America’s Other Epidemic: Chronic Untreated Pain

America's Other Epidemic: Chronic Untreated Pain

America’s Other Epidemic: Chronic Untreated Pain

http://townhall.com/columnists/debrajsaunders/2016/05/15/americas-other-epidemic-chronic-untreated-pain-n2162807

The death of Prince, who apparently had a Percocet problem, and a 2016 presidential primary peppered with New England town halls that delved into increased heroin overdoses and prescription drug abuse have converged to create what CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta calls “a public health epidemic.” Drug addiction is 2016’s big nonpolitical story. CNN aired a special, “Prescription Addiction: Dead in the USA.” The Senate passed the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act to provide grants for treatment and improved monitoring. The House also is working on legislation, with funding expected later in the year.

Grant Smith, deputy director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance, sees Washington moving in the right direction by “treating drugs as a health issue” and “addressing head on some of the harms associated with opioid use.” Some 78 Americans die from opioid overdoses every day, CNN reports. Its special “Prescription Addiction” related some horror stories — the football star who was popping 1,400 opioid pills a month; the teen who suffered irreversible brain damage after he started experimenting with friends; the teen who died of an accidental overdose after he got hooked on drugs prescribed to treat a football injury. Gupta cautioned that there is “legitimate pain that warrants” a prescription, but for a short period of time. Given the rise in overdose deaths, the media should warn the public about the risk that comes with painkillers.

I see a downside to coverage that has turned painkiller addiction into a media chew toy. This narrative focuses on doctors who for a variety of reasons seem to have overprescribed medication, and on patients who at their own peril try to game the system to get drugs to feed their addiction. There is little room in this narrative for the many individuals who do not get the pain control they need. I am talking about older people who need better end-of-life care. Many start phobic about painkillers, as they fear being drugged and listless. They may not realize that good palliative care can make them more able to cope in their remaining time. (As for those few who might overuse medication, who cares? They’re not going to take up robbing banks.)

I called Eric Chevlen — a friend, Ohio pain medicine specialist and medical oncologist — to get his take on the new big story. Chevlen sees another problem in America — untreated pain. Poor people and uninsured individuals are less likely to get the relief they need. Also, people who have hard-to-diagnose ailments (like fibromyalgia, which mostly afflicts women) may go years before receiving available treatment.

Because they’re debilitated, people who don’t get the pain control they need may not feel like speaking up, so you don’t hear their stories. You hear of addicts who go to the emergency room in search of a fix, but not about those who suffer in silence.

When it comes to pain control, Chevlen told me, “hardly anybody gets the right amount.”

Chevlen has two concerns about the new approach in Washington. First, new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines are labeled guidelines, “but they’re going to be interpreted as mandates.” Second, Chevlen also believes that pushing patients away from opioids and toward anti-inflammatory meds carries a different risk — toxicity. Some patients will die from long-term organ damage, a side effect of pharmaceuticals, but their deaths won’t be counted as overdoses.

I know that this column will spur readers to write about the horrible tragedy of a child, or other loved one, who got sucked into opioid addiction and into a downward spiral that ended in death. Too many families can point to a doctor who didn’t keep a careful eye on what he prescribed. Or maybe the doctor was careful, but opioids had taken an ineffable hold and street trade made other drugs too available. Their stories are powerful, and serve as a warning. But there are other stories too — tales of people racked with pain that robs them of the joy of living. As Chevlen warned, “When we’re treating pain inadequately, fewer people die of opioid deaths.”

 

Narcotics Overdose? Or Biased Reporting?

Narcotics Overdose? Or Biased Reporting?

acsh.org/news/2016/05/16/narcotics-overdose-or-biased-reporting/

It is hardly news that there is a catastrophic opioid addiction crisis in this country. In the last fifteen years, the rate of death from prescription drug abuse and overdose has tripled. Who is to blame? There is no simple answer.

This is a very complex issue involving multiple factors. Some that are commonly heard are: changes in medical philosophy regarding pain, careless doctors, drug companies, the 1996 launching of OxyContin, the addictive potential of the drugs, cost, changing preferences of drug users, the lack of effective non-narcotic alternatives for pain management … others.

So, it is a mistake to point to one factor, as does The Charlotte Observer. The paper not only oversimplified the issue, but added its own agenda — blaming doctors, something that is evident from the headline of its article of May 14:

overdose

Approximately 100 percent of readers who see this headline will automatically think, “the pills killed Riley Martin, and his doctors are to blame.” Unless you bother to read the article. Then the story changes a bit:

“An autopsy revealed Martin had overdosed from a toxic mix of cocaine and prescription medications, including the types of opioids obtained from his doctors.”

Not only is the headline misleading, but it could also be wrong. Did Riley take all of the pills? How much cocaine did he take? What were the other medicines he was taking? How much, if any, did they contribute?

At first glance, the number of pills seems to be quite high. But the maximum dose of Vicodin or Percocet is 12-five milligram pills per day. Over nine days, that adds up to 108 pills — not much different than the maximum recommended dose over that time period.

How much did the other legal medications contribute?

Martin was also being treated for severe anxiety:

“[During a previous] visit, [Martin’s physician] increased Martin’s dosages for both Zoloft and Klonopin after Martin complained that he still suffered anxiety.”

Was this death a result of laziness or indifference by Martin’s doctors?

“Records show that [one of Martin’s physicians] discussed pain management options and instead of prescribing Percocet as Martin requested, [he] called a prescription for 25 Vicodin to [his] pharmacy.” (1)

Was this death, even as tragic as it was, due to malpractice or criminal negligence by Martin’s doctors?

“[T]he North Carolina Medical Board and the Board found that the of care by [the physician assistant who also cared for Martin] was appropriate and fully complied with the applicable law and regulations.”

Also, “Martin was not honest about his drug use. Martin listed his only medication as a nasal decongestant.”

I am not at all saying that Riley Martin’s tragic death was his own fault, or that he in any way deserved this awful fate. That would be entirely unfair. Just like the headline.

Unlike the misleading headline, this incident is very far from simple. No one knows exactly why Riley Martin died.

The Charlotte Observer doesn’t either. It shouldn’t pretend otherwise. The paper should also hold off on assigning blame. It is possible that the only “blame” in Riley Martin’s death lies with some very imperfect drugs.

Politician tells all in manifesto

‘We’re running a f—ing casino’: Politician tells all in manifesto

‘We’re running a f—ing casino’: Politician tells all in manifesto

http://nypost.com/2016/05/13/were-running-a-f-ing-casino-politician-tells-all-in-manifesto/

An anonymous congressman has dropped a bombshell election-year book that confirms why Americans hate their national government and have rallied to anti-establishment presidential candidates like Donald Trump.

The veteran politician lays bare a rotten and corrupt Congress enslaved by lobbyists and interested only in re-election in an anonymous, 65-page manifesto called “The Confessions of Congressman X.”

“Like most of my colleagues, I promise my constituents a lot of stuff I can never deliver,” he admits. “But what the hell? It makes them happy hearing it . . . My main job is to keep my job.”

The House member — a Democrat who is either still in Congress or served sometime over the past two decades — says more time is spent fundraising than reading bills and calls Washington a “sinkhole of leeches.”

The title of one chapter sums up his view of congressional leaders: “Harry Reid’s a Pompous Ass,” he says of the Senate Democratic leader.

The book, published by the small Mill City Press, is based on years of transcribed private discussions, which the congressman last November gave editor Robert Atkinson.

Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidPhoto: Getty Images

Atkinson declined to say whether Congressman X is a current or former House member.

X says the cloak of anonymity gave him the freedom to expose ­secrets, including how the public’s money is wasted.

“We spend money we don’t have and blithely mortgage the future with a wink and a nod. Screw the next generation. It’s about getting credit now, lookin’ good for the upcoming election,” he says.

He said he and his colleagues often lie to try to be all things to all people instead of tackling the nation’s problems.

“I contradict myself all the time, but few people notice,” X says. “One minute I rail against excessive spending and ballooning debt. The next minute I’m demanding more spending on education, health care, unemployment benefits, conservation projects, yadda, yadda, yadda.”

Voters are described as gullible, know-nothing jerks, while the only people who count are the big donors who pour billions of dollars into lobbying.

“Voters are incredibly ignorant. It’s far easier than you think to manipulate a nation of naive, self-absorbed sheep who crave instant gratification . . .,” vents Congressman X.

He says money “corrupts” and House members are “puppets” to lobbyists who bankroll their campaigns.

‘America’s on an irreversible decline and no one in Washington seems to care . . . God help us.’

 – Congressman X

“Business organizations and unions fork over more than $3 billion a year to those who lobby the federal government. Does that tell you something? We’re operating a f–king casino,” he says.

He describes himself as a “closet moderate” who supports charter schools and tax vouchers to allow poor kids to go to private schools.

But students take a back seat to partisan politics..

“Our education’s in the toilet, and all we do is snipe at each other,” he says.

Congress is too polarized and partisan to get anything done, by the congressman’s account.

“There seems to be a complete disintegration of confidence in government. A fear that government is its own special interest,” he says.

“America’s on an irreversible decline and no one in Washington seems to care . . . God help us.”

The controversial book set off a guessing game in the political world about the author’s identity.

New York sources speculated it’s Rep. Steve Israel (D-LI), a moderate who announced he’s retiring and who has complained about the constant need to fundraise to finance re-election campaigns.

But Israel, a novelist, denied that he took pen to paper this time.

“Absolutely not true, never heard of it before. And frankly, now that I’m leaving Congress, if I were to write a book like that, I would put my name on it,” ­Israel said in a statement.

cryingeyevote

 

DEA subpoena pre-empts HIPAA and all other regulations ?

Euless pain management doctor must turn over patient info to DEA, federal appeals court rules

Is this another incident where the “judicial system” condones/protects the (illegal ?) actions of the DEA which is another part of the judicial system (DOJ). To help perpetuate the DEA’s existence , the war on drugs and the 51 billion dollar budget ?

http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2016/05/euless-physician-must-turn-over-patient-files-to-dea-federal-appeals-court-rules.html/

A Euless doctor will have to turn over some of his patient information to the DEA as part of a criminal investigation into his prescribing of pain pills and tranquilizers, a federal appeals court has ruled.

Dr. Joseph Zadeh, 51, had questioned the DEA’s use of an administrative subpoena for medical files at his office instead of a court-ordered warrant, saying among other things that it violated his patients’ privacy.

Joseph Zadeh

Joseph Zadeh

But the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on April 21 that the federal district court was correct in confirming that the subpoena was valid. The appeals court said the federal Controlled Substances Act “pre-empts” the Texas Occupations Code.

The DEA initially requested patient files. But under a previous agreement, Zadeh must provide the names, dates of birth and addresses of the more than five dozen patients connected to the subpoena, court records show. He also must turn over lab work as well as diagnosis and prescription information, records show.

The ruling is expected to have a major effect on how the government investigates health care fraud. It means that agents can get patient information from doctors without criminal warrants, which have to be signed by a judge based on probable cause.

The DEA is investigating the “diversion of controlled substances” in connection with Zadeh’s practice, according to federal court records.

The subpoena did not seek information about all of Zadeh’s patients, just those whose prescriptions had “already come to the attention of the DEA through its other investigative efforts,” the appeals court said.

Zadeh referred questions to his attorney, who declined to comment on Monday.

Zadeh also claimed abuse of process in court documents in how the subpoena was handled.

Investigators with the Texas Medical Board visited Zaheh’s office with DEA agents in October 2013 to serve the administrative subpoena. While the state investigators identified themselves, the DEA agents did not, court records show.

The agents interviewed neighboring businesses and looked at Zadeh’s prescriptions at a local pharmacy while state investigators scanned and copied documents, court records show.

Zadeh’s attorney arrived and asked the investigators to end the search. The DEA agents left. About a month later, the DEA issued a second subpoena to Zadeh, seeking the medical records of 67 people who received prescriptions.

Zadeh refused to provide the records, arguing their release would violate the Fourth Amendment and state law.

“Dr. Zadeh has put forth no evidence that the DEA agents who joined the Medical Board investigators meant to mislead Dr. Zadeh’s employees by remaining silent during this time,” the appeals court ruled.

Zadeh started his practice in Euless in 2009, according to his Linkedin page.

The Texas Medical Board initiated a formal complaint against him in March 2015, state records show. The state’s allegations include that Zadeh:

–Routinely prescribed Xanax and Hydrocodone to patients without stating a reason, showing a pattern of “non-therapeutic” prescribing.

–Failed to monitor his patients for abuse or diversion of the drugs he prescribed and failed to order drug screens despite evidence of abuse and diversion.

–Failed to maintain adequate medical records for his patients.

–Operated an unregistered pain management clinic.

 

CNN show on Rx Addiction.. a bait and switch ?

What Anderson Cooper’s Show About Prescription Addiction Got Wrong About Chronic Pain

http://themighty.com/2016/05/response-to-anderson-coopers-prescription-addiction-show/

Paul Gileno is the founder and president of the U.S. Pain Foundation.

The “Anderson Cooper 360” town hall “Prescription Addiction: Made in America,” which aired May 11 on CNN, further stigmatized people with pain. I am deeply troubled and disappointed by the one-sided, biased discussion surrounding pain medication that completely disregarded the voices of people living with debilitating pain.

U.S. Pain Foundation was asked to participate. As an organization, we were hopeful this would be the start of a positive, constructive conversation bringing better resources, understanding and help to those dealing with addiction and those courageous individuals battling unrelenting chronic pain. Sadly, the outcome was not what we had hoped. Instead, the show was another slight to the pain community. It now seems U.S. Pain was invited not because they valued our opinion and wanted to bring the true story to the forefront, but rather because they wanted to show that all sides of problem were included in the “discussion.”

The apparent goal of the program was to further stigmatize people with pain by pushing an agenda — an agenda that harms those suffering with pain. The town hall meeting showed that CNN and Anderson Cooper do not think people with pain matter. The hour-long “conversation” appeared to be scripted, was extremely discriminant to the pain population and was potentially hazardous. It is a travesty that millions of Americans are treated as second-hand citizens in the opinions and views of mainstream media, government officials and society.

Mr. Cooper, a true journalist attempts to give the full picture and tries to show the whole story. They do not push an agenda or ignore an entire population of people suffering from pain. Sadly, Kay Sanford was the only person with pain given the opportunity to speak. Appallingly, both Anderson Cooper and Dr. Drew Pinsky interrupted her as she shared her experiences and tried to ask a question. They were dismissive of her pain journey. In a mind-blowing moment, those on the panel even had the audacity to say her story was the minority. This shows me CNN had an agenda, which did not include highlighting the courage or struggles of people with pain.

U.S. Pain maintains that addiction is a serious epidemic in America that also faces societal stigmatization. However, the foundation believes the pandemic of pain in America is just as important. Those with pain have to prove their pain daily, and mainstream news outlets that preach a “balanced approach to reporting” are in fact making the situation more difficult for us to have voice and stake in the solution. They are impeding our ability to have access to the pain care we need and deserve. When will people with pain matter enough? What must happen for our voices to be heard?

As founder of U.S. Pain Foundation, I am asking for your help today — right now, in this moment. I encourage all of you to contact those CNN producers who led us to believe we would have a voice at the table. Together, let’s encourage them to do a show on pain and the realities of pain. I encourage you to speak out against these so-called journalists and reputable leaders in the field of medicine (such as Anderson Cooper, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Dr. Leana Wen and Dr. Drew Pinsky) who are harming people with pain by not sharing the whole story. Speak your mind and share your feelings on social media.

There is strength in numbers. Let’s start a public outcry for a new show about the plight of people with pain. Talk about the challenges you face accessing adequate pain care, and the difficulties you have overcome to find a new normal. This isn’t only about pain medication; this is about making sure millions of Americans are not further degraded or discredited. It is about advocating for better solutions that are covered by our health care and accessible to all.

Take this opportunity to empower and educate those who should have done better research. Let them know this type of program causes more scrutiny as well as heartache and pain for people who are already judged, marginalized and stigmatized. I am asking everyone to speak loud and speak often. People with pain matter. I repeat: People with pain matter.

The Mighty is asking the following: What’s one commonly held opinion within the community surrounding your disability and/or disease (or a loved one’s) that doesn’t resonate with you? If you’d like to participate, please send a blog post to community@themighty.com. Please include a photo for the piece, a photo of yourself and 1-2 sentence bio. Check out our Submit a Story page for more about our submission guidelines.

what you are up against !

1-img20160516_0114Click on graphic to enlarge

All of the entities are using your tax dollars to create, interpret and enforce laws, rules and regulations.

As a bureaucrat.. it is their job … to help insure the perpetuation of the bureaucracy and in turn their job, paycheck and quality of life.

Those who write the laws and create the regulation may or may not know if what they are doing is legal/constitutional…but.. then they DO KNOW that someone outside of the bureaucracy will have to challenge the constitutionality of the law/rule/regulation in the court system. Those in the bureaucracy knows that it will take some MAJOR BUCKS to challenge their laws/rules/regulations in the court system. Odds are probably in their favor that someone has or willing to commit all those $$ to do the court challenge.

Let’s face us it… the legal system is like one BIG FRATERNITY and with the war on drugs funneling 51 billion/yr into the judicial system… what attorney is going to take on one of their fraternity brothers and potentially disrupt that on-going cash flow?

 

Interpretation – not the intent of the law – is the main problem ?

This Law is the Main Problem

doctorsofcourage.org/index.php/2016/05/16/this-law-is-the-main-problem/

Public Law No: 114-145
“Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2016”

Formerly S. 483, introduced on 2/12/15 by Orrin Hatch [R-UT], became law on 4-19-16. Cosponsored by Sheldon Whitehouse [D-RI], Marco Rubio [R-FL], David Vitter [R-LA], and Bill Cassidy [R-LA].  The identical House Bill was H.R. 471, introduced 1-22-15 by Tom Marino [R-PA-10] and cosponsored by Peter Welch [D-VT-At Large], Marsha Blackburn [R-TN-7], Judy Chu [D-CA-27], Doug Collins [R-GA-9] and Gus Bilirakis [R-FL-12] and which passed the House of Representatives April 21, 2015.

This law doesn’t ensure patient access at all. In fact, from the fact that multiple good doctors such as Doc. Myers and Dr. Gozy have recently been charged criminally for prescribing, my prediction is that this law will mark the end of the prescribing of opiates for pain in the United States.

The choice here was the Justice Department and how they interpret this law. But since they have, over the last 15 years, interpreted the CSA so broadly as to charge innocent doctors, such as myself, with crimes and used the “inconsistent with public health and safety” clause without justification simply just to deny certificates to anyone they choose, this law gives them even more freedom to attack good doctors. What the legislature should have done is reign in the Justice Department. Instead, they removed the bridle.

You're fired300For that reason, I recommend the firing of any legislator who voted Yea on this bill or on House Bill 471. Can that be done with the November election?  Instead of whining and moaning, all of you in chronic pain support groups, Facebook groups, and any other organization need to get busy and spread the word about any legislator whose position is being contested. You can find that list on this website under “Call to Action”.  Then get the word through letters to the remaining legislators that if this law isn’t amended to exempt physicians from any criminal charge pertaining to prescriptions written for physical patients who are seen in their offices, their jobs will end in 2 years.

Amendments to the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 823)

SEC. 2. Registration process under Controlled Substances Act. 

Section 303: adding at the end the following: “the phrase ‘factors as may be relevant to and consistent with the public health and safety’ means factors that are relevant to and consistent with the findings contained in section 101.”

Section 304

(d) the phrase ‘imminent danger to the public health or safety’ means that, due to the failure of the registrant to maintain effective controls against diversion or otherwise comply with the obligations of a registrant under this title or title III, there is a substantial likelihood of an immediate threat that death, serious bodily harm, or abuse of a controlled substance will occur in the absence of an immediate suspension of the registration.

Opportunity To submit corrective action plan prior to revocation or suspension.—Subsection (c)

“(2) An order to show cause under paragraph (1) shall—

“(A) contain a statement of the basis for the denial, revocation, or suspension, including specific citations to any laws or regulations alleged to be violated by the applicant or registrant;

“(B) direct the applicant or registrant to appear before the Attorney General at a time and place stated in the order, but not less than 30 days after the date of receipt of the order; and

“(C) notify the applicant or registrant of the opportunity to submit a corrective action plan on or before the date of appearance.

“(3) Upon review of any corrective action plan submitted by an applicant or registrant pursuant to paragraph (2), the Attorney General shall determine whether denial, revocation, or suspension proceedings should be discontinued, or deferred for the purposes of modification, amendment, or clarification to such plan.

“(4) Proceedings to deny, revoke, or suspend shall be conducted pursuant to this section in accordance with subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code. Such proceedings shall be independent of, and not in lieu of, criminal prosecutions or other proceedings under this title or any other law of the United States.

“(5) The requirements of this subsection shall not apply to the issuance of an immediate suspension order under subsection (d).”
SEC. 3. Report to Congress.

Within 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall submit a report to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate identifying—

(1) obstacles to legitimate patient access;

(2) issues with diversion;

(3) how collaboration between Federal, State, and local law enforcement and the pharmaceutical industry can benefit patients and prevent diversion and abuse;

(4) the availability of medical education, training opportunities, and comprehensive clinical guidance for pain management and opioid prescribing, and any gaps that should be addressed;

(5) beneficial enhancements to State prescription drug monitoring programs,

(6) steps to improve reporting requirements regarding prescription opioids, such as the volume and formulation, the dispensing and trends.

The report shall incorporate feedback and recommendations from patient groups, pharmacies, drug manufacturers, health care providers, state attorneys general, law enforcement agencies, insurance providers, medical societies and boards, veterinarians, public health authorities, and research organizations.

Our legal system answer to treating substance abuse and chronic pain ?

stevephoneI got a call from one of my readers today.. and was told the following story about this reader’s friend. This is a “Indiana story”…you know the “bitter pill prgm” of our infamous AG Greg Zoeller  implemented several years ago.. In the interim, Indiana has been the leading state of pharmacies robberies, leads the country in Meth Lab busts, a EPIDEMIC in Scott county of HIV+, Hep B&C forcing Gov Pence to start a clean needle exchange program in that county, and don’t forget the dramatic increase in Heroin use/abuse/death across the state and the icing on the cake was when AG Zoeller “strong armed” the Medical Licensing Board to pass EMERGENCY REGULATION that included mandatory urine testing for all pts taking long term opiates. Which the ACLU took the board to court and “bitch slapped” them because that emergency regulation was a violation of the FOURTH AMENDMENT…  UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURE..

Apparently this reader’s friend had been cut off their pain meds by their prescriber and in desperation turned to “the street” to seek pain relief. Apparently both Heroin and Cocaine became the only source that the person could find or afford to help manage their pain.

As would be expected, things went down hill and this person ended up in a rehab center in central Indiana. According to this rehab pt, there was 30 pts in rehab center … and the census was 28 chronic pain pts using Heroin because they had been cut off from their necessary medication by their prescriber and TWO RECOVERING ALCOHOLIC..

This pt is on SS/Medicare disability and is entitled to 11 days of treatment and those on Medicaid get a total of 2-3 days of treatment.  IMO, sounds like another “catch & release” program.

Is this just another example of healthcare controlled and dictated by our judicial system ?

So that you know a METH LAB when you see one…

methlabdog

what does the movie “THE MONEY PIT” and the war on drugs have in common ?

The Money Pit Poster

A young couple struggles to repair a hopelessly dilapidated house

The war on drugs was unofficially declared by The Harrison Narcotic Act 1914

In watching this movie.. it is like in 1970 when The Controlled Substance Act was enacted and the war on drugs was officially declared… on a problem that had had very little attention/maintenance for 56 yrs..

But that did not stop the FEDS from moving forward building the war on drugs on a fairly shaky foundation..

In the following 45 yrs.. the FEDS and state legislatures have poured 1.5 TRILLION trying to fix this poorly designed/maintained process, and while we continue to “throw” 51 billion/yr into this process and Pres Obama just announced that he wants another 1.1 billion for the next fiscal year.  Business can fail, airplanes can crash and boats can sink.. but anything that the bureaucracy puts together… no matter if it totally misses its goals… they keep funding the failing processes ..

congressstupid

 

Does a PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS precedes a EPIDEMIC ?

Report: Chronic, Undertreated Pain Affects 116 Million Americans

healthland.time.com/2011/06/29/report-chronic-undertreated-pain-affects-116-million-americans/

Serious, chronic pain affects at least 116 million Americans each year, many of whom are inadequately treated by the health-care system, according to a new report by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). The report offers a blueprint for addressing what it calls a “public health crisis” of pain.

The reasons for long-lasting pain are many, from cancer and multiple sclerosis to back pain and arthritis, and the chronic suffering costs the country $560 to $635 billion each year in medical bills, lost productivity and missed work.

“I’m shocked and surprised at the magnitude of [the problem],” said Dr. Perry Fine, president of the American Academy of Pain Medicine, while attending the press conference on Wednesday announcing the release of the IOM report. He was not associated with the research.

Yet the reports’ authors said they believed that they had actually underestimated the incidence of chronic pain — that which lasts 30 to 60 days or more and takes a toll on personal and professional life — because their data didn’t include people living in settings like nursing homes. Further, as baby boomers age, the rate of chronic pain increases daily.

“Pain is an experience that affects virtually every one of our citizens,” says Dr. Philip Pizzo, dean of the Stanford School of Medicine, who chaired the committee that wrote the report. “For many patients, chronic pain becomes a disease itself.”

MORE: TIME’s special report on pain

Issued at the request of Congress as part of President Obama’s health reform legislation, the report calls for a “cultural transformation” — an attitude shift on the level of that seen over the last 50 years toward smoking — to spur more coordinated action to help treat Americans’ pain. Pain patients have long been viewed with skepticism and suspicion, rather than understanding, presenting a barrier to care. Rising rates of prescription drug misuse, addiction and overdose have further led to the establishment of legal and regulatory barriers, such as prescription databases, that can prevent even legitimate pain patients from getting much-needed drugs.

“There’s abuse on both sides,” Pizzo says. “There is abuse that occurs when individuals are drug-seeking and abuse that occurs in that people who need pain medications may not have access because physicians won’t prescribe or the state has regulatory barriers.”

Making matters worse is the media and political attention that has been devoted to painkiller abuse and addiction. Conversely, very little attention is given to chronic pain, which affects a far greater number of people. About 9.3% of the population has drug or alcohol problems serious enough to require treatment, while severe chronic pain affects at least one in three Americans. (And yet, two national institutes are devoted to the research of addiction: the National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse and the National Institute on Drug Abuse. IOM committee members considered calling for a new National Academy on Pain, but ultimately decided that economic and other restrictions would preclude it at this time.)

Although prescribing of opioids has almost doubled — going from 3.2% of the population in 1988-94 to 5.7% in 2005-08 — it’s not clear that this is out of line with the rise in pain in the population or that the drugs are going to the right people.

MORE: An Addict’s Battle With Painkiller Addiction Reveals Outdated Rehab Tactics

During the press conference on Wednesday, pain patient and journalist Melanie Thernstrom, an author of the IOM report, said that committee members had received more than 2,000 comments on its website from pain patients and doctors. “It’s extraordinary how many patients describe themselves as feeling like collateral damage in the war on drugs because of extraordinarily burdensome [requirements to get opioid medications],” she said.

Thernstrom went on to describe cases in which patients who had been on a stable and effective low dose of medication for years were suddenly cut off by their doctors for no apparent reason. She also spoke of cases in which the required monthly doctor visits caused patients to take time off work and travel hours to see a doctor who would prescribe.

“Many pain patients, in fact, are paying the price for a policy not designed for their benefit,” she said, adding that doctors said they prescribed less than they thought was appropriate because of fear that law enforcement was “looking over their shoulder.”

In a passage addressing the question of painkiller misuse, the report notes in italics for emphasis that “the majority of people with pain use their prescription drugs properly, are not a source of misuse, and should not be stigmatized or denied access because of the misdeeds or carelessness of others.”

“Ironically, while many people with pain have difficulty obtaining opioid medications, nonmedical users appear to obtain them far too easily,” the report says.

MORE: Most Addicts Get Painkillers From Friends or Family, Not Doctors

But the barriers to appropriate care go beyond the issue of painkiller misuse. There are only about 3,000 to 4,000 pain specialists in the entire U.S., which means that primary-care physicians, whose numbers are also dwindling and who are not educated specifically about pain, are left to treat most pain with little specific guidance about effective care. In medical school, students receive only a few hours at most of education on pain treatment.

Meanwhile public and medical misperceptions are widespread about the nature of pain, its causes and the way it affects individual patients. Misinformation is fueled by the fact that comprehensive research is lacking, even on basic questions like how many people suffer from disabling chronic pain and how well existing drugs like opioids treat long-term pain.

Gaps in insurance coverage exacerbate many patients’ problems: health-care plans may not cover pain-management consultations or certain therapies. They may sometimes also offer perverse incentives in pain treatment, Pizzo says, describing how a plan might refuse coverage for physical therapy while covering an invasive surgical procedure, which can lead to unnecessary expenses and care.

The IOM report specifically asks the National Institutes of Health to develop a lead agency to focus on fighting pain and directs the Department of Health and Human Services to develop a major initiative against pain, involving both public and private organizations, by the end of 2012. In response to a question about how the needed changes will actually take place, Pizzo said that “will ultimately reside in accountability at many levels.”

“With tobacco and smoking, what happened is a mobilization of all the important stakeholders,” said committee vice-chair Noreen Clark of the University of Michigan.  The authors called on patient advocates to get involved and to “be aware of their strength and the important role they can play in bringing about cultural transformation.”

Added Thernstrom: “The most important message to get out is the concept of pain itself as a disease. The majority of primary care physicians do not agree with this even though there is overwhelming research in both humans and animals [showing that] pain causes damage to the nervous system. It’s dangerous not to treat pain.”