Socrates: stating truth/facts vs spreading rumors

In ancient Greece, Socrates had a great reputation for wisdom. One day someone came to meet the great philosopher and said:

– Do you know what I just heard about your friend?
– One moment –Socrates answered– before you tell me, I would like to make you a test of the three sieves.

– The three sieves?
– Yes – continued Socrates – before telling anything about the others, it is good to take the time to filter what you want to say.

I call it the three-sieve test. The first sieve is the truth. Have you checked if what you are going to tell me is true?

– No, I just heard it.
– Very well. So you don’t know if it’s true. We continue with the second sieve, that of goodness. What you want to tell me about my friend, is it a good thing?

– Oh no! On the contrary.
So,Socrates questioned, “you want to tell me bad things about him and you’re not even sure they’re true?”

Perhaps you can still pass the test of the third sieve of usefulness. Is it useful for me to know what you are going to tell me about this friend?

– Nope.
– So – concluded Socrates – what you were going to tell me is neither true, nor good, nor useful so why did you want to tell me?

Let’s improve our individual life for good and society will change too.

The high price of medications and the Insurance/PBM industry

When I first started working in a pharmacy – in the summer of 1967 – while I was a student. There was NO PBM’s… 95%+ was brand name meds and everything was CASH… The average Rx price was $4-$5.  The PBM industry was created by the national UAW contract in the fall of 1969 – that covered the big three auto makers, John Deere & International Harvester. You could say that I had a “front row seat” to watching the PBM industry evolve since the beginning.

Here is graphic that demonstrates where the $$$ you pay at the Rx dept register really goes. Looking back, as the PBM industry starting controlling more and more of all prescriptions filled … the faster the wholesale price from the pharmas went up. Today, abt 85% of all Rxs are filled with generics and  the PBM’s control the price for 80%-90% of the 4 billion Rxs that we fill every year.  Today the average Rx price is pushing $70.00.

The PBM now are able to DEMAND a kickback/rebate/discount from the pharmas for any med that the pharma doesn’t want to require a prior authorizations.  It has been reported that money from the pharma can be up to 75% of the AWP (average wholesale price)

The new Inflation reduction act, that now laws Medicare to negotiate prices for Medicare covered medications… the Insurance/PBM industry was not included as a entity that should be included in the negotiation of Rx prices. Perhaps that we are having a national election in Nov, maybe a lot of money was put into some re-election campaigns by the insurance/PBM industry to make sure that they were not included in that new law. If you have a family, a business, or others who depend on you, visit here to get life insurance.

If the CPC keeps circling the drain – they will eventually end up going down the drain


I have been maintaining and adding to my blog for over 10 yrs .. I have actually lost count.  There has always seem to be some infighting within the chronic pain community.  Over the last few years, the in fighting has been escalated from in fighting to attempting to be down right DISRUPTIVE.

The community is – and been for decades – dealing with bureaucrats/politicians that regardless of what facts and studies that contradict their “facts” and their “agenda”  they are not going to change their policies and procedures.  They are going to continue to prevent people who have a valid medical necessity for being prescribed opiates and controlled substances from getting their needed medications.

These bureaucrats probably feel very emboldened about continuing to  curtail the prescribing of opiates and controlled substances, because some within the community is trying to just tear the community apart.  They have little concern about the community attempting to change the path that the bureaucrats/politicians are one… because the community is too busy destroying itself from within.

They are going to use such number as within this decade, illegal drugs/substances from cartels will kill MORE OF OUR CITIZENS… than all our soldiers that were killed in all the years of wars in the LAST CENTURY.  Recently, I have read where “they” are admitting that the vast majority of OD/poisoning are from illegal fentanyl analogs… but… they still use their 5 decade old fact “all addicts stated with Rx opiates”

Only those within the community can put a end to this disruptive behavior… If those in the community continue to support, align and otherwise condone the actions of those who are doing this… things will not only remain… it will most likely get worse and those doing the disrupting will only get  more aggressive, until the community has self destructed.

DEA reports finding ‘rainbow fentanyl’ pills in DC region

Is it just me… or according to this –Jennifer Lofland, Field Intelligence Manager for DEA Washington division, says pills have been seized in and around D.C. for at least the last 18 months. – what other major shift happened in our country 18 months ago ?  In the article this is stated She said they’re increasingly finding animal tranquilizers added to pills as well  Are they talking about  carfentanil which is about 100 times more potent than most fentanyl analogs and according to this article methamphetamine is also in these tablets.  Does it really matter who is creating all of these illegal substances, some say it is China, other suggest India and still others claim that the drug cartels themselves are concocting these illegal substances…  It appears pretty plain that the Mexican cartels are targeting OUR CHILDREN and GRANDCHILDREN.

As I remember, when we first declared the war on drugs, elite teams of our armed services would go to those clandestine labs and blow them up – DESTROY THEM.  With the number of illegal substances and fake tablets looking like real Rx meds and now with the appearance of “candy” that are being confiscated… either none of those clandestine labs are being destroyed or the cartels are able to create new ones quicker that we can “take them out”.  

During the 20th century, our county lost 600,000 kids in four different wars ( WW I, WW2, Korea, Vietnam). At the current rate of poisoning of mostly 20-45 y/o people from illegal substances ( opiates, meth, cocaine, crack, etc)… we may reach or exceed the number of soldiers killed in all the years of wars in the last century by the END OF THIS DECADE.

I recently watched a video debate between 4 gentlemen about the opiate crisis and one gentlemen put out a educated guess that the illegal substance OD/poisoning will reach 150,000/yr before the end of the decade.  IMO, we may hit that number by the middle of this decade and this could become more of a likelihood now that our CHILDREN ARE BEING TARGETED BY THE DRUG CARTELS.  Especially, if they are mixing in animal tranquilizers (Carfentanil ?),  OD/poisoning could accelerate quite rapidly.

And if the politicians/bureaucrats follow what they have done historically… they will continue to reduce the supplies of legal opiates and deprive all those people who have a legit medical necessity for those medications.

https://www.fox5dc.com/news/dea-reports-finding-rainbow-fentanyl-pills-in-dc-region

DEA officials say they’ve been seizing rainbow colored fentanyl pills resembling candy in the D.C. region.

On Thursday, border patrol agents in Arizona say they discovered 15,000 of the colored fentanyl pills strapped to someone’s leg.

RELATED: ‘Rainbow Fentanyl’ seized in Portland, drug spreading on West Coast: officials

Jennifer Lofland, Field Intelligence Manager for DEA Washington division, says pills have been seized in and around D.C. for at least the last 18 months.

Colored fentanyl pills with the appearance of candy seized at Port of Nogales. (Credit: US Customs and Border Protection)

“My biggest concern and I think the biggest concern of DEA nationwide, is that the pills seem to be marketed specifically to a younger age group,” Lofland said.

She said especially ahead of school starting, parents need to talk to their kids about never taking a pill unless it’s prescribed by a doctor. Lofland said there’s no way to know how potent an illegal pill might be or what it’s laced with.

“Some of the multi-colored pills that we’ve been testing in our labs recently, particularly a recent batch that appeared to be children’s chewable vitamins, were tested by our lab as containing both fentanyl and methamphetamine,” said Lofland. “And so that is just an added layer of danger.”

She said they’re increasingly finding animal tranquilizers added to pills as well.

READ MORE: Thousands of ‘rainbow fentanyl’ pills seized as authorities warn of possible new ‘trend’ targeting kids

In Oregon, officials seized colored fentanyl that looked like sidewalk chalk.

In Arizona, the port director of the Port of Nolgales tweeted that border patrol officers had seized colored fentanyl pills two days in a row. Michael Humphries said in addition to 15,000 pills found Thursday, 250,000 fentanyl pills were seized Wednesday, some of which were multi-colored.

Another national election soon and the “little boys” out on the West Coast censoring UTUBE

If you haven’t heard,,, Youtube removed this video of our song Take a Knee..My Ass!! After 5.4 million viewed it. Doesn’t fit their guidelines. Hope you’ll watch it and find it in your heart to Share!!! #KAG

This video is now SAVED on my hard drive…. it is not going to get taken down from my blog !

Judge: Pharmacies owe 2 Ohio counties $650M in opioids suit

All of these lawsuits seem somewhat similar to the Tobacco Lawsuit… with ONE MAJOR EXCEPTION… the Tobacco lawsuit was solely against the manufacturers.  With the opiate crisis lawsuit… they are suing the manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers…  why weren’t they including in these lawsuits – all the prescribers who wrote these prescriptions and all the Pharmacists that filled these prescription and they only sue the MAJOR CHAIN PHARMACIES… The pharma, wholesaler, corporate pharmacy chains – are not at the deciding point to write or fill a prescription. It does not appear that smaller chain pharmacies and independent pharmacies, hospital pharmacies or major nursing home pharmacies nor prescribers and chain pharmacy employee pharmacists.   Could it be that JUSTICE can only be served on entities that have DEEP POCKETS ?

Also notice that all these various bureaucratic entities are not putting any taxpayers’ money at risk, they are employing law firms that will put up their money – taking these cases on a contingency basis… the law firms only get paid if they WIN.

Maybe the chronic pain community needs to pay attention to this…  JUSTICE seems to be centered on suing corporate entities with DEEP POCKETS. There is all too many healthcare corporations that are limiting or denying “you” medically necessary therapies.  Various bureaucracies are using our laws and our judicial system (law firms & courts) to pad their individual budgets while constructing a barrier between you and your medically necessary therapy. They bankrupted Purdue pharma and blamed them for the entire opiate crisis – whose opiate meds account to only 4% of all opiate Rxs – and put them out of business… a couple of other pharmas has or in the process of some sort of bankruptcy.

Judge: Pharmacies owe 2 Ohio counties $650M in opioids suit

https://www.marketbeat.com/articles/judge-pharmacies-owe-2-ohio-counties-650m-in-opioids-suit-2022-08-17/

CLEVELAND (AP) — A federal judge in Cleveland awarded $650 million in damages Wednesday to two Ohio counties that won a landmark lawsuit against national pharmacy chains CVS, Walgreens and Walmart, claiming the way they distributed opioids to customers caused severe harm to communities and created a public nuisance.

U.S. District Judge Dan Polster said in the ruling that the money will be used to abate a continuing opioid crisis in Lake and Trumbull counties, outside Cleveland. Attorneys for the counties put the total price tag at $3 billion for the damage done to the counties.

Lake County is to receive $306 million over 15 years. Trumbull County is to receive $444 million over the same period. Polster ordered the companies to immediately pay nearly $87 million to cover the first two years of the abatement plan.

In his ruling, Polster admonished the three companies, saying they “squandered the opportunity to present a meaningful plan to abate the nuisance” after a trial that considered what damages they might owe.

Walmart and Walgreens both said they will be appealing the ruling. CVS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trumbull County Commissioner Frank Fuda praised the award in a statement, saying “the harms caused by this devastating epidemic” can now be addressed.

Lake County Commissioner John Hamercheck said in a statement “Today marks the start of a new day in our fight to end the opioid epidemic.”

A jury returned a verdict in November in favor of the counties after a six-week trial. It was then left to Polster to decide how much the counties should receive from the three pharmacy companies. He heard testimony in May to determine damages.

The counties convinced the jury that the pharmacies played an outsized role in creating a public nuisance in the way they dispensed pain medication into their communities.

It was the first time pharmacy companies completed a trial to defend themselves in a drug crisis that has killed a half-million Americans since 1999.

Attorneys for the pharmacy chains maintained they had policies to stem the flow of pills when their pharmacists had concerns and would notify authorities about suspicious orders from doctors. They also said it was doctors who controlled how many pills were prescribed for legitimate medical needs not their pharmacies.

Walmart issued a statement Wednesday saying the counties’ attorneys “sued Walmart in search of deep pockets, and this judgment follows a trial that was engineered to favor the plaintiffs’ attorneys and was riddled with remarkable legal and factual mistakes. We will appeal.”

Walgreens spokesperson Fraser Engerman said “The facts and the law did not support the jury verdict last fall, and they do not support the court’s decision now.

“The court committed significant legal errors in allowing the case to go before a jury on a flawed legal theory that is inconsistent with Ohio law and compounded those errors in reaching its ruling regarding damages.”

CVS is based in Rhode Island, Walgreens in Illinois and Walmart in Arkansas.

Two chains — Rite Aid and Giant Eagle — settled lawsuits with the counties before trial. The amounts they paid have not been disclosed publicly.

Mark Lanier, an attorney for the counties, said during trial that the pharmacies were attempting to blame everyone but themselves.

The opioid crisis has overwhelmed courts, social services agencies and law enforcement in Ohio’s blue-collar corner east of Cleveland, leaving behind heartbroken families and babies born to addicted mothers, Lanier told jurors.

Roughly 80 million prescription painkillers were dispensed in Trumbull County alone between 2012 and 2016 — equivalent to 400 for every resident. In Lake County, some 61 million pills were distributed during that period.

The rise in physicians prescribing pain medications such as oxycodone and hydrocodone came as medical groups began recognizing that patients have the right to be treated for pain, Kaspar Stoffelmayr, an attorney for Walgreens, said at the opening of the trial.

The problem, he said, was “pharmaceutical manufacturers tricked doctors into writing way too many pills.”

The counties said pharmacies should be the last line of defense to prevent the pills from getting into the wrong hands.

The trial before Polster was part of a broader constellation of about 3,000 federal opioid lawsuits consolidated under the his supervision. Other cases are moving ahead in state courts.

Kevin Roy, chief public policy officer at Shatterproof, an organization that advocates for solutions to addiction, said in November the verdict could lead pharmacies to follow the path of major distribution companies and some drugmakers that have reached nationwide settlements of opioid cases worth billions. So far, no pharmacy has reached a nationwide settlement.

Boards of Medicine Accountability

Boards of Medicine Accountability

https://doctorsofcourage.org/boards-of-medicine/

One of the arms of attack on doctors treating pain and the patients they treat is the state board of medicine. They need to be held accountable for their inexcusable actions over the last 20 years.

The state boards of medicine are attacking doctors treating pain more than any other reason. And most of their attacks are unwarranted. So what is their purpose?  I contend that their purpose is purely monopolistic—to cull out the independent/minority physicians in competition with the hospital/large medical group practices. I also contend that the medical boards are in collusion with the government to eliminate those doctors treating the populations of citizens that the government would rather see dead—the elderly, uninsured, government insured, disabled, minority, or poor.

So how are they getting away with this, and what can we do about it?  First, we have to understand the purpose of the medical board. As stated by the AMA in their Journal of Ethics,

“State medical boards are the agencies that license medical doctors, investigate complaints, discipline physicians who violate the medical practice act, and refer physicians for evaluation and rehabilitation when appropriate. The overriding mission of medical boards is to serve the public by protecting it from incompetent, unprofessional, and improperly trained physicians, ensuring that only qualified physicians are licensed to practice medicine and that those physicians provide their patients with a high standard of care.”

The medical board evaluates a physician’s professional conduct or ability to practice medicine by reviewing complaints from patients, malpractice data, information from hospitals, and reports from government agencies. The state statute commonly known as the medical practice act defines unprofessional conduct in each state. Although laws vary by jurisdiction some examples of unprofessional conduct include:

  • physical abuse of a patient,
  • inadequate record keeping,
  • not recognizing or acting on common symptoms,
  • prescribing drugs in excessive amounts without legitimate reason,
  • impaired ability to practice due to addiction,
  • failing to meet continuing medical education requirements,
  • performing duties beyond the scope of a license,
  • dishonesty,
  • conviction of a felony,
  • inappropriately delegating the practice of medicine to an unlicensed individual.

Medical boards are supposed to focus on protecting the public, not on punishing physicians. Most problems can be resolved with additional education or training in appropriate areas. In other instances, it may be more appropriate to place physicians on probation or place restrictions on a physician’s license. This compromise allows the public to be protected while maintaining a valuable community resource in the physician. Probation and restrictions of a medical license can also be in place while a physician receives further training or rehabilitation.

I have researched the actions of the Virginia Board of Medicine over the last 20 years. And what I’ve found out is that, for the most part, doctors investigated for prescribing opioids have their abilities to do so taken away from them and eventually lose their license. The information is available HERE.

Comparing the actions of the Virginia Medical Board with the above stated purpose, I have identified the following:

Although there are ten reasons for investigation or censure, two (prescribing controlled drugs and impaired ability to practice due to addiction) involve over half of the board actions. And about half of those (the doctors addicted), don’t get their licenses suspended until they fail the PHMP, which all of them eventually do because conventional treatment doesn’t cure addiction.  So the group of doctors affected most are those prescribing controlled drugs, especially opioids. And the reasons behind the censure isn’t because the prescribing has harmed the patient in any way, but simply because the government propaganda against opioids gives the Boards of Medicine a door through which they can eliminate doctors of their choice.

Doctors and patients need to understand this problem and help rectify it. You can do so by doing what I have done for the state of Virginia—create a data sheet similar to the Complete list on Virginia Board of Medicine Attacks and send it to us.

As doctors from each state see how their medical board is constructed to eliminate them from the profession, we should have good justification for taking legal action.  So be a part of the solution and help, not a part of the problem.

 

 

Walmart has a new policy denying some telehealth prescriptions for controlled drugs. It’s implicating patients in recovery

Walmart has a new policy denying some telehealth prescriptions for controlled drugs. It’s implicating patients in recovery

https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/digital-health/new-policy-walmart-denies-telehealth-prescriptions-without-person-visit

As the country enters a new phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, some states have begun to make permanent changes to expand telehealth policies implemented under the public health emergency. Others have passed laws restricting them. 

Prescribing controlled substances, including medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), via telemedicine has been possible during the pandemic due to an exemption to the Ryan Haight Act. The law generally does not allow such a prescription without a prior in-person exam of the patient. Recent data has found that the use of telehealth to prescribe MOUD has increased access to opioid recovery treatment.

But unclear regulatory requirements have complicated operations for providers and pharmacies alike. According to 2018 guidance issued by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Ryan Haight Act provides an exception to in-person exams for MOUD prescribed via telemedicine. Yet earlier this year, the DEA publicly indicated such an exception has only been provided temporarily under the public health emergency. 

The DEA could not clarify this discrepancy when Fierce Healthcare reached out for comment.

The public health emergency is not due to expire until mid-October. Yet Walmart is no longer accepting prescriptions for controlled substances issued via telehealth without an in-person visit in the prior 24 months, Fierce Healthcare has learned. This policy, introduced in July, has implicated virtual providers of opioid use disorder treatment—whose prescribers practice remotely—and their patients. 

The company was one of two major pharmacies to begin curbing certain telehealth prescriptions in May.

Walmart did not respond to multiple requests for comment, but one Walmart pharmacy employee confirmed the existence of the policy applicable to all Walmart and Sam’s Club pharmacies that began in July.

The DEA would not comment on the policy. In a March press release, the agency’s administrator said “we want medication-assisted treatment to be readily and safely available to anyone in the country who needs it.”

“This is an ongoing theme we’ve been experiencing with pharmacies since the beginning of the pandemic,” said Stephanie Strong, founder and CEO of Boulder Care, a telehealth addiction treatment provider.

In 2020, the Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Walmart for allegedly unlawfully dispensing controlled substances during the height of the opioid crisis and failing to report suspicious orders placed by its pharmacies. Its latest policy, Strong believes, is the pendulum swinging the other way. 

“We’ve always had challenges with pharmacies,” echoed Ankit Gupta, founder and CEO of Bicycle Health, a virtual addiction medicine clinic. “There are regulations that make it challenging for pharmacies to dispense controlled medications.” 

When prescribers are questioned by pharmacies, they typically call them to explain who they are and why they believe the prescription is legitimate. Independent pharmacies are more amenable to that conversation, virtual addiction treatment providers say.

“They often have a lot of questions, they often have a lot of skepticism, but they also have a lot more leverage to make their own decisions,” said Emily Behar, vice president of clinical operations at virtual opioid use disorder provider Ophelia. Lately, with Walmart, that approach “has been a brick wall.” Boulder, Bicycle and Ophelia patients have been transferred away from Walmart pharmacies to prevent disruptions in treatment. 

Other retailers that have recently rejected telehealth scripts from the providers include Walgreens, Costco and CVS locations.

CVS Health told Fierce Healthcare it has no policy requiring telehealth prescriptions of controlled substances to have an in-person exam. “Our policies require pharmacists to exercise their professional judgment in determining whether or not to fill a controlled substance prescription, regardless of whether the prescription was written during an in-person visit or a telehealth visit,” a spokesperson said. 

Though Walgreens would not confirm or deny the existence of a formal policy, it responded that it “follows all applicable federal and state laws and regulations related to the dispensing of controlled substances.” That “includes verifying that there is a valid relationship between the patient and the prescriber. If a prescription presents red flags that cannot be resolved, our pharmacists will refuse to fill it.” 

Finding an alternative pharmacy presents many challenges, providers say. They must make sure a pharmacy won’t stigmatize their patients but also carries the right formulation of a given medication that’s also covered by the patient’s insurance.

Often, there is no other pharmacy in a patient’s vicinity that carries buprenorphine, meaning they have to travel many miles to get the medication. Large chains “are some of the most critical resources for these patients,” Strong said.

Not only is distance an access barrier for patients, but it can also be considered a red flag “that doesn’t actually have to do with diversion or increased concern for the patient clinically,” Behar noted. “It is just a terrible hindrance for them and potentially could lead to a lot of destabilization,” she said about patients. Withdrawal could lead to relapse. 

All of these considerations keep providers from scaling, which could help boost access to treatment. “We can’t necessarily grow as quickly as we would otherwise,” Strong said. This approach could also damage patients’ trust in telehealth as a model.

“It’s also sort of about our patients feeling like addicts, feeling like they’ve done something wrong by being a part of a telemedicine model of care. Which, in fact, is not the case,” Gupta said. 

Providers worry that once a major retailer like Walmart implements a policy, others might follow suit. “It really can be a chilling effect across an entire set of care that keeps people alive,” said Rose Bromka, chief operating officer of Boulder Care. Being denied a prescription “can make the difference between someone staying in care and someone not staying in care.”

Walmart and other chains’ recent stance is the product of years’ worth of fear and confusing federal and state laws, experts say.

Despite buprenorphine’s proven reduction of the risk of overdose, it is an opioid itself, leading the DEA to take an especially aggressive stance on the medication. As a result, wholesalers and pharmacists worry about exceeding volume caps on orders, so as not to get flagged by the DEA. One CVS pharmacy told Fierce Healthcare it has exceeded its vendor’s limit and can no longer order controlled substances like buprenorphine.

Corporate policies that limit telehealth prescriptions “are a threat to patient safety and recovery,” said Anna Legreid Dopp, senior director of clinical guidelines and quality improvement at the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. “It is a step backward in leveraging virtual care to increase patient access to medications for opioid use disorder and to address the opioid crisis.”

Between regional DEA offices, state pharmacy associations and boards of pharmacy, many players are involved in regulating and informing pharmacists. The only way to clarify discrepancies in rules is to work together. “It’s just a loop of as much transparent communication as possible,” said Ronna Hauser, SVP of policy and pharmacy affairs at the National Community Pharmacists Association. “You never want the day to be where our members have a fear factor from the DEA.”

More multidisciplinary education with prescribers and providers on buprenorphine would also help, she added. 

“We hope Walmart and these other large chains will recognize that we empathize so much with what they’re trying to do,” Strong said. “But we hope that they’ll look to us, multi-state clinicians who are focused on access and patient care, to find that path forward.” 

In an emailed statement, a spokesperson from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) said medications for opioid use disorder are “vital” and said Health and Human Services “is working within its public-sector authority to increase access and availability for such medications as part of a concerted campaign across federal agencies to decrease overdose deaths.” 

In a letter to the Office of National Drug Control Policy from mid-July, Ophelia suggested creating guidance for a mail-order pharmacy that can ship controlled substance medications nationwide. It also urged ONDCP to encourage the DEA to remove buprenorphine from its Suspicious Orders Monitoring System and create an incentive program for large chain pharmacies to partner with high-quality providers, both telehealth and in-person. 

 

Inflation Reduction Act – promised future $$ savings with new TAXES starting next year

This information was sent to me by the National Community Pharmacists Assoc – which represents independent pharmacists and I have been a member for FORTY YEARS.

There is a lot of FUTURE DATES when some of these “savings” will start… Whoever is sworn in as our President in Jan, 2025 will get to deal with the good or bad as these new rules “kick in”.  Likewise, a lot of small businesses – like your local independent pharmacy will get new taxes so that a TAX BREAK to private equity investorsyou know those “fat cats” that have 100’s of billions of dollars to trade in the stock market.

Medicare/Medicaid folks could have their medications no longer covered because the pharma no longer wishes to have one or more of their medications covered by Medicare/Medicaid.  Everyone should notice that there is no mention of the insurance/PBM industry agreeing to any price negotiations  The top 4-5 PBM’s are owned by insurance companies and I have seen stated numerous times that the PBM demand up to a 75% discount/rebate/kickback for the pharma to have one or more of their meds on the PBM’s pre-approved formulary, otherwise the pharma’s meds would ALWAYS REQUIRE a prior authorization to get the PBM to approve coverage for the medication that the pt’s prescriber considered was in the pt’s best interest. These same small number of  PBM’s control the price and coverage of 80%-90% of the FOUR BILLION PRESCRIPTIONS we fill every year… including those Rxs handled by those “cash Rx discount cards”  Since mid-term election is abt 3 months away… I wonder how much money the Insurance/PBM industry contributed to the re-election campaigns of those who voted for the INFLATION REDUCTION ACT ?

everyone should read the CBO’s opinion of the fiscal outcome of this act  https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/inflation-reduction-act-will-cost-middle-class-20b-cbo/

NCPA Member Summary of the Inflation Reduction Act
On Aug. 16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act, which includes provisions that should impact
community pharmacy. For a thorough analysis, see Kaiser Family Foundation’s (KFF)
slides and presentation.
Medicare Drug Price Negotiation. For pharmacies, reimbursement could be impacted under the new Medicare price
negotiation framework, as any difference between the negotiated price and discounted price for a drug would be “trued
up” within prompt pay requirements. NCPA has secured language for the record in the House of Representatives that the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will not implement the act in a way that would cause any reduction in
pharmacy reimbursement or require or permit price concessions or other remuneration from the pharmacy because of
Medicare drug price negotiation. Additionally, the language stated that implementation should operate in the same
manner as the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap Discount Program.

Starting in 2026, the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services will negotiate pricing for the 10 top
spend drugs in Medicare Part D, many of which are dispensed in community pharmacy, and would increase the number
of drugs negotiated yearly and include Part B drugs by 2028:

2026: 10 drugs based on Part D spending

2027: 15 drugs based on Part D spending

2028: 15 drugs based on combined Part D and Part B spending

2029 and beyond: 20 drugs based on combined Part D and Part B spending

The above is a cumulative list and should result in 60 negotiated drugs by the end of the decade. According to
Juliette
Cubanski
, deputy director of the program on Medicare policy at KFF, CMS should know in 2023 the list of drugs for 2026.
Manufacturers who do not negotiate will face an excise tax, starting at 65 percent of a drug’s prior year sales, increasing
by 10 percent every quarter up to 95 percent. The tax would be suspended if manufacturers choose to have their drugs
no longer covered by Medicare or Medicaid. Additionally, manufacturers face a civil monetary penalty for not offering
the negotiated price of up to 10 times the difference between the price charged and the negotiated price.

Annual outofpocket cap. The 5 percent coinsurance for catastrophic coverage in Medicare Part D is eliminated in
2024. Outofpocket costs for Medicare Part D beneficiaries would be capped at $2,000 per year in plan year 2025. In
subsequent years, the $2,000 threshold will be increased at the rate of growth for the Part D program.

Optional “smoothing” of patient costsharing. Starting in 2025, Part D patients can elect to have costsharing smoothed
out over the course of the benefit year. The growth in Part D premiums is capped at 6 percent per year from 2024 to
2030.

Vaccines. Costsharing for adult vaccines covered under Medicare Part D is eliminated beginning January 2023 and
access to adult vaccines under Medicaid and CHIP is improved.

Drug rebate rule. The drug rebate rule is delayed to 2032, which Democrats are using once again as a budget gimmick to
offset the cost of the legislation.


Drug rebates. For each calendar quarter beginning on or after January 1, 2023, drug manufacturers must pay a rebate if
drug prices increase faster than the rate of inflation for:

Singlesource drugs and biologicals covered under Medicare Part B, except those whose average annual cost is
less than $100; and

All covered drugs under Medicare Part D, except those where average annual cost is less than $100.

Insulin. Monthly copayment spend on insulin is capped at $35 for plan years 2023, 2024, and 2025 for those drugs
covered in Medicare Part D and Medicare Advantage. For plan year 2026 and subsequent years, the cap will be the
lesser of $35 or an amount equal to 25 percent of the maximum fair price established for the covered insulin product or
an amount equal to 25 percent of the negotiated price of the covered insulin product. A copayment cap for insulin in
private insurance plans was stripped. Insulin furnished through durable medical equipment under Medicare Part B will
also have a monthly copayment cap at $35, with no deductible, beginning in 2023. Currently,
Medicare Part D’s Senior
Savings Model
has a $35 maximum copayment for insulin. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, at
least 21 states have enacted state legislation capping insulin copayments.

Tax provisions. NCPA joined in a signon letter to leadership expressing concerns about the law’s tax provisions. The law
gives the Internal Revenue Service an additional $80 billion in funding to grow the IRS from 80,000 to over 160,000
employees. Additionally, an amendment added last minute by the Senate extends for two years the Section 461(l) cap
on losses business owners can claim. This $52 billion tax hike on passthrough businesses was used to offset the cost of
exempting private equity investors from the 15percent corporate minimum tax.

The MONSTERS at Pfizer Re-categorized Miscarriages as ‘Resolved’ or ‘Recovered’ Adverse Events

https://rumble.com/embed/v1djkrp/

https://rumble.com/v1g5qod-the-monsters-at-pfizer-recategorized-miscarriages-as-resolved-or-recovered-.html

 

Dr. Naomi Wolf: “Pfizer notes the miscarriages as serious adverse events with moderate or severe toxicity ratings. However, all of them were re-categorized, by Pfizer, in the internal documents under the category of adverse events that were ‘recovered’ or ‘resolved.’

Like you had a problem when you had a baby. When you lost the baby, you recovered from that problem. It resolved the adverse event; the negative thing. The miscarriage is in the same category as a headache that went away. If you lost your baby, Pfizer said, ‘Your adverse event was recovered or resolved.'”