Healthcare … is all about the money ?

Hospital facing loss of federal money asked nurses to falsify records, inspectors say

https://www.kansascity.com/news/business/health-care/article213180824.html

Blue Valley Hospital offered employee discounts on weight-loss surgery and asked workers to falsify records to try to pump up its inpatient numbers enough to continue getting Medicare money, according to inspectors.

So far, it hasn’t worked.

U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson this week dismissed Blue Valley Hospital’s lawsuit against the agency that runs Medicare. Robinson wrote in her dismissal ruling that the court system can’t intervene every time a hospital is dinged financially for not following Medicare rules and, given what inspectors found during an initial inspection in November and a followup in April, this is not a case that warrants intervention.

“BVH was tagged with numerous deficiencies in both surveys, including compromise of patient care,” Robinson wrote. “As such, the government interest in protecting patients through an expeditious provider-termination procedure is quite strong.”

Blue Valley Hospital, a four-bed facility at 12850 Metcalf Ave. in Overland Park, is now set to lose its Medicare reimbursements starting Friday.

The hospital, which mostly does bariatric procedures, has said that could cripple it financially. Its lawyers filed a last-ditch appeal this week and asked that the reimbursements keep flowing until the appeal is heard.

“There has been no effect on existing patients and the hospital is still accepting new patients,” Blue Valley Hospital attorney Curtis Tideman said via email. “Blue Valley Hospital is still very hopeful that this entire issue will be resolved quickly and appropriately.”

Blue Valley Hospital filed suit after the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services pulled its certification. The agency cited an inspection that found the facility didn’t treat enough patients and wasn’t performing enough surgeries that require long stays to qualify for the higher Medicare reimbursements it had been receiving as an inpatient hospital.

Hospital officials have said that the loss of Medicare certification is due only to a technical change in the way federal rules are interpreted. They say the quality of care that patients receive is not an issue.

But Robinson wrote that inspectors found several patient care red flags when they made a followup survey after the lawsuit was filed.

“The re-survey found that BVH ‘failed to use safe practices for medication administration,’ ” Robinson wrote, “and cited examples of failing to document or properly monitor medication administration, including medications that BVH routinely allowed patients to bring from home, leading to ‘the potential for medication errors, drug overdose, adverse drug reactions, and ineffective medication management.’ ”

Robinson also wrote that Blue Valley Hospital’s leaders knew the facility wasn’t following federal rules and took extraordinary measures to try to pump up its patient load and average length of stay to get in compliance.

During the followup survey in April, two nurses told inspectors they rebelled after they were asked to falsify records to include complications that would justify keeping patients longer.

The chairman of the hospital’s board also told the inspectors the facility offered to absorb all out-of-pocket costs for employees and family members who medically qualified for a “gastric sleeve” surgery. According to inspection records, the chairman told inspectors it was something the staff had requested for years.

“Unfortunately, I have a lot of obese employees and they wanted this surgery,” the records quoted the chairman as saying. “So it was something that could help us both. We have done about 50-60 employee/family surgeries to date with about 70 more that want it.”

Robinson wrote that Blue Valley Hospital’s lawyers called the followup inspection “a sham” but didn’t provide any details to back that up.

Tideman didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the followup inspection Thursday.

Blue Valley Hospital officials have said that the loss of Medicare money could force it to close.

Federal attorneys essentially said that’s not the government’s problem, writing in a court filing that it “is the risk BVH has assumed in basing its entire business model on government reimbursement.”

Will Walgreen Pharmacists become more “uncomfortable” about filling controlled med Rxs ?

Kentucky sues Walgreens over opioid epidemic

http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/392309-kentucky-sues-walgreens-over-opioid-epidemic

Kentucky’s attorney general sued Walgreens Thursday, alleging that the company contributed to the state’s opioid epidemic.

Attorney General Andy Beshear, a Democrat, sued Walgreens for its role as both a distributor and a pharmacy. The lawsuit alleges that the company failed to report suspicious shipments of opioids to authorities and that it dispensed large quantities of the painkiller.

“As Attorney General, my job is to hold accountable anyone who harms our families,” Beshear said in a press release. “While Walgreens’ slogan was ‘at the corner of happy and healthy,’ they have significantly harmed the health of our families in fueling the opioid epidemic.”

Walgreens declined to comment because the subject is a matter of pending litigation.  

The company has over 70 locations in Kentucky, according to Beshear’s press release.

This is the sixth lawsuit Beshear has filed against companies in relation to the opioid epidemic, which is contributing to an estimated 115 American deaths per day. Other states have also been suing opioid distributors and manufacturers. Another new legal challenge was just filed on Wednesday, when Massachusetts sued Purdue Pharma and 16 current and former directors and executives.

On another legal track, hundreds of lawsuits from cities, counties and tribes have been consolidated in Cleveland, Ohio, where federal District Court Judge Dan Polster is aiming to “do something to dramatically reduce the number of opioids that are being disseminated, manufactured and distributed” and also “get some amount of money to the government agencies for treatment.”

Some opioid manufacturers and distributors have pushed back on the notion that they’re to blame for the opioid epidemic, and said they are working to be part of the solution.

What Pharmacists Want Physicians to Know

https://opmed.doximity.com/what-pharmacists-want-physicians-to-know-b52de53c09dd

Having worked as a retail pharmacist for 17 years, I have learned many tips that can help ease communication between doctor’s offices and pharmacies. Pharmacists are overworked and almost never have enough help, so when we call you, it’s not because we want to annoy you or waste your time. Here are some tips that will help you become every pharmacist’s favorite doctor.

Think Before You Prescribe That Opioid

With the opioid epidemic at crisis level, all healthcare professionals need to be more vigilant. Is the patient suffering with cancer pain, or is the patient coming back month after month for a prescription of a too-high dose of oxycodone that was originally given for a surgery one year ago? If that opioid is being prescribed in conjunction with a benzodiazepine, it’s time to start tapering. According to the FDA, combining these drugs comes with risks of “extreme sleepiness, respiratory depression, coma and death”

Insurance companies are starting to realize this and beginning to reject prescriptions, not only for the combination of benzodiazepine plus opioid, but often for high dose or quantity. Pharmacists and physicians need to work together to help these patients. Not only are patient’s lives at risk, our licenses are as well. Before you mindlessly send off another prescription, think — is this really needed? Can we start tapering? Does this patient exhibit signs of substance use disorder, and if so, what are the next steps? Have those difficult conversations with your patients.

It is also important to pay attention to the date on the prescription. Pharmacies are enforcing strict policies on filling/refilling of controlled/narcotic prescriptions. For example, if a patient fills a 30-day supply of oxycodone on June 1, the next due date would be July 1. Most pharmacies have policies to only fill these prescriptions a maximum of one or two days early. Filling a prescription 3 days early every month would supply the patient with an entire extra month of medication after just ten months. It is helpful when the doctor writes on the prescription (or in the comments of the electronic prescription) “Please fill on or after June 29,” as well as communicates this to the patient.

Also, please include a diagnosis code, especially with the larger quantities/dosages. ALWAYS write out the quantity. Once, I had a patient change #10 to #60. I asked, “Did you change the number?” and he admitted it. It is best when you write the number in parenthesis too, i.e., #60 (SIXTY). And never forget to sign and date the prescription, and be sure your DEA and NPI are on the prescription.

Always Check Allergies

I can’t even tell you the number of times a patient comes in with a prescription for an antibiotic they are allergic too. In fact, I have even had the same patient with a penicillin allergy come in with a prescription for amoxicillin three different times in one year, and each time I had to call and have it changed. Not only does it tie up the pharmacist and inconvenience the doctor, but the patient who is feeling sick is the one who has to wait. A quick question (and updating the electronic record), before prescribing an antibiotic will save everyone a lot of time!

Be Dedicated to the Pharmacy

My favorite doctor’s office has an extremely efficient nurse, Julie. She knows that the doctor will not reply to electronic refill requests in a timely manner, so she asks pharmacies to change the preferred contact method to fax, where she is able to quickly return our faxes. You can check here get better faxing solutions.

Figure out the best way to address prescription refills. Have a staff member assigned to taking care of refills by phone, fax, voicemail. We like to take care of our patients and keep them happy and taking days to reply to a request for a maintenance medication is frustrating for the patient and pharmacy.

Also, train your staff to always check with you on pharmacy questions. Sometimes electronic prescriptions come over with crazy directions such as “Take 25 tablets daily.” The most annoying thing is when we call to clarify, and the person answering the phone says, “Well, that’s what the doctor said, so it’s correct.” No, it’s not.

Also, on the topic of electronic prescriptions, never tell a patient, “I sent it over, it will be ready when you get there.” Sometimes, especially during busy hours, prescriptions can take up to an hour to arrive. Pharmacies are processing many other prescriptions at the same time, and someone who doesn’t work at the pharmacy is not equipped to tell the patient when their prescription will be ready (although we will be glad to tell the patients that they don’t have to wait when they come to your office, ha-ha!)

Also, please do not tell the patient how much a prescription will cost. You don’t know, we don’t even know until we process the prescription with the insurance card.

Speaking of insurance, pharmacists also do not like prior authorizations. We don’t send them to annoy you, as some doctors think we do. So, when you get a prior authorization request, have that dedicated staff person (better yet, if you have a busy office and the budget to do so, hire a part time pharmacist to handle your prior authorizations!) either take care of it in a timely manner, or consult with you about changing the medication to something that is covered. Whatever you do, we just want the patient to get the medication that they need, in a reasonable amount of time.

Use the Comment Section

On electronic prescriptions, we love when doctors use the comment section to clarify something that may raise a question. For example, say your patient went from atorvastatin 10 mg to atorvastatin 80 mg. Since it wasn’t a small increase to the next dose, most pharmacists would probably call the doctor’s office to see if it was an intentional increase or an error. If you make a dosage adjustment it always helps to make a short note in the comments: “note- dosage increase from 10 to 80”

Or, say you’re aware of a drug interaction but you have already discussed it with the patient — if you put a note in the comments such as “patient will hold warfarin while on fluconazole” this will save us all a lot of time.

Be Friendly!

Being friendly doesn’t cost anything. We are all swamped in our respective professions and dealing with different challenges. And feel free to ask our recommendations on anything pharmacy related, that’s what we are here for.

Karen Berger, PharmD, graduated from the University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy in 2001. After working many years in chain pharmacies, she currently enjoys working as a pharmacist at an independent pharmacy.

The paragraphs gives a good insight into the minds of some pharmacists working in community pharmacy…  pt taking a opiate a year after surgery… should be tapered.. I guess that this pharmacist has never hear of failed back surgery – where the pt’s pain is worse after the surgery  than before… never heard of a pt having a nerve severed during surgery and the pt becomes a chronic pain pt.

START TAPERING if the pt has been taking a opiate and benzo together… apparently some pharmacists believe that when the FDA states that the combination of the two MAY COME WITH SOME RISKS… does not mean that every pt is going to experience ..extreme sleepiness, respiratory depression, coma and deaththe word MAY… SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED as WILL… Should you taper pts that have been taking these two in combination for some time without any serious side effects when only a few pts could experiences these side effects..  OF COURSE NOT…  a “good pharmacist” will have a conversation with the pt about the side effects – they may experience if a new pt – or talk to the pt that has been on them for a while to see if they noticed any side effects and you make notes in their medical records in the pharmacy computer system..  the pharmacist license is seldom at risk if they do proper counseling and documenting in the pt’s notes.

Here is the simple math question you could have gotten in grade school.. if a pt gets 3 extra days every month …how many  months does it take for them to have a extra month’s supply ? Of course, you must assume that the prescriber knows exactly the intensity of the pt’s pain every day of every month and prescribe an amount to take care of that potentially highly variable intensity that all chronic pain pts experience.

Those ICD10 codes can be troublesome… I consider myself a fairly healthy 71 y/o and I recently got paperwork after seeing my prescriber and included on the paperwork was all the ICD10 codes that apply to me – ALL THIRTY OF THEM…  How many pts are comfortable with a pharmacists knowing all the ICD10 on their medical records ?… what if the prescriber picks 1-2 ICD10 codes and puts them on the Rx and the pharmacist is not “satisfied” with the ICD10 codes and the medication prescribed ?

Pharmacist need to start talking to pts.. have a “conversation”… quit practicing pharmacy “by the numbers” … and quit interpreting all “MAY HAPPEN” to “WILL HAPPEN” and making absolute decisions about appropriate therapy.

Pts who encounter those type of pharmacists …need to find themselves a new pharmacy and pharmacist… of course, my normal recommendation is a INDEPENDENT PHARMACY …

Kolodny: has advised members of both political parties on opioid policy

What Do These Political Ads Have in Common? The Opioid Crisis.

www.nytimes.com/2018/06/07/us/opioid-ads-democrats-republicans.html

The scenes in the political ads play out in almost the same order: A heartbreaking story about someone who can’t seem to stop taking drugs. A grim statistic about opioids. And then a somber pitch from a candidate promising solutions.

More and more, politicians in competitive races are using emotional pleas about opioid abuse to woo voters. In states like Wisconsin, where hundreds of people are dying of opioid overdoses every year, candidates are talking about drugs in stump speeches, on Facebook and in ads.

The opioid fight has become a shared talking point for Democrats and Republicans, who discuss the crisis using startlingly similar language and often vote together to pass bills.

On Thursday, President Trump’s administration announced a series of public service announcements that aim to warn young adults about the dangers of opioid abuse. In one ad, a young woman says she intentionally crashed her car to get more opioids; in another, a man recounts breaking his arm to get another prescription. The videos all include the line, “Opioid dependence can happen after just five days.”

Know the truth | Chris’ Story | OpioidsCreditVideo by truthorange

Historically, Republicans have taken a law enforcement-first approach to drug crises, while Democrats have focused on treatment and prevention. Some sharp partisan divisions still exist over the best approach to the opioid crisis, including on Mr. Trump’s call for the death penalty for drug dealers and a wall along the border with Mexico to keep drugs out of the country. And some Democrats have moved to spend more on treatment, including a bill in Congress that calls for spending $100 million on opioid resources each year.

But with overdoses ravaging Republican and Democratic strongholds alike, members of both parties have found broad areas of agreement, a rarity in today’s politics.

“This is really a unique issue where there’s tremendous amounts of overlap,” said Dr. Andrew Kolodny, a Brandeis University researcher who has advised members of both parties on opioid policy, and is himself a physician who treats opioid addiction.

Here’s a look at how some candidates are talking about opioids:

Illinois

Brendan Kelly | JenniferCreditVideo by Brendan Kelly

The candidate: Brendan Kelly, Democratic nominee for Congress. Mr. Kelly, a county prosecutor, is seeking to unseat Representative Mike Bost, a two-term Republican, in a Southern Illinois race that could help determine control of the House.

The ad: In an ad that runs for nearly two minutes, a mother recounts her daughter’s addiction to Vicodin and her death in 2012. “Giving her them pills when she first was prescribed all that was the loaded gun,” the mother says.

Opioids in the region: Between January and August of 2017, 36 people died of overdoses in St. Clair County, where Mr. Kelly is prosecutor.

The candidate’s record on opioids: Mr. Kelly is one of many city and county officials to sue drug companies that make opioids.

Wisconsin

To Save LivesCreditVideo by Scott Walker

The candidate: Gov. Scott Walker, Republican. Mr. Walker, a two-term governor running for re-election, has cautioned Republicans not to underestimate Democrats in November. At one point, he said on Twitter that the state was “at risk of a #BlueWave.

The ad: “Tyler was only 80 pounds,” the mother of a recovering addict says. “I had his funeral planned.”

Opioids in the region: Wisconsin had 865 fatal opioid overdoses in 2016, and had a death rate higher than the national average.

The candidate’s record on opioids: Last year, Mr. Walker called a special legislative session on opioids and signed bills providing more funding for treatment and law enforcement. Democrats have criticized Mr. Walker for accepting donations from people with ties to pharmaceutical companies.

Wisconsin

KnockCreditVideo by Tammy Baldwin

The candidate: Senator Tammy Baldwin, Democrat. Ms. Baldwin’s seat is one of 10 that Democrats are defending this year in states that Mr. Trump carried in 2016. Republicans are spending heavily to try to defeat her.

The ad: Ms. Baldwin describes coming home from school as a child to find her mother passed out. “My mother had a drug abuse problem,” Ms. Baldwin says in the ad. “I had to grow up fast. Very fast.”

Opioids in the region: Emergency room visits for opioid overdoses increased 109 percent between mid-2016 and mid-2017 in Wisconsin. “I felt strongly that I needed to add my story to help fight the stigma and to help let fellow Wisconsinites know that I’ve been there,” Ms. Baldwin said in an interview.

The candidate’s record on opioids: Ms. Baldwin helped bring federal funds to Wisconsin to fight opioids, but has also faced criticism for her response to a scandal at a Veterans Affairs hospital in her state, in which some patients were overprescribed opioids.

West Virginia

Who Does Patrick Morrisey Really Represent?CreditVideo by Don Blankenship for U.S. Senate

The candidate: Don Blankenship, candidate for Senate. Mr. Blankenship, a businessman and convicted criminal, lost the Republican primary to Patrick Morrisey, West Virginia’s attorney general, but later said he would run as a third-party candidate. Both men are seeking to unseat Senator Joe Manchin III, a Democrat, in November.

The ad: Mr. Blankenship uses clips from a CBS News report on Mr. Morrisey’s financial and business ties to the pharmaceutical industry. A narrator notes that Mr. Morrisey “is in charge of prosecuting these drug companies.”

Opioids in the region: In 2016, West Virginia had the highest drug overdose death rate in the country. A Fox News poll conducted in April found that Republican primary voters there rated the opioid crisis as the most important issue facing the country.

The candidate’s record on opioids: Mr. Morrisey has negotiated settlements with opioid distributors, including $20 million from Cardinal Health.

DEA change may have caused illicit sales of prescription opioids to increase

The DEA Tightened the Rules for Legal Opioid Sales. Did That Drive the Market to the Dark Web?

https://psmag.com/news/the-dea-tightened-the-rules-for-legal-opioid-sales-did-that-drive-the-market-to-the-dark-web

After the 2014 rule change, sales of prescription painkillers went up among U.S. sellers on dark Web marketplaces.
Prescription opioid sales in the U.S. spiked on the dark Web after it became harder for patients to obtain prescriptions for them.

Prescription opioid sales in the U.S. spiked on the dark Web after it became harder for patients to obtain prescriptions for them.

(Image: Kev-Shine/Flickr)

In 2013, more than 16,000 Americans overdosed and died with prescription painkillers in their systems. That number would grow in the years to come, but already it was alarming, more than 400 percent higher than the same statistic for the year 1999.

And so, in October of 2014, the Drug Enforcement Administration changed its policies around some of the most commonly prescribed opioids—including Vicodin and Lortab—making it more difficult for doctors to prescribe them and for patients to get refills. Almost immediately, prescriptions went down. But did the policy change have unwanted consequences too?

In a new study, a team of social scientists finds evidence that the DEA change may have caused illicit sales of prescription opioids to increase instead. The study is an important look at whether a policy aimed at reducing the drug supply works to lower drug use—an area that’s understudied, as one pair of researchers recently argued. (More often, scientists study tactics aimed at reducing demand, such as anti-drug campaigns.)

The new research, published Wednesday in the journal BMJ, can’t prove cause. It’s possible that pill demand grew for other, unrelated reasons. Still, the researchers found a few reasons to believe the DEA policy contributed: During the same time frame, sales of other drugs on the dark Web sites that the scientists analyzed didn’t go up, and pill sales only went up among sellers in United States, not in other countries.

To conduct the study, four researchers from Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada deployed software called DATACRYPTO on 31 of the world’s largest dark Web marketplaces operating immediately before and after the DEA enforcement change. Dark Web marketplaces are encrypted websites where people can anonymously buy illegal material, including drugs and unlicensed guns. DATACRYPTO crawled these sites, harvesting data on what types of drugs were on offer, the drugs’ countries of origin, and the number of customer comments on each seller’s page, which researchers used as a proxy for how much product that seller sold. The research team looked at sales of prescription opioids, sedatives, stimulants, and steroids, as well as heroin. The only statistically significant change in sales they found immediately after 2014 was of prescription opioids sold in the U.S.

The U.S. government knows that a certain slice of Americans get their drugs online. In January, the Department of Justice announced the creation of a unit dedicated to taking down dark Web opioid and cocaine sellers; in April, it announced the unit’s first arrests. How such enforcement will affect the overall market and drug use in the U.S. remains to be seen.

B.C. doctors can’t limit opioids or discriminate against pain patients: college

B.C. doctors can’t limit opioids or discriminate against pain patients: college

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-bc-doctors-cant-limit-opioids-or-discriminate-against-pain-patients-2/

British Columbia doctors treating patients with chronic pain will be required to prescribe opioids without limiting dosage or refusing to see patients who are on the medication that has come to be associated with illicit overdose deaths.

In revising an existing standard of practice, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of B.C. provided more clarity to doctors about their obligation to treat patients through proper assessments and documented discussions about dosage, tapering and stopping the drugs if necessary, college registrar Heidi Oetter said.

The new requirements, yet to be introduced to physicians, update a June 2016 standard that replaced national guidelines offering only recommendations and meant B.C. physicians became the first in Canada to face mandatory regulations involving prescription opioids.

The original standard was set after B.C. declared a public health emergency in April 2016 over of a spike in overdose deaths, mostly involving the powerful painkiller fentanyl being cut into street drugs. The province still has the highest number of overdose fatalities in Canada, with 1,448 deaths recorded last year.

Oetter said the standard was revised after widespread consultation of doctors in the province and patient advocacy groups that had complained people were being denied care or abandoned because they were on opioids.

“Physicians cannot exclude or dismiss patients from their practice because they have used or are currently using opioids. It’s really a violation of the human rights code and it’s certainly discrimination and that’s not acceptable or ethical practice.”

The college previously referenced a national guideline calling on doctors to cap dosages of drugs such as hydromorphone, oxycodone and the fentanyl patch to the equivalent of 90 milligrams of morphine per day, but physicians must now work with patients to decide appropriate dosages.

“Hopefully it’s clear to physicians that the college is really expecting that they exercise good professional discretion, that they are really engaging patients in informed consent discussions and that patients are really aware of the potential risks that are associated with opioids, particularly if they’re taking them in conjunction with alcohol or sedatives,” Oetter said.

Andrew Koster, who suffers from debilitating lower back pain from a type of arthritis called ankylosing spondylitis, said the 2016 provincial declaration created an “opioid chill” that had some doctors trying to get people off opioids or taper them too quickly.

Andrew Koster, pictured at his Victoria home, takes opioids for his chronic pain.

CHAD HIPOLITO/The Canadian Press

Koster, 65, said his doctor rebuffed his efforts to discuss transitioning to different opioids because the ones he’d been taking for eight years were no longer effective.

“He basically walked out on me while I was in the middle of explaining that I was having trouble managing my pain with the set of prescriptions that I had,” Koster said, adding he’d had the same doctor for 15 years but was forced to switch to another physician after the college introduced its original opioid-prescribing standard.

“The whole tone of the public health crisis, combined with these new regulations, made us very afraid that we were going to be forced off opioids because there was a provincial, and now national, health scare.”

He said patients felt stigmatized for taking medication they needed.

“I’ve had awful experiences that I’ll never forget,” he said of his efforts to get help from doctors who believed he was seeking drugs. “I’ve been kicked out of emergency rooms and told not to come back, with my back seized up.”

Koster said his new doctor helped him taper off opioids and reduce the dosage by half over eight months.

“The question in the minds of the general public is that opioids are bad, we’ve got to stop the opioid crisis. Now, the pendulum has swung the other way, I believe, so there’s a separation between what’s going on the street, as tragic as it is, and what’s going on with patients. There is sort of a fire wall developing.”

However, the standard still advises doctors to suggest alternative treatments such as physiotherapy, which aren’t covered by the public health-care system and can be unaffordable for people who do not have private plans.

Maria Hudspith, executive director of the patient advocacy group Pain BC, said the old standard was driven by doctors’ concerns about overprescribing even though coroners’ data have shown that tainted street drugs were behind most of the deaths.

“The bigger concern that we heard from physicians was that they were fearful of sanctioning by the college or disciplinary action of some kind,” she said, adding the college must ensure it enforces its new standard.

“This is a legal standard and we’re waiting to see them superficially take action in cases where patients have been harmed.”

Burlington to Ease Access to Opioid Addiction Medication

https://www.sevendaysvt.com/vermont/burlington-to-ease-access-to-opioid-addiction-medication/Content?oid=16884183

Gregory Shaw was spending $40 a day to buy addiction meds on the street as he waited to start opioid treatment at Rutland’s West Ridge Center. When a dealer offered him cocaine instead, the 35-year-old, who had been out on probation, took it — a decision that ultimately landed him back in prison.

Shaw was told he’d remain behind bars for an entire year, dashing his hopes of rebuilding a normal life. “So instead here I sit … with no treatment or help of any kind,” he wrote in an email to Seven Days.

Stories like Shaw’s are driving a new effort in Burlington that will give users same-day access to buprenorphine, the opioid addiction medication that Shaw was buying on the street. Officials have decided it’s too risky to make people who are addicted to a deadly drug wait even a few days for treatment.

As part of the program’s unveiling, Chittenden County State’s Attorney Sarah George is announcing that her office won’t prosecute anyone for possessing the prescription drug illegally. Her conclusion: It’s safer for someone to self-medicate than not to take the medication at all.

“That is a huge, huge step,” said Tom Dalton, executive director of Vermonters for Criminal Justice Reform. “It’s a paradigm shift.”

Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, the director of Johns Hopkins University’s Bloomberg American Health Initiative, said the effort would make Burlington “one of a handful of cities really trying to get treatment right to the point of impact.”

Last week, George, Burlington Mayor Miro Weinberger, Police Chief Brandon del Pozo, emergency room physician Dr. Stephen Leffler and four other key players sat down with Seven Days to share the details of the program, which is scheduled to start in August.

“This strategy,” the mayor said, “is very focused on keeping people from dying.”

While Vermont has done more than most states to address the opioid crisis, it hasn’t managed to bring down its death toll. According to the Vermont Department of Health, 107 people died of opioid-related overdoses in 2017, one more than in the previous year; 75 people died in 2015. The department estimates that fewer than 8,000 of the estimated 20,000 to 30,000 people addicted to opioids are receiving treatment.

Part of the problem was a years-long waiting list for medication-assisted treatment. But in September 2017, Vermont officials triumphantly announced that the state had eliminated all waiting lists at its regional treatment clinics (known as “hubs” of the system) by training more doctors (the “spokes”) to treat addiction.

But, as Weinberger clarified last week, “The fact that there is no waiting list does not mean that there is no wait.”

When someone seeks treatment, it often takes two weeks to get the first dose of medication. The clinics have the capacity to take on new clients but can’t always do so immediately because of scheduling challenges, explained Bob Bick, chief executive officer of the Howard Center, Vermont’s largest substance abuse treatment provider. Incoming patients must complete an initial screening and an in-person assessment before getting a prescription.

In the meantime, they’ll likely inject heroin — or the vastly more potent fentanyl — every six to eight hours. Some of these users overdose and end up at the University of Vermont Medical Center emergency room.

“We resuscitate them. We watch them for four to six hours to make sure that the full effects of whatever brought them to the ER have worn off,” said Leffler, who is the chief population health and quality officer for the UVM Health Network. “They usually hate staying that long … We typically try to refer them into therapy, but … when we tell them, ‘We think you can probably start therapy within two weeks,’ that’s just a complete nonstarter.”

Beginning in August, the UVM Medical Center will become the first hospital in Vermont to offer buprenorphine in its emergency room and one of a small number of hospitals doing so nationally. Those who overdose will be able to leave the hospital with a three-day buprenorphine prescription and a guarantee that they can get ongoing treatment, or a refill, after the last dose. The medication is meant to act as a bridge, keeping patients off heroin while the hospital works with the Howard Center to line up a permanent treatment plan.

Six emergency room doctors have already been through an eight-hour tutorial to better understand the pharmacology of the drug and the regulations around it. The hospital is planning to train six more, which would allow it to have a prescriber on-hand 24-7.

“It’s a philosophical change,” Leffler said. “We’re going to manage this as a chronic illness like diabetes and hypertension. We don’t send people home without medicines.”

The Howard Center is also preparing to provide buprenorphine prescriptions at Safe Recovery, Vermont’s largest syringe exchange and the only one in the state that’s open 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. Located in a modest house in the city’s Old North End, the exchange last year served 1,338 clients from every county in the state and got 228 of them into treatment.

Safe Recovery program coordinator Grace Keller said the facility is looking to hire a medical professional who can prescribe buprenorphine. The strategy mirrors the hospital’s: Give people a short-term prescription and then get them into longer-term treatment in a clinic or a doctor’s office.

“We really need to meet these clients where they are and make treatment as easily available to them as possible,” Keller said. “We find the hardest thing for people is that first step. It’s making that first step easier.”

The cost of the program will be minimal — just $150,000 in the first year, according to Weinberger, who said the city expects to seek funds from state and local sources.

The mayor and his partners aren’t concerned about people trying to game the new system. “There would be no reason ever to withhold these pills from somebody, because we know taking buprenorphine is much safer than using heroin or fentanyl,” Leffler said.

Approved by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration in 2002, buprenorphine, also known by the commercial name Suboxone, is an opioid that mitigates heroin withdrawal symptoms and cravings. It comes as a pill or dissolvable strip, and any doctor who completes the federally required eight-hour training can prescribe it — unlike methadone, an older opioid addiction medication that must be dispensed at a clinic.

Buprenorphine is considered very safe, and overdoses on it are extremely rare. But the medication isn’t universally embraced. It’s a mild opioid and can be abused, leading skeptics to conclude that the medication simply supplants one drug for another.

Addiction specialists have worked hard to dispel that notion, pointing to the many studies that show that both buprenorphine and methadone are the most effective treatments for opioid addiction. People taking the medications are less likely to relapse than those who stop taking opioids altogether.

“We don’t want to purport that this strategy will solve the opioid crisis,” said del Pozo, the police chief. Comparing the approach to the distribution of condoms during the AIDS crisis or bottled water during a cholera outbreak, he made the case that it “isn’t the lasting solution, but it stops the spread of infection and keeps people alive.”

Unlike water or condoms, though, buprenorphine is a drug that’s illegal without a prescription, making this particular effort a bit more complicated. The drug is sometimes “diverted,” meaning that someone with a prescription sells or gives it to someone without one.

Crucially, both del Pozo and George have decided to embrace the fact that there’s an active black market for buprenorphine. Because the prescription drug is more expensive than heroin and because it generally won’t get an opioid addict high, they suggested that most street buyers are trying to stay clean.

“I believe we need to be encouraging diversion,” George said. In other words, she won’t prosecute buprenorphine cases. That decision should discourage police from arresting and charging people in the first place.

Del Pozo is on board. “Buprenorphine out there being ingested by someone who would otherwise be addicted to heroin is a plus, even if it’s a result of diversion,” said the police chief. “We’re not gonna charge it. We’re not gonna ask where they got it from.”

The new policy will have a profound impact, according to Dalton of Vermonters for Criminal Justice Reform. Opioid users will be more inclined to choose buprenorphine over heroin when they know with certainty that taking the former won’t land them in prison, he reasoned.

Ironically, while top law enforcement officials are willing to overlook criminal activity in the interest of public health, the Vermont Department of Health appears reluctant to embrace their approach.

Tony Folland, manager of clinical services for the department’s Division of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Programs, said he wasn’t familiar with the details of the Burlington initiative, but he suggested it’s still important to discourage the misuse of medications.

While buprenorphine is a highly effective medication for people battling addiction, Folland asserted that “there is another subset of people who are using this, as they would any other narcotic, to get high.” He also noted that the state has rules for prescribing buprenorphine, which require that doctors take steps to minimize the possibility that the drug is diverted.

Weinberger acknowledged that the effort to make buprenorphine widely available could make it more likely that nonusers encounter the medication and develop an addiction. But, he added, “We think that is going to be a very rare circumstance.”

There’s a simple metric by which Vermont can measure whether the new approach is working, according to del Pozo, who said matter-of-factly: “Fewer people dying.”

 

Cases of elder abuse bury state agencies — 400 reports of elder abuse, neglect and exploitation every week.

http://www.postbulletin.com/news/local/cases-of-elder-abuse-bury-state-agencies/article_3c275144-6a8f-11e8-908e-279764df3035.html

The Minnesota Department of Health receives about 400 reports of elder abuse, neglect and exploitation every week.

Late last year, the department was buried in a backlog of more than 2,000 reports of abuse at healthcare facilities. Health department officials say they have since caught up, thanks to help from the Department of Human Services and from switching from a paper processing system to an electronic one.

“We’ve made a ton of impressive progress,” MDH Commissioner Jan Malcolm said. “But, we’re a long way from where we need to be.”

In cases where neglect or abuse occurs at a healthcare facility, reports are initially referred to the Minnesota Department of Health. The department reviews the case to determine if it has merit. If it does, they begin proceedings against the care center. Cases going to criminal court are rare.

“Even in situations where (the Minnesota Department of Health) could substantially prove what the conduct was, that doesn’t mean it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt,” Olmsted County Attorney Mark Ostrem said.

Help from the Department of Human Services will phase out by the end of the year, but Malcolm said the health department can begin filling some vacancies now that they have new procedures in place to handle reports.

Malcolm said although they have better procedures in place to process complaints individually, they lack a system to track trends and analyze the data.

“It’s just a front-end document system,” she said. “There’s a ton of information in our system that isn’t being used.”

While handling and analyzing reports of abuse and neglect is an important short-term goal, Malcolm acknowledged more needs to be done to address the root causes that trigger those reports.

Elder care-related provisions in the Legislature’s omnibus supplemental budget bill fell short in protecting people in care facilities, said Kris Sundberg, president of Elder Voice Family Advocates.

Before the session convened, Gov. Mark Dayton had called for a standalone bill that would address elder care abuse and regulation. A bill from the senate that outlined facility monitoring, required licensure of assisted living facilities and other provisions never made it to the floor of the House.

“We got caught in the midst of political gamesmanship,” Sandberg said.

Malcolm said she, too, was disappointed a standalone bill wasn’t presented to the governor. She also acknowledged the challenges the care industry faces with caps on state and federal funding for facilities.

“We need a long-term fix,” she said.

CMS Roadmap TO ADDRESS THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC

https://www.cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/Emergency/Downloads/Opioid-epidemic-roadmap.pdf

 

Could only get  *.PDF… click on link above to read 🙁

 

The insane crackdown on pain medication

https://nypost.com/2018/05/24/the-insane-crackdown-on-pain-medication/

If you have chronic, agonizing pain, your troubles are about to get worse. New state and federal regulations will make it nearly impossible to get the prescription painkillers you need.

Grandstanding politicians are imposing one-size-fits-all limits on how much medication patients can receive and for how long.

Pols claim they’re combating the opioid crisis, but these draconian limits will harm millions with chronic pain and do zip to curb overdose deaths. Before the 1990s, pain was frequently under-treated, and patients suffered horribly. Since then, doctors have been trained to routinely ask patients about their pain and treat it.

Now, politicians are undoing that progress. Patients will be forced to tough it out again.

Seniors on Medicare get harmed the most. New Medicare regulations will refuse to pay for high-dose, long-term prescriptions for chronic-pain sufferers starting Jan. 1, 2019, with only a few exceptions, such as cancer patients.

Never mind that this age group is the least likely to overdose. And never mind that some 1.6 million seniors on Medicare Part D will be affected. Facts be damned.

Politicians parrot a false narrative that millions of people are becoming drug addicts because of prescriptions their doctor gave them for pain.

Not true. Emergency-room records reveal that very few overdose victims were being treated by a doctor for chronic pain, according to the Journal of the American Medical Association–Internal Medicine. That’s not how they got hooked.

True, there are doctors who unscrupulously operate pill mills, dispensing prescriptions to anyone who asks, but those bad apples are not causing the tragic surge in overdose deaths. Only about 1 percent of patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain become addicted — according to a systematic survey of peer-reviewed medical studies. Even 1 percent is too much, but it doesn’t justify harming millions of patients who need pain relief.

Politicians should be battling dealers, not doctors. Illegal drugs cause nearly all overdose deaths, not drugs patients get from their doctor. Fentanyl (a man-made heroin-like drug), heroin and cocaine play the biggest roles in overdose deaths in New York City, according to the city’s health data. Fewer than one in five overdose victims even had a prescription drug in their system, and it was virtually never the only drug.

Yet Mayor Bill de Blasio wrongly blames the city’s overdose death toll on prescription painkillers.

Nationwide also, fentanyl poses the biggest threat. Overdose deaths from fentanyl and other manmade street drugs soared 100 percent in one year, while overdoses linked to prescription opioids hardly increased or in many areas declined.

Patient advocates are alarmed at the new laws and regulations limiting what their doctors can prescribe. Nearly half the states, including New York, Connecticut and New Jersey, have acted. Though many limit only prescriptions for short-term pain relief, not chronic pain, they’re having a chilling impact. Doctors fear legal trouble, and are cutting off patients. Some of these turned-away patients, like 52-year-old bed-ridden Debra Bales, who had taken painkillers for years, resort to suicide in desperation.

Ohio Gov. John Kasich boasts that his state will erect new hurdles before a doctor can prescribe an opioid painkiller. Doesn’t Kasich know that prescription-opioid overdoses are at a six-year low in his state, while deaths from heroin and other illicit drugs are soaring? Target the real problem, governor.

Good advice for de Blasio, the ultimate grandstander. He’s brandishing a lawsuit against pharmaceutical companies and boasts millions in new spending on the opioid crisis, but refuses to put any of that money into law enforcement.

That’s a mistake. The facts behind overdose deaths show the city should be clamping down on the pushing and shooting up going on in plain sight in parks and public places. Nationwide, pols should be going after dealers instead of seniors and other chronic-pain sufferers who use, but do not abuse, meds.

Betsy McCaughey is a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research.