Takes investigative reporter to get Aetna mail order pharmacy to GET IT RIGHT ?

I’m not comfortable .. let me count the ways ?

stevemailbox

Hello Steve my name is J, I’m a disabled person living in palm beach, Florida who’s having an impossible time obtaining my necessary medications. I’ve gone to the same neurologist/specialist for almost 15 years and he prescribes me (60) 10mg percocet, 500mg Depakote, 100mg Sumatriptan, and (30) 50mg Vyvance, and 40mg Prozac per month. I have no history of drug abuse, no questionable encounters, and the same meds for a decade+.

Although I still own my home in B R Florida, I just acquired a new home in L W (both in same County) and I have been unable to fill my prescriptions at any local pharmacy due to apparent high drug abuse activity in this city. I have changed my license to reflect the new local address, given a current & valid prescription, shown all insurance, Medicare, and disability documentation, and yet I’m still refused at CVS where I have filled the same script for 7 years (at the same Location), Walgreens, Publix, etc. I am treated like a fiend each place I attempt to fill.

When asked why I would be refused the medication they filled for me just a month ago, they said it was due to my license address not being within 3 miles of pharmacy…. I change my license next day, go back and I am told they won’t fill it because my Specialist is in the next county over. Even after explaining that he has me on long-term ongoing treatments, they refuse. When asked for an explanation, I was told they did not need a reason and they would call the cops if I didn’t leave the store immediately! How can this be legal??? Is this not discriminatory?

I have been off of my meds for 3 days now and feel lost as to what my options are. Please advise.

Thank you for your time & knowledge,

Most of the requests were “never reviewed by federal judges or Justice Department lawyers,”

DEA surveillance has tripled during last decade – report

http://rt.com/usa/264645-dea-eavesdropping-wiretap-requests/

Federal drug cops in the United States are conducting electronic eavesdropping three times as often as they were nearly a decade ago, new records reveal.

US Drug Enforcement Agency data obtained by USA Today show that the number of annual requests filed for wiretaps and other sort of electronic eavesdropping went from 3,394 in 2005 to 11,681 during the last fiscal year.

According to the newspaper, which first reported the revelations on Wednesday after obtaining statistics through Freedom of Information Act requests, that surge in surveillance occurred largely without oversight. Most of the requests were “never reviewed by federal judges or Justice Department lawyers,” USA Today reported.

Instead, DEA agents are bypassing the DoJ and taking their requests to local prosecutors and judge across the country around 60 percent of the time.

Federal law requires top DoJ officials to sign off on any potential wiretaps, but a loophole allows for federal agents to file those same requests with state courts –where those restrictions don’t exist.

Prosecutors are still required to demonstrate probable cause, but USA Today reporter Brad Heath wrote that interpretations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

Reuters / Mike Blake

Federal drug cops in the United States are conducting electronic eavesdropping three times as often as they were nearly a decade ago, new records reveal.

US Drug Enforcement Agency data obtained by USA Today show that the number of annual requests filed for wiretaps and other sort of electronic eavesdropping went from 3,394 in 2005 to 11,681 during the last fiscal year.

According to the newspaper, which first reported the revelations on Wednesday after obtaining statistics through Freedom of Information Act requests, that surge in surveillance occurred largely without oversight. Most of the requests were “never reviewed by federal judges or Justice Department lawyers,” USA Today reported.

Instead, DEA agents are bypassing the DoJ and taking their requests to local prosecutors and judge across the country around 60 percent of the time.Federal law requires top DoJ officials to sign off on any potential wiretaps, but a loophole allows for federal agents to file those same requests with state courts –where those restrictions don’t exist.

Prosecutors are still required to demonstrate probable cause, but USA Today reporter Brad Heath wrote that interpretations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

“Within Justice, it was a rigorous standard,” former DoJ attorney Stephen T’Kach told Heath. “In the states, you have 50 different standards for what’s going to be enough.”“That law exists to make sure that wiretap authority is not abused, that it’s only used when totally appropriate,” added Hanni Fakhoury, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation digital rights group. “That’s a burden. And if there’s a way to get around that burden, the agents are going to try to get around it.”

According to Joseph Moses, a DEA spokesperson, the uptick in requests reflects “the proliferation of communication devices and methods” used by the drug traffickers.

Indeed, other reports in recent months suggest that drug cops have embraced an array of state-of-the-art surveillance tools to give the DEA the ability to cast a digital fishing net unmatched by most other government agencies: Earlier this year it was revealed that the DEA has spent over $2 million on sophisticated surveillance equipment. Those digital tools were purchased through a front company secretly acting on behalf of “Hacking Team,” an Italian vendor of spy tools. Weeks earlier, USA Today reported that the DEA began running a telephone surveillance program in the early 1990s that was not unlike the National Security Agency operation instituted after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and reined in only this week.

If you are in jail and denied your meds… the ACLU will come to your rescue

Lawsuit sought over squalid conditions at Baltimore jail

http://www.wbaltv.com/news/lawsuit-sought-over-squalid-conditions-at-jail/33353804

BALTIMORE —Moldy showers and cells are infested with mice and cockroaches, toilets are broken for days and medical care is poor or nonexistent at a notoriously troubled Baltimore City Detention Center, the ACLU and Public Justice Center said in court documents filed in federal court on Tuesday.

Paperwork and pictures call conditions at the jail “dangerous, unconstitutional and deadly.”

The groups want a federal judge to reopen a lawsuit against the state of Maryland over what they say are conditions so substandard they bring “shame to this city.” Inmates suffering from serious illnesses such as HIV and diabetes are being denied life-sustaining prescription medication and the state has failed to cure well-documented systemic problems within the jail after entering into a 2007 agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, the court documents said.

The Freddie Gray case raises questions about how detainees are handled by Baltimore police. This new argument takes the next step, demanding change in how people are treated once in custody at the city jail.

A big corruption scandal from a couple of years ago put the Baltimore City Detention Center on the map with a gang leader claiming to run the place with such impunity he impregnated several guards while in custody.

Now, there are new complaints about how the jail is run. The complaints, filed by lawyers with the Public Justice Center, argue the state has failed to comply with a long-running federal court mandate to keep the place clean and safe.

In a 103-page motion filed Tuesday, the lawyers say the jail “remains a dank and dangerous place, where detainees are confined in dirty cells infested with vermin. The showers are full of drain flies, black mold and filth.”

Pictures show a rusted shower stall, what appears to be black mold around vents and a mattress in such bad shape, the lawyers argue, sanitation between users is no longer possible.

Lawyers contend the jail still lacks a proper laundry, so detainees have to improvise.

“(They) continue to do personal laundry in sinks, mop buckets and other containers that allow the spread of disease,” the lawyers said.

“The place is falling down over there,” said Debra Gardner, legal director for the Public Justice Center. “It has gotten to be a sickening game of chance surviving in the jail, and that’s unconstitutional.”

The lawyers cite a long list of cases concerning medical care in the jail or, as they argue, the lack thereof.

The lawyers said some detainees have died, including a man suffering from high blood pressure. The inmate was supposed to be on medication, but the lawyers argue, “The medical records do not show that he received that medication. There is not even a single recorded blood pressure during his June confinement. The autopsy indicated that he died of hypertensive cardiovascular disease.”

Inmates with disabilities are assigned to cells that can’t meet their needs and they are often denied health-care supplies, ranging from urinary bag and catheter changes to properly working wheelchairs, the documents said.

“It’s so bad one of our co-counsel has described it as one of three worst he has seen in the country,” Gardner said.

There were 43 incidents involving detainees making urgent medical visits related to excessive heat because their cells were not properly ventilated, reaching a heat index of 94 degrees in one instance, according to the motion. Over a three-month period, there were 26 instances in which broken toilets were not repaired for three days, far longer than the eight-hour mandate.

Stephen Moyer, secretary of the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, said he was committed to making changes. The department noted the state has spent more than $58 million to improve the safety and security of inmates and staff over the past 10 years.

“I was 4 years old when this original case was filed in 1964,” Moyer said in a statement. “I am 54 and have only had four months to learn about these perceived issues. I have high expectations of my staff to change the way we do business.

Patients scramble after CVS says it will no longer fill group’s controlled drug prescriptions

Patients scramble after CVS says it will no longer fill group’s controlled drug prescriptions

http://www.trinityjournal.com/news/local/article_5e0cc28e-099a-11e5-827c-03c09bc8abe3.html

Patients of the Trinity Alps Medical Group are scrambling after the CVS Pharmacy in Weaverville announced it will no longer fill any controlled drug prescriptions for patients of the group.

The decision affects patients of Dr. Stemple, physician’s assistant Julie Eaker and nurse practitioner Vanessa DeMoss. It does not affect those of Surgeon Daniel Harwood who works out of the same building.

 

House added another $23 million in cuts to DEA salaries and administrative expenses.

Sex parties cost DEA millions in funding cuts

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/sex-parties-cost-dea-millions-in-funding-cuts/article/2565507

The House got its revenge late Tuesday night against the Drug Enforcement Administration by cutting millions of dollars in funding for the agency, after it was revealed in March that DEA officials participated in “sex parties” in Colombia with prostitutes.

The Office of Inspector General for the Justice Department released a report in March that said these sex parties were attended by prostitutes that were “funded by the local drug cartels.” In a hearing held later, officials later admitted that the cartels providing the prostitutes were the same cartels the DEA officials were supposed to be investigating.

The scandal forced then-DEA Administrator Michele Leonhart to resign about a month later.

Tuesday night, the House punished the DEA even more by piling on cuts to administrative salaries. Members were considering legislation to fund the Department of Justice and other related agencies, a bill that already withholds $20 million from DEA until the agency implements recommendations aimed at addressing “employee misconduct.”

In a series of quick amendment votes Tuesday night, the House added another $23 million in cuts to DEA salaries and administrative expenses. One of these came in the form of an amendment from Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., who wanted to cut $4 million from DEA and use the money fund efforts to investigate sexual assault against children.

Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., proposed another $9 million in cuts to DEA salaries to boost funding to help children and victims of abuse, and Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas, proposed a $10 million cut to DEA salaries to fund police body cameras.

Each of these proposals was approved by voice vote, showing that both parties were fine with cuts to DEA.

The House turned away just one other proposal, also from Cohen, to cut DEA salaries by $12 million to boost funding for the Legal Services Corporation.

Benton Police Chief Kirk Lane… 4th Amendment gets in our way ?

Law Change to Expand Law Enforcement Access to Prescription Drug Monitoring Program

http://www.arkansasmatters.com/story/d/story/law-change-to-expand-law-enforcement-access-to-pre/20391/hx2UlB9LDUS6qqZlEaqWnA

LITTLE ROCK, AR – A change to the law during the most recent legislative session will expand access of the state prescription drug monitoring program to certified law enforcement without a search warrant in an effort, supporters say, to curb rising problems with prescription drug abuse. 
Pharmacist Stacy Riley can have a person’s prescription history at her fingertips if something raises a red flag when they come to her counter at Cornerstone Pharmacy. 
“If see they’re bringing in another prescription in two weeks but they have a 30 day supply, I’m going to call that doctor’s office,” she said. 
The Arkansas Prescription Drug Monitoring program has been available to pharmacists and physicians since 2011, not only to help make sure patients aren’t receive drugs that will negatively interact, but also help track doctor shoppers and over-prescribers.  
“It’s definitely a real thing, and it is a sad thing,” Riley said.
But up until this year, law enforcement access had been restricted unless officers could obtain a search warrant for the records. 
“A lot of times having that access can start or stop the investigation,” said Benton Police Chief Kirk Lane. “The search warrant can be a big barrier to that. The time and paperwork it takes to obtain puts you out of the game on catching these individuals.” 
According to Lane, those involved in the prescription drug trade often span jurisdictions and work quickly, often with deadly effects. According to him, the biggest obstacle his department has seen is the search warrants and being able to catch dealers. 
An amendment to the law, supported by the State Board of Pharmacy is changing that. 
“Law enforcement, prescribers and pharmacists really have to work together on this problem,” said the board’s executive director John Clay Kirtley. 
The program only logs controlled substances, like narcotics and high schedule drugs. It includes information on when the prescription was filled, which doctor prescribed it and for what quantity. It also includes information on addresses to indicate if a person is moving several times a year. 
“So, I can look and see if someone is getting the same drug from different doctors, or going to different pharmacies,” Riley said. “We can also see if they’re moving from place to place and filling this prescriptions.” 
According to Kirtley and Lane, the program isn’t aimed at curbing or targeting those who have a legitimate need for the medications. And the access won’t be used to go on “fishing expeditions”. 
“We are targeting those who are trafficking drugs harming our children and the public,” Kirtley said. “We’ve seen that the trend of prescription abuse in this state has had horrific effects.” 
“Every inquiry into the system will be tracked,” Lane said. “And every inquiry has to have an associated case number to track it to a legitimate investigation.” 
Safeguards like that tracking capability and annual audits are coupled with training requirements to help the police but also protect privacy, Lane said. 
To gain access, Act 901 requires that the chief operating officer of an agency, like a police chief or sheriff, undergo certified training that is currently being developed. From there, officers who will be considered the agencies certified drug investigators will also be required to be trained and submit a form to gain access to the system and be issued a password that is tracked to that individual. 
Each chief officer acknowledges they bear the brunt of the responsibility for the activities under their watch. Misusing the system can be grounds not only for termination, Lane said,  but it is also a felony under the law. 
“Not just any officer who can shoot a gun on the side of the road will be using this system,” Lane said. “These will be specialized officers trained to do this work in their departments.” 
The training materials are in development and the software integration for law enforcement is already under way. Lane hopes to see the program for law enforcement stood up by January of next year. 
Stacey Riley thinks the program can help curb the problem she sees at the counter every day. 
“They can access that info and put stop to problem before it gets worse,” Riley said.
To follow this story and all of Marci Manley’s coverage, click here for Facebook or here for Twitter

Obamacare hikes as high as 60% for certain plans in certain locations for 2016

screwed1

Obamacare sticker shock: Big rate hikes proposed for 2016

http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/02/news/economy/obamacare-rates/index.html

obamacare rates up

Hold onto your wallets … many insurers want to substantially hike rates on Obamacare policies for 2016.

Many are proposing double-digit premium increases for individual policies, with some companies looking to boost rates more than 60%, according to a list posted Monday by the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

In Florida, for instance, United Healthcare (UNH) wants to raise the rates of plans sold on the Obamacare exchange by an average of 18%. Individual policies available outside the exchange through United Healthcare or through a broker would go up by 31%, on average, with hikes as high as 60% for certain plans in certain locations.

In Texas, insurer Scott & White is looking for a 32% increase for exchange-based plans, while Humana (HUM) is asking for an average 30% boost for its exclusive provider organization policies, which generally cover only in-network services.

Insurers say they want to hike rates because enrollees are going to the doctor, getting lab work and filling prescriptions more than they had originally anticipated.

“We’ve seen a great pent-up demand for services,” said Aaron Billger, spokesman for Highmark, a Blue Cross Blue Shield licensee offering plans in Pennsylvania, Delaware and West Virginia. Enrollees in Obamacare exchange plans use more healthcare than those in job-based policies, he noted.

Insurers submitted their proposed rate hikes for individual policies sold both on and off Obamacare exchanges for review by state officials. The government’s list includes insurers that requested increases of 10% or more. Insurers can opt to offer plans on the exchanges, directly or via both methods, but policies with similar coverage must be priced the same.

Rates for Obamacare plans have been closely watched — and their affordability hotly debated — since the exchanges first opened in 2014. Insurers had a tough time setting rates in the first two years because they didn’t have a lot of data on how much customers would visit the doctor. Now they can base their prices on actual usage, said David Axene, fellow at the Society of Actuaries, an industry group. Some insurers may have underestimated and set their prices too low in 2014 and 2015.

Related: 5 ways Obamacare has helped Americans

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina cited hospital in-patient care, particularly cancer and heart conditions, emergency room visits and specialty drugs as major contributors to its proposed 26% hike.

Insurers, however, probably won’t be granted all that they seek. Insurance commissioners in 36 states have the power to deny the rate requests, though they usually negotiate smaller hikes with insurers.

Also, the requested rate changes for 2016 can vary widely based on the specific plan. United Healthcare, for instance, noted it’s only asking for a 1.2% increase on some of its plans. This reinforces the need for consumers to shop around when open enrollment begins in November and not just renew their existing plan.

While the proposed rate hikes seem steep, they won’t hit Obamacare enrollees as hard since most receive federal subsidies. But even subsidized enrollees will have to pay more depending on the plan they select. Those signing up for individual coverage outside an exchange will pay full freight since they aren’t eligible for subsidies.

Rates will be finalized in coming weeks, but consumers may not learn the final prices until just before enrollment opens.

Former clients of Eric C. Conn file lawsuit in Floyd County in connection to suspension of disability payments

Former clients of Eric C. Conn file lawsuit in Floyd County in connection to suspension of disability payments

http://www.wkyt.com/wymt/home/headlines/Former-clients-of-Eric-C-Conn-file-lawsuit-against-him-in-Floyd-County-in-connection-to-suspension-of-disability-payments-305502241.html

PRESTONSBURG, Ky. (WYMT) – Two former clients of Floyd County lawyer Eric C. Conn filed a lawsuit against him Friday after the Social Security Administration suspended disability benefits for them and hundreds of others.

The plaintiffs – Cheryl and Robert Martin of Floyd County – are seeking class action status for the suit, claiming approximately 900 people received the same letters as they did from the SSA indicating their federal assistance is under review.

They claim Conn committed legal malpractice and violated the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act.

Attorney Ned Pillersdorf filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Martins in Floyd County Circuit Court. A copy of the suit is attached to this story.

Government investigators suspect fraudulent information was used by Conn to secure the benefits that have been suspended.

Conn has denied all the allegations and has not been charged.

Many of the folks whose disability payments are in limbo have told WYMT they do not know how they will survive financially without their benefits.

Pillersdorf said he plans on filing a suit against the Social Security Administration Monday.

We will have more details on this story on Mountain News at 11.

Who’s on board for a religious epiphany ?

IRS dubs First Church of Cannabis a nonprofit

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/06/02/first-church-of-cannabis/28364521/

INDIANAPOLIS — Emotions appeared to be sky high at the newly formed First Church of Cannabis after the Internal Revenue Service granted it nonprofit status.

The designation means donors can deduct gifts to the church on their federal tax returns if they itemize and the church is eligible for a property-tax exemption in Indiana. The organization has raised $10,905 in a gofundme.com solicitation but has not found a home yet.

“What a GLORIOUS DAY it is folks,” the founder and grand poohbah, Bill Levin, wrote May 26 in a Facebook post announcing the church’s IRS approval as 501 (c) (3) charitable organization. “WE ARE 100% a LEGAL CHURCH. … All say HALLELUJAH and SMILE REAL BIG! … We are OFFICIAL!”

The First Church of Cannabis may be the first tax-exempt religious organization focusing on pot, according to a search of IRS Form 990s on the IRS and GuideStar websites, which have information on returns filed in previous tax years.

Levin provided The Star with a copy of his notification from the IRS.

“You are qualified to receive tax deductible bequests, devises, transfers or gifts,” the letter, stamped May 21, read. “We determined that you are a public charity.”

What a GLORIOUS DAY it is folks… Absolutely BEAUTIFUL…HAPPY TUESDAY! Our NOT FOR PROFIT 501 C3 status came in…

Posted by The First Church of Cannabis on Tuesday, May 26, 2015

 Levin, who also calls himself the church’s minister of love, formed the organization this year partly as a means to test the Indiana’s new Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which bars the government from infringing on religious practices.

He plans his first official church service July 1, the day the law goes into effect. At the end of that first service, he plans to follow the blessing with a congregation-wide marijuana smoking.

Police here typically do not arrest people accused of petty offenses, such as smoking marijuana. If officers intervene, it’s likely Levin and church worshipers will get a ticket and a court date.

“Come on feet, we are doing a HAPPY DANCE.,” Levin wrote on the church’s Facebook feed, later saying that love without sexism is the cornerstone of the church.

Legal experts had said it was inevitable that someone would test the controversial religious freedom law, and Levin has said he was eager to see if police would pinch him for toking in church.

If Levin does go through with the ceremony and is prosecuted, he would need to prove to a judge that his church was a legitimate religion to get protection under the state’s religious-freedom act, said Robert Katz, a law professor at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law.

“One thing the court would look at is the history of the church,” Katz said. “Churches with a long established history would be looked at more favorably.”

While the Religious Freedom Restoration Act ostensibly was designed to protect religion from government infringement, it drew national attention when critics viewed it as a tool the potentially would allow business owners to refuse service to same-sex couples.