Maybe we have been going at this problem of denial of pain management all wrong.
For the last 4+ years all the media had to say was “that no one is above the law”, yet that seemed like a incomplete sentence “EXCEPT those who are in charge of enforcing our laws or has friends that are in charge of enforcing the law”
There was a time that the DOJ/DEA would try to attach a OD/poisoning to a prescriber no matter the time frame between the prescriber had once prescribed a opioid for a person and when the DOJ/DEA would claim that a single Rx was the start of the person’s addiction, and his/her on going addiction, which ended in their OD/poisoning death!
Recently the DOJ/DEA accused CVS & Walgreens of filling millions of illegal Rxs. Within the article the DOJ/DEA claimed that they illegally filled concurrently the three meds opioids, benzo & muscle relaxant and that was an ILLEGAL COMBINATION. Of course, CVS & Walgreens just BENT OVER and agreed to pay billions, while not admitting to doing anything wrong.
Recently there was an illegal alien and his third DUI and involved in a auto accident and killed a Mother and her Daughter.
What ever DA, prosecutor, judge let that guy out after the first & second DUI.. should they have some responsibility for the death of those two legal citizens?
I would put money on that if that accident that the Mother ending up killing the Daughter, and the Mother had taken some Rx that made her drowsy, she would be charged and sent to jail. “They” would have probably tried to go after the prescriber as well.
Maybe it is time that Pam Bondi to go after the bureaucrats behind this all these illegal aliens doing illegal things even killing some of the people of our legal society. Isn’t their actions “contributing to” these illegal acts by having no-cash bail
Should “we” be pushing for civil liability for any part of our judicial system or legislative system whose actions directly/indirectly causes the death of one of our legal citizens.. Depriving those citizens their right to Life.. Liberty …pursuit of Happiness?
This article is about judges helping illegal aliens avoid being captured by ICE
there are both cities/counties/states that have declared they are pro abortion and anti abortion
Yes, there are states, counties, and cities in the U.S. that have declared themselves as sanctuaries for women seeking abortions, as well as ones that have done the opposite—designating themselves as “sanctuary cities for the unborn,” which restrict abortion access.
Sanctuary States for Abortion Access
-
California, Illinois, New York, New Mexico, Colorado, Oregon, and Washington are among the states that have codified abortion rights and taken steps to establish themselves as so-called “abortion sanctuary” states. These states have passed laws to protect out-of-state patients traveling for abortion and, in some cases, limit local or state law enforcement cooperation with investigations into abortion-related activity originating from anti-abortion states.
Illinois and New Mexico in particular have seen dramatic increases in patients traveling for abortion from surrounding restrictive states
-
In practice, these states and their major cities have become destinations where women from more restrictive regions travel to obtain legal abortion care.
there are many cities, counties, and states that explicitly declare themselves as sanctuaries for banning abortion, sometimes using the term “Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn.” These entities pass local ordinances or state laws aimed at outlawing abortion within their boundaries and, in some cases, restricting assistance for those seeking abortion elsewhere.
US Attorney Admits that He was Directed to Target Doctors Who had NO criminal intent
Filed under: General Problems
I’ve been pushing for liability of all those people and associations guilty of putting innocent doctors in prison. It could be done, when the CSA is repealed by law. I have an example bill written. People just aren’t interested. When that happens it will set a precedent forcing the law makers and law enforcers to follow the law and not do what they want because they can. People need to support this. Now I just wonder if my ideas will be posted.
Linda,
I don’t think that I have ever put one of your comments in my “electronic Trashcan” There is too many attorney in Congress to get them to do anything about the CSA. We have 9K-10K DEA employees at the federal level and I have never seen a number of city/count/state employees are involved in the fighting the war on drugs. The DEA stopped published how much they were spending on the war when it approached 100 billion/yr and current estimates is 120-140 billion/yr. As long as we keep sending the same self-center politicians back to Congress every 2 yrs. Nothing is going to change – every 2 yrs we could clean the slate in the House 435 members up for re-election along with 33-34 in the Senate 85%+/- of Congress is up for re-election every 2 yrs. Mitch, Chuckie, & Nancy goes back every 2 yrs. Mitch has chosen he is not running again he has been in Congress since 1985 – 40 years. Rand Paul will become the SENIOR Senator for KY.
Regarding opioid medications, and who is culpable, for deaths, when comparing alcohol against opioids…
Good analogy you gave.
Alcohol…
The Govt made it illegal to produce, sell or distribute alcohol legally during prohibition, and look what happened. Mafia steeped in, as well as others.
I had a great aunt with mental issues, she used alcohol to keep herself “normal”. But she drank some bad “bath tub” gin, and went completely blind in on eye.
Let’s see what happens if they pass another amendment making opioids illegal like they did alcohol.
Except this time, none of the illegal manufacturers care if their product is safe or not. At least some of the illegal alcohol was clean. The makers wanted to keep their clients alive to keep the demand up.
Not now.
No amendment needed. Just cut off the supply.
Your Mom probably went blind because she got some moonshine from someone who did not knowing what he was doing. the first part of the batch of moonshine has Methanol in it and the smart moonshiners threw it away, those moonshiners who didn’t know or wanted to get all the yield out of a batch, didn’t do that and some people paid dearly, like your Mom.
They reverse the alcohol prohibition because the bureaucrats could not deal with all the alcohol taxes that they were not collecting and Canada was sending their legal whiskey across the great lakes and there was apparently a good supply of various liquors to meet demand