FULL LAWSUIT – 50 pages – click image
Front Page of Lawsuit
Click on image to enlarge… may have to click twice
Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »
Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-walmart-verdict-idUSKCN0V633V
Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT.N) was ordered by a federal jury in New Hampshire to pay $31.22 million to a pharmacist who claimed she was fired because of her gender and in retaliation for complaining about safety conditions.
The Concord jury deliberated for 2-1/2 hours before ruling on Wednesday for the plaintiff, Maureen McPadden, after a five-day trial, her lawyers said.
McPadden claimed that Wal-Mart used her loss of a pharmacy key as a pretext for firing her in November 2012, when she was 47, after more than 13 years at the retailer.
McPadden also said her gender played a role, alleging that Wal-Mart later disciplined but stopped short of firing a male pharmacist in New Hampshire who also lost his pharmacy key.
According to the jury verdict form, most of the damages award stemmed from McPadden’s gender bias claims, including $15 million of punitive damages.
Bentonville, Arkansas-based Wal-Mart said it plans to ask trial Judge Steven McAuliffe to throw out the verdict or reduce the damages award.
“The facts do not support this decision,” spokesman Randy Hargrove said. “We do not tolerate discrimination of any type, and neither that nor any concerns that Ms. McPadden raised about her store’s pharmacy played a role in her dismissal.”
Lauren Irwin, a lawyer for McPadden, in a phone interview said the jury reached “a fair and just verdict.”
The case is McPadden v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP, U.S. District Court, District of New Hampshire, No. 14-00475.
Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »
One week before Christmas, police chiefs across the country received a letter from the Justice Department entitled “Deferral of Department of Justice Equitable Sharing Payments.”
It explained that drug forfeiture funds which local agencies received for working with Drug Enforcement Agency would be “deferred” until further notice. The DOJ referred to this as a $1.2 billion “rescission” needed to balance their budget.
Here’s why this should concern you. The Farmington Hills Police Department has a police officer assigned to a DEA Group in Detroit. We also have a sergeant and police officer assigned to the South Oakland Narcotics Interdiction Consortium. The Oakland County Sheriff, and our neighbors in West Bloomfield and Novi, and many of our neighboring communities also have personnel assigned to SONIC and the DEA in Detroit.
These personnel do more than just drug enforcement. Drug problems, especially high-level dealers, are a regional problem. We would not have the resources to deal with this on our own. Our officers are deputized as federal agents so they have police authority outside our jurisdiction.
The federal agents we work with have equipment and police authority we would not otherwise have. We have access to data and intelligence information necessary to take down drug cartels. Local police agencies sharing resources with drug task forces means better results and reduced crime.
We frequently receive assistance from the Task Force investigating drug dealers in our community. The DEA has provided resources to us that have helped solve major cases, including the arrest of a homicide suspect in 2014. Our officers gain invaluable training and experience that they bring back to our department.
If this “money grab” is not reversed, the effectiveness of drug investigations would diminish drastically in the Detroit area, where local police officers make up 47 percent of the total Detroit DEA task force staffing. Local communities like ours will not be able to afford to dedicate full-time resources to these Federal Task Forces.
Drugs would flourish without the ability to seize drug dealer assets, including their money and property which is re-invested in the war against drugs.
The return of forfeiture funds to local communities through the Equitable Sharing Program is only fair since considerable local tax dollars fund the salaries of local officers participating in federal task forces.
In our community these funds have been used to purchase things like Argos, our drug sniffing dog, bringing educational programs like Drugs 101 to parents, equipment like bullet-proof vests and even specially equipped police vehicles. Our community has received hundreds of thousands of dollars of drug forfeiture funds in the last few years alone.
This does more than just offset the costs associated with devoting staff to Federal task forces. It helps make our community a safe place to live. It reduces drug crimes, and all of the associated crimes that accompany drug use.
Sadly, this change may be just politics. The administration has made the claim that our country incarcerates too many people for drug offenses, and they want to change that. Eliminating the funding for almost half of DEA Task Force staffing will certainly result in fewer arrests.
However, it will not in any way reduce the drug problem, only our ability to enforce the existing laws and make arrests. This will be a great relief for the drugs dealers, but not for our residents. We will likely see increases in other crime categories such as larceny from automobiles, petty theft, breaking and entering, home invasions, etc. These are all crimes frequently linked to drug use. Even the U.S. Attorney in Detroit is unhappy about this recent Justice Department money grab.
If you feel so inclined, please take a moment to write to your legislators, who have the ability to influence this poorly thought out decision. Let them know that the equitable sharing of Drug Forfeiture Funds must be restored to insure that local municipalities can continue to participate in Federal Task Forces. Write to:
Write to U.S. Sen. Gary Peters, www.peters.senate.gov; U.S. Rep. David Trott, www.trott.house.gov; U.S. Rep. Brenda Lawrence, www.lawrence.house.gov; and the U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC, 20530-0001.
Our goal is to reduce actual crime and remain a safe city, not to improve crime statistics by limiting funding and enforcement capabilities.
Richard Lerner is a Farmington Hills City Councilmember.
Filed under: General Problems | 1 Comment »

https://vtdigger.org/2016/01/27/burlington-police-commissioner-disturbed-by-masks-on-officers/
BURLINGTON — Police Commissioner Jerry O’Neil, a former federal prosecutor and longtime observer of law enforcement in the city, has recently noticed a trend he finds disturbing.
Police have started to wear balaclavas — masks that cover their faces — something he hasn’t seen in 40 years watching policing in Burlington, O’Neil said.
“The balaclavas have just come into Burlington. I’ve never seen them before here, and I find it incredibly disturbing, because I think they’re very upsetting to citizens,” O’Neil said during a Police Commission meeting Tuesday night.
Police Chief Brandon del Pozo said he opposes the wearing of balaclavas on principle but that they serve a legitimate purpose in a narrow range of circumstances. Currently, the only Burlington officers allowed to wear the masks are the six members of the narcotics unit and only when they’re making a drug arrest, he said. They must also be in uniform if they’re wearing a balaclava, del Pozo said.
Narcotics officers work with confidential informants and do plainclothes patrols, so when they’re in uniform and tactical gear making an arrest they don’t want people to see their faces. That’s because neighbors or others involved directly or indirectly in the drug trade may recognize them in the future, del Pozo said.
O’Neil responded that those same officers don’t wear balaclavas when they testify to put drug dealers behind bars. He also questioned why the department doesn’t send officers who aren’t part of the narcotics unit to make arrests.
Del Pozo said it’s a resource issue. Sending other officers to make drug arrests would mean pulling them away from their regular duties.
“I don’t like balaclavas. I’m alarmed by the way it looks. I think it sends the wrong message,” del Pozo said. But he argued that has to be balanced against the need of narcotics officers to be unrecognized.
The masks smack of police militarization, del Pozo said, a trend he believes is detrimental to building trust with residents. That’s why Burlington recently stopped participating in the U.S. Department of Defense military surplus program.
O’Neil said he still didn’t understand why the use of balaclavas appears to have increased recently. He suggested it might have to do with Drug Enforcement Administration agents’ “propensity” to conduct operations masked. He said the recent DEA-led raid where the target was shot and killed highlighted the issue for him.
There could be an element of what O’Neil described as “me-tooism,” where local police officers are emulating a practice of federal agents that is perceived to be cool.
“That has crossed my mind,” del Pozo acknowledged. As a department, Burlington police need to examine whether that’s the case.
Del Pozo said that when he arrived at the deadly DEA raid he saw more officers in one place wearing balaclavas than he’d ever seen in any one place, including his time in the Army.
Most were federal agents, but members of the Burlington narcotics unit were wearing them as well, del Pozo said. The first thing del Pozo said he did upon assuming command was order the masked officers off the street so they wouldn’t “terrorize citizens.”
“I can’t order the DEA to unmask, and there may be reasons not to, but I said, ‘At least just get them out of the public eye. It’s very alarming,’” he said.
Filed under: General Problems | Leave a Comment »
http://www.bellinghamherald.com/news/article56893938.html
For several years, all Indiana Pharmacies have been using this national database for PSE sales called NPLEx http://www.appriss.com/nplex.html not sure how much tax money Indiana had to spend to fund this system’s operation. IMO.. the system had to major flaws, first of all a driver license is required and there is no way to validate the driver’s license against something like the BMV’s online database and once a driver’s license number and information is entered into the system.. the next time that the (unverified) driver’s license is presented and the number is entered into the NPLEx website… the rest of the screen’s data points SELF POPULATE and confirmation bias kicks in for the pharmacy staff. As long as that particular driver’s license had not tried to purchase more PSE than required by law.. the PSE is sold to the person presenting the driver’s license. The fact that Indiana is one of the states with the most meth lab busts… so it would appear that the NPLEx system is a absolute failure without the ability to validate driver’s licenses… BUT does the politicians do the obvious thing and give pharmacies the ability to validate licenses so as to make NPLEx workable.. NOPE !!!!
INDIANAPOLIS
Pharmacists are one step closer to gaining the authority to require a prescription for certain cold medicines as the Indiana House explores proposals to undermine methamphetamine cooks.
With no opposition, the measure passed the House Public Health Committee on Wednesday.
The bill is a stripped-down version of a prescription-only mandate for pseudoephedrine, a key ingredient for meth production.
Republican Rep. Ben Smaltz of Auburn originally wanted that mandate for all sales of pseudoephedrine, but decided to scale the measure back after skepticism from House Public Health Committee chairwoman Cindy Kirchhofer and other House members.
“We have done almost everything we can to stop meth labs in Indiana, short of making pseudoephedrine a prescription drug,” Smaltz said in a statement. “After working closely with pharmacists and physicians, I believe we have crafted a bill that would take a significant step toward curbing meth production in our state, while also considering the convenience of law-abiding Hoosiers.”
Oregon and Mississippi are the only two states to require a prescription for all pseudoephedrine sales, although many other states have attempted to pass similar legislation.
Indiana has led the nation in meth lab seizures for the last three years.
The prescription requirement has been considered several times in Indiana to combat the trend but foundered amid fierce debate between pharmaceutical companies and law enforcement organizations.
Under this year’s revised proposal, people who have rapport with pharmacies will be able to buy as much pseudoephedrine medicine as federal law permit. For those with whom the pharmacy is not familiar, pharmacists may recommend tamper-resistant products or a limited amount of pseudoephedrine. If a customer refuses both of those options, the pharmacists can request a proof of prescription.
Smaltz said the state Board of Pharmacy will set guidelines for how pharmacists will make determinations and have the authority to punish pharmacists who violate the guidelines. The board was unavailable for comment Wednesday.
Rep. Steve Davisson of Salem said empowering the pharmacists to decide makes sense. He is a licensed pharmacist and voted for the measure.
“That’s what pharmacists do,” he said. “They consult. And as you ask those questions, you get a feel for the type of people.”
The committee also passed a bill to ban drug offenders from buying pseudoephedrine without a prescription.
Filed under: General Problems | 11 Comments »
The decision to centralize federal decision-making on drug abuse as well as other major problems in rural areas — rising suicide rates, declining physical and mental health, and increased financial stress — comes as addiction to heroin and other opiates has become a crisis in many areas.
In an interview Thursday, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough said the work Vilsack has done since 2011 chairing the White House Rural Council, a group focused on these areas, has given him “firsthand experience” seeing how substance abuse and poverty have continued to keep Americans in some parts of the country from making headway.
“The whole point is to have the secretary of agriculture look across the [federal government] to see what unique capabilities agencies have to invest in blowing through these obstacles to opportunity in rural communities.”
The Rural Council encompasses 15 departments and multiple agencies, including Health and Human Services, Veterans Affairs and the Office of National Drug Policy, among others.
And as opioid addiction has emerged as a more pressing political issue — with presidential candidates from both parties addressing the concerns of voters in Iowa and New Hampshire, the two states that will cast votes on the parties’ 2016 nominees next month — both GOP and Democratic lawmakers have shown a willingness to expand federal support for tackling it.
The budget agreement struck last month provided the administration with more than $400 million to address the epidemic, an increase of more than $100 million from the previous year. It also cut language barring the use of federal funds for needle-exchange programs, a move that many public health advocates had sought.
Vilsack will unveil the new initiative during a town hall discussion on Friday at Ohio State Universirty in Columbus, where he will be discussing the expansion of the administration’s rural-development efforts in 11 counties experiencing persistent poverty in the part of Appalachia that extends into southern Ohio.
In an interview Thursday, Vilsack said that while any long-term solution to the problem will have to be pursued by the next president, the current administration could help develop a comprehensive strategy and elevate the issue in the American consciousness. Obama held a forum on the subject in October in Charleston, W.Va., a state where more than one-third of the overall injury deaths stem from drug overdoses.
“For me, as presidential candidates talk about this, the importance to me is to bring this issue out of the shadows,” Vilsack said, noting that the “rugged” image of independence often prized in rural America “really makes it hard for people to seek help.”
Matt Chase, executive director of the National Association of Counties, said in an interview that the new initiative is “very timely and much-needed federal attention.” He described the increase in drug and alcohol abuse in rural areas as “symptoms” of an economy where there is more automation and a lower need for workers.
“To me, it really boils down to the lack of economic opportunity in so many of these areas,” he said, adding that although the administration has looked at the issue in the past, Vilsack’s appointment shows “more presidential focus.”
In many cases, state and local groups are banding together to try to combat rising overdoses. The National Association of Counties and several other state and local government groups announced Thursday that they have successfully negotiated with drug companies to purchase Narcan nasal spray, which can counteract the effects of an overdose, at a 40 percent discount.
Mark Publicker, past president of the Northern New England Society of Addiction Medicine, said that while he was “utterly pessimistic” that a government task force could have a major impact on the problem, he had been encouraged by some of the efforts the administration had been taking to address the fact that the rural poor are “most stricken by the epidemic and have the least access to treatment.”
“There’s value in identifying the fact that we’re dealing with a multidimensional, complex problem that deserves more than the simple answers that are being floated,” said Publicker, who treats addiction patients in rural Maine.
Filed under: General Problems | 4 Comments »
Prescriptions for hydrocodone combination products (HCPs) fell significantly after the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) tightened restrictions on those drugs, according to a study published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine.
For years the US has been in the grips of a prescription drug abuse epidemic, in part driven by the availability of hydrocodone and other opioids such as oxycodone, codeine and methadone. In 2013, more than 200 million prescriptions for opioids were filled in the US, 136 million of which were for hydrocodone.
The opioid epidemic is also seeing increased attention in Congress. Last week, Sen. Edward Mackey (D-MA) placed a hold on the vote to nominate Robert Califf as US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner, and today, six senators wrote to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) urging the agency to release its long-delayed opioid prescribing guidelines.
When the Controlled Substances Act was enacted in 1971, drugs containing hydrocodone as the only active ingredient were listed on Schedule II, signifying a high potential for abuse, while HCPs were placed on the less restrictive Schedule III. Notably, prescriptions for Schedule II drugs cannot by refilled, unlike those for Schedule III drugs, which can be refilled for up to six months.
DEA first requested the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provide it with a recommendation for rescheduling HCPs in 2004. In its response in 2008, HHS responded that HCPs should remain Schedule III drugs.
Under the 2012 Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was instructed to hold a public meeting to gather input to inform its recommendation to DEA on scheduling HCPs.
In 2013, FDA convened its Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee (DSaRM) to discuss whether HCPs should be rescheduled. After two days of deliberation, the panel recommended HCPs be rescheduled in a 19-10 vote.
Then, on October 6 2014, following a notice of proposed rulemaking, which drew 573 comments, DEA rescheduled HCPs from Schedule III to Schedule II.
To determine the effect rescheduling had on the number of prescriptions for HCPs, officials from HHS and FDA compared the number of prescriptions filled in the 36 months prior to the rescheduling to the 12 months after.
Prescriptions for liquid and tablet forms of HCPs declined 8.4% and 6.0%, respectively, over the 36 months prior to rescheduling.
However, after moving to Schedule II, prescriptions for liquid and tablet forms of HCPs dropped by 22% and 16%, respectively. According to the authors, 73.7% was due to the elimination of refills on these drugs.
The researchers also saw a slight increase in other opioid combination products corresponding with DEA’s action, though this was not enough to “substantially offset” the drop in HCP prescriptions.
Filed under: General Problems | 2 Comments »
Advocacy Alert – Just a quick note to remind you of the opportunity to listen to the CDC Public Hearing tomorrow, January 28th. The committee will meet from 9:00am-3:00pm EST with Public Comment from 1:00pm-2:30pm EST. The Board of Scientific Counselors will discuss the draft recommendations in the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain (Guideline), as well as observations formulated in the Opioid Guideline Workgroup Report. We encourage all who are available to listen in and stay informed. Here is how: Audio Conference toll-free dial-in Number: 1-888-469-1243, Participant Code: 4709506
Filed under: General Problems | 3 Comments »
http://sfglobe.com/2016/01/21/mR3/?src=home_feed
A young Minnesota mother is looking for a new pharmacy after her local CVS botched prescriptions for her kids on two separate occasions, says Fox9.
The first time it happened, Vanessa Gilbertson barely caught the mistake. She had just picked up a prescription for her seven-year-old daughter when she noticed a manufacturer’s label on the bottle that read, “Amoxicillin”. The CVS label which had been placed over it called the drug Ibuprofen. Gilbertson realized she had been given the wrong medicine.
Filed under: General Problems | 6 Comments »
http://www.pennlive.com/news/2016/01/overdoses_opioids.html#comments

The Pennsylvania region that includes Harrisburg, York and Lancaster experienced a 442 percent increase in hospitalizations for painkillers from 2010 to 2014, according to a new analysis.
That was the largest increase out of nine regions, and more than double the average statewide increase of 204 percent.
The southcentral region also experienced a 305 percent increase in heroin overdose hospitalizations. That was above the statewide average of 145 percent, but below the level of increase in the northwestern and northcentral regions, which saw increases of 426 percent and 509 percent.
The analysis was done by the Pennsylvania Health Cost Containment Council in an effort to shed further light on the crisis of painkiller and heroin overdoses. The epidemic is attributed to easy access to prescription painkiller and a historical cheap supply of heroin. Both drugs are opioids, which are highly addictive and cause addicts to feel severely without an opioid. The majority of heroin addicts first become addicted to a painkiller.
Pa. painkiller-heroin crisis: 10 important things to know
A new report estimates 34,000 people aged 12 to 17 try heroin annually in Pennsylvania, and that 80 percent of people who use heroin first abused prescription painkillers.
In the midstate, in another public event devoted to the crisis will take place Feb. 8 at 6:30 p.m. in the auditorium of Northern High School near Dillsburg. The session will include a presentation by a heroin task force established by York County.
In terms of sheer numbers of overdoses, the Philadelphia region led the state, with 16.5 heroin overdoses per 100,000 people, and 12.3 painkiller overdoses per 100,000 people, according to the PHC4 analysis.
The southcentral region, made up of counties including Dauphin, Cumberland, Perry, York and Lancaster, had 8 painkiller overdoses per 100,000 people, and 5.4 heroin overdoses.
That statewide average as 8.8 painkiller overdoses per 100,000 people, and 8.7 heroin overdoses.
The analysis found that in 2014, 7.5 percent of hospitalized heroin overdose victims died, as did 1.5 percent of painkiller overdose victims.
The report looked only at painkiller and heroin overdose victims who were hospitalized — not those brought to the emergency room who don’t end up hospitalized.
Joe Martin, the executive direct of the PHC4, said the agency lacks access to the hospital ER data.
Martin said he suspects there would be “many more” case if those who are treated and released from the hospital were counted.
According to the analysis, about 44 percent of the people hospitalized for painkiller overdoses were 40 or older. With heroin, the age skews younger, with 43 percent being younger than 40, and 22 percent being in their 20s.
Filed under: General Problems | 3 Comments »