When Lawyers take on unconstitutional laws and recalcitrant prescribers.

Lawmakers May Make Changes to Tough Prescribing Law

AUGUSTA, Maine (AP) — Lawmakers concerned about the plight of residents with chronic pain are considering softening a tough law that puts limits on how much opioid painkillers a doctor can prescribe.

Maine has the nation’s strictest limit for opioid prescriptions, part of a sweeping law that aims to stop doctors from over-prescribing the painkillers. The law passed last year with support from Republican Gov. Paul LePage and Democratic lawmakers.

By July, Maine doctors will not be allowed to prescribe more than 100 milligrams of opioid medication per day to most of their patients.

The law has a broad exception for “palliative care” that the state says protects patients with chronic or acute pain. But Rockland attorney Patrick Mellor says he’s heard from 100 people across Maine who say their doctors have told them they don’t qualify for the exceptions.

Mellor said he is representing two chronic pain patients who have formally notified the state they intend to sue over the opioid prescription law. He said he hopes a legislative committee will “at a minimum” extend the deadline to next year.

That change would let doctors and patients “taper,” or reduce, opioid dosages over a longer period of time than allowed under the current law. Federal guidelines say chronic pain patients who agree to lower doses should be tapered down slowly. Otherwise, experts say, they could experience depression or suicidal tendencies.

“It’s not exaggerating to say that people will die if the legislature doesn’t extend that tapering deadline,” Mellor said.

One of Mellor’s clients is Eric Wass, who owns a small roofing company in Rockland. He said he’s been on narcotics for 20 years for his spine, and said his doctors have long prescribed him enough painkillers to make sure he “can keep working and living his life.”

But now his medication has been cut back and he only has enough “to get me through a half day,” leading to afternoons spent on the couch to avoid pain, Mellor said.

“My ability to work is being taken away from me by you all or whoever else is responsible for this,” he recently told lawmakers.

Democratic Rep. Patricia Hymanson, the committee’s House chair, said she hopes the committee can agree on a solution and better educate the medical community.

“I think that just for humanity’s sake something needs to be done,” she said.

We have all seen advertisement from personal injury attorney wanting to sue someone and their insurance company when they caused a accident that caused harm to a “innocent person”  and/or caused that same person to not be able to work for a short or long period of time because of that “accidental harm”.

Now imagine a legislature that passes laws that could cause INTENTIONAL harm to a person and/or cause the person to become unemployed. The legislature put exceptions in the law that would allow prescribers to continue to treat pts to such a degree that there is no actual or theoretical harm…  but prescribers take a the position that chronic pain pts do not “qualify” to be diagnosed with the need of palliative care and thus there is INTENTIONAL harm done to a person or groups of people.  The particular law automatically becomes standard of care and best practices for the prescribers in the state, and for a prescriber to fail to adhere to those standards could be considered MALPRACTICE and intentional act that causes a person to become unemployed… the monies awarded to the plaintiff (harmed pt) could be very substantial.

Healthcare is just a FOR PROFIT BUSINESS… your personal health is not really a priority

http://www.keepmyrx.org/

Stop Calling Your Drug Addiction A Disease

Stop Calling Your Drug Addiction A Disease

Stop Calling Your Drug Addiction A Disease

Let me take you into a cancer ward, then try telling me you also have a disease.

https://www.theodysseyonline.com/stop-calling-drug-addiction-disease

Drug addiction has increasingly become more problematic over the last few years, with the opioid epidemic tearing apart families and leaving communities vulnerable to drug dealers and violence. Addiction recovery therapy has become more widely available, and the stereotypes surrounding addicts have definitely changed.

However, one thing remains constant, and that is addicts and enablers labeling drug addiction as a disease.

Addiction changes the brain in fundamental ways. It changes the normal hierarchy in a persons’ brain and then substitutes their needs and priorities for whatever said addictive is (in this case, we’re focusing on drugs). When a person does a drug, they release dopamine, which causes the body to crave the substance more, and eventually alters the way the brain reacts to these chemicals. The reason that drug addictions are called ‘diseases’ is because since the brain has become altered from drugs, the resulting compulsive behavior overrides the ability to control impulses, therefore making it a “relapsing disease.”

You chose this.

You chose to smoke the weed.

You chose to shoot up heroin.

You chose to snort cocaine.

You chose to buy prescription pills that you did not need.

You chose this.

I can’t express how much it infuriates me when drug addicts have the audacity to play the ‘oh poor me’ role, blaming their choices on a disease that they brought on themselves. That child in the cancer ward didn’t choose to do something that brought on their cancer, that woman with cystic fibrosis didn’t do something to bring it upon herself.

Every drug addict made a choice, so don’t tell me you have a disease all because you chose to do something you knew wasn’t right. Could you really look a child, stricken with cancer, in the eyes and tell them you also have a disease, that you’re also sick, but that unlike them, you made choices that led you to where you are, while they didn’t? Take some personal responsibility and own up to it, but don’t you dare go around telling people you have this so called disease that YOU created.

I’ve seen firsthand what addiction can do, who it hurts and how it destroys. I’ve watched enablers cosset the addict, consistently making up excuses as to why that person is an addict, why they can’t quit, and best of all; why they have a disease and should be treated as such. But enablers are not the problem, it’s the manipulator — who is the drug addict. They manipulate others to believe in their lies, to believe that they are indeed diseased and therefore can not quit because it’s a sickness. Have we, as a society, become so blatantly oblivious to basic manipulation tactics that we fail to see that drug addicts have made this ‘disease’ for themselves as a means to escape personal responsibility?

The reason this bothers me so much isn’t because I watch these addicts throw away their life, while someone is sitting in a hospital bed clinging onto their last breath, wishing that just for a moment they were healthy, that they didn’t have to face the chances that they would be dead within months. It bothers me because of the label we have given to addicts, making them believe they have an actual disease that they didn’t ask for, because let’s be real, what person asks for Cancer, Cystic Fibrosis, Ulcerative Colitis, or Multiple Sclerosis?

So please, stop playing the victim role thinking you have a disease that you brought on yourself because of your choices. Stop crying the blues because you screwed up and want the world to take pity. And for the love of God, STOP acting like you are as sick as a cancer patient!*

*I’ve seen plenty of people do this.

If you do some research on the author of this “piece” .. here is her FB page https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100011796819424 and she started at Fordham University in 2016..  so she is MAYBE 20 ? But why is she seemingly SO BITTER towards people who abuse some substance… apparently those who are addicted/abusing Alcohol and Tobacco/Nicotine does not register on her “addict radar”.

What to me is really disturbing is 324,000 SHARES of this extremely biased article… might even want to refer to it as a very bigoted diatribe.

 

DEA BS: Prescription Drug Take Back Helps Curb Opioid Addiction

DEA Prescription Drug Take Back Helps Curb Opioid Addiction

http://www.topix.com/us/dea/2017/04/dea-prescription-drug-take-back-helps-curb-opioid-addiction

In the garage at Kenmore Mercy Hospital, volunteers are sifting through and cataloging thousands of prescription pills. They’re pills collected as part the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Prescription Drug Take Back Day .

National Drug Take Back Day

https://www.drugs.com/article/medication-disposal.html

DEA began hosting National Prescription Drug Take-Back events in 2010. At the previous 12 Take-Back Day events, millions pounds of unwanted, unneeded or expired medications were surrendered for safe and proper disposal. At the Take-Back Day in May 2016 over 5,400 sites spread across the nation collected unwanted medications.

So if the DEA has had 12 take back events over the last 7-8 yrs and it is to help curb opiate addiction…  Someone must have forgotten to tell all those people who are ODing… in dramatically increasing numbers !

Maybe part of the problem is that typically about 90% of the meds turned in for disposal are NOT CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES...

Since 2012, the number of opiate prescriptions written/filled has been decreasing EVERY YEAR… and the DEA has even reduced the production quotas for pharmaceutical manufacturers (brand and generic) has been recently reduced up to 35% .

Does the typical media outlet just mindlessly print whatever the DEA pushes out as press releases about the numbers involved in abuse/addiction to opiates ?  Here is the website https://www.dea.gov/pr/news.shtml  where the DEA has archived all the press releases that the HQ and 25 regional offices have sent out since 2002.

Like we have seen with the CDC, when is the media going to WAKE UP and realize that the statically data coming from the various Federal/State bureaucracies …. may or may not have anything to do with reality. Are all of these FACTOIDS being disseminated intentionally to serve a certain agenda of the particular bureaucratic entity ?

 

 

Drug Middleman Could Be Charging You More Than Your Medicine Costs

I-Team: Drug Middleman Could Be Charging You More Than Your Medicine Costs

www.boston.cbslocal.com/2017/04/28/i-team-drug-middleman-charging-more-medicine-costs-pharmacy/

ROCKLAND (CBS)- Amy Frostland works hard as a waitress to help support her two young boys. And even though her husband gets health insurance through his job, it still takes a big bite out of their budget.

“Health Insurance is ridiculous,” she said.

That is why Amy was stunned when she realized that expensive insurance was not helping her when it comes to paying for her medication.

iteam drug cost I Team: Drug Middleman Could Be Charging You More Than Your Medicine Costs

Amy Frostland speaking about her family’s health insurance. (WBZ-TV)

“If I run my insurance, it’s going to cost me $90 for a three month supply; if I do it without insurance, it is $10 for a three month supply,” she explained.

“It’s a huge problem,” said Todd Brown of the Massachusetts Association of Independent Pharmacists.

Brown says much of the blame lies with pharmacy benefit managers, or PMBs. They act as middlemen between insurance companies and pharmacists to process your prescriptions.

They negotiate prices with drug manufacturers and they handle all the patient claims.

Brown said these little known companies are making billions of dollars in profits.

“When you look at the profit these companies make, it’s excessive. It’s inconsistent with the rest of the health care industry,” he explained.

iteam drug cost1 I Team: Drug Middleman Could Be Charging You More Than Your Medicine Costs

Pills from a pharmacy. (WBZ-TV)

So how are they making that money? Two class actions suits, one of which was filed in Connecticut, claim it is coming from your co-payment.

“It’s really more of a “you-pay” than co-pay,” said Bob Izard, a Connecticut attorney working on both lawsuits.

Here’s an example from one of the lawsuits in which a Massachusetts woman is the lead plaintiff:

An insurance plan requires a $20 co-payment on all prescription drugs. But the price owed to the pharmacy for the medicine is on $1.75. The suit alleges the PMB pockets the change of $18.25, which is called a ‘clawback’.

“We describe it as basically a massive fraud,” Izzard said.

According to the lawsuits, this is not about high-priced designer drugs.

It involves common, relatively inexpensive drugs millions of people take every day like the antibiotic Azithromycin, the blood pressure medication Lisinopril and cholesterol drugs like the generic form of Lipitor, Atorvastatin.

iteam drug cost2 I Team: Drug Middleman Could Be Charging You More Than Your Medicine Costs

Pills being dispensed. (WBZ-TV)

Patients are largely in the dark about this and the suit alleges the PBMs go to great lengths to make sure it stays that way.

“Pharmacies are prohibited from talking to patients about how much a patient would pay if they just pay cash and didn’t go through their insurance,” Brown explained.

The I-Team reached out to an industry group, a spokesperson for the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association. They said,“Patients should not have to pay more than a network drugstore’s submitted charges to the health plan.”

But when we asked them to clarify, the spokesperson never responded.

Amy says she overpaid by hundreds of dollars for years. “I thought it was robbery, absolute robbery,” she said.

So how do you avoid overpaying? You can call your pharmacy and ask what the cash price for the drug is.

You can either pay that cash price or call your insurance company and ask why are paying more than the drug costs.

The PBM industry came on the scene in late 1969… the new UAW contract with Ford, Chevrolet, Chrysler, International Harvester and John Deere “created” this MIDDLEMAN that inserted itself in the retail/community prescription medication system.

Prior to this time, all pts paid CASH for their prescriptions or “store charge” and 2/3 of the community pharmacies (abt 45,000) were  neighborhood “independent pharmacies”.  The pt submitted their receipts to their insurance company for reimbursement.

The average prescription price was $4-$5 and there were virtually NO GENERICS and prescriptions were abt 6% of overall healthcare costs. Wholesale prices from the brand name Pharma’s were virtually “static”. Back then, Pharmacists had to manually calculate the retail price from the wholesale prices… wholesale prices were so stable many Pharmacists had memorized the wholesale cost, especially on the “fast movers”…  Pharmacy wholesalers worked on a 18%-20%  gross profit and community pharmacies worked on a 40%-50% gross profit. Everyone made money, and pts got taken care of … even if they didn’t have the money to pay on a particular day.

Won’t bore you with the details from then to now… but today… PBM industries is dominated by five major players https://www.verywell.com/top-5-pharmacy-benefits-managers-2663840  that control/manage 50%+ of all prescriptions paid for by a PBM. Today, 85%-90% of all prescriptions are paid for thru a PBM and today 85%-90% of all prescriptions are GENERICS… and the average prescription prices is pushing $60.00.

Retail/Community pharmacies are working on < 20% GROSS PROFIT and wholesalers are working on abt 6% GROSS PROFIT and prescriptions are now abt 12% of all medical care costs.

If one applies the CPI (Consumer Price Index) and/or COLA ( Cost of living adjustment) to that average Rx price back in 1970.. today one would expect the average Rx price to be in the $30 range.  That would presume that all prescriptions are brand name and all pts paid cash and submit their own claims to their insurance company for reimbursement.

Everything since 1970 was done to save pt and the system money… generics are suppose to be less expensive and the PBM’s would expedite claim processing..

So why is the average prescription price is 50% to 100% higher than would otherwise be expected ?  Back in 1970, nearly all insurance companies were “mutual companies”… they were owned by their policy holders and were not for profit entities…  During the 90’s most insurance companies – demutalized – becoming publicly held – FOR PROFIT – entities.  It is claimed today that these for profit insurance companies … 20%-30% of every premium dollar paid to them is CONSUMED by their corporate infrastructure and profit goals… to help keep the stock market and stockholders happy.

The PBM’s are also FOR-PROFIT companies… they have moved on past their original purpose…It has been reported that PBM’s tell the Pharma’s that if they want their medication on the PBM’s “approved formulary” the Pharma needs to pay a rebate/kickback to the PBM’s… some have reported that could be up to 70% of the wholesale price of the product.  The “BIG BOYS” are even suing each other over the “sharing” all of these kickbacks/rebates   http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/03/21/471301872/anthem-sues-express-scripts-for-a-bigger-slice-of-drug-savings

Some point out how much less that the Veterans Administration pays for medications but the VA has no middlemen like insurance companies and PBM’s  and their infrastructure overhead and focus on making a profit. Some believe that the various middlemen in the pharmaceutical medication distribution system consume some 40% -50% of every dollar paid to them to support their infrastructure cost and desire to make a profit.

The reason that our healthcare system is so costly… seems quite clear ?

 

 

Yes, people can die from opiate withdrawal

Yes, people can die from opiate withdrawal

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.13512/full

It is generally thought that opiate withdrawal is unpleasant but not life-threatening, but death can, and does, occur. The complications of withdrawal are often underestimated and monitored inadequately. It is essential that clinical management programmes are put in place routinely in jails, prisons and other facilities where withdrawal is likely in order to avert these avoidable deaths.

Death is an uncommon, but catastrophic, outcome of opioid withdrawal. The complications of the clinical management of withdrawal are often underestimated and monitored inadequately. In this commentary we highlight the under-reported risk of death, discuss deaths that occurred during opioid withdrawal in United States and British custodial settings and explore implications for clinical management.

The opioid withdrawal syndrome is well-delineated [1]. Signs and symptoms include dysphoria, insomnia, pupillary dilation, piloerection, yawning, muscle aches, lacrimation, rhinorrhea, nausea, fever, sweating, vomiting and diarrhoea. For short-acting opioids, such as heroin, symptom severity peaks typically at around 2–3 days. The syndrome is generally characterized as a flu-like illness, subjectively severe but objectively mild, that stands in stark contrast to the life-threatening benzodiazepine and alcohol withdrawal syndromes. Indeed, it is often said and, was stated publicly by one prominent medical practitioner, that ‘…no one dies of opiate withdrawal’ [2].

How could someone die during opiate withdrawal? The answer lies in the final two clinical signs presented above, vomiting and diarrhoea. Persistent vomiting and diarrhoea may result, if untreated, in dehydration, hypernatraemia (elevated blood sodium level) and resultant heart failure. There are documented cases of such deaths occurring during the withdrawal process, all in jail settings, that date back to the late 1990s. In 1998, Judith McGlinchey was incarcerated in the United Kingdom and went into heroin withdrawal [3]. She exhibited persistent vomiting, sudden weight loss and dehydration. The cause of death was attributed to hypoxic brain damage caused by a cardiac arrest. A case of failure of duty of care was argued successfully before the European Court of Human Rights. Recent years have seen a number of similar cases reported in the public press between 2013 and 2016 that occurred in United States jails. We are aware of 10 such reported cases, six females and four males, ranging in age from 18 to 49 years [Supporting information, Appendix S1].

All such deaths are preventable, given appropriate medical management. In each case the process of death appeared prolonged, with ample time to treat the person successfully. Why, then, did they occur? These were cases of neglect, or a lack of medical resources to support the individual. Intravenous re-hydration, for instance, is not regarded as appropriate in non-health-care settings. There is a failure to identify the seriousness of the level of dehydration, and to assume that a quiet prisoner is a good prisoner. Jails process more drug withdrawals than any other single institution, but often do not have medical resources to manage severe withdrawal. Indeed, one study of US jails found that only a quarter had alcohol or drug detoxification services [4].

There is an urgent need to raise awareness of the risk of a fatal outcome in the presence of poor clinical governance. People can, and do, die from opiate withdrawal. The recent substantial increases in heroin use in the United States [5] make the management of heroin withdrawal a major clinical issue for the correctional system, as opiate users comprise more than a substantial proportion prison populations [6]. Moreover, as jails are the entry point to the correctional system, they are the most likely to have to deal with acute withdrawal among opioid-dependent inmates.

Can anything be done? Withdrawal protocols for jails exist in the United States [7]. Despite this, the medical management of withdrawal is often described as suboptimal by heroin-dependent inmates [8]. In the cases of the reported deaths in jails this was clearly so. Opiate withdrawal needs to be recognized within the correctional system, and elsewhere, as potentially life-threatening and managed accordingly. This is of particular importance for jails, which are short-stay, local facilities where a heroin user may be incarcerated within an hour of being arrested on the street.

An alternative to withdrawal is to provide opiate substitution therapy to opiate-dependent inmates entering the correctional system. The provision of treatment in such settings has been implemented successfully in many jurisdictions, and is associated with lower mortality rates and better clinical outcomes post-release than those who are opioid-dependent at entry and have an enforced withdrawal [9, 10]. One recent study reported that continued maintenance treatment was associated with a 93% reduction of risk of death in custody during a 10-year period [10]. Similar action providing effective drug treatment is required across custodial settings. This is particularly so for the United States, given the recent epidemic of heroin and opioid dependence, as the number of heroin users entering jails and prison will, in all probability, increase substantially in coming years.

Heroin withdrawal is not a trivial matter. The rising number of deaths from withdrawal in United States jails has received scant attention to date. Given appropriate clinical management, such deaths need not occur.

Bureaucrats: will they listen to common sense ???

Local doctor/pharmacist request council reconsider drug suit

http://williamsondailynews.com/news/10897/local-doctorpharmacist-request-council-reconsider-drug-suit

WILLIAMSON – A local pharmacist and physician approached the Williamson City Council at Thursday’s meeting to request that the city reconsider a recent decision to join litigation against wholesale pharmaceutical distribution companies.

The Williamson City Council voted in favor of joining the drug distribution suit at a special meeting held March 17, 2017. At that meeting, Williamson Councilman York Smith made a motion to obtain the law office of T. Chafin (Truman and Letitia Chafin) to represent the city of Williamson in a lawsuit against major wholesale pharmaceutical companies. The motion was seconded and passed with a vote of 3-0. Councilman Matthew Newsome was not present at the special meeting.

At Thursday’s regular meeting of the Williamson City Council, local pharmacist Nicole McNamee approached the council during public comment to request that the city reconsider the decision to join the lawsuit against drug companies.

“I am the owner of Hurley Drug in Williamson and I am here today to talk to you about the drug distribution lawsuit that the city has joined. I wanted to point out a few things that I think everybody needs to know. It will be detrimental to local businesses and health care providers in our city. I know that you all were told that it would not involve local businesses,” McNamee stated.

McNamee used current proceedings underway in McDowell County, W.Va. McDowell County was one of the first in many counties and municipalities that have joined litigation against drug distribution companies. “It is clear that the lawsuit would have to include all the people supply chain which would start with the manufacturers, the drug wholesalers who deliver to pharmacies and prescribers write the prescriptions and you have patients that get the prescriptions. It would have to involve all of those people to be able to show the full scope of the issue.”

McNamee concluded stating, “I am here to ask you all to reconsider joining the lawsuit because I think it will bring businesses and health care providers into this. We are the people that are in the City of Williamson right now. We pay Business and Occupation taxes (B and O) and we are active members of the community. The problems that we have had in the past are gone and the people that are left here are going to be the ones drug into this either right or wrong. I am asking you to reconsider your position on joining that lawsuit.”

Local physician Dr. Donovan (Dino) Beckett also spoke to the Williamson City Council. Beckett’s comments to council were made after the regular meeting had adjourned. At that time, a council member noticed Beckett in the audience, apologized for failing to call on him and asked if he would like to speak. Beckett also requested that the council reconsider their decision to join the drug distribution lawsuit.

“Business owners will have to hire attorneys and incur a lot of legal costs for things that will be detrimental for the image of the city and the potential of out of pocket cost for legal fees. When you are trying to make ends meet and then you have to deal with something of that nature, that is not going to anything for B and O takes for businesses that are in existence now that we are going to be able to create over a five year period. We would like the council to take that into consideration when looking at that possibility,” Beckett stated.

Williamson Mayor Robert Carlton responded stating, “We are looking at that. We have received information and council will eventually address that in an executive session. I do want to say how much we respect what both of you (Beckett and McNamee) do for the city. Keep up the good work; especially all the nonprofit stuff you are doing,” Carlton said.

Beckett thanked Carlton and stated, “Well, we need some for profit things too.”

The Williamson City Council meets on the second and fourth Thursday each month at 6 p.m. in Council Chambers at Williamson City Hall.

Courtney Harrison is a news reporter for the Williamson Daily News. She can be contacted at charrison@civitasmedia.com or at 304-235-4242 ext. 2279.

Chronic fatigue syndrome linked with differences in gut bacteria

A study found that people with chronic fatigue syndrome had higher levels of certain gut bacteria and lower levels of others compared to healthy people who didn't have the condition.Chronic fatigue syndrome linked with differences in gut bacteria

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2017/04/28/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-linked-with-differences-in-gut-bacteria.html

People with chronic fatigue syndrome may have imbalances in their gut bacteria, a new study suggests.

The study found that people with chronic fatigue syndrome had higher levels of certain gut bacteria and lower levels of others compared to healthy people who didn’t have the condition.

The researchers then checked to see if these imbalances also characterized the subset of patients in the study who had irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), an intestinal disorder that is common in people with chronic fatigue syndrome. Results showed that patients did indeed have different patterns of gut bacteria disturbances depending on whether they had only chronic fatigue syndrome or both chronic fatigue syndrome and IBS.

The findings suggest that researchers may be able to divide chronic fatigue syndrome patients into different groups depending on their gut bacteria imbalances, which could aid in the diagnosis and treatment of the disease, the researchers said. 

Chronic fatigue syndrome is a disorder in which people have extreme fatigue that is not improved by rest and is not the result of another medical condition. An estimated 35 percent to 90 percent of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome also report abdominal discomfort consistent with symptoms of IBS, the researchers said.

The reason for the link between chronic fatigue syndrome and IBS is not clear; chronic fatigue syndrome may predispose patents to developing IBS, or the two conditions might share underlying causes, the researchers said.

Previous studies have already found district differences in gut bacteria in chronic fatigue syndrome patients compared to healthy people. But the new study is one of the first to look for differences between gut bacteria in chronic fatigue syndrome patients who have IBS and bacteria in those who do not have IBS.

The researchers analyzed fecal samples from 50 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and 50 healthy people who did not have the condition. Nearly half of the chronic fatigue syndrome patients, 21 out of 50, also had IBS.

The researchers found that differences in the levels of six types of gut bacteria — Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, Dorea, Coprococcus, Clostridium, Ruminococcus and Coprobacillu — were strongly linked with chronic fatigue syndrome. In fact, the relative abundance of these species in participants’ guts could be used to predict whether the patients had chronic fatigue syndrome, the researchers said.

In addition, researchers found that people with chronic fatigue syndrome and IBS had higher levels of a type of bacteria called Alistipes and lower levels of a type of bacteria called Faecalibacterium. Meanwhile the patients who had chronic fatigue syndrome but not IBShad higher levels of a genus of bacteria called Bacteroides but lower amounts of a specific species in this genus called Bacteroides vulgatus.

Some researchers have hypothesized that altered gut bacteria may play a role in the causing chronic fatigue syndrome, because some research shows that a person’s gut bacteria may affect their central nervous system and immune system. However, it’s also possible that changes in gut bacteria are a consequence of having chronic fatigue syndrome.

Future studies should look further into gastrointestinal symptoms and their relation to gut bacteria disturbances in people with chronic fatigue syndrome, the researchers said.

It’s possible that one day researchers could use information about a patient’s gut bacteria, the metabolic pathways that those bacteria are involved in and the immune molecules present in the blood to more accurately diagnosis people with chronic fatigue syndrome and develop more specific treatments for the condition, the researchers said.

The study was published online April 26 in the journal Microbiome.

 

Could “safe consumption sites” help the heroin epidemic in the US?

Could “safe consumption sites” help the heroin epidemic in the US?

http://www.clinicaladvisor.com/the-waiting-room/safe-consumption-sites-could-help-the-heroin-epidemic-in-the-us/article/651906/

As heroin use continues to take an increasing toll on American lives, public health leaders are looking for novel ideas to address the epidemic. “Safe consumption sites” are medically-supervised venues where heroin users can inject heroin in clean, safe, and medically-supervised facilities, and where overdose prevention medication (naloxone) is ready for use if needed.

While not new in international settings (Vancouver utilizes this approach), to date there are no safe consumption sites in the United States. Seattle is currently considering such a program, and it has prompted much discussion and some opposition.

Those opposed to safe consumption sites typically voice concerns about these facilities increasing heroin use, with the assumption that safe places to use heroin will bring more users. Some feel that this approach validates heroin use, sending the message to users that it’s fine to keep using heroin. Other common concerns are that this approach will result in increased drug use in the vicinity of the sites, and that making heroin use easier will decrease the number of heroin users interested in seeking the care of opioid treatment programs.

A review of the literature shows little evidence supporting these concerns, and offers evidence that in Canada and Australia, safe consumption sites have not had the negative impacts cited. There also appears to be no reduction in admission to opioid treatment programs.

While in Seattle there appears to be wide-spread consensus among political and policy leaders about moving forward with these facilities, it remains to be seen whether such a consensus can trump the strongly held beliefs of citizens opposing this harm-reduction-based approach to the opioid use epidemic.

People in central Indiana have one less choice of where to get their Rxs filled

Marsh to close all pharmacies after selling their pharmacy business to CVS

http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/marsh-to-close-all-pharmacies-after-selling-their-business-to-cvs

VIDEO ON LINK

INDIANAPOLIS — Marsh Supermarkets announced Friday that they will be closing all of their pharmacies after they were sold to CVS.

The sale will affect 37 Marsh pharmacies.

Marsh pharmacies will close over a three-day period beginning May 3. All prescription information and inventory will be transferred to CVS during that time, according to a spokesperson for the company. 

The news comes amid a flurry of store closures across the state because of ‘weak performances.’

MAP | Marsh store closures in Indiana in 2017

The company announced last week that they would be closing seven locations by the middle of May.

A Marsh spokesperson said current Marsh pharmacy customers will be notified by CVS when their prescriptions are transferred and by signs in the Marsh stores about where their nearest location will be.

A spokesperson for CVS released the following statement:

“CVS and Marsh will work together to ensure that pharmacy patients experience a seamless transition with no interruption of service. Each Marsh location will have signage with the location of the nearest CVS Pharmacy. However, any CVS Pharmacy location will be able to fill prescriptions for Marsh’s pharmacy patients.”  

RELATED | Marsh to close seven more locations by mid-MayMarsh to close longtime Indianapolis store at the end of January | Marsh is closing another Indianapolis store at the end of February | Marsh to close two more Indy stores by mid-April; that makes four in 2017 | Greenfield, Indy Marsh stores closing in May