CDC: Updated Influenza Immunization Recommendations for 2017-2018

CDC: Updated Influenza Immunization Recommendations for 2017-2018

It is recommended that flu shots should be given by the end of Oct because it takes a couple of weeks for full immunity to build up.  Conversely, there is new evidence that getting a flu shot “early” (Aug-Sept) that the effectiveness of the flu vaccine may have “faded enough” by the time of the peak flu season that the pt may be at risk of catching the flu.  Especially those pts with compromised immune systems (FM, RA, MS, etc) might be advised to get their flu shots in the last two weeks of Oct each year.

http://www.empr.com/news/flu-season-vaccine-quadrivalent-trivalent-acip/article/684558/

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has issued new guidelines for the prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines for the 2017–2018 season. 

For the 2017–2018 season, the following influenza vaccines will be available:

  • Trivalent influenza vaccine (A/Michigan/45/2015 (H1N1)pdm09–like virus, an A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 [H3N2]-like virus, and a B/Brisbane/60/2008–like virus [Victoria lineage])
  • Quadrivalent influenza virus (includes three viruses listed for Trivalent vaccine + additional B vaccine virus [B vaccine virus, a B/Phuket/3073/2013–like virus])
  • Recombinant influenza vaccine (both trivalent and quadrivalent)

Due to concerns about its effectiveness, live attenuated influenza vaccine (FluMist Quadrivalent; MedImmune) is NOT recommended for use during the 2017–2018 season. According to Penn State College of Medicine researchers, influenza vaccination rates for the 2016–2017 flu season among children decreased by 1.6% (compared to 2015–2016 rates) after this recommendation was made. “We worried that there was going to be a huge drop off in vaccination rates without the nasal spray available,” said study co-author Ben Fogel, assistant professor of pediatrics at Penn State College of Medicine and medical director of Penn State Pediatric Primary Care. “We saw a drop off but I would not call it huge, which is reassuring.”

In general, routine annual vaccination is recommended for all patients ≥6 months of age who have no contraindications. Flu vaccine should be offered to patients by the end of October, if possible.

Related Articles

The major updates for this upcoming flu season include the following:

  • A change in the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus component from the previous season
  • The availability of Afluria Quadrivalent (Seqirus), an inactivated influenza vaccine indicated for active immunization against influenza A subtype viruses and type B viruses for patients 18 years of age and older
  • The availability of Flublok Quadrivalent (Protein Sciences), a recombinant protein-based vaccine for active immunization against disease caused by influenza A virus subtypes and influenza B virus in patients 18 years of age and older
  • An expanded age range for FluLaval Quadrivalent (GlaxoSmithKline) to include use in children aged ≥6 months (previously approved in patients aged ≥3 years)
  • Pregnant women may receive any FDA-approved, recommended, age-appropriate influenza vaccine
  • Patients 5 years of age and older may now receive Afluria (Seqirus), a trivalent, inactivated “split virion” influenza vaccine
  • While still a licensed product, the ACIP does not recommend use of live attenuated influenza vaccine

The full report, which includes guidance for influenza vaccination of specific populations (ie, children, pregnant women, older patients, immunocompromised individuals), and situations (history of Guillain-Barré Syndrome, egg allergy) can be found here.

Congress Makes Progress in Destroying the Americans With Disabilities Act

Congress Makes Progress in Destroying the Americans With Disabilities Act

www.rewire.news/article/2017/09/11/congress-makes-progress-destroying-americans-disabilities-act/

From literally putting their bodies on the line to save the Affordable Care Act to contending with a presidential administration that has demonstrated complete disdain for them, people with disabilities are facing unprecedented times. Last week, things went from bad to worse for us: Congress took significant steps in its efforts to destroy the landmark Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).

As I have written previously for Rewire, Congress is considering the ADA Education and Reform Act of 2017 (HR 620), sponsored by Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX). If passed, this dangerous legislation would completely undermine the intent of the ADA and significantly harm the rights of people with disabilities.

Because of the ADA, businesses—such as restaurants, movie theaters, hospitals, hotels, and museums—must be fully accessible to people with disabilities. In addition, the ADA compels employers, as well as public and private entities including state and local governments, to provide reasonable accommodations to people with disabilities and prohibits discrimination based on disability.

Right now, if a disabled person faces an ADA violation, such as inaccessibility, at a business, they can file a complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) or file a lawsuit in court. Because there is no entity responsible for ensuring that businesses comply with the ADA, enforcement depends on people with disabilities to challenge violations.

Put briefly, if the ADA Education and Reform Act is passed, this will be a much more difficult process. Specifically, if HR 620 is passed, a person with a disability would be obligated to provide written notice to a business owner who has violated the ADA. The business owner would then have 60 days to even acknowledge that there is a problem and another 120 days to make progress toward correcting the violation. In other words, people with disabilities will have to wait 180 days to enforce their civil rights.

According to a letter to the House Judiciary Committee last week by 236 disability and civil rights organizations, “H.R. 620 was not written in consultation with representatives of the disability rights community and it would create barriers to the civil rights for persons with disabilities that do not exist in other civil rights laws.”

Despite this strong condemnation, however, the House Judiciary Committee held a markup hearing on Thursday where it voted HR 620 out of committee. The final vote was 15 to 9 along party lines; all of the amendments proposed by Democrats, including additional damages if a business fails to make progress after 120 days, were rejected. The ADA Education and Reform Act of 2017 will now move to a full House floor vote.

In response to this appalling vote, the National Disability Rights Network issued a statement on Friday: “More than 27 years after the passage of the ADA, the committee’s vote was not an attempt to reform or educate on the ADA, but a blatant attempt by Congress to say that it is ok to discriminate against people with disabilities by not making public accommodations accessible.”

Disability rights advocates were not the only ones to release scathing remarks in response to the vote. Ranking member Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA) issued a press release expressing his disappointment that read, “H.R. 620 undermines the goals of the ADA to create a more inclusive society and provide equal participation for all members of the community by removing incentives to comply with ADA requirements, placing the compliance burden on individuals with disabilities.”

Likewise, Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), a disabled veteran and wheelchair user, wrote on Facebook, “It’s hard to believe this legislation advanced in the House this week. 27 years after the Americans With Disabilities Act became the law of the land, the notion that businesses in this country need more time to provide people with disabilities access to their services is ridiculous and offensive.” Referencing the pro-ADA protest in 1990, she continued, “This vote is a disgrace to those who literally crawled up the steps of the United States Capitol so many years ago to secure the protections enshrined in the ADA as well as to all those who value liberty and justice for all.”

Other members of Congress, including Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), and Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA), issued similar statements condemning the House Judiciary Committee’s vote and committing to oppose passage of the bill in the Senate.

Of course, many business representatives, including the International Council of Shopping Centers, are celebrating the House Judiciary Committee’s vote.

Throughout the years, based on a false belief that the ADA is being abused via frivolous lawsuits, Congress has introduced a number of “notification bills”—which shift the burden of enforcement further onto people with disabilities—such as HR 620. But their passage has never seemed so likely as now. Individuals must join the efforts to stop this assault on the ADA by contacting their members of Congress, signing online petitions, and most importantly, joining the disability community as we continue to fight this dangerous legislation.

Considering that the U.S. president’s real-estate properties have violated the ADA on numerous occasions, the bill is certain to be signed into law if it crosses his desk. Today it is the ADA on the chopping block; tomorrow it may be another civil rights law.

 

Lady Gaga hospitalized for ‘severe pain’

Lady Gaga hospitalized for ‘severe pain’

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/09/14/lady-gaga-hospitalized-for-severe-pain.html

Lady Gaga cancelled her Rock In Rio concert in Brazil Thursday after announcing she was suffering from “severe physical pain.”

The 31-year-old made the announcement on Twitter.

It was later confirmed on her social media that the pop star was hospitalized and is being watched over by “the very best doctors.”

The singer revealed earlier this week she suffers from fibromyalgia, a chronic disorder that causes widespread muscle pain.

Back in 2013, Gaga was forced to cancel several tour dates to have surgery on her broken hip.

She opened up about that painful procedure in her new Netflix documentary “Gaga: Five Foot Two,” which premieres Sept. 22.

The territory that lost the most residents to drug overdoses in 2016 was Florida

Figures reveal another increase in overdose deaths: Rates were up more than 20% in the first months of 2017 – showing efforts to control the epidemic are failing

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4874540/Drug-overdose-deaths-20-2016.html

New CDC figures reveal another significant increase in drug overdose deaths – a bleak sign that efforts to control the epidemic are failing.

The number of Americans who died in 2016 and the first months of 2017 from a drug overdose hit 64,765, which is up more than 10,000 from the same figure from 2015.

Territories that had the steepest increases in overdose deaths were Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida, Maryland and North Dakota. And only nine states saw their rates decrease from 2015 to 2016. 

The figures are consistent with the grim findings of recent reports that reflect the seriousness of America’s opioid crisis, which President Trump has deemed a ‘national emergency’.

Experts are blaming the rise on a lack of education about opioids and inaccessible treatment options.

They are also warning that the crisis is likely going to get worse before it gets better because – no matter what measures states take now to decrease drug overdose death rates – the epidemic has already taken effect.

New CDC data have revealed that the rate of overdose deaths in the US rose more than 20 percent from 2015 to 2016 despite preventative measures to bring the rate down (Source: CDC)

The CDC’s new report confirms that drug overdose deaths now kill more Americans than fatal illnesses such as influenza and pneumonia – which, combined, kill about 57,000 people – suicide, which claims around 44,000 lives annually.

Other CDC data have shown that the overdose rate for teenagers, specifically, is growing for the first time since the 2000s.

The territory that lost the most residents to drug overdoses in 2016 was Florida, where 5,199 people died from them between February 2016 and February 2017.

But the territory that saw the largest increase in overdose deaths between 2016 and 2017 was the District of Columbia, which saw a 128.8 percent increase. 

However, states that saw increases like these are not necessarily doing anything wrong in their attempts to help residents who are hooked on opioids, according to Dr Cheryl Healton, Dean at NYU’s College of Global Public Health.

‘That has to do with how long they’ve had the epidemic,’ Dr Healton said.

And, conversely, ‘just because the rate went down doesn’t mean [a state is] doing things right’.

She explained that it takes time for an epidemic to run its course.

Regardless of the measures a state is taking to lower its overdose death rate, if a large number of its residents got hooked before it started taking these measures, it is likely that a large number of them will die.

This means that even if a state’s overdose death rate is going up, it could still be making a strong effort to control it.

And one reason for a state’s overdose death rate going down could have simply been low population, Dr Healton said.

The number of fentanyl overdose deaths in America’s largest cities rapidly increased between 2014 and 2016, as the synthetic opioid’s role in the drug crisis continues to grow

WHAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INCREASED RATES OF OVERDOSE DEATHS IN US CITIES? 

The rate of deaths in cities related to man-made narcotic fentanyl shot up 600 percent from 2014 to 2016, with the steepest increases seen in New York, Chicago, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and Cleveland.

Fentanyl can be 50 times stronger than heroin.

Experts have said that often times people who think they are purchasing heroin are actually purchasing fentanyl, which has contributed to the rise in fentanyl-related deaths.

Fentanyl is supplied to people in the US by online orders from China as well as drug trafficking from Mexico.

‘The supply lines for fentanyl and heroin are often essentially the same. Heroin traffickers who travel to the Southwest border to purchase heroin now also purchase fentanyl from the same Southwest border sources of supply,’ the DEA has said. 

The agency has also pointed out that the drug is wildly profitable for traffickers.

Traffickers can buy a kilogram of the drug in powder form from a Chinese supplier for a few thousand dollars.

From there, they can create from that one kilogram hundreds of thousands of pills and sell the counterfeit pills for millions of dollars.

 

Dr Healton said that the spike in deaths is, in part, a reflection of a lack of education.

‘We are doing absolutely nothing to educate the American people broadly. There needs to be mass communication,’ she said.

She added: ‘The education curve has not happened and it needs to happen.’

Dr Healton thinks that a full-fledged anti-opioid campaign needs to be initiated in the US.

Another factor that contributed to this rise is dangerous marketing tactics, she said.

Dr Healton explained that pharmaceutical companies that produce prescription painkillers such as OxyContin label opioids as non-addictive when the reality is that they are highly addictive.

This confusion about whether or not they are easy to get hooked on has led doctors to over-prescribe them because they think they are harmless.  

Dentists in particular are to blame because they prescribe painkillers routinely after patients undergo minor dental procedures, Dr Healton said.

She added that doctors do this even when less-harmful and less-addictive medications exist that could also do the trick, saying: ‘We’re not utilizing other methods. They should try something else first.’

The price of painkillers produced by pharmaceutical companies has also contributed to the problem.

Dr Healton explained that after a person gets hooked on opioids – which does not take long – the doctor who prescribed the drugs to them will usually sense this.

When they do, they will stop writing prescriptions for opioids for the addicted patient, which will in turn cause the person to seek out the medications to satisfy their cravings elsewhere.

This leaves them with two options: paying at least $50 per pill for the medications they have been taking or turning to illicit versions.

Dr Healton said: ‘Providers stop prescribing. The pricing of opioids has driven people to street heroin.’ She added that heroin is usually 10 percent of the cost of prescription drugs, so it is the more attractive option.

And recent reports confirm this: the CDC’s new figures come on the heels of an analysis that showed that the rate of deaths caused by synthetic opioid fentanyl in American cities grew more than 600 percent between 2014 and 2016. 

Above all people need to realize that, if they are hooked, help is available, Dr Healton said.

She explained: ‘The most important thing is availability of treatment alternatives. Treatment is effective.’

DEA spokeswoman: If these people have medical problems, they should seek medical help. The medical community is obligated to help people who are sick

DEA Raid on Billings Doctor Brings Pain Wars to Montana

https://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle-old/392/drnelson.shtml

The Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) war without quarter against what it sees as corrupt, pill-dealing physicians who are fueling a crisis in prescription drug abuse came to Montana last month. But with the raid on Billings physician Dr. Richard A. Nelson, who has been treating patients with opioids for chronic pain from cancer, arthritis, and other conditions, that all-too-familiar narrative has been challenged. An uproar that has yet to die down has gotten the attention of local media and at least one US senator as patients complain bitterly of being left in the lurch and national pain advocates arrived to press for justice for Dr. Nelson and his patients alike.

The uproar began on April 20, when DEA agents arrived at Nelson’s West End office and seized his medical records and prescribing certificate. The DEA did not tell Nelson at the time why he was being raided, except to say that agents served an “administrative inspection warrant.” Nelson was not arrested or charged with any offense, although that could be coming. The agency was still keeping mum this week, with Denver regional DEA spokesperson Karen Flowers telling DRCNet only that “this is an ongoing investigation.”

Nelson, who has been practicing medicine in Billings since the 1970s, has a spotless record with the state medical board. He does not prescribe the controversial but medically accepted mega-doses of opioids that have triggered DEA investigations of other pain treatment physicians. But two of his patients reportedly died from drug-related causes in the last year, perhaps drawing the interest of the DEA. Nelson’s practice remains open, and the DEA returned his files 10 days later, but he now cannot prescribe the medications needed by his chronic pain patients. The practice limps along under the cloud of the DEA raid.

While Nelson and his newly hired legal team wait to see what the DEA will do next, some 75 of his patients have been left out in the cold. Without Dr. Nelson, said patient Glen Wilkinson, Billings pain patients are finding adequate pain treatment hard to come by. “I ended up with Dr. Nelson as a last resort,” said Wilkinson, who suffers from chronic pain related to two herniated and nine broken discs in his spinal column. “I had no place else to go. He’s a good, honest doctor, but now I am being denied medical care based on my affiliation with him. My primary care physician told me he wouldn’t see me again after I went to Dr. Nelson.”

Wayne Nott, a retired rock quarry worker from Bridger suffering from a variety of painful complaints, including arthritis, multiple lipomas, and varicose veins who also lives with a titanium plate in his neck, is another patient of Dr. Nelson’s who is having trouble finding a doctor to treat him. He told DRCNet he traveled more than a hundred miles to go to an appointment with a doctor who had agreed to see him, but when he arrived he was turned away.

“When I got to the doctor’s office and told them I had an appointment, the receptionist asked for my name, then told me ‘You did have an appointment, but you don’t now.’ She told me she got a phone call 10 minutes before I arrived saying not to treat any patients from Dr. Nelson’s office. When I asked her who had told them that, she wouldn’t say, but I know it must have been the DEA,” Nott said.

“She told me I had to leave the building,” said Nott. “She acted like I was some kind of psycho. People think that people who went to Dr. Nelson are junkies. I’m no junkie. I hate to even take the stuff I’m taking, but I have to for my chronic pain.”

The physician in question, Dr. Ahmed Madi of Roundup, refused Thursday to discuss his reasons for turning Nott away. “I’m not interested, thank you very much. Bye,” was his response to a DRCNet inquiry.

Nott has related his account of his encounter with Dr. Madi’s office in a deposition provided to Dr. Nelson. He has also since managed to find a doctor to care for him, but in a telling indication of the atmosphere of fear and intimidation created by the DEA raid on Dr. Nelson, he asked that that doctor not be publicly named.

“This is horrible, I don’t know how it could get any worse,” said Dr. Nelson’s wife, Jerrie Lynn, an acupuncturist who shares her husband’s practice. “This is just unbelievably sad for the patients. The DEA is telling doctors not to see our patients,” she charged, “and telling drug stores not to fill our prescriptions.”

While patients who spoke with DRCNet backed Ms. Nelson’s charge that the DEA is intimidating physicians and pharmacies, with some saying local doctors told them as much, it is a difficult charge to prove. DEA spokeswoman Flowers flatly denied it. “Absolutely not,” she said. “That’s false. If these people have medical problems, they should seek medical help. The medical community is obligated to help people who are sick.”

Several patients told DRCNet St. Vincent Healthcare had turned them away, but the hospital denied both being told not to treat Dr. Nelson’s patients and that it was turning them away. “St. Vincent Healthcare assesses and treats all patients on an individual basis. We follow guidelines and protocols for treatment based on established criteria. There is no policy or practice to refuse care to any of Dr. Nelson’s patients,” said Nancy Kallern, vice-president for patient affairs. “No,” the hospital has not received notice from any agency advising it not to treat Dr. Nelson’s patients, she told DRCNet.

“I have no reason to believe those claims are false, but the problem is in confirming it,” said Siobhan Reynolds, executive director of the pain patients and physicians advocacy group the Pain Relief Network (PRN), who traveled to Billings last week to meet with Dr. Nelson and his patients. “Every time a doctor says this to a patient, they also say ‘You didn’t hear that from me.’ The intimidation is complete,” she said.

“Everyone is getting into the game,” Reynolds continued. “Pharmacies are turning down Dr. Nelson’s non-controlled scripts and insurance companies are declaring the doctor’s demise, despite the fact Dr. Nelson is still in possession of an unblemished record with Montana’s Board of Medical Examiners and is still practicing.”

Typically in cases where physicians are accused of prescription wrongdoing, they are left dangling in the wind while DEA agents and prosecutors use their access to the media to paint a one-sided picture of pill-mills and Dr. Feelgoods. Reynolds was determined not to let that happen in Billings, and her strategy has paid off — at least in public relations terms. In the last two weeks, the Billings Gazette has run at least three stories on the raid and its consequences, with titles such as “In Search of Relief: Pain Sufferers Caught in Medical Controversy” and “DEA Accused of Targeting Pain Doctors.”

The third article was provoked by a very unusual event in Billings. Last Friday, after letters to US Senators Max Baucus (D) and Conrad Burns (R) were ignored, Reynolds and three dozen patients went to Baucus’ Billings office to seek a meeting after his office turned down a request for a meeting the previous day. Standing outside the building until a staffer agreed to meet with them, they protested the DEA’s nationwide pattern of going after pain doctors and its local impact, and demanded their representatives do something about it. “We want him to call for and help organize a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on this issue,” said Reynolds. “We want to see an investigation into what the DEA has been doing, and we need the subpoena power of the Senate to get behind the veil and find out what is going on.”

“The feds and the state authorities can’t both be responsible for the regulation of Montana’s doctors,” said patient Gregg Wilkinson during the protest. “The medical board says Nelson is impeccable, while these Washington bureaucrats are saying he’s criminal. Somebody isn’t telling the truth.”

While Sen. Baucus was not present, office communications director Barrett Kaiser did come down to listen to patients’ concerns and promised to relay them to the senator. But, he told the crowd, it is hard to say what Baucus will do. The senator supports the justice system and has a policy of not interfering with criminal investigations or legal policies, Kaiser said.

It remains unclear what action, if any, Baucus will take. Kaiser failed to respond to any of DRCNet’s four calls seeking comment on the matter this week, and the office has made no other public remarks on the issue.

“Senator Baucus stonewalled us,” said Wilkinson. “Thirty-five people marched to his office, but he won’t even dignify us with an answer.”

“I’m watching people have their lives destroyed,” said Reynolds. “There are patients who were functional under Dr. Nelson who now can’t work or walk or even play with a two-year-old. The implications of this for these people are staggering. It is mind-boggling, but what is perhaps even more distressing is that their senators don’t seem to think it’s a problem,” said Reynolds. “They are stonewalling,” she told DRCNet. “I am just dumbstruck by the lack of concern displayed by elected officials here.”

Update: Late Thursday, Sen. Baucus responded — sort of — in a letter to Reynolds. Baucus reiterated his “policy of not interfering with criminal investigations” and did not address the larger question of the DEA’s aggressive behavior or the call for hearings in the Senate. But in a nice constituent service touch, he did contact the Deering Clinic in Billings on the patients’ behalf, which “has given assurance that all patients will be afforded the opportunity to be assessed by their staff for a continued pain management care plan.”

While that pledge is no guarantee of adequate opioid treatment for Dr. Nelson’s patients, the Pain Relief Network will be watching closely, said Reynolds. “We will be overseeing the care of these patients and will be providing the clinic with expert advice in the event they fail to treat patients appropriately.”

And while Sen. Baucus did not immediately acknowledge demands for a congressional look at the broader issues involved, his response was a first, said Reynolds. “This is a major step in the right direction. It’s the first time a US senator has acknowledged the humanity of people in pain,” she said.

While Dr. Nelson has the support of his patients, his colleagues in the medical profession have stayed largely silent or have been critical. The head of the Montana Medical Association, Dr. Joan McMahon of Lewistown, professed to be unfamiliar with the case and declined comment, saying only that “physicians have to follow DEA regulations.”

Dr. Bill Rosen, a specialist in physical medicine and rehabilitation at the Deaconness Billings Clinic scoffed at the use of opioids as pain medications. “Narcotics have never been shown to heal anything,” he told the Billings Gazette. “All you’re doing is putting a Band-Aid on a wound that will never heal.” While opioids may be appropriate in limited cases, he said, doctors are too quick to prescribe them for patients who could be helped in other ways. “People come in and tell me they are disabled by their pain,” Rosen said. “I say you are disabled from your inability to cope with your pain.”

Dr. Joseph Talley, a North Carolina physician whose practice was shut down by the state, found opioids useful for patients, but warned that doctors around Billings may decline to treat Dr. Nelson’s patients with them for fear of becoming a magnet for patients and ultimately the next target for the DEA. “An opioid prescriber will be swamped with patients, good and sinister, from near and far,” he told DRCNet. “As soon as the word gets out that a doctor will treat pain in adequate doses (which eliminates most doctors who prescribe at all) and will do so without making patients feel like dirty criminals (which eliminates all but a very tiny few of those remaining), the practice of those very few doctors will change drastically, and it will take on a form upon which the DEA can capitalize. He will have cars with out-of-state plates, desperate patients who couldn’t get an appointment milling around his door, and when he treats one desperate patient, he is likely to get 10 desperate calls from her friends, neighbors, and relatives wanting help themselves,” Talley said.

Unlike other prominent cases of physicians under the federal gun, Dr. Nelson was not prescribing massive amounts of opioids to patients, said his wife. “He doesn’t really go outside the guidelines,” she said. “He would prescribe maintenance doses and other prescriptions, but not the really high doses.”

“The DEA needs to be held accountable — at the very least it should be paying the medical bills for these people who have been adversely affected,” said Nelson. “People can’t function without their pain medications. Some have had to quit their jobs. One of our patients now has to have a person come in and care for him. And they are being treated like criminals when they go to the hospitals in search of relief.”

In the meantime, it appears that Billings-area physicians are already aware of Dr. Talley’s lesson and are staying away from opioids and patients who need them. “I was surviving on what Dr. Nelson gave me,” said Nott. “Now all I can do is lay in bed all day.”

Suing to get a “fix” to a financial ADDICTION ?

Editorial: Opioid lawsuits offer a quick high, quick letdown

https://www.abqjournal.com/1063312/opioid-lawsuits-offer-a-quick-high-quick-letdown.html

In this litigious world, New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas’ decision to join other states in suing Big Pharma over the nationwide opioid crisis makes a good headline. Ditto for the lawsuit from Mora County that preceded it and the one expected to follow from Bernalillo County. In fact, at last count the Washington Post had 25 states, cities and counties suing manufacturers, distributors and drugstore chains in connection with opioids, with more being filed almost weekly.

But it’s hard to determine how New Mexico residents would benefit from a far-from-guaranteed win.

While Balderas says the suit was filed to hold drug manufacturers and distributors “accountable” and to increase funding for opioid addiction treatment and law enforcement, it’s questionable that any money derived from it would actually be used for the stated purposes.

Remember when New Mexico won millions from Big Tobacco in a 1998 settlement agreement? The windfall, to an embarrassing extent, has ended up being a slush fund for legislative priorities that have nothing to do smoking’s impact. Tobacco settlement money has been used to balance the general budget, prop up the state lottery’s scholarship fund, cover costs for early childhood education – and the list goes on. Sure, some of that money from the “permanent” tobacco settlement fund pays for anti-smoking programs, but you get the picture.

Balderas contends opioid manufacturers “pushed highly addictive, dangerous opioids” on the public and failed to tell doctors how addictive they were. The suit also says drug distributors “violated their duties by selling huge quantities of opioids that were diverted from their lawful medical purpose,” thus causing an opioid/heroin/overdose epidemic.

Does anyone believe someone with a medical degree doesn’t understand opioids are addictive? Then again, suing individual doctor feel-goods who hand painkillers out like Pez is nowhere as promisingly lucrative as suing Big Pharma’s deep pockets. As for diverted opioids, how are distributors responsible for things they sell being stolen from people they sell them to?

And where is personal responsibility in all of this?

The suits also fail to mention that opioids have been around for decades, are highly effective painkillers many patients do use as prescribed, and New Mexico had a chronic heroin problem long before the current opioid crisis – largely because of proximity to Mexico and illegal drug trade routes.

Attributing the opioid crisis to manufacturers and distributors ignores the real problem – demand.

There is no denying that the widespread availability, and popularity, of opioids has exacerbated this state’s opioid addiction and overdose rates, and that more must be done to address the scourge. Reforms – including New Mexico’s Prescription Monitoring Program, which requires health care providers check a patient’s prescription history in the PMP database to block doctor shopping for drugs – are working. The state Health Department announced a 63 percent increase in providers using the PMP since last year and a 5 percent decline in opioid prescriptions.

Sure there’s a lure to joining major suits like this one: For a somewhat modest investment, the state or counties might eventually realize a windfall (nowhere equal to what plaintiffs attorneys will make by comparison). New Mexico gets millions annually from Big Tobacco.

In July, Balderas joined a lawsuit against six generic drugmakers, alleging they conspired to hike prices for a common antibiotic and a diabetes medication. More recently, he’s signed onto a suit seeking to block President Donald Trump’s attempt to scrap the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration program. While the former targets collusion and price gouging, and the latter is an immediate problem for about 7,300 DACA recipients here, this latest suit has a lot in common with the state’s opioid problem:

It delivers a quick high and a just-as-quick letdown.

Another Pharmacist imposing their personal biases on pt’s therapy ?

Hello my name is xxx  xxxxxx and my wife xxxxx  .We read a article on the internet that was about ( can a pharmacist refuse to fill a legitimate prescription).  After reading this i am really not sure if a pharmacist at Walmart can refuse to fill it.On 9-6-2017 my wife xxxxx had her dr. appointment and received a prescription that was a e script to Walmart in montecello  n.y.  When she arrived to the store the pharmacist told her she would not fill it because of the amount. She has been going there for the past 5 or more years and never had a problem with the same prescription from the same dr. After a few hrs. going back to the dr office to get it changed to rite aid and they filled it with no problem  then I called Walmart corporate office to speak with some one about it and was told some one would call me back but never did maybe you can advise me of this.                             thank you

Fibromyalgia – The Pain We Live

Oregon Sets Major Precedent—Will No Longer Treat Drug Possession as a Felony

Oregon Sets Major Precedent—Will No Longer Treat Drug Possession as a Felony

www.thefreethoughtproject.com/oregon-drug-possession-felony/

Oregon — A wise person once said that insanity can be defined by doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result. If we apply this definition to the war on drugs, then every proponent of it needs to be locked in a psychiatric hospital. Not only has kidnapping and caging people for possessing arbitrary substances not worked — but it’s made it far worse.

Using government force, ie the police, to curb addiction has had disastrous results. Not only has the drug war given the United States the world record for the largest prison population but it’s also given rise to one hellish police state. Luckily, however, a very small group of bureaucrats has been able to chip away at the drug war, by slowly rolling back the laws which allow it to continue.

Oregon is one such place.

A new bill, signed into law this week by Oregon Gov. Kate Brown makes personal and possession of cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine and other hard drugs a misdemeanor instead of a felony.

Oregon now joins a tiny minority of other states that have stopped throwing drug addicts in cages.

Naturally, the ardent drug warriors are furious for several reasons. First off, the District Attorney, Rick Wesenberg said, “The bottom line is that it gives drug users and abusers more freedom to break the law with less consequences.”

Wesenberg is one of those individuals who fit the definition of insanity and thinks that continuing to kidnap and cage people for using drugs may some day have a different result.

READ MORE:  Legendary Author of “Rich Dad, Poor Dad” Admits He Was Recruited by CIA to Run Drugs

“Douglas County is in opioid crisis, and in a meth crisis, and in a heroin crisis,” Wesenberg said. “The governor and the Legislature just blunted law enforcement’s most effective tool in combating drug addiction.”

If this tool was so effective, why — over the last 5 decades — has it failed? Every. Single. Time.

Wesenberg was joined in his fear mongering by Linn County District Attorney Doug Marteeny, who said, “To change the classification of this behavior from a felony to a misdemeanor is tantamount to telling our school children that tomorrow it will be less dangerous to use methamphetamine than it is today.”

 

Both Wesenberg and Marteeny, however, are very misguided. Research shows — as in the case of Portugal — decriminalizing drugs and treating addicts instead of caging them, can produce paradigm shattering results.

Sadly, however, instead of helping people, who clearly have physical and mental addictions and need help, most state governments still lock people in cages when they catch them with drugs.

However, research — according to many law enforcement officials — shows that the cost of incarceration, especially for repeat drug offenders, is far higher than simply treating their addiction.

The good news is that people like Wesenberg and Marteeny are quickly finding themselves obsolete. Law enforcement across the country are realizing that treatment — not cages — curbs the problem of addiction far more successfully. This includes cops in Oregon too.

As Oregon’s News-Review notes, among the bill’s supporters, are the Oregon Association Chiefs of Police and the Oregon State Sheriffs’ Association, which said felony convictions include unintended consequences, including barriers to housing and employment. But the two groups, in a letter to a state senator who backed the bill, said the new law “will only produce positive results if additional drug treatment resources accompany this change in policy.”

 
READ MORE:  Ferguson Protesters File Mass Restrainer Order Against Mo. Police

The good news in this regard is that cops and local governments are changing their policy — and it is working.

These changes in policy have led to the creation of the Angel Program.

The concept of helping addicts instead of criminalizing them is such a success, it’s been adopted by 200 police agencies in 28 states.

Aside from the angel program, stopping the war on drugs is also having a heavy effect on reducing opioid overdoses.

As TFTP has reported at length, states with legal cannabis see far fewer overdoses than those who cage people for the plant.

Solutions to this epidemic exist, but in order for them to be successful, government must legalize freedom and admit that the war on drugs is an epic failure. While things may seem bleak, these tiny changes are already beginning to have a major positive effect.

Soon enough, the dinosaurs who continue to push the drug war will be seen as the tyrants they are. To all those in law enforcement, you will do well to place yourself on the right side of history — which, most assuredly, does not involve kidnapping, caging, and killing people in a failed war to control what those people do with their own bodies.

equianalgesic opiate dosing tables are problematic and INACCURATE

New Guidance For Policymakers And Payers On Opioid Dosing Limits

http://www.integrativepainmanagement.org/news/362581/New-Guidance-For-Policymakers-And-Payers-On-Opioid-Dosing-Limits.htm

New white paper reviews the science behind calculating morphine equivalent doses and shows why policies based on these can be problematic

LENEXA, KS, September 6, 2017 – The Academy of Integrative Pain Management (AIPM) today released a new white paper, entitled, Opioid Dosing Policy: Pharmacological Considerations Regarding Equianalgesic Dosing. This white paper provides guidance to policymakers and payers, who are increasingly responding to the nation’s opioid epidemic by limiting doses of opioid pain relievers. In so doing, however, they may be unwittingly exposing patients to increased risk due to an inadequate understanding of the science underlying the concept of equianalgesic dosing.

Because opioids differ in their per-milligram potency, equianalgesic dosing tables are used to calculate equivalent doses of different opioids, which are often expressed in terms of “morphine equivalent daily doses”. As outlined in the white paper, the science supporting these tables and the larger concept of equianalgesic dosing is problematic, and using them to determine allowable opioid pain reliever doses can expose patients to both unintentional overdose and underdose.

“In the interest of the people with pain for whom our members provide care, we felt it was necessary to outline our concerns about the key concept of equianalgesic dosing,” said Bob Twillman, Ph.D., Executive Director of AIPM. “We have seen policymakers and payers both relying on this concept as if it was based on solid science, and as if individual differences in a number of factors wasn’t important in clinical practice. Doing so can expose patients to significant risks, and we want to help mitigate those risks by encouraging more deliberative practices.”

“I’ve been researching and writing about the problems with equianalgesic dosing for the past several years, so I was pleased to be asked to serve as the primary author on this document,” stated Jeffrey Fudin, Pharm.D. “As I studied this concept, I was shocked by the poor quality of the studies underlying it and by the dramatic clinical effects that could result from an uncritical use of published conversion tables. Add to that the fact that some opioid pain medications just don’t fit the concept because of their mechanisms of action, and you have the potential for some serious negative consequences if policies improperly use this information.”

AIPM encourages policymakers and payers to review the white paper carefully and to consider its implications if they attempt to fashion opioid dosing policies that rely on the concept of equianalgesic dosing. “We hope this will help policymakers and payers develop better, safer policies that protect patients from overdose while also ensuring that people with pain get the treatment they need for their pain,” added Twillman.

The full text of the document can be found here.