Denial of pain management never killed anyone ?

Sister of victim to fake Norco pills speaks out

http://www.abc10.com/news/local/sacramento/-sister-of-victim-to-fake-norco-pills-speaks-out/118294169

The Drug Enforcement Agency is investigating a drug crisis in Northern California, after nine deaths and 36 overdoses in Sacramento and Yolo County were reported from fentanyl disguised as Norco painkillers. Fentanyl is potentially lethal, even in small doses.

It’s considered 25 to 50 times more potent than heroin and 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine. 

Those who have been affected range from 18 years old to 59. It’s been 50 percent men, 50 percent women.

Pauline Meehan, 22, is the younger sister of Russell Meehan, 32, one of the people who died from taking the fake Norco pills.

“It could happen to anybody,” Pauline said, explaining that Russell was using Norco painkiller for a broken ankle and had a prescription.

Pauline sat down with ABC10 with the hope that speaking out might help prevent this from happening to other families.

“His laugh was so infectious. Even during family get-togethers, he was always going around to all the groups, making us feel like a family,” Pauline said. “He really was our glue.”

The “Meehan Clan,” as they were often called, is a big family of thirteen children. They’re now missing the person who held them together. A best friend, a role model, it’s impossible for Pauline to put into words what her big brother meant to her.

“He knew how to make you feel part of the group and welcomed. That’s not a characteristic a lot of people have,” Pauline said. “[He’s] so forgiving no matter what people did to him…never had a bad thing to say. That is one trait I wish I had.”

Russell had big plans for his future. He was a successful craftsman and entrepreneur, who was back in school to get more certification.

He was also the father of a little girl. “I’ve never seen anybody who loves his baby more,” said Pauline. “He was just somebody who enjoyed life.”

Even when life got tough, Russell pushed through.

Last October, when he broke his ankle in a skateboarding accident and needed a four hour surgery, in which two metal plates were inserted. Russell wore a cast for several months.

“I know it was really painful for him. When it was cold, he could feel the bar rattle on his bones,” Pauline said. “He had just recently got off crutches and was getting readjusted building muscle.”

Even that couldn’t stop Russell from spending time with his family. Two Sundays ago, Russell finished a 5k mud run through the pain.

“He’s over there encouraging my mom and sister, ‘We’re gonna make some kind of place!'” laughed Pauline. “Then more towards the end [he said], ‘I just don’t wanna be last!'”

Just a few days after that mud run, Pauline said Russell took what he thought was Norco painkillers for relief. Pauline doesn’t know where he got the fake Norco pills from, but she knows he did have a prescription.

“If that was whatever he took, the fake Norcos, to relieve some pain, I hope it did,” said Pauline. “But he didn’t take that knowing he was never gonna wake up again.”

Russell was found unresponsive and rushed to UC Davis Hospital. Although Russell is gone and his family is hurting, they’re still thinking of the people who tried to keep Russell alive.

“I know there was a lot of people working on him,” Pauline said. “They can be removed because it’s not family and they have to make objective decisions, but knowing how many people and how hard they tried…it really makes me happy.”

Russell’s funeral will be at noon on Friday, April 8, at the Klumpps Chapel of Flowers on Riverside Blvd. The family is opening it up to the public because they say Russell had so many friends they didn’t even know.

A GoFundMe page has also been set up to help with funeral costs and care for Russell’s daughter.

Accidental deaths from FALLS… TRIPLED IN TWENTY YEARS !

Accidental deaths in U.S. reach record high

http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2016/06/11/Accidental-deaths-in-US-reach-record-high/6531465667112

Looks like the National Safety Council is adding all overdose/poisoning deaths together, by any substance, to make the numbers look that much more worse/impressive ?  Since accidental deaths from falls, particularly in the elderly, have TRIPLED in TWENTY YEARS… Does this fall under the definition of a EPIDEMIC ?  Of course, a simple solution is to just have eliminate “the elderly” from our population..  Just imagine, people once they reach 65 y/o they just tend to DISAPPEAR…  Not only could we address all the accidental fall deaths… but we could solve the under funding of Medicare/Social Security was well as many state budget problems with Medicaid and under funding of retirement accounts both private and public.

A report by the National Safety Council  and lawyers for car accident victims in Rosemead revealed that a record number of Americans are dying as the result of accidents. The study showed that accidental deaths increased by 4.2 percent from the year in 2014, with accidental poisoning overtaking automotive accidents as the number one cause of death in the country.

WASHINGTON, June 11 (UPI) — The United States has seen a record rate of accidental deaths in the last two years, primarily caused by drug overdoses and falls. You can see the page to know more about accidents by accident and personal injury attorneys.

A report from the National Safety Council revealed that more than 136,000 people died accidentally in 2014, representing a 4.2 percent increase from the previous year and a 15.5 percent rise within a decade.

Overdose and accidental poisoning overtook vehicle crashes as the leading cause of death, killing 42,000 people in 2014.

Increased vehicle safety has been seen as a reason for the decrease in automotive deaths, as well as changes in drivers license requirements for teens. However, for the ones who still find them in the middle of accidents, having the contacts of personal injury or accident lawyers, as you can see it here, makes for a mandatory step. 

“Far fewer teenagers and young adults are dying on the roads than they were in 1981,” National Safety Council director Ken Kolosh said.

The use of opioids contributed to the increase in deaths by overdoses with the highly addictive painkiller killing 13,486 people in 2014.

The number of people killed in accidental falls also increased drastically, rising from fewer than 10,00 deaths in 1992 to nearly 32,000 in 2014.

Kolosh said that the primary reason for the dramatic increase in falling death was the result of an aging society.

“We have more older adults who are at much greater risk for falls,” he said.

The study states that an American dies of accidental injury every four minutes, with the rate increasing to two minutes if those who required medical help but did not die are included.

Kolosh said that the statistics do not necessarily show that Americans are accident-prone, but rather that individuals and society can do more to avoid accidents.

“Every individual has the opportunity to make choices to keep themselves safe,” he said. “It’s all preventable. Every accident is preventable, but it’s not necessarily the [fault] of the victim.”

More “JUDICIAL MEDICINE”

Study highlights multiple factors of ADHD medication use

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/06/160608112938.htm

The DEA has classified Ritalin and other such meds as a C-II… which is defined as HIGHLY ADDICTIVE… and now a study on the appropriate long term use of these medications presents no risk of addiction.  But is this  what we get when we relinquish the oversight of medical care to our judicial system  ?

Youth who take Ritalin, Adderall or other stimulant medications for ADHD over an extended period of time early in life are no more at risk for substance abuse in later adolescence than teens without ADHD, according to a new study.

Youth who take Ritalin, Adderall or other stimulant medications for ADHD over an extended period of time early in life are no more at risk for substance abuse in later adolescence than teens without ADHD, according to a University of Michigan study.

The findings also show that teens who start using stimulant medications for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder for a short time later in adolescence — during middle or high school — are at high risk of substance use.. A sigh of relief for many parents, a great post by Funeral Guide recently went through parents’ top concerns for their teen’s safety, putting prescription drug use as a new first.

The U-M research is believed to be the first national study to compare early-use and longer-duration stimulant medication therapy with nonstimulant therapy for ADHD.

A large sample size of high school seniors also meant researchers could separate doctor-prescribed ADHD medication use by gender. The results show no gender differences in the overall associations between stimulant medication therapy for ADHD and risk of substance use, said Sean Esteban McCabe, a research professor at the U-M Institute for Research on Women and Gender.

More than 40,000 individuals from 10 cohorts nationwide between 2005 to 2014, answered questions about ADHD medication use and recent substance use as part of the Monitoring the Future study.

Among the findings:

Nearly one in eight high school seniors in the U.S. have used stimulant or nonstimulant medication therapy for ADHD.

Males are more likely to use stimulant medication therapy for ADHD, while no gender differences were found for nonstimulant medication therapy.

Given that higher substance-use behaviors are associated with later initiation of stimulant medications for ADHD during adolescence, the researchers recommend monitoring this later initiation subgroup carefully for pre-existing risk factors or the onset of substance use behaviors.

 

What is it going to take to get everyone involved ?

tommy-boy-2x4-oThere are an estimated 106 million chronic pain pts and untold number of family members and healthcare professionals that are being adversely affected by the fabricated opiate epidemic. The total number could be 150 -200 million… a MAJORITY of the USA population.

The DEA has 21 district offices plus HQ sending out press releases weekly https://www.dea.gov/pr/news.shtml   and have been since 2002. One or more times a week they will fill the IN-BOX of most/all the media outlets of their actions towards this fabricated opiate epidemic and their fighting of the war on drugs.

Each of us has two Federal Senators, One Federal Representative, One state Representative and Senator and four major television channels. That is NINE contacts to let those who influence what is done in Washington, your state capital and/or your local/regional TV station news.

You don’t have to write something… there are things posted on various Face Book and other internet media. How hard is it to cut/paste these articles and send them to your legislators or media outlets.  We heard about Prince’s death for weeks… how many people heard about the 90 something husband – in FL – that killed his wife because she was in unrelenting pain and couldn’t get her pain medication ?  How many people heard about the gentleman in Montana that took a gun to his head because no doctor would treat his chronic pain ? How many other suicides because of lack of pain management has there been that has just FADED from our conscious existence without it being pointed out in the media.

And don’t think that just sending letters to your legislators is going to change their minds.. unless they are in the millions… but preface those million of contacts with unless you start talking about/addressing those who are being denied chronic pain care…  Tell them .. IF I DON’T GET APPROPRIATE CHRONIC PAIN THERAPY BECAUSE OF FED/STATE POLICIES… YOU WON’T GET MY VOTE !

If you are not registered to vote… get registered… you should be able to do it by mail… if you can’t get out to vote… you can vote by mail… If you think that speaking up will put a target on your back and cause you to loose your medications… just look at who the DEA is targeting.. prescribers that have THOUSANDS of chronic pain pts.. they are throwing THOUSANDS into the street at a time.. it is happening over and over again throughout the country… and when your prescriber is raided by the DEA… you will have a RED “A” on your forehead and in your medical records.  No other practice will touch you.

Congress has a single digit approval rating and yet 90% will get re-elected.  If you were them… would you change anything of what you are doing ?  The “powers to be” have been convinced that prescription opiates are the gateway drugs to use/abuse/death of substance abusers and with that mindset they will continue to work towards less and less opiate prescribing… even though it peaked in 2012 and has been declining every since even though use/abuse/deaths of opiate abuse is still increasing.  Never mind that opiates are pouring thru out borders from Mexico, China and a recent report that Hezbollah is selling these drugs to fund terrorism.

There is no “george” that is going to come save your ass… there is no “white knight” that is coming either. You DO NOTHING… you will end up GETTING NOTHING.

Special meeting…. special guest

LiveSupportGroup.com to Feature Fibromyalgia Doctor/Author

LiveSupportGroup.com to Feature Fibromyalgia Doctor/Author

nationalpainreport.com/livesupportgroup-com-to-feature-fibromyalgia-doctorauthor-8830714.html

By Ed Coghlan

One of the country’s leading experts on fibromyalgia is going to join a live international online discussion on Wednesday night (June 15) at 9 pm EDT.

Ginevra Liptan, MD

Author, Ginevra Liptan, MD

Dr. Ginevra Liptan, whose recently released book The Fibro Manual-A Complete Fibromyalgia Treatment Guide for You and your Doctor is doing quite well, will talk with host Robin Viola-Pfeffer about a number issue important to fibromyalgia and chronic pain patients. She will also take questions from persons who are signed up for the chat.

If you’re interested, you can join LiveSupportGroup.com for free.

“We are thrilled that Dr. Liptan is joining us. Her experiences in treating fibromyalgia will give our audience important information that can impact their lives positively,” said Viola-Pfeffer.

Dr. Liptan opened the first practice devoted to fibromyalgia six years ago outside of Portland, Oregon. She developed fibromyalgia as a medical student and in fact had to leave school for a year to research the disease.

In an interview with National Pain Report earlier this year, she said she wrote the book for both the patient and the physician.

She believes, as do many in the fibromyalgia community, that too many physicians don’t understand fibromyalgia and often it takes many visits before a diagnosis is made.

To underscore that concern, in a recent survey of fibromyalgia patients by the National Pain Report, 68% reported they had to see 3 or more doctors before their diagnosis was made.

(To see the entire survey results, click here)

Viola-Pfeffer plans to cover many of the issues that Dr. Liptan covers in her book including other diseases that are associated with fibromyalgia, how diet, exercise and meditation can help and importantly, how patients can work with their doctors to get the best possible treatment?

Dr. Liptan opened the Frida Center for Fibromyalgia which is an integrative medical clinic devoted to the study of fibro. The Frida Center uses use the most effective and well-researched therapies from both conventional and alternative medicine in a new model called functional medicine.

Livesupportgroup.com provides  those with chronic disease and conditions an anonymous on-line support community, where they can  find support, answers and available resources to help them deal/cope with their disease/conditions that impact their lives and relationships.

More “JUDICIAL MEDICINE ” ?

Michael Minas

Michael Minas, MD

doctorsofcourage.org/index.php/2016/06/12/michael-minas-md/

Michael Minas, MD, 51, a solo, independent family practice doctor in Eagle, Idaho, was indicted in June, 2014, with seventeen counts of distributing a controlled substance outside the usual course of professional practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose. He was forced to close his practice and was placed on home confinement with electronic monitoring, as if he was already a criminal. A media article at that time by Harrison Berry of the Boise Weekly stated in the first line of his article: “A Boise doctor distributed prescription drugs outside the normal course of his professional duties and has been charged with delivery of a controlled substance” like it was a statement of fact. How can a person have a fair trial with that kind of publicity?

First Dr. Minas considered accepting a plea agreement based on 17 charges, but then, like the rest of us innocent physicians, decided to trust the justice system and go to trial. So the US Attorney countered by adding 129 additional charges to ensure conviction (total of 146). A former US Attorney who escaped the illegal policies of the Justice Department said once in a seminar I went to that “they load up the charges in hopes that some will stick”.

This just goes to show how the government works. They make a point of adding charges to anyone who is innocent and chooses to fight for justice in the courtroom. But there is no justice in a courtroom. The entire operation is as crooked as a mountain goat trail with one goal: conviction of anyone that has been targeted. Why?  FOLLOW THE MONEY!!! In this case, even the judge showed obvious pro-prosecutorial prejudice, as witnessed by people who were there.

In an article by John Sowell of the Idaho Statesman, the prosecution is reported to say that Dr. Minas’s family practice clinic focused on pain, as if that was a crime. As a family practitioner whose primary practice also became pain management in a rural area because there was no one else willing, I can verify that this is not a crime and does not reflect illegal activity, but compassionate patient-oriented medicine.

They also claimed that Dr. Minas prescribed pain medicines in amounts that exceeded what would have been proper medical treatment. Who are they to determine what is “proper medical treatment”? They have no clue. But through government propaganda, they have the American people believing that whomever they claim is prescribing wrong, is doing just that. America, take off the blinders. Understand that there is a secondary gain to all of these attacks on doctors, and with the upcoming laws being considered in Congress, it is only going to get worse. Eventually there will be no doctors for the poor, disabled, uninsured, Medicare and Medicaid patients. OH!! WOW!! Do you think there might be a plan here?  Believe me, the government is laughing all the way to the bank.  FOLLOW THE MONEY!!!

Then the prosecution goes on with comments like “He did so with little to no medical basis or treatment plan, minimal, if any, diagnostic tests and little, if any, consideration of non-opioid treatment.” Again, what makes U.S. Attorneys expert in the making of medical decisions?

Next comes the warnings to physicians of the future. The new laws being presented in states and now the federal government, makes even the simplest decision in pain management by a physician criminal. Idaho has a Board of Medicine “Best Practices” plan that is enumerated at http://bom.idaho.gov/BOMPortal/BOM/PDF%20FORMS/ModelPolicyUseofOpioidAnalgesicsinTreatmentofChronicPain.pdf. The following are justifications from that plan put forth by the prosecutors for charging Dr. Minas criminally:

  1. He did not develop treatment plans for his patients.
  2. He did not establish goals.
  3. He failed to come up with ways to evaluate treatment progress.
  4. He did not initiate trials for starting patients at the lowest possible dosage.
  5. He did not establish plans to reduce the amount of painkillers patients were taking.
  6. The staff members in his office were “unqualified”, some of which were volunteers.

This is the future of attacks on pain management physicians, although this is the first of these type of charges that I have personally seen. But with the future requirement of the “best practices” approach being created through government committees, we will see more doctors being criminally convicted on decisions that are mental, using a time limit set by the government, not by medical need.

The reply by Dr. Minas’s defense attorneys C. Tom Arkoosh and James Stoll to these charges was that “his patients were maintained on varying does of pain medication therapy, which allowed these patients to otherwise live functional, if not productive, lives.”  That should be the point and accepted plan of pain management. The government needs to get out of the pain management business.

The attorneys say Minas, as one of a few independent physicians in the Treasure Valley not affiliated with the Saint Alphonsus and St. Luke’s health care systems, was targeted by the government to set an example to doctors throughout Idaho who continue to provide pain medication outside a pain clinic setting. I expand that to read “outside a hospital-owned setting.”

The lawyers also said “The government seems to make Dr. Minas the scapegoat for a broader drug problem for which he is not responsible,” My reply to this is that the government knows that the drugs and the doctors are not responsible for the drug addiction problem. They’ve known since the 1970’s but ignored the evidence. That is because at the time methadone became a government-subsidized addiction treatment.  FOLLOW THE MONEY!!! Instead of getting to the cause of drug addiction, more and more jobs and more and more money became available by treating addiction with more addictive medication.  I claim that this was the government plan all along. And now they are continuing the process with even more addictive medication—the opiate-reversal drugs of buprenorhine and naloxone. By confession from drug addicts, it is known that these drugs give highs 4x that of Oxycontin, and yet the government is now putting these drugs out there like they are candy.

There is a lot of secondary gain with maintaining the status quo. And a lot of government propaganda being spread by people “in it for the money”. One example is Brad Lamm, CIP of Breathe Life Healing Centers who wrote an article as advertisement for his rehab business entitled “Your Drug Dealer With A Co-Pay”. Supposedly Mr. Lamm is a recovering addict himself who is now supposedly 10+ years sober. The article, written in June, 2014, was a scathing attack on doctors as the cause of drug addiction, used primarily to advertise himself and his treatment center. Not a very good writer, he writes about Dr. Minas as if he was automatically guilty (even though he had only been indicted at this point), jumping around the subject of Dr. Minas, but then also talking about bad doctors in general. The standard person reading this article would assume all the comments are about Dr. Minas, but the article is written so poorly, that is hard to determine. Lamm’s prejudice and secondary gain shine through this article like the silver on a mirror.

Mr. Lamm’s obvious propaganda-driven base is what the government wants you to believe—that abuse is due to the drug, and doctors are the cause.  It is this type of ignorant writing that continues us down the wrong track when it comes to recognizing the real cause of drug addiction.  This type of mentality is what Hitler used to blame the Jews for the economic depression in Germany.  I wonder just what tie Mr. Lamm has to the government. Does he get his patient base through referrals? Maybe there is also a tie to the hospital, since Dr. Minas was one of the few independent physicians in the area.  The government is targeting the independents all over the country, and you can bet it is for a purpose. Once they have all the doctors owned by hospitals, the government then has control not only of our lives, but of our deaths. Beware of that day!

You are right about one thing, Mr. Lamm. The issue of drug abuse is greatly pressing, and it is time for us to respond. But your type of self-promoting advertisement, especially when it is obvious you don’t even know the cause of drug abuse, is of no help.

The prosecution could not attack Dr. Minas as they do so many doctors, for deaths of patients, because there were none. However, my guess is that if you go back, as I found out in my practice, that there are now patients dead because of the government action against Dr. Minas, either through intentional suicide or accidental overdose by self-treatment using street drugs.  Maybe we need to start charging US Attorneys and DEA officials with homicide and start confiscating their assets. There is probably more money to be made that way, and they are the real murderers.

But Mr. Sowell makes statements in his article that I believe are unfounded. According to him, DEA investigators claim that Minas knew his patients were drug seekers and sold their drugs.  Now the same statements were made by DEA agent Steven Tomaziefski in my case to the Grand Jury—all lies.  He committed perjury. But one thing I’ve found out through my experience is that government officials can lie and break the law without any repercussions because they have been awarded immunity by law. That is something we have to change.  Maybe back in the day when that law was written there was some honor in the profession, but no longer.  Now they do whatever they want to achieve a conviction, and innocent people are spending their life in prison.  We have to make the Justice Department responsible for their illegal actions.

In his February 11, 2016 article, Mr. Sowell writes about the three undercover police officers who came to Dr. Minas as “patients”. He states that Dr. Minas denied prescribing drugs without medical purpose. He says he spent adequate time examining these “patients” who complained of shoulder or back pain, but were lying. How can a doctor be charged with committing a crime for believing the history of a patient? Instead, those lying police officers are guilty of fraud.

According to Mr. Sowell, the first undercover officer complained of back and hip pain with a legitimate cause, reported taking anti-inflammatories without relief.  Dr. Minas’s examination supported the purported complaint, so he prescribed a limited amount of medication. On further visits when the officer attempted to get more medication, Dr. Minas suggested the man buy a yoga ball that would reduce stress on his spine, that he employ stretching exercises and that he use heat or ice, along with anti-inflammatory medication instead. That shows proper medical evaluation and treatment, not that of a “drug-pusher”.

Basically, if a person comes into a doctor’s office and signs up as a patient, whatever is prescribed should be understood and accepted as “for medical purpose”. The prosecution’s use of the terms “outside legitimate medical practice” and “without medical purpose” are to pave the way to charge the doctor with a violation of the Controlled Substances Act. But the purpose of the paragraph in the CSA [section 841(a) and section 1306.4] was to exempt doctors, not give the prosecution a means of attacking them. This method of attack has been used repeatedly in the courts and even though they know it is wrong, appeals courts have stood by the decisions of the lower court. The Supreme Court stays out of the way, allowing these illegal methods to occur, by denying petitions for a Writ of Certiorari for cases to be reviewed by them. FOLLOW THE MONEY!!!

Prosecutors also said he overprescribed pain drugs that authorities suspect were later sold on the street. So how is the doctor responsible for that? He can’t be held responsible for what he considers a legitimate patient does illegally with his medication. Did those “suspected drug dealers” ever get charged?  Probably not. I know that in my case, the people I suspected to be drug dealers were never charged with anything when I informed the drug enforcement officer in my county, Mr. Larry Finley.

Dr. Minas’s defense attorneys did try to get one thing accomplished but obviously failed. When the government raids a doctor’s office, they have no legitimate cause. They fabricate lies on their search warrant and the judges allow it. Dr. Minas’s attorneys tried to get the material obtained by the illegal search warrant suppressed as evidence. But since the judge is as much a part of the attempt to use Dr. Minas as an “example”, he refused to do so.

Dr. Minas also wrote in his affidavit that when he suspected a person was not legitimate, he refused to take them as a patient. What more can you expect from a good doctor? He was also being flooded by patients coming from another practice that had their prescription authority suspended. Obviously the legitimate pain patients in the area were being squeezed out of legitimate practices into the street.

Dr. Minas charged patients without insurance $100 per office visit. That shows compassion and caring, not drug pushing. In letters to the editor and in online posts since his arrest, many of Minas’ patients have praised him as a compassionate and caring doctor.

Here are some of those comments:

  1. Dr. Minas was my doctor from 2006 to 2013. He was always thorough and explained all my questions in detail. Thank goodness for Dr. Minas, I was diagnosed with extreme anemia. I think he saved my life.

  2. Yeah, a doctor cannot “feel” a patient’s pain. When a patient reads from a script like that, what are they to do? People are actually in pain out there people. This case will just give a message to doctors not to prescribe narcotic pain medicines when some people actually need these for chronic illnesses and pain. I hope he is acquitted.

  3. He is a great doctor being used for Federal funding of a task force and they are using him to better their task force. I have zero respect for this type of behavior from our elected officials and appointed District puppets and will not tolerate this good Dr.’s name being dragged through the mud. The Feds have torn his family apart, labeled him as a drug dealer, took his kids away, intimidated witnesses to turn against him when he was nothing but well to them. Deplorable actions from the state and feds. I expect an acquittal on this and expect him back help save lives and being a great doctor again for the city of Eagle, ID. We citizens are watching this carefully and also the people that have done this Dr. “Dirty” as well. You will all owe him a huge apology after this is all done. Stay up Mike and we all will be there for you when this is over and the Feds hold their head in shame when this is over.

  4. Perpetrators of Injustice: The Feds are too corrupt to hold their heads in shame. He was simply EASY PREY to get a quota for their cases against doctors – DEA “Diversion” program. These corrupt people love to play God and destroy good honest people. NO justice here, ESPECIALLY in this case. Wrongful prosecution. Citizens should wake up and start paying attention. The DOJ is ROUTINELY corrupt and deceitful. This is a prime example. Read DOJ prosecutor turned whistleblower – http://licensedtolie.com/ by Sidney Powell

  5. When a patient comes to a doctor and says he or she is in pain, what is a doctor to do? There is no lie detector test he/she can administer. If I am in pain and go to the doctor, I don’t want him/her to have to second-guess whether or not I’m lying. Obviously, the undercover cops were coached to say exactly what they needed to in order to get the prescription. The doctor was set up. If former patients were reselling the pain medications on the street, they are the ones who should be prosecuted, not the doctor.

  6. This is a prime example of wrongful prosecution and blatant deceit. These undercover officers HAVE to be lying and deceitful to TRAP the best doctor and most honest empathetic person that could be found here or ANYWHERE. 7. Our family has been his patients for many years – since about 2004. During that time, we have had some serious surgeries, some intermittent issues with pain, etc. We have ALWAYS been steered AWAY from pain meds and towards alternatives. NO EXCEPTIONS. This doctor is the most empathetic doctor that could possibly be found. His only crime would be believing his patients …

  7. They are criminalizing pain relief and making it impossible for people with verified chronic pain to even get Vicodin. I have an 8 level fusion and because of tightening legislation Doctors are unable to help patients like me. He is or seems like a “scapegoat” and they are making a BIG POINT HERE. DON’T HELP THE CHRONICALLY IN PAIN PATIENTS… and chronically ill patients with pain are paying the price all over Idaho. Doctors are afraid to prescribe for fear of being prosecuted. It is so sad and scary.

  8. Dr. Minas was our family doctor for many years. We have never met a more dedicated and compassionate doctor in our entire lives. He always spent time, was thorough, and wanted to get to the bottom of symptoms. We have NEVER experienced a MD with more heart and passion for what he does. This makes me sad and sick that he was set up in such a way.

Dr. Minas was convicted in May, 2016 through a prejudicial trial. He has a good lawyer willing to take his case to appeal, and hopefully will. But as usual, the government has completely robbed the doctor of all of his and his family’s assets through the two years of prosecution. We, therefore, must come to his assistance if we want to put a stop to this abhorrent treatment of good doctors. Please contribute to his legal defense and let’s get this case reversed as an example to the government that you can’t use illegal means to convict an innocent person.

It is not what you know… but… who you know…

The link between PROP (Physicians for responsible Opioid Prescribing) and the CDC and their advisory committee on opiate prescribing

http://www.thesoberworld.com/march15_issue.pdf

INTERVIEW WITH DR ANDREW KOLODNY
By Patricia Rosen

I recently had the pleasure of interviewing Dr. Andrew Kolodny who
is the Chief Medical Officer of Phoenix House, which has locations
throughout the United States, and President of Physicians for
Responsible Opioid Prescribing.
Patricia- Thank you so much for this interview. When I read about
a doctor who felt the same way that I and so many other people
throughout the country feel about the way pain pills are being
prescribed, I had to reach out to you.
Dr. Kolodny- It’s my pleasure.
Patricia- Before we speak about PROP and how you became involved
in that tell our readers a little about yourself.
Dr. Kolodny- I graduated Temple University School of Medicine,
completed my residency in Psychiatry at Mount Sinai and pursued my
interest in Public Health with a public psychiatry fellowship at Columbia
University and a Congressional Health Policy fellowship in the
United States Senate. Once that was completed I worked as Medical
Director for Special Projects in the Office of the Executive Deputy
Commissioner for the New York City Department of Health and Mental
Hygiene.
Patricia- What did you do for them?
Dr. Kolodny- My first assignment was to reduce drug overdose deaths
in New York City. This was in the beginning of the 2000’s. When you
talked about a drug overdose death, it was mostly in New York City’s
highest need, lower income minority communities that had been
hit with addiction epidemics in the past. They happened mostly in
neighborhoods like East Harlem, the South Bronx and Central Brooklyn.
Most of the overdoses were from heroin, and many of these people
were struggling with this since their addiction in the 70”s. There were
also overdoses from crack cocaine although this era was winding down.
Overdose deaths in middle class white neighborhoods were very rare.
Patricia- Was it just New York City that was affected by this?
Dr. Kolodny- Well, because I was working with the health department
on drug overdoses I was plugged into a national data base on drug
overdose deaths. As I was looking at some of the data that was
coming in from different parts of the country, I couldn’t believe what I
was looking at, especially in New England and Appalachia. I thought
they had the decimal point wrong. This is when I first realized there
was a serious problem not just in New York City but other parts of the
country as well.
Patricia- What did you do to try to reduce these deaths?
Dr. Kolodny- One of the things we did in New York City and we were
one of the first in the country to do it and do it legally, was we started
giving out Naloxone through a syringe exchange program to people
addicted to heroin so they would get training and know how to respond
to an overdose. We didn’t do this directly. We funded a project with
the harm reduction coalition. The idea was that clients of the syringe
exchange program would be taught how to rescue their peers when
they witnessed an overdose.
Patricia- So you were really ahead of your time because I know now,
15 years later they are trying to get the Naloxone Access Law passed
in many states. What is your opinion for some states not wanting to
pass that law which would enable police, EMT’s, parents, people
with drug dependency and all other emergency first responders to be
trained and equipped with Naloxone?
Dr. Kolodny- I don’t think there is much of an argument against it. I
think early on you heard that they thought it would encourage risky
use or that somehow the government was condoning drug use. At this
point I don’t think its opposition, I think its more inertia, getting states to
change their rules. It would be helpful if the federal government could do
something like that. I think we were ahead of our time because the health
commissioner at that time was Dr.Thomas Frieden who is now the director

of the CDC. Dr. Frieden was interested
in drug overdose deaths even though
they were common at that time with the
poor and non-white who didn’t vote. The
rest of the country wasn’t interested in
overdose deaths until it hit main stream
white America. As a public Health
Commissioner he cared about drug
overdose deaths before it was a hot topic
and that’s why we were ahead of our time.
Patricia- What other things did you do
to try to prevent overdose deaths?
Dr. Kolodny- Another thing which
we worked on which I feel to this day is still even more important
than access to Naloxone is to expand treatment to those addicted
to opioids. I think that the first line of treatment to those addicted to
heroin or painkillers is Buprenorphine or Suboxone. We worked very
hard to get doctors in New York City trained and able to prescribe
Buprenorphine.
Patricia- Isn’t that something for the short term?I mean do you feel
people should be on Suboxone for a long time? Sometimes you
hear of people on it for a year or 2 years. Don’t you feel it should be
something really used short term and then just tapered off of it?
Dr. Kolodny- Why would you say that?
Patricia- Because then aren’t you substituting one drug for another? I
hear of people abusing Suboxone as well.
Dr. Kolodny- Yes, but how long someone is on it has nothing to
do with the abuse of it. There is some diversion. Sometimes it’s
not prescribed responsibly. Sometimes a doctor won’t check the
urine to make sure the patient is taking it. Some doctors don’t give
more than the prescription as if somehow the prescription alone will
magically cure addiction . Many people need more than Suboxone
unless they are very stable. You do see some people trading it for
other drugs and it ends up on the black market. I don’t think you
have abuse in the sense that people are getting high from it. If your
opioid addicted and taking Suboxone regularly it’s not possible to feel
high from Buprenorphine. Some people do need it long term. Once
patients come off of it, it’s much harder for them to do well. Once
they come off their chances of relapse are greater. For some patients
the right decision for them is just to stay on it. Nobody wants to be
on a medicine long term. Think of people on medicine for high blood
pressure or diabetes. I mean if some diabetics could lose weight or eat
properly they might not need their insulin or pills. That is the better way
to go, but we would never say “ oh, you are just getting your insulin or
pills for 6 months or 8 months and then you’re on your own” People
should take these medicines for as long as they need it.
Patricia- How did you get into the addiction treatment field?
Dr. Kolodny- I got into addiction treatment through the Buprenorphine
work I did with New York City. I realized that you can save someone
from an overdose but if you want to reduce the amount of deaths you
really have to expand the treatment available. We were very interested
in Buprenorphine and Suboxone because of the French experience. In
the mid 90’s Buprenorphine became available in France to treat heroin
addiction. They didn’t have Suboxone which is Buprenorphine mixed
with Naloxone. They only had pure Buprenorphine which frequently
ended up on the black market. People were even injecting it. But
despite all of this, the drug overdose death rate declined 80% in 6
years. We were very excited about that in New York and worked very
hard to expand access to Buprenorphine. One of my jobs working for
New York City was to get doctors to use it. A lot of doctors who worked
with those struggling with heroin addiction started seeing young white
males from Staten Island, Long Island and middle aged pain patients
addicted to painkillers. It started to become clear to us that we were in

the midst of a new epidemic.
Patricia- Tell me a little bit about PROP and why and when you started it.
Dr. Kolodny- I realized we had a painkiller problem and knew we had
an opioid epidemic in the United States but didn’t know the cause very
well. There was a very important article published in 2006 that said
that overdose deaths were increasing in parallel with increases in the
prescribing of painkillers. It became very clear to me from this research
that the epidemic of overdose deaths and addiction was being caused
by doctors prescribing too much. I began to learn more about the use
of opioids especially for chronic pain and became very concerned that
doctors were aggressively prescribing these medications for conditions
that you would be more likely to hurt the patient then to help them by
putting them on opioids long term. Many doctors in different specialties
were also coming to the same conclusion that the medical community
was part of the problem. Many of our colleagues bought into this
campaign- a campaign funded by the pharmaceutical companies to
prescribe aggressively. The argument for aggressive prescribing was
very compelling. They told them things like patients were suffering
needlessly, that the compassionate way to prescribe is aggressively,
that with any complaint of pain, opioids should be the drug of choice
and they weren’t addictive. These were the messages. Many of our
colleagues bought into this. When we first started speaking out, some
of our colleagues thought we were going to punish those suffering with
pain because of bad behavior by drug abusers. That’s how we were
seen. We would say” no, no, no that’s not what’s going on!”
Patricia- Well, here in Florida we had pain clinics on just about every
corner. It was terrible. There were doctors writing prescriptions for 120
80mg pills at a time along with other pills! It was awful.
Dr. Kolodny- hmmm
Patricia- It was really a problem.
Dr. Kolodny- Yes, well we felt the prescribing was too aggressive
but we couldn’t get our colleagues that interested in what we were
saying. Initially they thought our views were too anti-opioid. Since 2010
the evidence is much clearer, and our view that opioids shouldn’t be
used LONG-TERM for MOST PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC pain is
much more an accepted position. Older less competent doctors are
still prescribing them but the younger doctors are hearing what we
are saying. The American Academy of Neurology recently issued a
statement that we should NOT be using long term opioids for lower
back pain or headaches. The federal government put out a new review
of evidence basically saying that there is no evidence that it’s effective
but LOTS of evidence that it’s dangerous.
Patricia- It’s evident by all the overdoses and people that can’t get
their pills that are turning to heroin.
Dr. Kolodny- It’s not just the young people getting addicted through
recreational use; the pain patients are being harmed.
Patricia- Yes and people in their 70’s and 80’s!
Dr. Kolodny- The rate for overdose is highest for people 45-54 who
get it prescribed by doctors.
Patricia- I didn’t know that.
Dr. Kolodny- yes, so the drug companies were saying and the pain
organizations that take money from the drug companies, they were
trying to tell the government that we have 2 problems in America. We
have drug abuse and chronic pain as a problem. They wanted policy
makers to think that these drugs were good for chronic pain and all the
harm was limited to the drug abusers. What they were really saying
to the policy makers was don’t punish the pain patients for the bad
behavior of the drug user. What PROP is saying is we don’t have these
2 distinct groups, so called drug abusers that are harmed and millions
of pain patients that are helped. There is tremendous overlap and what
we really have is an epidemic of addiction to these medicines. People
are getting addicted through medical use and recreational use but we
have to stop creating new cases of addiction and treat the people that
are already addicted if we ever hope to bring it under control.
Patricia- I would like to know when our tolerance for pain became so
low. Years ago if you broke your wrist or leg you were told you would
feel better in a day or two , take two aspirin and call your doctor in the
morning . Today they are ready to give you dilaudid or morphine for
that!
Dr. Kolodny- That was part of the campaign by the pharmaceutical
companies to make pain the 5th vital sign. Hospitals ask patients in
surveys after their hospital visit if the hospital did everything to address
their pain. So now we have hospital administrators telling doctors to
prescribe more aggressively.
Patricia- I saw it first hand with my mother which is another story but
I brought her in for nausea and they kept asking her level of pain and
giving her painkillers.
Dr. Kolodny- That’s what they do. They keep asking your pain level.
That was an aspect of a brilliant pharmaceutical campaign that paid off
very well for those companies.
Patricia- It sure did. Purma Pharma who manufactures OxyContin
made billions of dollars. What’s your opinion of the new drugs like
Zohydro and Hysingla?
Dr. Kolodny- I am very concerned that the FDA keeps approving
these drugs. The fact that some are harder to crush or snort doesn’t
make it any better or less addictive. When people become addicted,
they become addicted by swallowing the pills. I am very concerned
because when a company brings a new drug on the market, it costs
them millions and the only way to recoup their investment is to
convince doctors to prescribe it.
Patricia- That’s so true and then we will have another addictive drug
on the market.
Dr. Kolodny- What concerns me is when we are in an epidemic of
addiction and overdose deaths caused by too much prescribing of
opioid pills, the last things we need is a new opioid being released and
a marketing campaign to convince doctors to prescribe them. The FDA
keeps approving these drugs and they allow the drug companies to
promote them for conditions where their use is not safe or effective.
The CDC is trying to convince doctors not to use opioid medicine for
chronic pain, yet the FDA keeps approving new opioids and allows the
drug companies to promote them for chronic pain which I believe is a
violation of federal law. The law is called the Food, Drug and Cosmetic
Act. That law states that drug companies can only promote products
for conditions where using the product is proven safe and effective.
Since we know that long term use of opioids for most patients with
chronic pain is not safe or effective, the FDA should not be allowing
drug companies to promote that practice.
Patricia- My understanding is that the panel voted 11-2 NOT to
approve Zohydro yet it was approved anyway. Since they started The
Prescription Drug User Fee Act the FDA is getting a lot of money from the
pharmaceutical companies and unfortunately approving all these drugs.
Dr. Kolodny- Your right- the PDUFA has transformed the FDA
which was regulating pharmaceutical companies to one that now
seems more concerned with providing good customer service to
pharmaceutical companies.
Patricia- Exactly, but who is protecting us?
Dr. Kolodny- Correct. Another example, last week the FDA
approved Vyvance for binge eating disorders even though we had
an amphetamine epidemic caused by marketing amphetamines for
weight loss. That practice became prohibited but just last week the
FDA approved a new amphetamine to be marketed for so called binge
eating disorder.
INTERVIEW WITH DR ANDREW KOLODNY
By Patricia Rosen Continued from page 6
Cont

Patricia- What is the answer to stop this, is it up to the people to rally
together? How do we protect ourselves?
Dr. Kolodny- I haven’t heard the current administration mention
this epidemic at all and the FDA is their agency. They also haven’t
put in the appropriate resources for this problem. It was similar to
the aids epidemic. Ronald Reagan was criticized for not mentioning
it and ultimately did only after 20,000 people died. Why didn’t he
want to mention it? Because it involved a public health problem that
involved gay men and people with addiction. I really think this health
crisis should be handled by the Department of Health and Human
Services. You have the CDC, FDA and SAMSHA all in that agency
and they should take the lead in this. I am surprised that the current
administration is allowing the FDA to approve these drugs.
Patricia- I can see if you’re on your deathbed and they give you a drug
like that or if you have broken every bone in your body but other than
that I see no need for a drug that strong.
Dr. Kolodny- If the FDA had limited their marketing of extended
release opioids to end of life care we might not have an opioid crisis
today, but the FDA is letting drug makers promote their products for
common chronic problems.
Patricia- I want to thank you for this interview. It’s nice to know there
is a group of doctors out there trying to educate the medical field and
bring awareness to this terrible epidemic.
Dr. Kolodny- I want to thank you for all you do with The Sober World.
It’s magazines like The Sober World that help educate and keep
people informed about the latest issues in the addiction and behavioral
health field.

Dead men tell no tales ?

dea-agent-drug-busted

DEA Agent Busted for Selling Seized Narcotics – “Commits Suicide” While in Police Custody

Reynoldsburg, OH — Officer Tye Downard was arrested while on duty last week by federal agents investigating him for theft and sale of drugs. On Monday, police reported that he died in their custody.

Downard, a 20-year veteran of the Reynoldsburg Police department, was also a member of the DEA Task Force and SWAT team whose job it was to raid the homes of suspected drug dealers.

According to the US Attorney’s office, Downard was allegedly caught making over 20 different sales of narcotics in just the last five months — including heroin, cocaine, marijuana and Percocet pills.

During the investigation, according to the complaint, Downard was captured on recorded audio, recorded telephone calls, surveillance cameras, and the seizure of drugs sold to their undercover source.

During the investigation, it was discovered that Downard participated in the execution of a search warrant during which the officer seized bags of blue-and-white Percocet pills. Two days later, these same pills were never admitted into evidence and then sold to the undercover source.

On yet another occasion, Downard was a participant in a raid that yielded multiple kilograms of marijuana. The next day, Downard would sell some of this seized plant to the source.

Remarkably, none of the officers found it odd that the drugs being seized in these raids were never making it back to the evidence room. Over this short period, Downard stole and sold over $70,000 worth of drugs — and none of his fellow cops said a word — which makes the news of his ‘suicide’ that much more suspicious.

On Monday, the Reynoldsburg Police Department confirmed that Tye L. Downard committed suicide while in custody.

According to the Delaware County Sheriff’s Office, Downard, 43, of Westerville, was found dead at about 1:30 am Monday, after hourly inmate checks.

Deputies said Downard had hanged himself in his single-person jail cell.

Detectives continue to investigate the incident.

What this case illustrates is the criminal incentive created by the war on drugs and the monopoly of power granted specifically to those tasked with carrying it out. Making arbitrary substances illegal, and then tasking individuals with the control of those substances creates a temptation of easy money that is hard to pass up.

Downard’s case is hardly isolated as this scenario is but a broken record of corruption, playing over and over.

As the Free Thought Project reported last month, a California police officer was busted after driving 247 pounds of marijuana all the way across the country. Yuba County Deputy Christopher M. Heath was caught in York, Pennsylvania with a shipment of marijuana that was worth over $2 million.

This case is similar to Downard’s as Heath was an officer on a narcotics task force, meaning that he was responsible for putting nonviolent people in prison for using and selling drugs as well. Meanwhile, he was selling drugs and taking part in the same actions that he was locking people up for.

Of course, it is the view of the Free Thought Project that anyone should be able to possess marijuana, as it is an incredibly beneficial plant. While those who would lock up morally innocent people for possessing a plant are bad enough, it takes a uniquely vile individual to ruin the lives of countless individuals while at the same time committing equivalent acts.


Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world.

Might as well put a “RED A” on their foreheads ?

Melissa Pastor, 31, of Canton, shown with her daughters, was a patient of Dr.

Former patients of Dr. Frank Lazzerini worry they are stigmatized

http://www.cantonrep.com/news/20160612/former-patients-of-dr-frank-lazzerini-worry-they-are-stigmatized/?Start=1

The BUREAUCRATS are converting the doctor’s medical records to CD’s at the rate of 30/month.. it is not unusual for a prescriber to have 2500 pts… so some of the pts of this practice may have to weight SEVEN YEARS – OR MORE –  to get a digital copy of their electronic medical records.

I guess that all the doctors in this community have no faith in the accuracy of Ohio’s prescription monitoring program (OARRS)…  because if it is as good and accurate as the bureaucrats claims… those same doctors could have gotten a copy of at least the pt’s controlled substance prescriptions that they had filled.

Why couldn’t the local doctors taken the same initiative as some doctors in NY that came to the rescue of pts from a raided physician’s practice 

Another case of DEA’s “ready.. fire… aim..” 

No initiative or just a lack of backbone and balls ?  Of course, the more chronic pain  people that the DEA force into withdrawal, unrelenting pain and to the streets to seek some sort of relief… the more job security they have and the more reasons they have to ask Congress for more money to go after all of these ILLEGAL DRUG USERS..

Just another example of Congress creating the “black drug market” and then creating the mechanism (DEA) to deal with the black drug market and the DEA is just trying to perpetuate the need for their existence.  Maybe those in Congress – all of them – who condone this perpetuating of this war on drugs… needs to find themselves “out on the street” after the next election in NOV ?

Sandra Pair said since police raided the Jackson Township office of her doctor in February, more than a dozen doctors have refused to accept her as a patient.

She, and several others The Canton Repository has interviewed, are worried they have been stigmatized because of an investigation into the practice of their former physician, Dr. Frank Lazzerini.

Police raided and seized medical records from Lazzerini’s family practice. Lazzerini closed his practice after the raid, a move that left some patients in limbo, despite no charges having been filed against the doctor.

Pair said she needed a new doctor to prescribe medications to treat herniated discs in her back, diabetes, depression, bipolar disorder and other issues. She also needs her medical records. Those are in the custody of agents of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy, which was taking part in the investigation.

The 52-year-old Perry Township woman said she called at least 18 doctors and they either asked for her records to get an appointment or turned her away because she had been a patient of Lazzerini’s. None gave a reason why they were not taking any of Lazzerini’s patients, she said.

“I feel like we’re singled out like we’ve got the plague or something,” Pair said. “It’s like ‘Ohhhhh, stay away from them. … Because you’re (Lazzerini’s), you’re not entitled to medical treatment.”

Pair is one of several people who told the Repository they were patients of Lazzerini and have had difficulty finding a doctor willing to see them or prescribe them medication. They also said they’ve been unable to get their medical records.

On the way

Jackson Township Police Det. Jason Hall, who is working on the Lazzerini investigation, said the state pharmacy board contacted about 100 former patients and invited them to pick up a CD with their electronic medical records on May 13. Only about 20 to 25 showed up, Hall said.

He said investigators took the server with the electronic records during the raid and a vendor has been extracting the information and the data has been downloaded to a CD. The vendor has not yet completed extracting all the data nor prepared everyone’s CD. Investigators hope to contact the rest of Lazzerini’s patients — Hall did not know the number — at an later date for their records to be picked up. Hall said the records are available only when he’s scheduled because he has to check the patients’ ID before turning over the CD to them.

As for Lazzerini, the Jackson Township police and Stark County prosecutor’s office said they have nothing to announce.

Pair said the office of Lazzerini’s attorney referred her to the State of Ohio Pharmacy Board to get her records. But she said she hasn’t heard back from a compliance agent for the board.

  • Page 2 of 3 – A spokesman for the pharmacy board, Jesse Wimberly, said the board has had difficulty extracting the medical records from an electronic system. He said once the records are ready, the board will contact patients to inform them they can pick up their records at the Jackson Township police department.

    Account from Akron

    Larry Moore, 58, of Akron, said he saw Lazzerini for about 11 months. Lazzerini prescribed pain medication such as OxyContin, to address the pain from a fractured disc in his back and nerve damage in his arms due to a workplace accident and blood thinner medication, Moore said.

    He said he went to a Summit County hospital seeking treatment, but the staff there said a doctor could not see him unless he had his prior doctor fax Moore’s medical records to them. But investigators had his records. Moore said when he told the staff he had been a patient of Lazzerini, “They said, we can’t see you.”

    Moore said he called the state Pharmacy Board, the FBI and the Ohio Attorney General’s office seeking his records.

    “Everybody I called told me that, every last one said, we can’t get the records released. They’re part of the investigation,” Moore recalled. “I need my medical records to get my medical treatment. No doctor wants to see you without records.”

    Lazzerini’s attorney, Rick Pitinii, declined to comment.

    Moore said Akron General’s emergency room finally referred him to a family medical practice, which agreed to see him. His first appointment is scheduled for later this month.

    Blacklisted?

    Some medical providers may fear being taken advantage of by those seeking painkillers to feed their addiction.

    “If I was addicted to it, I’d be on the streets looking for it,” Pair said. “If I don’t need it, I’m not going to take it.”

    Pair said her medication ran out in March and she experienced withdrawal symptoms.

    Melissa Pastor, 31-year-old single mother of two in Canton, said she ruptured discs in her back in 2014 while lifting a crate. Pastor is the sister of Pair’s fiancee. She said after she saw an advertisement for his practice, she began getting treatment from Lazzerini in the spring of 2015. To treat back pain and sciatica pain in her legs, he prescribed her Percocet, muscle relaxants, and a steroidal medication, as well as medication to address her anxiety, weight gain and migraines.

    Pastor said while she found Lazzerini to be an “awesome” and attentive doctor who “went the extra mile,” one thing that seemed unusual was Lazzerini would prescribe her 120 pills of Percocet, an opioid pain medication drug, to last her a month when she really only needed 60 pills. She said she only used what she needed. Two days before the raid, he prescribed her 180 pills. Pastor said Medicaid covered the cost.

    • Page 3 of 3 – “With the medication and stuff, I think he kind of went overboard on that,” Pastor said.

      After the raid, Pastor said, she couldn’t get her records and several doctors’ offices and emergency care centers turned her away “they said because I was a patient of Lazzerini.”

      “I still don’t have a family doctor because as soon as you say (Lazzerini’s) name, they will not accept his patients. … They wouldn’t accept his prescriptions,” Pastor said.

      She said finally the AxcessPointe Community Health Center in Barberton agreed to see her and a doctor there gave her a referral to a pain management center.

      “Whatever (Lazzerini) did, it’s like they’re putting all the blame on us,” Pastor said. “I don’t even know what he did. … It’s not fair doctors are turning us away because of Dr. Lazzerini.”

      Reach Repository writer Robert Wang at 330-580-8327 or robert.wang@cantonrep.com. Twitter: @rwangREP

       
     

 

100 yrs of progress since our country’s “PROHIBITIONIST PEROID”

1914fordThis was “state of the art” in personal transportation

 

 

 

 

1914airplane1914radiowomenvotes whitesonly

This was “state of the art” in air travel

 

 

 

 

This is “state of the art” in home entertainment

 

Certain groups still being discriminated against and fighting for equality

wethepeople

In 1914 our Democratically controlled Congress passed and signed into law by a democratic President Woodrow Wilson  The Harrison Narcotic Act 1914   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Narcotics_Tax_Act

In the 1800s opiates and cocaine were mostly unregulated drugs. In the 1890s the Sears & Roebuck catalogue, which was distributed to millions of Americans homes, offered a syringe and a small amount of cocaine for $1.50.[6] On the other hand, as early as 1880 some states and localities had already passed laws against smoking opium, at least in public.[7]

At the beginning of the 20th century, cocaine began to be linked to crime. In 1900, the Journal of the American Medical Association published an editorial stating, “Negroes in the South are reported as being addicted to a new form of vice – that of ‘cocaine sniffing’ or the ‘coke habit.'” Some newspapers later claimed cocaine use caused blacks to rape white women and was improving their pistol marksmanship. Chinese immigrants were blamed for importing the opium-smoking habit to the U.S. The 1903 blue-ribbon citizens’ panel, the Committee on the Acquirement of the Drug Habit, concluded, “If the Chinaman cannot get along without his dope we can get along without him.”

Theodore Roosevelt appointed Dr. Hamilton Wright as the first Opium Commissioner of the United States in 1908. In 1909, Wright attended the International Opium Commission in Shanghai as the American delegates. He was accompanied by Charles Henry Brent, the Episcopal Bishop. On March 12, 1911, Dr. Wright was quoted in as follows in an article in the New York Times: “Of all the nations of the world, the United States consumes most habit-forming drugs per capita. Opium, the most pernicious drug known to humanity, is surrounded, in this country, with far fewer safeguards than any other nation in Europe fences it with.”[8] Wright further claimed that “it has been authoritatively stated that cocaine is often the direct incentive to the crime of rape by the negroes of the South and other sections of the country,” though he failed to mention specifically which authorities had stated that, and did not provide any evidence for his claim.[9] Wright also stated that “one of the most unfortunate phases of smoking opium in this country is the large number of women who have become involved and were living as common-law wives or cohabitating with Chinese in the Chinatowns of our various cities”.[10][11]

Opium usage had begun to decline by 1914 after rising dramatically in the post Civil War Era, peaking at around one-half million pounds per year in 1896.[12] Demand gradually declined thereafter in response to mounting public concern, local and state regulations, and the Pure Food and Drugs Act of 1906, which required labeling of patent medicines that contained opiates, cocaine, alcohol, cannabis and other intoxicants.[13] As of 1911, an estimated one U.S. citizen in 400 (0.25%) was addicted to some form of opium.[8] The opium addicts were mostly women who were prescribed and dispensed legal opiates by physicians and pharmacist for “female problems” (probably pain at menstruation) or white men and Chinese at the Opium dens. Between two-thirds and three-quarters of these addicts were women.[14] By 1914, forty-six states had regulations on cocaine and twenty-nine states had laws against opium, morphine, and heroin.[6][11][15][16]

Several authors have argued that the debate was merely to regulate trade and collect a tax. However, the committee report[17] prior to the debate on the house floor and the debate itself, discussed the rise of opiate use in the United States. Harrison stated that “The purpose of this Bill can hardly be said to raise revenue, because it prohibits the importation of something upon which we have hitherto collected revenue.” Later Harrison stated, “We are not attempting to collect revenue, but regulate commerce.” House representative Thomas Sisson stated, “The purpose of this bill—and we are all in sympathy with it—is to prevent the use of opium in the United States, destructive as it is to human happiness and human life.”[18]

The drafters played on fears of “drug-crazed, sex-mad negroes” and made references to Negroes under the influence of drugs murdering whites, degenerate Mexicans smoking marijuana, and “Chinamen” seducing white women with drugs.[19][20] Dr. Hamilton Wright, testified at a hearing for the Harrison Act. Wright alleged that drugs made blacks uncontrollable, gave them superhuman powers and caused them to rebel against white authority. Dr. Christopher Koch of the State Pharmacy Board of Pennsylvania testified that “Most of the attacks upon the white women of the South are the direct result of a cocaine-crazed Negro brain”.[6]

Before the Act was passed, on February 8, 1914, The New York Times published an article entitled “Negro Cocaine ‘Fiends’ Are New Southern Menace: Murder and Insanity Increasing Among Lower-Class Blacks” by Edward Huntington Williams, which reported that Southern sheriffs had increased the caliber of their weapons from .32 to .38 to bring down Negroes under the effect of cocaine.[6][11][15]

Despite the extreme racialization of the issue that took place in the buildup to the Act’s passage, the contemporary research on the subject indicated that black Americans were in fact using cocaine and opium at much lower rates than white Americans.[21

Enforcement began in 1915.[22]

The act appears to be concerned about the marketing of opiates. However a clause applying to doctors allowed distribution “in the course of his professional practice only.” This clause was interpreted after 1917 to mean that a doctor could not prescribe opiates to an addict,

since addiction was not considered a disease.

A number of doctors were arrested and some were imprisoned. The medical profession quickly learned not to supply opiates to addicts. In United States v. Doremus, 249 U.S. 86 (1919), the Supreme Court ruled that the Harrison Act was constitutional, and in Webb v. United States, 249 U.S. 96, 99 (1919) that physicians could not prescribe narcotics solely for maintenance.[14]

The impact of diminished supply was obvious by mid-1915. A 1918 commission called for sterner law enforcement, while newspapers published sensational articles about addiction-related crime waves.[23] Congress responded by tightening up the Harrison Act—the importation of heroin for any purpose was banned in 1924.

After other complementary laws (for example implementing the Uniform State Narcotic Act in 1932), and other actions by the government the number of addicts of opium started to decrease fast from 1925 to a level that in 1945 that was about one tenth of the level in 1914.[citation needed]

The use of the term ‘narcotics‘ in the title of the act to describe not just opiates but also cocaine—which is a central nervous system stimulant, not a narcotic—initiated a precedent of frequent legislative and judicial misclassification of various substances as ‘narcotics’. Today, law enforcement agencies, popular media, the United Nations, other nations and even some medical practitioners can be observed applying the term very broadly and often pejoratively in reference to a wide range of illicit substances, regardless of the more precise definition existing in medical contexts. For this reason, however, ‘narcotic’ has come to mean any illegally used drug, but it is useful as a shorthand for referring to a controlled drug in a context where its legal status is more important than its physiological effects.

The remaining effect of this act, which has largely been superseded by the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, is the warning “*Warning: May be habit forming” on labels, package inserts, and other places where ingredients are listed in the case of many opioids, barbiturates, medicinal formulations of cocaine, and chloral hydrate.

The act also marks the beginning of the creation of the modern, criminal drug addict and the American black market for drugs. Within five years the Rainey Committee, a Special Committee on Investigation appointed by Secretary of the Treasury William Gibbs McAdoo and led by Congressman T. Rainey, reported in June, 1919[24] that drugs were being smuggled into the country by sea, and across the Mexican and Canadian borders by nationally established organisations[25] and that the United States consumed 470,000 pounds of opium annually, compared to 17,000 pounds in both France and Germany.[24] The Monthly Summary of Foreign Commerce of the United States recorded that in the 7 months to January 1920, 528,635 pounds of opium was imported, compared to 74,650 pounds in the same period in 1919.[24]

Should we be glad that the rest of our ways of life have not continued to be held to the standards of the early 19th century ? As a country we have been unsuccessfully fighting this war on drugs for 45 yrs. If those in power cannot see the errors of their ways and shed the “mindset” of 100 yrs ago…  This country was founded on a revolution because of personal oppression.. while we don’t need another “war”… we have not won a war since WW II and that took two A-bombs…  Is it time… if the bureaucrats can not change their 100 y/o mindset.. maybe it is time that “We the people” have a voter’s revolution and “CLEAN HOUSE” ?

cryingeyevote