Texas commissioners: Mail order prescription is on average $29.09 more each Rx

Texas commissioners: Mail order prescription is more expensive

https://www.ncpanet.org/newsroom/qam/2019/12/17/texas-commissioners-mail-order-is-more-expensive

Commissioners in Collin County, Texas, had long incentivized their employees to use mail order, and even limited 90-day fills to mail order. After extensive analysis, they found that

most prescription drugs were more expensive under mail order, $29.09 more expensive per script.

That is before considering that the county paid for the third month’s fill and delivery fees. Commissioners recently changed their policy so county employees could get 90-day fills at retail and removed all incentives for employees to use mail order. County employees now have a choice. Here’s a video of the commissioners’ discussion on employee benefits for 2020 here

Fewer SUICIDES… more “deaths of despair” ?

There are fewer suicides related to opioids than previously believed, research says

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/17/health/opioid-overdose-death-suicide-study/index.html

Since 1999, significant increases in US suicide rates have paralleled increases in drug overdoses from opioids. Experts have wondered how much the two might be intertwined, estimating that the

percent of suicides among opioid overdose deaths to be as high as 20% to 30%.

But a new analysis of numbers finds that the link between opioids and suicide might be much smaller than initially believed.
The percent of opioid-related suicides actually fell in recent years, dropping from 9% in 2000 to 4% in 2017, according to a research letter published Tuesday in the medical journal JAMA.
“It gives you a very different picture of the role of opioids in the suicide epidemic,” said Dr. Mark Olfson, lead author of the analysis and a professor of psychiatry at Columbia University Medical Center.
The conversation around “deaths of despair” — deaths related to suicide, drug overdose, liver disease and cirrhosis — has taken on a specific narrative, Olfson said, intertwining the opioid epidemic and suicide.

Deaths of despair

The phrase “deaths of despair” was coined by the Princeton-based economists Sir Angus Deaton and Anne Case. They were among the first to note these deaths have increased significantly in the United States since the 1990s, particularly among white males.

Increases in these “deaths of despair” have been so significant in recent years, that they are major drivers in reducing American life expectancy.

Deaton and Case noted that while the supply of opioids increased since 1999, it’s not the “fundamental factor” behind increased mortality, but rather, the prescription of opioids for chronic pain “added fuel to the flames” of overall mortality.
A report issued in September from the US Congress Joint Economic Committee titled “Long-Term Trends in Deaths of Despair” noted, “Mortality from deaths of despair far surpasses anything seen in America since the dawn of the 20th century. …The recent increase has primarily been driven by an unprecedented epidemic of drug overdoses.”

Opioids and suicide not as closely tied as believed

“There’s been a tendency as seeing opioid overdose and suicide as this one thing,” said Olfson, “but when you look at the deaths, they aren’t tied as strongly as we had imagined. “
Asking for help

The suicide rate in the United States has seen sharp increases in recent years. Studies have shown that the risk of suicide declines sharply when people call the national suicide hotline: 1-800-273-TALK.

There is also a crisis text line. For crisis support in Spanish, call 1-888-628-9454.

The lines are staffed by a mix of paid professionals and unpaid volunteers trained in crisis and suicide intervention. The confidential environment, the 24-hour accessibility, a caller’s ability to hang up at any time and the person-centered care have helped its success, advocates say.

Olfson and his colleagues analyzed mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System from 2000 to 2017, looking specifically at unintentional or accidental deaths, suicides and deaths of undetermined cause, and tallying those associated with opioids.

The proportion of opioid-related deaths related to suicide dropped from from 9% in 2000 to 4% in 2017. But, despite that decrease, researchers noted that between 2000 and 2017, the rate of opioid-related suicides actually increased in that same time frame. In 2000, there were 0.27 opioid-related suicides per 100,000 people. In 2017, that rate increased to 0.58 opioid-related suicides per 100,000 people.
Increases in opioid-related suicide rates were observed for males, females, all racial and ethnic groups, as well as all age groups — except for those between the ages of 35 and 44.

The emergence of fentanyl

Olfson believes the introduction of lethal and illicit fentanyl is a factor driving the drop in proportion of opioid-related suicides, even as the rate increased.
Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that can be up to 50 times as potent as heroin. Overall fatal drug overdoses related to fentanyl skyrocketed more than 1,000% between 2011 and 2016. There were 70,237 fatal drug overdoses in 2017 and about 40% of them involved synthetic drugs such as fentanyl.
When looking at overall opioid-related deaths, the proportion of people accidentally dying from opioid overdose has increased significantly because of the power of fentanyl.
“It has it has contributed to a larger share of the deaths being accidental. So, in a way, it’s sort of crowding out the intentional deaths,” Olfson said.
Get CNN Health’s weekly newsletter
But Olfson was careful to note that this didn’t mean that researcher and health care providers shouldn’t be concerned about opioids and suicide.
“You can’t take your eye off of this — it just changes the view and our understanding,” he said.

DEA’S logic: how Rx opiates causes/linked to OD’s

DEA Obtusely Uses High School Wrestler‘s Death To Promote Anti-Drug Website

https://stockdailydish.com/dea-obtusely-uses-high-school-wrestlers-death-to-promote-anti-drug-website/

a high school wrestler who started taking Oxycodone as a senior. His doctor prescribed it to him after a shoulder injury that ended his wrestling career. At 21, he died from a fentanyl overdose. It is adviced for Yakima wrongful death lawyers for hire , if they need to fight for wrongful death or wrongful injury cases. 

That these two things are related is all but a foregone conclusion. In 2015, the same year Gintis died, 52,000 Americans died of an overdose. In two-thirds of those cases, the drugs were opioids. The connection between high school athletics and prescriptions to potential gateway drugs like Oxycodone or Ocycontin is understudied but increasingly .

Tessie Castillo, the advocacy and communications coordinator for the North Carolina Harm Reduction Coalition, believes Gintis was a victim of this connection. “What we see a lot, over and over again, is people getting injured and they go to the doctor and they’re prescribed pills and that’s the start of their addiction,” she told Yahoo. “It’s very connected to sports.”

Gintis’s mother, Marsha, seems to agree. She recently spoke at the North Carolina state legislature on behalf of the STOP act, targeting the over-prescription of pain killers. In recounting Gintis’s story she said, “Like so many others who now struggle with substance-abuse disorders, a prescription for opioids after suffering an athletic injury served as the catalyst for his downward spiral and ultimately his death.”Death cannot be compensated. However, the injury lawyers – The Rizzuto Law Firm can help you get anything you deserve if you or your loved ones suffered an injury.

In this context, it’s weird to see the DEA latching onto the story with this tweet:

The DEA is quote-tweeting its own affiliate account—one that pays lip service to drug prevention and does mention the wrestling injury—to unsuccessfully (their typo’d link leads to an unsecure site) promote It’s just a tweet, but it manages to be insensitive and ignorant at the same time. Blaming Gintis’s death on a one-time decision to take up drugs ignores the greater context of his tragedy, and oversimplifies a growing epidemic in ways that only make it harder to properly understand and deal with it.

More opiate crisis lawsuits being filed

Michigan sues Walgreens, other drug companies for causing opioid crisis

https://www.freep.com/story/news/health/2019/12/17/michigan-walgreens-opioid-drug-companies/2674106001/

The state of Michigan Tuesday filed a lawsuit against drug companies for damages caused by the opioid epidemic.

The suit, filed in Wayne County Circuit Court, charges McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, and Walgreens with creating the opioid epidemic by flooding the market with prescription pain pills and for selling the drugs without oversight, causing them to be easily diverted for illegal use.

Michigan is the first state in the nation to sue drug companies as drug dealers, according to the office of Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel. Tuesday’s suit was filed under the Drug Dealer Liability Act  which allows for civil damages against people who participate in the illegal marketing of controlled substances — and may be a way around an existing Michigan law that makes it difficult to sue drug companies over drugs that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administation.

The suit seeks damages for the increased costs of law enforcement and prosecution associated with the epidemic. It also seeks damages for health care costs, costs associated with early childhood education and special education for children born addicted to the drugs, drug treatment costs and other losses created by illegal drug use.

Linda Davis, a retired Clinton Township district court judge who oversaw its drug court and now serves as executive director of Families Against Narcotics, hailed the suit as a good move. “Pharmaceutical companies knew that these drugs were addictive,” she said. They miseducated and misadvertised to doctors. They truly went beyond just prescribing FDA-approved drugs. They misinformed the public.”

Monique Stanton, who is president of CARE of Southeastern Michigan — a social services agency that among other things  works to support and educate people impacted by drugs — said communities are being devastated financially fighting the opioid epidemic. “We are spending huge amounts of resources, whether it’s in the schools .. law enforcement. … Our local communities are significantly  burdened with crating new strategies to address the epidemic.”

She hoped that in addition to potentially bringing financial resources back to the state, the lawsuit would also force a change in policy.  “When you look at things that happened with the tobacco industry, after a lot of those lawsuits, that’s when you began to see some significant changes” such as smoking bans and changes in the way tobacco was marketed. “I would expect to see some similar things related to the opioid epidemic,” she said, suggesting that when doctors prescribe an opioid, they require the user to also carry naloxone, which reverses opioid overdoses. 

Citing a report from the Washington Post, the attorney general’s office said nearly 3 billion opioid pills made it to Michigan between 2006 and 2012. When prescriptions ran out — many doctors have grown reluctant to prescribe them  — or the cost of obtaining the pills on the street grew too expensive, addicts switched to heroin, which is less expensive than pills. Except now, most of the heroin supply is tainted with the ultra-powerful — and extremely inexpensive — synthetic opioid fentanyl. Fentanyl and its analogs are responsible for the majority of opioid overdose deaths in Michigan and throughout the country.

Opioid overdoses account for about 5 1/2 deaths a day in Michigan. In 2018, 2,036 people died from opioid overdoses, down a minuscule .8% from 2,053 in 2017.

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has said she wants to reduce the number of opioid overdose deaths by 50% over the next five years.

While many municipalities across the state have sued drug makers for the crisis, Tuesday’s action represents the first suit filed by the state of Michigan

Contact Georgea Kovanis: gkovanis@freepress.com

Just passed TWO MILLION total page views

My blog is now in its 8th year and it took me five plus years to get ONE MILLION total page views and the second one million page views took only TWO YEARS. Thanks to my many loyal readers. I have learned much from those who have made comments or reached out to me via email, FB messenger, text or phone calls. I hope that other chronic painers have learned something from the nearly 8200 posts that I made since my blogs beginnings.

I have tried to educate and motivate chronic painers to advocate for themselves and I have tried to be very straight forward with what I have shared that others have written or produced videos and hopefully most all realize that I don’t have a hidden agenda nor tried to use some others to make myself more visible and/or seemingly more important than anyone else.

As we enter a new year and a new decade… that this year/decade proves to be much better for those chronic painers than the decade we are leaving behind.

U.S. Sues CVS for Fraudulently Billing Medicare, Medicaid for Invalid Prescriptions

U.S. Sues CVS for Fraudulently Billing Medicare, Medicaid for Invalid Prescriptions

https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2019/12/17/us/17reuters-cvs-lawsuit.html

NEW YORK — CVS Health Corp and its Omnicare unit were sued on Tuesday by the U.S. government, which accused them of fraudulently billing Medicare and other programs for drugs for older and disabled people without valid prescriptions.

The Department of Justice joined whistleblower litigation accusing Omnicare of violating the federal False Claims Act for illegally dispensing drugs to tens of thousands of patients in assisted living facilities, group homes for people with special needs, and other long-term care facilities.

According to a civil complaint filed in Manhattan federal court, Omnicare would often assign new numbers to prescriptions after the original prescriptions expired or ran out of refills.

The government said this enabled Omnicare to bill Medicare Medicaid, and Tricare, which serves military personnel, for hundreds of thousands of drugs, under what the company internally called “rollover” prescriptions, from 2010 to 2018.

Many of the drugs were anticonvulsants, antidepressants and antipsychotics and treated serious conditions such as dementia, depression and heart disease, and sometimes had dangerous side effects requiring supervision by doctors, the government said.

“A pharmacy’s fundamental obligation is to ensure that drugs are dispensed only under the supervision of treating doctors who monitor patients’ drug therapies,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman in Manhattan said in a statement.

“Omnicare put at risk the health of tens of thousands of elderly and disabled individuals living in assisted living and other residential long-term care facilities,” he added.

The lawsuit seeks civil penalties and other damages.

CVS, one of the largest U.S. drugstore chains and pharmacy benefit managers, said it did not believe the claims had merit, and that it intended to defend itself in court.

“We are confident that Omnicare’s dispensing practices will be found to be consistent with state requirements and industry-accepted practices,” the company said in a statement.

CVS, based in Woonsocket, Rhode Island, bought Omnicare in 2015 for about $10.4 billion.

The government joined a lawsuit originally brought in June 2015 by Uri Bassan, a pharmacist who worked for Omnicare in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

It said Omnicare’s compliance department had acknowledged the dispensing problem internally two months earlier, when a regional officer expressed concern in an email that its systems allowed rollover prescriptions “without any documentation or pharmacist intervention.”

The False Claims Act lets whistleblowers sue on behalf of the federal government, and share in recoveries.

Twenty-nine U.S. states and the District of Columbia are also named as plaintiffs.

The cases is U.S. ex rel. Bassan v. Omnicare Inc, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 15-04179.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Bill Berkrot)

This article is confusing to me… particularly about the issue involving long term care (Nursing homes)

I used to work as a temp for 5-6 yrs at one of the Omnicare’s pharmacy/distribution centers and I also served a few nursing homes when we had our own independent pharmacy.

Nursing homes don’t work on “prescriptions” – except for controlled substances – they work on physician orders.  Most nursing homes have two levels of care ICF (intermediary care facility) or SNF (skilled nursing facility) .

As I remember a ICF pt has to have their med orders reviewed and signed every 60 days by their physician and a SNF pt has to have that done every 30 days.

When it came to controlled meds Rxs… we could no longer take orders from the nursing staff in the nursing home… per the DEA they were no longer consider a legal agent of the prescriber.

The Pharmacist would call or text the prescriber, generally there was just a couple of prescribers – one being the medical director for the home – that cared for all the pts in the home..   We got on a first name basis with most of these prescribers… and we would tell the doc that Mrs Smith’s prescription for this controlled med and the prescriber would authorize us to rewrite it and typically put the max number of refills as allowed by law.

If a C-II med was involved, the technician in the control room tracked that the prescriber got a signed Rx back to the pharmacy within 10 days.  The flow was pretty much very well organized and tracking to make sure that all the “i’s” were dotted and “t’s” were crossed…

I retired from working in pharmacy mid -2013 so I don’t know what changes that CVS had implemented since they acquired Omnicare in 2015, but this whistle blower case goes back to 2010. The 5 or 6 years that I worked as a temp at Omnicare… other distribution centers had some paperwork issues with the DEA but the center I worked at must have been much better organized and had all their ducks in a row.

 

 

pts are starting to wonder about “preferred meds” by their insurance

 

Some are wondering why their PBM/Insurance is creating “preferred medications” for pts with specific health issues.  The only answer is the MIDDLEMEN in the medication distribution system.

“EPIGATE” is a fictional term to describe the rapid price increase on EPIPEN (auto injector) used for asthma attacks and acute/severe allergy reactions ( anaphylactic shock ).

the graphic above explains where the pt’s money goes that they pay at the pharmacy counter. In this example $608.00

Out of that $608 dollars:

the pharmacy gets $30 – gross profit of abt 5%

the wholesaler gets $20 – gross profit of abt 3%

The pharma gets $274 – gross revenue of abt 45%

the Insurance/PBM  gets $259 – gross profit of 43%

the broker gets $25 – gross revenue of abt 4%

I am not really sure who the “broker” is but there is a middleman that negotiates rebates/kickbacks/discounts from pharmas for the insurance/PBM companies.

The transaction goes like this… the pharmacy collects $608 from the pt… the pharmacy pays the wholesaler $578 for the Epipen. The wholesaler pays the pharma $558 to the pharma. The pharma pays the broker/insurance/PBM $284

46% of the dollars the pt pays at the pharmacy counter… goes to three middlemen who actually does not even provide a product… just a electronic service of shuffling a claim.

The large percent of the money that the broker/insurance/PBM gets from the money that the pt hands over at the register is largely obtained via coercion..  Those middlemen tell the pharma that if they want their particular medication on their approved formulary the pharma will provide a discount/rebate/kickback (commonly referred to as “the spread”) of a certain percent – often as high as 50% of the wholesale price back to them…  OR… in order for the PBM to pay for their product.. it will only be via a PRIOR AUTHORIZATION PROCESS…. which everyone knows that a prescriber will take the less timely route and prescribe the med that is already on their formulary for a particular health issue.

IMO, we are seeing many PBM’s making buprenorphine type products as their preferred med for chronic pain… that is because they can make a lot more money – via the spread – than having a generic opiate being prescribed.

Secondly, there are some rumors that those law firms that are now suing the pharmas , pharmacy wholesalers and chain pharmacy … will at some time in the future turn their focus on the insurance/PBM industry to sue because they have facilitate the opiate crisis by paying for all those opiates that have been prescribed.

It will probably be several years before that happens and the PBM/insurance industry wants to be in the position of defending themselves by point out that they have move more and more chronic pain pts over to buprenorphine products.

When all is said a done… buprenorphine is still a controlled substance (C-III) with a potential for substance abuse/addiction and diversion.  There has been a small number of clinics treating SUD and chronic pain pts with this medication that have been raided by the DEA and some pts have been selling their buprenorphine on the street to get money to buy their drug of choice to abuse.

You can put “wings” on a pig… and it still will not be able to fly.

Amid physician pressure, Walmart backs off plan to reject paper Rx

Amid physician pressure, Walmart backs off plan to reject paper Rx

https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital/amid-physician-pressure-walmart-backs-plan-reject-paper-rx

What’s in the news: Walmart Inc., the world’s largest retailer, said it is delaying a previously announced move to mandate electronic prescriptions for controlled substances (EPCS) that was scheduled to begin Jan. 1, 2020. The AMA and other medical societies had been urging the delay.

“The AMA welcomes Walmart’s decision to delay implementation of an electronic prescribing mandate that would have resulted in harm to millions of Americans, including many in rural areas who rely on Walmart as the only pharmacy in reasonable distance,” said AMA President Patrice A. Harris, MD, MA.

“The policy, which the AMA urged Walmart to delay, was not developed in consultation with the nation’s physicians, who support electronic prescribing of controlled substances, but want to see it implemented in a manner that supports—rather than disrupts—patient care.”

Why it matters for patients and physicians:

Only about 44% of physicians have the technology to submit electronic prescriptions for controlled substances (EPCS)

Without a delay in implementation, “patients in every state” would have suffered “negative consequences from not having their necessary medications dispensed,” AMA Executive Vice President and CEO James L. Madara, MD, wrote in a letter to Walmart Chief Medical and Analytics Officer Thomas Van Gilder, MD.

Patients affected by the move, Dr. Madara wrote, would likely have included those “receiving care for opioid-use disorder, anxiety, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, auto-immune diseases, HIV/AIDS and painful conditions like sickle cell disease.” It also would likely have made it impossible for thousands of Walmart’s own employees to fill their paper prescriptions in a Walmart pharmacy.

Not all EHR vendor products can satisfy the requirements for EPCS, and that implementation has been set back due to questions about certification, patient concerns and cost to prescribers, Dr. Madara noted in a letter earlier this year to vendors asking for their help to change the situation.

The burden does not lie solely on vendors’ shoulders, the AMA says. More should be done to modernize Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) rules for EPCS to let doctors deploy the user-friendly devices they already have—such as fingerprint readers on laptop computers and mobile phones—to satisfy multifactor-authentication requirements.

What’s next: A federal law enacted in 2018 requires the DEA to modify those requirements, and the agency is working to make the changes. The measure—the Substance Use-Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities Act, or SUPPORT Act—requires that, starting Jan. 1, 2021, Schedule II–V drugs prescribed to patients with Medicare Part D prescription-drug coverage be submitted electronically.

The SUPPORT Act allows for multiple exceptions to the ECPS requirements. States have added other exceptions and ways for doctors and other health professionals to apply for a waiver from the ECPS requirements.

Walmart’s move to delay implementation of its electronic prescribing-only applies to the pharmacies in the company’s Walmart and Sam’s Club stores.

One of my readers asked me to write something how the following medication differ

One of my readers asked me to write something how the following medication differ:

Buprenorphine/(Subutex):  Is administered sublingual (Under the tongue)

Buprenorphine/(Sublocade): administered as a SubQ injection monthly

Buprenorphine/Naloxone (Suboxone): Administered sublingual/buccally film strip

The common ingredient Buprenorphine interacts with three different opiate receptors (Delta, Mu,Kappa) and according to this article … there is NO MME EQUIVALENTS for this medication

Neither the CDC nor Medicare cites buprenorphine as having an MME

The Naloxone/(Narcan) also interacts with various opiate receptors and is suppose to help make Suboxone abuse resistant

Prescribers are required to go thru special training in order to legally prescribe these medications and their DEA license number will be altered to start with a “X” so that pharmacists will know that the prescriber has the legal authority to prescribe these medications.

I checked two difference references and one only lists Buprenorphine is to be used for addiction and the second had a small mention of it being used for mod-severe pain.

I have read reports of the DEA starting to raid practitioner’s offices that are prescribing one or more of these products and there has also been reports of people selling these on the street so that they can get money to buy the drug of choice to abuse.

I have read reports from chronic pain pts across the spectrum of working well, to working for a short period of time, to working very poorly or not at all

My major concern of chronic pain pts using this medication for pain management is that when they change doctors or get admitted to a hospital or go to ER… that regardless of what diagnostic codes are on the pt’s records.  The practitioner will jump to the conclusion that the pt is being treated for has been treated for substance abuse and even worse add the ICD10 code to the pt’s electronic medical records that they are a substance abuser.

Many hospitals systems, that own numerous office practices have a electronic medical record system that works off of central server and what is put on the pt’s electronic medical record by one staff practitioner will show up not only on that particular hospital system but also showing up on all other hospital systems that use the same system.

Looking at the Electronic Medical Records that our local hospital system uses… it shows a list of OVER 100 other hospital systems that use the same system and a pt changes doctors, moves their electronic medical records can be quickly retrieved … including all ICD10 diagnostic codes anyone the pt has seen has added to their medical history.

A pt that has had a SUD (Substance Use Disorder ) incorrectly added to their medical records may be damn near impossible to get it off their medical records.

Likewise taking one of these medications and the pt is in a accident or in need of surgery – especially emergency surgery – may not be able to get adequate anesthesia or pain management because this medication(s) has all the opiate receptors all “tied up” because it has a mean half-life of 31-35 hrs and they claim that for the body to totally eliminate a medication that it can take up to SIX HALF LIVES…  With this medication that could be up to 9 days.

TN 2018: opioid prescriptions continued to decrease …opioid overdose deaths…highest in a 5-years

Pharmacists receive extra training to prevent excess opioid prescriptions

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (WMC) – A Memphis pharmacy company is making sure pharmacists are trained to fight the opioid epidemic by rolling out a new continuing education plan to stop addiction and spare lives.

In 2018, during then-Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam’s administration Tennessee overhauled its prescribing laws to fight the opioid epidemic by putting prescribing limits in place. And while statistics are showing positive signs, medical professionals said there’s more work to be done.

“Almost all the states we work in have some sort of opioid issue going on,” said Rod Recor, Chief Marketing Officer of Comprehensive Pharmacy Services.

The Memphis company has operations in 47 states with 1,600 pharmacists running pharmacies in health care facilities.

“More and more pharmacists are becoming part of care teams. In many of our hospital clients, we have care team approaches to delivering care,” he said.

The company just announced a new stewardship program, a 20-hour training module with video lectures, written activities, and a practicum. The program is aimed at training pharmacists to limit opioid use and find other ways to treat chronic pain. Recor said the company just started their first class of participants.

“This stewardship program really goes to supporting those rules and legislation in Tennessee and other states as well,” he said.

Tennessee tightened opioid prescribing rules in 2018 under a plan known as TN Together. Doctors can write a 3-day opioid prescription with no requirements before prescribing. But doctors may only issue a 10 or 20 day prescription after checking a state controlled substance monitoring database (CSMD), explaining why an opioid was issued, and including a specific diagnosis. Doctors may only prescribe 30-day dosages for “medical necessity.”

The Tennessee Medical Association (TMA) reports opioid prescriptions in the state have continued to decrease and inquiries to the CSMD have increased dramatically, a positive sign, showing more medical professionals are logging in and engaging in prevention.

Despite that, statewide drug overdose deaths attributed to opioids are still trending up, sitting at 1,304 in 2018, the highest in a 5-year time span.

Shelby County reported 123 opioid overdose deaths in 2018, according to TN Department of Health data. That number is down from 159 in the year 2017.