More breaking news on preventable deaths

tobacconews

20 veterans a day committed suicide in 2014, new data show

20 veterans a day committed suicide in 2014, new data show

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2016/07/07/veterans-suicides-young-men-women/86755132/

An average of 20 veterans a day committed suicide in 2014, a trend that reflects record high rates among young men fresh out of the military and growing numbers of women taking their lives, the first actual count of suicides among former service members shows.

The Department of Veterans Affairs previously had only estimated suicides, saying in 2010 there was an average of 22 a day. The 2

014 data released Thursday is based on a precise tabulation of the 7,403 deaths.

David Shulkin, VA undersecretary for health, noted the slight decline from the 2010 estimate, but added, “it’s still far too high.”

The 2014 count is the first slice of a massive examination of 55 million veteran death records dating back to 1979. Shulkin said that a final report due in several weeks will detail more suicide trends.

The VA found the worst suicide pattern among male veterans, ages 18-29. Their suicide rate was 86 per 100,000 people,  nearly four times the rate among active-duty service members last year.

By contrast, the overall U.S. suicide rate is 13 per 100,000 people, according to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention.

The new figures show the suicide rate among young female veterans, ages 18-29, was 33 per 100,000 — more than double the overall U.S. rate.

Shu

lkin said the suicide rate among all female veterans was more than double that of women who didn’t serve in the military.

“It is difficult to understand why that is happening. It is one of the things that I think will become a central research question for us,” he said.

Shulkin said more research is needed to determine whether women who served closer to combat or experienced sexual trauma in the military put them at greater risk of taking their own lives.

He said the VA has taken several “aggressive” steps to deal with the high suicide rates. They include adding staff to the crisis hotline for veterans (800-273-8255), identifying veterans at high risk, increasing mental health counselors and expanding mental health

therapy via telephone.

In 2014, veterans accounted for 18% of all suicides in the United States, but made up only 8.5% of the population. In 2010, veterans accounted for 22% of U.S. suicides and 9.7% of the population.

HHS Eases Buprenorphine Prescribing

Here is the “official definition” of C-II & C-III drugs… HHS is encouraging the prescribing of Buprenorphine a C-III medication in place of a pt taking a C-II medication..  I wonder how the DEA determined what a medication’s “potential” for abuse is/was. Since measuring a person’s degree of an addictive personality disorder is very subjective… not like taking someone’s BLOOD PRESSURE, BLOOD SUGAR, CHOLESTEROL… I guess it is like trying to guess how many times you can split a hair ?

Schedule II substances are those that have the following findings:

The drug or other substances have a high potential for abuse
The drug or other substances have currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, or currently accepted medical use with severe restrictions
Abuse of the drug or other substances may lead to severe psychological or physical dependence.


Schedule III substances are those that have the following findings:

  1. The drug or other substance has a potential for abuse less than the drugs or other substances in schedules I and II.
  2. The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.
  3. Abuse of the drug or other substance may lead to moderate or low physical dependence or high psychological dependence

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Substances_Act   

    HHS Eases Buprenorphine Prescribing

    New rule raises cap on number of patients physicians can treat

    http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/Addictions/58923?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2016-07-07&eun=g578717d0r

    WASHINGTON — The Obama administration announced a new rule that could lower the death toll from opioid overdoses, but the changes will be mostly meaningless without additional funding, officials said.

    The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) officially raised the limit on the number of individuals for whom prescribers can order medication assisted treatment (MAT), specifically buprenorphine, from 100 to 275.

    “In the absence of congressional action, we’re taking every step forward that we can,” said HHS Secretary Sylvia Burwell, referring to the stalemate in Congress over appropriating adequate funding for opioids.

    Burwell announced the final rule alongside other key leaders in the administration during a press call Tuesday afternoon.

    She also announced a Request for Information soliciting public comments about current HHS prescriber education and training programs and seeking new proposals; and spoke of plans to launch a dozen studies aimed at understanding opioid abuse and pain management. Burwell will be speaking with governors about the epidemic late next week, she said.

    More than 28,000 Americans died from opioid overdoses in 2014.

    The White House announced plans in February to spend $1.1 billion to alleviate the opioid crisis, but Congress has yet to make the needed appropriations.

    “These funds would help make sure that everyone with an opioid disorder who wants treatment can get treatment,” Burwell said.

    HHS’s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) anticipates that between 500 and 1,800 providers will request to increase the patient limit on buprenorphine in the rule’s first year. If each of these prescriber increases his or her load by about 20-50 patients, the overall increase in patients receiving buprenorphine could range from 10,000 to 90,000 in the first year, said Chris Jones, PhD, MPH, PharmD, ASPE’s science policy director.

    Jones estimates that the new rule could allow between 2,000 and 15,000 new patients access to buprenorphine in later years.

    In 2014, approximately 600-700, 000 of the roughly 1 million Americans who received some type of medication assisted treatment, were prescribed buprenorphine, he said.

    Botticelli noted that the increase in the patient cap is coupled with other changes included in the President’s budget request including increasing the number of providers who can prescribe buprenorphine and deploying them to areas where they’re needed most.

     

    Congress has busied itself writing more than a dozen new bills, including the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (CARA). However, none of these bills comes close to providing the $1.1 billion investment promised by the White House.

    A House-Senate conference committee is to take up the CARA bill this week. The Republican draft conference report doesn’t include the President’s request, according to the administration. However, all of the Democratic conferees have signed a letter requesting $920 million in funding, to be offset with reductions in “overpayment for certain Part B infusion drugs” and durable medical equipment.

    The administration said many of the CARA provisions mirror its own priorities. But without substantial funding, “they are really insufficient to make a dent in providing treatment for people who desperately need it,” said Michael Botticelli, director of National Drug Control Policy, on Tuesday’s call.

    Botticelli also said that Congressional Democrats will not back a bill unless it has a “significant infusion of resources.” In response to questions about whether President Obama would veto such a bill, Botticelli called any speculations “premature.”

    Asked whether Congress could be expected to take action on opioids when it continues to delay funding the Zika virus, Botticelli said opioids is “top of the list” of urgent health priorities.

    “I think it’s very hard to walk away from the fact that there are 129 people dying every single day of an opioid overdose, many of those folks who could have been prevented [from dying] by receiving timely access to treatment.”

    In addition to raising the patient limit for qualified providers, the new HHS rule removes pain management questions from the scoring of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey; and expands access to resources to help prescribers make safe decisions.

    Burwell said that while there is little data to support a connection between survey questions and prescriber behavior, the changes to the survey scoring were made due to “an abundance of caution.” The questions will remain so that pain management data can continue to be explored.

    The rule is slated to take effect on Aug. 5, 2016.

    The administration also announced a series of additional steps addressing opioids, such as requiring physicians in VA facilities and the Indian Health Services to check their Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) before prescribing or dispensing the medication for more than 7 days.

Breaking news on preventable deaths

alcoholnews

Just because they don’t ask.. doesn’t mean that the pt cannot ask for pain medication

CMS angers hospitals with plans for site-neutral rates in outpatient payment rule

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160706/NEWS/160709964

The CMS has responded to calls to eliminate patient satisfaction on pain management from Medicare’s value-based purchasing program. The agency angered hospitals, however, with plans to stop paying their off-campus facilities the same as hospital-based outpatient departments.

Both policies are included in the proposed rule for the 2017 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System issued Wednesday.

The CMS’ actuary has estimated that so-called site-neutral payments for ambulatory care, which Congress called for a 2015 spending bill, would save Medicare about $500 million in 2017. The American Hospital Association quickly issued a harshly worded statement criticizing the CMS for declining to include support for hospital outpatient departments.

The AHA was among several prominent healthcare associations that had called on the Obama administration to stop incorporating patients’ responses to pain-management questions in the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) in the value-based purchasing program. HCAHPS results are a significant factor in how hospitals fare under value-based purchasing, and providers have complained the program gives them a financial incentive to over-prescribe painkillers to keep patients happy.

The survey asks patients if they needed medicine for pain, how often their pain was well controlled and—of most concern to the healthcare industry—if the hospital staff did everything they could to help with the pain.

“Some stakeholders believe that the linkage of the pain management dimension questions to the Hospital VBP program payment incentives creates pressure on hospital staff to prescribe more opioids,” the CMS said in the proposed rule. The agency said removing the questions from the survey would “mitigate even the perception that there is financial pressure to overprescribe opioids.”

However, the CMS also said in a news release that it still believes pain control is “an appropriate part of routine patient care that hospitals should manage.” The agency is currently developing and field-testing new questions to add to the program.

The CMS is proposing to increase the rate for hospital outpatient services by 1.6%, or $671 million, and ambulatory surgical centers by 1.2%, or $39 million, in 2017 compared with 2016.

In response to the rule’s provisions on site-neutral payments for outpatient services, AHA Vice president Tom Nickels said in a statement that the lack of support for outpatient care provided by hospitals “does not reflect the reality of how hospitals strive to serve the needs of their communities.”

Nickels also called it “unreasonable and troubling” that the CMS does not plan to continue paying hospitals their current rates if they relocate or rebuild outpatient facilities. “Taken together, it appears that CMS is aiming to freeze the progress of hospital-based health care in its tracks,” Nickels said.

The draft rule does include exceptions for dedicated off-campus emergency departments. The CMS notes in its news release that the higher payments received by hospital-owned facilities are a long-standing concern among the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, HHS’ Office of Inspector General and lawmakers. Many policy experts believe hospitals are acquiring physician offices at a rapid clip because of the higher rates.

America’s Essential Hospitals, a trade group that represents safety net providers, said the CMS “appeared to ignore Congress’ intent” to use a different payment system for new hospital-owned outpatient facilities. “Hospital systems that otherwise would seek to enhance access by establishing new clinics in underserved areas will not do so, as this damaging payment policy makes new outpatient centers economically unsustainable,” the organization said in a statement.

The 764-page proposal also includes changes to the Medicare incentive program for hospitals’ use of electronic health records, including allowing hospitals to use any 90-day period in 2016 to attest that they’ve met the requirements.

now they are trying to tie cardiovascular deaths to long acting opiates

sickheartLong-acting opioid therapy linked to increased mortality risk

http://www.clinicaladvisor.com/pain-information-center/increased-mortality-risk-with-long-acting-opioid-therapy/article/507694/

Prescription of long-acting opioid medications for chronic, noncancer pain is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality when compared to alternative medications, according to research published in JAMA.

Wayne A. Ray, PhD, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, and colleagues conducted a retrospective cohort study of Tennessee Medicaid patients with chronic, noncancer pain between 1999 and 2012. Patients had received either long-acting opioid therapy or comparable therapy with either an analgesic anticonvulsant or low-dose cyclic antidepressant. Patients had not received palliative or end-of-life care.

The researchers found 22,912 new episodes of prescribed therapy for both long-acting opioids and control medications; 185 deaths were recorded in the long-acting opioid group, compared to 87 deaths recorded in the control group. Data analysis showed that patients who were prescribed long-acting opioid therapy had a 1.6 times greater risk of all-cause mortality and a 1.9 times greater risk of out-of-hospital death.

“More than two-thirds of the excess deaths were due to causes other than unintentional overdose; of these, more than one-half were cardiovascular deaths,” noted Dr Ray. “These findings should be considered when evaluating harms and benefits of treatment.”

 

Contrary to popular belief… ADA does (seldom) gets enforced..

McDonald’s Management Responds to Lawsuit

http://www.nwahomepage.com/news/mcdonalds-management-responds-to-lawsuit

A company that manages a Bentonville McDonald’s responded on Wednesday to accusations it fired an employee for being HIV positive.

According to a lawsuit filled by the U.S. Equal Employement Opportunity Commision, the restaurant violated federal law by firing the employee for having HIV, and it also violated the Americans with Disabilities Act by maintaining a policy of requiring all employees to report the use of prescription medication.

Mathews Management issued the following statement regarding the lawsuit:
 
“It is our policy to provide equal employment to all persons regardless of physical or mental disability, or any other characteristic protected by federal, state or local law. We deny that Plantiff’s separation was based on his medical status. These allegations are without merit and we will vigorously defend this baseless claim.” 

Could healthcare professionals being drawn into a trap ?

carrottstickWe are all aware of the push to try and get Naloxone (Narcan) into as many pockets as possible. And who has the most a need for Naloxone… substance abusers… and as of 1917 our court system decided that the mental health disease of addictive personality disorder is going forward a CRIME.

So what happens if the DEA gets a hold of wholesaler records of what pharmacies are purchasing above average units of Naloxone and/or gets insurance records of what pharmacies and/or which prescribers has been writing or selling Naloxone.

Could that information be used to suggest that the prescriber or pharmacies is prescribing and/or selling Naloxone to people that the Pharmacist and/or prescriber had concerns that the pt was “abusing” their opiates.

So the DEA could come to the conclusion that the Pharmacist or Doctor is writing/filling Rxs for pts that don’t have a legit medical need.. and thus breaking the law.

Given previous actions of the DEA .. all they need is the OPINION that one or two pts are not legit for them to raid a doc’s practice and/or pharmacy.

baithookAll that talk about “doing good” and helping save lives of those suffering from addiction… could it be just “bait on a hook ” ?

We probably won’t see any action out of the DEA on this issue until all the states has put regulations in place for Naloxone to be OTC… which may be another year or two.

Compared to the preventable deaths from medical errors .. opiate OD deaths are a non-issue ?

RxtotheheadOvercoming Obstacles to Medication Error Reporting

http://www.pharmacytimes.com/contributor/alan-polnariev-pharmd-ms-cgp/2016/07/overcoming-obstacles-to-medication-error-reporting

In 1999, the landmark paper “To Err is Human” estimated 100,000 deaths are caused by medication errors each year.1 More recently, a 2013 article cited the related death toll between 210,000 and 440,000.2
 
According to a 2012 study, preventable medical errors cost the US economy as much as $1 trillion annually in “lost human potential and contributions.”3 The study’s researchers used quality-adjusted life years to develop what they called a “more complete accounting of the economic impact when someone dies from a preventable error.”3
 
Still, their figures may represent only the tip of the iceberg. For every reported medication error that causes injury to a patient, there may be as many as 100 errors that go unreported or undetected. 
 
Results from other research indicate the frequency of medication error reporting could be improved if the process of reporting errors were made easier and staff was adequately educated about reporting and received timely feedback about the results from the reports submitted. To reach this conclusion, the investigators conducted in-depth interviews and focus groups with physicians, pharmacists, and nurses from 4 community hospitals and compiled a list of the most commonly cited barriers to medication error reporting:5

  1. Extra time required in reporting
  2. Cumbersome report forms
  3. Hesitancy about “telling” on someone
  4. Perceived severity of the error

The researchers recommended 3 interventions that could overcome barriers to medication error reporting.
 
The first was reducing reporter burden to simplify the process of reporting errors as a means to increase reporter compliance. The general consensus of the study participants was incident reporting systems were “not user friendly, and as a result, took too long to complete.”
 
The second recommendation was improving the channels of communication between senior management and front-line staff, as “many participants voiced frustration that they did not receive feedback about error reports that had been submitted.” Participants commonly expressed the desire to receive recognizable feedback from administration.
 
The third recommendation was increasing awareness and education to help front-line staff better understand the process of reporting (how to report, why to report, and how reports were being used). Education is an important feature because skeptics may not be completely persuaded that reporting errors improves patient safety. 
 
All 3 of those interventions may help staff members feel more confident about reporting medication errors and contributing to efforts to advance patient safety.
 
“Reporting should be made as easy as possible (forms should be accessible and straightforward), people should receive timely feedback about reports submitted, and people should receive up-to-date education about all aspects of the medication error reporting process at their hospitals,” the researchers concluded.5 
 
The simple yet effective approaches they offered are an excellent foundation to not only improve medication error reporting, but also markedly improve the frequency of reported medication errors. Still, broader approaches are warranted. Identifying the hurdles health care professionals face on a regular basis is an important first step to improve error reporting, but there’s plenty more work to be done.
 
Nobody has all of the answers to the problem, but arriving at the solution involves brainstorming sessions and the combined efforts of interdisciplinary health care teams. Most approaches to address this problem will likely fall into 1 of 3 categories: organizational culture, system improvements, and staff education.
 
Organizational culture focuses on the behaviors, stigmas, and attitudes toward patient safety processes in a health care setting. How senior management responds to reported errors from front-line staff is one example. Another is a structured process to prioritize and thoroughly investigate medication errors and patient safety concerns.
 
System improvements involve communication channels for sharing information (eg, error reporting systems) and their accessibility and ease of use in allowing reporters to enter the details of a medication error efficiently and effectively. Providing a highly visible and open means of communicating information between senior management and front-line staff is an essential component of the error reporting cycle.
 
Finally, staff education would encompass topics like which incidents should be reported; differentiating terms like medication error, adverse drug event, and near miss; and how to properly report an incident.
 
Medication errors are as a dire a concern today as they were in 1999. The call to action is loud and clear, with hundreds of thousands of lives lost and hundreds of billions of dollars spent annually. The health care industry can’t afford to stay idle any longer. 
 
In order to prevent medication errors, we must modify how we view them and learn from our past mistakes. Understanding how to overcome obstacles to error reporting is a great way to start.  – See more at: http://www.pharmacytimes.com/contributor/alan-polnariev-pharmd-ms-cgp/2016/07/overcoming-obstacles-to-medication-error-reporting#sthash.8NaWuRWe.dpuf

Someone doesn’t know how to count or using different criteria as to what is a “drug death”

Two reports offer different numbers for drug deaths in Pennsylvania

http://www.readingeagle.com/news/article/two-reports-offer-different-numbers-for-drug-deaths-in-pennsylvania&template=mobileart

Glaring differences between two high-profile reports on how many people died from drug overdoses in Pennsylvania in 2014 have called into question the reliability of numbers given to the public on the toll of the heroin and opioid drug crisis.

The reports were produced by the Pennsylvania State Coroners Association and the federal Drug Enforcement Administration. The coroners association report lists 2014 drug death totals for Lehigh, Chester and Lebanon counties as 85, 82 and 15, while the federal report lists the totals as 66, 36 and 11, respectively.

TODAY’S SPONSOR:

The reports show large discrepancies involving many other counties, as well. Both got media coverage across the state.”I think it’s important to get the numbers right,” said Frances Cortez Funk, director of health promotion and alcohol and other drug services at Kutztown University. “The numbers are important because every number represents a life.”

Berks County Coroner Denny Hess said drug death numbers generated by coroners have changed as they pass through the state Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs, which has served as a resource for the DEA.

He said he had no indication the changes were intentional, but they made the information inaccurate.”Ours are real numbers,” he said. “Nobody is looking at the state and saying, ‘Why are they changing those numbers?’ “Hess’ office sends reports on drug deaths to DDAP and the state coroners association. The association’s legislative liaison, Susan Shanaman, said she has found inaccuracies in a DDAP spreadsheet on statewide drug deaths.”I have found discrepancies in the numbers, where I know the data has been sent to both DDAP and myself. I don’t have an explanation for why DDAP’s numbers are fewer,” Shanaman said.DDAP spokesman Jason Snyder said any assertion the department gave out information significantly different from what it had collected was “unequivocally false.”He said human error may have produced a few mistakes in a spreadsheet, but it would not explain the “sweeping discrepancies” between the two reports.”What comes in to DDAP goes out, just as it came in,” Snyder said.He stressed the importance of accurate data.”There is no question about that. We do need to come up with a way where we are sure what we are looking at is accurate,” Snyder said. “This is something on a lot of people’s radar screens.”But he said questions about the accuracy of two reports should be put to the organizations that produced them.On Wednesday afternoon, the author of the DEA report, Laura Hendrick, said in a telephone interview that DEA’s source material for its 2014 report included a spreadsheet from DDAP. She said it was understood that the spreadsheet was “not complete” because it did not include information from some counties.DEA will issue revisions to some of its 2014 numbers when it issues the 2015 report, Hendrick said. All of the revisions will be increases in county totals.State Rep. Gen Yaw, a Lycoming County Republican who has gone around the state for hearings about the heroin crisis, said he heard of differences between the reports and then learned that the DEA had changed its 2014 numbers.He said he believed the 2014 coroners association report was the more accurate of the two.But Shanaman, who compiled the association report, acknowledged it had at least one inaccuracy.The single largest county discrepancy involved Bucks, for which the coroners’ association reported 205 deaths and the DEA 113 deaths. In that case, Shanaman said her Bucks drug death tally included many fatalities where drugs were present but did not actually cause the death.”Bucks is the only one I did that on,” she said.Coroners are not required by law to report drug deaths. Some coroners – especially those in counties with very few deaths – worry that sharing data on them might lead to identities becoming known, against families’ wishes.Hendrick, who is the highest ranking intelligence officer in DEA’s Philadelphia Field Division, said the original sources for all the data in both reports are county coroners.In some cases, the DEA has issued subpoenas to obtain information from coroners, she said. The lack of mandatory reporting has hampered efforts to get good data.”We have struggled for years to get this information,” she said.At the same time, she said, the type of training and experience of each coroner may affect how they classify deaths. And they have latitude in deciding which deaths to report.”There is a lot of leeway,” she said.Yaw has floated a concept for strengthening the drug death reporting system with other lawmakers.He said, “We need accurate reporting.”Chuck Kiessling, Lycoming County coroner and president of the association, said it was vital to have accurate information. The number of deaths, he said, gives the public a “gauge” to measure the drug crisis.Shanaman said she believed coroners should remain the primary conduits for information.She described them as “the guys and gals who are there and who are seeing the bodies and seeing the deaths up close and personal.”