If you did your job like this.. would you keep your job ?

Heroin Addiction Epidemic on the Rise in the U.S.

http://www.kmbz.com/Heroin-Addiction-Epidemic-on-the-Rise-in-the-U-S-/21800119

A top federal drug enforcement official says the heroin addiction epidemic in the United States is the worst he’s ever seen.

More deaths occur every year from overdoses than gunshot wounds or car accidents.

Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Deputy Administrator Jack Riley says “Heroin can be found on virtually every corner of our country and places I’ve never see it before.”

Younger users are turning to the powerful drug because it can be snorted or smoked.

The DEA says that as the cost of prescription drugs have gone up, the price for heroin has gone down as more and more people look for a powerful high.

 

A $680,000 OPS ?

fm.burlingame.jpg

Lawsuit says Fred Meyer pharmacy error ‘significantly’ hurt woman’s chances of becoming pregnant

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2015/07/lawsuit_claims_fred_meyer_phar.html

A woman who says she had to be rushed to the emergency room after a Fred Meyer pharmacy employee gave her the wrong prescription drug — hurting her chances of one day having a baby — has filed a $680,000 lawsuit against the chain.

Anna Bell claims that she had presented the pharmacy at the Southwest Portland Barbur Boulevard store with a prescription for the fertility drug clomiphene. But instead, the pharmacy employee gave her a different drug that had a similarly spelled name.

That made a world of difference, according to Bell’s lawsuit, filed last week in Multnomah County Circuit Court.

After just one dose of the wrong drug, Bell suffered “severe bodily injuries” — prompting her to be rushed by ambulance to the hospital, where she was admitted, according to her suit. She suffered “severe pain, shock to her nervous system, sleeplessness, fear, nervousness, nausea, balance issues, altered consciousness” and other problems.

Her suit states that she had to stop fertility treatments while she was recovering from the pharmacy’s mistake and that the episode has “now significantly impacted her ability to conceive a child.”

Melinda Merrill, a spokeswoman for Fred Meyer, declined comment because of the  pending litigation. But Merrill offered this comment: “The safety and well-being of our pharmacy patients is our top priority, and we take any problems extremely seriously.”

Although Bell’s allegations have yet to be tried in court, pharmacy mistakes nationwide have been a long-standing concern.

In 2012, The Oregonian/OregonLive reported on an Oregon pharmacy board survey of about 1,300 respondents. Many complained of having to fill more prescriptions each day and long, intense shifts with few breaks. Some respondents expressed worry over the frequency of mistakes.

Roughly 52 percent of those who worked for chain pharmacies reported that they disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement “My employer provides a work environment that is conducive to providing safe and effective patient care.”

Bell’s lawsuit states that Bell picked up the prescription at Fred Meyer’s Burlingame store at 7555 S.W. Barbur Boulevard.

She seeks $30,000 in past and future medical bills; $150,000 for a grant she says she lost to continue research work at Oregon Health & Science University; and $500,000 for pain and suffering.

Hillsboro attorney M. Casey Gibbens is representing Bell. He couldn’t be reached comment Monday or Tuesday.

NEWS FLASH !

brightidea

Police: Pharmacy robberies directly related to rise in drug use

http://wlfi.com/2015/07/27/police-pharmacy-robberies-directly-related-to-rise-in-drug-use/

TIPPECANOE COUNTY, Ind. (WLFI) – According to U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency Data from January to May, Indiana has reported 68 pharmacy robberies. In 2014, the state saw 78 reports of the same kind of crime in the whole year.

West Lafayette Pharmacist Ben Rachwal said these crimes are the talk amongst his peers.

“We’re always very concerned about it,” Rachwal said. “When our safety is at risk we’re always concerned.”

Rachwal said there have been no robberies or attempted robberies at his pharmacy, CustomPlus Pharmacy, in the four years it’s been at its Navajo Street location.

However, he said there is a safety plan in place. He did not want to disclose the full plan for the safety of the staff.

“We do have panic buttons all over the store,” Rachwal said. “So, we’re just a push button away from the police.”

Police said the large number of pharmacy robberies is directly related to the rise in drug use.

“I think they’re definitely connected,” Lafayette Police Lt. Brian Gossard said. “Especially, with heroin you have that correlation between the heroin and the opiates that are prescribed.”

News 18 contacted Lafayette Police Crime Analyst Steve Hawthorne to see how many pharmacy robberies occurred in Tippecanoe County in 2015. He said his data is not broken down into specific places where the robberies happened.

However, Gossard said the department has worked three pharmacy robberies this year. All three were at the the CVS Pharmacy on Old U.S. 231. Police said all were committed by the same group of suspects, and drug use was the motive.

“I think there was that drug element,” Gossard said. “They were users and that was the avenue they chose.”

Gossard said if you’re at a pharmacy where a robbery occurs, be a good witness. That means do not try to intervene, try to get a good suspect description, and call police as soon as you can.

DOJ tries to interfere with independent OIG investigate rights

grassley_dojpaper_split.jpg

DOJ facing bipartisan criticism for move to ‘undermine’ gov’t watchdogs

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/27/lawmakers-inspector-general-rip-doj-move-to-deny-government-watchdogs-access-to/?intcmp=hpbt1

The Justice Department is facing bipartisan criticism for clamping down on government watchdogs’ access to documents, in a decision lawmakers say defies Congress and undermines those tasked with rooting out government misconduct. 

The DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel issued a 68-page memo last week that said the department’s inspector general would be required to get permission from the agencies it oversees to obtain wire taps, grand jury testimonies, and credit information. IGs are assigned to audit and conduct internal reviews of federal agencies. 

The decision, first reported in The Washington Post, faced an almost immediate backlash from Capitol Hill and the watchdogs themselves. 

“I strongly disagree with the OLC opinion,” DOJ Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz said in a statement. “Congress meant what it said when it authorized Inspectors General to independently access ‘all’ documents necessary to conduct effective oversight. … Without such access, our office’s ability to conduct its work will be significantly impaired.”

Horowitz is chairman of the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, the group that oversees IGs across the government. He said that the new rules would lead to waste, fraud and abuse. 

In Congress, Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Ron Johnson, R-Wis., as well as Reps. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and John Conyers, D-Mich., released a statement suggesting the new rules are a clear violation of the Inspector General Act of 1978.

 “If the Inspector General deems a document necessary to do his job, then the agency should turn it over immediately,” said Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. 

Grassley’s office said the DOJ already has denied or delayed IG access to records concerning inquiries into Operation Fast and Furious, alleged “sex parties” involving Drug Enforcement Administration agents and other issues. 

He added: “The clear command of that law is being ignored far too often by agencies across the executive branch. By this opinion’s tortured logic, ‘all records’ does not mean all records … The prospect of the Obama administration using this opinion to stonewall oversight, avoid accountability, and undermine the independence of inspectors general is alarming.”

Conyers also said that the IG “should not have to ask permission from the very agency he oversees.” He called the opinion a “departure from the plain text of the statute and the intent of Congress.” 

All four congressmen are in committees that oversee the DOJ.

DOJ spokeswoman Emily Pierce told the Washington Post that the ruling still allows IG investigators to get sensitive information, and that the department is doing its best to help agents. 

The DOJ has faced criticism in recent years for not turning over information to agents during investigations.

According to both Horowitz and the congressmen, the department has delayed or even blocked many high-profile inquiries. Forty-seven IGs also wrote a letter to Congress last year complaining that the agencies they oversee had refused to release vital information.

Horowitz said he intends to push Congress to pass legislation that would ensure inspectors general independent access to all vital information. 

“We look forward to working with Congress and the Justice Department to promptly remedy this serious situation,” he said. “The agency over which the OIG conducts oversight [should not be] in the position of deciding whether to give the OIG access to the information necessary to conduct the oversight.” 

ALWAYS make cops get a warrant.

The ruling upholds the idea that police officers can profile and detain people who aren’t actually committing any crimes.

Kingsville, TX — Last Thursday, the Fifth Circuit US Court of Appeals ruled that it is suspicious for a vehicle to have air fresheners, rosaries, or pro-police bumper stickers.The ruling stems from a 2011 Texas court case in which a couple was pulled over for having rosaries hanging from the rearview mirror, as well as a few air fresheners, and a DARE sticker on the back of the vehicle.

Thy were pulled over based on this stuff, searched and, of course, no drugs were found but they had money.The husband, unwidely, allowed the cops to search the car without a warrant.

Yeah, the cops stole that and arrested them. Because they can.

The ruling:

“We do have concerns that classifying pro-law enforcement and anti-drug stickers or certain religious imagery as indicators of criminal activity risks putting drivers in a classic ‘heads I win, tails you lose’ position. But we need not decide whether these items alone, or in combination with one another, amount to reasonable suspicion because we find the more suspicious evidence to be the array of air fresheners and inconsistencies in the driver’s responses to the officer’s basic questions. We have long recognized that the presence of air fresheners, let alone four of them placed throughout an SUV, suggests a desire to mask the odor of contraband.”

War on Drugs again.Cops desiring more ways around the 4th Amendment.

This just has to stop, but it is such a lucrative, easy scam and one that crushes minorities extra hard, law enforcement just can’t give it up.

ALWAYS make cops get a warrant.

Tell them they do NOT have your permission to search anything and make them get a warrant if they are so sure there’s something wrong.

If you have any significant cash, they will take it and you will have to go through hell to get it back.

empty words or meaningful promises ?

click on image to enlarge

img20150727_0060

Their profits – your health/safety – guess which one they chose

Drug Makers May Delay Reporting Patient Harms to FDA: Study

http://consumer.healthday.com/public-health-information-30/drug-safety-news-741/drug-companies-sometimes-delay-reports-of-patient-harms-to-fda-study-701680.html

MONDAY, July 27, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Drug companies may be endangering the lives of patients by not promptly reporting cases of drug-related illness or death to federal regulators, a new report suggests.

About 10 percent of cases where a drug does serious harm to a person are not reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration within the required 15-day period, the new analysis reveals.

Worse, it appears that drug makers are more likely to delay reporting if a patient death is involved, said senior study author Pinar Karaca-Mandic, an associate professor of health policy and management at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health.

“A larger fraction of these serious and unexpected events that involved a patient death were delayed — about 12 percent of events with patient death, compared to 9 percent of events without patient death,” Karaca-Mandic said.

Drug makers delayed filing more than 40,000 reports that involved patient death between 2004 and 2014, researchers found. They also delayed reporting nearly 120,000 events that did not involve a patient death.

The analysis was published online July 27 as a research letter in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.

“Everyone wants to be sure the drugs we’re taking are safe, and it is the FDA’s role to make sure the drugs we’re taking are safe,” said Dr. Rita Redberg, chief editor of the journal and a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. “If adverse event reports are getting filed late, that means safety warnings are delayed and more people are taking dangerous drugs without knowing it.”

For this report, researchers pored through a decade’s worth of data from the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System, eventually reviewing more than 1.6 million reports. About 95 percent of these reports come from drug companies, the authors noted in background information.

They found that drug manufacturers promptly report within the required 15-day period close to 91 percent of cases that do not involve patient deaths, and almost 87 percent of cases that do involve a death.

But the remaining cases were reported late, often by months.

“What was also surprising was that typically these were not delays of just a few days,” Karaca-Mandic said. “For example, among events that involved a patient death, about 6 percent were reported within 16 to 90 days, about 3 percent within 91 to 180 days, and about 3 percent were delayed more than 180 days.”

Redberg added that it’s very likely that the problem is much worse than spelled out in this study.

“Although they reviewed well over 1 million adverse events, it’s estimated that only 2 percent of all adverse events ever get reported to the FDA,” she said.

A spokesperson for PhRMA, an organization that represents the pharmaceutical industry, said, “Patient safety is the highest priority for biopharmaceutical companies, which diligently submit hundreds of thousands of safety reports to the FDA every year.”

“It is important to remember that prior to reporting any adverse event, including serious unexpected adverse events, companies must investigate the reports that they receive from patients and health care professionals,” the spokesperson added. “Companies typically verify the accuracy of patient and physician reports, and often contact adverse event reporters to supplement the information that they provide to the FDA.”

Karaca-Mandic said the FDA relies on these reports to inform consumers about safety problems that crop up after a drug hits the market, and the agency has the power to revoke a drug’s approval or suspend drug sales if the manufacturer fails to promptly report adverse events.

Instead, the agency typically issues warning letters to companies that are dragging their feet, the authors said.

Karaca-Mandic cited a May 26, 2010, letter to Pfizer Inc. in which the FDA rapped the knuckles of the pharmaceutical giant for reporting delays ranging from nine months to more than three years late.

In another letter to Actelion Pharmaceuticals U.S. Inc. on Sept, 14, 2010, the FDA cited the manufacturer’s “failure to report approximately 3,500 patient deaths,” she added.

The FDA needs to step up its enforcement of reporting requirements, Redberg said in an editorial accompanying the study.

“We need to be able to depend on the FDA to monitor safety of our drugs once they’re approved, especially because the FDA is moving toward faster and faster drug approval, which means that we are depending more and more on this post-market reporting,” she said.

FDA spokesman Christopher Kelly said the agency had not yet reviewed the study and had no comment on the findings.

Consumers and physicians also can take matters into their own hands and report adverse reports directly to the FDA, rather than going through the drug company, Redberg added.

“Most of the adverse events are getting reported to the manufacturer, and they’re supposed to report to the FDA,” she said. “As there are these delays, it seems better to have people report directly to the FDA.”

when in Rome… do as the Romans

pencam

http://www.amazon.com/U-Guard-Security-Products%C2%AE-Executive-Surveillance/dp/B00NQ8353W/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&qid=1437963981&sr=8-13&keywords=video+pen

In case you haven’t noticed… over the last 15 yrs or so… it is extremely hard to be out in public and not being videoed …some times just video.. sometimes video and audio..  I remember years ago, when I bought a cell phone that was capable of taking pictures/videos…  The particular model I wanted came that way… I thought that it was one of the dumbest option to ever be put on a cell phone. BUT… a few days later I was having to repair something that required disconnecting several wires… and out comes the cell phone to take a PICTURE of the wires before I disassemble the wiring so I wouldn’t have remember – or guess – how to connect the new part. So much for a dumb idea and cell phones.

It would seem that even the smallest stores have video cameras in their establishment… years ago.. video cameras were put in cop cars… now we are putting video cameras ON COPS

If you have noticed that when you are within the judicial system.. interrogations are videoed…. depositions are videos… many court room trials are videos

I was in a big box store recently and saw where they were selling videos to be installed on the dash of your car and they were like $40

It would seem that our society has become so unlawful and deceitful that the only way that we know the truth about many issues.. is the video playback. Some memories are not good… other memories are not good INTENTIONALLY.

Those states that have two party recording rules.. those rules were written before the existence of today’s technology and they generally reference “private  conversation”… which when these rules were written… your basic private conversation was on a wired land line.

Generally, I think that it would be a very long stretch to claim that a conversation at the Rx counter… would be considered “private”… and after all the store is probably videoing you as you stand there at the register.

It has already been proven time and again that some cops will break laws… lie about doing so… unless there is a video…  Can all professionals be trusted to be totally honest ?

When in Rome and you are being videoed … to be sure that there will be a video that can be played back at a later date… shouldn’t that be the video from your perspective ?

safe and timely access to lawful and lawfully prescribed medications

AG prevails in landmark case in federal appeals court | Washington Attorney General

http://www.courierherald.com/news/318447781.html#

I am not an attorney, but… I try to apply common sense to what I read.. although the law and common sense doesn’t always seem to occupy the same space and at the same time… this court ruling is at the FEDERAL COURT LEVEL…  this phrase could be applied to all lawfully prescribed medications safe and timely access to lawful and lawfully prescribed medications.  This may end up being taken all the way to the Supreme Court or this ruling may only apply to the Ninth Circuit.. which I believe is the NW of the USA.  Almost every major court ruling has unintended consequences some good .. some bad… for the chronic pain community and those with subjective disease issues.. this could be a game changer and rewrite the rules of the game 🙂
In a closely watched case with significant repercussions, including for women’s reproductive rights, the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals today agreed with the Attorney General’s Office’s that pharmacies must follow state rules to give patients timely access to medications.

“This unanimous decision is a major victory for the people of Washington. Decisions regarding medical care — including reproductive rights — are appropriately between a patient and his or her medical professionals,” Attorney General Bob Ferguson said.

In its unanimous decision, a three-judge panel reversed the lower court ruling in Stormans v. Wiesman, in which a pharmacy owner and two pharmacists challenged Washington rules requiring pharmacies to fill lawful prescriptions.

The plaintiffs refuse to provide certain prescriptions for emergency contraceptives based on their religious beliefs. For example, the pharmacy at Ralph’s Thriftway in Olympia, owned by plaintiff Kevin Stormans, turned away dozens of women seeking emergency contraceptives. The state argued that the rules comply with the First Amendment and ensure that Washington residents have timely access to necessary medications.

In its ruling today, the appellate court agreed with the Attorney General’s Office that the state rules are neutral and generally applicable, because they apply to everyone regardless of their motivation. The court also agreed that the state has a legitimate interest in ensuring that Washingtonians have safe and timely access to lawful and lawfully prescribed medications.

The court noted: “The rules also permit a religiously objecting individual pharmacist to deny delivery, so long as another pharmacist working for the pharmacy provides timely delivery.”

This case, formerly known as Stormans v. Selecky, has a long history. The rules at issue were adopted by the Washington Board of Pharmacy in 2007, after a lengthy process of discussion and public comment.

Stormans, of Ralph’s Thriftway, and two pharmacists who work elsewhere sued in federal court shortly after the rules were adopted. The plaintiffs objected to stocking and dispensing the emergency contraceptives Plan B and ella.

At the trial level, Judge Ronald B. Leighton of the federal District Court for the Western District of Washington had concluded that the rules violated the First Amendment by impinging on the plaintiffs’ exercise of their religion, and he issued a preliminary injunction blocking the rules from being enforced.

The state appealed, and in 2009 the Ninth Circuit reversed the preliminary injunction, concluding that the rules did not discriminate on the basis of religion and thus should be reviewed under the “rational basis” test, which asks whether the state has any rational basis for the rules. The Ninth Circuit sent the case back to Judge Leighton for review under this standard.

Judge Leighton concluded, however, that rational basis review did not apply, and in 2012 conducted a trial regarding the rules. Although nothing about the rules had changed since the Ninth Circuit’s 2009 ruling and the rules had not been enforced in the interim, Judge Leighton again concluded that the rules violated the First Amendment by impinging on the plaintiffs’ exercise of their religion.

The state appealed that decision in 2012. That appeal is the subject of today’s unanimous ruling written by Judge Susan P. Graber, appointed in 1998 by President Clinton, and joined by Judge Richard R. Clifton, appointed in 2002 by President George W. Bush, and Judge Mary H. Murguia, appointed in 2011 by President Obama.

Woman sues Rite Aid after medication mixup

dennismillerbook2

Woman sues Rite Aid after medication mixup

http://wvrecord.com/stories/510630080-woman-sues-rite-aid-after-medication-mixup

CHARLESTON – A Fayette County woman is suing Rite Aid of West Virginia Inc. after she claims it gave her the wrong medication and caused her injuries and damages. Virginia Tucker was issued a prescription for Doxepin 10mg from her physician for depression and anxiety and went to Rite Aid to get the prescription filled, according to a complaint filed in Kanawha Circuit Court.

Tucker claims Rite Aid gave her a one-month supply of Carbidopa-Levodopa 10, instead of her prescribed medication.

The plaintiff was receiving treatment for cerebral palsy, depression and anxiety when she was prescribed the wrong medication, which was not safe for her to ingest, according to the suit.

Tucker claims the medication she was given was for Parkinson’s disease and experienced weakness, blurred vision and headaches, which she sought treatment for.

The defendant notified Tucker of the incorrect medication when she went to refill her prescription on July 26, 2013, according to the suit.

Tucker claims the defendant’s negligence caused her injury and damages.

The defendant also breached its contract with Tucker by giving her the wrong medication, according to the suit.

Tucker is seeking compensatory damages. She is being represented by William M. Tiano of Tiano O’Dell PLLC.

The case is assigned to Circuit Judge Joanna Tabit.