Another Fed agency piling on fighting the opiate epidemic ?

pilingonFDA Unveils Sweeping Changes to Opioid Policies

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/858411?nlid=99105_3901&src=wnl_newsalrt_160204_MSCPEDIT&uac=75309AG&impID=980959&faf=1

In response to the ongoing opioid abuse epidemic, top officials at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today announced plans to reassess the agency’s approach to opioid medications.

We are determined to help defeat this epidemic through a science-based and continuously evolving approach,” Robert Califf, MD, the FDA’s Deputy Commissioner for Medical Products and Tobacco, said in a news release. “This plan contains real measures this agency can take to make a difference in the lives of so many people who are struggling under the weight of this terrible crisis.”

The FDA statement says the multicomponent plan will focus on policies aimed at reversing the epidemic, while still providing pain patients access to effective medication. Specifically, the FDA plans to:

* Re-examine the risk-benefit paradigm for opioids and ensure that the agency considers their wider public-health effects;

* Convene an expert advisory committee before approving any new drug application for an opioid that does not have abuse-deterrent properties;

* Assemble and consult with the Pediatric Advisory Committee regarding a framework for pediatric opioid labeling before any new labeling is approved;

* Develop changes to immediate-release opioid labeling, including additional warnings and safety information that incorporate elements similar to those of the extended-release/long-acting (ER/LA) opioid analgesics labeling that is currently required;

* Update Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy requirements for opioids after considering advisory committee recommendations and review of existing requirements;

* Expand access to, and encourage the development of, abuse-deterrent formulations of opioid products;

* Improve access to naloxone and medication-assisted treatment options for patients with opioid-use disorders; and

* Support better pain-management options, including alternative treatments.

The FDA says they will seek guidance from outside experts in the fields of pain management and drug abuse. The agency has already asked the National Academy of Medicine to assist in developing a framework for opioid review, approval, and monitoring that balances an individual’s need for pain control with considerations of the broader public-health consequences of opioid misuse and abuse.

 

The FDA says it will convene independent advisory committees made up of physicians and other experts when considering approval of any new opioid drug that does not contain abuse-deterrent properties. The agency will also convene a meeting of its standing Pediatric Advisory Committee to provide advice on a framework for pediatric opioid labeling and use of opioid pain medications in children.

The FDA also plans to tighten requirements for drug companies to generate postmarket data on the long-term impact of using ER/LA opioids, an action, they say, that will generate the “most comprehensive data ever collected in the field of pain medicine and treatments for opioid use disorder. The data will further the understanding of the known serious risks of opioid misuse, abuse, overdose and death.”

Drug overdose deaths, driven largely by overdose from prescription opioids and illicit drugs like heroin and illegally-made fentanyl, are now the leading cause of injury death in the United States.

 

“Things are getting worse, not better, with the epidemic of opioid misuse, abuse and dependence,” Dr Califf said. “It’s time we all took a step back to look at what is working and what we need to change to impact this crisis.”

“Agencies from across the Department of Health and Human Services and throughout the federal government are united in aggressively addressing this public health crisis,” US Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Sylvia M. Burwell, said in the news release. “The FDA is a vital component to combating this epidemic, and the innovation and modernization they have committed to undertaking is an important part of the overall efforts at HHS.”

Last spring, HHS announced a major initiative to address the opioid abuse epidemic in the US. The initiative focuses on informing opioid prescribing practices, increasing the use of naloxone, and using medication-assisted treatment to move people out of opioid addiction.

 

The FDA says it will provide updates on progress with the goal of sharing timely, transparent information on a regular basis.

 

56 page$ of DEA civil forfeiture$ for 2-3 month$

OfficialNotification

click on link above to read all 56 pages

The DEA gets to keep/sell all of the assets they seize … and abt 85% of the assets seized there is never charges filed nor conviction made.. and most people will get little – to nothing – of their assets returned.

political leaders in MASS believe it was needed for them to start practicing medicine without a license

Shit-Hits-the-Fan_cartoon

Massachusetts Leads the Way on Opioid Overdose Fight, but Will Pain Patients Suffer?

http://www.painmedicinenews.com/Policy-Management/Article/02-16/Massachusetts-Leads-the-Way-on-Opioid-Overdose-Fight-but-Will-Pain-Patients-Suffer-/35168/ses=ogst

Boston—Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker has signed into law new legislation that will significantly regulate how opioid analgesics are prescribed and how the widespread problem of opioid abuse is addressed within the state.

Although the pain care community generally welcomes the changes, there are concerns that the new regulations—and other initiatives recently implemented within the state—will have negative implications for people with chronic pain who have a legitimate need for the powerful drugs. However, political leaders in the state believe a legislative response was needed after a state report issued in 2014 revealed that 668 Massachusetts residents died from unintentional opioid overdoses in 2012 (the number of fatal overdoses reported in the state increased by 90% between 2000 and 2012).

According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1,162 state residents died as a result of opioid overdose in 2014, the most recent year for which data are available (an 18.8% increase over 2013). To put that in perspective, Massachusetts had more than three times as many opioid-related fatalities as car accident deaths in 2014.
ADVERTISEMENT

“Thanks to input and support from medical and law enforcement professionals, I was pleased to file landmark substance misuse legislation, and look forward to working with the legislature around further efforts to stem the flow of addictive prescription opioids,” Gov. Baker said in a statement issued to Pain Medicine News.

The bill approved by the state House represents a compromise between the legislature and the governor’s office, after the latter had submitted a proposed bill to both houses of the state legislature late last year. According to media reports, Gov. Baker’s proposal, called STEP (Substance use Treatment, Education and Prevention), would have limited initial opiate painkiller prescriptions to three days and allowed physicians to commit a person involuntarily to a drug treatment facility for up to 72 hours if he or she is considered an immediate danger to himself or herself, or others.

The state House version, however, limits initial opiate painkiller prescriptions to a seven-day supply and requires anyone who shows up in an emergency room with an opiate-related overdose to undergo an in-depth evaluation by a licensed medical professional. According to sources in the field, the state House bill reflects changes proposed by pain management specialists and other clinicians, who have acted as de facto advocates for chronic pain sufferers with legitimate needs for opioid treatment.

When contacted by Pain Medicine News, Bob Twillman, PhD, FAPM, executive director of the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM), acknowledged that the group had concerns about the governor’s original proposal, but called the revised legislation “much improved.” Still, he added that there are “a couple of things” the AAPM would like to see changed, among them a provision that “could lead to … involuntary commitment for treatment of a substance use disorder, based on somewhat vague criteria and with the note that, if there is inadequate room in hospitals, those individuals undergoing such treatment can be moved to a correctional facility.

“We think that goes a few steps too far. On the whole, however, we think the hard work of Massachusetts pain management advocates shows in the latest bill, and we’re grateful that legislators have listened to our concerns,” said Dr. Twillman. “[We are] a big supporter of efforts to prevent and treat opioid addiction, provided those efforts are appropriately designed so that they don’t produce a harmful outcome for people with pain.”

If Gov. Baker ultimately gives the state House bill his formal stamp of approval, it will mark only his latest legislative action aimed at curbing the effects of opioid abuse. Last year, his administration committed more than $7 million in grant funding toward educational initiatives and efforts to prepare first responders to treat victims of opioid overdose.

Scott Sigman, MD, chief of orthopedic surgery at Lowell General Hospital, in Lowell, who has met with Gov. Baker several times to offer his perspective on the problem, told Pain Medicine News, “I have expressed my personal opinion that physicians need to be better educated on prescriptive practices. We must also educate our patients to the dangers of prescriptive medications and the possibility of substance abuse. Our local community continues to be overwhelmed with narcotic overdoses. Our emergency rooms and emergency responders are not able to keep up with this epidemic.”

Meanwhile, with more than 80 opioid-related deaths in his city in 2014 alone, Boston Mayor Martin J. Walsh has made prevention and treatment a cornerstone of his public health platform as well. Last year, his office established an Office of Recovery Services, the first known municipality-based office in the United States dedicated to the prevention and treatment of substance abuse. In November 2015, his office held its first-ever Fighting Addiction In The Hub (FAITH) program (the name refers to a nickname for the city of Boston). According to city officials, the goal of FAITH is to educate the public on the extent of opioid abuse in the community and to provide the tools to combat the problem. In addition, the Walsh administration has taken steps to ensure that first responders in the city are equipped with the opioid overdose drug naloxone in order to provide emergency treatment to overdose victims. Due in large part to efforts such as these, Mayor Walsh was appointed chair of the U.S. Conference of Mayors Task Force on Substance Abuse, Prevention and Recovery Services in October.

“I know from personal experience that to get people the help they need, we have to meet them where they are: whether that’s on the street, in the hospital, at home, at work or in school,” Mayor Walsh said in a statement issued to Pain Medicine News and other media outlets. “We need to work together toward a comprehensive continuum of care; we need to tackle this crisis on all fronts.”

How these efforts will ultimately affect the treatment of chronic pain remains to be seen.

Another chronic painer found a way to resolve her suffering

This is the second one of these denial of care in two days that has caused a pt to permanently alleviate their pain via SUICIDE.  That I have heard about.. how many have happened that has not seen the light of day and/or being buried with a death certificate being labeled as a “opiate related death”  Why doesn’t more people see that every opiate related DEAth has a common denominator ?

This appeared on another chronic pain FB page :

At around 330 am my cell phone rang and when your phone rings at that time it’s not going to be good, a very good and close personal friend of mine had been found unresponsive in her bathroom by her hubby, one of my best friends and how I met her actually, he thought maybe she had a heart attack and called 911. They get there and get her to the hospital had to shock her 5 times before they called it. Not knowing the reason they had to run to screens and do an autopsy. She was a chronic pain patient who her new PCP told her she was to young to be experiencing that kind of pain and sent her to a Psychiatrist early this week who was very nice and respectful to her and gave her phych meds and a sleeping pill. Her new Dr being a yutz that she is cut her off of her pain meds accept topomax and a muscle relaxer, this down from oxycodone and other meds. She committed suicide early this morning. Her daughter found the note along with all her personal papers including a living will that was DNR, hospital ER staff is not to blame nor the EMT’S because it has not been notorized as of yet. But this Doctor, boy this Doctor she is going to be meeting my lawyer friend I went to High School and some College with and if he can win a case before the supreme court he can kick this Doctors ass. I will also be calling the Bishop Cupich and a very old friend Cardinal Timothy Dolan who started out as a Priest and the Bishop in Milwaukee to get her a dispensation to be buried in consecrated ground and to be able to have her mass and funeral at her Church. So after typing all of this it was to say we have lost another one unable to bear the pain anymore. No she wasn’t in this group she is from Chicago area.

Race and history of immigration are an essential part of the war on drugs ?

Mission not accomplished

http://www.dailyevergreen.com/news/article_dbc7170c-ca19-11e5-b270-8bee17508834.html

The war on drugs has been a misguided failure. Or so a professor claimed yesterday, as part of the Foley Institute’s Coffee & Politics series.

Suzanna Reiss, associate professor in the Department of History at University of Hawai’i Manoa and author of “We Sell Drugs: The Alchemy of U.S. Empire,” spoke about how current and past discussion and policing of drugs in the U.S. has been intertwined with racist and anti-immigrant attitudes.

“Race and history of immigration are an essential part of this story,” Reiss said.

Reiss used examples from the late 1800s, early 1900s and recent times to illustrate the racist and anti-immigrant sentiment behind the rhetoric used to describe those who sell and use drugs.

She said opium was demonized and made illegal because it was used by Chinese immigrants, while the main users of opium at the time were white women who got the drug from their doctor.

She compared this example with the rhetoric used by current Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, who says the Mexicans that come to the U.S. are rapists and are bringing drugs.

“He’s blaming outsiders, which is typical in the history of drug control,” Reiss said referring to Trump.

Reiss said that many of the laws passed against drugs such as the 1914 Harrison Act were not necessarily prohibition, but more of a way to control certain groups.

“The new drug law effectively meant that primarily middle white class people with access to physician’s prescriptions, medical board licenses, government contracts or pharmaceutical company protection, can relatively end police access to drugs while other’s efforts to acquire drugs for recreational or medicinal purposes became very potentially legally hazardous,” Reiss said.

She said laws like these and the racist attitudes behind their creation and continuity are the roots of modern movements like Black Lives Matter.

Reiss said in her opinion it would be best to legalize all drugs in the U.S.

She reasoned that it would make it safer for anybody who actually wanted to try the drug and the current system has simply not benefited public safety.

Reporting by Dennis Farrell

UP TO 400,000 preventable medical errors deaths… no epidemic here ?

Medical Errors in Hospitals are Third Leading Cause of Death in U.S.

The Journal of Patient Safety discussed recent studies which have shown that preventable medical errors are responsible for between 200,000 and 400,000 patient deaths per year in U.S. hospitals. These errors include facility acquired infections, medication errors, omissions in treatment, communication errors between health care providers, nerve or vessel injuries, wrong operations, injuries to organs during surgical procedures, blood clots, diagnostic errors, and wound infections. The number of deaths caused by medical errors committed in a hospital, but which occur after a patient is discharged from a hospital, is equally large.

The cost of deaths due to preventable medical errors is obviously staggering in terms of the emotional loss felt by the family members and loved ones of those who have needlessly died, but the financial loss is shocking as well. By some estimates, medical errors cost the United States between $15 and 19 billion per year in additional medical costs including ancillary services, prescription drug services, and in-patient and out-patient care.

Interestingly, one study found that patients reported 3 times as many preventable adverse events than were indicated in their records. This study also found that physicians often refuse to report serious adverse events, with cardiologists being the highest of the non-reporting physician groups.

Paying criminals not to commit crimes.. where do we sign up ?

congressstupid

DC government will pay criminals not to commit crimes

In ancient times, it was known as “Tribute” – a city or town paying barbarians not to attack and destroy their homes.  Sometimes it worked, and the barbarians went away.  But more often than not, the barbarians happily took the tribute and then attacked and looted the city anyway.

The city government of Washington, D.C. is looking to revive the practice by paying criminals up to perhaps $9,000 a year not to commit any crimes.

Associated Press:

Under the bill, city officials would identify up to 200 people a year who are considered at risk of either committing or becoming victims of violent crime. Those people would be directed to participate in behavioral therapy and other programs. If they fulfill those obligations and stay out of trouble, they would be paid.

The bill doesn’t specify the value of the stipends, but participants in the California program receive up to $9,000 per year.

Councilmember Kenyan McDuffie, a Democrat who wrote the legislation, said it was part of a comprehensive approach to reducing violent crime in the city, which experienced a 54 percent increase in homicides last year. Homicides and violent crime are still down significantly since the 2000s, and even more so since the early 1990s when the District was dubbed the nation’s “murder capital.”

McDuffie argued that spending $9,000 a year in stipends “pales in comparison” to the cost of someone being victimized, along with the costs of incarcerating the offender.

“I want to prevent violent crime – particularly gun violence – by addressing the root causes and creating opportunities for people, particularly those individuals who are at the highest risks of offending,” McDuffie, a former prosecutor, said in a letter to constituents last week.

Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser has not committed to funding the program, which would cost $4.9 million over four years, including $460,000 a year in stipend payments, according to the District’s independent chief financial officer. Without the mayor’s support, it would be up to the Council to find money for it through new taxes or cuts to existing programs.

The program would be run independently of the police department, and participants would remain anonymous. Its goal would be to recruit people who are at risk of violence but don’t have criminal cases pending.

How will modern-day barbarians respond?  Probably the same way the Visigoths or the Mongols responded: if your city was a sitting duck and they could attack without severe losses, you were toast.

If someone is predisposed to committing violent crime, he will refrain from doing so as long as he believes he will be caught and punished.  But if he thinks he can get away with it, I suspect no matter what behaviroal classes he has attended, he will go ahead and offend.

Perhaps D.C. should take that money and hire more police rather than pay a tribute to barbarians, at whose mercy D.C. residents will be.

Insurer: pt NOT SICK ENOUGH for Hep-C med.. Genocide American Style

Lawsuits claim insurers unfairly refuse pricey hepatitis C drugs

http://www.pharmacychoice.com/News/article.cfm?Article_ID=1507549

Feb. 03David Morton figures he contracted hepatitis C back in the late 1980s, when the Ph.D. chemist was doing a dirty job: analyzing raw-sewage samples for toxins in Texas.

“We were looking for priority pollutants on the Environmental Protection Agency watch list,” the 61-year-old Redmond man said. “I thought I was benefiting society. I sort of clenched my teeth and did it.”

Back then, no one knew what hep C was, let alone that it could be transmitted by dirty needles or other exposure. It took nearly a decade before Morton was diagnosed.

Today, however, doctors not only know what causes the liver-damaging virus that affects 3.5 million Americans, they know how to cure it.

But when Morton got a prescription last fall for Harvoni, one of the new, highly effective drugs to halt the hep C virus (HCV), he couldn’t fill it. Group Health Cooperative, his insurance provider, wouldn’t pay for it.

Treatment with Harvoni, which costs about $95,000 for a 12-week course, was limited to people with more severe infection, the denial letters explained.

“They said I wasn’t sick enough,” Morton said.

So Morton has sued, agreeing to be the face of a class-action lawsuit. His is one of two class-action cases recently filed in King County Superior Court, and among a handful nationwide aimed at forcing insurers to provide drugs to patients, regardless of high prices set by pharmaceutical firms.

“I believe that all those infected with hep C should qualify for treatment,” Morton said.

The complaints allege that two Washington state insurers Group Health and BridgeSpan insurance, a subsidiary of Regence BlueShield are unfairly limiting use of hep C drugs based on cost, not medical necessity. Some insurers in the state cover patients at all stages of the disease.

Group Health Cooperative “has put in place internal coverage restrictions that impermissibly deny all its insureds access to curative treatment for HCV solely because it is perceived to be expensive by GHC,” the complaint states. “Specifically, GHC rations treatment, excluding all coverage except to the most severely ill insureds.”

“It’s not Mr. Morton’s responsibility to think about how to pay for this,” said Ele Hamburger, one of the lawyers at Sirianni Youtz Spoonemore Hamburger, the Seattle firm handling both lawsuits. “What they’re trying to do is put patients in the middle.”

At issue are what Michael Ninburg, executive director of Seattle’s Hepatitis Education Project, calls “wonder drugs” and a “medical revolution.”

In the past few years, drugmakers have begun marketing new direct-acting antivirals, or DAAs, medications that can cure hep C with more than 90 percent success, eliminating the virus from the body.

Such drugs can halt and perhaps reverse the ravages of chronic hep C, which can destroy the liver and lead to liver cancer.

But drugs such as Gilead’s Sovaldi and Harvoni came with those high price tags more than $1,000 a pill, prompting Medicaid programs in dozens of states, including Washington, to restrict use to people with the most severe fibrosis, or liver scarring. Private insurers followed suit.

The state Health Care Authority said it is considering broadening access through Medicaid.

Last fall the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) updated its guidelines, saying drugs such as Harvoni “would benefit nearly all of those chronically infected with HCV.”

That changed the game, said Hamburger. If the new hep C drugs are now the standard for medical care, they should be provided to all patients and not rationed to a few.

Officials with Group Health and BridgeSpan declined to comment on the lawsuits, citing pending litigation. But BridgeSpan officials said policies surrounding Harvoni are “still evolving and changing.”

Group Health officials, responding to a survey about hep C policies from Washington Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler, also said they are “continuously re-evaluating treatment guidelines in light of the new guidelines, medications and new literature.”

For his part, Kreidler said he is encouraging insurers to follow the medical standard of care, though he said he can’t mandate which drugs should be covered or which patients should receive them.

“They really need to, from my perspective, follow the medical guidelines, and if they don’t, we have a process to challenge them on that,” he said.

Dr. Scott Ramsey, a health economist at Seattle’s Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, said the volatile hep C drug market underscores larger issues that won’t be solved with lawsuits.

“The larger issue is whether we will accept the pharmaceutical industry’s argument that these high prices are justified or whether we feel like the pricing model for these drugs needs some change,” he said.

In the meantime, however, David Morton said he’s happy to be the face of change. And he’d like to get his prescription filled, too.

“I’d like to eradicate the virus,” he said.

JoNel Aleccia: 206-464-2906 or jaleccia@seattletimes.com. On Twitter @JoNel-Aleccia

Prescription Benefit Managers (PBM) …CDC’s guidelines don’t go far enough ?

Draft Opioid Prescribing Guidelines Don’t Pass Managed Care Muster

https://aishealth.com/archive/ndbn012216-03?utm_source=Real%20Magnet&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=89303360

While the workers’ compensation industry is working to tackle opioid misuse and abuse by effecting change at the state level (see story, p. 1), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has posted a long-awaited set of prescribing guidelines that address, among other things, the use of opioids for chronic pain outside end-of-life care and opioid selection and dosage. But one stakeholder group suggests the guidelines in their current form do not adequately represent the perspective of managed care pharmacy.

After informally releasing the guidelines in September 2015 and gathering input from a variety of stakeholders, the CDC on Dec. 14 posted its Proposed 2016 Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain. Responding to the guidelines by the close of the comment period, the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) on Jan. 13 called them a “step in the right direction” but said it believes several elements are missing from the guidelines or can be improved upon.

For example, AMCP said it’s unclear whether pharmacy was represented in the Core Expert Group and asked that the CDC publicly release the names of the participants. According to the CDC website, the Core Expert Group is separate from a larger group of interested stakeholders, and included representatives from professional societies such as the Society of General Internal Medicine, American Academy of Family Physicians and American College of Physicians. AMCP also pointed out that while the guidelines recommend that prescribers evaluate risk factors for opioid-related harms before initiating therapy, they do not include a recommendation to refer patients identified as having significant risk factors (e.g., history of substance use disorder) to a pain specialist or addiction therapist prior to beginning therapy.

Drug Benefit News

Notably lacking from the proposed guidelines was a recommendation for lock-in programs, which are currently used in state Medicaid programs and commercial plans to restrict patients at the highest risk of opioid overuse to a single pharmacy and/or prescriber. AMCP urged the CDC to amend the draft guidelines to include such a recommendation in order to limit doctor and pharmacy shopping. Although lock-in programs are currently prohibited under Medicare Part D, the HHS Office of Inspector General has recommended their use in the program (DBN 8/22/14, p. 3).

According to data posted Dec. 18 in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, opioid overdose deaths in 2014 reached record levels, climbing 14% in just one year to 28,647 deaths, or nearly 61% of all drug overdose deaths. Meanwhile, the rate of opioid overdose deaths involving natural and semisynthetic opioids, which include commonly prescribed painkillers such as oxycodone and hydrocodone, increased 9% in 2014, whereas that rate had dropped in 2012 and remained stable in 2013, said the CDC.

View the guidelines, Docket No. CDC-2015-0112, and all comments at www.regulations.gov.

Obama – 1.1 billion more to treat addicts… chronic painers… not so much concern

President Barack Obama proposes $1.1B in new funding to combat heroin, opioid epidemic

President Barack Obama proposes $1.1B in new funding to combat heroin, opioid epidemic

President Barack Obama announced Tuesday he wants $1.1 billion in new funding to increase treatment access to opioid and heroin addicts nationwide.

The president’s 2017 budget proposal will include $1 billion in mandatory funding over two years to increase addiction treatment for heroin and prescription opioids and to make the services more affordable.Obama said additional funding is needed as overdose deaths have overtaken vehicle accident deaths in the last couple of years, with 28,648 prescription pain medication- and heroin-related deaths in the United States in 2014.

While Florida isn’t considered a state with a serious heroin-addiction rate, the Manatee and Sarasota county areas reported heroin overdose deaths doubled to more than 150 in 2015, compared with 63 in 2014 and just 19 in 2013.

Scott & Bondi should be so proud with their successfully winning the war on “pill mills” in FL.  Heroin overdose deaths increase SEVEN TIMES in just TWO YEARS

Officials say Manatee County’s heroin epidemic began in spring 2014, when police began seeing greater use of fentanyl, an opioid pain reliever 80 to 100 times stronger than morphine. Research has found three of four new heroin users reported abusing prescription opioid pain relievers before turning to heroin.

Most of the proposed new money – $920 million – would fund cooperative agreements with states to provide more drug-based treatment for people addicted to painkilling opioids such as OxyContin, Percocet, hydrocodone and morphine.

The money would be allocated based on the severity of a state’s problem and its strategy to address the issue.

Republican Rep. Vern Buchanan of Bradenton, Florida, said he supports Obama’s proposal.

“This is a problem destroying lives and families across America that needs to be addressed,” Buchanan said in an email statement. “I strongly support efforts to fight the heroin and drug abuse epidemic in this country and look forward to reviewing the president’s proposal.”

Obama’s proposal would also use $50 million in National Health Service Corps funding to expand services at roughly 700 drug treatment facilities, including those in areas with a shortage of behavioral health providers.An estimated $30 million would be used to measure the effectiveness of treatment programs employing medication-assisted treatment under real-world conditions and help identify improved treatment for patients with opioid-use disorders.

Another $90 million would go toward expanding state-level prescription drug overdose prevention strategies, increase the availability of medication-assisted treatment programs, improve access to the overdose-reversal drug naloxone and support enforcement activities. The increase would bring the total amount of federal funding to those programs to $500 million.

A portion of this funding is directed specifically to rural areas where rates of overdose and opioid use are particularly high.

“This investment, combined with other efforts underway to reduce barriers to treatment for substance use disorders, will help ensure that every American who wants treatment can access it and get the help they need,” the White House Press Office said in the release.

The money also would fund an HHS project that allows nurse practitioners and physician assistants to prescribe buprenorphine, an opioid addiction treatment approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

From 2010 to 2012, the death rate from heroin doubled across 28 states representing 56 percent of the U.S. population, according to a 2014 government report.

The increase in heroin overdoses — from 1 per 100,000 deaths to 2.1 per 100,000 deaths during that time — was driven by increasing supplies of the drug and the widespread use of and addiction to prescription opioid pain relievers.

Obama’s plan will be part of his 2017 budget proposal, scheduled to be released next Tuesday.

Kate Irby, Herald online/political reporter, can be reached at 941-745-7055. You can follow her on Twitter@KateIrby.