I just never know what will show up in my inbox

stevemailboxMay need to click TWICE on image to make readable

cvsarbitration1cvsarbitration3cvsarbitration4cvsarbitration2

.

 

 

CDC… now pissing off another group… what group is next ?

unclesamThe CDC Suggests Women Stop Drinking or Having Sex, Because Shaming Women Is Cool

https://www.yahoo.com/news/cdc-suggests-women-stop-drinking-232800220.html

The nation’s leading public health institute has a message for millions of American women: If you want to have sex, stop boozing, because you might get pregnant. 

On Tuesday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a statement aimed at reducing the incidence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASDs), which “can cause lasting physical, behavioral, and intellectual disabilities” and can result from alcohol consumption during pregnancy. With that goal in mind, the CDC noted: 

An estimated 3.3 million women between the ages of 15 and 44 years are at risk of exposing their developing baby to alcohol because they are drinking, sexually active, and not using birth control to prevent pregnancy, according to the latest CDC  Vital Signs report released today. The report also found that 3 in 4 women who want to get pregnant as soon as possible do not stop drinking alcohol when they stop using birth control. 

The press release goes on to make the thinly veiled suggestion that any woman who might expose even a hypothetical fetus to FASDs should abstain from drinking entirely. 

“Alcohol can permanently harm a developing baby before a woman knows she is pregnant,” Dr. Anne Schuchat, CDC Principal Deputy Director, said. “About half of all pregnancies in the United States are unplanned, and even if planned, most women won’t know they are pregnant for the first month or so, when they might still be drinking. The risk is real. Why take the chance?”

So, basically, if you are a woman who has ever had unprotected sex and you have a uterus that could potentially be inhabited, you have two options: Either shut your legs or stick to club soda. 

The CDC Suggests Women Stop Drinking or Having Sex, Because Shaming Women Is Cool

View photos
Source: 
 
 

Of course, as the 31% of women who rely on the pullout method (or the likely much larger group of people having totally unprotected sex who just don’t want to admit it) could tell you, the CDC’s suggestion is fairly unrealistic, in that it ignores the reality of how women are actually having sex. In addition to policing women’s bodies and shaming them for their choices, the recommendation utterly ignores the reasons why women might not be using contraception. 

Often, those reasons are entirely out of women’s control. Contraceptive access remains severely limited for millions of American women for myriad reasons, from a lack of insurance coverage to the cost of doctors’ appointments to persistent pharmacy refusals to provide birth control. Some women can’t get to the pharmacy before it closes to get their contraception; others are shamed when they go to pick it up. 

There are plenty of ways contraception could be more accessible nationwide, like allowing pharmacists to prescribe hormonal birth control, or making it available over-the-counter without a prescription but with full insurance coverage, or not continually attacking organizations that provide it for free, like Planned Parenthood. Unfortunately, we don’t live in a world where those things are likely to happen. 

Instead, we live in a world where a majority of U.S. states don’t require comprehensive sexual health education in public schools and young people are taught virtually nothing about safe sex. A world where the CDC wouldn’t think to issue a corresponding press release reminding men who haven’t had vasectomies to use a condom if they want to prevent FASDs, because women are expected to take sole responsibility for avoiding pregnancy (as well as the complications that can come with it). A world where women’s behavior, particularly their alcohol consumption, is routinely implicated as the cause of other problems — we already tell women not to hit the bottle so hard if they don’t want to be sexually assaulted. 

Bureaucrats unhappy because certain people covered under ADA can’t afford/get their medications

Drug Company CEO Martin Shkreli Who Raised AIDS Medication Price 5,000% Arrested

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/12/17/drug-company-ceo-who-raised-aids-medication-price-5000-martin-shkreli-arrested/

AP Photo

 

Our government couldn’t find anything wrong with Shkreli increasing the price of a particular medication… they had to find something to drag him thru the “legal mud” … bureaucrats are decrying the price increase because a certain segment of our population may not be able to get/afford their necessary life saving medication. To bad these same bureaucrats have considerable less concern about certain other segments of our population that can’t get their necessary life saving medications for whatever reason(s)… most of it having nothing to do with the cost of the medication.

The infamous pharmaceutical CEO Martin Shkreli has been arrested. It wasn’t, however, related to his 5,000% hike of a life-saving AIDS drug. Instead, the SEC seems to have caught Shkreli playing with numbers just a bit too liberally.

Shkreli has been charged with securities fraud by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. According to the SEC, the ousted Chief Executive Officer of Retrophin illegally took stock from the company in order to pay off unrelated debt incurred in separate business dealings. Now Federal prosecutors are also accusing him of making secret payoffs and setting up fraudulent consulting arrangements in order to shore up the losses of now-defunct hedge fund MSMB Capital Management. Evan Greebel, a New York lawyer associated with Shkreli, has also been arrested for some measure of conspiracy in the matter.

The charges are numerous. Authorities have described the investment and subsequent loss of over $5 million, covered by allegedly false reports of returns. At one point, Shkreli claimed returns of more than 35% while actually operating under a loss of 18%. He then allegedly used the money he was given on himself, paying for lavish personal expenses with client money and lying to his broker about his actions.

Retrophin has also filed a suit against Shkreli for allegedly spending vast amounts of their money to pay off angry claimants regarding his hedge fund mismanagement, but Shkreli claims that the suit “would not dent” him. He’s “licking his chops” over counter suits he plans to file against them and says that all of his supposedly backdoor deals were made with the approval of unidentified “outside counsel.” He previously responded to those allegations via InvestorHub.

Retrophin has been only too happy to comply with the government in the case against their former CEO. Evan Greebel’s current firm, Kaye Scholer, has been just as eager to distance themselves from the lawyer’s suspect activities. Even 2016 presidential candidates have gotten in on the Shkreli hate: Donald Trump called Martin Shkreli a “spoiled brat,”

You’d think that the level of animosity directed at him from both sides of the aisle might prompt some level of introspection, but you’d be wrong. Given the chance to do things over again, Shkreli has said that he’d have raised the price of Daraprim even higher. And if his open spite wasn’t endearing enough, he made even more friends by throwing money at the Wu Tang Clan for the single copy of their latest album.

For the moment, Martin Shkreli has been released on a $5 million dollar bond, with his travel restricted to parts of New York. If convicted of the crimes accused, the federal government will likely render this pharmaceutical “bad boy” a bit less flush. And maybe, if we’re lucky, they’ll take back that Wu Tang Clan album as well. That is, if Bill Murray doesn’t get to it first.

ACLU attorney who has worked on the photo litigation for 10yrs on alleged abuse of TERRORIST

Nearly 200 images released by US military depict Bush-era detainee abuse

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/05/us-military-bush-era-detainee-abuse-photos-released-pentagon-iraq-afghanistan-guantanamo-bay

How many chronic pain pts have contacted the ACLU about being denied care/abused by our medical and judicial system ? Is the alleged abuse of foreign terrorists that have murdered our citizens and killed our soldiers more worthy of expending resources  over seeking justice for confirmed abuse of chronic pain pts by our medical and judicial system ?

Court ruling forces Pentagon to release photos after 12-year legal battle over abuse at military sites around Iraq and Afghanistan

  • Warning: Some readers may find these images distressing
 
The ACLU pledged to keep fighting for approximately 1,800 more images that remain withheld, which it believes shows far more graphic abuse.
The ACLU pledged to keep fighting for approximately 1,800 more images that remain withheld, which it believes shows far more graphic abuse. Photograph: Department of Defense

Bruises, reddened marks and bandaged body parts featured in nearly 200 images of US detainee abuse that the Pentagon was forced to release on Friday, the result of a court battle that has lasted more than a decade.

While the American Civil Liberties Union – which has fought for the publication of the photos of Bush-era torture in Iraq and Afghanistan since October 2003 – hailed the belated disclosure, it pledged to keep fighting for approximately 1,800 more images the Pentagon continues to withhold, which it believes documents far more graphic detainee torture.

The photos are part of a cache relevant to investigations of detainee abuse at two dozen US military sites around Iraq and Afghanistan, and perhaps Guantánamo Bay. Many showed detainees in states of undress having their bodies inspected, with rulers and coins held up for comparison and placement of injuries.

In November, Ashton Carter, the US defense secretary, cleared the way to release 198 of the images after a federal judge rejected longstanding government attempts to suppress the entire cache.

In allowing the release of the photos, Carter has reversed the decisions of two of his Pentagon predecessors and a bevy of senior military officers over the years. Nevertheless, the ACLU called the release insufficient, selective and indicative of a cover-up of detainee abuse stretching across the Bush and Obama administrations.

“It’s most likely the case that these are the most innocuous of the photos, and if that’s true, it’s a shadow of meaningful transparency,” said Alex Abdo, an ACLU attorney who has worked on the photo litigation since 2005.

The photos appeared decontextualized, without indication of what specific abuses investigators inspected, where detainees were held, or under what circumstances.

Several photos were grainy, showing sections of the body where detainees alleged US troops harmed them, without showing a person in full. Several images displayed detainees’ legs, backs, feet and occasionally their heads, though the head photographs did not show visible contusions.

Image depicts detainee’s arm injury. No further context was provided.
Image depicts detainee’s arm injury. No further context was provided. Photograph: Department of Defense

None of the photographs showed a detained man’s unobscured face.

A Pentagon statement accompanying the photos said that the investigations they supported had resulted in 14 substantiated allegations, from which “65 service members received some form of disciplinary action”, ranging from letters of reprimand to life imprisonment.

While a full accounting of what the photos show remains elusive, the ACLU believes that among the still-suppressed photos are imagery of a female soldier sexually abusing a detainee with a broomstick; an Iraqi civilian farmer executed by US troops while his hands were tied behind his back; and autopsy photos of an Afghan detainee known as Dilawar, whose death was the subject of Alex Gibney’s acclaimed 2007 documentary Taxi to the Dark Side.

Since the ACLU first sought the photos in the wake of the international outcry over US torture at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison, a wall of US government resistance had long held firm. Famously, in May 2009, Obama reversed his position on the photograph’s release in May 2009, and ordered the photos to remain hidden, contending they would “further inflame anti-American opinion” if released.

Later that year, Congress passed the Protected National Security Documents Act, to suppress any Bush-era photographs of detainees in military custody unless the defense secretary could vouch that their release would have minimal consequences for US troops.

Image depicts detainee’s foot injury. No further context was provided.
Image depicts detainee’s foot injury. No further context was provided. Photograph: Department of Defense

But the ACLU won a breakthrough in 2014 after a decade of litigation. A federal judge in New York, Alvin Hellerstein, rejected the government’s desired blanket ban on the photos in 2014 and required the Pentagon to individually certify images it considered harmful to national security and explain its reasoning.

After viewing some of the photographs privately, Hellerstein said in August 2014 that some of them were “relatively innocuous while others need more serious consideration”.

Hellerstein’s assessment contradicted two defense secretaries, Robert Gates and Leon Panetta, as well as US marine generals James Mattis and John Allen, all of whom certified that the wholesale release of the detainee photo trove would “endanger citizens of the United States, members of the United States armed forces, or employees of the United States Government deployed outside the United States”.

A Pentagon statement said that senior military commanders were consulted before the release, and pledged the military to ensuring “the safe, lawful, and humane treatment of individuals in U.S. custody in the context of armed conflicts, consistent with the treaty obligations of the United States, including the Geneva Conventions”.

Image depicts what appears to be a detainee’s leg injury. No further context was provided.
Image depicts what appears to be a detainee’s leg injury. No further context was provided. Photograph: Department of Defense

Still, the ACLU vowed to continue its fight for the release of all the photographs. The next hearing in the group’s ongoing transparency lawsuit is due for 19 February, before Hellerstein.

The ACLU’s Abdo cited the case of Eric Garner, whose choking death by New York police was filmed and distributed on social media, as a testament to the unique power of imagery to galvanize change and drive calls for justice.

“We think the photos, when released, have the ability to do the same for accountability for the abuse of detainees, and I think the Pentagon knows it, too,” Abdo said.

Changing the vernacular… a good thing ?

nosuicide

How Michelle Watt Death Same As Robin Williams

http://www.latesthealthnews.co/how-michelle-watt-death-same-as-robin-williams/

“Robin Williams didn’t die from suicide.

When people die from cancer, their cause of death can be various horrible things – seizure, stroke, pneumonia – and when someone dies after battling cancer, and people ask “How did they die?”, you never hear anyone say “pulmonary embolism”, the answer is always “cancer”. A Pulmonary Embolism can be the final cause of death with some cancers, but when a friend of mine died from cancer, he died from cancer. That was it. And when I asked my wife what Robin Williams died from, she, very wisely, replied “Depression”.

The word “suicide” gives many people the impression that “it was his own decision,” or “he chose to die, whereas most people with cancer fight to live.” And, because Depression is still such a misunderstood condition, you can hardly blame people for not really understanding. Just a quick search on Twitter will show how many people have little sympathy for those who commit suicide.

Read More: Michelle Watt Death..

But, just as a Pulmonary Embolism is a fatal symptom of cancer, suicide is a fatal symptom of Depression. Depression is an illness, not a choice of lifestyle. You can’t just “cheer up” with depression, just as you can’t choose not to have cancer. When someone commits suicide as a result of Depression, they die from Depression – an illness that kills millions each year. It is hard to know exactly how many people actually die from Depression each year because the figures and statistics only seem to show how many people die from “suicide” each year (and you don’t necessarily have to suffer Depression to commit suicide, it’s usually just implied). But considering that one person commits suicide every 14 minutes in the US alone, we clearly need to do more to battle this illness, and the stigmas that continue to surround it. Perhaps Depression might lose some its “it was his own fault” stigma, if we start focussing on the illness, rather than the symptom. Robin Williams didn’t die from suicide. He died from Depression*. It wasn’t his choice to suffer that.”

We need to talk more about depression. Please, share this with your friends. Help the world understand that depression is NOT a choice.

New Hampshire’s the issue most concerning voters isn’t jobs, national security or immigration. It’s drug abuse.

What do the candidates propose to do about prescription drug abuse?

http://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/What-do-the-candidates-propose-to-do-about-6810128.php

With New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation primary coming up on Tuesday, you may be surprised to learn that the issue most concerning the Granite State’s voters isn’t jobs, national security or immigration. It’s drug abuse.

 A prescription drug epidemic — mainly driven by the wide availability and abuse of opioid prescription drugs such as OxyContin — is ravaging New Hampshire. There were roughly 400 deaths from overdose in 2015 — double those from 2014. Here in California, Orange, San Diego and Los Angeles counties have the most opioid-related deaths. Roughly 125 Americans now die from drug overdose every day.

What would the presidential candidates do to solve this crisis? Unfortunately, most of them have given little indication. I have some suggestions:

Require states to share information — Every state except Missouri has a drug monitoring program that tracks controlled substances sold within their borders. But the moment someone crosses a state line to get a prescription filled, they can drop off the radar. This makes it incredibly difficult for law enforcement and medical professionals to know what’s happening in their own neighborhoods. I’ve seen this firsthand in California — we desperately want to share information with our peers in Oregon, Nevada and Arizona, yet are unable to do so.

Propose creation of a national database to keep track of opioid use — The National Association of Boards of Pharmacy has funded and helped develop a secure system that conforms to the data standards put in place by the federal government for such interstate data sharing. It is in use in 34 states, although California is not one. By the end of 2016, some 40 states will either be connected to or working toward a connection to this system. The next president should propose that the remaining states participate, even as soon as 2020.

Increase funding for medical training programs — Pharmacists and other medical professionals are often given insufficient training when it comes to the dangers of prescription opioid abuse. As a result, many medical professionals unintentionally over-prescribe opioids when another, less dangerous, substance will do. Prescriptions — and addiction rates — would start to drop.

To be clear: Any sort of nationally mandated training and prescribing guidelines would fail to account for all of a state’s or city’s specific needs. The federal government could step up funding for programs such “SafeMedLA, which is run in my county of Los Angeles. An equally important part of this puzzle is the creation of training programs for those who have been in practice for many years — not just current medical and pharmacy school students.

We must spur a larger conversation on how to fight the prescription opioid abuse epidemic so that the presidential candidates take it seriously. So far, they have remained largely silent, even though this issue profoundly matters to millions of Americans.

Holly Strom, a licensed pharmacist, is a former president of the California Board of Pharmacy and the founder of Strom and Associates LLC, a health-care consulting practice.

 

Indiana going to take FIRST PLACE again.. in meth lab busts for 2016 ?

Law enforcement take down methamphetamine ring in Scott County, net 10 arrests

http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/law-enforcement-take-down-methamphetamine-ring-in-scott-county

SCOTT COUNTY, Ind. — A law enforcement coalition took down a methamphetamine and oxymorphone ring Friday morning in Scott County, where a recent HIV outbreak contributed to epidemic levels in southern Indiana.

The takedown was six months in the making, and involved five federal search warrants leading to the arrest of 10 people on charges of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances in Scott County.

RELATED | Indiana approves 1st needle-exchange program under new law

The DEA, Indiana State Police and law enforcement in Scott County all collaborated on the bust.

Those arrested were: 

Bennito L Rodriguez, a/k/a Benny, 38, Scottsburg, IN.
Brooklynn G. Mack, 29, Scottsburg, IN.
Rashawn A. Vaughn, a/k/a Ray, 41, Louisville, KY.
Eric L. Gude, 36, Indianapolis
Rashaan S. Perkins, a/k/a Phil, a/k/a D, 21, Detroit, MI.
Anthony L. Hardy, 39, Indianapolis
James D. Haney, 56, Austin, IN.
Justin M. Roberts, a/k/a Booger, 38, Austin, IN.
Travis D. Brock, 34, Scottsburg, IN.
Michael A. Doyle, 38, Scottsburg, IN.

According to Drug and Violent Crime Chief Bradley Blackington, the defendants face 10 years to Life imprisonment if convicted.

MAP | Where have meth labs been found near you?

“Scott County was targeted by an organization with the goal of infesting that community with drugs, including the prescription painkiller Opana,” said United States Attorney Josh Minkler in a release about the bust.  “This became an epidemic and local law enforcement asked for our help. Today, I am pleased to announce that the organization has been dismantled but this is only a start; one aspect of a bigger solution.”

Investigators began looking into the ring in June 2015, and allege that Bennito L. Rodriguez and his wife Brooklynn G. Mack were orchestrating the supply of Opana (oxymorphone) and methamphetamine in Scott County. Law enforcement officials believe those two got their supply from sources in Louisville, Detroit and Indianapolis. Similar operations in Detroit and Louisville followed Scott County’s arrests.

Scott County experienced an outbreak of HIV cases in 2015, due in part to intravenous drug abuse with substances such as heroin and Opana. Normally the county would report less than 10 cases of HIV annually, but in the last 13 months reported 188 cases. The county implemented a needle exchange in April as one means of slowing the spread, the first of its kind in the State of Indiana.

Opana has a street value of up to $160 and can be dissolve and injected by up to four individuals to get high, according to law enforcement.

“A public health crisis will not be solved by simply arresting those who illegally sell drugs,” Minkler added. “It also requires a reduction in demand for illegal drugs. That can only be accomplished by all of us-federal, state and local authorities along with public and private partnerships working together for prevention and treatment.”

“Scott County is one of the many great communities in our nation that is experiencing the pharmaceutical drug and methamphetamine epidemic that is turning Americans into drug addicts,” said DEA Associate Special Agent in Charge Karen I. Flowers.  “DEA will always stand with our local and state partners to fight this epidemic.   Today’s work is the beginning of a safer, stronger and healthier Scott County.”

“I am grateful for the participation of our state and federal partners in this operation,” Scott County Sheriff Dan McClain said. “This should be an indication to drug dealers throughout the county that our law enforcement agencies are working together to get drugs off our streets.”

“The DEA and the US Attorney have tools in their toolbox that are not available in state prosecutions, which make these types of outcomes difficult for us to pursue with local resources alone,” said Scott County Prosecutor, Jason Mount. “As one can see, these investigations can be long-term and intensive. We appreciate their joint efforts in this matter, and look forward to continuing to work together in both federal and state prosecutions.”

“For those that are addicted, we want to point them to the services they need to end their addiction,” said Indiana State Police Superintendent Doug Carter. “But for those who are trafficking and profiting from those suffering the misery of addiction, we will work tirelessly with our local and federal partners to put them in prison for a long, long time. 

Rumor on the street 02/05/2016 .. CVS Employee appreciation day ?

rumoronstreet

http://investorplace.com/2016/02/cvs-target-tgt/#.VrVEyub25j8

CVS (CVS) has opened its first pharmacies inside of Target (TGT) stores.

CVS 2 CVS Opens Its First Pharmacies Within Target StoresThe new CVS pharmacies within Target locations are located in the Charlotte, North Carolina market. The pharmacies are branded as CVS and replace the retailer’s own pharmacies that were in the area.

Here is where the new pharmacies inside of Target locations are located.

  • Hickory
  • Monroe
  • Morrisville
  • Raleigh
  • Matthews
  • Wesley Chapel

The new CVS pharmacies inside of Target locations are the start of a move to convert all Target pharmacies into ones owned by the pharmacy company. This will result in 1,672 pharmacies in the United States being converted over the next six to eight months.

It would seem that Larry Merlo and Helena Foulkes visited their new Rx dept acquisitions located within Target stores recently. Apparently, the existing CVS stores in those NC cities anticipating the “big shots” from Woonsocket, RI would also be on their “visit list”.  Rumor has it that all too many CVS employees put in my hours – on their own time – tidying up their stores to make them shine.

All those RPH’s that trained their new CVS colleagues in the “CVS way” … where seemingly expecting a “pat on the back” for all their hard work to acclimate the new CVS hires.

Rumor has it that the “big shots” from Woonsocket, RI couldn’t even find the time to visit CVS stores in the same shopping centers as their new Target/CVS Rx depts are located.  Maybe someone should remind them that unhappy employees created unhappy customers.

NEW PROGRAM AT CVS…. CVS EXPRESS

This program expands customer laziness to new heights…

Customer phones in OTC order, goes to iPad in store than manager shops for it. When customer arrives in lot, iPhone rings and manager has to bring out to car. Picture the manager with long lines having to go shop for maxi pads and brown sugar lipstick and milk because Ms. Jones doesn’t want to get out of the car!  There goes any chance of impulse sales from Ms Jones.

Imagine Ms. Jones calling in a order and then jumping into her car and driving 5-10 minutes to the store… and then is UPSET because her order is not ready.

If I remember correctly, Walgreens tried a pilot program of the same/similar nature and it has either been stopped or not expanded.

Their bottom line or your LIFE.. and they get to chose.. Genocide .. American Style ?

Insurers Wrestle With Costs, Utility of Genetic Tests

http://www.medpagetoday.com/Genetics/GeneticTesting/55987?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2016-02-04&eun=g578717d0r

Pennsylvania-based Independence Blue Cross’ announcement that it will cover a complex type of genetic testing for some cancer patients thrusts the insurer into an ongoing debate about how to handle an increasing array of these expensive tests.

Independence — with its approximately 3 million members — became the largest insurer to cover whole genome sequencing for select cancer patients. The analysis looks at the entire sequence of each tumor’s DNA and identifies mutated genes. Physicians can request this sequencing for children with tumors, patients with rare cancers, people with a type of breast cancer called triple negative, and patients who have exhausted conventional therapies for metastatic cancer.

While the hope is the results will help patients and their doctors pinpoint the best treatments based on genetic differences, there may not be any such drug regimens yet available. It’s also unclear whether the information the tests provide make any difference in a patient’s treatment and prognosis.

“Only some of the information is useful,” said Donna Messner, vice president and senior research director with the Center for Medical Technology Policy, a nonprofit organization working with insurers, genetic test companies, patient groups and clinicians to try to develop a common approach to insurance coverage. “That’s a challenge for payers.”

Cost is also a factor. Estimates of national spending on genetic and molecular testing vary, partly because there are so many different types of tests for different conditions. A 2012 analysis by UnitedHealth Group of national trends estimated the U.S. could see overall spending on genetic tests reach between $15 billion and $25 billion by 2021, up from $5 billion in 2010.

Despite the uncertainties, Independence CEO Daniel J. Hilferty said the insurer felt it was important to try to help some members learn more about their disease. He declined to say how much the program would cost but said the expected number of patients would be small, perhaps in the hundreds.

“Let’s jump in the pool,” said Hilferty of the decision to cover the complex test for a limited group of cancer types. “If evidence shows it works and is helpful, then we can do more.”

The testing “identifies genes for which there may be a target [treatment] available today — or maybe a target tomorrow when new drugs come to market,” said Don Liss, Independence’s medical director.

What Can Be Found In The Sequence?

Overall, genetic testing is available for more than 2,500 conditions and can be used to identify an inherited risk of a disease, the presence of a disease, or whether a particular drug treatment might be effective against the specific disease.

Some types of genetic tests are already commonly covered by insurers. Patients diagnosed with breast cancer, for example, get a test that determines whether their tumors express a type of protein against which a widely available anti-cancer drug is effective.

The testing that Independence will cover goes further — outlining a tumor’s entire genetic makeup and searching for anomalies in more than 20,000 genes. Medicare and most private insurers do not cover whole genome testing for cancer tumors.

UnitedHealth Group in December said it would cover whole genome profiling for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, but not the other cancers that Independence will cover.

Priority Health, a small insurer in Michigan last year began covering whole genome sequencing of tumors for certain late-stage, complex cancers in an effort to help target treatments. Patient advocacy groups, particularly those for people with lung cancer, are pushing hard for such testing, part of a campaign with the slogan, “Don’t guess. Test.”

“A lot of insurers decide on a case-by-case basis about these tests,” said Lynn Matrisian, vice president of scientific and medical affairs for the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network, a patient advocacy group. “Knowing that it’s covered, I think goes a long way in reassuring the patient that they will be able to get some of these therapies.”

The hope is that the analysis will help determine the subset of the type of cancer a patient has or detect characteristics of another type of cancer. Then oncologists could look for drugs that target the patient’s particular genetic profile. Sometimes that could involve prescribing a drug that is “off label,” a common practice in which a doctor prescribes a drug for a condition for which it was not initially approved by federal officials. A breast cancer drug, for example, might prove useful in another type of cancer.

While researchers believe the efforts are promising, evidence is scant. A study done in France found that “off label” use didn’t prove more effective than standard chemotherapy.

Still, as scientists increasingly study the genetic variations in cancer, researchers say more patients should have their tumors analyzed with whole genome sequencing — and the data gathered and shared. That could speed the development of new drugs, vaccines or combinations of treatments, part of the current focus on “precision medicines” and President Obama’s “moon shot on cancer.”

“The key to all this is if we’re going to advance this whole personalized medicine thing efficiently, we have to get all the insurance companies working in some kind of similar policy … and to incentivize standardized data that can be shared,” said Sean Tunis, founder of the Center for Medical Technology Policy.

The collaborative has recommended changes in coverage guidelines so that tests that assess five to 50 genes would no longer be considered “investigational” and would be covered by all U.S. health plans.

Hefty Out-of-Pocket Costs

Patients who want whole genome sequencing analysis even if it’s not covered by their insurer can sometimes get it done at an academic medical center as part of a research trial, or pay for it themselves. Prices can run anywhere from $1,000 to $5,000 or more, advocacy groups say.

When Tetyana Murza’s husband was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer 3 years ago, their insurer would not cover a whole genome analysis of the tumor. So they spent $2,000 to pay for it.

“When you pretty much have a terminal disease … you’re looking for all the options,” said Murza, managing director at the Genetic Alliance, a Washington-based coalition of disease advocacy groups, academic institutions and private companies. “You always have a hope that something will come up. Doing sequencing was that for us … we’re hoping to find those targets we can attack with medicine.”

They learned that her husband, Michael Mariotte, has a gene mutation that is not standard for pancreatic cancer but is more commonly seen in breast and some other types of cancer. She said there is a drug approved for another type of cancer that might work on that mutation. They haven’t tried it yet.

Instead, they’ve gone through several rounds of chemotherapy commonly used for pancreatic cancer. Now, there’s another new drug on the market for pancreatic cancer, and one their insurer says they must try first before moving on to the other.

Even though it hasn’t changed the course of his treatment, Murza says her husband is glad they did the sequencing: “He says it’s still good for him as a cancer patient to know there is another target, that something else can come up.”

Study Shows That Alcohol, Not Marijuana Is The Major “Gateway Drug”

Study Shows That Alcohol, Not Marijuana Is The Major “Gateway Drug”

http://dailyhealthtime.co/study-shows-that-alcohol-not-marijuana-is-the-major-gateway-drug/

A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Florida has shown that alcohol is far more of a “gateway drug” than marijuana is.
Results from the Guttman scale indicated that alcohol represented the “gateway” drug, leading to the use of tobacco, marijuana, and other illicit substances. Moreover, students who used alcohol exhibited a significantly greater likelihood of using both licit and illicit drugs. The findings from this investigation support that alcohol should receive primary attention in school-based substance abuse prevention programming, as the use of other substances could be impacted by delaying or preventing alcohol use. Therefore, it seems prudent for school and public health officials to focus prevention efforts, policies, and monies, on addressing adolescent alcohol use.
According to the study’s co-author, Adam E. Barry, the later in life that a person consumes alcohol, the less likely they are to abuse drugs. Also, it seems that in most cases, use of alcohol and tobacco comes earlier in life than the use of marijuana.
“By delaying the onset of alcohol initiation, rates of both licit substance abuse like tobacco and illicit substance use like marijuana and other drugs will be positively affected, and they’ll hopefully go down,” Barry said in an interview with Raw Story.
Barry said that his studies were intended to correct some of the propaganda that has infected American culture since the “Reefer Madness” era.
“Some of these earlier iterations needed to be fleshed out, that’s why we wanted to study this. The latest form of the gateway theory is that it begins with [marijuana] and moves on finally to what laypeople often call ‘harder drugs.’ As you can see from the findings of our study, it confirmed this gateway hypothesis, but it follows progression from licit substances, specifically alcohol, and moves on to illicit substances,” Barry said.
“So, basically, if we know what someone says with regards to their alcohol use, then we should be able to predict what they respond to with other [drugs]. Another way to say it is, if we know someone has done [the least prevalent drug] heroin, then we can assume they have tried all the others. I think [these results] have to do with level of access children have to alcohol, and that alcohol is viewed as less harmful than some of these other substances,” Barry added.
Just like prescription pills and tobacco, alcohol is seen as more socially acceptable in American society because the government approves of it. However, these substances are largely more dangerous than many of the illegal drugs that people have a deep fear of.
Since certain drugs are taken less seriously, people are more likely to abuse them and not keep their addiction in check. That is not to say that these legal drugs should be banned as well, in fact, all drugs should be legalized so honest discussions can be had about the uses and dangers of each drug.
John Vibes is an author, researcher and investigative journalist who takes a special interest in the counter culture and the drug war. In addition to his writing and activist work he organizes a number of large events including the Free Your Mind Conference, which features top caliber speakers and whistle-blowers from all over the world.