Usually when I ask a AI prgm a question, the answer it provides causes me to have another question.

This is just one such situation that I asked the AI prgm a question and ended up asking two more questions.

This started by asking what should/could a pt do when the practitioner reduced/stopped the pt’s pain meds and the pt’s normal BP increases to hypertensive crisis level. Since the majority of practitioners are employees of large hospital systems, this is the premise that I used.

There are three hyperlinks below are the questions and answer from this interchange with a AI. The top hyperlink is the first question asked.

As you read these responses from the AI prgm. If you haven’t had your daily dose so opioids cut yet, it is just a matter of time. Remember that large hospitals don’t like bad news/publicity. You are not the only one that is getting their opioids taken away, and if still are getting your opioids, it may be just a matter of time before you do.

Law firms like to find some entities that are harming people and they have deep pockets, the more people the entity is harming, the better the law firm will listen.

I had a Pharmacist friend that had worked for CVS for about 40 yrs and he had MS and he decided to sue CVS over three federal issues, ADA violation, & it has been too long for me to remember the other two. When told me that he had found a law firm and was filing the lawsuit. I told him at the time if he walked away with less than EIGHT FIGURES (10 million) I would be surprised.  It never went to trial but at a second mediation there was a settlement.

Of course, he had a non-disclosure agreement, but he never denied that the settlement was more than EIGHT FIGURE that he would walk away with.

I think that the answers from the AI prgm are good and it gave some pro and cons of various options a  chronic pain pt could take from a legal perspective.

Document

Filed under: General Problems