#Walgreen Pharmacists FED UP with working with little/no ancillary help ?

Customers frustrated by Walgreens pharmacy closures, long lines

http://www.wwmt.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/Customers-frustrated-by-Walgreens-pharmacy-closures-long-lines-220270.shtml#.ViKu3SsSWQw

KALAMAZOO, Mich. (NEWSCHANNEL 3) – Walgreens pharmacy locations around Kalamazoo and Battle Creek have been struggling to stay open, and customers say they are frustrated by closures and long lines.

We’ve been hearing from a lot of viewers in emails and on Facebook wondering why their Walgreens pharmacies were closed at seemingly random times in the day.

So on Friday, we went to the company to find out.

Walgreens customers in Kalamazoo and Battle Creek tell us they have been seeing signs of late telling them that their pharmacy was closed at time when it should be open.

“You never would see it coming, all of a sudden there’s pieces of paper on the walls where they were saying we will not be open after six o’clock tonight, and that was because they couldn’t get a pharmacy on duty,” said customer Dennis Martin.

Martin says over the last few weeks, his pharmacy location in Battle Creek has had frequent closures and when it was open, there were long lines.

We found the pharmacy was open, but there was a hefty line on Friday night.

At other Walgreens locations we visited Friday, the pharmacies were open.

Walgreens told Newschannel 3 that they are trying to deal with a problem, which is affecting specific locations in Battle Creek and Kalamazoo.

A spokesperson for the company told us:

“We currently have an unusual situation with a number of our pharmacists on leave at the same time. As a result, our pharmacy hours in a few locations have intermittently been reduced.”

He says Walgreens is trying to fix the problem by bringing in pharmacists from Grand Rapids and Detroit, and says hours should be back to normal in the next few days.

The company added that due to privacy concerns, they could not say why so many pharmacists were taking leave at the same time.

Have you ever felt like the government doesn’t really care what you think?

Have you ever felt like the government doesn’t really care what you think?

Professors Martin Gilens (Princeton University) and Benjamin I. Page (Northwestern University) looked at more than 20 years worth of data to answer a simple question: Does the government represent the people?

Their study took data from nearly 2000 public opinion surveys and compared it to the policies that ended up becoming law. In other words, they compared what the public wanted to what the government actually did. What they found was extremely unsettling: The opinions of 90% of Americans have essentially no impact at all.

This video gives a quick rundown of their findings — it all boils down to one simple graph:

Princeton University study: Public opinion has “near-zero” impact on U.S. law.

Gilens & Page found that the number of Americans for or against any idea has no impact on the likelihood that Congress will make it law.

“The preferences of the average American appear to have only a miniscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.”

One thing that does have an influence? Money. While the opinions of the bottom 90% of income earners in America have a “statistically non-significant impact,” Economic elites, business interests, and people who can afford lobbyists still carry major influence.

Nearly every issue we face as a nation is caught in the grip of corruption.

Explainer_prob4

From taxation to national debt, education to the economy, America is struggling to address our most serious issues. Moneyed interests get what they want, and the rest of us pay the price.

They spend billions influencing America’s government. We give them trillions in return.

Explainer_prob3

In the last 5 years alone, the 200 most politically active companies in the US spent $5.8 billion influencing our government with lobbying and campaign contributions.

Those same companies got $4.4 trillion in taxpayer support — earning a return of 750 times their investment.

It’s a vicious cycle of legalized corruption.

Explainer_prob2

As the cost of winning elections explodes, politicians of both political parties become ever more dependent on the tiny slice of the population who can bankroll their campaigns.

To win a Senate seat in 2014, candidates had to raise $14,351 every single day. Just .05% of Americans donate more than $10,000 in any election, so it’s perfectly clear who candidates will turn to first, and who they’re indebted to when they win.

In return for campaign donations, elected officials pass laws that are good for their mega-donors, and bad for the rest of us.

Explainer_prob1

Our elected officials spend 30-70% of their time in office fundraising for the next election. When they’re not fundraising, they have no choice but to make sure the laws they pass keep their major donors happy — or they won’t be able to run in the next election.

All your troubles starts at the ballot box

Your choice is irrevocable in 31 states

http://ballotpedia.org/Laws_governing_recall_in_Florida

The Florida laws governing recall pertain to certain elected local officials, as determined by Florida Statute Annotated §100.361. Not all elected local officials are eligible for recall in Florida. Those eligible must have been elected to a governing body of a municipality or chartered county.[1] Twenty of Florida’s 67 counties are charter counties.[2]

Florida recall law does not pertain to elected state officials, such as the governor, nor elected federal officials, such as the state’s congressional delegates. Compared to Florida:

  • Nineteen states, or 38% of all states, allow for the recall of elected state officials.
  • FourteenThirty-four states, or 68% of all states, allow for the recall of elected local officials. This includes Florida. states, or 28% of all states, do not provide for recall of any elected officials.

Everything that we – as citizens of the USA – have to deal with is directly/indirectly a result of who is elected at the ballot box

The STATES initially set up the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT… now it would seem that the FEDS have decided that they are the ones in charge.  Congress sets up rules for everyone and then EXEMPTS themselves from the same rules and or makes different/better rules for themselves.

The US President, nominates the head of DOJ, members of Supreme Court, EPA….and on and on… while the Senate has to confirm the nomination(s)  most get confirmed…

State Governor appts members to the likes of Board of Pharmacies.. the State Attorney General gets to decide which major laws or violators of laws get enforced.

In Congress, if you are not part of the majority party and have some seniority… you are basically at the end of the food chain.. you can try to submit a bill… it may not get heard by any committee nor brought to the floor for a vote..

With Congress having approval ratings in the SINGLE DIGITS.. isn’t it time that a group that has a common interest for a viable third party…or.. organize around an existing third party – like the libertarian party that wants smaller, less intrusive government.

Unless you attempt to influence the bureaucratic system, it will dominate your life. Influence usually can be approached with a budget as little as a 100 million dollars or 100 million votes.

dogsledIf you individually believe that only one political party is the right one for you… then you will be like a member of a dog sled team.. unless you are the lead dog… the view never changes…

Since there is only about 30,000 households in the US with a net worth of at least 100 million…  most people can have more influence in attempting to organize like minds into a voting pool for a single candidate or party

 

Your right to pursue life, liberty, happiness is being challenged… unhealthy need not apply ?

Police testing new roadside drug tests

Look at the list of drugs below that this saliva test can test for.. according to this report 40% of people killed on the highway HAVE DRUGS IN THEIR SYSTEM…. 22% of all drivers tested HAD DRUGS IN THEIR SYSTEM..  NINE of the TWELVE drugs listed below can be LEGALLY PRESCRIBED/TAKEN and the test apparently tests for the PRESENCE OF THESE DRUGS IN A PERSON’S SYSTEM..

Just how many chronic pain pts could actually pass a road side agility/sobriety test given their pain and neuro/muscular/skeleton problems.  I can see most unable to walk a straight line, stand on one foot… finger to touch tip of nose… might be doable.. if their pain doesn’t hinder them.

IMO.. we are not just approaching a slippery slope, we are on the cusp of a grazed/iced over steep downhill grade. If we are going to arrest or send anyone to a hospital for further testing based on any quantity of legal drugs in a person’s system…  Then we need to lower the illegal BAL to anything above ZERO… or lets go back to the 18th Amendment and make the sales of alcohol ILLEGAL again… or just repeal the 21st Amendment.

http://www.wtvq.com/2015/10/14/police-testing-new-roadside-drug-tests/

roadside drug tests

http://oralsalivascan.com/

LEXINGTON, Ky. (WTVQ) – Some police departments in Kentucky are trying a new device to try and prove if a driver is high behind the wheel and help combat the growing trend of drugged driving.

The numbers of drugged drivers is alarming. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 40% of all drivers killed has drugs in their system. The NHTSA also did a roadside survey that showed 22% of all drivers tested positive for drugs.

To help prosecute drugged drivers in the state, Kentucky’s Office of Highway Safety is partnering with authorities in Louisville, Paducah and Madison County to test portable kits that police officers could eventually carry into the field to test drivers for controlled substances.

The kits use a suspect’s saliva to test a panel of 10 different drugs that are most commonly used in Kentucky.

If the tests prove reliable, lawmakers say they will consider legislation next year to expand their use.

According to Kentucky State Police, authorities suspected that drugs were a factor in nearly 1,600 traffic collisions across the state last year, resulting in 939 injuries and 214 deaths.

Drug Name Symbol Negative Positive Not Tested
Alcohol ALC ❑ ❑ ❑
Amphetamine AMP ❑ ❑ ❑
Buprenorphine BUP ❑ ❑ ❑
Benzodiazepine BZO ❑ ❑ ❑
Cocaine COC ❑ ❑ ❑
EDDP EDDP ❑ ❑ ❑  Methadone metabolite
Marijuana THC ❑ ❑ ❑
Methadone MTD ❑ ❑ ❑
Methamphetamine MET ❑ ❑ ❑
Opiates OPI ❑ ❑ ❑
Oxycodone OXY ❑ ❑ ❑
Phencyclidine PCP ❑ ❑ ❑ PCP

I thought that #CVS was going to start selling Naloxone without a Rx ?

Police save man overdosing at CVS 

http://www.eagletribune.com/news/merrimack_valley/police-save-man-overdosing-at-cvs/article_2947df67-3d4d-59d8-befc-1a44a7b33d5c.html

I guess that having insurance coverage and/or CASH… was left out of those press releases about making Naloxone readily available in their stores. Maybe the Pharmacist was “NOT COMFORTABLE” dispensing/selling the Naloxone or believes that addicts deserve whatever they get from abusing some substance.

NORTH ANDOVER — A response to an abandoned 911 call resulted in the save of an overdose victim for North Andover police last week at the CVS on Turnpike Street. 

According to North Andover Police Lt. E.J. Foulds, Officer Mark Wilson responded to the CVS, 110 Turnpike St., at 3:45 p.m. on Oct. 8 after police received an alarming phone call from a pharmacist inside the store.

 “The pharmacist said a male had come into the store and asked to buy Narcan because his friend was not breathing,” Foulds said Wednesday. “The pharmacist was alarmed and called 911.” 

But the phone call became disconnected, and Wilson traveled to the CVS to investigate, according to Foulds. Upon his arrival, Wilson located the male who entered the store and his friend, a 39-year-old male who was experiencing an overdose in the store parking lot. 

“Officer Wilson radioed in an overdose and began preparing his nasal Narcan to administer to the victim,” Foulds said. “Lawrence (General Hospital) paramedics heard his call over the radio and also arrived to help.” 

Wilson administered the Narcan, while paramedics monitored the victim’s breathing. After several minutes, the victim regained consciousness and was transported to Lawrence General. The victim’s friend was not taken to the hospital, according to Foulds. 

Foulds applauded Wilson’s quick thinking and immediate action, which resulted in a positive outcome from a possible tragic situation.  

“He responded to a 911 call that was dropped and didn’t know what was going on,” Foulds said. “He quickly identified the problem and saved a man’s life.” 

Wilson’s save was the third by North Andover police within the last month. In September, police and firefighters revived two overdose victims by administering Narcan, the drug which reverses the symptoms of an overdose. 

 

More 20th century solutions to catch 21 st century criminals

Elected officials, DEA consider solutions to heroin epidemic

http://www.timesonline.com/news/health/elected-officials-dea-consider-solutions-to-heroin-epidemic/article_adf5542e-738e-11e5-9d44-9bf79084f47c.html

PITTSBURGH — As overdose deaths increase across the country, elected officials and law enforcement agencies are recognizing a need for action and legislation that addresses the epidemic of opioid abuse.

In order to introduce a new act aimed to stop rampant use of prescription medication in Pennsylvania, Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Zionsville, with the help of Sen. Bob Casey, D-Scranton, held a investigatory hearing Thursday afternoon at Allegheny General Hospital. Several area addiction experts and health care professionals testified to their experience in dealing with heroin and opioid abuse before an auditorium crowded with doctors, parents and community members.

At the start of the hearing, Toomey cited a widely accepted statistic that claims eight in 10 heroin users started abusing prescription medication before turning to street drugs. That statistic has lead to increasing overdose deaths have across the entire country. Pennsylvania ranked seventh in most overdose deaths last year in the United States, Toomy said. Ohio ranked eighth, and West Virginia had the highest number of overdose deaths, he said.

In order to address the epidemic impacting the tri-state region, Toomey has proposed a three-pronged approach to fighting the heroin epidemic — stopping the diversion of prescription medications, stopping the over-prescription of controlled substances and providing effective treatment to those addicted to opioid-based drugs.

Toomey, along with Sens. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, Rob Portman, R-Ohio, and Time Kaine, D-Va., introduced the Stopping Medication Abuse and Protecting Seniors Act, aimed to combat doctor and pharmacy shopping for prescription medication.

At-risk beneficiaries are identified and locked into using one prescriber and one pharmacy to prevent individuals from obtaining multiple prescriptions for controlled substances. Toomey believes this will also improve patient care by identifying those battling addiction, ultimately helping their physician to lead them to effective substance abuse treatment.

The proposed prevention initiative already exists in Medicaid and commercial health care plans, but is not a part of Medicare Part D, which assists in coverage for prescription medication, and Medicare Advantage.

Supporters of the proposal estimate it could save taxpayers between $79 and $115 million over 10 years by eliminating fraudulent prescription payments from Medicare. It will also allow data sharing between Medicare and Medicaid ensures and contractors to avoid “waste, fraud and abuse.”

The second part of the act, which aims to protect older Americans, ensures seniors who need high amounts of pain medication are not “inappropriately” prevented from access to their prescriptions.

Individuals receiving hospice care, as well as those in long-term care facilities, will also be exempt from the lock-in, Toomey said.

Dr. Shari Ling, deputy chief medical officer for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), testified at the hearing about quality health care for patients across CMS, as well as the accessibility and coverage of naloxone, a drug that reverses the side effects of an opioid overdose.

Several local officials also testified at the hearing, including Dr. Neil Capretto, medical director for Gateway Rehabilitation Center, Eugene Vittone, district attorney of Washington County, Ashely Potts of the Crisis Stabilization and Diversion Unit, and Dr. A. Jack Kabazie, systems director for the pain medicine division of the Allegheny Health Network.

Dovetailing with Toomey’s proposal is a new initiative taking place in Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) branches across the state.

Special Agent in Charge Gary Tuggle of the DEA’s Philadelphia Field Division announced a new initiative Thursday at the Pittsburgh field office in Kennedy Township. In addition to regulation and enforcement, agents across the country will focus on community outreach, education and prevention.

Tuggle said the department also is aggressively investigating pharmacies and physicians which over prescribe prescription medications. As Pennsylvania awaits an already approved prescription-monitoring program, Tuggle said agents rely on traditional investigations and often find fraudulent physicians and pharmacies through tips made to the department. He said it is critical that statewide monitoring programs are able to communicate across state lines to insure individuals can’t fill prescriptions simply by traveling outside of their home state.

While he expects U.S. attorneys across the country will continue to strongly prosecute offenders, he said the DEA can’t “arrest” their way out of the epidemic. As part of the department’s goal toward education and prevention, Tuggle said local DEA agents are working to de-stigmatize addiction and help people through prevention and treatment.

The DEA anticipated creating non-traditional partnerships with health care providers and schools throughout Pennsylvania.

Former Ins Exec… now Gov Mass… self declared medical expert ?

Governor Charlie Baker.

congressstupid

Baker bill looks to address scourge of opioid abuse

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/10/15/baker-unveil-opioid-bill-looking-address-crisis/JY30aFl1N5sQlHz4kKSRiL/story.html

Just imagine giving a pt a “72 hr supply” of a opiate/pain management on Thursday or Friday and it is insufficient and they run out over the weekend… so that they end up at a ER… being tagged as a “drug seeker” and even if they aren’t turned away.. there is the ER charge for a couple of days extra of pain management, because “the state” wants to play doctor with no medical training/experience.

Remember there is no educational, other required experience or even COMMON SENSE… to be an elected bureaucrat and it appears to hold true for most of  those elected politicians in MASS.

Governor Charlie Baker, facing a deadly scourge of prescription drug and heroin abuse, proposed Thursday to place new limits on how many opioid painkillers doctors and dentists can prescribe to a patient.

Looking to help stanch addiction where it often begins, the bill would limit practitioners to prescribing no more than a 72-hour supply of opioids to patients the first time they prescribe an opioid to them, with exceptions only for certain emergencies.

But the plan, embedded in a wide-ranging legislative package, immediately drew concern from doctors in the state.

“The problem there is it doesn’t necessarily allow for the clinical judgment of physicians — to adjust their prescriptions for different patients with different situations,” said Dr. Dennis Dimitri, president of the Massachusetts Medical Society, which represents more than 25,000 physicians and medical students.

He expressed worry about the “unintended difficulties and consequences” of the prescription-limiting provision.

At a State House news conference, Baker acknowledged that the prescribing limit is controversial but said he has heard far too many stories in recent years of people who come from a doctor’s office, a dental visit, or the hospital with 30 or 60 tablets of opioid drugs, when a handful would do.

A former health insurance company executive, Baker said he has lots of friends and colleagues in the health care world. “I am astonished,” the Republican said, “by the casual nature and the casual attitude that I find when I talk to them about these medications and these issues. And that has got to change. Period.”

Dr. Sarah Wakeman, a Massachusetts General Hospital physician who served on Baker’s Opioid Working Group, which delivered a lengthy set of recommendations in June, described a rationale behind the prescribing limit push. She said drug addiction is a disease and, as in dealing with other disease, prevention works.

“We prevent diabetes by limiting exposure to foods and beverages. We prevent lung cancer by limiting exposure to tobacco smoke,” she said at the news conference. So the proposed opioid prescription limit “will help to minimize excessive exposure to opioids.”

The governor’s legislation would also strengthen a prescription monitoring program, requiring every practitioner to check a database before writing a new opioid prescription; increase education about the drugs for athletic coaches, parents, and physicians; and give hospitals new power to force treatment on substance abusers who pose a danger to themselves or others.

Early reviews of the bill from several powerful figures in the state were positive. US Senator Edward J. Markey, a Democrat, commended Baker for the bill. State Senate President Stanley C. Rosenberg and House Speaker Robert A. DeLeo, also Democrats, released warm statements about the legislation.

And in a clear nod to the bipartisan effort to address the crisis, Steven A. Tolman, the president of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO and a sometimes Baker antagonist, stood directly to Baker’s right during the news conference. In remarks, Tolman, a longtime advocate on issues of substance abuse, underscored his support for the governor’s effort to address the scourge.

Lora M. Pellegrini, president and chief executive of the Massachusetts Association of Health Plans, which represents 17 health insurers in the state, praised Baker for leading on the issue of opioid addiction.

“There are a lot of important provisions here that we are quite positive about,” she said of the bill. Among them is the prescribing limits. Pellegrini said the data show a lot of heroin users start with opioid prescription drugs, and the prescription-limiting effort might help reduce the amount of those drugs on the street.

The governor also proposed ending the practice of sending women struggling with addiction — who are found by a court to pose an immediate risk of harm to themselves or others — to a Framingham prison when treatment beds are full.

Jessie Rossman, a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, which has brought a lawsuit on behalf of women civilly committed to the prison, said she is reviewing the legislation and hopes any bill that becomes law will actually accomplish the goal of ending the practice.

She also said the ACLU is carefully reviewing Baker’s push to give hospitals new power to force treatment on substance abusers who pose a danger to themselves or others for up to 72 hours — and offered a note of concern about any effort that can deprive people of their liberties.

Baker’s proposal would parallel existing law that permits a 72-hour period of involuntary treatment when a physician determines a person suffers from mental illness and poses a serious risk of harm.

Baker acknowledged that the involuntary commitment for addiction treatment provision is also controversial, but said he thinks it is the right thing to do.

“That 72-hour period is an opportunity to help folks find their way to a better path,” he said.

The Senate has already passed its own bill this fall, focused on steering people away from addiction through education and prevention. Baker’s bill, along with efforts by the House, may be melded into a single legislative package, in the months ahead. Passage of a comprehensive package, in one form or another, is likely.

Baker, who took office in January, has made a wide-ranging state government response to the crisis a centerpiece of his agenda.

Massachusetts has recently seen a stunning rise in unintentional opioid overdose deaths. The state Department of Public Health said this year that an estimated 1,256 Massachusetts residents died from opioid overdoses in 2014, a sharp increase from 2013 and 2012.

Joshua Miller can be reached at joshua.miller@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @jm_bos and subscribe to his weekday e-mail update on politics at bostonglobe.com/politicalhappyhour

Pain Nation with Ken McKim – Episode 3: Joey Aquilino

https://youtu.be/W0g9v7iSGEQ

One #CVS district has lost 20 RPH’s in SIX MONTHS – Health is everything ?

stevemailbox

My inbox today !!!

From: DTadlock98@aol.com
To: larry.merlo@cvscaremark.com, david.denton@cvsaremark.com, helena.foulkes@cvscaremark.com, jonathan.roberts@cvscaremark.com, thomas.moriarty@cvscaremark.com, Stephen.Gold@cvscaremark.com, Lisa.Bisaccia@cvscaremark.com, Per.Lofberg@cvscaremark.com, scott.baker@cvscaremark.com, Gloria.Rakaczki@CVSHealth.com, Dave.purdy@cvscaremark.com
CC: DTadlock98@aol.com
Sent: 10/13/2015 7:27:21 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: why I left CVS after 10 years

 

10-11-15

 

To who it may concern:

 

I feel compelled to share the reasons why I left CVS after 10 years so that the same mistakes may be prevented in the future. My last day was Oct. 2nd. I was a dedicated, loyal TSM for the company and had always told everyone I would retire with CVS. That is how much I loved my job. Over my career I attended P1/P2 classes, roundtable discussions with Operations from corporate, regional test store/trainer with roll out of mySchedule, Paragon winner, best district shrink award, LP MVP winner twice, and received store sales execution award.

 

I have worked hard and given my all to move forward in my development and goal to become a DM with CVS Health. On two separate occasions, I had been told by my HRBP  that I would have to have a college degree in order to be considered for a DM position. I was even told in a district meeting in front of my peers (21 mgrs, field staff and the FTM were all present and can corroborate) he later denied saying this!

 

Last January, I was added to the foundations of leadership class by my old DM,Colleen Serran but was removed from list by regional and hrbp for not having a college degree. In the past few months, numerous emails have been sent out by my new DM  wanting names of any staff with a college degree ( I still have the emails) It is a shame to be discriminated against for my education level and that my 10 years of experience with this company and the 20+ years in retail did not factor in.

 

Upon giving my resignation to my DM last week, I was told “good luck if I thought I could do better”. No attempt to try to keep me, no contact from HRBP or regional manager, in the very least for an exit interview. This just goes hand in hand with the lack of engagement and lack of concern to get to the truth of employee turnover.
*today 10-13 the hrbp did finally reach out to me after 11 days

 

Everyone thinks I left CVS to go work for my old boss. This could not be further from the truth.  Ever since she has left I have been labeled “one of her people”. If CVS had given me the opportunity to be in the EL program and foundations class, I would have stayed, as my goal has always been to become a DM or FTM with CVS.  Over the years, I had passed up numerous job opportunities because I loved CVS and was valued by my supervisor. When she left all that changed. So, when an interview opportunity came available a couple of weeks ago, what did I have to lose by going and listening?

 

Since turning in my resignation, I have had 4 dm’s contact me and express shock that I have left and how they would have loved if I had worked for them. That should speak volumes. I had become a resource not only for the district but for the region. My reputation is impeccable. Sad that the RM classified me by my old boss and did not treat me as an individual.

 

The current DM, has numerous issues with communication. There is a lack of email communication, directions and some stores go months without seeing or hearing from him. I, as TSM, most recently went 22 days without hearing from him. He did not communicate meeting agenda plans or topics with me. At the last meeting , my name came up on screen for 30 minutes to discuss training. He told me in front of everyone “I know I didn’t tell you I scheduled you time to talk, but if you don’t then we can get out of here 30 minutes earlier.” How does a TSM even reply to a statement like that? Needless to say based on the looks on my peers faces, we went home 30 minutes early.

 

Upon arrival to the district 6 months ago after my DM Colleen Serran was terminated my new DM called me to his office and asked where him and I stood? He wanted to know if I was going to be on his team. I answered honestly and said yes. He stated that day he would make time to talk once a week with me and discuss hot topics and training issues as a district team. That never happened.

Examples:
He brought in a new mgr to the district without even having me look at transcript.  I even learned from another source that we had a new manager in the district.
He currently has a shift B  running a store for months that he promised a promotion to store manager that still has not happened. He even went as far as on a conf call to introduce and congratulate her promotion to store manager. She is being held accountable for the job, she should have the title and be paid for it. When I asked what the hold up was as she is unable to hire or certify training, he just dismissed me. Again no discussion.

 

I opened the lines of communication as I was truly on his team and I did not receive that respect in return. If you were to read the job description for tsm, there is suppose to be collaboration with the DM.

My DM  just recently told managers that store meetings will have to be attended by the manager on their day off and that nco for new hires will also have to be paid back. As minimum operating stores, paying NCOs back will cause an employee to have to be alone in the building to pay back the 8 hours.

As he likes to constantly remind managers that they are salary, does he have the right to dictate what managers do on their day off? He attends region meetings and still takes his two days off. Will the company stand behind him for dictating their day off plans if  further action is taken? He also has told managers they have to work 6 days and even the shift times during the month of Dec. He has emailed out  a Oct., Nov. and Dec. work calendar that he states he has used for years. Is this a company program? Does this tie in with mySchedule? Again he is dictating what managers do on their day off. The district is being run on intimidation and fear and everyone is treated  guilty until proven innocent by the DM and RLPM.

 

Since my departing from the company, the RLPM is contacting managers, questioning and interrogating them about if they knew I was going to quit. The same interrogating that many of us had to endure in Feb when our ex DM left.  Our new DM  even brought up both our names on conf call last week and told people that if myself or our old boss text them to tell us to stop texting, to end communication.  They were basically being told to not communicate with me or her. These coworkers have become my friends and are like family for me.  They should not feel harassed or bullied to stay away from me. He even told them if anyone was quitting, to do so now. How do you think that made the team feel about how he thinks of them? How does that help with engagement? At this point since I have left the company, why is the field staff continuing to discuss my name?
My DM  sent out an email to the district the day I left stating “ Diana is no longer employed with CVS.” Giving the generic sentence used when someone is terminated and implying that I was terminated by the company. ( I have that email as well) My DM and LP Rep have made remarks about me at inventories and store visits in the past week and my friends have reported this information to me. I am putting the company on notice, any further defamation of my character by DM or RLPM will be addressed immediately with legal action.

 

Throughout the entire email I have not discussed payroll or workload as they are usually the big topics people like to bring up for leaving CVS. That is not my case. I was passed up numerous times due to no college degree, was overlooked as a TSM and valuable resource by current DM, and labeled as “one of Colleen’s people” by the hrbp and RM. I have always been a leader in this district and want to go out as a leader by passing this valuable information along to you so that the issues can be addressed.

 

I feel I had been harassed, discriminated against, and now defamation of my character can be added. CVS has always stated they are about the people and helping others on their path to better health. This is not the case in Area 8, Region 39. I can no longer work for leaders in this region that do not value their employees and talent they have. It is not usually about the money why most people leave CVS, or any other job for that matter, it is about not being appreciated by their supervisor.

I am sadden to have given up my career with this organization due to others lack of concern for their team and abilities.  But I am looking forward to what I know will be a promising new future.

 

*Since my departure of 10-5 three more store managers have given notice in this district….what is so sad is that a year ago 2014 District 39-01 ranked 9th best district in company and 4th in area. We had teamwork and engagement and respected our leader.

Several of my peers have complained about this DM and RLPM yet Nothing happens(falls on deaf ears)! Why are these people being protected?

Someone needs to ask the Five Why’s??

 
Sincerely,
Diana

 

Area 8
Region 39
District 1
Store 7536

I did email this letter to everyone from the area mgr all the way to the president of CVS and have had no response.

More judicial over reach by state Attorney General ?

 10/14/15 – Boston Doctor Files CFAA Lawsuit Against Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey

http://www.pharmacychoice.com/News/article.cfm?Article_ID=1454416

BROOKLINE, Mass., Oct. 13, 2015 /PRNewswire/ Bharani Padmanabhan MD PhD, a multiple sclerosis neurologist practicing in the Boston area who is called Dr. Bharani by patients and colleagues, filed a lawsuit in Federal court alleging massive violations of the Computer Fraud And Abuse Act (18 USC 1030) and the Stored Communications Act (18 USC 2701) by Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, certain members of her staff and two employees of the state Board of Registration in Medicine.

The complaint states AG Maura Healey sent two investigators to Dr. Bharani’s home to immediately confiscate the “complete page-by-page medical records (written and electronic)” of 16 patients under the pretext that Dr. Bharani had committed Medicaid Fraud. The complaint alleges AG Maura Healey, who calls herself the People’s Lawyer, violated the law on behalf of her client, James Paikos, whom she is representing in a private civil case. You can try these out for help from attorneys. The criminal defense lawyers from Mineola can provide legal aid that one requires as well.

Dr. Bharani refused to hand over his patients’ records and his patients approved of their doctor’s refusal to handover their personal medical records.

The complaint also states that Dr. Bharani has been seeing his patients for free for the past five years and the Government has not paid him one dime throughout that time.

Dr. Bharani said, “I had to file this lawsuit because the level of lawlessness within AG Maura Healey’s office should not be tolerated in a free country. Her actions have harmed me immensely. It is unheard of for an Attorney General, the highest elected law official, to suddenly send her people to a doctor’s home and scare his elderly parents, knowing he has not billed the Government or participated in Medicaid fraud.” One can go to https://scwestonlaw.com/dui/ to get the opinion of a lawyer. To visit this web-site for legal help would be the right thing to do.

Dr. Bharani’s complaint alleges violations of access to the confidential prescription data of all his patients, stored on protected government computers, and states “Defendants’ chilling violation and conscious disregard for the explicitly-protected data privacy rights of the people is likely to be routine and affects anyone who had a prescription filled in Massachusetts, including residents of other States.”

The complaint seeks injunctive relief including referring AG Healey for criminal prosecution defending against criminal charges, as well as punitive damages. It may be downloaded at www.maurabrokecfaa.com

Bharani Padmanabhan MD PhD
Brookline MA
(617)5666047 scleroplex@gmail.com

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/boston-doctor-files-cfaa-lawsuit-against-massachusetts-attorney-general-maura-healey-300159317.html

SOURCE Bharani Padmanabhan MD PhD