Still no admission to the relationship of suicides using opiates ?

Exploring The Link Between Chronic Pain And Suicide

http://commonhealth.wbur.org/2015/11/chronic-pain-suicide

This week’s grim report about rising suicide and overall death rates among white, middle-aged Americans contains a slim silver lining. Here it is:

The new analysis by two Princeton economists, Anne Case and Angus Deaton, suggests that chronic pain — and the opioids used to treat it — may be a key driver of the rising deaths. While the “noisy” opioid epidemic has garnered near-daily headlines across the country for several years now, the equally horrible but silent epidemic of chronic pain has not yet broken through into the nation’s consciousness. Maybe things are beginning to change.

Many people still don’t realize it, but 100 million American adults live with chronic pain, many of them with pain so bad it wrecks their work, their families, their mental health and their lives.

There are no hard data on how many people with chronic pain die by suicide every year. But there are inferences. The suicide rate among people with chronic pain is known to be roughly twice that for people without chronic pain.

(jennifer durban/Flickr)

(jennifer durban/Flickr)

Since there are 41,149 suicides every year in the U.S., according to the National Center for Health Statistics,  it’s possible that roughly half of these suicides are driven by pain. Not proven fact, but plausible hypothesis. This would suggest that perhaps up to 20,000 Americans a year with chronic pain kill themselves, which would be more than the government’s tally of 16,235 deaths from prescription opioids every year.  According to a CDC spokeswoman:

In 2013, there were 8,257 deaths that involved heroin and 16,235 deaths that involved prescription opioids. These categories are not mutually exclusive: if a decedent had both a prescription opioid as well as heroin listed on their death certificate, their death is counted in both the heroin as well as the prescription opioid death categories.

The truth, of course, is devilishly difficult to figure out with any certainty. Many people in severe, chronic pain have, and should have, opioids available. But unless they leave a suicide note it’s virtually impossible to tell if they overdose on purpose or accidentally. That’s in stark contrast to a pain patient who ends his or her life using a gun. That’s clearly a suicide, with or without a note.

In the course of researching my 2014 book on chronic pain, I heard many grisly stories. One Salt Lake City truck driver I interviewed would be dead today if his wife hadn’t walked in on him with a gun in his mouth. He had been in severe headache pain and after many visits to the ER, was repeatedly dismissed as a drug seeker, even without a medical workup. (Eventually, he was diagnosed with two brain aneurysms, bulging weak spots in a blood vessel).

I also heard about a surgeon with shingles who could find no relief for his pain and took a scalpel to his back in an attempt to dig out the painful nerves; he wound up in his own ER — as a patient. I heard of another man with ophthalmic shingles who finally shot himself because of unrelieved pain. A Boston surgeon I met was on the verge of suicide due to unrelenting pain from a rare autoimmune disease.

The anecdotes go on and on. Unfortunately, from a statistical point of view, they are just anecdotes. And unlike opioid abuse deaths, the stories of these and other pain patients rarely make the headlines.

Nor do these cases routinely make it into the reports of medical examiners and coroners, according to Utah pain specialist Dr. Lynn Webster, writing in a recent issue of Pain Medicine News.

In this week’s Princeton study, the lead author, Anne Case, was particularly interested in the role poor health might play in suicide because, as she told The New York Times, she herself has suffered for 12 years from disabling and untreatable lower back pain. In her research, Case discovered that middle-aged people, unlike the young and unlike the elderly, were reporting more pain in recent years than in the past. One-third of people in this group had chronic joint pain in recent years and one in seven reported sciatica.

The dismal situation with chronic pain — and the potential link with suicide — is unlikely to improve until the federal government takes the pain epidemic seriously. While the government spends $2,562 on research for every person with HIV/AIDS, it spends only $4 for every person with pain.

Clearly, chronic pain needs more attention and more research dollars. After all, it is the main reason Americans go on disability.

And it appears to be driving growing numbers of Americans to kill themselves.

Judy Foreman is the author of “A Nation in Pain: Healing Our Biggest Health Problem.”

Could this affect chronic pain treatment by insurance companies ?

NY AG sues insurer over hepatitis C treatment

https://www.pharmacist.com/ny-ag-sues-insurer-over-hepatitis-c-treatment

Why doesn’t the NY Attorney General care about insurance company’s denial of care of chronic pain pts ?

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has accused insurer Capital District Physicians’ Health Plan (CDPHP) of delaying coverage for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments until patients showed advanced symptoms of the disease.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has accused insurer Capital District Physicians’ Health Plan (CDPHP) of delaying coverage for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments until patients showed advanced symptoms of the disease. A lawsuit filed Thursday in state Supreme Court in New York County claims that CDPHP did not cover medically necessary care and misled members about their coverage. “Forcing patients to wait for care, risking internal organ damage, is unconscionable and, as we allege in our lawsuit, violates the law and the company’s own policies,” Schneiderman said. A spokesperson for the Albany-based insurer said the company’s HCV coverage is “comparable” to that offered by other health insurers, and its coverage guidelines are similar to the state’s own Medicaid program.

what do these have in common ?

swatisismarchingunclesambadschoolyardbully

All of these people/groups/entities target various groups/individuals to dominate over, control/manipulate or harm/torture/kill. Some use a more direct method.. like a school yard bully that causes harm normally to one person at a time.

Some – like terrorists – behead groups or causes whole groups to become refugees

Some, use “no-knock warrants” and ends up “executing” innocent citizens that try to defend their home

Some, use/abuse the legal authority that the citizens have given them to control/restrict access to some basic human rights — like appropriate medical care.

Bottom line.. in reality… there is not much difference between these entities… just the methodologies which they use to cause harm to others ?

Imagine this: buying drugs ILLEGALLY and not getting what you thought you were getting ?

robotwarningFentanyl disguised as other drugs alarms authorities

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2016/apr/16/fentanyl-smuggling-attempt-raises-concerns/

U.S. customs officers at the Otay Mesa border crossing found the tablets hidden in the man’s underwear.

There were more than 1,000 pills labeled as oxycodone, but a Drug Enforcement Administration lab later discovered that the tablets contained a far stronger opiate — fentanyl.

The Feb. 10 confiscation is believed to be the first time federal officials along the California-Mexico border intercepted fentanyl tablets disguised as oxycodone, raising concerns among authorities that such cover-ups could lead to fatal consequences.

“Unsuspecting individuals who illegally purchase oxycodone could potentially die from the ingestion of what turns out to be fentanyl tablets,” U.S. Attorney Laura Duffy said in a statement this past week. “We are very concerned that these counterfeit pills could cause serious harm to users.”

 

In the Sacramento area there have been more than 40 overdoses believed to be tied to fentanyl since late March — 10 of them fatal. Some of the individuals thought they were taking Norco, a less potent painkiller, authorities said.

The DEA issued a public safety alert April 1 warning that fentanyl-related overdoses are “occurring at an alarming rate” and urged people to only take pills prescribed by a physician or obtained from a reputable pharmacy.

In San Diego County, fatal overdoses linked to fentanyl rose from 16 in 2014 to 28 last year, according to data from the Medical Examiner’s Office. There have been two deaths tied to fentanyl this year, but investigators have not yet determined what led to many other overdoses, a spokeswoman for the medical examiner said.

Health officials say overdosing on fentanyl, which is 25 to 50 times stronger than heroin, lowers blood pressure, diminishes breathing and slows the heart rate. A form of fentanyl is typically used in a clinical setting for extreme pain management or as an anesthetic during surgery. It can be prescribed in patch or lollipop form.

Because fentanyl is cheap to manufacture illicitly, disguising it as other drugs is more profitable for dealers. Mexican drug cartels are known to purchase fentanyl from China and produce the opiate from precursors sourced from abroad.

“These criminals are putting fentanyl into fake pills and passing them off as legitimate prescription medications,” said William Sherman, special agent in charge of the DEA in San Diego. “This just goes to show the lengths to which criminals will go to make an easy buck.”

In 2014, the DEA noted the sudden appearance of fentanyl in San Diego-area smuggling busts. In October of that year, Border Patrol agents near Murrieta seized 32 pounds of fentanyl, valued at more than $600,000, authorities said. A few weeks later, 14 people were indicted in a cross-country drug trafficking ring that smuggled drugs including fentanyl from Mexico through San Diego.

Alarmed by the recent overdoses and deaths linked to the drug, Sen. Patricia Bates, R-Laguna Niguel, introduced a state bill earlier this month to increase prison time for those who sell or distribute large amounts of the powerful painkiller.

Among those backing the measure is San Diego County Sheriff Bill Gore, who said in a letter of support that Senate Bill 1232 “validates the serious nature of fentanyl.”

The American Civil Liberties Union, however, argues it would only aggravate jail crowding.

The suspected drug smuggler in the February incident, Sergio Mendoza Bohon, 19, of Tijuana, was arraigned in federal court in San Diego Thursday. Besides the tablets, he was also found with 5.4 grams of powdered fentanyl, prosecutors said.

david.hernandez@sduniontribune.com

Coroner: don’t need toxicology report to determine “accidental death” ?

Lafayette shooting suspect found dead Sunday

http://www.jconline.com/story/news/crime/2016/04/14/shooting-suspect-found-dead-sunday/83042156/

Jordan S. Thomas died 11 days after bonding out of jail on charges that he shot and wounded Michael Hickman II on Dec. 20, 2015.

Thomas, 25, of Lafayette, died Sunday, Tippecanoe County Coroner Donna Avolt said Thursday. The coroners’ office is awaiting results from toxicology tests, which take four to six weeks, she said.

“More than likely, (the cause of death) will be accidental,” Avolt said.

Police arrested Thomas the night of the shooting in the 1900 block of Schuyler Avenue. Nine days later, prosecutors charged Thomas with aggravated battery, battery with a deadly weapon and battery resulting in serious bodily injury. On Feb. 12, prosecutors added a charge of unlawful use of firearm against Thomas.

At the time of the shooting, Thomas accused Hickman of selling him and his girlfriend bad drugs that made them sick, according to a probable cause affidavit. Thomas asked Hickman to come to his apartment on Schuyler Avenue to discuss the bad drugs. Thomas then told police he shot Hickman when Hickman went for his gun, according to the affidavit.

Online court records indicate that Thomas posted bond on those charged on March 31.

Purdue University is accused of firing an award-winning, longtime employee after she became a paraplegic.

Lawsuit: Purdue discriminated against disabled employee

http://www.jconline.com/story/news/2016/04/08/lawsuit-purdue-discriminated-against-disabled-employee/82661446/

Purdue University is accused of firing an award-winning, longtime employee after she became a paraplegic.

Rebecca Haynes-Bordas said she had been a valuable employee at Purdue University, winning awards for her work as an educator and financial counselor. She also received good performance reviews and was, at one point, recommended for a promotion.

But in 2014 — a year after she became a paraplegic — the 68-year-old Indianapolis resident was fired from the job she held for 25 years.

In a federal lawsuit she filed last month against her former employer, Haynes-Bordas accused the university of firing her for reasons that had nothing to do with her skills and performance. She claims Purdue discriminated against her because of her disability, failed to make reasonable accommodations for her disability, revealed her confidential medical information to co-workers and retaliated against her after she asked for minor structural changes in her work building.

“I couldn’t believe it. I just thought this can’t be true. I really felt like somebody had kicked me in the gut,” Haynes-Bordas said about her termination. “When I bring it all back up, it’s just unconscionable. It’s just not realistic. It hurts.”

Brian Zink, a spokesman for Purdue, said the university had received the complaint and will not comment on pending litigation.

Haynes-Bordas had been an educator at Purdue’s extension office in Indianapolis since 1990. She trained families from low- and moderate-income households on how to manage their money and work within their budgets. Part of her job was to connect the research university’s resources to the community.

In late 2012 and early 2013, Haynes-Bordas underwent two major surgeries, one to replace a leaking aortic valve and a second one to repair a triple abdominal aneurysm that was at risk of bursting. Complications from her second surgery, which lasted more than 11 hours, resulted in injuries to her spinal cord. She became paralyzed from the waist down and now uses a wheelchair to get around.

She was required to undergo lengthy rehabilitation and physical therapy. According to the complaint, Purdue’s disability benefits coordinator told Haynes-Bordas that she was eligible for long-term disability leave from May 2013 to May 2015.

While going through months of physical therapy, Haynes-Bordas trained and received a license to drive a modified van. She also regularly contacted her boss, the extension office’s district director, to update him on her progress, the complaint states.

In early 2014, Haynes-Bordas informed her boss that there might be additional issues for her to get inside the office building once she returned to work. The toilet would have to be modified to make it more accessible, but the building manager told Haynes-Bordas the minor structural change wouldn’t be a problem, the complaint states.

She said her boss did not respond to her requests for modification, which, she added, would not have cost the university any money at all.

“I repeatedly asked my district director to come and see me, to visit me and see the update to my condition, my recovery,” Haynes-Bordas said. “I live 10 minutes from the office. He never ever did.”

In May 2014, after receiving approval from her physical therapist and with still a year left in her long-term disability leave, Haynes-Bordas told her boss that she should be ready to return to work in about a month.

Two weeks later, her boss called her, Haynes-Bordas said.

“You have been off so long, the community needs aren’t being met. Unless we have a firm date in the near future, we will need to terminate your position in order to advertise and refill it,” Haynes-Bordas’ boss told her on the phone, according to court records.

She said her boss did not explain what he meant by “near future.”

The following day, she received her termination letter from Purdue. The letter stated Haynes-Bordas had exhausted both her paid and unpaid leave. The lawsuit claims this wasn’t true because her long-term disability leave did not expire for another year.

Purdue began looking for a replacement the following month, the complaint states. Haynes-Bordas then filed a discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The lawsuit, filed on March 16 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, says Purdue’s actions violated the Americans with Disabilities Act.

“When it became obvious that she’d need some accommodations at work, once she presented her changed circumstances, she was no longer treated as the long-term valuable employee that she’d been for 25 years,” said Indianapolis lawyer Michael Dalrymple, who represents Haynes-Bordas. “All of a sudden, she’s a problem.”

Annie Watts, who has known Haynes-Bordas personally and professionally for 50 years, said her friend has earned an excellent reputation among her colleagues and the community she serves.

Haynes-Bordas was among a group of educators who received an award for creating a program that teaches students how to manage their finances. She also was often quoted and featured in articles and news releases about Purdue’s money-management programs.

Shortly after she went on medical leave in late 2012, Haynes-Bordas was recommended for a position as an interim county extension director. Another staff member was selected because Haynes-Bordas’ pending medical procedures required her to take time off work.

Dalrymple said Haynes-Bordas’ case illustrates why the federal disabilities act became law.

“First, it allows someone who experiences such a traumatic and life-changing event to rehabilitate themselves and return to the work they love and perform at such a high level,” Dalrymple said. “Secondly, it protects her from unconscionable conduct of her employer and provides an avenue for redress.”

Call IndyStar reporter Kristine Guerra at (317) 444-6209. Follow her on Twitter: @kristine_guerra.

NY Supreme Court: Pharmacist doesn’t have duty to warn in overdose death !

Does this mean that “corresponding responsibility” has NO LEGAL STANDING ?

In this case, the CVS defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the
complaint insofar as asserted against them. The CVS defendants established their prima facie
entitlement to judgment as amatter of lawthrough the submission of expert evidence demonstrating
that theydid not undertake to render any professional judgment in filling the decedent’s prescription,

that the prescription was filled precisely as directed by the prescribing physician, and that the
prescription was not “so clearly contraindicated” that ordinary prudence required the pharmacist to
take additional measures before dispensing the medication (see generally Doria v Benisch, 130
AD3d 777, 778; Smolian v Port Authority ofN.Y.&N.J., 128AD3d 796, 801;Montagnino v Inamed
Corp., 120 AD3d 1317, 1318; Kelley v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. Ctr., 100 AD3d 600, 600). In this
regard, the CVS defendants demonstrated that the dosage that was prescribed was appropriate for
the decedent, that the prescription did not exceed that drugmanufacturer’smaximum recommended
dosage, and that, given the information available to the CVS defendants, the generally accepted
standards in the community did not require the pharmacist to take any additional measures before
filling the prescription (accord N.X. v CabriniMed. Ctr., 97 NY2d at 255; Toth v Community Hosp.
at Glen Cove, 22 NY2d at 265 n 3). Furthermore, contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, it was
entirely appropriate for the CVS defendants to rely upon the expert opinions of individuals who are
defendants in the case (see e.g.Hayden vGordon, 91AD3d 819, 821;Graziano vCooling, 79AD3d
803, 804; Belak-Redl v Bollengier, 74 AD3d 1110, 1111).

www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/…/D45647.pdf

Live Interview with Dr. Mark Ibsen, MD

LiveSupportGroup.comA NON- PROFIT ORGANIZATION

Live Interview with Dr. Mark Ibsen, MD

 

Live Support Group is proud to announce a live interview with Dr. Mark Ibsen on Wednesday April 20th at 9:00 PM EST.  Many of us have heard of Dr. Ibsen and his story of treating his pain patients. Dr. Ibsen will be telling his story up close and personal of how he felt he complied with the Hippocratic Oath and what that cost him both personally and professionally.  

This special event will also provide many of you the opportunity to ask Dr. Ibsen questions regarding his experiences with the new rules and guidelines concerning the use of opiates, his predictions for the future and what we can do to prevent this from happening further.  Please don’t miss this chance to hear from the other side of the exam table!  

 

ALL THE BEST ALWAYS,
YOUR FRIENDS FROM LIVESUPPORTGROUP.COM

http://us10.campaign-archive2.com/?u=dffdd733890eff7031edcd49f&id=c13018005e&e=f44783ad23

what are they thinking ??? OR are they really thinking ?

emptyheadProsecutors, experts debate controversial drug-induced homicide charge

http://thesouthern.com/news/local/prosecutors-experts-debate-controversial-drug-induced-homicide-charge/article_236dcd04-77d1-5ccf-b7cf-4cbcdde82e95.html

Attorneys are suppose to be smart/bright well educated people.  They are known for their ability to do through research on various subject matters…When it comes to the mental health condition of addictive personality disorder… they seems to be “brain-dead”.

Overdosing on opioids, a classification that includes heroin and prescription painkillers, is a leading cause of unintentional death for Americans, and Southern Illinois has been hit hard.

Area prosecutors say they hope that drug-induced homicide and similar charges under different names, all of which can carry stiff penalties, send a message that dealing heroin won’t be tolerated in their communities.

But in an era giving rise to a gentler war on drugs – through greater use of alternative sentencing that includes treatment, and Good Samaritan laws providing legal immunity in many situations for those who seek help for someone who has overdosed – the increase in drug-induced homicide charges seems to swing the pendulum in the other direction.

At the least, it’s a complex charge, used with increased frequency, that raises several questions. Among them: Who is at fault when someone chooses — out of addiction, curiosity, a desire to fit in, or any number of other reasons – to take an illegal substance and then dies? What justice is served by locking up the last person in the supply chain who provided the drug, which is often a friend or acquaintance who is an addict, and using with the one who dies, when larger dealers up the supply chain go unscathed?

And what of the fact that many people overdose on legally obtained prescription opioids, such as OxyContin and Vicodin, and many others who fatally overdose on heroin first become opioid dependent from substances prescribed by a doctor following a surgery, injury or accident.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, opioids – heroin and prescription painkillers, obtained legally and illegally – killed more than 28,000 people in 2014, more than any other year on record. At least half of all opioid overdose deaths involve a prescription opioid.

‘Shades of gray’

In regards to the decision to charge someone with distribution resulting in death, Jim Porter, the acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Illinois, said prosecutorial discretion is important because there are “all kinds of shades of gray” in fatal overdose incidents.

“The fact that heroin was redistributed is something we take into account,” Porter said. “Another thing we look at, and it’s sort of a sliding scale, we look at the person’s culpability.”

In the case involving Keith Scott Brown, 27, of West Frankfort, who was recently sentenced to 23 years in federal prison, Porter said the fact that he left someone behind who was dying, or already dead, without calling 9-1-1 was a major contributing factor in his office’s decision to seek an indictment related to the death of Steven Keith Scott, also 27, of Benton. 

He also said availability of the charge can be a deterrent, though his office does not utilize it frequently.

He estimated the southern district, in the past four years, has sought convictions for distribution resulting in death about six times in the East St. Louis venue. Porter was not aware if there had been a case in the Benton venue prior to Brown’s conviction.

That case started under the direction of his predecessor, Stephen Wigginton, who has since returned to private practice.

Still, Porter said the heroin and pain pill abuse epidemic is not something the country can prosecute its way out of. He noted his support for President Barack Obama’s recent proposals to increase both treatment options and access to them.

“We need other programs. We’re for that,” he said. “In the end, there are certain people who have to be prosecuted because of the nature of the cases.”

Owens: It’s a deterrent 

Franklin County State’s Attorney Evan Owens, who originally filed charges at the county level in Brown’s case, said he felt very confident that the outcome of this case was a good one for the citizens he serves. It amounts to one less person who will be distributing heroin in the community, he said.

“In this case, we’re comfortable to believe that we had a person that needed to be prosecuted,” Owens said. The case was transferred to the federal level, he said, because the federal sentencing guidelines allowed for a stricter punishment. A drug-induced homicide conviction in Illinois is punishable by six to 30 years, he said, while a federal distribution leading to death charge is punishable by 20 years to life.

 
 

Owens said he hopes this sends a message to others who distribute drugs, and noted that distribution doesn’t have to mean that money has changed hands, and can apply to a person who supplies it to a party, even if they do so free of charge to those participating.

Owens said that he believes that the vast majority of crime in Franklin County is attributable to illegal drugs, not only use and distribution, but the associated crimes, which can include robbery, theft, battery, domestic abuse, child abuse and others.

“We strongly want to get dangerous drugs out of the county, and if they’re dealing and supplying, there are going to be consequences,” he said.

Owens said his county has a drug court, and he thinks alternative sentencing that includes treatment is appropriate for some offenders. But while Owens said there are no absolutes, he believes charges are appropriate to the person who supplied the drug in most cases where there is an overdose death resulting from illegal substances.

“When we find a death and we find that someone died as a result of illegal drugs, we’re looking to make a case for the person who provided it to them,” he said.

Owens said he is proud of the fact that Franklin County, per capita, was recently listed as one of the leading counties in Illinois in terms of the number of drug-induced homicide charges successfully convicted. Not all were related to heroin, he said, and he was not immediately able to provide details and statistics.

Expert: Strategy ineffective 

Kathie Kane-Willis, director of Roosevelt University’s Illinois Consortium on Drug Policy, countered that this is not a statistic worthy of boasting.

Just the opposite, she said, sending troubled addicts to prison for decades costs taxpayers handily. Brown’s federal prison stay is likely to cost taxpayers close to $1 million by the time he’s released, based on average yearly costs, she said.

“There’s no evidence to suggest that prosecuting people in this way will get rid of a health problem,” she said. “It’s a health problem and we need to bring health solutions to it and they just need to be implemented.”

When drug-induced homicide was first placed on the books in 1989 in Illinois, she said, it was intended to be used to go after people who intentionally caused harm, but in more recent years, as heroin use exploded again, has been rewritten to allow for more flexibility.

It also was meant to provide another tool to crack down on large-scale dealers when overdose deaths occur, but those people are rarely caught, she said, because it’s so difficult to prove the line of distribution further up the chain. She didn’t speak to Brown’s distribution charge, but specifically opposes charges of drug-induced homicide as it’s commonly being applied.

Other communities, which perhaps saw the heroin epidemic surge earlier than in Southern Illinois, have developed programs and policies to respond to what should be viewed as a health problem, she said. That includes education about Good Samaritan laws, easier access to the drug naloxone, which can reverse the effects of opioids, greater use of alternative sentencing through drug courts, and an increase in programs to treat people who are addicted.

Some of those programs are in place in Southern Illinois, but many report gaps in the system.

Kane-Willis said that the roughly $1 million it will cost taxpayers to incarcerate Brown could be better served creating more programs to encourage addicts into treatment, and opening up access in an area where the substance abuse network reports being overwhelmed with the growing heroin problem.

She questioned whether there were any substantive efforts made to get Brown treatment assistance in the past, such as when he served time previously in state prison. Brown served time after he was convicted in June 2011 of burglary, when he was 22.

In October 2010, he was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, and placed on probation. His record also includes various misdemeanor convictions.

molly.parker@theouthern.com

618-351-5079

On Twitter: @MollyParkerSI

Is this another “feel good” piece of legislation ?

Congress passes Ensuring Patient Access Act

http://www.drugstorenews.com/article/congress-passes-ensuring-patient-access-act

ARLINGTON, Va. – The U.S. House of Representatives on Tuesday passed the Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2016 (S. 483) in the same version passed by the Senate, making President Obama’s consideration and signature the final step before enactment.
 
The legislation, advocated by both retail pharmacy and the pharma industry, would advance collaboration among health and enforcement authorities to achieve drug abuse solutions that maintain patients’ legitimate access to medications.
 
The Senate passed S. 483 on March 17, 2016. The House previously passed a slightly different version one year ago – in April 2015.
 
“This legislation is consistent with NACDS’ position that the complexity of these issues demands a 100% commitment to patient care and a zero tolerance for abuse,” stated Steven Anderson, president and CEO of the National Association of Chain Drug Stores. 
 
“More than three years ago, HDMA’s pharmaceutical distributor members created the initial concept that later became the bill that was passed today,” added John Gray, president and CEO for the Healthcare Distribution Management Association. “It has been gratifying to watch as the primary framework, initially advocated by our industry, and supported by patient, pharmacy and provider groups, gained champions in the House and Senate and evolved into full-fledged legislation that ultimately garnered bipartisan support.”   
 
NACDS has noted that the steady progress of the legislation in the Congress can be considered to be highly consistent with public attitudes. In an opinion study commissioned by NACDS last summer, likely voters who are engaged and aware when it comes to current events indicated through their responses an appreciation for the need to address drug abuse and drug access in a complementary manner.
 
Nearly 8-in-10 respondents agreed with the statement: “Pharmacies have a dual role when it comes to battling prescription drug abuse: They have to be part of the solution by working with law enforcement officials to stop prescription drug abuse, but they also have to maintain their responsibilities to patients by making sure they receive the medications they legitimately need.”