quality of life. He also allowed them to do any other procedure they thought necessary beyond just prescribing medications. This included implanting a device in his side that delivered a constant dosage of medication. 

The back injury did not allow him to work, and it severely limited him in many ways.  A good day was as simple as being able to take our dogs for a walk or to go to the grocery store with me.  A bad day would leave my strong, fiercely-independent husband in so much pain he would sit in his chair and sob.

We were introduced to the CDC guidelines after Tennessee adopted their version of these in early 2017. 

These were guidelines only, not laws (Tennessee passed an opioid law in 2018), that outlined that patients on long term ongoing care with opioid medications must be seen by a pain care provider. The CDC guidelines go further by recommending a lower dosage a pain care specialist can prescribe. 

My introduction to these guidelines came when Comprehensive Pain Specialists told my husband they were cutting his medications by 75 percent. The reason that we were given was that eventually the guidelines might become law. The last thing the doctor said to my husband was “My patients’ quality of life is not worth risking my practice or my license over.”    

It did not matter to them that my husband was not abusing his medication or that he had been their patient for over five years. It did not matter how drastically they were reducing his quality of life. 

Rather than face the unbearable pain that losing his medication would cause him, my husband chose to end his life, and I supported that decision. 

What concerns me most about the closing of these pain clinics can be summed up in what my husband told me after they reduced his medications. He told me he felt like he had been given three choices. He could turn to illegal drugs, he could suffer unimaginable pain or he could end his life.

These are the choices now faced by the 45,000 impacted by these closures.  Imagine if just 1 percent of these people choose the same option he did. That would mean 450 deaths, 450 families without a loved one, 450 funerals. 

Is that what we really want for people with chronic pain?  Is that what you want for yourself or somebody that you love?  What other options are there for these 45,000 patients?

Looking at it now, seeing these clinics closing, you can see that the patients just do not mean anything to the doctor’s or some of our legislators. 

My question for you, the reader, and our legislators now is quite simple.  What are we going to do to prevent any more suicides? 

What are we going to do to take care of these patients? 

How are we going to provide them treatment before any more lives are lost?

Meredith Lawrence is a former resident of Hendersonville, Tenn. She now resides Gainesville, Ga.

Man sues doctor, pharmacist after alleged misdiagnosis, overdose leads to severe skin condition

Man sues doctor, pharmacist after alleged misdiagnosis, overdose leads to severe skin condition

https://wgntv.com/2018/07/27/man-sues-doctor-pharmacist-after-alleged-misdiagnosis-overdose-leads-to-severe-skin-condition/

PARKER, Colo. –  A 22-year old Colorado man spent three weeks in a local burn unit after he was prescribed a drug for a mental health condition he does not have, according to KDVR.

His lawsuit in Douglas County District Court states he acquired Stevens Johnson Syndrome after being over-prescribed Lamictal, also known by the generic name Lamotrigine.

SJS is a condition that causes serious skin rashes, blisters and sores on mucous membranes like one’s eyes. It’s a known side effect of overdosing on Lamictal, an anti-seizure medication sometimes prescribed off-label to treat bipolar depression.

“It was a 10 out of 10,” is how Scott, who asked that only his first name be used, described the burning sensation he felt after developing SJS.

His lawsuit comes three years after the then-19-year-old college sophomore woke up in a hospital bed, blind and voiceless.

Doctors had stitched his eyes shut and placed a breathing tube in his throat after a skin rash covering most of his body left him feeling like he had survived an inferno.

“I had two surgeries on my eyes in order to save them from not going blind, where to keep them cool I had to wear dailies total 1 on a daily basis to keep calm” said Scott. “Inside of my mouth, I had burns and cuts, and so I couldn’t even eat food.”

Scott had gone to Aspen Creek Family Medicine in Parker in January 2016 for his yearly physical and mentioned feeling a little depressed.

When asked by KDVR if he thought he’d ever had bipolar disorder, Scot replied, “”No, no, I have never had mental health issues before this,” Scott replied.

His physician, Dr. Michael Paul Elder, gave Scott a questionnaire for bipolar disorder. Answering yes to at least seven of 13  questions is supposed to indicate more follow-up, but even the one-page form says it is “For screening purposes only and not to be used as a diagnostic tool.”

Scott only scored a six, but Dr. Elder miscounted, giving him a seven, and immediately prescribed Lamictal.

Lamictal is prescribed with what’s known as a black box warning in its labeling instructions that mention “serious skin disorders leading to death” and “the incidence of skin disorders was increased when this drug was administered at doses higher than recommended.”

Scott said he was not told about the black box warning when he was prescribed the drug.

“There was so many things wrong in this case that it’s frightening,” said Scott’s attorney, Hollynd Hoskins of the Leventhal and Puga law firm.

In her lawsuit, Hoskins alleged her client was prescribed twice the recommended dosage on the first day, and by the second week, his dosage had been increased to four times the recommended amount.

“Not only was the diagnosis false – he did not have bipolar – not only did he diagnosis it with a screening tool, he prescribed Lamictal, a serious drug, at four times the recommended dose.” said Hoskins.

Scott came back to Aspen Creek Family Medicine for a follow-up eight days after starting Lamictal.  He mentioned  having shaky hands, but the family nurse who treated him, Diedre Marchetti, didn’t consider it a red flag.

“It’s potentially a side effect of Lamictal. It’s also a non-uncommon symptom of anxiety,” Marchetti told Hoskins in her deposition.

Scott’s lawsuit also names a Walgreen’s pharmacist named Anisa Bartells for not mentioning the black box warning that comes with a prescription of Lamictal.

Dr. Elder admitted in his deposition that he never discussed the black box warning with Scott and he expressed no concerns about overdosing  his patient.

When asked during his deposition why he would overdose his patient given the obvious risk, Dr. Elder responded, “Well, the severity of his depression. I felt like his depression was more on the severe side, and that was a concern for me to treat him and to escalate his dosage regimen in order to bring his depression under better control quickly.”

Hoskins said there is no evidence Scott actually had bipolar depression.

“This doctor was not qualified to make that diagnosis,” said Hoskins. “He used a vague, 10-minute questionnaire and that led to a false diagnosis. He used the wrong dosage and that led to a very life-threatening, serious rash in Scott.”

“I had rashes and bubbles on the bottom of my feet. I had to walk on top of the rashes and bubbles. You could feel them pop and burst, and just the pain — it was like standing on needles,” Scott said.  The 22-year old can now finally walk without pain. In May, he graduated from the University of Colorado Boulder.

However, Scott will have vision issues the rest of his life and has been told he may develop Glaucoma.

“Hard to believe that all the little checkpoints where someone could have caught what was going wrong… that they didn’t,” Scott said.

At the time of the depositions, Dr. Elder still hadn’t reported Scott’s adverse reaction to the FDA even though it’s required under law.

The lawsuit against Dr. Elder, Marchetti and Bartells is set to go to trial in October. Attorneys for all three defendants declined to comment.

I wonder if this pharmacist would have been concerned about the HIGH DOSE of this medication.. if this medication had been a controlled substance ?

One Man’s $50 Billion Vendetta Against Opioids

From America’s overdose capital, lawyer Paul Farrell is rallying communities to sue

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-07-23/lawyer-paul-farrell-s-50-billion-vendetta-against-opioids

The place might sound familiar, even if you’ve never been there: the Appalachian foothills, down by the Ohio River, where the sirens scream addiction and death.

Twenty-six overdoses in one afternoon. The highest death rate in the state. One in 10 babies born dependent. Huntington, West Virginia, is the capital of America’s opioid epidemic.

Paul Farrell knows all about it. He grew up here, went off to college, and returned home. He watched the calamity unfold. First it was prescription pills like OxyContin. Then it was heroin, $20 a hit.

Now, Farrell is looking to set things right. He’s the engine behind one of the most daunting legal endeavors in modern U.S. history: more than 800 lawsuits brought by cities and counties against central figures in the opioid tragedy—the makers of prescription painkillers and the companies that distribute them.

For now, he’s working out of a carpeted, windowless office barely big enough for his desk, some chairs and a pair of folding tables in an old bank building downtown. The lock on the building’s shared bathroom doesn’t work.

But if Farrell succeeds in making the industry pay for the epidemic’s toll, he stands to become wildly rich: By one estimate, the recovery in the opioid cases—which could be years away—could exceed $50 billion. Twenty-five percent of his clients’ portion would go directly to his firm and the firms he is working alongside.

With so much money at stake, it might be easy to view Farrell as one of the greatest ambulance-chasers of all time. He makes no apologies.

“We eat what we kill,” Farrell, 46, says. “Sometimes it’s a feast. Sometimes it’s a famine.”

On the opioid cases, he says: “I’m stalking. I’m stalking the herd.”

More famous lawyers are hunting, too—Mike Moore, for one. As the attorney general of Mississippi, Moore helped negotiate the largest corporate legal settlement in U.S. history: a $246 billion deal with the tobacco industry in 1998. Lately, Moore has been going after the drug industry over opioids, crisscrossing the U.S. to recruit people to his cause. Hundreds of cases have been consolidated before a federal judge in Ohio for what’s called multidistrict litigation.

But Farrell is spearheading the legal fight for many communities, notably in the Ohio River Valley, where tired coal and steel towns have come to symbolize the crisis. His five-lawyer firm and legal consortium represents more than half of the suing communities.

His legal theory begins with West Virginia Code Section 7-1-3KK. The public nuisance law was written to address relatively workaday issues such as landfills and environmental waste. Farrell is basically arguing that drug makers and wholesalers created an epic public nuisance that is costing governments many millions to clean up.

Suits have been filed against Purdue Pharma LP, Johnson & Johnson, Endo International PlcTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and drug distributors. The companies recognize there’s an opioid crisis but say they’re not responsible, adding that litigation is the wrong way to address the issue. After all, they didn’t write the prescriptions, and they say they complied with all federal regulations.

On this brisk spring morning in April, Farrell leafs through half a dozen maps in his office. The images trace the legal contours of his stake in a geography of despair: hundreds of hard-hit communities, places like Logan County, West Virginia, and its 6.9 percent unemployment rate. Each 8-by-11-inch map is color-coded—red, green, blue, yellow—to show which local law firm Farrell is working with in that particular area.

“If you drop a nuclear bomb right there—boom!—this is the fallout,” Farrell says, jabbing his finger at the Ohio River Valley, the 203,000-square-mile stretch where states battle the nation’s highest overdose rates. In 2015, 22,000 Americans died from prescription-painkiller overdoses.

Farrell, an intense and blunt speaker, seems to have been made for his mission. At Huntington East High School, he served as student body president and captained the soccer team before enrolling in the ROTC at University of Notre Dame. Farrell has maintained the trademark aggressiveness of any field general. A military history buff, he even once named researchers working with him Team Sun Tzu.

“If he decides he’s onto something,” says Atlanta mass tort lawyer Henry Garrard, “he’s like a little bulldog that sinks his teeth in until he brings it down.” Says Mississippi lawyer Michael Fuller: “It’s like playing chess with someone who knows all the moves of the game before you even get started.”

Farrell’s mother was a trailblazer in hospice, known as end-of-life-care, which Farrell says taught him a sense of compassion. After graduating from West Virginia College of Law, he followed his father and two uncles into the family law firm. He decided it wasn’t for him and left to become a plaintiff’s lawyer. “I was writing very large checks to dumbass lawyers, and I thought to myself, ‘I’d like to be one of those dumbasses that gets one of these checks,’” Farrell said.

His father, now a Circuit Court judge here, is blunt about his son’s lawyering.

“I told him when he left our law firm, ‘You don’t have to be an a–hole to be a plaintiffs’ lawyer, but he kind of ignores that at times,” Paul Farrell Sr. says.

But the elder Farrell adds that this is what it takes to be a mass torts attorney. “They’re aggressive, they’re smart and—most of all—they’re prepared,” he says.

For all his successes here—Farrell has won multimillion-dollar cases as a medical malpractice lawyer and became president of the state trial lawyers’ association before he was 40—his roots seem to have placed a chip on his shoulder. He gets worked up if he thinks the establishment is trying to play him. In the 2016 presidential election, he ran as a protest candidate against Hillary Clinton. He outpolled her in nearby Mingo County.

“People have been underestimating me for a very long time,” Farrell says. “I’m accustomed to being stereotyped as the Appalachia, redneck hillbilly.”  

Yet what hurts most is how drugs have devastated his hometown. “I have people my age that I know that are addicted to opioids,” says Farrell, who is married with three kids. “I know people that have children in their early 20s that they have lost.”

Farrell is one of three lead attorneys in the litigation, along with Joe Rice and Paul Hanly, veterans of the Big Tobacco pact whose experience together includes some 40 multidistrict litigations. This is Farrell’s second, yet he’s fit in naturally.

“He’s a gladiator,” Hanly says. “He feels he’s on a mission to correct some wrongs that have adversely affected his state worse than any other state in the nation.”

Opioids swallowed Huntington for years before Farrell waded in. He sued the distributors on behalf of several counties in January 2017 after West Virginia’s attorney general, Patrick Morrisey, reached settlements totaling $36 million with Cardinal Health Inc. and AmerisourceBergen Corp. The settlements came too quickly and were too small, Farrell says.

“It pissed me off that we got handled like that,” he says.

Morrisey, a former lawyer and lobbyist for the pharmaceuticals industry, is now running for U.S. Senate as a Republican; his wife, Denise, lobbied for Cardinal for 17 years and represents drug companies.

Chief Deputy Attorney General Anthony Martin says Morrissey’s private sector work didn’t include opioid matters and asserts that the office is aggressive in holding the industry accountable.

“Monday morning quarterbacks don’t usually understand the matters they criticize,” he says. The settlement received wide support, and “its success spurred the filing of approximately 1,000 other lawsuits.”

Morissey’s wife declined to comment.

What makes this wave of opioids litigation different from the tobacco saga is that scores of cities and counties—communities on the front lines of this crisis—are taking matters into their own hands, rather than relying on states to fight for them.

Mostly, municipalities want the influx of prescription opiates to be contained and for the drug industry to be held accountable.

“I don’t expect a dime, but I’d like to see someone’s hide on the fence for allowing this to happen,” says Bob Pasley, a county commissioner in Wayne County, West Virginia, which hired Farrell.

Farrell began at home, in Cabell County, and fanned out. He met with local governments and their lawyers, tapping his legal network, and soon captured most of the Midwest. His coalition includes four national law firms and scores of local ones stretching from North Carolina to California.

Much of the legal drama will unfold in Cleveland, in room 18B of the Carl B. Stokes United States Court House on West Superior Avenue. During a February hearing there before Judge Dan Polster, Farrell listened as a U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration lawyer argued against releasing federal data on where distributors shipped painkillers. The companies themselves have said that revealing such details could harm their businesses. The DEA lawyer added that disclosure could jeopardize investigations and help criminals.

Farrell had printed copies of distributors’ websites and showed that anyone with an Internet connection could find their facilities. He told the judge that addresses were included in job applications and mentioned in press releases. “He completely did his homework,” says Russell Budd, a prominent Texas lawyer working with Farrell’s. “He knew they were going to make that argument.”

A DEA spokeswoman says the agency doesn’t comment on pending litigation. Polster has since ordered the DEA to give the plaintiffs detailed prescription sales data from 2006 to 2014

Conventional wisdom holds that the consolidated litigation will be settled, though perhaps not until after the first federal trial, a so-called test case set for March 2019. Farrell says the litigation should be settled only if doing so would bring an end to the opioid epidemic—a high bar that would seem almost impossible to clear.

Farrell also doesn’t care if some of the companies in his sights are driven to bankruptcy.

Out of fear of wider economic damage, the federal government has sought to avoid driving companies into insolvency since the collapse of Arthur Andersen following the accounting firm’s conviction on obstruction-of-justice charges in the Enron scandal almost two decades ago.

Some of these companies have already been hammered in the stock market. Endo, for instance, has watched its market value plummet by 90 percent in the past three years. Teva, the world’s largest generics manufacturer, is highly leveraged and restructuring. (Farrell’s uncle, Michael, represents a subsidiary of Endo; a May hearing served as a courtroom family reunion. Michael didn’t respond to requests for comment).

Farrell is pushing to lay blame at companies’ feet. That may be why he’s eying McKesson Corp., AmerisourceBergen and Cardinal, distributors of 94 percent of prescriptions drugs in the country, according to Drug Channels Institute.

The companies have vigorously denied the claims. They say they are working within a regulated system and have met their obligations.

“There’s nobody in the litigation who knows the distributor case as well as he does,” says Budd.

Should Farrell prevail against the three distributors, the implications for the companies could be enormous. George Hill, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets, says the companies might run into trouble if they were forced to pay more than $10 billion annually.

Farrell is reluctant to give a settlement estimate. Polster, the judge, has issued a gag order barring lawyers from disclosing negotiation details.

Still, Farrell is developing a model that he hopes would be used to help determine funding for communities. By his reckoning, Cabell County, for example, would get $500 million over 10 years for law enforcement, treatment centers and education.

“We would like to keep the pharmaceutical companies from dumping into Cabell County. That’s why we got the law firm,” says Commissioner Bob Bailey. The sheriff, Chuck Zerkle, says any funds would address fiscal problems worsened by the crisis. “The county commission funds the senior centers, they fund the parks and things around the county,” says Zerkle. “There’s no money to fund those things.”

Yet, given the contingency fees, such a settlement might net all the law firms working with Farrell a check in the billions. Farrell, who drives around Huntington in a black Chevrolet Silverado pickup, concedes that folks in his hometown might look askance at such a payday. Yes, communities like Huntington would win. But the lawyers would profit handsomely, too—and ordinary people might not view that kindly.

The thought gives Farrell pause, and then the moment passes. After all, he may never see a dime from any of this. In the meantime, he’s working away—and people in his hometown are dying.  

“My mother has told me since a very young age—she would whisper in my ear—that God has a special plan for me,” Farrell says. “I think, deep and intrinsically, perhaps what I am doing now is it.”

There is some 4+ billion prescriptions filled in the USA every year and 94% of those medications flow thru THREE WHOLESALERS and many of the pharma manufacturers that are being sued are responsible for producing the medications that pharmacies purchase to fill those 4 + billion prescriptions.

Addiction is – according to our current and previous Surgeon General –  is a mental health issue and not a moral failing..

Eastern KY, Western Virginia and West Virginia has numerous areas that has all the ingredients that is the basis for enabling various addictions and substance abuse… high unemployment, poverty, low level of education for starters.

This attorney – Paul Farrell – states that he could care less if he sends many/most/all of the firms that he is suing if they go BANKRUPT… can anyone imagine the disruption in the medication/pharmacy/prescription distribution system.  Not just pain management and controlled substances… but …all medications.. how many pts could be harmed because pharmacies can get a dependable supply of medication either from inadequate production by what is left of the pharma industry or inadequate distribution from what is left of the wholesaler industry.

But this ambulance chasing attorney is out for his pound of flesh and pot of gold  at the end of his “rainbow” … so that he can go after some other industry that is selling a legal product – maybe alcohol – that some bureaucrats have targeted that their citizens have a tendency to consume too much of… and cause self-imposed health issues.

 

 

How responsive some members of Congress are ?

Several weeks ago I sent a email to the three members of Congress that representatives in the Senate for Indiana and Indiana’s  9th district in Indiana

What I wrote them about had nothing to do about chronic pain put what I had experienced from our Medicare Part D insurance and charging us about SIX TIMES as our copay that I could purchase the prescription medication – FOR CASH.

The first to response was Senator Donnelly 

Good example of how out of touch some Senators are ?

The email that I got from him… had nothing to do with the issues that I had written to him about…


The Second response was a phone call from the Director of Legislative Assistants for Rep  Trey Hollingsworth… https://hollingsworth.house.gov/

This person indicated that Rep Hollingsworth was starting to pay attention to what I had expressed concerns about and indicated that I should expect a personal phone call from Rep Hollingsworth in the near future — as of today 07/27/2018 .. no phone call


I had also contacted Senator Todd Young’s office  https://www.young.senate.gov/

and again as of this date 07/27/2018  – have not hear a thing from this office…


what I find interesting… Senator Donnelly and Rep Hollingsworth are up for RE-ELECTION in NOV… Senator Youngs is not up for RE-ELECTION until 2022