EDS and Chronic Pain News & Info
edsinfo.wordpress.com/2016/10/23/summary-of-posts-about-the-opioid-crisis/
https://edsinfo.wordpress.com/
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »
www.thinkprogress.org/sessions-painkillers-purdue-dd0261c2101c/
“Today we are facing the deadliest drug crisis in American history,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Thursday in West Virginia, the latest stop on his ongoing tour of places hit hardest by opioid addiction and overdose deaths.
“Talk to the police about it, and they’ll tell you many people became addicted almost the first time they tried these powerful and addictive drugs,” Sessions said.
But despite acknowledging the severity of the opioid crisis today, the rest of Sessions speech ignored the role of the corporations that have sold these pills over the years.
Thursday’s speech hit most of the same notes Sessions has struck in other appearances to discuss opioid addiction, treatment, and law enforcement. He echoed Nancy Reagan’s call to “just say no” and offered tepid praise for treatment programs. He even used the fact that treatment too often fails to save addicts’ lives as a springboard to focus on enforcement.
Sessions mentioned drug manufacturers only once — a shout-out to former pharma industry lobbyist turned West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey for suing some of the companies he used to represent — then launched into several paragraphs of detailed criticism of doctors, dealers, and gangs.
Sessions’ speech focused on users and ignored the other end of the prescription drug pipeline. Like other law enforcement figures, Sessions rarely discusses the drug approval processes that allowed companies like Purdue Pharmaceuticals to make misleading claims about their drugs, or the legal logics that keep the Sackler family that owns Purdue safe from lawsuits.
The crisis Sessions lamented Thursday began with the introduction of OxyContin in 1996. The drug’s ubiquity and high price have helped the Sacklers to amass a $14 billion fortune over the years.
OxyContin caught on because it was marketed as a wonder-drug that could wipe out extreme pain for 12 hours off of a single dose. “Unlike short-acting pain medications, which must be taken every 3 to 6 hours,” Purdue wrote in a 1996 press release, “OxyContin Tablets are taken every 12 hours, providing smooth and sustained pain control all day and all night.”
It’s by now well known that Purdue’s marketing overpromised, and the drug underdelivered. “The drug wears off hours early in many people,” the Los Angeles Times reported in a groundbreaking investigation of the company last year, “and when it doesn’t last, patients can experience excruciating symptoms of withdrawal, including an intense craving for the drug.”
Most damningly, the Times’ expose found, Purdue knew its marketing was a lie. Its own drug trials had shown as much, the Times found, yet the company “held fast to the claim of 12-hour relief, in part to protect its revenue… Without that, it offers little advantage over less expensive painkillers.”
After the drug hit the market, more real-world evidence of OxyContin’s shortcomings began piling up atop the internal trials evidence. Purdue simply recommended upping a patient’s dose – not increasing the frequency with which a patient takes the same concentration of the heroin-lite medication, but dumping larger volumes of it into the bloodstream at the same “smooth and sustained” 12-hour clip.
Heroin and its chemical relatives have an especially pernicious effect on human brain chemistry. Unlike cannabis – Sessions’ personal bugaboo – the withdrawal of opioids from a neurology that’s become dependent upon them is violent and debilitating.
OxyContin isn’t the main murder weapon in the 60,000-plus overdose deaths in 2016 that Sessions cited on Thursday. It is more often heroin, increasingly cut with the even-more-dangerous pharmaceutical invention fentanyl.
But putting a civilian with a pain problem on OxyContin, telling them they’re going to feel fine for 12 hours, then telling them not to take any more even though their pain has resurfaced just a few hours later? That amounts to leaving patients stuck between the pill bottle warnings on one side and the lure of cheaper, harder hits of the same brain chemicals from some street dealer. It’s “the perfect recipe for addiction,” as Dr. Theodore Cicero told the Times.
Hundreds of thousands of people have died in the United States from prescription drug overdoses since OxyContin went on the market.
Purdue, meanwhile, has racked up billions in profits – thanks in part to an aggressive internal sales culture built on telling doctors the answer to problems with OxyContin was almost always more OxyContin, the Times found — and stymied every serious attempt to claw back some of that money to the victims of the epidemic.
The lawsuits started piling up fast, within the drug’s first six years on the market. But the corporate-friendly eccentricities of American liability law kept Purdue’s ill-gotten profits out of reach. Most the more than 100 lawsuits over OxyContin dosing deceptions have been dismissed because of “a legal doctrine which shields drug companies from liability when their products are prescribed by trained physicians.”
Where courtroom shields were at risk of cracking, Purdue wrote checks to make cases go away. West Virginia itself won one of the largest settlements Purdue’s ever paid, a $10 million handshake deal that the company only offered after its lawyer – future Attorney General Eric Holder – failed to convince a judge to dismiss the case before trial.
Trial records are public. Taking the fight further would mean exposing Purdue’s secrets to every other lawyer in the world, a class-action nightmare that could threaten the Sackler family’s Oxy fortune. Out came the checkbook.
To this day, the Sacklers have retained their titanic fortune. Even as official attention turns squarely to opioid users, prescribers, and distributors, the people who actually created the drugs Sessions and other government officials decry can apparently rest easy.
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »
It seems like “everyone” is trying to be involved in the “fake opiate crisis”. President Trump has declared it a national emergency, Dr. Tom Price, Sec of Health and Human Services, Jeff Session, Attorney General have apparently signed on to the national emergency.
Growing number of states’ Attorney generals are suing the Phama’s, drug wholesalers, and have told insurance companies that unless they cut back on paying for opiates that they will be sued as well.
Many cities and counties are piling on suing the same group of entities mentioned above.
Recently CVS Health announced that they were going to limit the days supply of opiates their pharmacists can dispense – regardless what the prescriber writes for – and their PBM division will start put MME/day limits that follows the CDC guidelines, but they will allow employers or insurers to opt out – pts and prescribers apparently have no options in the pt’s care.
Walgreens has their “Good Faith Policies” that their employed pharmacist must follow in regards to filling opiate/controlled meds prescriptions.
Recently, an attorney was posting on the web… looking for people for a whistle blower cases against those who a person believes a particular healthcare providers are providing “excessive opiates” to pts. In whistle blower cases, those that bring attention to those Medicare/Medicaid pts are involved with fraud and abuse of the system… will share in the “spoils’ if the case is won against a provider. Sometimes that “shared amount” can be in the MILLIONS
Why aren’t we seeing the same whistle blower lawsuits against all those doctors who are administering methylprednisolone ESI therapy… since neither the company that discovered the medication ( UpJohn) nor the FDA recommends this medication used in this manner. Is that not fraud and abuse of Medicare/Medicaid ?
If no one has bothered to notice that the common denominator in all of this is our JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND ATTORNEYS !
40%+ of Congress is ATTORNEYS… who creates all of these laws…
Dept of Justice includes DEA, FBI, attorneys, judges/courts, jails/prisons
The DEA licenses prescribers, wholesalers, pharmacies, pharmas
Who is suing or threatening to sue prescribers, wholesalers, pharmacies, insurance/PBM’s — ATTORNEYS
There are other “players” … FDA, CDC and I am sure that there will eventually be more.
Of course, long ago… bureaucrats indemnified themselves from being sued by declared that they have sovereign immunity.
Sovereign immunity does not protect the laws/interpretation of laws from being challenged in our court system of being unconstitutional.
Then there are the employed chain pharmacists who are following corporate policy that has basically mandated that they change the prescriptions for certain medications and for a certain class/category of pts. Besides the discrimination of pts covered under the Americans with Disability Act and Civil Rights Act… one of the basics of the practice of medicine is the starting, changing, stopping a pt’s medication. So a pharmacist following corporate policies most likely is exceeding what he/she is authorized under the state’s pharmacy practice act.
The same may apply to prescribers that are being forced by their corporate employer – typically a hospital – are “forcing” their employee/prescribers to conform to the corporation’s policy and not be able to use their professional judgement – as provided by the state’s practice act – as to what is the best therapy for a particular pt.
Of course, a audio/video recording is going to be obligatory because otherwise it is going to be the pt’s word against the healthcare professional and the pt risks the possibility to be declared a drug seeker… so that the healthcare professionals can CYA themselves and their employer.
Most likely, those professional licensing boards are not going to do much against the healthcare professionals… remember… all the members of the licensing boards are also the same as those you are filling complaints against and they are also licensed by the DEA and don’t want to take a chance going against the “DEA agenda”.
Has it become time for the chronic pain community to unite and create a “legal defense fund” … so that the chronic pain community can go after the “low hanging fruit” and start refocusing the healthcare provider’s fear of the DEA and their provider and towards the pts.
This needs to be done this way, because when is the last time that you saw an attorney suing another attorney ?
Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »
https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/lets-stop-hysterical-rhetoric-about-opioid-crisis
President Trump held a meeting earlier this summer with the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), and other advisers to take a deep dive into solving the nation’s worsening opioid overdose problem.
The Trump administration is clearly shifting into high gear on this issue. HHS Secretary Price, for example, agreed with a reporter during the press briefing that followed, when the reporter called it a “national emergency.” Even more disturbing, however, were recent assertions made by New Jersey Governor Chris Christie in a recent interview. Christie, who heads a White House Drug Addiction Task Force, claims that in 2015 doctors prescribed enough opioid painkillers to medicate every American adult for 3 weeks.
If these numbers appear implausible or like they are missing some context, it’s because they are. And the Administration’s resorting to hyperbole creates an atmosphere of panic that is likely to lead to policies that will only make matters worse.
Let’s start with the context-dropping. What does the governor mean by “medicated?” To a practitioner “medicated” means being treated with a medicine in order to achieve a desired result. Does that mean one 5mg oxycodone tablet every 4 hours (6 per day) for 21 days? Some patients are prescribed two 5mg tablets every 6 hours. Or is he talking about 7.5 or 10 mg oxycodone tablets? Maybe he means hydrocodone. That also comes in 5mg, 7.5mg, and 10mg doses and is sometimes prescribed every 4 hours but sometimes every 6 hours. Then there’s hydromorphone (dilaudid), oxycontin, and let’s not forget codeine.
The point is, millions of Americans have genuine, medically necessary reasons to be taking opioids. They make up the vast majority of opioid users and it doesn’t make sense to lump them into the opioid crisis.
And opioid use itself, for medical purposes or otherwise, is indeed decreasing. In July the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported that prescriptions for opioids by health care providers have been coming down. And the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) has reported that nonmedical use of prescription opioids peaked in 2012 and has been steadily dropping.
That’s not to say the problem is resolving itself. Unfortunately deaths from opioid overdose have been steadily increasing, reaching a new peak of 33,000 in 2015. For the first time the majority of those deaths were from heroin overdose, and the death rate from fentanyl overdose comprised over 4,000 of those deaths. Meanwhile, overdose deaths from prescription opioids have stabilized.
With the crisis already this severe, it’s crucial we get the facts right. Frightening and imprecise rhetoric leads to hastily designed policies with unintended consequences, often making matters worse.
Not all solutions are created equal. States have made the opioid antidote naloxone more available to chronic pain patients and to first responders. And more money is being spent on rehab programs. But so far most proposals for dealing with the overdose problem focus on increased surveillance on patients and providers, inducing doctors to prescribe fewer opioids, and making manufacturers cut back on the amount of opioids produced.
No matter how much regulators clamp down on the medical use of opioids the overdose rate grows. Yet the overwhelming majority of overdose victims are not patients receiving opioids for pain. Less than 1% of well-screened patients become addicted to opioids, according to a 2010 Cochrane analysis. A less comprehensive 2015 review from researchers at the University of New Mexico found the addiction rate ranged from 8-12%. And the CDC has cited a recent study showing the risk of overdose in non-cancer patients chronically receiving opioids for pain at less than 0.2 percent.
In fact, it’s fair to say that many of the deaths from opioid overdoses are the result of drug prohibition. Opioids obtained on the black market are often counterfeit and frequently laced with dangerous additives, such as fentanyl and carfentanil. The dosages are unknown or unreliable. Prohibition also increases profits to drug dealers peddling cheaper and more powerful narcotics.
If policy makers in the Trump administration want to effectively address the problem, there are other ways to do it. They should promote “harm reduction” programs, including pilot “heroin maintenance” programs, such as those that have worked successfully in Switzerland, the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, and Canada. They should also take note of recent evidence from Johns Hopkins University, the University of Michigan, and the RAND Corporation that have shown a dramatic decrease in opioid use and overdose rates in states that have legalized marijuana for medicinal use.
The opioid overdose problem requires a calm and reasoned approach, and a willingness to admit to previous policy mistakes. Rhetoric aimed at frightening the public does not foretell a propitious start.
Filed under: General Problems | 3 Comments »
www.paindr.com/proper-nanny/#comment-314399
Bulletin: Heroin and Fentanyl Dealers are Ignoring Morphine Sulfate Equivalent (MSE) Limits and Offering Ultra High Dose Unit Opioids in the Sale of Their Products
For some, this week is a time of self-reflection and repentance for sins or mistakes one has made over the past year. In the spirit of this reflection, Dr. Morty Fein and I teamed up to bring you this blog post. The general theme here reflects on MSE, because at its core, the concept is flawed and we are hurting honest people by employing policies based on pseudoscience and flawed data.
The hurt caused to chronic pain patients requiring long-term opioids is something upon which PROPagandists, lawmakers and third payer policy makers should reflect. The glaring imperfections of MSEs are outlined in the Academy of Integrative Pain Management’s White Paper posted on their website just this month, entitled Opioid Dosing Policy:Pharmacological Considerations Regarding Equianalgesic Dosing.
And now, PROPaganda is taking a page from former NY mayor Mike Bloomberg’s roundly criticized policy attempting to place limits on the size of soft drinks, a policy that got everyone riled up about the “nanny state.” Heaven forbid anyone try to help people limit their self-destructive behavior this way. They will all just buy multiple drinks people argued. And how dare Bloomberg tell me how much sugar I can ingest at one sitting, through one straw, from one barrel?
The anti-opioid lobby have defined a new target – ultra high dose unit opioids (UHDUOs) – and they have petitioned FDA for the removal from the market. MSE limits, “pill” limits, duration limits are not enough for them. Their next PROPosterous PROPosal is for people with cancer or those being treated for severe pain by a pain expert (and therein not allegedly subject to CDC guidelines and other artificial and unscientific limits imposed by the payors and some states) to take mouthfuls of tablets or capsules from their oversized prescription bottles that have even more dose units for sale or use by their kids. The Bloomberg analogy breaks down here because those patients who need higher strength dose units are not being self-destructive they are simply taking their medicine. With upwards of a quarter of people with pain in one survey endorsing problems with swallowing their medicine, this seems cruel and unusual to make them take twice as many and more pills or capsules.
Limit upon limit upon limit upon limit. They are a broken record. Prescribing is down 15-20% and yet the death toll keeps rising. And everyone acknowledges that the abusers have moved on to heroin and illicit fentanyl in any case which is why our policies are failing. But let’s keep searching for our lost keys on the side of the block where the light is better even though we lost them on the dark side of the street.
WAIT. I HAVE A BRILLIANT IDEA.
Let’s subject heroin and illicit fentanyl dealers to MSE limits. And let’s eliminate their UHDUOs. We can have a campaign, Kudos for the elimination of your UHDUOs. While we nickel and dime people with pain, heroin dealers are offering the world limitless access and you don’t even need to deal with some insurance company bureaucrat to get what you need. You do need to pay cash though and break the law and take your life in your hands but hey that’s not as bad as a prior auth. Or being humiliated at your pharmacy or dealing with your burned out, surly healthcare provider.
We can’t even calculate the MSE limits for the average illicit fentanyl product laced with impurities such as bootleg carfentanil and w know that doses of carfentanil alone must exceed limits because they can be used to thwart a Chechen terroist attack. Heroin on the other hand we can calculate, because pure heroin (unlaced) is diacetyl-morphine which in essence is two morphine molecules on either side of a 2-carbon chain (an acetyl group). That acetyl group is similar to what we all know as vinegar. A typical snorted or injected dose of heroin ranges from 5-20mgs and injectors use on average about 4 times per day. A habit of 5-20mgs four times daily means a total daily dose of 20-80mgs per day for an MSE of 40mgs to 160mgs MSEs. Thereby, many not even very heavy users are able to use at a dose that exceeds the top of most states’ MSE levels but of course your friendly neighborhood dealer won’t stop there.
It is time to move towards clinically sound solutions to prescription opioid abuse, diversion and overdose that don’t continue to attempt to solve the problem of heroin and illicit fentanyl abuse by further penalizing if not torturing law abiding citizens with chronic pain. More adequate reimbursement for clinician time and the use of reimbursed tools such as urine drug monitoring and the time it takes to understand trends and results of prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP), and sensible policies that allow safer and faster access to the potentially safest products and even the removal of MSE ceilings for drugs to which they don’t apply, would be a start.
But it sure would be nice to get focused on the problem as it exists now as compared to a few years ago. Bloomberg was just trying to protect us from ourselves; pain patients don’t need PROP to be their nanny.
As always, comments are welcome!
Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »
According to a recent press release – see link above – they are going to EMPOWER their employee pharmacist to make the final determination if a pt has a valid medical necessity for a particular medication. Our country has a serious – and growing – pharmacist surplus… so any pharmacy that continues to employ pharmacist that seems to “enjoy” denying care to certain classes of pts… then these corporate pharmacy employers are complicit in denying necessary care to pts… The primary charge of the various state boards of Pharmacy is to PROTECT THE PUBLIC’S HEALTH AND SAFETY… and where are they ?
Here is a link http://www.ncpanet.org/home/find-your-local-pharmacy to help pts locate a independent pharmacy where you are dealing with the Pharmacist/owner… whose primary function is to fill legit/on time/medically necessary for pts and doesn’t “play games” with pt’s healthcare needs.
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/09/21/cvs-health-opioid-prescriptions/685201001/
Drug-store chain CVS Health plans to announce Thursday that it will limit opioid prescriptions in an effort to combat the epidemic that accounted for 64,000 overdose deaths last year alone.
Amid pressure on pharmacists, doctors, insurers and drug companies to take action, CVS also said it would boost funding for addiction programs, counseling and safe disposal of opioids.
The company’s prescription drug management division, CVS Caremark, which provides medications to nearly 90 million people, said it would use its sweeping influence to limit initial opioid prescriptions to seven-day supplies for new patients facing acute ailments.
It will instruct pharmacists to contact doctors when they encounter prescriptions that appear to offer more medication than would be deemed necessary for a patient’s recovery. The doctor would be asked to revise it. Pharmacists already reach out to physicians for other reasons, such as when they prescribe medications that aren’t covered by a patient’s insurance plan.
The plan also involves capping daily dosages and initially requiring patients to get versions of the medications that dispense pain relief for a short period instead of a longer duration.
CVS CEO Larry Merlo told USA TODAY that the company had often been asked to fill prescriptions of 30 to 60 of the powerful pills at a time for conditions that required a much more limited amount.
“We see that all too often in the marketplace and we believe it’s appropriate to limit those prescriptions to a much more moderate and appropriate supply,” he said. “We think this can help make an impact.”
He declined to wade into the debate over the role of drug companies, physicians and others in causing the crisis.
“From my perspective, it’s not a blame game at this point,” he said. “I think as healthcare stakeholders we all play an important role in being part of the solution.”
Separately, CVS rival Walgreens announced plans for a new marketing campaign aimed at educating teenagers about the danger of opioids.
Taken together, the initiatives reflect an increasingly active role on behalf of two of the nation’s largest retailers in combating a deadly epidemic.
The White House has declared this week as Prescription Opioid and Heroin Epidemic Awareness Week.
President Trump recently announced plans to declare the opioid crisis as a national emergency, though the official declaration was still under a legal review as of last week. The move could free up certain federal resources to tackle the epidemic.
With more than 9,600 locations, CVS said it would also empower its pharmacists to proactively educate patients about the dangers of opioids and encourage shorter prescriptions to prevent addictions.
“The whole effort here is to try to reduce the number of people who are going to end up with some sort of opioid addiction problem,” CVS Chief Medical Officer Troyen Brennan said in an interview.
Pharmacists are the front lines of prescription drug distribution and so can play key roles in educating consumers about the dangers of opioids, said Mohamed Jalloh, spokesman for the American Pharmacists Association.
“Pharmacists are going to be stepping up their role to be able to spot questionable behavior,” he said.
One area where the nation’s largest drug-store chains are increasingly active is in providing safe ways to dispose of excess opioids. CVS said it would add safe disposal kiosks to 750 of its stores.
Walgreens, which does not have a pharmacy benefits manager like CVS and thus cannot limit prescription dosages on its own, has already stationed disposal kiosks at about 600 pharmacies throughout the country, spokesman Phil Caruso said.
Walgreens also Wednesday launched a new marketing campaign dubbed “#ItEndsWithUs,” featuring “13 Reasons Why” actor Brandon Larracuente highlighting the risks of opioids and new online resources.
Filed under: General Problems | 6 Comments »
I live in PA and have a 13 year old son with prescriptions for Vyvance and Strattera. I have been told on a number of occasions that I can’t fill his Vyvance prescription because “it’s too early”, but I can’t seem to get a straight answer about when I can fill it. I like to get it taken care of a business day or two ahead of time, in case the pharmacy doesn’t have the dosage, or there’s an insurance issue, both of which have happened on more than one occasion. The pharmacist made an exception when we were going away for a long weekend, but he got angry at me and I’m not sure I understand why. When my son went away to summer camp for a week and I needed to make sure he had 7 days worth of meds, I thought the pharmacist was going to have a stroke.
I am truly trying to follow the rules, but I can’t get anyone to tell me what the rules are. It seems to differ from pharmacist to pharmacist at the same pharmacy. I always go to the same Walgreens, so am a known customer. Is there a law that regulates the timing of the refilling of this medication? I don’t feel like I’m being treated like a criminal, as some do, but I feel like I’m being given the run-around, and no one seems to care about the importance of the patient having his medication.
Any advice you can offer would be appreciated!
I guess that many of these chain pharmacists must believe that everyone’s life is a “perfect circle” and that there is no “bumps in the road” of a pt’s life.. especially those suffering from subjective disease and in this particular case a 13 y/o kid.
Since this 13 y/o is probably in junior high and just imagine all the people around him (teachers, classmates and his family at home) that are going to have to deal with his compromised “quality of life” if he goes without his medication(s) for a couple days.
What if he flunks a test because he couldn’t concentrate enough to study or can’t focus while taking the test.. because of his lack of medication ? There has been incidents of the cops called on kids who have become unruly in class or school and it is not outside of the possibility for a ADD/ADHD kid off their medications.
There can be consequences to pts who attempt to get their prescriptions filled at a store whose pharmacists are always “by the numbers”… medication not in inventory, insurance problems, floater pharmacist who seem to “never be comfortable”.
Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »
The number of drug overdose deaths in Minnesota continued rising in 2016, with a 9.2 percent increase over the previous year.
The number of drug overdose deaths is nearly six times higher than in 2000, with 637 overdose deaths, most of which occurred in the seven-county metro area. Greater Minnesota’s death rate held steady last year, with a sharp increase in methamphetamine and psychostimulant overdose deaths counterbalanced by a decrease in opioid involved deaths, according to the Minnesota Department of Health.
Statewide, opioids are accountable for the greatest number of drug overdose deaths, with 375 cases, 186 of which involved prescribed opioids like oxycodone and hydrocodone. There were 96 synthetic opioid-involved deaths, most of which involved fentanyl. Deaths connected to synthetic opioid overdoses increased nearly 80 percent from 2015 numbers.
“The alarm is growing louder year after year as we continue to see the costly impact of ‘diseases of despair’ such as chronic pain, depression, chemical dependency and suicide,” said Minnesota Commissioner of Health Dr. Ed Ehlinger.
In an attempt to pool statewide efforts to curb opioid addition, MDH has set up an online “Opioid Dashboard” to provide access to data abd results for health care providers, pharmacies, local public health organizations, social service providers, and advocacy organizations as well as the general public.
“Launching a new data dashboard will consolidate our tracking efforts into one place and help us better work together to help Minnesotans learn about prevention and treatment options, and to avoid the trap of drug abuse,” Ehlinger said.
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »
https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/more-longterm-opioid-prescriptions-drive-increasing-use/
Baltimore, MD—Pharmacists are filling many more prescriptions for opioids now than at the end of the last century, and a disturbing percentage of them are for long-term use.
That’s according to a new study from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, which determined that opioid prescription use jumped significantly between 1999 and 2014. Much of the increase was related to prescriptions for 90 days or longer, notes the article, published online by the journal Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety.
Results of the review were based on data from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey, which the National Center for Health Statistics has conducted every 2 years since 1999–2000. Prescription opioid use increased from 4.1% of U.S. adults in 1999–2000 to 6.8% in 2013–2014, a 60% increase. At the same time, long-term prescription opioid use, defined as 90 days or more, increased from 1.8% in 1999–2000 to 5.4% in 2013–2014.
Of all opioid users in 2013–2014, 79.4% were long-term users compared with 45.1% in 1999-2000, according to the researchers, who point out that long-term use was associated with poorer physical health, concurrent benzodiazepine use, and history of heroin use.
“What’s especially concerning is the jump in long-term prescription opioid use, since it’s linked to increased risks for all sorts of problems, including addiction and overdoses,” explained study author Ramin Mojtabai, MD, PhD, MPH, a professor in the Department of Mental Health at the Bloomberg School. “The study also found that long-term use was associated with heroin use as well as the concurrent use of benzodiazepines, a class of widely prescribed drugs that affect the central nervous system,” he says.
Combining opioids and benzodiazepines significantly increases the risk of overdose, even if the patient is taking a moderate dosage of opioid medication, Mojtabai points out.
For the report, Mojtabai examined eight consecutive biannual surveys, each of which included over 5,000 adults living throughout the U.S. Interviews were conducted via computer in participants’ homes. Participants, totaling more than 47,000 over the eight surveys, were asked to identify prescription medications they had taken in the past 30 days, and for what length of time. The response rate ranged from 71% to 84%.
Opioid-medication use overall and long-term use was more common among participants on Medicaid and Medicare versus private insurance, noted Mojtabai, who added that no randomized clinical trials support opioids’ extended use, because of the risks.
A survey of 5000 people, when there is a estimated 100 + million chronic pain pts… seems like a rather SMALL SAMPLING… and just how were these pts selected for this survey ?
A reported 60% increase in opiate prescriptions from 1999-2000 to 2013 – 2014… does that number compensate for the fact that our population grows about 3%/yr… so in the same time frame our population was abt 40% greater… so based on per million population.. the growth was really MAYBE – 20% ?
This report time frame mostly encompasses what was declared the “decade of pain” when the Joint Commission that accredits all hospitals to be eligible for Medicare/Medicaid payments declared pain the “Fifth Vital Sign” and made it a MAJOR STANDARD for hospitals to meet and the failure to meet that standard could mean that the hospital loss their accreditation…
Imagine that there is… “….no randomized clinical trials support opioids’ extended use, because of the risks …”
perhaps clinical trials of new/unproven medications have MORE RISKS than a clinical trial of a otherwise known safe medication. Can you say… LAME EXCUSE ???
Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »