
click on above graphic to pull up new policies and procedures
Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »
Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »
Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »
Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »
Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »
A year ago, Maine was one of the first states to set limits on opioid prescriptions. The goal in capping the dose of prescription painkillers a patient could get was to stem the flow of opioids that are fueling a nationwide epidemic of abuse.
Maine’s law, considered the toughest in the U.S., is largely viewed as a success. But it has also been controversial — particularly among chronic pain patients who are reluctant to lose the medicine they say helps them function.
Ed Hodgdon, who is retired and lives in southern Maine, was just that sort of patient — at least initially.
Name a surgery, and there’s a decent chance Hodgdon has had it.
“Knee replacement. Hip replacement. Elbows. I’ve got screws in my feet,” he says.
Dr. Don Medd, an internist in Westbrook, Maine, has found that working with patients to find alternatives to opioids has helped many taper their dose and reliance on the drugs — and reduce side effects.
Patti Wright/Maine Public Radio
Hodgdon has rheumatoid arthritis. And along with each surgery came an opioid prescription for pain. At first he got some relief from the drugs, but it didn’t last.
“It just numbed it for a while,” he says, “and then I needed more.”
Though Hogdon kept increasing the dose, the pain never went away.
“And then I found Dr. Medd. That’s my angel right there,” Hodgdon says, nodding toward Dr. Donald Medd, a general internist in Westbrook.
Medd had already started to taper high doses among patients like Hodgdon before Maine put a cap on new prescriptions for opioids last July. The new limit allows a maximum of 100 morphine milligram equivalents (the standard used to measure potency for all prescription opioids) for most patients per day — with certain exemptions for some cancer patients, those in hospice care, and some others. Patients with existing prescriptions were, by and large, given a year to meet the new restriction.
Medd was ahead of the game because he’d noticed that many of his patients on high doses of opioids grew increasingly angry about their pain as time wore on, and tended to demand ever more medication. At the same time, they were struggling to function in daily life because of the drugs’ side effects.
“You know, at some point the medications get in the way of some sort of recovery,” Medd says.
Opioids were affecting Hodgdon’s mood and his memory. Medd worked with him to cut the dose he was taking every day by two-thirds and helped him get in touch with a psychologist for further help. Though Hodgdon still lives with some pain, he says his life is infinitely better.
“I can remember things,” he says. “I get along better with people.”
Despite success stories like Hodgdon’s, Medd says he initially opposed Maine’s law. He didn’t want the legislature to interfere with medicine.
But now he thinks the law gave a necessary nudge to many doctors. Compared to a few years ago, Medd says, he and colleagues in his medical practice have cut the number of their chronic pain patients who are on opioids by almost half — from about 1,500 to 800.
In nearly all counties in the state, the number of prescriptions for painkillers is dropping. It’s a trend that Gordon Smith, executive vice president of the Maine Medical Association, says was underway even before the law took effect.
“We had the fourth largest drop in the country,” he says, citing a 21.5 percent reduction in opioid prescriptions from 2013 through 2016.
The data only include the first few months after Maine’s prescribing cap went into effect, Smith says; he expects the law will accelerate further reductions.
“Now having said that, it’s not been easy,” he says. “It’s been particularly difficult for patients,” he says — specifically for the 16,000 patients on high-dose opioids who were expected to taper to the 100 morphine milligram limit by July of this year.
Brian Rockett runs a wholesale lobster business in Maine, despite his chronic pain from past injuries. He needs high doses of opioids to be able to work, he says, and his doctor agrees.
Keith Shortall/Maine Public Radio
“I was about four times above that,” says Brian Rockett. He operates a wholesale business buying lobsters on the Maine coast. Rockett started taking opioids years ago to ease the pain of injuries from racing motorcycles and boats. When he tried to taper the dose, he says, he had unbearable pain. So, he filed a notice of intent to sue the state over its restrictions on how much he could be prescribed.
“I just knew that I was facing possibly losing my business,” he says.
Rockett wasn’t alone in his inability to taper his use of the drug, and Maine lawmakers — like Dr. Geoffrey Gratwick, a state senator who is also a rheumatologist — took notice.
“A certain group of people simply cannot come off [opioids],” Gratwick says.
He recently pushed through a change to Maine’s law that allows broader exemptions, so that people with incurable, chronic conditions can continue to take high doses.
It put the decision about that back in the hands of the doctor and patient, Gratwick says, “where it should be.”
Under the revised law, Rockett was able to increase his dose, and dropped his lawsuit.
Even though more patients could, potentially, seek exemptions, Maine’s law is seen by its advocates as an important step. Recent data from the federal Centers for Disease Control suggest that nationwide, despite an overall decrease in recent years, the number of opioids prescribed still triple what it was in 1999.
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »
Without thinking much about it, someone who overdoses on prescription opioids of heroin can just keep going right back to Medicaid for more easy access to the drug that nearly killed them the first time. The state just keeps paying for it.
Which is why, according to a new study, Medicaid recipients are three times more likely to overdose on opioids than people on private insurance.
Sure, it’s easy to dismiss the opioid crisis as a phenomenon peculiar to people at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder. But obviously, there are causes and mechanisms here, which is why the numbers are coming in as they are. It’s not just the supposed character flaws of those taking these opioids that is at work, it’s the drug dealer that accommodates them on the other side, which in this case, the state. Dependency on the state seems to be fuelling dependency on drugs as much as anything.
According to the Washington Free Beacon:
The study evaluated Medicaid claims in Pennsylvania from 2008 through 2013 for those individuals ages 12 to 64 who had experienced a prescription opioid or heroin overdose. There were 6,013 cases found—3,945 were individuals who overdosed on prescription opioids and 2,068 overdosed on heroin.
According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, individuals on Medicaid are three times more likely to have a risk of opioid overdose than those who are privately insured.
Fifty-nine percent of those who overdosed on opioids were given opioid prescriptions after they overdosed, and 39.7 percent of those who overdosed on heroin were given the same.
“Our findings signal a relatively weak health system response to a potentially life-threatening event,” said Julie Donahue, Ph.D., who authored the study. “However, they also point to opportunities for interventions that could prevent future overdoses in a particularly vulnerable population.”
Notice also that the states that have increased Medicaid expansion in the greatest amounts due to the Affordable Care Act are also the ones that are known to have the greatest problems with the opioid crisis, if one takes a look at this graph here:
This is not to say there aren’t other causes for the opioid crisis as well. President Obama’s open borders policy opened the floodgates for cartel imports of opiates for one. The pressures on the medical profession, in which doctors are pressed by addicts to prescribe opioids in unsafe amounts or else be hit with bad patient reviews is another. There also is the poverty and lack of opportunity that motivates many to want to take opioids. But there is little doubt the round-heeled way Medicaid prescribes in its runaway expense culture plays a role, too.
So much for the claim about the heartlessness of private insurance companies. At least its recipients are alive to tell about it. Things happen because there are incentives for them to happen. If a gift is freely given, you take it, as Milton Friedman once observed. And to paraphrase his student, Thomas Sowell, you can have all the opioid addiction you’d like to pay for.
Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »
Where do we go from here?
I started writing this column understanding it was going to be a grim read for a lot of people as there are opposite sides and opinions when it comes to opioid addiction and how to fight and treat it.
It is a tough subject because opioids ruin more than the lives it steals: it leaves behind wrecked loved ones, many who could only watch as the person they loved spiraled into addiction and eventually, for many, toward death.
With more than 900 deaths in Connecticut alone, it is a testament to the power of opioids and their ability to fool their victims with an embrace of euphoria before tightening around them like a python, leaving them gasping for the fix with no other place to run and no place to hide.
Never before in the United States has so many people cast caution to the wind with such reckless abandon.
Mental health experts, lawmakers and law enforcement have responded, setting up clinics, treatment, services, funding, and are pouring over other ideas and implementing new strategies to get more addicts to come forward.
But despite this, I find there is not a lot of plain English being spoken when it comes to fighting the crisis that has gripped the nation and is spreading desperation from small rural communities to burgeoning metropolises.
I don’t mean to bring doom and gloom but what’s worrisome to me is what nobody is talking about given the massive crisis this has become and the massive response it’s going to take to fix it: the success rate in kicking substance-abuse-related addiction is very low.
Substance abuse programs do get some people through the rushes but even at their high end, the 12 steps don’t seem to lead enough people walking across the finish line to sobriety.
And the grim reaper is no longer a surprise from the shadows but breathing on every needle and every snort.
According to the New York Times, nearly 60,000 people in the U.S. died of overdoses last year. Drug overdoses are now the number one “cause of death among Americans under 50,” with overdoses on a 19 percent climb from 2015 — and 2017 is expected to be worse.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ranks Connecticut the 5th-highest among 30 states in the rate of opioid-related emergency department visits and 7th-highest among 44 states for inpatient stays — both above the national rate.
Those are pretty troubling numbers for a state that is broke, cutting services and dealing with a large unskilled workforce.
Right now, it is estimated that more than two million people nationwide are dependent on opioids and another 95 million used prescription painkillers in the past year.
With millions needing treatment for opioid abuse, the dollars are being vacuumed out of local and state budgets and the U.S. wallet will have to be a lot more generous to keep up with the demand.
That leads to the stark reality of what is happening now and what lies ahead: revive, treat and maintain.
And the sheer cost of that is drawing red lines.
Some lawmakers in Ohio are making it clear to addicts in their districts that they’re are only willing to go so far to help. They have decided that the strain on their constituents and employees along with decimated budgets that have affected other services can’t continue.
Butler County Sheriff Richard Jones will not let his men carry naloxone, citing cost and safety. He said besides the fact that people “can become hostile and violent” after being revived, it is a wasted effort.
“All we’re doing is reviving them, we’re not curing them,” he told NBC News. “There’s no law that says police officers have to carry Narcan (naloxone) … Until there is, we’re not going to use it.”
And from the same county, Councilman Dan Picard wants a three-strikes penalty so EMS will not have to respond to an overdose victim who has required two previous interventions. He is also looking for a way to recoup costs, suggesting people who overdose should be forced to perform community service to make up for the cost of treatment.
Those lawmakers may not display the compassionate nature we Americans are used to hearing. And it is certainly not happening here in Connecticut where police carry naloxone and pharmacists are hitting the streets to “prescribe and dispense” the life-saving drug to people on the streets.
But for how long?
The shift in attitude from the Ohio lawmakers may be ugly and dangerous but it also may show what could lie ahead if addicts, public health officials and lawmakers don’t get a handle on this crisis.
I can be accused of taking a dystopian look at the situation but I don’t think so.
Opioids have worked their yellow haze over too many to think the crisis will just wind down in an orderly way as so much depends on those addicted — and their numbers are growing.
But there is room for optimism.
According to cleanslate.com, an informational website about addiction, it sticks by a 2001 study that shows up to 75 percent of addicted people will eventually find their way to sobriety on their own.
Well … OK, that sounds good, but how long does that take?
These are high tech, deadly drugs and if they can’t kick the habit and that python keeps tightening its grip — it leads me back to the first sentence in this column: where do we go from here?
James Walker is the Register’s senior editor. He can be reached at 203-680-9389 or jwalker@nhregister.com. Follow him on Twitter @thelieonroars
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »
South Portland-based Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield in Maine reported Wednesday that opioid prescriptions for its individual and employer-sponsored members dropped by 15% in the past year.
Anthem stated in its news release that the primary goal of the quantity limits was to prevent inadvertent addiction and opioid use disorder and to ensure clinically appropriate use consistent with Centers for Disease Control guidelines.
It added that these Maine initiatives contributed significantly to its parent company meeting a national goal to reduce opioids filled at the pharmacy by 30% compared to the opioid prescription peak in 2012.
“This misuse of opioids continues to be a serious issue here in Maine and we are committed to making a significant difference to our members,” said Dan Corcoran, president of Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield. “We believe these changes in pharmacy policy, in addition to a broad set of strategies addressing the opioid epidemic, will help prevent, deter and more effectively treat opioid use disorder among our members.”
Last year Maine experienced 376 overdose deaths, the majority of them from opioids.
The pharmacy policy changes are part of Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield’s holistic approach to prevention, deterrence and treatment to reduce the impact of this epidemic. To help ensure members have access to comprehensive evidence-based care, Anthem also is committed to helping its affiliated health plans double the number of members who receive behavioral health services as part of medication-assisted therapy, drug and talk therapy, for opioid use disorder by 2019.
Nationally about 5% of the 4.5 BILLION prescriptions filled annually are for opiates. Who believes that upwards of 30% of those prescriptions are NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY… Apparently Anthem/Blue Cross has established a 30% goal of opiate reduced prescribing will save them a “ton of money” that they can add to their bottom line… Their responsibility to cover medically necessary therapy – as required by the beneficiary’s policy/contract – is of little importance and their ability to practice with out a license is being CONDONED or IGNORED by all the 50 states’ medical licensing board.
Filed under: General Problems | 3 Comments »
The 47-page report includes numerous incidents of unsafe patient care due to short staffing of nurses: http://www.supportUPnurses.org/uploads/7/7/1/1/7711851/08.24.17_final_ado_report.pdf
• 111 reports of one or more IVs running dry or medicines being given late
• 12 reports of one or more patient falls in a shift
(including four in one day in one unit)
• 259 times one or more nurses went with no breaks, lunches, or were
mandated to work overtime, which can be dangerous to patients (up to 16
hour shifts)
“The report we are submitting to the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services today shows that over eight months, reports of unsafe patient care due to nurse short staffing were happening over and over and over again. This is Duke LifePoint’s response to the forms nurses submitted—if we don’t acknowledge the problem, it doesn’t exist,” said Tammy Sustarich, an ICU RN. “Nurses know there’s a problem with unsafe staffing at UPHS Marquette and we are prepared to fight until something is done about it.”
Duke LifePoint and Marquette nurses have been in contract negotiations since April 2017. The contract extension that was negotiated in late May lapsed on July 28 after management failed to address staffing concerns. The nurses are currently working without a contract.
“My life and the life of my patients right now is – what if? What if – today brings more patients than we can handle and things go south in a bad way? What if – today another nurse quits in disgust and we continue to do more with even less than we have now? Or, what if – today Duke LifePoint gets serious about providing safe patient care and puts patients before profits?” said Maradie Milkey, a Labor and Delivery RN in the Family Birth Center.
The nurses have repeatedly asked the management at UPHS Marquette to consider their proposals to address the unsafe staffing conditions. Management has responded by rejecting all of the nurses’ proposals twice. In addition to submitting the report, the nurses announced they will be taking a vote next week to authorize the UPHS Marquette RN Staff Council/MNA negotiating team to call a strike if they feel it is warranted.
“I am disappointed and frustrated that it has come to this,” said Scott Balko, president of the UPHS Marquette RN Staff Council/MNA. “We are seeing a crisis situation unfolding every day in our workplace and our patients are at risk. We have tried reporting it internally and have been ignored. Our patients come first. If it takes reporting UPHS Marquette to the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services to bring safer patient care to our community, then that’s what we’ll do. We can’t count on Duke LifePoint to prioritize safe patient care.”
A summary of the report can be found at supportUPnurses.org.
A request for a statement from UPHS-Marquette has been made by Local 3 News but has not yet been received.
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »
http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/3463348
Walk into any pharmacy or big box retail store and you’ll see hundreds of over-the-counter medications. As a consumer, it’s great to have choices. In some cases, however, the sheer variety of products is overwhelming. Which ones are best? More importantly, which ones are safe?
Because we live in a country with rigorous safety rules, most people don’t worry about whether a bottle of cold medication or cough syrup is potentially harmful. Unfortunately, sometimes unsafe products make it past quality control standards and onto store shelves.
In August 2017, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a widespread recall for several different brands of liquid drugs and dietary supplements due to a possible bacteria contamination risk. The recall is extensive — to find out if you have any of the affected drugs in your home, be sure to take a look at the FDA’s recall list.
What the Recall Says
The FDA is warning consumers not to use any “liquid drug or dietary supplement products” made by PharmaTech LLC. The company, which is based in Davie, Florida, labels its products under a variety of names, including Rugby Laboratories, Major Pharmaceuticals, and Leader Brands. The drug manufacturer makes products ranging from stool softeners and dietary supplements to vitamin D drops and medicines for infants and children.
PharmaTech products have been linked to a multistate breakout of an aggressive and potentially deadly bacteria. Currently, the FDA has not reported any deaths associated with the outbreak.
Federal authorities warn that products made by PharmaTech could contain a bacteria called Burkholderia cepacia (B. cepacia), which is known to cause serious respiratory infections. The bacteria are especially harmful to at-risk populations, including the elderly, chronically ill, and infants. B. Cepacia can also cause serious infections in people with lung illnesses, such as cystic fibrosis.
The FDA has instructed consumers who own any of the products covered in the recall to stop using them and to contact the pharmacy or store where they purchased the products to receive a full refund. It’s especially important for parents to take a close look at all drug labels they have in their home. Because newborn babies don’t have a fully developed immune system, they are particularly vulnerable to infections caused by B. cepacia and other bacteria.
Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer Discusses Drug Manufacturer Negligence
Philadelphia personal injury lawyer Rand Spear explains, “Consumers rely on medication to make them feel better. The last thing you expect when you purchase over-the-counter drugs is for the medication to make you worse — or possibly land you in the hospital with a life-threatening bacterial infection. If you have any medication produced by PharmaTech in your home, be sure to check it against the FDA’s list of affected drugs covered by the B. cepacia recall.”
Contact a Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer Today
If you or a loved one has been injured by a defective or contaminated drug or dietary supplement, protect your rights by speaking to an experienced personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. Call Philadelphia and New Jersey personal injury lawyer Rand Spear today at 877-GET-RAND.
Sources:
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »