The truth and all the truth that “the spin” will allow ?

daffydizzy (1)Report: Pills in Prince’s home mislabeled, contained fentanyl

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/22/health/prince-pills-fentanyl/

It is amazing how some reporters have to spin the TRUTH to make a point.  It has been reported that the tablets found in Prince’s position was a “Watson 385”.  This tablet was a commercial product containing 7.5 mg of Hydrocodone and 500 mg of Acetaminophen.  But about 3 yrs ago, all production of opiates with more than 325 mg of Acetaminophen could no longer be legally produced in the USA.  This product was replaced with a 7.5 mg Hydrocodone and 325 mg of Acetaminophen.

To the best of  my knowledge there is NEVER BEEN a legally produced, commercially available Fentanyl in a tablet form in the USA.  So to suggest that the manufacturer “mislabeled” the product is so small a possibility it is virtually NON-EXISTENT. 

There have been reports of ILLEGAL produced tablets that resemble both NORCO and Xanax that contained Fentanyl.. One thing that they did not clarify is that the Fentanyl that is legally available in the USA is Fentanyl Citrate.. the illegal products contain Acetyl Fentanyl and a new variation coming in from China furanyl fentanyl. Both of which are less potent than the Fentanyl citrate.  That single determination would have clarified if the tablets that Prince took were legally manufactured in the USA.

The question has to be asked … was Prince one of those 1%-2% of chronic pain pts that became addicted. Could he not find a doctor to treat his chronic pain (hip ?) adequately and resorted to getting his hands on something to allow him to continue doing is job of preforming ?

IMO.. because this was a OD death of a high profile person.. most of the details of his death will be kept confidential. So the truthful facts may never be known… just the spin that the media can put on this story…

Image result for watson 385

(CNN)Pills seized inside Prince’s Paisley Park compound by investigators were labeled as hydrocodone but actually contained fentanyl — the drug that killed the singer — according to a source with knowledge of the investigation who revealed the information to the Minneapolis Star Tribune.

The revelation gives more insight into what may have caused Prince’s overdose. There are two likely possibilities: Either a pharmaceutical manufacturer mislabeled the pills, or the pills were illegally manufactured and obtained illegally.
However, according to the Star Tribune, investigators are working under the theory that the pop star did not know the pills contained fentanyl. Prince died on April 21 from an accidental overdose of fentanyl, according to the medical examiner.
Is Prince overdose a wake-up call for doctors?

 
If the manufacturer mislabeled the pills, there would have likely been a recall, as fentanyl is an extremely potent opioid medication and a controlled substance. It would be a serious health hazard if a batch was mislabeled and given to the public.
Fentanyl is 50 times more potent than heroin and up to 100 times more potent than morphine.
Unintended consequences: Why painkiller addicts turn to heroin

 
Investigators have not said whether Prince ingested those pills or whether he knew the pills contained fentanyl.
Star Tribune sources said Prince’s toxicology report, which has not been released, also revealed the presence of lidocaine, alprazolam and Percocet in his system.
CNN’s Dr. Drew Pinsky said the combination of fentanyl, (which is an opioid based drug), and alprazolam (which is a benzodiazepine) could be the key to why Prince died.
“It is all too common for people to overdose if they are taking a combination of a benzodiazepine and an opioid,” Pinsky said. “This is what I’ve been warning was a likely possibility.”

Powerful painkiller

At the beginning of the investigation into Prince’s death, sources told CNN that painkillers were found inside his Paisley Park compound and they could not find a valid prescription for the medication. The Star Tribune now reports that their source said no prescription for fentanyl has been found in the months since Prince’s death. So, a burning question remains. How did Prince acquire the drug?
What you need to know about fentanyl
Fentanyl, the most powerful painkiller on the market, is normally prescribed to cancer patients in extreme pain. It’s also used to ease the pain of someone who is dying or as part of anesthesia during surgery.
But illegally manufactured fentanyl pills are readily available across America.
Why do so many pop stars die young?

 
Just last month, the Drug Enforcement Administration published a report saying counterfeit pills are fueling the fentanyl and heroin/opioid crisis in the United States, which has become an epidemic. The DEA issued a national health alert over the rise in fentanyl overdoses in 2015.
That year, the DEA said its National Forensic Laboratory Information System showed “there were approximately eight times as many fentanyl exhibits (confiscated drugs that tested positive for fentanyl) in 2015 as there were during the 2006 fentanyl crisis, clearly demonstrating the unprecedented threat and expansion of the fentanyl market.”
Feds seeking answers on how Prince got fentanyl, the opioid that killed him

 
Prince’s death at 57 years old shocked the world. For months fans mourned the musical genius by showing up by the hundreds to pay their respects. Many left purple mementos on the fence that surrounds the Paisley Park Compound where Prince died.
He was discovered dead inside of an elevator in the complex.

Dosage would have killed anyone

Officials never revealed the amount of fentanyl that was in Prince’s system. But the Star Tribune reported that a source said the amount of fentanyl in his system was so high it would have killed anyone, no matter their size.
Opioids and overdoses: 4 things to know

 
It has been four months since Prince died and the investigation into his death is still ongoing. The DEA began working the case alongside the Carver County Sheriff’s Office from the very early stages. But no one knows exactly why Prince was taking strong painkillers or how he obtained them.

Palliative care – revisited

Some of my readers seem to have the same mental concept as some of the legislators that pass many of the laws that are impaling many in the chronic pain community.

PALLIATIVE CARE is a process not a structure.

Yes palliative care is normally associated with cancer care and end of life Hospice, but it is not a process restricted to Hospice or caring for terminal or end of life pts.

Hospice is a structure that is regulated by – who else – the government.  Normally, when a person enters Hospice.. their doc will confirm (guess) that the pt has less than 6 months to live.  In the case of a pt on Medicare/Medicaid, they relinquish their Medicare/Medicaid and the Hospice organization gets paid – normally a per diem amount – to provide all the services that the pt needs for the balance of their life.

Their goal is to “comfort” both the pt and their family and make the pt comfortable and do nothing that will extend their life.. Again it is about saving money for the system… paying for heroic procedures that may add hours or days to the pt’s life.

If you read the WHO’s definition of palliative care in this post  what would happen if ?

It is about helping a pt and the family deal with the pt’s life threatening disease… be that diabetes, hypertension, heart failure… whatever disease that if not properly addressed could impact both the pt’s quality of life and life expectancy.

How many pts’ quality of life have been compromised by the reduction or elimination of their pain medication therapy ?  How many chronic pain pts have committed suicide because their medication was reduced or eliminated.

Is providing a pt with physical therapy, a cane, walker or wheelchair to improve the pt’s quality of life, part of  palliative care ?

what would happen if ?

I hear from pts .. nearly daily.. about their medications being pulled back, dropped altogether and/or discharged from a practice.  I read in a lot of state laws and CDC guidelines the word “PALLIATIVE” which is often aligned with the clause that exempts terminal/cancer pts from any limitations on their opiate/pain management therapy.

If you look to WHO (World Health Organization) as to their definition of Palliative care you get the following

WHO Definition of Palliative Care

Palliative care is an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families facing the problem associated with life-threatening illness, through the prevention and relief of suffering by means of early identification and impeccable assessment and treatment of pain and other problems, physical, psychosocial and spiritual. Palliative care:

http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/

  • provides relief from pain and other distressing symptoms;
  • affirms life and regards dying as a normal process;
  • intends neither to hasten or postpone death;
  • integrates the psychological and spiritual aspects of patient care;
  • offers a support system to help patients live as actively as possible until death;
  • offers a support system to help the family cope during the patients illness and in their own bereavement;
  • uses a team approach to address the needs of patients and their families, including bereavement counselling, if indicated;
  • will enhance quality of life, and may also positively influence the course of illness;
  • is applicable early in the course of illness, in conjunction with other therapies that are intended to prolong life, such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and includes those investigations needed to better understand and manage distressing clinical complications.

Palliative care seems to have a very broad definition and while normally associated with treating pts with cancer…there seems to be the potential to apply to pts with a large array of chronic disease states.

The CDC guidelines and/or any guidelines – while don’t carry the weight of law – they do bear the weight of creating a “standard of care”  and/or “best practices”.  To establish a MINIMUM OF CARE for pts but not to exclude care provided to the pt above and beyond the MINIMUM care.

It is common knowledge that chronic pain pts typically suffers from depression and anxiety and is at twice the risk of committing suicide.

A pt’s medical records is clinical proof of what has been tried and what has been successful.  When a prescriber start changing/reducing the pt’s medication therapy.. could that be considered a form of pt abandonment or a form of malpractice because they are deviating from what has been proven clinically successful for a particular pt.

Currently Barb’s pain management is – IMO – at a optimum level, but like everyone else… she/we are at risk of various changes that could impact that situation… PCP retiring, dying… the teaching hospital where her pain clinic is located could have a change in policies and procedures.

If her pain management is reduced.. it is obvious that her quality of life goes in the same direction… and to the same degree it has an impact on my quality of life..

There is a part of the law:

http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/limits-on-damages-for-loss-of-society-companionship–consortium.html

What is Loss of Companionship and Consortium?

Loss of companionship and consortium also called the loss of society, loss of conjugal fellowship, and loss of marital compatibility are all different names for the same thing. Essentially, these terms refer to the emotional sadness one goes through when an immediate family member (spouse or child) has been injured or killed. It can include the grief from the loss of sexual relations or the loss of the ability to have children. 

Under these circumstances… deviating away from therapy that has proven to optimize her quality of life… we could have a pt that is being placed at a higher risk of suicide and loss of companionship on my part..

Personally, I would have my attorney send the physician a certified letter that the palliative care provision of the law applies to Barb… that there is clinical evidence of what amount of medication that she needs to optimize her pain management and quality of life… so do anything less would constitute a failure to meet ‘best practices” and “standard of care”… a form of malpractice and pt abandonment … and if the prescriber’s actions/in-actions contributes to her committing suicide that I will file charges that he contributed to/assisted in causing her to take that action.

This could paint the prescriber into a corner … “CHECK MATE”… if he discharges her… then there is the issue of retaliation, pt abandonment and I am sure that a good attorney can think up a few other charges.

One has to ask, if a prescriber can be charged with the death of a pt that OD’s for prescribing opiates to them… why can’t they be charged equally if a pt – who the prescriber knew or should have known was at risk of  a deepening depression – if their medication was reduced or eliminated.

What I think would be quite interesting is the spouse suing the prescriber for lost of companionship because of their actions/in-actions.  This would probably only work if the pt’s pain management had been stable and went downhill because of reduction of pain management meds.

 

Professional moral responsibility to treat pain ?

I have started this presentation in the middle and you need to listen to about 7 minutes of it. The entire presentation is abt ONE HOUR and can be viewed in its entirety on www.youtube.com

 

LIFE Before Death Opium: Sinner or Saint

LIFE Before Death Opium: Sinner or Saint

 

Our healthcare system has evolved to a point where now they label many things as “PRE”… pre-hypertensive, pre-diabetic, pre-cancerous  each of us has a finite number of days, weeks, months years to be on this earth..  let’s admit it.. everything after BIRTH is PRE-DEATH !

When I was born.. my life expectancy was 65.. since I have passed that “bar”… my life expectancy is now in the late 70’s – early 80’s .. Every birthday that I manage to make.. my life expectancy extends somewhat.

Over those decades, I have become “dependent” on many things… food, drink, sleep, air.. and now certain medications that keep what medical science considers “normal ranges”  trying to extend my life expectancy and hopefully my quality of life.

We are seeing more and more of those suffering from subjective diseases …specially chronic pain … as their medications are being pulled back and or they are dropped all together.. if their “quantity of life”/life expectancy is worth much without a optimized quality of life that their medications use to provide them.

I have been told by friends, relatives and doctors of people who are suffering so from their untreated pain.. have exercised their final and only option to finally stop their torturous level of pain.  

Have those deaths been intentionally mis-classifed as “opiate related death” and not the real cause… basically hidden from view and/or swept under the rug. There seems to be little indignation by the relatives that their loved one was forced down that path.  Unlike those who have lost a loved one who OD’d because they suffered from addictive personality disorder and for whatever reason… their death spiral could not be stopped.

Only the chronic pain community and their relatives can stop this INSANITY that is centered in Washington DC and many state capitals. The solution is not as tragic as what some in untreated pain are having to do…  but is would be a sort of  SHARING YOUR PAIN

cryingeyevote

When GRIEF blinds the TRUTH ?

This is a “platform” of a anti-opiate group that consist mostly of family members who have lost a loved one to the mental health disease of addictive personality disorder and/or those groups who operate FOR-PROFIT substance abuse facilities. I am going to comment on this platform to show how – IMO – narrow minded, self serving and myopic their collective view point is.
call on our federal government to take the following actions:
1.Take all measures necessary to ensure that opioids and other controlled drugs are prescribed more cautiously.
The steps that the Fed/State have already taken has cause the prescribing of opiates peaked in 2012 while use/abuse of opiates and OD’s continue to climb.  The Feds (CDC) and a number of states have implemented “cookie cutter” guidelines… to foster treatment of pts with subjective diseases where there is no “medical yardstick test’ that can measure the intensity of how the disease is impacting the pt’s quality of life… only the pt can determine that.
2.FDA should take the following actions:
Prohibit marketing of opioids for conditions where risks outweigh benefits
Since all medications have some RISKS.. and some medications and all term benefits are not measurable .. think treating diabetes, hypertension, cholesterol and other diseases where quality of life and life expectancy itself cannot be determined in the short term.
Consult its advisory committee before approving  any new opioids.
To the best of my knowledge there are advisory committees involved with the approval of all new medications… although the FDA does not have to accept the recommendation of the committee to approve a new medication
Add an upper dose and a suggested duration of use on opioid labels.
Does this suggest that they don’t want chronic pain treated or if they are only interested in acute pain limitations.. why don’t they say so ?
Designate naloxone an over-the-counter drug.
Is making Naloxone an OTC medication… encouraging/condoning the abuse of opiates ? I predict that we will still have deaths because only a single dose of Naloxone will be on hand when there is a over dose .. when multiple doses will be needed to successfully revive a person who has OD’d
Ensure that abuse-deterrent opioid formulations are NOT marketed as less addictive.
What doctor would believe that abuse-deterrent opiate is less addictive… they are suppose to be able to be harder to abuse the medication via shooting up, snorting or other non-recommended administration routes.  BUT.. there is rumors out there that some have been able to circumvent the abuse deterrent in one or more opiates that include an abuse deterrent. Every time you try to make something idiot proof .. they build better idiots
3.DEA should mandate prescriber education, free of industry bias, for all registrants who intend to prescribe more than a 3-day supply of opioids.
Now they are suggesting that the DEA – a law enforcement agency – is to determine the content of prescriber education
4.HHS should immediately reduce barriers to buprenorphine treatment
They are endorsing replacing the ADDICTION to a C-II medications to the DEPENDENCY on a C-III medication. while there is an effective non-controlled medication – VIVITROL… that does not depend on the pt taking their medication daily but a shot every 28 days. If they don’t show up for their 28 day shot.. you know that they are probably going “off the reservation” as opposed to knowing/not knowing if a pt has taken their daily dose of buprenorphine and may be back on track to seriously abusing their favorite or most available substance.
5. Increase funding for evidence-based addiction treatment, especially in communities hit hardest by the epidemic.
Are they admitting that addiction is a TREATABLE DISEASE ? So are they trying to segregate pts with certain diseases that deserve treatment and others should not to be afforded treatment
6. CDC and SAMHSA should improve public health surveillance of opioid addiction and overdose deaths.
What stats can be believe from the CDC… there has been evidence that they count each drug in the toxicology of a OD as a “cause of death” … so one OD can cause stats of multiple death counts.  The CDC can’t even keep track of how many people die of the flu.. all they can give you is a probability RANGE of several tens of thousands deaths between the bottom and top of the range.
7. Incentivize states to mandate prescriber use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs
The PMP program is a concept developed in the late 20th century and we are using this antiquated concept/process trying to isolate 21st century criminals.  Congress passed the NASPER act http://nasper.org/  that would create a NATIONAL PMP program and was signed into law in 2005 … but .. Congress has never passed any funding for this program.  Our driver’s license system has been seriously compromised, so a determined substance abuser .. having multiple driver’s licenses… could doctor/pharmacy shop and never show up in the PMP. Right now, we have state level programs in 49 states ( Missouri has not passed a law) and maybe 45 states whose program is up and running. Some states have attempted to interconnect their PMP with other states’ PMP’s.
these anti-opiate groups fault the pharma’s for have a FOR PROFIT MOTIVE… yet this group and other groups are interwoven .. and financially supported by entities that are PROFIT DRIVEN…   Maybe this is way the use of Vivtrol is not being mentioned or endorsed .. because it may not help those entities generate as much revenue or profits.  Since a 28 day Vivitrol program could be handled by community healthcare providers.  Perhaps, when your goals are driven by grief of a loved one… you can be mislead by those who express empathy, but whose real motives are profit driven.  Sort of like “the pot calling the kettle black ” ?

Trading an addiction to an opiate.. for a dependency on a controlled medication ?

Is the use of medications like methadone and buprenorphine simply replacing one addiction with another?

https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/principles-drug-addiction-treatment-research-based-guide-third-edition/frequently-asked-questions/use-medications-methadone-buprenorphine

In treating substance abuse… are we trying to replace an ADDICTION to a C-II opiate by creating a DEPENDENCY on a C-III medication ? Is this an admission that substance abuse is NOT CURABLE… just TREATABLE… but still involves a controlled medication.. with – according to the DEA – still  has an abuse potential.. since it is a controlled (scheduled) medication.

No. Buprenorphine and methadone are prescribed or administered under monitored, controlled conditions and are safe and effective for treating opioid addiction when used as directed. They are administered orally or sublingually (i.e., under the tongue) in specified doses, and their effects differ from those of heroin and other abused opioids.

Heroin, for example, is often injected, snorted, or smoked, causing an almost immediate “rush,” or brief period of intense euphoria, that wears off quickly and ends in a “crash.” The individual then experiences an intense craving to use the drug again to stop the crash and reinstate the euphoria.

The cycle of euphoria, crash, and craving—sometimes repeated several times a day—is a hallmark of addiction and results in severe behavioral disruption. These characteristics result from heroin’s rapid onset and short duration of action in the brain.

As used in maintenance treatment, methadone and buprenorphine are not heroin/opioid substitutes.

In contrast, methadone and buprenorphine have gradual onsets of action and produce stable levels of the drug in the brain. As a result, patients maintained on these medications do not experience a rush, while they also markedly reduce their desire to use opioids.

If an individual treated with these medications tries to take an opioid such as heroin, the euphoric effects are usually dampened or suppressed. Patients undergoing maintenance treatment do not experience the physiological or behavioral abnormalities from rapid fluctuations in drug levels associated with heroin use. Maintenance treatments save lives—they help to stabilize individuals, allowing treatment of their medical, psychological, and other problems so they can contribute effectively as members of families and of society.

How effective is drug addiction treatment?

https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/principles-drug-addiction-treatment-research-based-guide-third-edition/frequently-asked-questions/how-effective-drug-addiction-treatment

In addition to stopping drug abuse, the goal of treatment is to return people to productive functioning in the family, workplace, and community. According to research that tracks individuals in treatment over extended periods, most people who get into and remain in treatment stop using drugs, decrease their criminal activity, and improve their occupational, social, and psychological functioning. For example, methadone treatment has been shown to increase participation in behavioral therapy and decrease both drug use and criminal behavior. However, individual treatment outcomes depend on the extent and nature of the patient’s problems, the appropriateness of treatment and related services used to address those problems, and the quality of interaction between the patient and his or her treatment providers.

Relapse rates for addiction resemble those of other chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and asthma.

Like other chronic diseases, addiction can be managed successfully. Treatment enables people to counteract addiction’s powerful disruptive effects on the brain and behavior and to regain control of their lives. The chronic nature of the disease means that relapsing to drug abuse is not only possible but also likely, with symptom recurrence rates similar to those for other well-characterized chronic medical illnesses—such as diabetes, hypertension, and asthma (see figure, “Comparison of Relapse Rates Between Drug Addiction and Other Chronic Illnesses”)—that also have both physiological and behavioral components.

Unfortunately, when relapse occurs many deem treatment a failure. This is not the case: Successful treatment for addiction typically requires continual evaluation and modification as appropriate, similar to the approach taken for other chronic diseases. For example, when a patient is receiving active treatment for hypertension and symptoms decrease, treatment is deemed successful, even though symptoms may recur when treatment is discontinued. For the addicted individual, lapses to drug abuse do not indicate failure—rather, they signify that treatment needs to be reinstated or adjusted, or that alternate treatment is needed (see figure, “Why is Addiction Treatment Evaluated Differently?”).

 

when going in the opposite direction could be the right thing to do ?

There is a anti-opiate group having a rally/protest in DC next month… The initial gut reaction by some in the chronic pain community is to show up and have a counter protest.

But this group is just patting all those in Congress and the bureaucracy to continue doing what they are doing… a counter protest could give them just that credibility and attention that they don’t deserve or would otherwise get.

Over the last decade, especially during this administration, the war on drugs has taken a definite change in direction, focused on pts, pharmacies/Pharmacists, drug wholesalers and prescribers.  Not really sure why the dramatic change.. Could it be in the same time that 25 states have decriminalize/legalize MJ/MMJ in that time frame and the DEA could stand to loose all states as more have it on the ballot this fall… that means that the DEA stands the possibility of losing a lot of funding unless they find another reason to keep their funding.  Could it also be part of this administration’s promise to fundamentally change America.

Congress creates laws and fund governmental agencies via the Federal budget process.  Congress also has the ability – although seldom uses it – the ability to revoke/rescind existing laws that are no longer appropriate.

They can even pass new laws – which they do 300-400 times a year – that are in conflict with existing laws on the books and/or makes existing laws on the books unconstitutional.

Congress works on a “seniority system” .. the old guard/establishment dictates the entire process.  As has been proven over the time, nothing has changed for the positive in the chronic pain community. Congress has turned a deft ear/blind eye to the medical needs of about 1/3 of our population.

In fact, they have seeming done things that are harming/killing and/or causing people to commit suicide because of the Federal agencies’ activities.

Is it time for the chronic community to SPEAK UP… and do it at the voting booth.  We don’t know what visible or invisible groups have the ear of those in Congress and to date have seemingly been successful in influencing the direction of the war on drugs/pts.  Lobbyists spend NINE MILLION/DAY trying to influence Congress… THREE BILLION + /yr.  They are not spending that kind of money… without getting the results that they want.

The chronic pain community’s votes could have MORE VALUE than all those BILLIONS that are being spent to influence Congress. How much is your health worth ?

cryingeyevote

If I was going to have a rally/protest in DC.. when would I NOT DO IT ?

Image result for cartoon what were they thinking

 

 

 

 

 

 

fedup

 

FED UP! Rally 2016

FED UP! Coalition to End the Opioid Epidemic

Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 1:00 PM

http://www.house.gov/legislative/

Here is their platform   http://feduprally.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/2016-Fed-Up-platform_final.pdf

They have scheduled their RALLY for a SUNDAY… guess how many governmental bureaucrats are working on a SUNDAY ?

Also above is the House and Senate calendars.. the House  calendar… all 435 House members from Sept 16-19 will be back in their district

According to the Senate calendar… Senate is out of session for the weekend and will be in session for only two weeks – the last two weeks in Sept and then they are IN RECESS until after the Nov 8th election..  There are 34 Senators up for re-election … so when the Senate comes back to work for a total of EIGHT DAYS in Nov and another TWELVE DAYS in Dec… only 64 Senators know that they will be in office for the next Congressional session starting in Jan 2017.  Of course the Senate is only going to be in session for 24 days in the LAST THREE MONTHS OF THE YEAR.

Everyone should realize that a Presidential election only comes around every 4 yrs and there aren’t that many times that we don’t have a sitting President running for re-election…  like this election.

FED-UP and the rest of the anti-opiate groups should be aware that addiction is a mental health disease and the best way to stop addiction is to do genetic testing on people.. those who have “defective genes” that causes mental health/addiction maybe we should keep them from reproducing.  Mental health in our society would be greatly reduced and/or eliminated… and addiction would disappear as well…

Just think of all the healthcare dollars that could save on treating mental health and addiction… and then we wouldn’t have to worry about treating those who suffer from chronic pain with opiates ?

90% dosage reduction of opiates – NO BIG DEAL ?

stevemailbox90% dosage reduction of opiates – NO BIG DEAL ?

Hello Steve I am writing you today because my mothers doctor just left her didn’t give here any federal doctors to go to. Now this doctor has had my mother on 30 mg oxycodone 3 times a day as needed. My mothers is legitamitley disabled recieves social security for her disability which is a very difficult nuerological disease similar to Lupos & Ms but in its own leagues. Anyhow her new doctors will not give her her medicine she was receiving 120 30 mg oxycodone a month for the past &a half years ! & now this new doctor wants gave her a 30 5mg prescription to last her the month .... ! I ?  I’m enraged watching my mother in which has to be pain pill withdrawal because I’ve never seen her like this before my question to you sir is … Is she eligible for a ADA Complaint case ?

So this pt goes from 90 mgs/day to one tablet/dose of 5 mg that would last her 2-4 hrs… and she is suppose to get her “8 hrs sleep” so that her body can attempt to “restore itself” … however much that is possible under her co-morbidity issues.

Under our legal system our President is the final authority if certain laws are enforced or not enforced or who they are enforced upon…

Here is a recent example of who our ADA laws are being enforced

Discriminating against pain…. OK ??? …but if you have HIV… good to go ??

Pain clinic was fined $30,000 for denial of care… civil rights violation/discrimination under the Americans with Disability Act.. not because this pt was covered under the ADA because of their disabling pain.. BUT.. because the pt was HIV +.

Just remember … the Congress that passed The Harrison Narcotic Act was Democratic controlled

the Congress that passed The Controlled Substance Act 1970 was Democratic controlled

During the last 8 yrs… Congress has been controlled at times, by both parties… and the war on drugs have taken a turn toward a war on pts…

IMO.. a very good reason to:

cryingeyevote

 

 

 

 

 

SHARE YOUR PAIN !!!