According to our President… healthcare is a RIGHT.. next time someone refuses to treat you …

Illegally obtained opioids is the “driving force” behind epidemic

New Data: Illegally obtained opioids is the “driving force” behind epidemic

The data analytics approach was used to understand the link between opioid overdose deaths and the legal use of prescribed opioids

http://wwlp.com/2016/07/26/new-data-illegally-obtained-opioids-is-the-driving-force-behind-epidemic/

BOSTON (STATE HOUSE NEWS SERVICE) – Authorized by a law signed last year to collect information from health care agencies, law enforcement departments, the court system and other state agencies, the Department of Public Health is working to demystify the data and identify previously unseen trends in the state’s opioid crisis.

In a preliminary report filed with the Legislature this month, DPH Commissioner Monica Bharel wrote that other states have already called Massachusetts to learn more about its approach to using data analytics to inform the state’s response to the scourge of opioid misuse and overdose.

“The ability to look as broadly and as deeply at public health data has been a unique challenge, but one that has given us a much greater understanding of the current opioid epidemic,” Bharel wrote. The approach “has enabled Massachusetts to serve as a national example for the possibilities of public health’s ability to leverage data warehousing to respond to pressing policy and health concerns by allowing existing data to be used in new and innovative ways to support policy and decision making.”

Working with the Center for Health Information and Analysis, MassIT, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, MassHealth, the Department of Correction and others, DPH has developed a model that allows for “simultaneous analysis of 10 data sets with information relevant to opioid deaths.”

The collaborative effort to link data sets has allowed DPH to dig into questions like, “Does an abnormally high number of prescribing physicians increase a patient’s risk of fatal overdose?”

The preliminary answer, DPH reported, is yes. The agency reported that the risk of a fatal opioid overdoses is seven times greater for individuals who use three or more prescribers within three months. DPH also reported that the concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines is associated with a four-fold increase in risk of a fatal opioid overdose.

The data analytics approach was also used to better understand the link between opioid overdose deaths and the legal use of prescribed opioids. DPH reported that “at least” two out of every three people who died of an opioid overdose had been prescribed an opioid between 2011 and 2014.

But just 8.3 percent of those decedents had an active opioid prescription in the same month as their death, DPH said, and in 83 percent of opioid overdose deaths that had a toxicology report completed the person who died had “illegally-obtained or likely illegally-obtained substances” in their system at their time of death.

In its report, DPH points to the information on illegally-obtained substances as “evidence to support an emerging hypothesis that illegally-obtained substances are the driving force behind” the state’s epidemic.

Since 2000, Massachusetts has seen a 350 percent increase in opioid-related deaths — from 338 in 2000 to an estimated 1,526 in 2015 — including record-setting numbers of deaths in each of the last four years, according to DPH.

 

The USA is violating human rights per UN… without consequences ?

stevemailboxIn April of 2015 a handful of us got together and I wrote a formal complaint to the United Nation Humane Right Commisioner,,because people were/are dieing,,and the hope was/is to stop 1 more good soul from being forced into choosing death as their only option to stop their physical pain from untreated physical pain from medical illness.,,At that time that petition 2 congress ,”due no harm,” only had 6,000 letters sent to our senators and thee president .I sent every letter to the U.N in Geneva,,they are heartbreaking..Now,,their are 30,000 letters sent to our elected officials..They know full well the willfull sufferings and torture and GENOCIDE they have caused..
The U.N responded to our letter by stating that denying access to medicine needed to lessen physical pain was inhumane and should not be allowed..as it is essential to proper medical care..They further their message in April 2016 infront of all countries including the United States,,in a Emergancy session addding this very issue to thee agenda of that meeting,,Again,the U.N Commision on human rights reiterated DO NOT deny access to needed medical treatment .AND IT SHOULD never be acceptable TO DENY MEDICAL CARE TO THE PHYSICALLY ILL IN PHYSICAL PAIN FROM MEDICAL ILLNESS,…,,However,,,’our”’ country in jmo,,spit in their faces,,with bringing out the cdc guidelines after the U.N stated NOT to deny us the medical care we need,,and all individual states did the exact same thing..I personal informed my senators,,ie Tammy Baldwin,,that I had written the U.N,,about denying us care and furthermore to please allow on allll death certificates a option for all coroners to put ,”death due to untreated physical pain from medical illness,” I was told,,”PROVE IT,”!!N ow thank god,,by doctor has not taken my meds away,,,or I would of done just that,,,proved it,,,..Our government knows exactly what their doing,,,and they simple don’t care,,and will not stop until they are stopped,,,Prohibition was wrong in the late 1800 ,,and it is still wrong in 2016,,,klondyn,,the cdc,dea,hhs, all of them,,should face a Interational Court Of Law for crimes against humanity and the medically ill,,,,,Klondyn should rot in prison,,,along w.those in the dea who went after our good innocent Doctors,,!!!

img20160812_09181108

img20160812_09045642

img20160808_15350174

PAIN affects you emotionally, mentally, physically. You cannot sleep

Television hostess Lara Spencer arrives at the Metropolitan Museum of Art Costume Institute Benefit celebrating the opening of Alexander McQueen: Savage Beauty, in New York, May 2, 2011. REUTERS/Mike Segar (UNITED STATES - Tags: ENTERTAINMENT FASHION) - RTR2LWYTLara Spencer to undergo hip replacement surgery at 47

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2016/08/11/lara-spencer-to-undergo-hip-replacement-surgery-at-47.html

Lara Spencer announced on Thursday morning that she’ll be undergoing hip replacement surgery this Saturday.

“I waited for a long time before I did anything about it or told anyone because it’s an old person’s problem and I just couldn’t believe it,” the “Good Morning America” co-anchor shared on the ABC show.

Spencer, 47, has led a very active lifestyle — having once been a competitive diver at Penn State. Today, she’s an avid tennis player. “I love sports, I love being active, I love challenging myself,” she said. “I was a jock growing up from the time I could walk.”

Dr. Peter Moley tells the show that 10 percent of all hip-replacement patients are under the age of 50.

Spencer said she has a genetic predisposition to hip dysplasia. “It was embarrassing to share and then I realized there is nothing to be embarrassed about,” she said.

“If you don’t talk about it, you can’t fix it, so I’m happy if I can save one person from not having to go through the pain,” Spencer explained.

As the mother of two painted, the pain had become too difficult to manage. “There is no ignoring it at this point,” Spencer said. “I just want to say anybody out there who suffers with chronic pain, I feel you. It takes over your life. It affects you emotionally, mentally, physically. You cannot sleep. It’s hard to think about. It’s gnawing at you all the time.”

If you are having serious trouble sleeping, visit https://observer.com/2020/09/best-cbd-oil-for-sleep/ to read articles about CBD health benefits such as reduce anxiety, insomnia, pain, improve mood and more.

Although she’s a competitive athlete, she’s “terrified” to go under the knife. But as ABC News Chief Women’s Health Correspondent Dr. Jennifer Ashton explains, “Spencer will be walking on her new hip the same day as surgery. She can expect to undergo another three to six months of rehabilitation.”

“What I wish I would have done is just taken care of this sooner and spoken up,” Spencer noted.

Assisting suicide without getting any “blood on your hands ” ?

RxtotheheadIs Suicide a Consequence of the CDC Opioid Guideline?

http://www.painmedicinenews.com/Commentary/Article/08-16/Is-Suicide-a-Consequence-of-the-CDC-Opioid-Guideline-/37442/ses=ogst

By Lynn R. Webster, MD

image

The law of unintended consequences states that the actions of people, and especially of governments, always have effects that are unanticipated, as when legislation and regulation aimed at righting a problem go wrong in other ways (Unintended consequences. http://tinyurl.com/?8p8g). An example may be the guideline issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) discouraging the use of opioids in treating chronic pain, excluding cancer and end of life (MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65:1-49).

The guideline was not intended to be mandatory; yet, as I predicted in a previous roundtable discussion, the stature of the CDC appears to have resulted in it being viewed by many as more than a guideline (“Draft CDC Opioid Guideline: Pain Medicine Experts Discuss,” Pain Medicine News January/February 2016). A growing number of reports suggest that the guideline is responsible for people with chronic pain throughout the country being tapered or withdrawn from opioids or dropped entirely from physicians’ practices, even if the patients have been on stable doses of opioids for years with attendant improved pain and quality of life (Chronic pain patients are suffering because of the US government’s ongoing War on Drugs. Quartz. http://qz.com/?694616).

Pain News Network reports that dozens of patients have contacted the editor since March, when the guideline was made public, to say that their doctors have “fired” them on flimsy excuses, or that their doctors suddenly are weaning them off opioids or abruptly cutting them off from the medications (Are CDC Opioid Guidelines Causing More Suicides? Pain News Network May 27, 2016).

Worse is that some patients are so despondent and in so much pain that they have given up and looked to suicide as a way out. As Pain News Network reports, nearly 43,000 Americans committed suicide in 2014, more than twice the number of deaths that have been linked to overdoses of opioid pain medications. Anecdotal reports that chronic pain contributes greatly must not be dismissed. I am certain this is not a consequence intended or anticipated by the CDC, but tragically it is playing out.

‘Everyone Has a Breaking Point’

The following are passages from a message I received from a person in pain, in response to one of my blogs. (They have been edited for clarity.)

“After this Easter, my life turned off a cliff and nosedived. My best friend in the world, who suffered with chronic pain, checked out because he was tired of living with pain, doctors and judgment. He was just tired of it all. So many people are disgusted with the CDC’s guidelines—as am I—as they cast far too wide of a net and caught a lot of innocent victims in it.”

image

This man, a veteran, goes on to write of his personal involvement and knowledge of the opioid crisis as a sufferer of chronic pain and father who lost a 21-year-old daughter to—as he puts it—“the OxyContin Express that roared through Florida.”

“Persons in power too often see the world in black and white. They forget there is a gray area where most of us live—reality.”

The Department of Veterans Affairs is adopting the guideline, which was written to be voluntary, “as law,” he writes, “ripping 12-year–compliant patients off meds.” He is one of those patients with many years of passed urine drug screens and prescription drug monitoring checks behind him.

“This is the kind of foolishness that pushed my pal to the point he felt backed in a corner, put a gun to his chest, and pulled the trigger. I knew this man 35 years. … Everyone has a breaking point.”

This friend had shared his fears of having his treatment taken away.

“He asked me if I would forgive him if he took his own life. I told him I would. This has been a heavy burden to carry. But loving someone unconditionally comes with a heavy load.”

Now 58, the man who wrote this letter said he flinches now when he hears of anyone taking his or her life due to untreated pain. Further, he is steeling himself to deal with his own pain issues as changes to his medical treatment appear inevitable and also—as he puts it—impersonal.

“So now at 58 years old, here we go again. … The way my medical conditions were being treated for the past 12 years was about to change. … I’m no doctor, no pharmacist, no rocket scientist, but even I know you can’t do that to a human being without reprisal. So here I am picking up the pieces. I hope and pray others make it through the changes OK. I hope I make it OK.” Making it through is all he wants.

Innocent Victims

Undeniably, the country is experiencing a serious opioid crisis, which must be addressed. However, the steps to reverse the opioid crisis should not cause greater harm to the innocent and those hurting the most in our society. Our politicians and policymakers must be advised that their actions have unintended consequences. If the unintended consequences of the guideline cause greater harm than the intended positive consequences, then the only rational and compassionate path forward is to change the focus and direction. Perhaps it is time to recognize the needs of people in pain with an urgency equal to that for people with opioid addictions.

The constitutionality of it all ?

§3331. Oath of office

An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.

This AM I was watching Fox Business channel and Judge Andrew Napolitano  was discussing the DEA using travel records of citizens and approaching people in train stations, airports and the like.  Convincing people to let them search their luggage and if they found any money in their luggage.. they bring a drug sniffing dog and lets the dog sniff the money and if the dog reacts… the DEA uses the civil forfeiture law to confiscate the money.. the vast majority of our paper money will test positive for some residue of some opiate.  The person is never charged with any crime. Actually the MONEY is charged with the crime of having tested positive for opiates, and trying to get it back… you will be lucky to get a fraction of it returned to you.  Reportedly, the DEA has confiscated some 200 million dollars in this manner.

Judge Napolitano said that the DEA has the right to seize the money because of a particular law/statue on the books.. HOWEVER.. it is the Judge’s opinion is that the statue/law itself is UNCONSTITUTIONAL !

Currently our Congress is 43% attorneys ( 170 House, 60 Senate)  and I suspect that .. that per-cent has changed very little over the years.  So we have close to a majority of attorneys in Congress that have passed laws that they knew or should have known was unconstitutional.  We an Attorney General that has not advised the President that a bill that he is signing into law is unconstitutional ?

The question is … how many laws do we have that are basically unconstitutional.. yet enforced ? Are these members of Congress violating the oath they took when they came to Congress ?  If/when a law is challenged in our courts and the law is determined to be unconstitutional… should all those who voted for and/or signed into law be recalled or impeached ?

The USA has been around for 240 yrs and yet Congress finds the need to pass some 300-400 new laws every year.  When is enough is enough ?

25 states have legalized MJ… aren’t we a country ruled by the majority ?

charlesbrownDEA Denies Petition To Reschedule Marijuana For Medical Use, To The Detriment Of Patients

http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidkroll/2016/08/11/dea-denies-petition-to-reschedule-marijuana-for-medical-use-prolongs-human-suffering/#7c2528c51a3b

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency has denied petitions by two former state governors and a New Mexico psychiatric nurse practitioner to remove marijuana from the most restrictive classification of controlled substances.

In a 180-page document to be published Friday, August 12 in the Federal Register, the DEA has deemed that marijuana has no legitimate medical use and while also possessing substantial risk for abuse and physical dependence. The determination is based largely on an evaluation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

The ruling flies in the face of the 25 states who’ve passed medical marijuana provisions. And, to some marijuana proponents, the decision fuels speculation that the FDA and DEA are favoring the pharmaceutical development of prescription products containing specific, isolated or synthetic marijuana components.

 Chemicals from marijuana are already used medically

In one sense, denial of the medical value of marijuana is disingenuous, particularly in cancer pain or the nausea, vomiting and anorexia of cancer and cancer chemotherapy. In these cases, the FDA has already approved for medical use pharmaceutical products derived from marijuana.

One is dronabinol (Marinol; AbbVie), the generic name for synthetic delta9-THC, the primary neurochemically active component of plants from the genus Cannabis. It was approved way back in 1985 to stimulate appetite in patients suffering from the anorexia of HIV/AIDS and for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

The second is nabilone (Cesamet; Meda Pharmaceuticals), also approved in 1985 for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting as well. Nabilone is a chemically-synthesized THC relative that doesn’t occur naturally.

The FDA is also currently fielding clinical trials of a mouth spray containing cannabidiol (Epidiolex; GWPharma) for debilitating childhood seizure disorders. GWPharma has a related oromucosal spray product containing nabiximols called Sativex that’s available in 15 countries for the treatment of spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis and cancer and neuropathic pain, and is approved in another 12 countries. The GWPharma products differ from the others in that the products that use super-cold liquid carbon dioxide extractions of Cannabis plants that the company has developed to produce reproducible amounts of THC, cannabidiol, or both, along with many of the plants’ other cannabinoid chemicals.

Pro-pharma conspiracy against marijuana?

The DEA report estimates that 18.9 million U.S. citizens already use marijuana, recreationally or medically. On one hand, a product that you can grow at home or purchase legally in certain states shouldn’t be restricted by the federal government. I’ve been a homebrewer of my own craft beer throughout my life, producing intoxicating ethyl alcohol, or ethanol, with yeast feeding on sugars dissolved by heating germinated barley. States regulate and tax the sale of products containing this alcohol and the federal government maintains a regulatory authority called the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).

The difference between homebrewed alcohol and marijuana is that the plant was placed on the U.S. Controlled Substances list of “scheduled” drugs when Congress passed legislation in 1970. Signed by President Richard Nixon, the Controlled Substances Act consolidated more than 200 laws regulating different drugs since the 1906 Food and Drugs Act. The Drug Enforcement Agency was then established in 1973 to, well, enforce the provisions of the Act.

The highest restriction, Schedule I, is for agents with no known medical use. These include chemicals like heroin, LSD and mescaline, as well as the peyote cactus from which mesacline is derived. Classification on Schedule I effectively criminalizes the possession and sale of such agents. Highly addictive opioid pain relievers like morphine and oxycodone represent the most restrictive class of medically useful drugs and are listed in Schedule II. Medically useful compounds with progressively lower potential for abuse or physical dependence are in Schedules III, IV and V. Drugs with no known abuse potential are exempt from the Controlled Substances Act.

 

The DEA has previously downscheduled a substance previously on Schedule I, THC, in order for the FDA to approve Marinol in 1985. But that was in response to a shepherded process by the FDA for the development of a new drug using the Investigational New Drug Application process. To simplify a complicated and expensive process, the FDA requires that a new medicine meet five requirements:

  1. the drug’s chemistry must be known and reproducible
  2. there must be adequate safety studies
  1. there must be adequate and well-controlled studies proving efficacy
  2. the drug must be accepted by qualified experts
  3. the scientific evidence must be widely available

The problem with downscheduling marijuana is that it must be shown to have medical uses that meet these five criteria. But researchers object that it’s difficult to obtain marijuana to do this research. Currently, researchers must obtain the products from a regulated farm at the University of Mississippi. The DEA and FDA claim that they are committed to medical research of marijuana safety and effectiveness:

The DEA and the FDA continue to believe that scientifically valid and well-controlled clinical trials conducted under investigational new drug (IND) applications are the most appropriate way to conduct research on the medicinal uses of marijuana. Furthermore, DEA and FDA believe that the drug approval process is the most appropriate way to assess whether a product derived from marijuana or its constituents is safe and effective and has an accepted medical use. This pathway allows the FDA the important ability to determine whether a product meets the FDA criteria for safety and effectiveness for approval.

In support of this contention, the petition denial includes provisions for research marijuana to be made more widely available by growers who apply for licensure with the DEA.

But other practical research hurdles exist in meeting the five-part requirements, not the least of which is a company sponsor willing to make an investment of hundreds of millions to several billion dollars to progress through the drug approval process for a plant that can be grown by anyone.

Lack of capital notwithstanding, the first problem, the drug’s chemistry, is the kind of thing being addressed by GWPharma. Their oral spray is made from a highly defined extract of specific Cannabis cultivars. Homegrown marijuana or that purchased in states where it can be used legally under state laws can vary considerably in its chemical content and may not be reproducible from batch to batch.

Another problem with marijuana under this framework is the adequacy of safety and efficacy studies. The typical means of marijuana administration–smoking–is not considered safe or capable of administering a known amount of bioactive chemicals with reproducible pharmacokinetics. Orally administered marijuana–marijuana edibles–could potentially meet the necessary research framework but the type of matrix in which the marijuana is extracted and packaged can vary considerably. Most high-quality marijuana research these days involves the use of marijuana vaporizing equipment.

The need for acceptance by qualified experts and the wide availability of scientific evidence negates the widespread anecdotal evidence that users, particularly cancer patients, insist shows that marijuana relieves their pain and suffering.

But just as the scientific and medical community downplays herbal medicine enthusiasts about their positive anecdotal experiences with dietary supplements, the community must be consistent with the invalidity of anecdotal reports alone.

And despite my training and decades as a medical researcher, I feel that the anecdotal experience of patients is so overwhelming that federal allowances should have been relaxed to permit medical marijuana use while a structured national research strategy is developed for medical evaluation of marijuana.

Put simply, failure to downschedule marijuana is prolonging human suffering.

While the next best thing would be to fast-track the products under development by GWPharma that best approximate the marijuana plant, the costs of getting a Sativex or Epidiolex prescription and purchasing the drug will be far more financially and practically burdensome on patients with cancer, HIV/AIDS, multiple sclerosis, seizure disorders and others. I can sympathize with people who claim the system favors the pharmaceutical industry when one could either grow one’s own marijuana or purchase it at a federally authorized dispensary.

The discordance of federal and state laws on medical marijuana poses other financial issues on the burgeoning medical and recreational marijuana industries but that’s more peripheral to the story I’m presenting today.

But among other issues I’ve been considering, marijuana has the potential as an alternative or adjunct to opioid pain relievers and should be considered among our options to alleviate the opioid epidemic. To me, it’s an important question that should also be considered while marijuana is federally prohibited by people who are suffering from acute and chronic diseases.

I welcome the input of medical marijuana users, researchers, regulators and any other interested folks here in the comments or by Gmail to my news tips account, tips4davidkroll.

Upcoming CDC Webinar Highlights Agency’s Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain

Upcoming CDC Webinar Highlights Agency’s Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain

The next CDC webinar, “Dosing and Titrating Opioids,” will be held on Wednesday, August 17, 2016, at 2 PM (ET) as part of a free continuing education (CE) webinar series for health care providers on the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain. The webinar will be available as a live webinar broadcast, and CE credit may be earned after participating. The contents of the August 17 webinar will include a case study to guide clinicians through safe opioid prescribing practices. Clinicians will learn about the association between opioid dosage and opioid therapy benefits and harms.

The CDC website contains information for participating in this webinar. Health care providers who seek to earn CE credit will need to register online. The passcode to participate is 3377346, and the conference/meeting number is PW8523118.

The last webinar on this topic, “Assessing Benefits and Harms of Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain,” was held on Wednesday, August 3, 2016. All CDC webinars are archived on the CDC website.

A EPIDEMIC .. that no one wants to talk about ?

Local Pharmacies Putting Patients At Risk With Dispensing Errors

 

Elderly Hospital Patients Arrive Sick, Often Leave Disabled

Elderly Hospital Patients Arrive Sick, Often Leave Disabled

About 1/3 of patients over 70 leave more disabled than when they arrived

http://www.medpagetoday.com/Geriatrics/GeneralGeriatrics/59594

SAN FRANCISCO — Janet Prochazka was active and outspoken, living by herself and working as a special education tutor. Then, in March, a bad fall landed her in the hospital.

Doctors cared for her wounds and treated her pneumonia. But Prochazka, 75, didn’t sleep or eat well at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center. She became confused and agitated and ultimately contracted a serious stomach infection. After more than 3 weeks in the hospital and 3 more in a rehabilitation facility, she emerged far weaker than before, shaky and unable to think clearly.

She had to stop working and wasn’t able to drive for months. And now, she’s considering a move to Maine to be closer to relatives for support.

“It’s a big, big change,” said her stepdaughter, Kitty Gilbert, soon after Prochazka returned home. “I am hopeful that she will regain a lot of what she lost, but I am not sure.”

Many elderly patients like Prochazka deteriorate mentally or physically in the hospital, even if they recover from the original illness or injury that brought them there. About one-third of patients over 70 years old and more than half of patients over 85 leave the hospital more disabled than when they arrived, research shows.

As a result, many seniors are unable to care for themselves after discharge and need assistance with daily activities such as bathing, dressing, or even walking.

“The older you are, the worse the hospital is for you,” said Ken Covinsky, a physician and researcher at the University of California, San Francisco division of geriatrics. “A lot of the stuff we do in medicine does more harm than good. And sometimes with the care of older people, less is more.”

Hospital staff often fail to feed older patients properly, get them out of bed enough or control their pain adequately. Providers frequently restrict their movements by tethering them to beds with oxygen tanks and IV poles. Doctors subject them to unnecessary procedures and prescribe redundant or potentially harmful medications. And caregivers deprive them of sleep by placing them in noisy wards or checking vital signs at all hours of the night. Residents of nursing homes may also be subjected to various types of abuse and they may need to hire a retirement home abuse lawyer to file a lawsuit. Make sure to contact nursing home abuse lawyers like this elder neglect lawyer Orange County for immediate legal assistance. Nursing home neglect attorneys have the necessary expertise that can help victims seek compensation.

Interrupted sleep, unappetizing food and days in bed may be merely annoying for younger patients, but they can cause lasting damage to older ones. Elderly patients are far different than their younger counterparts — so much so that some hospitals are treating some of them in separate medical units.

San Francisco General is one of them. Its Acute Care for Elders (ACE) ward, which opened in 2007, has special accommodations and a team of providers to address the unique needs of older patients. They focus less on the original diagnosis and more on how to get patients back home, living as independently as possible.

Early on, the staff tests patients’ memories and assesses how well they can walk and care for themselves at home. Then they give patients practice doing things for themselves as much as possible throughout their stay. They remove catheters and IVs, and encourage patients to get out of bed and eat in a communal dining area.

“Bed rest is really, really bad,” said the medical director of the ACE unit, Edgar Pierluissi. “It sets off an explosive chain of events that are very detrimental to people’s health.”

 

Such units are still rare — there are only about 200 around the country. And even where they exist, not every senior is admitted, in part because space is limited.

Prochazka went to the emergency room first, then intensive care. She was transferred to ACE about a week later. The staff weaned her off some of her medications and got her up and walking. They also limited the disorienting nighttime checks. Prochazka said she got “the first good night of sleep I have had.”

But for her, the move might have been too late.

“She will not leave here where she started,” Pierluissi said several days before Prochazka was discharged. “She is going to be weaker and unable to do the things you really need to do to live independently.”

Not a Priority

How hospitals handle the old — and very old — is a pressing problem. Elderly patients are a growing clientele for hospitals, a trend that will only accelerate as baby boomers age. Patients over 65 already make up more than one-third of all discharges, according to the federal government, and nearly 13 million seniors are hospitalized each year. And they stay longer than younger patients.

Many seniors are already suspended precariously between independent living and reliance on others. They are weakened by multiple chronic diseases and medications.

One bad hospitalization can tip them over the edge, and they may never recover, said Melissa Mattison, chief of the hospital medicine unit at Massachusetts General Hospital.

“It is like putting Humpty Dumpty back together again,” said Mattison, who wrote a 2013 report detailing the risks elderly patients face in the hospital.

Yet the unique needs of older patients are not a priority for most hospitals, Covinsky said. Doctors and other hospital staff focus so intensely on treating injuries or acute illnesses — like pneumonia or an exacerbation of heart disease — that they can overlook nearly all other aspects of caring for the patients, he noted.

In addition, hospitals face few consequences if elderly patients become more impaired or less functional during their stays. The federal government penalizes hospitals when patients fall, get preventable infections or return to the hospital within 30 days of their discharge. But hospitals aren’t held accountable if patients lose their memories or their ability to walk. As a result, most don’t measure those things.

“If you don’t measure it, you can’t fix it,” Covinsky said.

Improving care for older patients requires an investment that hospital administrators are not always willing to make, experts said. Some argue, however, that the investment pays off — not just for older people but for hospitals themselves as well as for a country intent on controlling health care spending.

Though research on the financial impact of problematic hospital care for the elderly has been limited, a 2010 report by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General found that more than a quarter of hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries had suffered an “adverse event,” or harm as a result of medical care.

Those events, such as bed sores or oxygen deficiency, cost Medicare about $4.4 billion annually, according to the report. Physicians who reviewed the incidents determined that 44% could have been prevented.

In addition to outright mistakes, poor or inadequate treatment in hospitals leads to needless medical spending on extended hospital visits, readmissions, in-home caregivers and nursing home care. Nursing home stays cost about $85,000 a year. And the average hospital stay for an elderly person is $12,000, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

“If you don’t feed a patient, if you don’t mobilize a patient, you have just made it far more likely they will go to a skilled nursing [facility], and that’s expensive,” said Robert Palmer, director of the geriatrics and gerontology center at Eastern Virginia Medical School and one of the brains behind the idea of ACE units.

ACE units have been shown to reduce hospital-inflicted disabilities in older patients, decrease lengths of stay and reduce the number of patients discharged to nursing homes. In one 2012 Health Affairs study, Palmer and other researchers found that hospital units for the elderly saved about $1,000 per patient visit.

A Different Life

After coming home, Prochazka said she felt weak. It took weeks of walking her labradoodle, Gino, to regain strength.

Her stepdaughter, Gilbert, said Prochazka has started to improve. “We knew she was getting better when she was getting ornery,” she said.

But Prochazka, who is highly educated, still has some short-term memory loss, Gilbert said.

Prochazka knows that her life after hospitalization is different than before — she will have to depend more on others. It’s not an easy adjustment, she said.

“I have been somebody who has always been both mentally and physically active,” she said. “Before I fell … I was respected for what I have and what I did and all of a sudden, I’m not.”

She said her time at San Francisco General was frustrating. Getting the infection just as she was starting to recover was especially hard, she said. “I felt like I had been dealt a blow I really didn’t need.”

For other patients, being admitted proactively to the special geriatric unit can stave off such precipitous declines.

Rosenda Esquivel, 80, spent 18 days at San Francisco General, much of it in the unit, this spring. She suffered no noticeable setbacks, physical or mental, during her time in the hospital, according to Annelie Nilsson, a clinical nurse specialist in the unit.

Esquivel, an animated woman who used to work as a home caregiver, was admitted with intense arthritic pain and, while hospitalized, underwent a procedure to address an abnormal heartbeat.

Soon after her arrival, Pierluissi, the ACE unit medical director, speaking to Esquivel in her native Spanish, sought to determine how independent she was at home. He learned that a friend helped take care of her but that she took pride in cooking and cleaning for herself.

The doctor noticed that Esquivel needed help to get up from a chair but that she could get around with a walker. Her memory, though, wasn’t too strong. A few minutes after hearing three words — “honesty,” “baseball,” and “flower” — she could only recall one of them.

Pierluissi came up with a plan for her time in the hospital: Get Esquivel’s pain under control. Make sure she walks three or four times a day. Arrange for her to have a caregiver at home to remind her to take her diabetes and blood pressure medications.

Then, release her as fast as possible.

“The less time she spends here, the better,” Pierluissi said.