Help Color The World Orange for CRPS/RSD Awareness on Nov. 7

Help Color The World Orange for CRPS/RSD Awareness on Nov. 7

Help Color The World Orange for CRPS/RSD Awareness on Nov. 7

nationalpainreport.com/help-color-the-world-orange-for-crpsrsd-awareness-on-nov-7-8831807.html

November is national CRPS/RSD awareness month, and what better way to raise awareness than by participating in the Color The World Orange annual event on November 7th.

Color The World Orange, is an annual event held the first Monday in November to spread awareness of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), also known as Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD), and is less than two weeks away, but there is still time to get involved!

color-the-world-orange-ribbonsRaising awareness is easy and FREE – The easiest way to participate is to wear orange and post a picture to social media with the hashtag: #CRPSORANGEDAY.

 

However, the team at Color The World Orange has also put together suggestions and a collection of materials to help you raise awareness – all offered for free on their website (and below).

Founded in 2014 to bring global attention to CRPS/RSD, Color The World Orange does not receive any money from its fundraisers, and in the last two years has helped supporters raise more than $11,650 for the national non-profit RSDSA, to be used for research.

More information directly from the Color The World Orange Team:

Encourage friends and family to get involved and to wear orange as well – it can be something as small as an orange bracelet or an orange t-shirt, or as elaborate as one supporter who in 2014 wore orange head to toe, literally!

Download Color The World Orange pamphlets (http://bit.ly/2draCTZ) to hand out to family and friends so they can learn more about the event as well as CRPS/RSD.
 
Speak with local businesses and ask if you can display pamphlets and orange ribbons, or ask to hang up Color The World Orange signs (http://bit.ly/2e0E7w6).
Another easy way to get involved is to change your social media backgrounds to display the Color The World Orange logos – you can download them from our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/ColorTheWorldOrange
 
If you are feeling a bit more adventurous, have an orange dinner on Nov. 7 – encourage your family to wear orange and fill the table with orange food and decorations.
 
There is also still time to reach out to local media to pitch a story about Color The World Orange and CRPS/RSD. A number of supporters were interviewed for last year’s event, which helps to build awareness of the condition. Use our ‘Build Your Own Press Release’ to reach out to your local news station and paper. A copy can be found on our Facebook page: http://bit.ly/2esV1H7
 
The most important thing is to be creative and have fun! Color The World Orange aims to bring everyone together to spread awareness of CRPS/RSD and your participation is a key aspect of the day.
 
To help light the night orange, more than 30 buildings and landmarks around the world have agreed to turn orange for Color The World Orange including Niagara Falls and Trafalgar Square in London.
 
In the US, the following buildings will be lit orange in support of Color The World Orange:
  • Retirement Systems of Alabama buildings in Mobile and Montgomery, Alabama
  • Coca-Cola Orlando Eye in Orlando, Florida
  • SunTrust Bank Building in Tampa, Florida
  • Skyview Atlanta in Atlanta, Georgia
  • IPL Building in Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Boston Harbor Hotel in Boston, Massachusetts
  • lights on France Avenue in Edina, Minnesota
  • 35W Bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • Con Edison Clock Tower, New York
  • dome of the Nassau County, New York
  • Theodore Roosevelt Executive and Legislative Building, New York
  • FDR Mid Hudson Bridge lights, New York
  • Peace Bridge, which spans the Niagara River between Fort Erie, Ontario Canada and Buffalo, New York 
  • Wells Fargo’s Duke Energy Center in Charlotte, North Carolina
  • Terminal Tower in Cleveland, Ohio
  • Myriad Botanical Gardens in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
  • Emery Towers in Bradford, Pennsylvania
  • South Street Bridge in Saegertown, Pennsylvania
  • PPL Tower in Allentown, Pennsylvania
  • dome of the Westmoreland County Courthouse in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania
  • Bank of America Plaza in Dallas, Texas
  • Houston City Hall in Houston, Texas
  • Cedar Rapids Bank & Trust in Cedar Rapids, Iowa
  • Kansas City Power and Light Building in Kansas City, Missouri
  • Crazy Horse Memorial, South Dakota
In Canada, the following buildings will also be lit orange in support:
  • BC Place in Vancouver
  • Calgary Tower in Calgary
  • High Level Bridge in Edmonton
  • Port Coquitlam City Hall in British Columbia
In the United Kingdom:
  • Central Library in Swindon Town Centre
  • Blackpool Tower in Blackpool
For more ideas on how to get involved, visit the Color The World Orange website: www.colortheworldorange.com
 
Color The World Orange was founded in 2014 to bring global attention to CRPS/RSD. 

Pharmacists are increasingly charged with the task of explaining drug price increases and health plan rules to patients

Caught in the Middle

Pharmacists are increasingly charged with the task of explaining drug price increases and health plan rules to patients

http://drugtopics.modernmedicine.com/news/caught-middle-0?page=0,0

 

EpiPendamonium. EpiPendemic. EpiPanic. The popular press has had a field day with the public outcry over the growing gap between the price of EpiPen (epinephrine auto-injectors, Mylan) and the ability of patients, even insured patients, to pay

. The furor over EpiPen pricing is simply the best publicized of many similar price hikes that have left patients unable to pay.

Jeremy Counts, PharmD“Raising the EpiPen price to more than $600 is ridiculous,” said Jeremy Counts, PharmD, owner of Main Street Pharmacy in Blackburg, VA. “Like every other pharmacist in the country, I’m having patients come in every day asking ‘what can I do? I don’t have $600.”

Pharmacist in the Middle

“What gets missed in all the media frenzy is the pharmacists who are caught in the middle,” said Dorinda Martin, PharmD, who owns three Martins Compounding and Wellness Pharmacy locations in Austin, TX. “Parents aren’t just buying one box of EpiPens, they’re buying two or three or four boxes for each child who needs it. Depending on your health plan, you may be paying $10 or you may be paying full price. So

mebody is making a good profit on EpiPens, but it isn’t the pharmacy. We just get to take patients’ totally justified anger and frustration over prices that nobody understands.”

Patients are particularly frustrated because there is no single answer for price increases. 

 

Options, Not Solutions

Whatever the reason for a particular drug price hike, pharmacists have few good choices. PUTT, Pharmacists United for Truth and Transparency, has published a poster that details EpiPen pricing. Pharmacies can use the poster to help patients understand who is profiting, said Arizona pharmacy owner and PUTT president Teresa Stickler, PharmD. But understanding pricing doesn’t help patients afford it. Or believe it.

“There is no good way to explain the price increases because they often defy logic even to us,” said Bradley Arthur, PharmD, president of the National Community Pharmacy Association. “To try to explain it to a layperson just leaves them more befuddled.”

Dr. Arthur noted that about 98 percent of his claims are paid by third parties, so patients may not even be aware of price increases. The problem is the remaining two percent that may no prescription drug coverage or have high deductible coverage that exposes patients to a significant portion of the retail price. If deductibles are high enough, patients may be responsible for the entire cost.

“Any major price increase will make it harder for patients to access their drugs,” SAID Mohamed Jalloh, PharmD, Assistant Professor of Clinical Sciences at Touro University California College of Pharmacy and Ambulatory Care Pharmacist at OLE Health in Napa, CA. “A recent is the price increase for EpiPen. Due to the drastic price increase, many patients have told me they can no longer afford it.”

Just as the reason for price increases depends on the specific product, pharmacists’ ability to help patients work around drug costs depends on the specific patient, drug and drug coverage. Pharmacists may be able to help patients navigate the Byzantine labyrinth of drug prices and copays, but they cannot solve the problem.

Patients with type 1 diabetes, for example, need insulin. They may have no choice but to pay the price or go without.

Patients with type 2 diabetes may have a little more flexibility.

“If insulin injections become too expensive for managing your type 2 diabetes,” Dr. Jalloh noted, there are so many other agents that are available and affordable. Encourage patients to sit down with you and with their physician to identify alternative agents.”

Manufacturers may have patient assistance programs that can cover all or part of the retail cost. Depending on income level and other requirements, some patients without coverage may be able to get financial help. Patient assistance programs are most common for biologics and other high-cost products, but it never hurts to check.

For patients who have some sort of third party coverage, coupons or copay cards may help. Coupons generally work to keep drug prices high and inflate spending on brand name products, explained Steven Schondelmeyer, PharmD, PhD, Professor and Head of the Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health System and Director of the PRIME Institute at the University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy. But for individual patients, coupons can be the difference between being able to afford a drug and having to go without.

Mylan, for example, has a $300 copay card that can effectively cover half of the current retail EpiPen price.

Patients can sign up for the program online. Enrollment can even be done at the point of sale and the coupon applied immediately. But it may not be enough.

“We have patients displaced at $300 for EpiPens and many more at $600,” said Amber Korn, University of North Carolina pharmacy resident at Sona Pharmacy and Clinic in Asheville, NC. PharmD. “A lot of patients are just not getting prescriptions filled because of the cost.”

Sona’s alternative is to create an epinephrine kit with drug and syringes. But a kit does not meet school requirements for an auto-injector device. Other pharmacies around the country sell similar epinephrine injector kits to patients and emergency response systems that cannot afford EpiPens.

King County (Seattle, WA) Emergency Medical Services saved more than $150,000 a year using kits instead of EpiPens. The agency sells kits, minus epinephrine, to health agencies across the region.

If generics for a high-priced product are available, it may be possible to dispense the cheaper product. Depending on the product category, therapeutic substitution may be a practical alternative.

“For dermatological products, we have had success suggesting alternatives,” Dr. Arthur said. “Unfortunately, this is not often an option with products like digoxin or those with tight therapeutic windows such as the anti-seizure meds.”

 And just because a therapeutic alternative is available doesn’t mean it is practical. It may be possible to substitute Adrenaclick (epinephrine injection, Amedra) for EpiPen, suggested Norman Tomaka, PharmD, a hospital pharmacy consultant in Melbourne, FL. That could bring the price down to around $400, but availability and insurance coverage are spotty.

“Worst case, you can dispense an injection kit,” said Dawn Butterfield, RPh, owner of West Cocoa Pharmacy and Compounding in Cocoa, FL. “A kit isn’t as convenient as an EpiPen, but it is just as effective once injected.”

            Jeremy Counts took the kit concept a step farther. He dispensed prefilled epinephrine syringes. Prefilled syringes have been standard in wilderness medicine and other price or space and weight sensitive applications for years. But shelf life is limited. And the state Board of Pharmacy soon put a stop to prefilled syringe sales.

“I cautioned my patients the FDA does not recommend prefilled syringes for more than 30 hours,” he said. “I also told them the literature says prefilled epinephrine syringes are good for three months when protected from heat and light. I absolutely encourage everyone to get an EpiPen if they can. It has better shelf life, it’s reliable, it’s easy, it’s the best solution you can get on the market today. But if you can’t afford EpiPen, a prefilled syringe or a syringe and an ampule of epinephrine can still save your life.”

Mylan has raised the price of EpiPens from about $60 before it acquired the product in 2007 to just over $600 in 2016, just in time for the back to school rush.

“EpiPen is a very seasonal product,” said industry analyst Ronny Gal, PhD, Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. “More than half of sales are in the two months ahead of the school year as parents refresh their kids’ backpacks. The recipe for this outcry is a seasonal product, purchased largely by young families that have moved to high deductible health plans and aggressive price increases by the manufacturer.”

Mylan’s aggressive pricing is hardly unique in the industry. Turing Pharmaceutical made headlines in 2015 by boosting the price of Daraprim (pyrimethamine), a single-source generic used primarily to treat parasitic infections, by 5,000 percent.

An article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in August noted that noted that the price of insulin jumped 300 percent between 2002 and 2013. Isoproterenol prices jumped 2,500 percent  and digoxin 637 percent. Despite the widespread assumption that generic drug prices generally fall, the price of some 400 generics increased more than 1,000 percent between 2008 and 2015.

 The problem

According to industry insiders, there is no single cause for price increases. Some price skyrocket just because the manufacturer can do it.

Manufacturers with patent protection for a product have free rein to set pricing. As long as the company has market exclusivity, it can set any price as long as it is willing to bear the blowback from public, providers and payers. Highly effective hepatitis C medications such as Harvoni (ledipasvir 90 mg/sofosbuvir 400 mg, Chiron) were introduced at more than $1,000 a tablet simply because the manufacturer could.

Market exclusivity give manufacturers a legal monopoly. In some cases, drug makers with products that have lost patent protection can still enjoy a functional monopoly.

“This is exclusivity that comes from being the only manufacturer of a product in the marketplace,” explained Dr. Schondelmeyer. “For a new generic to enter the market takes two, four, maybe five years to develop and get FDA marketing approval. That sole manufacturer has a functional monopoly. Some raise prices extremely aggressively, some are a little less aggressive and raise the price by ‘only’ 50 to 100 percent.”

Turing Pharmaceuticals became the poster child for aggressive price hikes after purchasing the rights to Daraprim from Impax Laboratories in 2015. Although the patent on pyrimethamine expired decades ago, Turing was the sole manufacturer. Turing chief Martin Shkreli drew fire from Wall Street to Main Street and Capitol Hill when he hiked the price of Daraprim from $13.50 to $750 per tablet.

EpiPen has a similar functional monopoly. The biggest difference is that Mylan has spread its price increases over several years, although most of the increase has come in the past three years.

EpiPen was originally approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1988 and was eventually acquired by Merck KGaA. In early 2007, the list price for EpiPens was $68. Rising generic maker Mylan acquired the product as part of a larger purchase.

Since 2007, Mylan has had little competition. Marketing and lobbying campaigns have boosted awareness of anaphylactic shock, the utility of epinephrine and the safety of its auto-injector.  EpiPens are available at Disney parks, on airliners and schools nationwide. Other companies have tried, and largely failed, to enter the epinephrine auto-injector market.

By July, 2013, the price was up to $265, then jumped to $461 in 2015. This year the price jumped to $608. Mylan has announced a generic version of EpiPen that could be available later this year for $300.

Products that are about to lose patent protection often see steep price increases toward the end of market exclusivity. Manufacturers want to extract the maximum profit possible before generic competition and new entrants force prices lower. Analysts speculate that the potential for generic competition and competing formulations could be one reason behind the rising rate of EpiPen price increases over the last three years.

Impending competition has been responsible for much of the pricing increase in insulin products. Lantus (insulin glargine injection, Sanofi-Aventis) has seen significant price increases as its biosimilar Basaglar ((insulin glargine injection, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim) moved toward approval.

 And sometimes price increases are the result of genuine shortages. The FDA tightened quality requirements after 81 patients in the U.S. died from contaminated heparin traced to counterfeit raw materials in China. The price of heparin skyrocketed as supplies of approved product dwindled.

DEA goes to where the money is and the guns aren’t

dr-rassan-tarabienRassan M. Tarabein, MD

doctorsofcourage.org/index.php/2016/10/29/rassan-m-tarabein-md/

Rassan M. Tarabein, MD is the next good doctor illegally attacked by the US government. Dr. Tarabein is a neurologist who also does pain management at his independent clinic, Eastern Shore Neurology and Pain Center in Daphne, Alabama. His office and home were raided by the FBI and DEA yesterday. As a prior US Attorney once said, “They go to where the money is and the guns aren’t.”

As shown on my list of doctors being attacked, Dr. Tarabein fits the profile:

  1. Minority, of foreign background: Dr. Tarabein’s medical training was at the University of Damascus in Syria.
  2. Independent clinic: Dr. Tarabein is the self-employed owner of his clinic in Daphne.

Dr. Tarabein’s record as a physician is noteworthy.

  1. He is a lecturer and publisher of research with advanced medical and neurological training in Neurovascular Doppler/Ultrasound, Electromyography, VNG and invasive pain management.
  2. He was awarded the “National Leadership Award” and the “Businessman of the Year” in Alabama for 2001 and 2002 by the US congress.
  3. In 2007 he was featured on the cover page and was honored with an eight-page story in MD News, a state-wide physician magazine.
  4. In 2012, Dr Tarabein was awarded the “World Leading Physician”

So why is he being attacked? Money, promotions and government overreach into the medical profession “because they can”.

The first news article I read about Dr. Tarabein was from WKRG5. I won’t even go into that here. Their article was so propagandizing it was pitiful. Basically, if members of the jury saw their news or read their article Dr. Tarabein’s goose is cooked. But that’s the basic plan. It is my belief and theory that CBS is in cahoots with the US government in every affiliate station in the country to spread their propaganda. He should sue them for defamation of character and slander/libel because most of what they wrote is wrong, or at least misleading.

My response to them was:

Your news about Dr. Rassan Tarabein is misleading. I’ll bet you are a CBS affiliate. To correct your negative, propagandizing statements, consent orders with Boards of Medicine are not admissions to wrongdoing. They state that the physician neither admits nor denies the allegations. Usually the physician would deny them, as is the case with Dr. Tarabein, but legal expenses and having to go through a board review is not in the physician’s best interest at the time. We are told that we aren’t admitting to the allegations when we sign a consent order, but the Justice Department then treats them in court like they are admissions. That is wrong. But it is even more wrong for you, the media, to extend that wrong-doing into the realm of publicity. You should retract your comments about admission of those charges. You should also inform people that these attacks are simply DOJ and government agency job security tactics. Note also, that most of the attacks are on self-employed minorities, and are discrimination at its highest. In fact, why don’t you interview me for your next news cast? My guess is you won’t do any of the above, because you are part of the government propaganda machine. But this note will appear on my next post about Dr. Tarabein.

After writing that post, I checked. WKRG IS the CBS affiliate. Surprise, surprise. NOT!!

I did immediately receive a reply from Brad Gunther in which he referred me to the ALBME consent order. But he did not mention any interview to expose the truth behind these attacks. He basically stuck to their propagandizing story.

Alexa Knowles, reporter for FOX10 News, was less propagandizing. She reported on Fox’s 2006 interview with Dr. Tarabein after he was put on probation by the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners in 2004 following his consent order. This interview showed that Dr. Tarabein did NOT admit to the charges the Board made. He said, “There is a real mania among all medical boards in every single state. They are all in a real race, trying to show the public that they are the toughest boards in the whole nation.” “Physicians who are disciplined should be disciplined for legitimate reasons and not because of some personal conflict with the board.”

As a warning to other well-intentioned physicians, Dr. Tarabein was also a suboxone-certified clinic. This is the next hole the government has dug to attack physicians. They are extending the Suboxone prescribing practice by law, enticing more doctors to jump in. But then the DEA and US Attorneys will be waiting to charge you with criminal intent. WATCH OUT!!

PEOPLE, we have to stop this government overreach and illegal attacks on good doctors. Please read this and pass it on to all of your contacts. In every part of the country doctors are simply being indiscriminately targeted because they can’t fight back. We, the physicians and also the chronic pain patients now being discriminated against by new government laws, must take a stand. Understand that opiates are NOT the cause of drug abuse or addiction. You can learn what the real cause of abuse is by coming to my webinars or purchasing my DVDs. Then this information needs to be shared. We can’t let another innocent physician spend one day behind bars.

 

Major Pharmacy Chains feel that Pharmacists working 12 hrs without a break – IS SAFE ?

Would shorter pharmacist shifts reduce Rx errors?

http://drugtopics.modernmedicine.com/drug-topics/news/would-shorter-pharmacist-shifts-reduce-rx-errors?page=0,0

IS A TIRED PHARMACIST A DANGEROUS PHARMACIST ?

Rules being considered by the Minnesota Board of Pharmacy reflect a quandary facing pharmacists across the United States: How many hours should pharmacists be required to work?

The MBP has proposed that pharmacists not work more than 12 continuous hours a day—and and be provided a 30-minute break if they work more than six hours straight.

Courtesy/Shutterstock“Basically, there have been studies done in related professions that have showed the likelihood of errors goes up in high-pressure intense working conditions of healthcare, and we think that’s exactly what’s happening in pharmacies these days,” said Cody Wiberg, executive director of the Minnesota Board of Pharmacy, told the Mankato Free Press.

A spokesperson for the National Association of Community Pharmacists (NCPA) said the decision on how many hours a pharmacist should work should be left up to owners. “For example, what is required in a pharmacy that just opened and has limited staff, might be entirely different than what would be the case in a pharmacy that has been around for decades,” John Norton, NCPA’s director of public relations told Drug Topics.

The issue of how many hours pharmacists and pharmacy techs are required to work has long been a contentious issue in the profession. Even the most competent pharmacists can make script errors due to severe understaffing, inadequate number of competent techs, 12-hour shifts, and no meal breaks, Dennis Miller, RPh, wrote in this Drug Topics article.

CVS paid $7.4 million last year to more than 1,600 pharmacists throughout California who claimed the retail giant forced employees to work seven days in a row without paying overtime. A California pharmacist also filed a class-action lawsuit against Walmart last year, accusing the retailer of cheating pharmacists out of work breaks and overtime pay.

In Minnesota, CVS Health said it “strongly believes that a pharmacist should continue to manage their own work schedule and not rely on a Board rule to dictate work conditions,” a representative from the chain wrote. Other chains submitted similar statements opposing the Board setting a limit on the number of hours worked.

Small, independent pharmacists are also worried about the proposed rules, saying they could lose business. Typically, there is only on pharmacist on staff at small locations and the pharmacy would have to close when a pharmacist is not there, according to state rules.

However, a Hy-Vee Pharmacy Manager, Brian Cornelius, said he partially supports the proposal for his fellow pharmacists, even though he typically works a nine-hour day that includes a break. However, “I could also see it could be an inconvenience for patients if the pharmacy has to close,” he told Mankato Free Press.

Reinstate Vikki Patterson

Reinstate Vikki Patterson

https://www.change.org/p/cvs-pharmacy-reinstate-vikki-patterson?recruiter=619200179

 

 

Keep up with the cause, Support for Vikki on Facebook and @SupportForVikki on Twitter

http://www.redding.com/business/local/former-cvs-employee-said-she-was-fired-for-confronting-shoplifter-3f9f8bbf-82ad-2fb3-e053-0100007fb7-398268331.html

Vikki Patterson worked for CVS for 17 years, starting off when it was still Longs Drugs.

She had been a dedicated and faithful employee, working whenever needed without complaint. Vikki loved her employees, many of them were known as her “work kids” and went to her for all kinds of help. She loved her customers, became invested in their lives over the years and they in hers.

She worked in that store on Placer St in Redding, CA since that shopping center was built.

On Thursday October 13 2016 there were two suspicious customers in the store, one woman had filled her purse up with nearly 300 dollars worth of merchandise (and hundreds more in the cart that she didn’t have time to shove in her purse). She was swearing at Vikki and the other employee working and as the employee went to lock the door to call the police the shoplifter rushed the employee. Vikki ran to protect her “work kid” with her keys in one hand and cell phone in the other. She was forced outside with the suspect and her keys got caught in the woman’s hair. The suspect ended up punching Vikki multiple times, splitting her lip open and scratching her all over. She tried to steal her phone in the tussle while Vikki was calling 911.

Once Vikki was able to free her keys from the woman’s hair, she ran off and got into a car with the other woman she was with in the store.

Redding police spotted their vehicle while responding to CVS and pulled them over. They recovered all the merchandise as well as merchandise from other stores. The suspect was arrested for theft and battery.

CVS was notified of the situation and asked Vikki to write up her statement. The morning they received it, she was suspended without pay.
Today, they terminated her employment.

Vikki has been the caregiver for her husband Rob for years. Using all her vacation time to take him to/from doctors appointments and surgeries. This job was their main income, and her insurance was what saved Rob multiple times. Through a heart attack, triple bypass, seizures, strokes, dialysis, kidney and pancreas transplant, and countless other medical emergencies over the last 5 years.
Vikki and Rob are friends of many, they are caring people and involved in the community.

This whole situation sends the wrong message, it tells thieves that it’s ok to steal hundreds of dollars worth of merchandise and assault innocent people because it’s not them who will be punished.

 

Mom fights for custody after giving sick 3-year-old pot, stands by decision

Mom fights for custody after giving sick 3-year-old pot, stands by decision

http://abc7chicago.com/news/mom-fights-for-custody-after-giving-sick-3-year-old-pot-stands-by-decision/1575738/

Kelsey Osborne is heartbroken, as her daughter and son have been taken from their home, while Osborne fights a misdemeanor injury to child charge.

“She was begging me to save her that she was going to die,” said Osborne. “She said she loved her dad and Mike and me and her step mom, and she started going in to a seizure, her eyes locked to the side of her head, she couldn’t move.”

Osborne’s 3-year-old daughter Madyson was suffering from a seizure, something doctors have not found the cause of.

When Osborne was told to wait several hours before the next doctor’s appointment, she made a tough decision, one that has now gone viral.

“At about 11 o’ clock is when I decided with my knowledge of cannabis, I was going to give her just a tiny bit in a smoothie and butter and it helped her,” said Osborne. “Thirty minutes later, she stopped having seizures and she stopped hallucinating.”

At the doctor’s office, a battery of tests were run to figure out the cause, one of which came back positive for THC.

That’s when the Department of Health and Welfare were called as part of protocol and Child Protective Services got involved.

Currently, her two children, Madyson and Ryker are staying with their father, and Osborne is allowed supervised visitation.

“I was sitting there thinking, I know this will help her and I know I can get in trouble for it, but this is my daughter’s life,” said Osborne.

KMVT reports that nine states will have marijuana reform on their November 8th ballot, but Idaho is not one of them.

For this mother, she says something has to change.

“This is her home, I’ve always been her main caregiver to my children since day one, I feel like at least medicinal should be legalized in Idaho,” said Osborne.

Response to Letter from the Surgeon General

Response to Letter from the Surgeon General

http://www.prohealth.com/library/showarticle.cfm?libid=29588

In late August, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, MD wrote to 2.3 million physicians asking for their help in solving the opioid epidemic. By doing so Dr. Murthy joined a distinguished list of Surgeon Generals who have spoken out about critical public health issues. Some of America’s “top docs” who stand out in my mind are Luther Terry who in 1964 spoke about the dangers of tobacco; C. Everett Koop who in 1988 helped America understand the AIDS epidemic and quieted some of the panic that was surrounding it at that time; and David Satcher who in 2000 drew much needed attention to mental illness in the U.S. Let us hope that Dr. Murthy’s letter and his “Turn the Tide Campaign” will have the positive effect that those I’ve mentioned had on the health and well-being of our society.
 
Without question, physicians and others who prescribe opioids need better education about the safe use of opioids. They also need tools and resources to help them do a better job of treating pain. I completely agree with Dr. Murthy that substance use disorder/opioid addiction “is a chronic illness, not a moral failing.”  I believe the very same statement is true about chronic pain — another public health epidemic which is not mentioned in the Surgeon General’s letter other than to suggest that efforts by physicians to improve pain care have caused the opioid epidemic.
 
There are no data to substantiate this claim. Nor is there data to inform policy makers and other advocates about the rate of iatrogenic addiction, i.e., addiction that results from medication prescribed for legitimate medical reasons, although various rates are being pitched about irresponsibly in my opinion. Furthermore, I do not believe it is helpful to even suggest that efforts to improve pain care in the U.S. are the cause of the opioid epidemic.
 
We have research validating that a comprehensive chronic pain management model is called for; however, public and private insurers have been unwilling to fund this model because it is expensive on the front-end even though there are tremendous long term cost savings. This is understandable from the perspective of private payers who are subject to plan “members” rotating out of plans frequently but short-sighted and inexcusable for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid.
 
Just reducing opioid prescribing will not resolve the opioid epidemic. These efforts are already making it more difficult for those who struggle to live with chronic pain and rely on opioid therapy to receive the care they need. As reported by various sources, prescriptions for opioids have declined for each of the past three years. It is noteworthy that, at the same time, the rate of addiction has continued to rise.  I’m well aware that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director, Dr. Tom Frieden, has claimed that “prescription opiates are a gateway drug,” but again, we have no data to substantiate that claim.

It is a shame that as national leaders like Drs. Murthy, Frieden and Secretary of Health and Human Services Secretary Silvia Burwell continue their important efforts to address the opioid epidemic, they do not, at the same time, talk about the chronic pain epidemic that leads to disability, poverty and even death for tens of millions of Americans. Several years ago, PAINS leaders were encouraged by former Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and her leadership team to recognize the correlation between these two public health problems, i.e., chronic pain and opioid addiction, and to address them in a coordinated manner. We believe that she was absolutely right and have worked to develop relationships with substance use disorder advocates.
 
Let me be clear. PAINS is not advocating for the status quo. We know that opioid therapy alone is woefully inadequate for addressing pain. These medications are life-saving for some who live with chronic pain; there are also significant risks associated with them, and they must be used prudently. As one national leader in pain and addiction said recently, “Opioids are powerful medications; they are powerful in healing and powerful in harm.” Furthermore, it is well known that opioids do not work for many to whom they are prescribed and that the reduction of pain for those who do receive benefit from them is only about 30%. That benefit, however, may be the difference between life and death for those for whom pain consumes their every waking moment.
 
PAINS calls on Dr. Murthy to pledge to use the power of his office to educate the American public about chronic pain as a disease, the relationship between chronic pain and opioid addiction and the need for comprehensive chronic pain care. We also call on others at HHS to include moving from a biomedical chronic pain care model, i.e., opioid therapy, interventional procedures and surgeries, to a comprehensive chronic pain care approach as a major strategy in their efforts to address the opioid epidemic.
 
Comprehensive chronic pain care will improve the quality of life for millions of Americans, save billions of dollars each year, and reduce opioid prescribing.

After years of criticism, FDA tries to step up oversight of medical devices

After years of criticism, FDA tries to step up oversight of medical devices

A new site launched by the Food and Drug Administration tells people how to report wrongdoing in a controversial industry.

https://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/afer-years-of-criticism-fda-tries-to-step-up-oversight-of-medical-devices-102716.html

Makers of medical devices face such little scrutiny from the Food and Drug Administration that even a 2011 Institute of Medicine report, commissioned by none other than the Food and Drug Administration, described the agency’s medical device evaluation process as “fatally flawed.”

Even worse, the FDA has reportedly allowed device-makers to flout the few regulations that they are supposed to follow.  

Federal law requires pharmaceutical companies to report any injuries possibly related to medical devices within 30 days of learning about the so-called “adverse event.” But a Minneapolis Star-Tribune report, published last April, details how Medtronic, the world’s largest medical device company, waited years before telling the FDA about more than 1,000 adverse events related to one of its medical implants, Infuse.
 

The device, used in back surgery, is now the subject of thousands of personal injury complaints. “The FDA raised no issues about the late reporting and blacked out the total number of events from the three-sentence summary that became public,” the Star-Tribune report says. “That number was revealed just months ago, after the Star Tribune challenged an FDA decision to keep it secret.”

In a lengthy statement, the FDA tells ConsumerAffairs that it had granted an exemption to Medtronic and defended the company’s actions.

“FDA’s allowance of a summary report in certain circumstances, under the relevant regulation, is both appropriate and in the best interests of the public health,” the statement says in part. “Such summary reporting can create practical efficiencies by reducing data entry and FDA staff review time of information that is already well-understood about a particular device.” 

Medtronic did not respond to a ConsumerAffairs request for comment on this story.

Multiple companies

A follow-up report published this month details how the FDA similarly accepted late adverse event reports from multiple companies, not just Medtronic, without penalizing the companies.
 
“When patients have been horribly harmed by medical devices, they’ve notified the FDA. But nothing changes,” Dr. Diana Zuckerman, President of the Center for Health Research, tells ConsumerAffairs. “And, the FDA has not penalized companies that failed to report serious complications to the FDA, as required by law. The FDA’s track record could hardly be worse.”
 

Zuckerman’s complaints aren’t new. In 2014, three years after the FDA’s Institute of Medicine panel called its regulatory process for devices flawed, Zuckerman lead a separate study claiming that there is scant public research to back up the safety of many FDA-approved medical devices. The agency has repeatedly contested such critical findings.

Criticism invited

But recent actions by the FDA now suggest the agency may finally be taking some of the criticisms of its device regulation to heart. On October 21, the FDA launched a new online program to encourage anyone, from patients to doctors, to report misconduct by medical device-makers.

“The webpage is not in response to any recent news articles,” FDA spokesman Stephanie Caccomo tells ConsumerAffairs via email. “The webpage was developed to provide the public with more information on allegations of regulatory misconduct related to medical devices and provide clear instructions for reporting to the FDA.” For public health watchdogs like Zuckerman, whether the FDA’s new program will have teeth remains to be seen.

The FDA’s new site, “Reporting Allegations of Regulatory Misconduct,”  specifically singles out medical devices and instructs people to report anonymously if they wish to do so. “Anyone may file a complaint reporting an allegation of regulatory misconduct,” the FDA says, with instructions on how to submit complaints via email or hard mail.

The FDA’s website launch coincides with a separate agency crackdown on medical devices, this one relating to hospitals and their responbility in reporting device failures. The FDA on October 24 published an online report calling out 15 hospitals for failing to report adverse events related to medical devices in an appropriate manner or correct timeframe.

The hospitals include high-profile facilities with stellar reputations such as Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles.  “On June 25, Cedars-Sinai voluntarily reported to the FDA and the manufacturer that a surgical stapler device had malfunctioned during a surgical procedure on June 5, resulting in bleeding and requiring that sutures–the traditional method for surgical closer–be used instead,” the hospital says in a statement. But Cedars-Sinai only reported the incident through the FDA’s form for voluntary reporting. Instead, they should have reported the problem through the FDA’s form for mandatory reporting, or Form 3500A, because of the serious consequences such a device malfunction could have caused, the hospital says. 

Rather than punish the hospitals, the FDA explains that they want to work with them to develop better reporting procedures for device injuries. “FDA is looking to improve the way we work with hospitals to modernize and streamline data collection about medical devices,” wrote Dr. Jeffrey Shuren, the agency’s director for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, in a recent blog post.

For watchdogs like Zuckerman, the FDA’s new site soliciting allegations of abuse in the medical device industry is an encouraging step, but only on paper for now.  Though the new policy “sounds great,” she says, “will it make a difference? Will the FDA finally stop treating device companies like their favorite customers and remember that patients and consumers are their most important customers? …More importantly, will FDA finally decide that they will no longer allow device companies to ignore patient safety?”

 

 

We Can’t Let the Government Become Our Pain Doctors

black and white photo of man holding hands over eyes and noseWe Can’t Let the Government Become Our Pain Doctors

https://themighty.com/2016/10/chronic-pain-patients-response-to-dea-reduction-of-opioids/

The U.S. government has decided to limit the production of prescription opioids by 25 percent next year and many chronic pain patients are in a panic. The government and the Drug Enforcement Administration seem to have lost all common sense and are punishing pain patients for crimes they haven’t committed. They haven’t started a war on opioids, I believe they have made a decision and are manipulating statistics in order to back up their ridiculous decision.

Overdoses as a result of heroin and fentanyl use have increased over the past few years and the government’s knee-jerk reaction is to limit the amount of pain medications manufactured. Does that seem logical to anyone?

This is a hot topic in all of my chronic pain and fibromyalgia groups and the biggest response I see is, “We take our pain medication because we have pain. We don’t feel high, we feel normal when we take our meds!”

But I’m also concerned about what might happen if people’s pain meds are stripped. When the crackdown on Florida pain clinics happened in 2011, heroin deaths rose by 39 percent.

So what are we supposed to do? For many people, yoga and physical therapy do little to nothing for chronic pain, but I’m afraid soon that will be our only option. The government is being reckless in its law-making. Just as people with other conditions need their medication, pain patients need and deserve treatment. The DEA refuses to reschedule marijuana which has multiple medical uses and there are no documented deaths from overdose. The DEA is also still deciding whether or not to schedule and effectively ban kratom, another natural plant that is used to treat chronic pain. If we had access to options like these, I believe there would be fewer pain med prescriptions being written and even fewer deaths.

The government does not acknowledge that there is a difference between addiction and dependence. I openly and honestly depend on my pain medication. Without it I can’t work or perform normal functions around the house or go for walks with my children. Am I addicted? Absolutely not. I take my medication exactly as my doctor prescribes it and take no illegal drugs. But the government is positioned to take away my quality of life and I am scared. We are all scared and have no voice. We have no say in the matter. It’s the government’s way or the highway. It’s like the government is shrugging off all the downsides of limiting opioid use and saying, “Yeah, but at least there are 25 percent less opioid prescriptions out there!”

This is happening and the government is bulldozing the chronic pain community. They have created a culture of fear and now many doctors are too afraid to treat their patients and patients are too afraid to speak up for themselves. If we speak too loudly we may be labeled a pill seeker and an addict. The government is not my doctor and my medication should be a decision between me and my own doctor. I will not stay silent in the fight for my quality of life and neither should you.

We want to hear your story. Become a Mighty contributor here.

 

FDA proposes to withdraw approval of two generic versions of Concerta

Methylphenidate Hydrochloride Extended Release Tablets (generic Concerta) made by Mallinckrodt and Kudco

http://www.fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/ucm422568.htm

The FDA is proposing to withdraw approval of two generic versions of Concerta (methylphenidate hydrochloride) extended-release (ER) capsules, used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.  Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals and UCB/Kremers Urban (formerly Kudco) the companies that make the generic products, have failed to demonstrate that their products provide the same therapeutic effect as (are bioequivalent to) the brand-name drug they reference. 

This action is related to steps the FDA took in November 2014.  At that time, the FDA announced that, based on an analysis of data, it had concerns that the Mallinckrodt and Kudco (now UCB/Kremers Urban) products may not produce the same therapeutic effects as Concerta.  At that time, the FDA requested that Mallinckrodt and Kudco either (1) voluntarily withdraw their products from the market and request that FDA withdraw approval of their product’s Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) or (2) within six months, provide data to confirm that their products are bioequivalent to Concerta consistent with the revised draft guidance for industry for bioequivalence testing for these products.

At that time, the FDA changed the Orange Book therapeutic equivalence code for these two products  from AB (indicating therapeutic equivalence) to BX (data are insufficient to determine therapeutic equivalence).

Neither Mallinckrodt nor UCB/Kremers Urban has voluntarily withdrawn its product from the market, and neither has provided data confirming its product’s bioequivalence consistent with the revised recommendations.  Accordingly, the FDA is proposing to withdraw approval of the products’ ANDAs and is announcing an opportunity for the firms to request a hearing on the proposal.  As part of this process, the FDA is publishing Notices of Opportunity for Hearing (NOOHs) on its Proposals to Withdraw Marketing Approval in the Federal Register. If approval of these ANDAs is withdrawn by the FDA, the products will no longer be able to be marketed in the U.S.

Each NOOH explains that the firm may request a hearing to show why approval of their ANDA should not be withdrawn and has the opportunity to raise, for administrative determination, all issues relating to the legal status of the drug products covered by these applications. Each firm must respond in writing, within 30 days, to request a hearing. If the firm fails to do so, the opportunity for a hearing will be waived.

During the course of this process, the FDA will update the related Mallinckrodt and UCB/Kremers Urban dockets as new information becomes available.

The Mallinckrodt UCB/Kremers Urban products are still approved and can be prescribed, but they are not recommended as automatically substitutable for Concerta.  Janssen manufactures an authorized generic of Concerta, which is marketed by Actavis under a licensing agreement. The Actavis product is not impacted by this announcement.

If you or your health care professional are concerned that a methylphenidate hydrochloride ER product you are taking is not providing the desired effect, and you do not know the manufacturer, contact the pharmacy where the prescription was filled to verify the product’s manufacturer. If you, or those under your care, are taking the Mallinckrodt or Kudco products and have concerns about lack of desired effect during the dosing period, contact the prescribing health care provider to discuss whether a different drug product would be more appropriate.


[11-13-2014] FDA concerns about therapeutic equivalence with two generic versions of Concerta tablets (methylphenidate hydrochloride extended-release)

Based on an analysis of data, FDA has concerns about whether or not two approved generic versions of Concerta tablets (methylphenidate hydrochloride extended-release tablets), used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults and children, are therapeutically equivalent to the brand-name drug. The two approved generic versions of Concerta are manufactured by Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals and Kudco Ireland Ltd. 

FDA has not identified any serious safety concerns with these two generic products.  Patients should not make changes to their treatment except in consultation with their health care professional.

If you or your health care professional are concerned the drug product is not providing the desired effect and you do not know the manufacturer, contact the pharmacy where the prescription was filled to verify the product’s manufacturer.  If you, or those under your care, are taking the Mallinckrodt or Kudco products and have concerns about lack of desired effect during the dosing period, contact the prescribing health care provider to discuss whether or not a different drug product would be more appropriate.

FDA’s Scientific Evaluation of Generic Concerta Products

An analysis of adverse event reports, an internal FDA re-examination of previously submitted data, and FDA laboratory tests of products manufactured by Mallinckrodt and Kudco have raised concerns that the products may not produce the same therapeutic benefits for some patients as the brand-name product, Concerta, manufactured by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  Janssen also manufactures an authorized Concerta generic, which is marketed by Actavis under a licensing agreement and is identical to Janssen’s Concerta.  FDA included the authorized generic in its analysis and found it to be bioequivalent to, and substitutable for, Concerta.  Apart from the Mallinckrodt, Kudco, and Actavis products, there are no other generics for Concerta.

Methylphenidate hydrochloride extended-release products approved as generics for Concerta are intended to release the drug in the body over a period of 10 to 12 hours. This should allow for a single-dose product that is consistent with the effect of a three times per day dose of immediate-release methylphenidate hydrochloride.

In some individuals, the Mallinckrodt and Kudco products may deliver drug in the body at a slower rate during the 7- to 12-hour range. The diminished release rate may result in patients not having the desired effect.
   

As a result, the FDA has changed the therapeutic equivalence (TE) rating for the Mallinckrodt and Kudco products from AB to BX. This means the Mallinckrodt and Kudco products are still approved and can be prescribed, but are no longer recommended as automatically substitutable at the pharmacy (or by a pharmacist) for Concerta. 

Consequently, FDA has revised its draft guidance for industry for bioequivalence testing for methylphenidate hydrochloride extended-release tablets (Concerta). FDA has asked that within six months, Mallinckrodt and Kudco confirm the bioequivalence of their products using the revised bioequivalence standards, or voluntarily withdraw their products from the market.

FDA will continue to evaluate its testing and approval standards and bioequivalence guidances for other generic methylphenidate hydrochloride extended-release products and revise as needed.