US PAIN FOUNDATION ASKS PATIENTS; “WHAT SHOULD WE BE WORKING ON?

US PAIN FOUNDATION ASKS PATIENTS; “WHAT SHOULD WE BE WORKING ON?”

The nation’s leading consumer pain organization is asking pain patients about the issues facing them.

“We are going to use the results to help develop our best course of action and to prioritize which states we are going to work to make change,” said Paul Gileno, Founder/President of the US Pain Foundation.

To take the survey, click here.

Gileno said the main purpose of the survey is to help people realize that there are issues that affect the quality of life of people with pain.

“We want people to be aware that their stories matter and finally we want people to realize that together we can make change in each state for better quality of care and access to needed treatments and medications,” Gileno told the National Pain Report.

The U.S. Pain Foundation understands the challenges and struggles those with pain endure. An organization created by people with pain for people with pain, we recognize and validate the 100 million Americans who courageously battle pain every day.

“The biggest challenge as always is going to be validating that pain is real and not having access to needed treatments, therapies and medications,” said Gileno.

On its website, the U.S. Pain Foundation supports the 4 Core Beliefs from the National Pain Strategy which will be released early in 2016.

  1. Chronic pain is a real and complex disease that may exist by itself or be linked with other medical conditions.
  2. Chronic pain is both an under-recognized and under-resourced public health crisis with devastating personal and economic impact.
  3. Effective chronic pain care requires access to a wide range of treatment options, including biomedical, behavioral health and complementary treatment.
  4. Denying appropriate care to people with chronic pain is unethical and can lead to unnecessary suffering, depression, disability and even suicide.

The US Pain Foundation is a partner with the National Pain Report. To learn more about the US Pain Foundation, visit their website.

Pain management: Patient needs must come first

Pain management: Patient needs must come first

http://drugtopics.modernmedicine.com/drug-topics/news/pain-management-patient-needs-must-come-first?page=0,0

In 2015, pain continues to be a conundrum for patients, practitioners, pharmacists, caregivers, long-term facilities, and payers. Balanced pain management is a comprehensive approach to diagnosing, treating, and controlling pain. It can include physical therapy and rehabilitation, psychological counseling, social support and/or medications, plus interventional procedures depending on an individual’s needs. Yet, many of our patients are not getting the care and relief they deserve, whether they suffer from acute or chronic pain. Unfortunately, we know from surveys that an estimated 40% to 70% of patients with chronic pain are not receiving proper medical treatment.1 Those with acute pain may face similar circumstances.

There are many complex reasons why patients are not getting adequate pain relief. Three important considerations are: reduced access to medications perceived to have a high cost; safety concerns, including the abuse, misuse, and diversion of opioids; and limited access to integrated pain management, such as physical medicine and rehabilitation, complementary care, and psychosocial counseling.

For the more than 100 million who suffer from chronic pain and untold millions with acute pain, access to appropriate, individualized pain management and clinical care is critical.2,3 Equally important is the safe use of medications when they are prescribed.

As the population, especially the aging population, continues to grow, so will the national pain crisis. New strategies are needed to help improve access, outcomes, and medication safety.

Pain and the role of multimodal analgesia

One step in the right direction is to ensure hospitalized patients with acute pain have their pain resolved effectively and efficiently. If not treated effectively, acute pain can become chronic, and chronic pain patients use a substantial portion of healthcare resources.4,5

Opioids are commonly prescribed for acute pain in the hospital setting. Although these drugs play an important role in the treatment of pain and are inexpensive in generic form, they can be associated with serious adverse events such as respiratory depression and bowel obstruction, as well as other complications such as sedation and dizziness leading to workplace accidents and falls. Ironically, hospitals may be over-relying on the use of opioids alone versus other pain management strategies, significantly increasing patients’ risk for adverse events and considerably driving up total costs with readmissions, longer stays, and additional care. According to data from a 2013 published study, total hospital costs for certain surgical procedures in which an opioid-related adverse drug event (ORADE) occurred were associated with a mean difference of $4707 more compared to surgical procedures without ORADEs. Length of stay associated with a surgical ORADE was 3.4 days longer than procedures without ORADEs.6

Multi-modal analgesia (MMA), the combination of two or more analgesics to attack pain from different pathways in the body, may offer patients effective pain management while minimizing opioid monotherapy. The Joint Commission recommends MMA as a strategy to help avoid accidental opioid overuse7 and numerous professional organizations such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists, American Society for Pain Management Nursing, the American Geriatrics Society and Society for Critical Care Medicine, consider MMA a best practice.

Despite medical community support for MMA, some formularies rely on generic opioids instead, because they are so inexpensive. To achieve the best outcomes for our patients, we need to pause, carefully assess individual patient needs, and prescribe the proper course of care at the appropriate time for each patient. We also must have the ability to prescribe what we think is the best approach for each patient.

Access to and safe use of opioids and alternative options

Opioids, when prescribed, have an important place in pain management, and ensuring their safe use is critical for individuals and society. But first, appropriate patients must have access, including those diagnosed with chronic pain. Patients also must have access to other management options, such as physical therapy and rehabilitation, psychological counseling, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and complementary approaches including acupuncture, therapeutic yoga, and biofeedback. It is critical that we discuss these options and ensure their availability to individuals in need.

Today, the pendulum seems to have swung too far on the side of caution in an attempt to reign in pain medication use. Although it is true in some cases that overreliance on opioids alone to manage pain has led to unanticipated, costly complications (including societal challenges related to misuse, abuse, and diversion), in other cases, those who truly need certain medicines or services find themselves with limited or no access because of stigma and safeguards aimed at unsavory “patients” (and unfortunately some clinicians). Sadly, for every doctor-shopping abuser, there are an untold number of patients suffering with debilitating pain caused by a serious disease or treatment consequence, traumatic injury, or major surgery. Take for example patients who experience HIV treatment-related neuropathy, postmastectomy-related pain, or chemotherapy-related neuropathy; many of these conditions require opioids or other medications.

For patients who are appropriately prescribed prescription pain medications, responsible use, storage, and disposal can help protect individuals, their families, and communities from harm.  This is where prescribers can play a vital role.

When prescribing certain pain medications, there must also be proactive discussion with patients that leads to a commitment to safely use, store and dispose of such medications, as part of the pain management plan. Prescribers also should be mindful to take appropriate steps to screen for potential abuse.  The Alliance for Balanced Pain Management offers tips for the safe use, storage and disposal of pain medication. 

Although pain relief is a national issue, we cannot forget the individual patient. As clinicians, our goal is not just to relieve pain, but to get patients functional and back to doing the things they normally do as safely and efficiently as possible. As such, we have a moral obligation that our patients have access to all available resources to alleviate their pain. 

Being on the “CVS TEAM” takes more than just a good education ?

triathalonArchitecture-Graphic-Standard

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CA Pharmacy Manager

http://m.jobs.cvshealth.com/california/pharmacist-retail-store/jobid9088293-ca-pharmacy-manager-jobs/description/true

Federal law requires employers to provide reasonable accommodation to qualified individuals with disabilities. If you require assistance to apply for this job, please contact us by clicking AA EEO CVS Health

Read the PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS for being a CVS PIC. Does it sound like there could be any “accommodations” for anyone ? As I remember the employment laws, a company can’t ask an certain questions about a applicant before they are offered/accepted a job. Of course, if a applicant voluntarily divulges some “private information” before the job is offered.. like you will need some accommodations.. it can be used against the applicant in the hiring process. Of course, by clicking on the click within the job ad.. that you have a disability… chances of being hired because of the required accommodations are probably between SLIM and NONE !

Being on the “CVS TEAM” seems to be similar to getting on just about any team that require a high degree of physical abilities.  Maybe the Pharmacy schools need to reevaluate their protocol of who they accept… to include certain physical attributes and/or capabilities.

Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Job Category: Pharmacist – Retail Store
Clinical Licensure Required : Pharmacist
Job Type: Full Time

Position Summary:

Health is everything. At CVS Health we are committed to increasing access, lowering costs and improving quality of care. Millions of times a day, we’re helping people on their path to better health—from advising on prescriptions to helping manage chronic and specialty conditions. Because we’re present in so many moments, big and small, we have an active, supportive role in shaping the future of health care. The Pharmacy Manager plays one of the most important roles at CVS Health as our pharmacy teams are at the forefront of this mission and are critical in both shaping healthcare and helping people on their path to better health.

The Pharmacy Manager leads and directs the Pharmacy Staff (comprised of both staff Pharmacists and pharmacy technicians) who help customers on their path to better health. The Pharmacy Manager is accountable for management, oversight and operation of all aspects of the pharmacy within his/her store including pharmacy professional practice, regulatory requirements, quality assurance, customer service, personnel management, inventory management, financial profitability and loss prevention. A key component of the Pharmacy Manager role is keeping customers and patients healthy through adoption and management of our patient care programs. Pharmacy Managers are also responsible for the development and performance management of all Pharmacy Staff, identification of critical business opportunities, establishing meaningful solutions to drive performance and growth and successfully implementing those plans by managing the Pharmacy Staff to accomplish these goals.

PHYSICAL ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF THE JOB
• Constant standing: remaining upright on the feet, particularly for sustained periods of time.
• Occasional walking: moving about on foot to accomplish tasks, particularly for moving from one work area to another
• Frequent handling, fingering and/or feeling: Picking, pinching, typing or otherwise working primarily with fingers rather than whole hand or arm.
• Occasional reaching: extending hand(s) and arm(s) in any direction
• Occasional stooping: bending body downward and forward by bending spine at the waist
• Occasional bending: stooping to a considerable degree and requiring full use of the lower extremities and back muscles
• Occasional talking: expressing or exchanging ideas by means of spoken word; those activities where detailed or important spoken instructions must be conveyed accurately
• Occasional hearing: perceiving the nature of sounds at normal speaking levels with or without correction, and having the ability to receive detailed information through oral communication
• Visual Acuity:
The worker is required to have close visual acuity to perform activities such as: transcribing, viewing a computer terminal, reading, visual inspection involving small parts.
• Occasional lifting of up to 30 lbs
• Light work: Exerting up to 30 lbs of force occasionally and/or up to 10 lbs of force frequently, and/or a negligible amount of force constantly to move objects

Required Qualifications:

• Active Pharmacy License in the state in which he/she is employed
• Not on the DEA Excluded Parties List
• Immunization Certification through an accredited organization (i.e. APhA)*
• Listed on the pharmacy state license as the ‘pharmacist in charge’
• Submission of required information/documents to your state PMP administrator to register for PMP access (in states with active PMP for pharmacist use).

Education:

Bachelor of Science in Pharmacy or Pharm. D. degree

Business Overview:

CVS Health, through our unmatched breadth of service offerings, is transforming the delivery of health care services in the U.S. We are an innovative, fast-growing company guided by values that focus on teamwork, integrity and respect for our colleagues and customers. What are we looking for in our colleagues? We seek fresh ideas, new perspectives, a diversity of experiences, and a dedication to service that will help us better meet the needs of the many people and businesses that rely on us each day. As the nation’s largest pharmacy health care provider, we offer a wide range of exciting and fulfilling career opportunities across our three business units – MinuteClinic, pharmacy benefit management (PBM) and retail pharmacy. Our energetic and service-oriented colleagues work hard every day to make a positive difference in the lives of our customers.

CVS Health is an equal opportunity employer. We do not discriminate in hiring or employment against any individual on the basis of race, color, gender, national origin, ancestry, religion, physical or mental disability, age, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, pregnancy, citizenship, or any other factor protected by anti-discrimination laws. Furthermore, we comply with the laws and regulations set forth in the following EEO is the Law Poster: EEO IS THE LAW EEO IS THE LAW POSTER GINA SUPPLEMENT

Federal law requires employers to provide reasonable accommodation to qualified individuals with disabilities. If you require assistance to apply for this job, please contact us by clicking AA EEO CVS Health

For inquiries related to the application process or technical issues please contact the Kenexa Helpdesk at 1-855-338-5609. For technical issues with the Virtual Job Tryout assessment, contact the Shaker Help Desk at 1-877-987-5352. Please note that we only accept resumes via our corporate website: http://www.cvshealth.com/careers

Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large group

congressstupidSenator proposing to charge drug companies for unused pills

http://wwlp.com/2015/12/03/senator-proposing-to-charge-drug-companies-for-unused-pills/

STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, DEC. 3, 2015…..The state would be able to bill pharmaceutical companies for unused drugs turned in by patients and put the proceeds toward addiction treatment and recovery programs, under a bill now before lawmakers.

The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Daniel Wolf, told the Joint Committee on Public Health Thursday that his legislation would require a new degree of responsibility and accountability from drug companies as the state grapples with rising rates of overdose and addiction.

“There’s no intent, from my perspective, that the pharmaceutical companies are intentionally creating addiction,” said Wolf, a Harwich Democrat. “I wouldn’t go that far. But I think one of the solutions we haven’t talked nearly enough about in this building is what role the pharmaceutical companies can play and should play in preventing and treating the problems that their drugs are really a very important part of creating.”

Wolf’s bill would expand upon existing drug take-back centers voluntarily set up in some communities, often at police stations, by calling upon the Department of Public Health to establish collection and disposal sites that could be easily accessed from all regions of the state.

The collection points would include technology to identify and catalog each pill before they were destroyed. That information could then be used to prepare an invoice that would be sent to the drug’s manufacturer. Money received through the buyback program would be deposited in a dedicated fund for substance abuse services.

“We know that we are falling way short in the ability to pay for these programs, and this would create a revenue stream,” Wolf said.

A substance-abuse prevention bill passed by the Senate in October (S 2020) contains a provision similar to Wolf’s program, calling for drug manufacturers to operate or participate in a collection and disposal program.

A national trade group representing pharmaceutical companies opposes Wolf’s bill, arguing that drug collection sites could potentially create new venues for drug misuse by establishing one public location where pills are aggregated and could be stolen.

“They would be known sites in the community where people could go to access drugs,” said Leslie Wood, deputy vice president of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. “We don’t believe it’s secure.”

Wood’s organization, known as PhRMA, does not object to drug disposal sites run by law enforcement agencies, she said.

In general, Wood said, PhRMA would prefer to see patients throw out unused medications with their regular trash, because they can get rid of them immediately instead of making a special trip or waiting for a dedicated take-back day.

“We don’t want patients to hold on to their unused medicines,” she said. “We want them to take them as they’re prescribed, secure them in your house, know what you have in your house, and when you don’t need them anymore dispose of them in your household trash.”

Of various proposals raised recently to combat opioid abuse, several have targeted the issue of unwanted medication that could be subject to misuse.

The Senate’s opioid bill also includes a measure allowing patients to request that a pharmacist only partially fill a prescription for certain drugs, while a bill filed by Gov. Charlie Baker would limit the supply of opioids doctors could initially prescribe a patient.

Elected officials have also voiced support for an initiative led by the Safe Homes Coalition, a California-based nonprofit, encouraging homeowners to safeguard and hide their prescription drugs before welcoming visitors for events like real estate open houses.

Exploring the impact of external expertise in pharmaceuticals, it’s evident that partnerships can greatly enhance efficiency. For more details, visit https://www.proteros.com/ to see how their services can integrate seamlessly into your development strategy, thus optimizing the pathway from laboratory research to market.

 

Copyright 2015 State House News Service

 

Once the bureaucrats start a “WITCH HUNT”.. only THEIR FACTS MATTER.. VICTORY AT ALL COSTS

witchhunt

Embattled Dr. Mark Ibsen closing Helena practice

http://helenair.com/news/local/article_fb7b25fc-5d59-57ca-bfa5-c855a60bce3a.html

Thursday may have been the last day of operation for Urgent Care Plus, which is owned by Helena Dr. Mark Ibsen. 

Ibsen said he’ll stay open as long as possible, but he can no longer sustain the business. Saying the clinic has been rendered worthless, Ibsen plans on giving it away to another proprietor, with whom he is in negotiations.

Last month, the Board of Medical Examiners met to discuss potential sanctions against Ibsen for not meeting standards of care in his recordkeeping. The board rejected an order that would have placed Ibsen’s medical license on probation, but two board members said they wanted to suspend his license while the case is resolved. 

“That was a very hostile meeting,” Ibsen said. “They pretty much promised to take my license.”

This case began in July 2013, when an investigation into allegations of over-prescribing painkillers began. The order followed four days of hearings last December spawned by allegations by a former employee of Ibsen. More than 20 witnesses testified. 

Ibsen says the more than two years of hearings followed by the arduous waiting for word from the Board of Medical Examiners regarding allegations of improper recordkeeping have rendered him emotionally and financially exhausted. His current practice cannot be revived, he said.

“That uncertainty has been rotting the core of my business for years,” Ibsen said. 

Because of bounced payroll checks and other issues, the clinic didn’t have enough staff Wednesday to open its doors. 

“This is a ghost town here,” Ibsen said, gazing around one of his patient rooms. 

A new clinic is expected to reopen in the space in January, he said.  

“Essentially, they’re just taking it over,” Ibsen said. “They’re going to try and make it work.” 

When at full staff, Urgent Care Plus had upwards of 18 employees, he said. The clinic ran at 39 Neill Ave. for about six years. Ibsen said he averaged about 11,000 patients annually. 

  As for Ibsen, he’s not sure what his next step will be.

“I’ve been anxious. I’ve been not able to make it through a whole day,” he said. “I have to get this stuff cleared up before I can go anywhere.”

At the request of the Board of Medical Examiners, attorneys for the state and Ibsen will continue to draft their recommendations for sanctions against Ibsen before a meeting in January. 

The board rejected a 50-page order written by a hearing officer for the Montana Department of Labor and Industry that called for Ibsen’s medical license to be placed on probation for 180 days. The order was submitted in June. 

Ibsen said he wishes the board members “would just come down here” to the clinic. 

“Well, it’s too late and we’re done,” Ibsen said.

 

5% decrease equals a prescription drug overdose death rate

Rx overdoses declining in Oklahoma

http://drugtopics.modernmedicine.com/drug-topics/news/rx-overdoses-declining-oklahoma

If prescribers are mandated to use the state’s PMP… which yielded a 5% reduction in drug overdoses… does this mean:

The prescribers are not requesting/using reports from the PMP

There is a lot of people who are using fake/false/forged ID’s and not showing up in the reports

A large number/all of these deaths… were NOT ACCIDENTAL… but SUICIDES

The number of Oklahoma residents who died last year from prescription drug overdoses dipped slightly, which some state officials believe is an indication that some of its drug-abuse prevention efforts may be succeeding.

Last year, 510 Oklahoma residents died from prescription drug overdoses, compared to the 538 prescription drug overdoses reported in 2013, according to the state health department officials.

The 5% decrease equals a prescription drug overdose death rate of 13.2 deaths per 100,000 people, which is the lowest rate in Oklahoma since 2007.

“There are more prescription drug overdose deaths each year in Oklahoma than overdose deaths from alcohol and all illegal drugs combined,” Gov. Mary Fallin said in a statement published in The Oklahoman.” Moving forward, we need to continue to push treatment and prevention programs wherever we can to help fight this dangerous public health problem.”

Oklahoma’s prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) tracks prescriptions filled for schedule II, III, IV, and V controlled substances. Beginning in November, state law will require that physicians check the PDMP when prescribing controlled substances.

Many states have created PDMPs, but often they are not combined with laws mandating prescribers use them. And some reports have indicated that physicians in many states do not regularly use them.

Oklahoma, like most states, has also seen an increase in the number of residents seeking treatment for substance abuse. According to state officials, 24% of Oklahoma residents seeking publicly funded substance abuse treatment were identified as opiate or heroin abuse cases. A decade ago, 10% of Oklahoma residents sought such substance abuse treatment for opiate or heroin abuse. 

Nearly 50 arrested in Oxycodone ring dubbed “Operation Checkered Flag”

Nearly 50 arrested in Oxycodone ring dubbed “Operation Checkered Flag”

STARKE, Fla. — Ten Florida state prison employees are among nearly 50 people facing charges in Bradford County in an illegal prescription drug ring dubbed “Operation Checkered Flag”. Arrests began at 4 a.m. Tuesday and many people have turned themselves in.

The people charged were involved in smuggling drugs, primarily Oxycodone, into Bradford County and state prisons in the area, according to Sheriff Gordon Smith.

Smith says former Department of Corrections employee Dillan Hilliard, arrested earlier this year, was the main dealer involved in bringing drugs to the community.

Hilliard and others allegedly brought in drugs from suppliers in Duval and Polk counties and sold them in Bradford County, including some to prison inmates. Hilliard allegedly had a runner who moved the drugs around the county.
Dylan Hillard

Dylan Hillard (Photo: Bradford County Sheriff’s Office)

“These are people that I know, I know their families… They are part of our community,” Smith said. “A lot of these people were friends. They grew up together all their lives.”

Oxycodone, methamphetamines and cell phones were allegedly smuggled into the prison by DOC employees, according to Bradford County Drug Task Force Sgt. Chris Bennett. Bennett says all of the Corrections employees involved in the ring have either resigned or been fired.

The investigation started with a tip in January 2015, but police had no idea how big this investigation would grow at the time. Forty-nine warrants were being served on Tuesday tied to the case. Besides the prison employees, several drug users in the community and a runner are facing charges. Multiple inmates are involved in the investigation but have not been charged yet, police say.

“This thing is not about the arrests, it’s about saving lives to me,” said Smith.

Smith says their next target will be doctors who are prescribing medications like Oxycodone when they should not be.

“Anybody that is over-prescribing or abusing our citizens is going to be investigated.”

The Department of Corrections issued the following statement about the arrests:

“All Florida Department of Corrections (FDC) staff arrested today have had their employment terminated. In the face of today’s arrests, it is important for the people of Florida to remember that the Department of Corrections employs more than 23,000 honest and hardworking people across our state. To ferret out the small minority of those who choose to engage in criminal activity, I have communicated a zero tolerance policy for misconduct, and instructed our Office of Inspector General (OIG) to take aggressive and direct action against those who engage in illegal activity. The Department’s OIG has worked collaboratively with the Bradford County Sheriff’s Office throughout this investigation and will continue to review the circumstances surrounding these incidents in two administrative investigations. Today’s actions send a clear message to both our officers and the people of Florida that any FDC employee engaging in criminal conduct will be identified and punished to the fullest extent of both Florida law and Department policy.”

Refusing a prescription and defaming the prescriber

Refusing a prescription and defaming the prescriber

http://www.pharmacist.com/refusing-prescription-and-defaming-prescriber

The better response may be to defer to company policy and simply say, “We can’t honor this prescription based on company policy.”  Does this suggest that the BOP’s -individually and collectively – are turning a “blind eye” to corporate policies that may be over-ruling the individual Pharmacist’s professional discretion , as provided under the practice act, and to fill/not fill a Rx. Does this suggest that the stacking of BOP’s with non-practicing corporate Pharmacists is causing the BOP’s to not focus on their primary charge to protect the public’s health and safety and allow corporate policies to the “prevailing decision maker”.

There are always trends in litigation against pharmacists. Most of these litigation trends reflect contemporary challenges in pharmacy practice, such as patient education or standards for sterile compounding. The most recent trend stems from the legal requirement that pharmacists refuse opioid medications when questions arise about the legitimacy of a prescription. 


Three legal cases reported in early October describe the alleged circumstances leading to defamation lawsuits filed by prescribers against a pharmacy. These three unrelated lawsuits from Indiana, Pennsylvania, and Virginia all alleged that pharmacists who refused prescriptions also made defamatory statements to patients about the prescriber. 


In each of the lawsuits, the pharmacy argued that the case should be dismissed based on a “qualified privilege” of the pharmacist to discuss drug therapy with a patient. In each lawsuit, the court refused to dismiss the case. This does not mean the pharmacies will ultimately lose. It does mean that criticizing a prescriber when refusing an opioid prescription may expose a pharmacist and/or pharmacy to liability for defamation.


Background


In the Virginia case, pharmacists who refused a physician’s opioid prescriptions allegedly made critical statements about the physician, such as “He is bad news,” “He writes too much pain pills and it’s against the law,” and “Your doctor won’t be in business much longer.”


In the Indiana case, the pharmacists refusing a physician’s opioid prescriptions allegedly said that the prescriber “operates a pill mill,” “is a murderer,” and “has been or soon will be arrested.”


In the Pennsylvania case, the pharmacists are alleged to have said that the prescriber “is an irresponsible doctor who just writes scripts and probably does very little treating,” “is being investigated by the DEA [U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration],” and that “nobody in the area fills his prescriptions.”


Rationale


In all three cases, the defendant pharmacies filed a motion to dismiss the cases based on the “pharmacist–patient qualified privilege.” A qualified privilege recognizes that pharmacists have a primary duty to patients and that this duty requires communicating essential information about drug therapy to patients. At times, essential information may reflect negatively on the prescriber. A qualified privilege negates the element of malice that is essential to a defamation lawsuit. To qualify for the privilege, statements made must be (1) in good faith, (2) intended to uphold a legitimate interest, (3) limited in scope and purpose, (4) made on a proper occasion, and (5) made in a proper manner to appropriate parties.


In all three cases, the courts ruled that the facts had not been sufficiently developed to determine whether dismissal was appropriate on the basis of the qualified privilege. All three cases will continue to be litigated.


Discussion


The refusal of an opioid prescription is, in itself, a significant statement about the prescriber and the concerns a pharmacist has about the prescription. Patients will often want to know why a prescription is refused, although they likely can infer the reason from the circumstances.


As the cases reviewed here suggest, it is potentially defamatory for pharmacists to make critical statements about prescribers when patients ask why an opioid prescription has been refused. Any temptation to criticize the prescriber should be resisted under these circumstances. The better response may be to defer to company policy and simply say, “We can’t honor this prescription based on company policy.” This incomplete explanation could be frustrating for both the patient and the pharmacist, but it is necessary given the possibility that patients will misconstrue even the most benign statements made about the prescriber. 



Based on: Mimms v CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 2015 U.S.Dist LEXIS (S.D.Ind. October 1, 2015), Goulmaine v CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 2015 U.S.Dist LEXIS 138359 (E.D.Vir. October 9, 2015), Yarus v Walgreen Co., 2015 U.S.Dist LEXIS 140562 (E.D.Pa. October 9, 2015).

 

pharmacists are more focused on filling a prescriptions ?

Feds step up drug enforcement of pharmacies

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2015/nov/25/policing-pharmacies-prescription-drugs/

On July 13, 2012, a pharmacy technician ordered 1,000 hydrocodone pills through the San Diego pharmacy he worked for.

But it was not a sanctioned order. The highly addictive drugs were either meant for his own consumption, or to restock the pharmacy’s supply of pills he had already stolen, concluded the state Board of Pharmacy, which ultimately revoked his license after he was convicted of prescription forgery and burglary.

The incident helped spark a massive investigation into Medical Center Pharmacy, a collection of a dozen family-owned pharmacies that operate throughout San Diego County. What the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration found was a system that lacked controls on the distribution of controlled substances, shoddy record-keeping and lax procedures on dispensing psuedophedrines, which can be used to make methamphetamine, the U.S. Attorney’s Office announced this month.

The investigation also found a total of 21,000 oxycodone and hydrocodone pills that were unaccounted for from four San Diego pharmacies over a two-year span. In some instances, the drugs are believed to have been delivered to a home used by pill seekers, authorities said.

The effort to combat the illegal flow of pharmaceuticals from legitimate businesses is intensifying as prescription drug abuse remains a top public health concern.

The DEA, which enforces pharmacy compliance with federal drug laws, has increased the amount of surprise inspections on businesses in recent years. And the state board that licenses pharmacists and similar workers is considering making it mandatory for pharmacies to inventory their drug supplies once every quarter to better stem the illicit flow.

Pharmacies are currently required to report when drugs go missing. Last year in California, 1 million dosages of pills were reported lost, said Virginia Herold, executive officer of the state board. The year before it was about 1.5 million.

“The problem is controlled substances are so valuable on the street compared to their value in the pharmacy,” Herold said. Some pills go for $30 each or more, she added.

Employees who divert pills are either addicted to the drugs themselves, or just selling them for the money, said DEA Supervisory Special Agent Thomas Lenox.

Besides pill diversion, other major problems that authorities look for is poor record keeping and pharmacists who are more focused on filling a prescription rather than doing their due diligence to make sure the prescription is legitimate and not stolen, forged or counterfeit.

“The one thing is, it’s all paper,” Lenox said of the stringent record keeping required of pharmacies. “You either have the documentation or not. If you don’t have them, you’re in violation.”

Investigators say the problems are seen just as much at large, chain pharmacies as at smaller mom-and-pop pharmacies. The only difference is volume: Missing pills are also sometimes spotted faster at the larger chains due to more stringent corporate policies in place, Herold said.

Earlier this year, CVS Pharmacies and the U.S. Attorney’s Office entered into a $22 million settlement after an investigation showed some pharmacies in Florida were knowingly filling illegitimate prescriptions for painkillers.

Authorities can go after offending pharmacies in various ways, from sending a letter of admonition to taking away the DEA registration that allows them to sell controlled substances to civil enforcement to criminal charges. The state board can also go after licenses of individual workers. Licensed workers do undergo background checks, Herold said.

In the Medical Center Pharmacy investigation, authorities went the civil enforcement route, resulting in a $750,000 settlement last week. The corporation, owned by Joseph and John Grasela, operates several storefronts under names such as Galloway Medical Center Pharmacy, Community Medical Center Pharmacy and Medical Center Pharmacy.

Besides the missing pills, authorities said the pharmacies also violated the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act, which requires pharmacies to keep a logbook of sales of certain over-the-counter medications that can be used to make meth. The records must include the buyer and the product purchased, and are intended to prevent individuals from buying large quantities of the same drug.

The pharmacies have had problems with the board before, Herold said. As part of the settlement, the owners have agreed to implement new inventory control measures, authorities said.

This case is just the most recent example of similar pharmacy misconduct in the county.

Last year, a Hillcrest pharmacist lost her Sixth Avenue Pharmacy over allegations of failing to account for 16,000 missing oxycodone pills, dispensing drugs with invalid or nonexistent prescriptions, exchanging drugs for services or advancing pills to customers, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

In 2008, federal agents raided three San Diego pharmacies on allegations that several employees were diverting painkillers.

The DEA works closely with the pharmacy board to educate pharmacies on drug trends, how to spot theft, and security measures such as surveillance cameras, keeping addictive drugs under lock and key and keeping stocks of such painkillers low.

kristina.davis@sduniontribune.com

(619) 293-1391

 

Iowa’s alcohol addiction problem is TWENTY FIVE TIMES worse than their Heroin problem..

w8RzbW7

Pain pill addicts fueling Iowa’s heroin epidemic

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2015/11/28/pain-pill-addicts-fueling-iowas-heroin-epidemic/75303620/

Iowa claims to have a Heroin epidemic .. yet… abt 50% of those dealing with substance abuse treatment were dealing with a ALCOHOLIC addiction.