Properly prescribed opiates did not cause the opiate epidemic

Policy analyst: Drug overcharging debate may be more about money than patients

Policy analyst: Drug overcharging debate may be more about money than patients

http://louisianarecord.com/stories/511060249-policy-analyst-drug-overcharging-debate-may-be-more-about-money-than-patients

NEW ORLEANS – Allegations of prescription-cost overcharging by pharmacy benefit managers and health-insurance companies have spawned at least 10 new lawsuits since early October, according to www.bna.com.

The lawsuits allege that benefit managers OptumRx and Humana Pharmacy Solutions Inc. have worked in concert with insurers including Cigna, UnitedHealth and Humana to overcharge customers by employing a “clawback” of the difference of a drug’s cost and the individual customer’s co-payment amount.

 

The plaintiffs also claim that these alleged overcharging schemes are being hidden from patients by the benefit managers, insurers and pharmacies.

“Discussion of how to claw back part of the copays seems more about lawyers trying to sue and settle for a big payday than actual patients who are harmed,” Devon Herrick, senior fellow for the National Center for Policy Analysis, told the Louisiana Record.

Many of the recent lawsuits have been filed in response to an investigation conducted by New Orleans television station Fox 8 into prescription-drug costs. The station said the investigation revealed that some insured patients would pay less for the prescription drugs in question if they had no prescription coverage at all.

Herrick said if patients are worried about whether their copays are more than the negotiated price of the drug in question, they can ask their pharmacists about the cash price or the insurance price, or do their own research on comparable prices.

“It doesn’t take too much effort on the part of a patient to find out that Wal-Mart’s $4 30-day prescriptions (or $10 90-day prescriptions) are sometimes less expensive than a $10 or $20 co-pay on their drug plans,” he said.

Herrick said the “cash” price of medical services is often less than the insurers’ negotiated price of medical procedures, and, occasionally, even drug copays are slightly more than the negotiated price. Reasons for these price differences, he said, include whether someone has met their deductible or not and whether the pharmacy, clinic or physician is competing on price.

“Ultimately, I believe it should be up to the health-plan sponsor and their agents to design benefits,” Herrick said.

According to Herrick, PBMs and health plans, including both insurers and employer plans, establish policy about formularies, copays and other aspects of a drug plan.

Herrick said industry data show that nearly one-quarter of prescriptions have no copay, about one-third have a copay of $5 or less, and nearly 75 percent have copays of $10 or less.

“Tiered copays are used by health plans and drug plans to create incentives to steer enrollees to the appropriate drug, which is usually a generic,” Herrick said. “On the individual level, this sounds like small potatoes. A generic may cost the insurers $2 less than the copay; a brand-name drug may cost the insurers $200 more than the copay.”

“Patients should not have to pay more than a network drugstore’s submitted charges to the health plan,” the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association told the Louisiana Record in a statement.

The association said PBMs are projected to save Louisiana’s employers, unions, government programs and consumers $9.5 billion on drug benefit costs over the next decade.

Merry Christmas

merryxmasgif

Former DEA Spokesperson: Marijuana is ‘Cash Cow’ and ‘We Will Never Give Up’

Former DEA Spokesperson: Marijuana is ‘Cash Cow’ and ‘We Will Never Give Up’Former DEA Spokesperson: Marijuana is ‘Cash Cow’ and ‘We Will Never Give Up’

https://www.ganjapreneur.com/former-dea-spokesperson-marijuana-is-cash-cow-and-we-will-never-give-up/

Twelve years ago, former DEA propagandist Belita Nelson quit her job after spending six years (1998-2004) as an international media representative for the anti-drugs agency. Since leaving the DEA, Nelson has become an advocate for cannabis reform and the expanding of research into marijuana treatments.

Nelson — who, during her time there, eventually became the DEA’s chief propagandist — told a crowd at the Marijuana for Medical Professionals Conference in Denver, Colorado last month that the DEA’s war on cannabis is exactly the corrupt, money-grubbing scheme that most believe it to be.

“Marijuana is safe, we know it is safe. It’s our cash cow and we will never give up,” she said, according to Angela Bacca’s report for Illegally Healed.

Ultimately, Nelson quit her job in 2004 due to a fundamental disagreement with the agency over its illogical and hardball stance against the cannabis plant. She had been a firsthand witness to marijuana helping a friend struggle through side-effects from chemotherapy. Finally, when she learned that cannabis was also effective in breaking addicts off of serious opiate addictions, Nelson resigned.

“[When they hired me] they forgot to get me to sign a confidentiality agreement — and boy did I know the dirt. They called me in and said ‘name your price, $10,000 a month? $20,000? What do you want Belita?’” she said during her presentation in Denver.

But instead of cooperating, Nelson stormed from the office screaming, “You know this is safe and you are keeping it from people who are sick! I am not taking your money and you better worry about what I am going to say.”

This is certainly not the first time that Nelson has spoken publicly about the DEA’s stance on cannabis in the years since she left — but, in light of the incoming administration (including particularly disappointing prospects for the U.S. Attorney General position), hers are the type of stories that may make the ultimate difference in the months and years ahead.

“…If you think the DEA are the good guys, they are not,” she said. “They are really not. We are talking corruption on steroids.”

 

Why do I even bother … STRIKE THREE ?

A year or so ago another chronic painer and myself tried to start of non-profit to accumulate a “legal war chest” to fund legal challenges to denial of care of chronic pain pts. Our goal was to get about 0.1% of the chronic pain community to contribute the cost of a fast food meal ($5 – $7.50) ONE TIME.. reaching that goal would have generated millions of dollars to fund legal actions… after abt 30 days.. the fund had a total of abt $600 that had been contributed by a couple of dozen people .. including two people that contributed $100 each.  In 30 days we had not even accumulated enough to pay for the legal cost of creating a non-profit… donations were refunded and the project ABANDONED…

Prior to the recent national election where 435 Representatives in the House and 34 Senators were up for re-election… I repeatedly pushed the concept to “VOTE THE BUMS OUT”.. and abt 98% of the incumbents got re-elected… so the vast majority of the  chronic pain community either didn’t vote.. or voted for the incumbent… ANOTHER FAILED PROJECT….

A couple of weeks ago.. I created a concept that would take some participation of those in the chronic pain community to create a list on Twitter to be able to send tweets to all of Congress and the media with just sending out a single tweet… I asked for help creating the lists… less than a HANDFUL of chronic painers came forward with a interest in moving forward with the project.  ANOTHER PROJECT THAT IS GOING TO BE DESTINED TO FAIL ?

If those in the chronic pain community does not get the attention of those who are passing laws… reinterpreting the existing laws.. that are going to continue to adversely effect those in the chronic pain community… the downhill path of pain care in this country is not going to change.

The bureaucracy is starting to acknowledge that addiction is a mental health disease, but as of yet.. they have not acknowledged that the prescribing opiates to treat pain… will not cause a person to develop the MENTAL HEALTH DISEASE of ADDICTION..

The prescribing of legal opiates peaked in 2012 and has been declining every since… all the while the number of OD’s from illegal Heroin, Fentanyl and other illegal substances have DRAMATICALLY INCREASED.

If those in the chronic pain community wants things to change.. then collectively they are going to have to get their ass in gear… there is no handful of advocates that are going to change the current course of where things are going in regards to how/when chronic pain pts are treated.

Over the last 5 yrs I have seen chronic painers and others who have tried to step up to the plate to advocate for better treatment of those with chronic pain.. for them to shortly realize that they were a solo voice or just one of a few vocal advocates and they seemingly “disappeared” from being an advocate.

There is suppose to be 100 + million chronic painers… those within the bureaucracy are not going to change their thoughts about treating chronic pain… when they only hear from a few hundred or less about the denial and abuse of chronic painers that is going on and that they are creating..

Look at it from their perspective.. if there are 100 million chronic painers and they are not hear much “noise” from that group of people.. there can’t be much of a problem to those people… if they are not SPEAKING UP.

Sticker shock at the pharmacy? There’s more than meets the eye: Antonio Ciaccia (Opinion)

Sticker shock at the pharmacy? There’s more than meets the eye: Antonio Ciaccia (Opinion)

http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2016/12/sticker_shock_at_the_pharmacy.html

Guest columnist Antonio Ciaccia is director of Government & Public Affairs for the Ohio Pharmacists Association.

There’s much debate about drug prices. Who pays and how much is complicated. Manufacturers get blamed (sometimes rightly) for high prices, and pharmacists face sick, angry patients whose prescriptions cost too much. Most of the time, there is an invisible third-party between the pharmacist and the patient. It’s time to look at the multi-billion dollar industry in the middle of nearly every prescription drug transaction.

Insurance companies use pharmacy benefit managers – PBMs – to handle the prescription drug part of their plans.  The PBM tells the drug manufacturer it will provide insurance coverage in return for a lower price.  A few PBMs represent millions of patients which can be leveraged to demand greater rebates from manufacturers. Insurers like this because they hopefully can get rebates from the PBM when covering your prescriptions.

Your pharmacy actually purchases the drugs. Since the pharmacy paid for the medication, you’d think the pharmacy would set the copay. Wrong. That’s dictated by the PBM.

When you take a prescription to the pharmacy, it takes time to fill the order. One reason is that your pharmacy contacts the PBM to see if your prescription is covered, and how much copay you’ll be responsible for. The pharmacy generally expects to recoup what it paid for the medication, plus a dispensing fee, covering the cost of employing pharmacy staff, the computer systems, and other pharmacy expenses.  

Here’s an example of how the math works. The pharmacy buys your prescription drug for $50 and your copay is $10. The pharmacy needs to recoup $40 from the PBM, plus a little more for overhead. Ohio pharmacists are finding that in many instances, $40 never arrives. While that doesn’t happen on every prescription, it’s increasingly common for PBMs to under-reimburse the pharmacy. This is one reason Ohio lost more than half of its independent pharmacies in the last 20 years.

Your local pharmacy isn’t the only one getting stiffed by PBMs. Patients are too. They just don’t know it, and the pharmacist is forbidden to tell them.

Let the numbers explain again. Your pharmacy buys the drug for $50, but this time the PBM tells them to charge you a $70 copay. Your pharmacist is obligated to charge you whatever the PBM says.   Where does that extra $20 go? The PBM performs a “claw-back,” collecting the overcharge from the pharmacy. Under PBM claw-back schemes, it’s not a copay – it’s a “you-pay.” The pharmacy got $50 to cover their acquisition cost for the drug (but nothing to cover operating expenses), your insurance paid nothing toward the prescription, and the PBM got the extra $20. The patient is stuck paying more than what the cost of the drug would have been if they hadn’t used insurance at all.

A recent story in The Wall Street Journal explains how PBMs’ pressure for greater rebates from drug makers may play a role in driving drug price increases, which in turn force hikes in copays and premiums. These business practices put PBM profits ahead of patients. And perhaps the most unsavory part is that many PBMs place pharmacies under a contractual gag order that prohibits the pharmacist from saying anything to the patient or plan sponsor about the true drug costs. Reuters reports that a lawsuit accuses UnitedHealth Group Inc., the nation’s largest insurer, for allegedly charging copays for medicines that were higher than negotiated costs, and keeping the difference.

Louisiana law now allows pharmacists to work with consumers to get them the best price, regardless what the PBM says. That’s a start, but it’s only one state, and it doesn’t prohibit all claw-backs. Those serious about controlling the costs of health care should get serious about pulling back the curtain on secret PBM tactics that raise prices and do nothing to enhance patient care.

Have something to say about this topic? Use the comments to share your thoughts, and stay informed when readers reply to your comments by using the Notification Settings (in blue) just below.

Marine Kicked Out of #Walgreens Because of Service Dog

https://youtu.be/HD_YJ8wdQPc

Marine Kicked Out of Walgreens Because of Service Dog

http://kogo.iheart.com/onair/morning-news-55380/marine-kicked-out-of-walgreens-because-15416361/

Not a very Merry Christmas for a Marine in Texas. He was asked to leave a Walgreens in Mesquite because he brought his dog in with him. Cris Goodson suffers from PTSD and his dog is registered as a service dog, but apparently the manager of the store didn’t understand ADA rules and wanted Goodson and his dog out of th store.

Walgreens says it’s investigating the matter. Has this ever happened to you or a loved one?

 

who believes that we DON’T have a epidemic of mental illness ?

The Worst Biopharma CEOs of 2016 Are …

The Worst Biopharma CEOs of 2016 Are …

https://www.thestreet.com/story/13924750/3/the-worst-biopharma-ceos-of-2016-are.html

Once upon a time, tobacco companies funded a public relations campaign to convince Americans that smoking cigarettes was good for their health. Today, a similar spin job is underway to portray pharmacy benefit managers like Express Scripts (the largest PBM in the country) as the good actors in the fight over drug prices.

 

Wentworth, the CEO of Express Scripts, and his sidekick, Chief Medical Officer Steve Miller, go to work every day to prevent consumers from being fleeced by evil, price-gouging drug companies.

 

It’s a compelling story well told. Too bad it’s not true.

 

In their middleman role representing insurers and employers, PBMs like Express Scripts negotiate lower prices largely by demanding rebates — discounts off the list price of a drug — from manufacturers. If a drug company refuses, Express Scripts removes their products from its formulary. The drug companies comply because they can’t afford to be frozen out from the millions of consumers Express Scripts represents.

 

What happens to that rebate?

 

Express Scripts pockets a big chunk of the money as profit. How much? No one really knows, because Express Scripts demands secrecy in its dealings with drugmakers over pricing and rebates. That’s on purpose, of course, lest people discover that higher rebates demanded by PBMs can contribute to higher, not lower, drug prices.

 

When a mobster demands and receives protection money from a local business owner, it’s extortion. When a PBM demands and receives a rebate from a drug manufacturer, it’s perfectly legal and hailed as a victory against rising drug costs.

 

Only in America!

Chronic Pain Patient Abandoned by Doctor Dies

Chronic Pain Patient Abandoned by Doctor Dies

www.painnewsnetwork.org/stories/2016/12/22/chronic-pain-patient-abandoned-by-doctor-dies

This will be the first Christmas that Tammi Hale spends without her husband Doug in over 30 years.

The 53-year old Vermont man, who suffered chronic pain from interstitial cystitis, committed suicide in October after his doctor abruptly cut him off from opioid pain medication.

“His primary care provider kept trying to wean him off his opioid therapy, which worked at higher doses,” says Tammi. “My husband ran out (of medication) early a few times, so the doctor cut him off completely one day. Six weeks later he took his life as no medical establishment would treat his chronic pain.”

We’re telling Doug Hale’s story, as we have those of other pain patients who’ve committed suicide, because their deaths have been ignored or lost in the public debate over the nation’s so-called opioid epidemic.  Patients who were safely taking high doses of opioids for years are suddenly being cutoff or weaned to lower doses. Some are being abandoned by their doctors.

“I believe it will get worse with time. The docs are simply more interested in not risking their licenses than in treating chronic pain,” Tammi wrote to Pain News Network in a series of emails about her husband’s death.

Depression and suicidal thoughts are common for many people living with chronic pain and illness. According to a recent survey of over a thousand pain patients, nearly half have contemplated suicide.

DOUG HALE

DOUG HALE

But the problem appears to have grown worse as physicians comply with the “voluntary” prescribing guidelines released in March by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which have been adopted as law in several states. Many doctors now fear prosecution and losing their medical licenses if they overprescribe opioids. Some have chosen not to prescribe them at all.

While federal and state authorities track the number of drug overdose deaths, no one seems to be following the number of patients who are dying by suicide or from cascading medical problems caused by untreated chronic pain. Some in the pain community call this “passive genocide.” Tammi Hale compares it to the Holocaust.

“The Nazis eliminated the sick and the weak first, right? Makes you wonder,” she says. “I realize my comments are harsh, but I believe the public needs to be aware of the dangers any one of us could be facing with this silent epidemic.”  

Doctor Insisted on Weaning

Doug Hale began facing a life with intractable chronic pain in 1999, after a surgery left him with interstitial cystitis, a painful inflammation of the bladder. According to his wife, Doug tried physical therapy, antidepressants, epidurals, nerve blocks, TENS, cognitive behavioral therapy, and several different medications before finally turning to opioids for pain relief. High doses of methadone and oxycodone for breakthrough pain were found to be effective.

But a few years ago, Doug’s primary care provider (PCP) started urging him to wean to a lower dose.

“The PCP insisted on weaning. Although Doug clearly had documented malabsorption issues, the PCP persisted on weaning. The pressure to wean was unbelievable,” says Tammi.

“It came to a head in May of 2016. The PCP gave Doug one month to wean completely from 120mg/day of methadone and 20 mg/day of oxy. We knew this was impossible.”

Tammi says Doug checked himself into a 7 day detox program, where he was weaned to 40 mg of methadone a day. The doctor agreed to prescribe that amount, but it was not enough to relieve Doug’s pain. He started taking extra doses. 

“He ran out a week early in late August. The PCP abandoned Doug, stating ‘I’m not going to risk my license for you. The methadone clinic can deal with you.’” 

But the methadone clinic refused to treat Doug because they saw him as a chronic pain patient, not as an addict. “Had he turned to street drugs they could have treated him, but because he didn’t break the rules they couldn’t help,” Tammi explained.

Doug tried to detox at home, which Tammi calls a “brutal” experience. On October 10th, after being turned down by other healthcare providers, Doug went to his former doctor one last time to beg for help and was refused. The doctor said again that he didn’t want to risk his license.

“Doug left the office still thrashing in pain and despondent,” Tammi recalls. “The next day, my dear, sweet thoughtful husband of 32 years; a father, son, brother, uncle, and friend, well loved by many, dragged a chair to a remote spot in our back yard. A spot we could not see from the house, the road, or by the neighbors. 

“He shot himself in the head to escape his pain. He made sure we could still live in our home and not be plagued by gruesome memories. I just wish the medical establishment had an ounce of the compassion that he did.” 

“Can’t take the chronic pain anymore. No one except my wife has helped me. The doctors are mostly puppets trying to lower expenses.”

— Doug Hale

“Can’t take the chronic pain anymore. No one except my wife has helped me,” Doug wrote in a suicide note. “The doctors are mostly puppets trying to lower expenses, and (do not accept) any responsibility. Besides people will die and doctors have seen it all. So why help me.”

Tammi says she has been comforted by an outpouring of love and support from her family, friends and community. Doug’s suicide surprised many.

“Doug did make vague references about suicide during the summer due to the desperation and pain. He was just such a tough guy, he survived so much that my reaction, and others after the fact, was no. Not Doug. He’s like the bionic man. Too much of a warrior to give up,” said Tammi.

“At his memorial so many people commented on what an inspiration he was to them. To graciously bear the path of pain and his never-give-up attitude made them reevaluate their own daily issues. I guess you could say his legacy was love and to never quit.”

Tammi consulted with a medical malpractice attorney after Doug’s death, who told her the chances of winning a lawsuit against the doctor were slim. The cost of legal action would have also been prohibitive, after so many years of dealing with Doug’s medical expenses.

Tammi and Doug may never get their day in court, but she is determined to share his story in the hope that patients, doctors and regulators learn from it.

“My promise to him was to share with others. He was thrown away like a piece of trash, but his life and the life of all humans is precious.  All patients deserve to be treated respectfully,” she wrote. “Hopefully some changes will come in time before the holocaust grows too much larger.”