Making “addicts” functioning on Suboxone is better than any other opiate ?

Opioid Epidemic Spurs Rethink on Medication and Addiction

Use of medication-assisted treatment is increasing

http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/Addictions/57265?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2016-04-11&eun=g578717d0r

Most addicts after a couple of years no longer get “high”… they  use the term “dope sick” to refer to cold turkey withdrawal and their existence becomes centered around warding off becoming “dope sick”..  In the process of realizing that “addicts/junkie” are really those suffering from the chronic mental health disease of addictive personality disorder.  So down they are treating/maintaining these people with Suboxone .. a C-III medication… so instead of being dependent on Heroin – which metabolizes into Morphine in the body… we are now having these people DEPENDENT on a C-III medication. So should there really be any difference in a person maintained and functioning on Suboxone or some other controlled medication ?  Other than Suboxone therapy is an “APPROVED” therapy by the over-ruling bureaucracy ?

Drug treatment providers in California and elsewhere have relied for decades on abstinence and therapy to treat addicts. In recent years, they’ve turned to medication.

Faced with a worsening opiate epidemic and rising numbers of overdose deaths, policymakers are ramping up medication-assisted treatment.

President Barack Obama last week said he’d allocate more money for states to expand access to the medications. He also proposed that physicians be able to prescribe one of the most effective anti-addiction drugs, buprenorphine, to more patients.

California already plans to expand access to medications as it launches an overhaul of the state’s substance abuse treatment system for low-income residents. The state recently embarked on a 5-year demonstration project on the premise that addiction is a chronic disease and should be treated as such.

While medication is not for everyone, it can be critical for some people with severe addiction, said Marlies Perez, chief of the substance use disorder compliance division for the state Department of Health Care Services. The medications, she said, “have been proven as the gold standard for really helping people recover.”

The best-known medication, methadone, blocks the effect of certain drugs and lessens withdrawal symptoms. It is highly regulated and can only be prescribed by clinics that have government approval. Buprenorphine, which can be prescribed in doctors’ offices, produces mild opioid effects while also easing withdrawal symptoms. Another medication available by prescription, naltrexone, blocks the effect of opioids.

The medications are available across the country, but must be prescribed by physicians with special training. There are only about 30,000 authorized doctors nationwide, and they can only prescribe to a limited number of patients.

Obama’s proposal would allow qualified doctors to prescribe buprenorphine to 200 patients, up from 100.

That could make a big difference in California, Perez said. The state is also trying to better link treatment centers with trained prescribing doctors so that physicians can consult with one another on treatment options for their patients. “Not all physicians, even in the substance use field, have that clinical knowledge,” she said.

The use of medication in treatment conflicts with the 12-step and Narcotics Anonymous philosophy of addiction recovery, which is based on abstinence, experts said. For many, experts said, simple abstinence doesn’t work.

“You would hope that just by talking to somebody, they could get rid of their problem with drugs,” said James Sorensen, a University of California, San Francisco professor and interim director of the substance abuse and addiction medicine program at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital. “The reality is, that is simply not efficient, so we look for other tools.”

Medication is one of the most successful, evidence-based treatments available, and more access should have a big impact on those with substance abuse disorders, said John Connolly, deputy director for substance abuse prevention and control for the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. But, he cautioned medication should be used alongside more traditional treatment methods.

“The medication has tremendous effect, but it is most impactful when it is prescribed with the necessary counseling and social supports,” he said.

Stephen Kaplan, director of behavioral health and recovery services for San Mateo County, said the county has increased its use of medication. About 2 years ago, the county began a pilot project to prescribe naltrexone to people with severe alcoholism who hadn’t been successful in traditional treatment.

The medication reduced people’s cravings and drinking, Kaplan said. The county recently began expanding the project to include people with opiate addictions.

Kaplan said he respects providers who believe that replacing one drug with another is not true recovery. But from a policy standpoint, Kaplan said, the medications are effective and should be more integrated into overall recovery for people with substance abuse disorders.

“We need to make available to them every possible option,” he said.

Perez of the state Department of Health Care Services said she believes that Obama’s focus on the opiate epidemic — and his recognition that it is a disease and not a moral failing — helps reduce the stigma.

“That makes a huge difference in folks coming forward and looking for treatment,” she said.

5 Responses

  1. Wonderful these experts acknowledge that a variety of treatment options including methadone and suboxone for addiction treatment should be available but why can’t they see as I do the absolute hypocrisy that is being presented over and over as these are NARCOTICS, and the expert Kolodney even states addicts may be on these for life. Does anyone else see how ridiculous this has become?

  2. “So should there really be any difference in a person maintained and functioning on Suboxone or some other controlled medication?”

    Bravo, Steve (Emily & Robert, bravo to both of you as well). This is what pisses me off to no end! The blatant hypocrisy of our government, Kolodny (who btw is a prescriber of Suboxone – not just for withdrawal, but also as “maintenance”.), and all the other useless over-paid bureaucrats.

    So it’s fine and dandy to give a recovering addict an opioid medication, which is a class of meds specifically for reducing physical pain, to keep their cravings down, yet completely unacceptable to give a chronic pain patient, who is actually suffering from LEGITIMATE PHYSICAL PAIN, an opioid medication that will actually help to alleviate their legitimate physical pain!

    Even better – our tax dollars are paying for this crap!! So while so many legitimate pain patients are left suffering and having even more difficulty accessing those opioid medications that they, themselves, would have to pay for and would help alleviate some of their pain, their tax dollars will be spent to give addicts even more access to the opioid medication. Seriously, if that doesn’t take the cake, I don’t know what does. I don’t have trust in any of our politicians at this point, but I literally can’t wait to vote these scum out of office!

    (For the record, I have no problem with medication maintenance therapy – bup, methadone, and even pharm-produced heroin – being available, accessible and affordable – but they’d better do the same for us chronic pain patients. This unabashed, disgusting display of hypocrisy is what I have a huge problem with.)

  3. Those “40k” opiate deaths… if you discount the ones from METHADONE it is then 23k. This is absurd and just another money maker.

    • Anyone who tells you there are 40k opiate deaths did not read the data collated by the CDC carefully enough. The number is actually “more than 28,000 in 2014,” and that number includes heroin. And also methadone. Well over half of those overdose deaths were multiple drug toxicity, and it is not at all clear to me that opoiods are not being unfairly demonized in this debate. The rest of the 40,000+ includes all drug poisonings, some of which don’t even involve controlled substances I think (like tylenol toxicity, for instance). Not to mention, Kentucky, which has it worse than any other state in the union . . . wanna guess what it takes to be an elected coroner in rural areas of Kentucky?

      http://coroners.ky.gov/Career+Development.htm (coroners are elected, and have to complete a 40 hour course to be able to make determination of the cause of death).

      http://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/

      As for “epidemic,” I gave it some thought the other day and could only think of one person I knew who ever died in a car accident. Then my father reminded me of one other – he was a year ahead of me in school. This is what an epidemic of overdose deaths = number of car wreck deaths looks like to me. Is this really an “epidemic?”

      This is an absurd debate, not worth having, but when has that ever stopped us in this country? And anyone who tells you opioids don’t work for pain? Then why are they okay for cancer patients and dying people? If all the studies show they are useless for pain, why are they good for any patient at all?

      Myra Christopher & Jim Cleary – The State of Palliative Care: What Can We Do Together?
      https://youtu.be/yTa1t8WMH7o

      • Yeah that’s why I use quotes. The statistics are skewed and the CDC even admits it. It’s kinda really sad and would be funny if a bunch of honest people weren’t suffering because of it.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from PHARMACIST STEVE

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading