Philippines President: kill the addicts/junkies and drug sellers

Philippines President Makes Good on Pledge to Mass Murder People Who Use or Sell Drugs, Calls for “No Mercy” in State of the Nation Address

http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/2016/07/philippines-president-makes-good-pledge-mass-murder-people-who-use-or-sell-drugs-calls-

Apparently the President of the Philippines is putting together a full blown GENOCIDE.. unlike the USA that is just taking away the pain management of millions of people .. who end up going to the street and dying from using Heroin/Fentanyl street drugs or just commits suicide… which in this process is just more like a “passive genocide ” ?

President Estimates 100,000 People Will Be Killed; Several Hundred Already Executed Extra-Judicially

Drug Policy Alliance: Stop the Philippines Drug War Killings Now

Today, the President of the Philippines delivered his “State of the Nation Address.”  He vowed to show “no mercy” in his bloody war on drugs and crime, warning criminals that priests and human rights advocates cannot protect them from being killed.

Rodrigo Duterte was elected last month after promising to wipe out crime and corruption throughout the country, relying heavily on an anti-drug campaign centered around murdering people who use or sell drugs. Duterte has encouraged law enforcement, and even civilians, to kill people suspected of selling drugs and people who struggle with addiction. He said, “If you know of any addicts, go ahead and kill them yourself as getting their parents to do it would be too painful.”

“I strongly suspect that Filipinos will come to regret their election of a president who expresses such contempt for basic principles of due process and human rights,’ said Ethan Nadelmann, Executive Director of the Drug Policy Alliance. “A government that condones extra-judicial killings of people who use or sell drugs will eventually turn its terror on others – it’s just a matter of time.”

During his campaign, Duterte estimated that 100,000 people would die as a result of this crackdown. According to AFP, Duterte has not been deterred by the human rights concerns opponents have raised about lack of due process. Additionally, as part of his initiative, Duterte promises to fully pardon anyone involved with the killing of people who use or sell drugs. Last week, police announced a plan to erect a large electronic billboard outside their headquarters in Manila that will keep track of all these drug-related killings.

There has been a notable silence from the international community. So far, the only country to weigh in has been China – and they have been supportive of Duterte’s drug policies.

Historically, the Philippines has had a conservative approach to drug policy and maintained harsh drug laws, such as 20 years of imprisonment for possession of 5 grams or more of any type of drug. But Duterte’s approach is unprecedented; he has escalated an already-tough drug policy to the extreme, eliciting terror and violence throughout the country.

“In 1985 I was sentenced to 15 years-to-life for a first time, nonviolent drug offense, and it blows me away to hear about the draconian drug policy that the President of the Philippines is championing,” said Anthony Papa, author of This Side of Freedom and manager of media relations at the Drug Policy Alliance. “We have some terrible drug policies in the U.S., like mandatory minimum sentences, but I have never seen anything like the killings that are happening in the Philippines right now.”

DEA: Pot Growers ‘The New Meth Labs’

liarliarDEA Flakes on Promise to Reschule Cannabis, Instead Calls Pot Growers ‘The New Meth Labs’

Last December, we began hearing rumors that the DEA might change its absurd stance on cannabis and remove it from the list of Schedule 1 drugs with “no medicinal value.” The agency sent a letter to lawmakers in April saying it will release a decision on rescheduling “in the first half of 2016.”

Freedom advocates and medical cannabis patients eagerly anticipated this rare bit of rationality from federal government. Lawmakers who value modern knowledge urged the DEA to fulfill their promise, as the Schedule 1 status makes scientific inquiry near impossible. Study after study is showing the amazingly diverse ways that cannabis can heal human ailments through stimulation of the endocannabinoid system.

Alas, the first half of the year ended on June 30 and the DEA failed to uphold its promise. A spokesman said in early July, “We aren’t holding ourselves to any artificial time frame,” and there is no update on the possibility of rescheduling cannabis.

It’s another example of how putting faith in government is not a good idea. No one is really waiting on the DEA to come to its senses anyway, as half the states in the nation have legalized medical cannabis and hardly anyone still believes the plant should remain illegal.

We should expect nothing less from the tyrannical Drug Enforcement Agency, anyway, as its corruption, its subservience to Big Pharma and its predatory behavior on innocent citizens is well documented. The agency has too much revenue and power to lose if people gain the freedom to use the cannabis plant.

Perhaps this is why, in contradiction of the current scientific body of knowledge, DEA chief Chuck Rosenberg said of cannabis, “don’t call it medicine — that is a joke.”

To further demonstrate the authoritarian vileness of this agency that feeds on the immoral War on Drugs, the same “chardonnay-sipping” DEA lawyer who anonymously told the Santa Monica Observer the rescheduling cannabis will happen in August, had this to say more recently:

“I will remind everyone that Congress vested the DEA with authority to enforce the nation’s drug laws. Don’t even think of challenging our authority. Because ultimately, what you will get to use is only what we will allow.”

It gets worse.

As Colorado has legalized recreational, as well as medicinal, cannabis and is now proving the astounding benefits this brings—and disproving the fear-mongering propaganda of prohibitionists—the DEA appears to be in quite the tizzy.

Like a pouting child, it digs in its heels and ups the deception tactics. In June the DEA put out a so-called intelligence report, totaling three pages, titled Residential Marijuana Grows in Colorado: The New Meth Houses?

Yes, they are actually trying to draw a parallel with a highly addictive synthetic chemical drug that actually kills people and has no medicinal value. Because, you know, extremely flammable, extremely toxic ingredients used in meth production are just like potting soil and fertilizer.

After lamenting the fact that Colorado is not limiting or regulating home grown cannabis, they suggest that there is “a proliferation of large-scale marijuana grow operations in hundreds of homes throughout the state.”

Without citing any actual figures, the report states:

“Local police departments often receive numerous calls from neighbors about marijuana grow houses. Common complaints include strong odors, excessive noise from industrial air-conditioning units, blown electrical transformers, and heavy vehicle traffic.”

It goes on to list how various problems “often” occur at grow houses (“often” is used in every sentence), such as mold, or residents drilling holes in walls or tampering with electrical systems. They paint the scenario of loose wires touching propane, with no actual examples of this happening.

This fictitious scenario must be the basis for their completely unfounded repot title. The “intelligence report” turns out to be just a half-baked piece of propaganda which runs counter to reality.

Mason Tvert of the Marijuana Policy Project told Marijuana.com in an email, “Colorado’s laws have shifted the vast majority of marijuana growing out of homes and into tightly controlled facilities,” Mason Tvert of the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) told Marijuana.com in an email. “If an adult is doing it privately and in accordance with state laws, it is no more dangerous than an adult brewing his or her own beer.”

The DEA report suggests that the purported danger is driven by “drug traffickers and criminal organizations” setting up large-scale grow houses to ship product out of state. Even if this is posing some degree of a problem to the electrical grid or what not, there is one cause—prohibition.

Dangers associated with drugs—such as health risks and violence—are created by a black market which exists only because of government prohibition.

When a substance is decriminalized, the black market shrinks to insignificance and people can purchase products from known, reputable vendors committed to quality and safety.

So, by applying logic, if cannabis is legalized throughout the country, then cannabis will be grown in all states—thus eliminating the demand for Colorado to supply other parts of the country.

The “drug traffickers and criminal organization” would wither away and the purported dangers they bring to home grows in Colorado would be a non-issue.

It’s really simple, DEA. We just need you to go away, and everything will be fine.
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/dea-reclassify-cannabis-drug-war/#LFKmSUgCLooAMYrd.99

Krispy Kreme doughnut glaze contains METHAMPHETAMINE ?

Florida man arrested after officer mistakes Krispy Kreme doughnut glaze for meth

http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2016/07/29/florida-man-arrested-after-officer-mistakes-krispy-kreme-donut-glaze-for-meth/

A 64-year-old Orlando, Fla., man is seeking damages from the city after he was handcuffed, arrested, jailed and strip-searched for possession of a highly addictive substance known to cause temporary euphoria.

No, not crystal meth. But it was something that many consider to be just as addictive: the sugary glaze from a Krispy Kreme doughnut.

Daniel Rushing had taken a neighbor to the hospital for a chemotherapy session and was driving an elderly friend home from her job at a 7-Eleven last December when he was pulled over for speeding, according to a report in the Orlando Sentinel.

When Rushing, a retiree who worked in the Orlando parks department for 25 years, opened his wallet to take out his driver’s license, Cpl. Shelby Riggs-Hopkins saw that he had a concealed-weapons permit.

Rushing disclosed to the officer that he was carrying a weapon, and she then asked him to step out of his car. And that’s when she spotted “a rock like substance on the floor board where his feet were.”

“I recognized through my eleven years of training and experience as a law enforcement officer the substance to be some sort of narcotic,” the eight-year veteran of the force wrote in Rushing’s arrest report.

Riggs-Hopkins field-tested the substance twice, and both times it came up positive for amphetamines. After she read Rushing his Miranda rights, he “stated that he has never done any drugs in his life and he has no idea now the substance got in his vehicle. Rushing stated that the substance is sugar from a Krispie Kreme Donut that he ate.”

Rushing told the Orlando Sentinel that he had to wait anxiously for six weeks until a report from Florida’s state crime lab confirmed that he’d been telling the truth all along. But he’s already spent about 10 hours in jail – he was released on $2,500 bond – for possessing the remains of a doughnut.

“It was incredible,” Rushing told the Sentinel. “It feels scary when you haven’t done anything wrong and get arrested … It’s just a terrible feeling.”

He said he agreed to let Riggs-Hopkins search his car because “I didn’t have anything to hide.

“I’ll never let anyone search my car again.”

The police department did not explain why the doughnut glaze tested positive for amphetamine in both field tests. In a statement, the department said the arrest was a lawful one.

Earlier this month, a New York Times investigation on roadside drug tests found that the testing kits used by Florida officers are far from reliable:

There are no established error rates for the field tests, in part because their accuracy varies so widely depending on who is using them and how. Data from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement lab system show that 21 percent of evidence that the police listed as methamphetamine after identifying it was not methamphetamine, and half of those false positives were not any kind of illegal drug at all.

Rushing has not said how much money he is seeking from the city. His attorney, William Ruffier, told the Sentinel he expects to file a suit against the city in August. 

 
 

 
 

Montana: Is this what you get when attorneys are in charge of medical care ?

Cancer-stricken former state rep. appeals to AG on medical-marijuana enforcement

http://www.kxlh.com/story/32542317/cancer-stricken-former-state-rep-appeals-to-ag-on-medical-marijuana-enforcement

HELENA – A former chair of the Montana Democratic Party, stricken with pancreatic cancer, has made a personal appeal to state Attorney General Tim Fox to support delaying enforcement of new restrictions on medical marijuana in the state.

Fox, however, said through a spokeswoman that his office can’t “nullify state law” or choose to go against a state Supreme Court order.

Bob Ream, a retired wildlife-biology professor and former state representative from Missoula, wrote a letter last week to Fox, a Republican, describing his recent diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and his difficulty sleeping.

Ream wrote that he’s “never been a pot-smoker,” but that medical marijuana is the only thing that has helped him get some sleep – and that “it is not possible to fight cancer and endure chemotherapy without sleep.”

New restrictions on the drug, including limiting medical-marijuana providers to only three patients, are scheduled to take effect Aug. 31.

The 2011 Legislature passed the restrictions, but they’d been tied up in court until the Montana Supreme Court upheld them in February.

However, medical-marijuana supporters in Montana have qualified a ballot measure to remove the restrictions. Montana voters will decide the issue in the Nov. 8 election.

Medical-marijuana supporters asked the state Supreme Court earlier this year to delay the effect of its ruling, until the election or until the 2017 Legislature could reconsider the issue. The court rejected that request, but did set the Aug. 31st effective date.

The marijuana industry has since asked a state District Court to intervene. Fox’s office has filed arguments saying the Supreme Court order should be carried out.

Acquaintances of Ream said he’s worried he could be among the thousands of medical-marijuana patients who would lose their provider, once the three-patient-per-provider limit becomes law.

About 13,000 people have been approved to receive medical marijuana, but only about 430 providers exist in the state – so only 1,300 patients could continue to obtain the drug from providers.

According to the DEA: the reclassification was aimed at “curbing this [opioid] misuse and abuse”

noopiatesforyouHydrocodone reclassification harms millions suffering from chronic pain

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/judicial/289741-hydrocodone-reclassification-harms-millions-suffering-from#disqus_thread

Nearly two years ago, the DEA made the lives of millions of Americans more difficult. On August 22, 2014, the agency moved hydrocodone combination drugs such as Vicodin from Schedule III to Schedule II. This reclassification created tougher rules, greater bureaucracy, stricter penalties, and a corrosive doctor-patient atmosphere for millions of Americans who suffer from chronic pain — many of whom are elderly, financially disadvantaged, or permanently disabled.

Chronic pain afflicts more than 25 million Americans according to the National Institutes of Health. Many of those people take narcotic analgesics, such as hydrocodone, to treat their pain and improve their daily lives. These prescription drugs bring relief to millions of people by reducing the burden of their pain. For many, the medicine means enjoying activities that would otherwise be excruciating. For others, it means being able to work a full-time job or being able to take care of loved ones. For all, it makes an otherwise painful existence a bit more bearable.

According to the DEA, the reclassification was aimed at “curbing this [opioid] misuse and abuse.” The Agency cited CDC reports indicating that in 2010 “seventy-five percent of the prescription drug overdose deaths (16,651 people) were due to opioid drugs primarily containing oxycodone, hydrocodone, or methadone.” However, these numbers do not distinguish between medical and recreational users. Many of those who died due to prescription drug overdose were not medically prescribed these drugs, but rather obtained them through theft or illegal purchase.

The DEA believes that they are only targeting pill mills and drug abusers, but these strict rules create artificial barriers for chronic pain patients and distort incentives for doctors and pharmacies. Under the new rules, prescriptions cannot be refilled, meaning that chronic pain patients must continuously return to the doctor for new prescriptions. The rules also place greater restrictions on distributors, which in turn reduces the total supply that pharmacies have available. This reduction in supply, coupled with the fact that pharmacies are often not allowed to tell patients over the phone if drugs are available, forces patients to drive to numerous locations before finding a facility that has their medicine in stock.

The new rules also generated a lot of alarm among pharmacists and doctors who fear investigation from the DEA. This can push doctors away from prescribing medication in favor of more expensive and risky physical procedures. Additionally, other guidelines foster medical environments to treat patients with suspicion. It is now routine for doctors to have patients with a recorded history of chronic pain urinate in a cup to prove that they are taking the medication and not selling it.

When the drug rescheduling was originally proposed, the American Medical Association came out strongly against it arguing that “the change may limit legitimate patient access to this medication.” They were right. Bureaucratic and administrative rules have serious costs. Every time a federal agency implements a new rule, it should ask itself if it’s doing more harm than good. Is the DEA protecting drug addicts or does it mainly serve as an impediment to those who are trying to find relief? In the case of the hydrocone regulation, the answer is clearly the latter.

Pain cannot be externally measured, but the number of deaths prevented can. It is much easier for the government to point to the statistical drop in the number of deaths caused by overdoses than it is to point to the amount of physical pain that has been relieved. There will always be a tendency to favor what can be externally measured over what is internally experienced, since the former can be seen by all and the latter cannot. Pain, however, is only directly observed by those it afflicts and is difficult to transport its gravity through language. In simple terms, it is easy to count bodies, and it is almost impossible to measure pain. However, that fact does not make the pain any less real.

The DEA does a great disservice to the millions of Americans who suffer from chronic pain when it ignores the barriers to pain relief that drug rescheduling creates. Regardless of the agency’s commitment to waging a War on Drugs, people who suffer from chronic pain should not have to suffer even more because of the combined actions of addicts and bureaucrats. Due to the negative effects that this policy has on millions of Americans, the DEA ought to reverse its scheduling decision on hydrocodone combination drugs.

DEA ignoring laws and violating HIPAA ?

america-in-decline-under-reign-of-king-obama-e1392670303790ACLU challenges DEA attempts to access drug database without warrants

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160729/NEWS/160729864

The American Civil Liberties Union of Utah has pushed back on the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration’s attempts to access the state’s prescription drug database without probable cause.

The ACLU requested to intervene in the DEA’s case challenging a state law that would require them to have a warrant before obtaining records from the Utah Controlled Substance Database. The database contains tens of millions of prescription records for controlled substances, including highly sensitive personal information.

The DEA did not want to reveal why they wanted unfettered access and said its federal authority supersedes state laws. The ACLU maintains that level of access would open individuals up to the risk of warrantless searches and could prevent some from seeking necessary treatment because of privacy concerns.

“This uncovering of highly sensitive and deeply personal information would violate the reasonable expectation of privacy that doctors and patients have in their protected health information,” the ACLU said in its motion to intervene.

Utah created the database in 1995, and by September 2012 it had information on more than 47 million prescription records, ACLU’s motion said. The state ultimately created greater protections for the information in 2015 after two firefighters were accused of prescription drug fraud. Those allegations stemmed from broad searches of database records.

The ACLU says that the DEA could determine individuals’ medical conditions based on the database information, which would severely compromise their privacy and violate their Fourth Amendment rights.

200,000/yr pts die of medical errors – no charges.. Single doc has two OD deaths and may get 500 yrs sentence

blindjusticeJudge: Montana physician facing 400 felonies not eligible for public defender

http://billingsgazette.com/news/crime/judge-montana-physician-facing-felonies-not-eligible-for-public-defender/article_0d84fa39-42c3-52d2-86f6-d2f3f8e6f8e7.html

I recently blogged about chronic pain refugees in MT

Montana’s ‘Pain Refugees’ Leave State To Get Prescribed Opioids

HAMILTON — A district judge ruled Monday that a Florence physician charged with 400 felonies must pay for his own defense.

Dr. Chris Christensen was initially appointed a public defender following his arrest in August for allegedly providing hundreds of illegal prescriptions to patients.

The state Office of Public Defenders rescinded the appointment of a public defender last month following a review of Christensen’s financial records.

Christensen then took his case directly to Ravalli County District Judge Jeffrey Langton. During a hearing, Christensen said he couldn’t afford the cost of legal representation considering the scale and complicity of the charges.

At that hearing, an official with the Public Defenders Office agreed to provide Langton with Christensen’s application and supporting materials under a privacy seal for the judge to review.

In his ruling, Langton noted that the chief purpose of the Montana Public Defender Act was to provide effective assistance to indigent criminal defendants.

While the law allows for the court to conditionally appoint a public defender for an initial appearance, the Office of Public Defenders is then required to verify whether the defendant meets the criteria for that appointment.

Christensen was initially represented by two attorneys, including Thomas Bartleson of the state’s major crimes unit and a private attorney.

After reviewing the financial records, Langton found that Christensen “does not even come close” to meeting the definition of “indigent” under the law.

“Nor can the Court determine that the disposable income and assets of Christensen and members of his household are insufficient to retain competent private counsel without substantial hardship to him or members of his household,” according to Langton’s ruling. “Any determination to the contrary would undermine the legislature’s legitimate governmental interest in providing taxpayer-funded public defender service to indigent criminal defendants.”

Deputy Ravalli County Attorney Thorin Geist challenged Christensen’s request for a public defender during his initial appearance.

A 16-month investigation found that Christensen’s business in Florence operated almost exclusively in cash, earned about $2,500 a day and grossed more than $500,000 annually, according to an affidavit filed in the case.

Langton ruled earlier that Christensen’s application for a public defender was to be released to the county attorney’s office. In a motion, Geist said the state wanted to see the application to determine if it could lead to additional perjury charges.

No additional charges have been filed.

The 400 felony charges filed against Christensen include two counts of negligent homicide that stem from the death of two patients who were allegedly prescribed methadone by Christensen.

The maximum penalty Christensen faces is 388 life sentences, plus 135 years in prison and fines of $20 million.

Christensen, 67, remains free on a $200,000 bond

A interesting conversation

stevephoneThis week I got a phone call from a young man whose father was all of a sudden the pharmacy that his Father had been getting his prescriptions filled at… refused to fill them any further. Of course, as we all know the earliest that any Pharmacist will fill a Rx is – at most – three days. I am not sure how many days this pt had or didn’t have… but.. he ended up in COLD TURKEY WITHDRAWAL.

This pt has – like many chronic pain pts – a list of co-morbidity issues and for all practical purpose.. is extremely medically fragile … the bottom line is that this pt ended up suffering from a heart attack … luckily … he survived.

All Pharmacists should be very familiar with the potential consequences of cold turkey withdrawal on a pt… the worse being a hypertensive crisis… causing a heart attack, stroke and/or death.

Have we reached the point where pts should be – at the very least – start having an attorney to send letters to these Pharmacists and putting them on notice that if the pt suffers a stroke or especially dies.. that the attorney has been instructed to file manslaughter charges against the Pharmacist for the INTENTIONAL denial of care, pt abandonment, pt abuse for starters..  A Pharmacist is a “learned healthcare professional”… they knew or should have known the potential consequences – including death – for their denial of care.

Every pharmacy is required by Federal/State law to maintain a PERPETUAL INVENTORY on all C-II’s. It will be very easy for an attorney with a subpoena to quickly verify if the pharmacy had inventory on hand to fill the pt’s prescriptions on the date in question.  Verification should take < 5 minutes.

This could also prove or disprove that the pharmacy has been ordering the particular medication and if the wholesaler was rationing the pharmacy and had failed to deliver ordered medication in a timely fashion… and could the wholesaler be also charged with some crime because they knew or should have known that there was a strong possibility that one or more of the pharmacy’s pts could be thrown into cold turkey withdrawal.

It is my recommendation that every pt should audio/video their interactions with the Rx dept staff.  That way their is no doubt about what is say, done or not said or not done.

The question has to be asked… if numerous pts’ attorneys have sent letters to a pharmacy/Pharmacist but a pt died from being thrown into cold turkey who did not have an attorney send a letter.. could the fact that the Pharmacist had been warned about throwing pts into cold turkey withdrawal be used to file charges against the Pharmacist for manslaughter ?

Does the law mandate that the Pharmacist has to be sent a letter regarding a particular pt in order for charges to be filed ?

Veteran Commits Suicide Hours After Being Turned Away At VA Facility

Veteran Commits Suicide Hours After Being Turned Away At VA Facility – Rest In Peace

americanmilitarynews.com/2016/07/veteran-commits-suicide-hours-after-being-turned-away-at-va-facility-rest-in-peace/?utm_source=usmilitary&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=alt

Wasn’t it one of the Presidential candidates that stated something to the fact that the problems with the VA hospitals were OVER BLOWN ?  I wonder if this former Marine’s family would agree with that statement ?

A former Marine and Army National Guardsmen killed himself after being denied admittance to a VA facility in Iowa City, despite telling doctors that he was having “serious mental issues.”

Brandon Ketchum, 33, killed himself only a few hours after being turned down at the Iowa City VA Medical Center on July 7th. He made an emergency appointment with the facility and spoke to doctors about his struggle.

Ketchum had been struggling with PTSD and substance abuse after returning home from his three tours overseas. He had deployed twice to Iraq as a Marine combat engineer where his job was to clear roadside explosives. He also served once in Afghanistan in the Army National Guard.

After getting turned away, Ketchum created a post on social media.

“I requested that I get admitted to 9W (psychiatric ward) and get things straightened out,” he wrote on Facebook. “I truly felt my safety and health were in jeopardy, as I discussed with the doc. Not only did I get a ‘NO’, but three reasons of no based on me being not f***** up enough. At this point I say, ‘why even try anymore?’ They gave up on me, so why shouldn’t I give up on myself? Right now, that is the only viable option given my circumstances and frame of mind.”

 

Brandon’s girlfriend, Kristine Nichols said that he had been having a hard time coping with PTSD and his substance abuse and addiction got worse as he first used painkillers but then moved to heroin.

According to Nichols, Brandon visited the same psychiatrist that he had been seeing for over a year.

“It wasn’t like a new person. He (the psychiatrist) knows Brandon’s history, he knew he was flagged for suicide with the VA,” Nichols told WKOW. “At least two occasions in the past three years he’s been flagged for suicide.”

While serving, he had been through several explosions and ended up with Traumatic Brain Injuries(TBI’s) and concussions.

Jamie Johnson, the public affairs officer for the Iowa City VA Medical Center said in an email to WKOW that there was enough room in the facility to admit Ketchum, and even if there wasn’t they would have found room for him at another facility.

“Generally speaking, I can tell you that we do not have a wait list for beds,” Johnson wrote in the email. “If we have openings and a patient requires admission they are admitted. If a patient requires admission and we do not have beds available at our facility, we would find them a bed at another facility.”

In order to honor Ketchum’s name and help veterans suffering with PTSD and their families, a fellow Marine who served with Ketchum is attempting to create a non-profit retreat in Texas called “Ketchum’s House.”

 

More legislators practicing medicine without a license ?

unclesambadAs lower-dosage law nears, Maine doctors prepare to wean patients off opioids

http://www.pressherald.com/2016/07/27/as-lower-dosage-law-nears-maine-doctors-prepare-to-wean-patients-off-opioids/

How long before these legislators’ actions/laws get challenged for their constitutionality?  How many pts have to be put in a torturous level of pain as healthcare providers “obey the law”… I guess their Hippocratic Oath of doing NO HARM is being superseded by LAWMAKERS.  I know that they think they are doing the right thing..  but as OD deaths continue to increase.. if nothing else from chronic painers committing suicide and be labeled as a opiate OD.

About 16,000 Mainers are affected by the stricter mandate, and some medical professionals worry they will turn to heroin.

Maine lawmakers approved one of the strictest opioid prescribing laws in the country last spring to help address the state’s growing drug epidemic. But doctors worry the law could have the unintended consequence of creating new addicts.

About 16,000 Mainers are currently prescribed high doses of opioids for chronic and acute pain, and the new law means many will have their prescriptions reduced.

 

A physicians group says that could leave patients vulnerable if no safeguards are in place. Those patients may go to the streets to acquire pills illegally – or start using heroin as a substitute.

About three of four new heroin users first abused prescription painkillers, according to the American Society of Addiction Medicine.

The Maine Medical Association, which represents doctors, is launching an aggressive public education program to ensure that the effort to solve one addiction problem doesn’t push people into another.

“We don’t want to just throw people off of this medication. We don’t want people to start getting pills from the streets or taking heroin,” said Gordon Smith, executive vice president of the medical association.

The law goes into effect Friday, and by 2017, thousands of people will be required to lower their doses, some to one-third to one-half of what they are currently prescribed. The law sets maximum doses for many patients at 100 morphine milligram equivalents per day, and mandates that doctors use the state’s prescription monitoring program to track the number and type of prescriptions each patient receives.

Experts say if implemented correctly, the law will have many benefits.

“There is light at the end of that prescription,” said Denise Swyers of Brunswick, who suffers from chronic pain. Swyers was a long-time opioid user but now no longer takes them. She said the quality of her life has improved, and her pain level is the same now as when she was taking opioids, an experience that reflects research on the topic. Swyers now gets pain relief through meditation, exercise, hobbies, ice packs and Advil, as recommended by her doctors.

Smith said his group is touring the state to educate physicians about how best to wean patients off high doses of opioids – 100 morphine milligram equivalents or higher. He said there will be at least 50 meetings with groups of physicians by the end of the year to discuss the new law.

‘A HARD BRIDGE TO CROSS’

The medical association hosted a conference July 14 in the Augusta area to advise doctors on what to say to patients whose doses are being reduced, how to spot signs of addiction and other tips to make the transition smoother.

Eva Quirion, a nurse practitioner in Bangor, said the doctor-patient conversations will be difficult, especially for patients who have been taking the painkillers for years or decades.

“If you say, ‘I have a great idea to help you with your pain, let’s take away your pain pills,’ it sounds like crazy talk,” Quirion said.

But it’s a necessary conversation, and the message will be more effective as more doctors realize the dangers of opioids, Smith said.

Another point Smith and others are trying to drive home is that opioids don’t work for chronic pain. Whether that knowledge is reaching family physicians in Portland, Lewiston, Bangor or Caribou is unknown – there has been no scientific survey of Maine doctors to see what their perceptions are, Smith said.

“Opioids have no proven efficacy for the treatment of chronic pain,” said Dr. Elizabeth Fowlie Mock of Holden. Chronic pain is mild or severe pain that lasts more than three months, according to medical definitions.

The law does provide exceptions to the dosage cap to those who are suffering from acute pain, such as end-of-life, cancer and after-surgery pain.

Pain specialists say many of the 16,000 patients should taper to a lower dose or be weaned completely off opioids, because of their ineffectiveness for chronic pain and because they carry a high risk of overdose. It’s unclear how many physicians are up-to-date on the research compared with those who still go by the prevailing standards of the early- to mid-2000s, when doctors were encouraged to prescribe opioids for many pain conditions.

HIGH USE OF LONG-TERM OPIOIDS IN MAINE

Maine has the highest rate in the nation of prescriptions issued for long-term, extended-release opioids, according to a 2014 report by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The long-term opioids, prescribed for chronic pain, are the most likely to be abused, according to the CDC. Maine doctors were prescribing those opioids at a rate more than twice the national average, according to the 2014 report, the latest available.

Maine had a record 272 drug overdose deaths in 2015, most caused by heroin, fentanyl or abuse of prescription opioids.

Now doctors have to try to undo the damage they helped cause, Mock said.

“It’s a really hard bridge to cross, but we have to cross this bridge,” she said.

On a recent day at her Brunswick home, Swyers carefully worked on her artwork – checkerboard and diamond-shaped patterns filling in the outline of a fish. Swyers and a regular group of four artists were practicing “zen tangle,” a meditative form of art that helps her create art and relieve pain at the same time.

The camaraderie also makes her feel better, Swyers said.

Swyers said she was on 50 to 75 morphine milligram equivalents per day of oxycodone to treat fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndrome, and she had slowly become a “zombie” because she was prescribed ever higher doses as her tolerance increased.

“I was in a fog. I didn’t do anything except sit in my chair,” said Swyers, who estimated she was taking opioids for eight years.

After she stopped taking high doses of oxycodone to treat chronic pain, Denise Swyers of Brunswick, second from left, discovered her pain was the same without the drugs, an experience that aligns with research on the topic. She also found that spending time with friends helped relieve her pain.

After she stopped taking high doses of oxycodone to treat chronic pain, Denise Swyers of Brunswick, second from left, discovered her pain was the same without the drugs, an experience that aligns with research on the topic. She also found that spending time with friends helped relieve her pain.

‘JUST LIVING FOR MY NEXT PILL’

Swyers said she quit “cold turkey” once she heard her slurred speech on her voice mail message.

“I sounded like I was drunk, and I said, ‘That’s it, I’m done,’ ” Swyers said. She quit taking opioids six years ago, she said.

Swyers, 68, said her life immediately changed for the better as her mental sharpness returned and she began enjoying hobbies again, including kayaking, art and reading. Her pain was the same as when she was taking opioids, meaning the pills didn’t help at all, she said.

“When I was taking opioids, I was just living for my next pill,” Swyers said.

Her husband, Bill, became a caretaker, making decisions for her because she was “out of it” most of the time.

“Looking back, I can’t even remember a lot of it. It’s like a whole section of my life is just gone,” Swyers said.

She described her pain as a dull ache primarily in her neck, back, hips and shoulders.

“What I learned is that hurt doesn’t equal harm,” said Swyers, who has worked in sales. “When the brain is distracted, the pain is a lot less.”

Dr. Heidi Decker, a primary care physician in Wilton, said she’s grateful for the new law, which she can refer to when talking with patients who are resistant to seeing their dosage reduced. But the conversations with patients are still difficult – one patient who had taken opioids for many years stormed out of her office when she told him he needed to cut back.

“I thought to myself, ‘Have I just created another heroin addict?’ ” Decker said.

DEALING WITH PATIENT RESISTANCE

Dr. Stephen Hull, director of Mercy Hospital’s Pain Center, said he would like to be optimistic about the fate of the 16,000 patients, but he expects many will resist.

“We don’t know how successful they are going to be on the lower doses,” Hull said.

But the law is needed, because while opioids are useful for acute pain – such as for end-of-life care or post-surgery – they have been proven ineffective and counterproductive at controlling chronic pain, he said.

Patients taking 50 morphine milligram equivalent doses are twice as likely to die from an overdose as a patient who is not taking any opioids, and they are nine times more likely to die at 100 morphine milligram equivalents.

“We have been treating chronic diseases that are not life-threatening with drugs that are,” Hull said.

Dr. Noah Nesin, of Penobscot Community Health, said weaning people off opioids is the right thing to do.

“Let’s make a commitment to engaging with these patients, no matter how badly they treat us, no matter how angry they get, no matter how much they say we’re ruining their lives,” he said.