Nip it in the bud ?

Image result for cartoon barney nip in the budHow foes quickly stymied a Texas bill restricting painkillers

http://www.statesman.com/news/lifestyles/medical/how-foes-quickly-stymied-a-texas-bill-restricting-/nsZSc/

This is a good example if voters/constituents start voicing against some proposed bill/law before it gains traction.  This is another good example why DEA chose the time frame it did to reschedule Kratom… no incumbent President running for reelection.. it is after Labor Day when all of Congress is focused on getting reelected and the DEA elected to have an EMERGENCY RULE CHANGE .. to avoid the public comment period.  EMERGENCY RULE CHANGE on a herbal substance that has been used for centuries and the poison control center has had 600 phone calls over FIVE YEARS.. and claim there has been a TOTAL OF 30 DEATHS reported WORLD WIDE… about the same number of kids/baby that die from being accidentally left in a closed/hot car – EVERY YEAR IN THE USA.  Unlike trying to UNWIND something like the CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ACT that has been on the books for 46 YEARS and there is a substantial bureaucratic infrastructure in place with tens or hundreds of thousands of jobs depending on the continuation … and .. you are going to get a lot of push back… by all those bureaucrats whose jobs will be put risk.

State Rep. Giovanni Capriglione wanted to do something about pill mills.

The Southlake Republican had heard about phony pain management clinics dispensing opioids to people who didn’t medically need them, knew it cost the state money to deal with the problem and sympathized with people hooked on these drugs. So he decided to tackle the issue through legislation.

In March 2015, several months after the last legislative session had begun, Capriglione filed a bill that would have banned pharmacies from dispensing more than 10 days worth of opioid painkillers in a 60-day period unless a doctor filled out a form granting the patient an exemption. Pill mill doctors would never fill out those forms, Capriglione figured, and that would separate the good physicians from the bad.

How foes quickly stymied a Texas bill restricting painkillers photo

Deborah Cannon

“I filed the bill, and it was about 10 minutes before I started getting some push-back,” Capriglione said.

Individual doctors, pharmacists and about a half-dozen pharmaceutical companies quickly contacted him to register their complaints, saying the requirement was just more red tape that would cause them more work, he said. Capriglione said he couldn’t remember who approached him since it was more than 18 months ago.

Instead, he remembers them saying, the state should focus on improving a Texas database designed to identify physicians who overprescribe opioids and patients who doctor-shop to get them.

At the time, responsibility for keeping that database was being moved from Department of Public Safety to the state pharmacy board.

Capriglione, who said he was surprised by the strong response, backed off. He says he wasn’t intimated by the lobbyists, but he hadn’t anticipated the blowback and wasn’t prepared to fight back so late in the session.

“It didn’t affect me at all,” he said. “It’s clear what their intent was.”

So he agreed to let the database changes play out. Capriglione says he plans to check in with the pharmacy board this fall to see what effect, if any, the database has had in curbing the problem.

“If it’s working, fine,” he said. “If it’s not, if I don’t see some actual evidence … then I may consider refiling the bill.”

Records show that Capriglione, first elected in 2012, has received a total of $5,000 in campaign contributions from the Pain Care Forum.

Pain Care Forum in Texas

Top 10 recipients of contributions from members of the Pain Care Forum, which includes Pfizer, Merck and allied companies:

U.S. Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Lewisville: $292,000

U.S. Rep. Joe Barton, R-Ennis: $210,000

U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas: $203,750

U.S. Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Dallas: $197,250

U.S. Rep. Kevin Brady, R-The Woodlands: $184,250

U.S. Rep. Gene Green, D-Houston: $147,200

U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Laredo: $85,900

U.S. Rep. Sam Johnson, R-Plano: $84,250

Gov. Greg Abbott, R: $75,500

Sen. Jane Nelson, R-Flower Mound: $74,500

Politics of Pain: Texas report

  • From 2006 to 2015, Texas leaders received $4.4 million in campaign contributions from the Pain Care Forum, a national coalition of advocacy groups and pharmaceutical companies, such as Merck or Pfizer, that meets monthly to discuss opioid-related issues.
  • In 2015, Texas had 63 lobbyists representing members of the Pain Care Forum.
  • Legislative efforts to battle the opioid abuse problem in Texas met with mixed results in 2015. A bill allowing pharmacists to prescribe the anti-overdose drug Naloxone passed. A bill that gave some legal protection to drug users seeking medical help for an overdose victim was vetoed.
  • According to a 2014 interim report by the Texas House Committee on Public Health, the mortality rate for overdoses in Texas between the years 1999 and 2010 increased by 78 percent.
  • That same report states that Texas ranks 44th in the nation for drug overdose death rates in the nation and 33rd for highest opioid pain relief prescribing rates.
  • Because of reporting issues — death certificates don’t always reveal the drugs involved in overdoses — it is impossible to know exactly how many people in Texas are dying from opioids. In 2013, for example, 622 deaths reported across Texas were blamed on opioids — mostly painkillers, based on death certificate data. But 798 prescription drug-related deaths were recorded by local medical examiners that year in just 17 of the state’s 254 counties, a joint investigation between the American-Statesman and the Houston Chronicle found.

St. Louis on pace to beat 10 year heroin death record

St. Louis on pace to beat 10 year heroin death record

ST. LOUIS (KTVI) – Despite years of stories about the horrors of heroin, the City of St. Louis is on pace to see the highest heroin overdose death total in a decade.

The DEA warned in April that agents were seeing the deadliest strain yet, hitting the streets back. It did not stop people from buying heroin and we saw a spike in deaths.

St. Louis police have reported finding much of the heroin mixed with fentanyl, which is a synthetic opioid intended for cancer patients.

DEA Special Agent in Charge James Shroba warned on April 8 that his agents were seeing drug traffickers tweaking the chemical compound of fentanyl.

“Hundreds—if not thousands—of times more potent than heroin or other opioids; this will, there will certainly be tragic consequences with these,” Shroba said.

Right after he said that, St. Louis had its worst month this year, with 24 accidental heroin deaths. So far this the year, the total number of heroin overdose deaths has reached 121. The city saw 136 heroin overdose deaths in 2015.

Meanwhile, St. Louis County has already equaled last year’s total, with 26 overdose deaths to date.

As an example of how deadly fentanyl can be, the DEA said an amount the size of a sugar packet could contain one thousand fatal doses.

The best politicians/laws that money can buy ?

Lawyers: The unelected legislators of our rights

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/the-judiciary/296437-lawyers-the-unelected-legislators-of-our-rights

 

Millions of people in the United States believe that our systems of government and justice are rigged, and they are right. What most people may not realize, however, is that their individual rights — rights supposedly protected by the Constitution of the United States – are being taken away by the very institution sworn to uphold those rights.

Our elected representatives rely on huge sums of money to be elected and then re-elected. Without a steady stream of campaign funds, they have little to no hope of holding their seats. Most of this money is provided by large corporations, through their contributions to political action committees.

This system leaves all our representatives, congressmen, senators, and even the president, beholden to the large corporations — the very corporations they are supposed to regulate. It is also important to be understanding FINRA arbitration to know how to resolve the security related disputes.

The loser in this equation is the average American. Congress no longer fights for consumers and average people the way it is supposed to. We have to look no further than the overall approval rating for both parties, which hovers around 18%. You don’t have to be a math whiz to figure out that this means that a whopping 82% of Americans don’t approve of the job being done by the very representatives that we elected.

So who are the ones fighting every day to keep the corporations from smashing the rest into the ground and running roughshod over the very people who elected them?

Trial lawyers. Yes, trial lawyers. The trial lawyers, who the Chamber of Commerce, the attack dog for the large corporations, spends millions of dollars to attack and belittle.

Large corporations are using corporate money to take away many of our rights. The most important right that is being taken away is the right for a jury of our peers to decide civil trials, because corporations have pushed disputes from the courts into arbitration.

Consider that in 2015, the Supreme Court ruled that AT&T could not be sued for  allegedly misleading customers by promising unlimited data that could slow down if you used 3GB or more in a given month. Why?

Because affected subscribers all signed contracts allowing AT&T to send disputes to individual arbitration. In other words, your right to a class action or trial by jury was, in essence, contracted away – buried in the fine print of a massive contract. Most consumers are likely not even aware that they’ve given up this right. Without class action and the right to trial, a company can cheat millions of people out of two dollars a month.

On the surface, arbitration might sound like a good idea. It lessens the workload of the courts and judges and lightens up the docket. However, when a judge hears your case in front of a jury of your peers, you don’t have to pay that judge’s bill at the end of the trial. His or her salary is already paid.

In arbitration, you not only have to pay the hourly rate of an arbiter, you likely have to pay the hourly rate of three arbiters. And they will most likely be chosen by the corporation you are suing! The cost of a one-week arbitration can easily cost tens of thousands of dollars, all of which YOU are liable to pay!  

Or how about those of us who take pharmaceutical drugs?  Most people are not aware that (1) your insurance company can refuse to allow you a name-brand pharmaceutical and can force you to take a generic; and (2) if the generic medication causes you severe harm, you have no legal recourse because the Supreme Court of the United States has determined that a generic drug manufacturer is immune from any lawsuit for damages caused the by the drug.

Once again, giant pharmaceutical corporations make millions of dollars of donations to a political candidate, and then receive favorable rulings from our nation’s highest court, effectively shutting down your legal rights under the Constitution – and most likely shuts them down without your knowledge. [See, Mutual Pharmaceutical Co v. Karen Bartlett, 570 U.S. __ (2013); Pliva v. Mensing, 564 U.S. __ (2011)] 

Article VII of the Constitution of the United States guarantees all American citizens the right to a trial by jury. “In Suits at common law where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States than according to the rules of the common law.”

This Constitutional right should remain sacred in our justice system, and should not, under any circumstances, be for sale. All cases should be decided using the rules of law and the rules of evidence — by you, your neighbors and your fellow citizens.

If you have a cell phone, if you rent a car, if you have health insurance, or even auto insurance, and you’ve signed the lengthy, hard-to-read, hard-to-understand contract that accompanies these items, chances are you have given up your Constitutional right to a trial by a jury of your peers, and have unwittingly agreed to binding arbitration for any potential legal claim.   

Do you know where your elected representatives stand on the issue of mandatory arbitration, or on protecting your Constitutional rights?  If not, you need to find out. Congressmen and senators will almost uniformly support it — even though their job is to support YOU! They have been told by the corporations that fund them that arbitration will eliminate frivolous lawsuits, keep the courts unclogged, and prevent needless legal fees. But what it really does is eliminate your Constitutional rights.

The only thing standing between you and corporations bulldozing your rights are trial lawyers. We fight every day to keep the wealthy and the giant corporations from rigging the system beyond repair. Take a moment to find out your elected officials’ positions on these very important issues, and vote accordingly!  

Mike Burg is the founding shareholder in the law firm Burg Simpson Eldredge Hersh Jardine PC, of which former Senator Alan K. Simpson is a partner. He has tried over 185 cases, and his clients have received settlements, judgments, and verdicts in excess of $500 million. Mr. Burg is the author of Trial By Fire: One Man’s Battle to End Corporate Greed and Save Lives. He can be reached via email at gclement@burgsimpson.com.

cryingeyevote

 

Moving the needle ?

movedtheneedle

There are few American left alive from when the seeds of the war on drugs was started with The Harrison Narcotic Act 1914

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Narcotics_Tax_Act

Whether it makes a difference or not, the Democrats were in the majority in both houses of Congress and Woodrow Wilson (D) signed it into law.  The driving force behind the law was racism and bigotry.   Three years later our “all knowing” court system ruled that being a opiate addict was a CRIME and no longer a disease. This was the turning point for prescribers to treat/maintain addicts… it became illegal and prescribers were threatened with prison for doing so.  This is where our bureaucracy created the “black drug market” to satisfy a certain per-cent of our population  demand for opiates

Several decades passed before the bureaucrats decided to “up their game”. Many of us have watched since the Controlled Substance Act was signed into law in 1970… the “screws” keep getting tightened on those who have a valid medical necessity for taking controlled substances.  Once again it was a Democratic controlled Congress that passed this law, which was signed into law by Pres Nixon (R)

Every succeeding administration and Congress seems to have put their own “additional touches” and/or allowed the DEA to have their “own head” in determining what, how, when they did what they wanted to do… reinterpreting the 1970 law to meet the agency’s agenda on any particular day.

It may be just a coincidence, but under the current administration, it would seem that the original war on drugs has turned into a war on pt and healthcare providers. Whipped up into almost a frenzy.

Some believe that writing to your congressional representative will get their attention, but how many have received letters from different members of Congress that have nearly identical paragraphs ?

Years ago, I received a reply to a letter to my Federal Senator.. first first was agreeing with me being in favor of the issue I had sent a letter about and the next day I received a letter from the same office agreeing with me being AGAINST the issue I had sent the original letter about.  This was not from a novice Senator, but one who had been in office for a couple of terms.  At that point is when I became very skeptical/cynical of our bureaucratic system.

Over the years, I have went to DC on numerous occasions with organized legislative days with different national associations that I have belonged to, as well as organized legislative days at the state level.   I have even went as far as meeting with my Federal Representative in a one to one meeting when they are back in their district.

Time and again, they all sound emphatic and understanding, but even following up with their Legislative Assistants (LA)… things tend to “drop off the edge”  and communication ceases.

Let’s face it… the only things that the members of Congress are concerned about is votes and getting donations to their re-election fund.  Lobbyists spend NINE MILLION/day – 7 days a week on Congress… that is abt $17,000.00 per member of Congress PER DAY.  Some claim that businesses that hire lobbyists get back $10 for every dollar invested in lobbying Congress.

DC is not the center of power to try and influence members of Congress.. members of Congress are back in their district several times a year… willing to make appts for a one to one meeting and/or having scheduled community meetings where they can be reached and a constituent can express their concerns.

There was a survey posted on one of the on line chronic pain newsletter that stated that 90% of the families with a chronic pain pts… were struggling financially because one spouse could not work and/or the cost of therapy puts a strain on the family’s finances.

This would suggest that trying to get chronic painers to come to a organized event some distance from the home, is probably futile because of the typical family’s poor financial status.

The chronic pain community’s most viable option is their ability to control who gets into office….by using their voting power… last presidential election.. there was 126 total votes cast… 5 million separated winner from loser.

How some of those from the “Republican establishment” have reacted to the nomination of Trump is very telling… unless one of “the establishment” gets nominated… they are not going to support the party that they are suppose to belong to… so it would appear that a member of the establishment getting into office  is all that is important… doesn’t matter which party they belong to… because they can only be in office for 4 to 8 yrs max.

Many forget that Congress operates on a seniority basis.. unless the entire seniority structure gets tossed out… there are enough in the middle of the seniority structure has been around long enough to have been indoctrinated in how “things are suppose to happen” and will pick up the baton and it will be back to business as usual.

Chronic painers don’t have to travel or incur any expenses to MAKE A DIFFERENCE… register to vote by mail and vote by mail… unless the chronic painer can’t afford a couple of stamps.. there is really no excuse … not to vote….

99% of those in Congress who run for reelection .. historically suggests that they will get reelected… causing a total disruption of this assured reelection will grant the chronic pain community POWER AND INFLUENCE.

We are trying to undo something that has 100+ yrs in its creation..  “flash in the pan” demonstrations/rally will DO NOTHING… the chronic pain community has to act like a SNIPER..  take ONE SHOT and TAKE THEM OUT !

cryingeyevote

the country has no system in place to track the tens of thousands of deaths that occur each year

This Should Superbug You

https://www.propublica.org/article/srsly-this-should-superbug-you

A new Reuters investigation shows that 15 years after drug-resistant infections were declared a “grave threat,” the situation is far worse, and the country has no system in place to track the tens of thousands of deaths that occur each year.

TENS OF THOUSANDS OF PREVENTABLE DEATHS each year…  Nothing NEWSWORTHY here… just move along… no where near a EPIDEMIC LEVEL …. not like the total of  30 WORLD WIDE DEATHS from KRATOM…

You have the flu. You also have an important deadline coming up, and the slave-driving editor at the non-profit investigative newsroom where you work is breathing down your butterfly collar. You have to get it together, or risk your editor trying to write much more incoherent things into your story to get it done in time. To make the deadline, you pop some penicillin … Ok, joke’s on you, because the flu is a virus, not a bacterial infection, and you just took an antibiotic. (Don’t do that.) But let’s say you had an infection, so you take an antibiotic to get back to work. While you’re convalescing, evolution is happening. A few of the microbes the antibiotic are attacking happen to have some gene mutation that allows them to survive the attack. The surviving enemy microbes spawn a new population, all of which have the gene mutation for laughing in the face of your puny antibiotic. Now multiply that scenario by millions of people taking antibiotics when they probably don’t really need them, and you begin to understand how we’ve created “superbug” infections via the overuse of antibiotics. A new Reuters investigation shows that 15 years after drug-resistant infections were declared a “grave threat,” the situation is far worse, and the country has no system in place to track the tens of thousands of deaths that occur each year. (Editors, however, manage to track exactly how long I, I mean you, procrastinate.) Your five Ws:

What is the death toll?

  Great question. Wish someone had an answer. While every state tracks AIDS-related deaths, Reuters reports that only about half track deaths related to antibiotic-resistant infections, and those that do generally track only a few different types of infections. In a survey, the tracking states reported about 3,300 deaths from resistant infections between 2003 and 2014. Meanwhile, Reuters found a slightly higher number recorded on death certificates during that period: 180,000. So close! The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that around 23,000 people die each year from 17 of the most common antibiotic-resistant infections, but, Reuters says, that number is “mostly guesswork.” Ya know, give or take a few tens-of-thousands of deaths. I think this is one of those situations for the ironic use of the phrase, “close enough for government work.”

What else?

The words that CDC officials used with Reuters to describe the agency’s death toll estimate are truly confidence inspiring: “jerry rig,” “ballpark figure,” “a searchlight in the dark attempt;” and, my personal favorite because I love 19th Century art, from Michael Craig, the CDC’s senior adviser for antibiotic resistance coordination and strategy, “an impressionist painting rather than something that is much more technical.” Excuse you, Mike, do you know how much technical skill it took to create Waterloo Bridge, Effect of Fog? … Art before science, I bet Mr. Craig was a star pupil in Miss Jean Brodie’s class.

Why?

… are drug-resistant infections often left off of death certificates? According to Reuters: a) Doctors frequently aren’t well-trained in filling out the appropriate forms – or in the importance of doing so – and often don’t wait the few days it would take after a patient passes away for a lab to confirm the infection. b) “Counting deaths is tantamount to documenting your own failures,” exposing a doctor and hospital to risk of legal action and loss of insurance reimbursement.

What can be done?

When bacteria becomes resistant, you have to develop a new drug. That’s why people are dying, until you develop something new, you’re screwed. Right now, doctors typically bombard patients with different existing antibiotics hoping one will blast out the bug – and worrying about when none will.

What is the bright side?

Well, at least the FDA just banned from over-the-counter soaps ingredients that cause bacterial resistance. Antibacterial soap-makers could not provide data to show that any of 19 ingredients they were using were safe and effective.


 

FDA Rejects Eliquis Antidote

FDA Rejects Eliquis Antidote

If you start bleeding when using one of the new NOAC (New Oral Anti-cogulants)..  Isn’t it reassuring that if you start to HEMORRHAGE… 79% of the pts will get excellent/good blood clotting within TWELVE HOURS.. Maybe the other 21% JUST BLEEDS TO DEATH ?

Warfarin has always been the gold standard for venous thromboembolism treatment and stroke/systemic embolism prophylaxis in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. In the past few years, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) like edoxaban (Savaysa), apixaban (Eliquis), rivaroxaban (Xarelto), and dabigatran (Pradaxa) have emerged as alternative treatment because of their favorable pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and minimal adverse events.
 
Vitamin K has been the antidote for warfarin for a long time, but the only available antidote for the NOAC class is idarucizumab (Praxbind) for Pradaxa. The lack of other antidotes within the class is worrisome because uncontrollable bleeding can be fatal.
 
Interim results of the ongoing Phase 3b/4 ANNEXA-4 study demonstrated AndexXa rapidly reversed anticoagulant effects of factor Xa inhibitors, with 79% of patients achieving excellent or good hemostasis over 12 hours. However, the FDA rejected AndexXa and is requiring manufacturer Portola Pharmaceuticals to provide additional information to support the inclusion of 2 other drugs in the antidote’s label: edoxaban and enoxaparin. Portola plans on resubmitting its application by the end of 2016. – See more at: http://www.pharmacytimes.com/contributor/charles-ng-pharmd-mba-candidate-2017/2016/09/5-things-happening-in-the-pharmacy-world-today#sthash.98Q1Dm0Z.dpuf

White House Manual Details How to Deal With Protesters

White House Manual Details How to Deal With Protesters

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/21/AR2007082101662.html

Not that they’re worried or anything. But the White House evidently leaves little to chance when it comes to protests within eyesight of the president. As in, it doesn’t want any.

A White House manual that came to light recently gives presidential advance staffers extensive instructions in the art of “deterring potential protestors” from President Bush’s public appearances around the country.

Among other things, any event must be open only to those with tickets tightly controlled by organizers. Those entering must be screened in case they are hiding secret signs. Any anti-Bush demonstrators who manage to get in anyway should be shouted down by “rally squads” stationed in strategic locations. And if that does not work, they should be thrown out.

But that does not mean the White House is against dissent — just so long as the president does not see it. In fact, the manual outlines a specific system for those who disagree with the president to voice their views. It directs the White House advance staff to ask local police “to designate a protest area where demonstrators can be placed, preferably not in the view of the event site or motorcade route.”

The “Presidential Advance Manual,” dated October 2002 with the stamp “Sensitive — Do Not Copy,” was released under subpoena to the American Civil Liberties Union as part of a lawsuit filed on behalf of two people arrested for refusing to cover their anti-Bush T-shirts at a Fourth of July speech at the West Virginia State Capitol in 2004. The techniques described have become familiar over the 6 1/2 years of Bush’s presidency, but the manual makes it clear how organized the anti-protest policy really is.

The lawsuit was filed by Jeffery and Nicole Rank, who attended the Charleston event wearing shirts with the word “Bush” crossed out on the front; the back of his shirt said “Regime Change Starts at Home,” while hers said “Love America, Hate Bush.” Members of the White House event staff told them to cover their shirts or leave, according to the lawsuit. They refused and were arrested, handcuffed and briefly jailed before local authorities dropped the charges and apologized. The federal government settled the First Amendment case last week for $80,000, but with no admission of wrongdoing.

The manual demonstrates “that the White House has a policy of excluding and/or attempting to squelch dissenting viewpoints from presidential events,” said ACLU lawyer Jonathan Miller. “Individuals should have the right to express their opinion to the president, even if it’s not a favorable one.”

White House spokesman Tony Fratto said that he could not discuss the manual because it is an issue in two other lawsuits.

The manual offers advance staffers and volunteers who help set up presidential events guidelines for assembling crowds. Those invited into a VIP section on or near the stage, for instance, must be ” extremely supportive of the Administration,” it says. While the Secret Service screens audiences only for possible threats, the manual says, volunteers should examine people before they reach security checkpoints and look out for signs. Make sure to look for “folded cloth signs,” it advises.

To counter any demonstrators who do get in, advance teams are told to create “rally squads” of volunteers with large hand-held signs, placards or banners with “favorable messages.” Squads should be placed in strategic locations and “at least one squad should be ‘roaming’ throughout the perimeter of the event to look for potential problems,” the manual says.

“These squads should be instructed always to look for demonstrators,” it says. “The rally squad’s task is to use their signs and banners as shields between the demonstrators and the main press platform. If the demonstrators are yelling, rally squads can begin and lead supportive chants to drown out the protestors (USA!, USA!, USA!). As a last resort, security should remove the demonstrators from the event site.”

Advance teams are advised not to worry if protesters are not visible to the president or cameras: “If it is determined that the media will not see or hear them and that they pose no potential disruption to the event, they can be ignored. On the other hand, if the group is carrying signs, trying to shout down the President, or has the potential to cause some greater disruption to the event, action needs to be taken immediately to minimize the demonstrator’s effect.”

The manual adds in bold type: “Remember — avoid physical contact with demonstrators! Most often, the demonstrators want a physical confrontation. Do not fall into their trap!” And it suggests that advance staff should “decide if the solution would cause more negative publicity than if the demonstrators were simply left alone.”

The staff at the West Virginia event may have missed that line.

Former Speaker of the House (John Boehner) is a NICOTINE ADDICT ?

Camel Smoker John Boehner’s New Job: Tobacco Lobbyist

Former House Speaker joins tobacco company board of directors

http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pulmonology/Smoking/60264

Former House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) is one of two new board members for the tobacco giant Reynolds American (RAI), the company announced Thursday.

In a press statement, Thomas C. Wajnert, who chairs Reynolds’ board of directors noted that move comes “as RAI gains momentum in its strategy to transform the tobacco industry.”

The appointment comes just days after an African American health group made a public appeal to President Obama to move on a long-stalled ban on menthol cigarettes, charging that tobacco companies have effectively targeted black youth and communities with menthol-flavored products.

Reynolds’ markets Newport, which is America’s top selling menthol cigarette brand. The company also makes Camel, which is the brand the heavy-smoking Boehner reportedly favors.

Boehner, who left Congress last year, will serve on the RAI board’s corporate governance, nominating and sustainability committee.

A spokesman for Boehner told The Wall Street Journal Thursday that the former House Speaker looks forward to helping RAI achieve its objective of “speeding the decline in tobacco use among young people and reducing the harm caused by smoking.”

In a strongly worded statement, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids’ president Matthew L. Myers rejected that claim saying, “It is truly absurd that tobacco giant Reynolds American and former House Speaker John Boehner, who was elected to Reynolds’ board of directors today, would express a commitment to “speeding the decline in tobacco use among young people,”Myers said. “Their records show the exact opposite. Reynolds’ announcement pairs the tobacco company with the most egregious record of marketing to kids and a politician with a long record of fighting policies to reduce youth tobacco use.”

Myers noted that in the same week Boehner was appointed to the RAI board, The Wall Street Journal published a story highlighting efforts by the company to market Newport cigarettes to young people with coupons for cigarettes at just $1 per pack and “Newport Pleasure Lounges” at music festivals.

Myers said RAI and other tobacco companies are also spending millions to fight ballot initiatives to significantly increase cigarette taxes in California, Colorado, and North Dakota.

“Reynolds, Altria/Philip Morris and other tobacco companies have already spent about $60 million to run deceptive ads against these initiatives,” he said. “Reynolds is opposing these initiatives for the very same reason it is offering cheap Newports: It knows that increasing the price of cigarettes is one of the most effective ways to reduce smoking, especially among kids.”

On Tuesday, the black advocacy group African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council (AATCLC) held a press conference in Washington D.C. asking the Obama Administration to act to ban menthol cigarettes from the market. The NAACP, which had long opposed such a ban, also recently voted to support efforts to restrict the sale of menthol cigarettes.

In an interview with MedPage Today, AATCLC co-chairman Phillip Gardiner, DrPH, said tobacco companies have historically provided economic support to groups like the NAACP and the National Urban League to essentially buy their silence.

“Things have changed some in the last few years, but, unfortunately since Day 1 the tobacco industry has invested heavily in African American civic, religious, sports and political organizations,” he said.

The LONGEST WHITE HOUSE PROTEST – 32 YEARS AND COUNTING.. EFFECTIVENESS ??

Connie Picciotto has kept vigil near the White House for 32 years. Why, and at what cost?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/feature/wp/2013/05/02/connie-picciotto-has-kept-vigil-near-the-white-house-for-32-years-why-and-at-what-cost/

Connie Picciotto, who has maintained a protest vigil in front of the White House since the early 1980s, seen from inside her shelter (a sheet of plastic draped over a patio umbrella and secured with binder clips) in March. (By Bill O’Leary)

The little old woman with the wig glued to her helmet is talking to three men in suits about war.

It’s sweltering in the August sunshine, and everything about these men — their designer sunglasses, unsheathed BlackBerrys, stiff postures — conveys a desire to escape the conversation. The woman keeps talking.

Connie stands near one of her signs. (Bill O’Leary)

“This is very important,” she is saying, her voice an emphatic falsetto. “We’ve got to stop Iran.”

She turns abruptly and shuffles back to her encampment, an old patio umbrella draped in a white plastic sheet secured with binder clips. It is flanked by two large boards with messages in capital letters: BAN ALL NUCLEAR WEAPONS OR HAVE A NICE DOOMSDAY and LIVE BY THE BOMB, DIE BY THE BOMB.

This rudimentary shelter has been positioned outside the White House for more than three decades. It is a monument itself now, widely considered the longest-running act of political protest in the United States, and this woman, Concepcion Picciotto — Connie, as she’s known to many — is its longest-running caretaker.

“I’ve seen her here for many years,” one of the men says quietly.

Connie returns and presses a booklet into his hand. “The Untold Story,” the title reads.

“This is important,” she says again.

“All right, thank you, ma’am,” the man says. He slips the pamphlet into his suit pocket. Within minutes, he deposits it in a trash can at the perimeter of Lafayette Square.

Connie is little, not quite 5 feet tall. She has the face of a woman who has lived on the street; her skin browned and scarred; her mouth a hard line, revealing only a few teeth when she speaks or smiles. When she first joined the vigil at the park, President Ronald Reagan had just taken his oath of office. Connie remained outside the White House gates throughout his presidency and the presidencies of those who followed: George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama.

She was here day after day, season after season — through the Iran-contra scandal and the Monica Lewinsky scandal and too many other scandals to list. She was here when the Persian Gulf War began and ended. Connie was here when American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, here when the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan started and went on and on.

Tour guides point out the vigil to visitors. Educators use it in lessons about social activism. It has appeared in Michael Moore’s controversial 2004 film “Fahrenheit 9/11,” a slew of local newspaper stories, a documentary titled “The Oracles of Pennsylvania Avenue.”

But despite its legendary past, the vigil faces an uncertain future. Connie is 77. Her health has suffered since she was hit by a cab weeks ago, and the activist-run house that has been her shelter when she’s not in the park is endangered. Still, she remains focused on her priority: being heard. In these final months of the 2012 campaign cycle, she hopes that Obama might be the first president to meet her and learn her story.

Meanwhile, a young, dark-haired man stops in front of the tent, aiming a digital camera at one of the signs. Connie leans forward and calls hello. She’ll tolerate those who want to take pictures, but at a price. They need to listen to what she has to say.

“This is atomic bombs?” the man asks her in a heavily accented voice. “How long is here?”

“Thirty years,” Connie says.

“Wow, long time,” he says. Connie asks where he is from.

“Chile,” he says. “South America.”

Connie smiles and answers in Spanish. She gives him several handouts, then settles back into her blue canvas chair. She watches waves of tourists parade past.

Her fingers gingerly trace her sore shoulder, still not quite healed from the accident. “It is swelling again,” she says. “The heat. No good.”

She tilts her head back, her expression resolute beneath her layers of headgear.

“But, sacrifice,” she says firmly, answering her own complaint. “We have to stop the world from being destroyed.”

She fixes a steely gaze on the White House and recites her common refrain.

“I have to be here. This is my life.”

***

View Photo Gallery —Connie Picciotto has spent 32 years protesting nuclear arms and handing out literature in front of the White House.

As a culture, we say we respect passion and admire dedication. But the line between activist and zealot sometimes blurs. When we think someone has crossed it, we get uncomfortable, suspicious. We distance ourselves from the person whose actions we can’t quite understand.

Yet doesn’t true activism demand some degree of eccentricity, even extremism? Can a person be a saint and crazy? Is Connie both? Neither? And, if it matters, whose judgment is the one that counts?

Connie’s desire for peace is rooted in a wish to protect the world’s children — a longing that grew from her attempt to protect one child. What she says she wants is clear. How she came to want it is complicated.

***

The historic vigil began officially on June 3, 1981, when Connie joined William Thomas, a protester who had positioned himself outside the White House gates with a hand-lettered sign: “Wanted — Wisdom and Honesty.”

Connie, a former embassy secretary in New York who was working as a part-time nanny for a local family, had come to Washington to plead for the government’s help with a family crisis. Thomas (he was known to everyone by his last name) was a self-described philosopher, a wanderer who had dropped out of high school, pilgrimaged overseas and held odd jobs in New York and New Jersey before winding up in Washington.

“I saw that he was sincere to do what he was doing,” Connie says.

She sat down beside him. Within hours, they were arrested for illegally camping in Lafayette Square. When they were released, Thomas told her, “Since we are both seeking peace and justice, we should become a team.” So they did.

Connie had read about nuclear issues and had been horrified by photographs of the aftermath of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. She adopted Thomas’s message as her own: They were pro-peace, anti-nuclear proliferation and anti-government deception. They dedicated their lives to their cause, which mostly meant that they would sit across the street from one of the most powerful buildings in the free world and talk to the visitors who came by, hand out literature and display their signs. They would do this night and day, in freezing cold and scorching heat, through rains that soaked their clothes and winds that scattered their pamphlets across the pavement. They had only their flimsy umbrella-shelter for protection; actual tents had been banned in the park.

They trod the fine line between passivity and activism and spanned a transition period in the evolution of protest. The vigil came long after the marches and sit-ins that mobilized a generation in the 1960s. It came long before Occupy camps appeared around the globe, drawing criticism from some who questioned the movement’s organization and authenticity.

Connie and Thomas believed that changing even a handful of minds through their signs, their words was enough. Their endurance alone would be a powerful testament, an ever-pre­sent symbol of the need for change.

The timeline was indefinite, since world peace is an endless quest. Unlike more focused causes — abortion, same-sex marriage — it’s too vast for individual laws to measure progress. The demand for peace is as much about human will as it is about government actions.

For years, Connie and Thomas lived mostly in the streets. They survived on donations of money, clothes and food. They slept in the park, stealthily. Connie remembers that there was a Hardee’s nearby and a doughnut shop, and the employees would give the activists leftover food. The pair bathed at friends’ homes.

“We weren’t living — we survived,” Connie says.

In 1984, an administrative assistant at the National Wildlife Federation discovered the protesters while conducting research for a play about homeless people. Ellen Benjamin says she recognized Thomas immediately; she had seen him in her dreams.

“Thomas has told me not to tell people this, but I can’t help telling it because it is the truth: I recognized his face, his voice, his words,” Ellen says. “I’d been having dreams at night about him since I was a child. And this flabbergasted me.”

At the time, Ellen had a comfortable, middle-class existence: a nice apartment, a good job.

“Within three weeks, I had quit my job and joined the vigil, and three weeks after that, he and I were married,” she says. She became Ellen Thomas.

Connie was profoundly distressed by the whirlwind romance. She was — and remains — convinced that Ellen had joined the cause purely to exploit Thomas. “She is a vulture,” Connie says of Ellen, spitting the word.

Despite the unrelenting tension, Thomas and the two women who were devoted to him demonstrated together in the park every day. And nearly every day, Ellen says, Connie would tell anyone who listened that Ellen was a liar, a manipulator, a spy. Connie preached conflicting messages of personal anger and global peace.

“It was an odd marriage, because Connie was always right there in the middle of it hating my guts,” Ellen says. “But we kept at it for 25 years, and I’m a patient person, and I just accepted that as how it was.”

Time ticked on. The activists persevered, through confrontations with police and hostile tourists, through arrests and courtroom hearings and stays in jail. Thomas and Ellen were once sentenced to 90 days for violating National Park Service rules. Connie kept the protest going while her partners were behind bars.

Causes ignited and subsided around them: the wars in the Middle East, human rights abuses in China, genocide in Africa, conflict in Israel. The vigil-keepers supported all demonstrations for peace but remained focused on their anti-nuclear initiatives. Thomas and Ellen called their grass-roots movement the Proposition One Campaign, with the ambitious goal of global disarmament. But Connie distanced herself from messages and petitions directly associated with Proposition One, because Ellen was the driving force behind it.

In 1993, the campaign had its most significant success when the activists circulated a petition calling for nuclear disarmament, resulting in a ballot initiative passed by District voters. Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District’s congressional delegate, took notice.

“Far more important than getting my attention, they got the attention of D.C. voters at a time when nuclear proliferation was a more high-profile issue,” Norton says in an interview in her Capitol Hill office. “It showed that there were others with them.”

Norton worked with the activists to craft a nuclear disarmament and conversion act that would “speak in legislative terms that were more realistic,” Norton says. Versions have been introduced to 10 sessions of Congress, and Norton plans to do so again this year. The legislation has never gone to the floor for a vote, and the world has moved no closer to nuclear disarmament, Norton says. But these facts are not reflective of the vigil’s larger impact.

“They want to keep the issue of nuclear proliferation and its potential terrible consequences before the public,” Norton says. “And they have chosen a prime spot to do it. That’s brilliant. … We won’t ever know what the success is, because it doesn’t have a specific end of the kind we are used to.”

To understand the value of what they do, Norton says, you must understand the history of American activism.

“Everybody who protests in this country understands how incremental change is, and if you’re not going to stick to it, it’s not going to happen,” she says. If a topic isn’t at the forefront of the public consciousness, “maybe you can’t keep a movement going, but you can keep an issue alive.”

Ellen and Connie both say the vigil’s influence is immeasurable: Hundreds of thousands of people walk past the White House every year, and many stop to offer praise.

“People always tell me, ‘We need more people like you,’ ” Connie says. “I tell them: ‘But it starts with you. You are responsible for what’s going on.’ If people were more concerned, I wouldn’t have to be there.”

***

Connie in her basement apartment at Peace House. (Bill O’Leary)

When Thomas’s mother died in 1999, Thomas first wanted to give his $90,000 inheritance away, even burn the money to make a statement about materialism. But Ellen persuaded him to buy a rundown house on 12th Street NW. It took them years to fix it up, Ellen says, but they finally had a proper home. They called it Peace House.

It became a sanctuary for wandering activists. Some stayed for days, others for weeks or months. Thomas, Ellen and Connie remained a constant trio, but they were often surrounded by others who helped out around Peace House and covered shifts at the vigil. The house was a constantly evolving community whose members scraped by with modest grants and donations.

In 2008, after Thomas’s father died, Ellen and Thomas decided to buy a second home in North Carolina. Thomas, a 61-year-old drinker and smoker who suffered from diabetes and congestive heart failure, had been ordered by a judge to stay away from the park for a year following a confrontation with police. Ellen urged him to head south temporarily to recover and begin work on a book about their cause. She went first.

Soon after, in January 2009, Thomas was standing in the Peace House kitchen with Connie and a friend, Acie Gearheart, when he suddenly clutched his chest and tumbled to the floor.

“He collapsed,” Connie remembers. She lifts a trembling hand and drops it to her lap: He fell that hard, that fast.

Acie attempted CPR while they waited for help to arrive.

“I told the ambulance, ‘Please, please, save him,’ ” Connie says. But Thomas was gone.

Connie and Ellen were both determined to carry on in Thomas’s memory. Ellen continued her activism from her new home and started writing the book, meeting with Norton annually to discuss their legislative efforts.

Connie believed that Thomas had never really planned to go to North Carolina, that he never would have left. She made signs to honor her lost comrade and returned to the park the day after he died.

***

Four years later, Connie’s presence at the vigil has necessarily diminished. In late 2011, she was joined at Peace House by dozens of protesters from the Occupy movement; they took turns at the vigil to relieve Connie after the accident left her unable to continue prolonged shifts.

It’s not clear how long the arrangement will last. Ellen, who still owns Peace House, says she can’t afford to keep paying for the place; she would like the activists to stay and continue their work, but they haven’t been able to cover all the expenses. She intends to ask the residents, including Connie, to vacate this spring if they can’t produce a down payment.

Connie says that William Thomas established Peace House as a nonprofit, though there are no records available to support this, and insists that it needs to be maintained as a memorial to him.

“This house cannot be sold,” she says. “Thomas’s blood is in this house.” She insists that the Occupiers need to stay.

If — when — Connie can’t keep attending the vigil, would the young activists become the future of the movement? Would they carry on her legacy?

“I hope,” she says.

On a cold November afternoon, a mohawked Peace House resident named Michael arrives at the vigil shortly before 2 p.m. to relieve Connie. As she gathers her things into a reusable grocery bag, Michael issues the standard assessment to the reporter hovering nearby.

“She’s a hero,” he says and nods resolutely. He repeats the word: “Hero.”

It’s a word Connie hears often, from passersby or fellow activists who are emphatic in their praise. What is less clear is whether Connie’s supporters applaud the substance or the symbolism of her work. By what measure do they evaluate heroism? Impact? Intent? Connie offers only vague instructions to the tourists who stop to talk. Get involved, pay attention, take responsibility, she tells them. She follows the news only to some degree — she reads al-Jazeera online and a few political blogs — but her outrage is focused broadly on those who target innocent lives, especially children.

When she reads certain stories (lately, they’re often about Gaza or Syria), “it hurts me to see people screaming for justice,” she says. “I want to help them. But I’m a victim, too.”

She shuffles home. Cabs whip around corners too fast, bicyclists blur past as she limps along, her small body hunched in her blue coat. Despite her size and halting gait, there is some measure of defiance to every movement; she walks outside the lines of sidewalks and crosswalks, cutting across the grass in Lafayette Square and the middle of a busy intersection at 15th and K. She ignores the second glances of people who stand beside her, waiting for the light to change.

It takes her about 25 minutes to get back to 12th Street, to her garden filled with rehabilitated plants outside her pink-walled basement apartment. It’s a modest living space, with a galley kitchen, a mattress on the floor, a table covered in papers and her laptop computer, a radio that chatters the news quietly all the time. There is a cat, an orange tabby named Bobby, who shares the space.

Bobby is among the few loved ones immortalized in photographs on a shelf near the bed. There is an old image of a uniform-clad uncle from Spain, the only evidence of a family Connie won’t discuss. There is a picture of Thomas on his bicycle near the vigil.

And then, beside the portrait of Thomas, a photograph of a baby girl with pudgy cheeks and dark hair. A sweet-faced child holding a teddy bear in her lap.

***

On the summer day in 1981 when Connie first sat down beside Thomas in the park, she wasn’t thinking about nuclear bombs. She had not come to Washington with global ambitions. She just wanted her daughter back.

The picture of Olga as a toddler is the most recent image Connie has of her now-adult daughter. It’s the same picture in the pamphlet Connie hands out to strangers, which offers a summary of her personal history. There are other photos in the pamphlet, too: Connie beside her then-husband at a dinner party, and a grainy wedding portrait that shows her as a young bride in a floor-length ivory gown. Her dark hair is swept back under a white veil. She beams at the groom.

These pictures are what remain of her life before the vigil — along with piles and folders of documents, records that Connie says chronicle her persecution at the hands of her ex-husband, lawyers, doctors and the U.S. government.

What matters of her life happened here, in America, she says, and she won’t speak of what came before she arrived from Spain in 1960. She first lived in New York City, she says, and worked for the Economic and Commercial Office of the Spanish Embassy. She became an American citizen and met a dark-haired Italian man at a friend’s wedding. The two were married Oct. 29, 1969.

They wanted to have a family. “I like children very much, but we couldn’t have them,” she says.

When Connie and her husband had no luck finding a child to adopt in New York, a friend of her husband’s suggested they try Argentina. In 1973, the couple traveled to Buenos Aires, where they were met by the friend’s family. At the time, Argentina was teetering on the precipice of a brutal military junta.

“They introduced us to doctors, and they promised to find us a baby, but we had to pay them,” she says. “They brought us babies to look at, in a car. All of them were newborns.”

Olga was two hours old when a midwife brought her to Connie and her husband. There was no word of her biological parents, Connie says. She never knew who they were or what had happened to them.

This is where Connie’s story gives way to overlapping conspiracy theories. Connie believes that the adoption was illegal and that her husband and their adoption lawyer knew this. She believes that her husband also had an intimate relationship with an older woman who conspired to ruin the marriage. She is convinced that her husband began poisoning her; every morning she woke up feeling weak and sick.

“I didn’t understand that it was a baby-selling ring,” she says. “I was so naive … and then they wanted to make me disappear.”

Her husband and the lawyer separated her from Olga and tried to have her committed to a hospital, she says.

“He claimed I was sick in my head,” she says of her husband.

Connie says she was admitted against her will to Coney Island Hospital in late 1973 and later transferred to Pilgrim Psychiatric Center on Long Island. With the help of a nun from a New York convent, Connie says, she was eventually released and fled to Spain.

There, she received a thorough examination. As she recounts this part of the story, Connie pulls out two papers; copies of the same document, written in Spanish and English. It appears to be a medical record, indicating that she has been found to be of sound mind and general good health — with the exception of a broken eardrum, an injury she says she received when her husband struck her.

Connie says she was afraid to return to the United States, but she was also desperate to get her daughter back. She traveled instead to Canada, where she says she stayed with friends from her embassy days while working with lawyers in New York to determine her legal avenues.

“Everybody was persecuting me,” she says. “They always said that I was crazy and tried to put me away.”

When months passed and she had no luck with lawyers in New York, she decided to go instead to Washington in 1979 to seek help from the government.

Spokespersons at Coney Island Hospital and Pilgrim Psychiatric Center said they could not confirm or discuss patient records. The adoption lawyer could not be located. The convent did exist, but for 15 years the address has belonged to an immigrant services organization. The Economic and Commercial Office of the Spanish Embassy confirmed that Connie had worked there as a receptionist from 1967 to 1969 but could not provide details. Connie’s ex-husband could not be reached for comment.

Questions about the particular details of Connie’s history often frustrate her. “It’s all in my book,” she says, irritated, with a wave of her hand. For years she worked on a detailed memoir on her old laptop, which, she says, was stolen by a man who was staying at Peace House. Connie has a pending complaint against the alleged thief, but he has yet to respond to a court order to return her property.

What is certain is what she believes, and what she believes has shaped the past three decades of her life.

“That’s how my odyssey began, seeking legal help,” she says firmly. “I was trying to get custody of my baby.”

After months in Washington, she says, she became convinced that she was being persecuted by the government. That’s why she wears her helmet; the government, she says gravely, is aiming electromagnetic waves at her head.

Why?

“That is a very complicated story,” she says, then offers a simple answer: “They want to stop me.”

She experienced weakness, pains, mysterious burns, she says, which she believes were the result of illegal government tests. And she’d made no progress toward reclaiming her lost daughter.

The day Connie first sat beside Thomas in the park, she was frightened and defeated. She felt she had been left with no choice but to join his cause.

“Since I couldn’t do anything to help my child, the only thing to do was to help the other children of the world,” she says. “I had to keep them from being destroyed.”

***

The 2012 election season ends; President Obama secures a second term, and construction begins outside the White House in preparation for inaugural festivities. That means Connie has to move from her usual spot, and the vigil stands instead beside the park’s central statue of Andrew Jackson. She knows this routine well by now. “Every four years,” she says.

Every four years, she has held out hope that a president might speak to her. She and Thomas always wanted to share their message with a leader who could make a real impact, she says.

“We weren’t there just hoping for that,” she says. “But we thought maybe they would come, or send someone, across the street.”

After Obama is reelected, she writes him a letter.

She won’t discuss what it says. She wants to give him time to consider the evidence she laid out and conduct a thorough investigation of her case.

“And not only to investigate, but to talk to me,” she says. “All these years, not one president has come. I’m waiting for a reply.”

***

There are others, though, who devote a great deal of attention to the determined activist.

In late November, Feriha Kaya and Mira Dabit, who call themselves the co-organizers of Peace House, are struggling to meet a Dec. 1 deadline to raise $300,000 toward the house’s purchase price. There are pledges from potential donors, but not one penny in hand.

“We tried our best, and we’re still doing our best,” Feriha says. “There are people and resources who have promised us money.”

The two women make sure that the residents of Peace House pull their weight. About a dozen people live there full time, though at the height of the Occupy movement, that number was closer to 40.

“People don’t just come and sleep and hang out,” Feriha says. “We are very disciplined. This is a community house. People wake up at 7:30 and get started on chores.”

Feriha and Mira, along with a few other residents, are responsible for paying Ellen a monthly rent of $1,100 as well as covering utilities. The house also raises money through donations and events, Feriha says.

The two young women sit in the warm sunshine on the aqua-painted front steps of Peace House. Feriha, 24, a soft-spoken student who moved into the house in March 2011, speaks fondly of its community of artists and activists. Mira, 27, a Palestinian with a nose ring and a disarming smile, says she grew up surrounded by conflict in Israel and spent time volunteering with peace activists in Northern Ireland before coming to the United States.

Losing Peace House, they say, is simply not an option. They need the house to continue their efforts, and Connie needs a place to live to continue her work. To Feriha and Mira, who had established a closer relationship to Connie than other residents of the house, Connie was on par with the most iconic of activists.

“Like Gandhi or Mother Teresa,” Feriha says. “She is a legend in her own way. … What has she accomplished, people ask. If she’s spoken to just a few people who understand her message, she’s done more than most. She gives the message of peace. She talks about what war is creating.”

Connie can make a hard impression, Feriha says, but there is another side. “Consider the garden: Connie rescues abandoned plants and tends to them, and they flourish here. She values all life.”

Feriha says she is fascinated by the way people react to Connie, how many tourists and passersby seem more intimidated and unnerved by a flimsy white tent than by the symbolic power of the White House, where men with assault rifles stalk the perimeter of the roof.

“Some people won’t dare come close,” she says. “People automatically assume there must be something wrong with this person, which speaks to our fear and our lack of understanding.”

At this, Mira nods emphatically. “Exactly,” she says, lighting a cigarette.

“Here is a woman who hurts nobody, who is a legend, who has the longest-running peace vigil,” Feriha says. “People can’t understand why she does this, so they have to qualify it: ‘She’s homeless, right? She’s crazy, right?’ ”

Mira exhales a puff of smoke. “She’s got more commitment than any president who has lived across the street from her,” she says. “They change every four years. She never changes. She says: ‘This is me; this is forever. This is until I pass.’ ”

She shakes her head, her eyebrows raised, an expression of admiration. “She never gives up, man.”

Feriha says she has faith that the house will persevere in the end, somehow, despite the reality of a looming deadline and no money with which to meet it.

“Maybe I’m too naive or visionary, but I’m convinced it will turn out fine,” she says.

Instead, December brings a sudden and heartbreaking blow.

When Mira first started feeling sick, she told Feriha she thought it was a urinary tract infection. Mira didn’t have health insurance, and she was stubborn about going to doctors, Feriha says.

Mira left Peace House to stay with another friend nearby, hoping she could rest better there; Peace House, Feriha says, can be “chaotic.” Mira went to a clinic, but the staff didn’t diagnose an infection or prescribe antibiotics. Her condition worsened. On the night of Dec. 15, she collapsed suddenly and died in the ambulance on the way to Washington Hospital Center. Doctors said the cause was a blood clot resulting from the untreated infection, Feriha says.

The Peace House community is mourning. Residents gather to share stories of Mira, and one paints a memorial portrait to display in the large living room. Connie grieves, too; she weeps with Feriha when she learns the news. It is another loss — for the movement, and for her.

In the aftermath of Mira’s death, unpaid bills pile up at Peace House. Ellen Thomas says that though she doesn’t want to force the Occupiers and Connie to leave the house, she feels she is running out of time and options.

Connie continues to vehemently deny Ellen’s claim to the house. Still, Ellen says she is determined to rise above Connie’s hostility.

“I have huge respect for Connie. I have unconditional love for Connie.” Ellen says with a laugh. “But I don’t really like her very much.”

Like most of the people who have known Connie the most intimately, Ellen is reluctant to address the question of Connie’s mental health.

“I think there are issues that haven’t been addressed,” she says.

And like most of the people who have known Connie the most intimately, Ellen is quick to hail the value of her legacy.

“She’s little and a bulldog, and she’s probably no less difficult to live with than a number of Catholic saints probably were. I think she’s blessed by God. I think she’s taken care of. She’s not able to do so many of the things that you and I can do — but she can do what so many other people can’t do, just by sticking to it and by not giving up.”

Despite her seemingly endless capacity for perseverance, Connie says she has long surrendered any hope of reconnecting with her daughter. At first, Connie says she hasn’t tried to contact Olga since she was a little girl; Connie worried that if Olga knew the details of the conspiracy, Olga, too, might become a target.

But Ellen and Acie Gearheart, Thomas’s friend who covered shifts at the vigil many years ago, tell a different story. Acie says he twice drove Connie and Thomas north to find Olga, first in New York, then in New Jersey. Ellen remembers those trips, too; Thomas told her about them when he came back.

Acie’s memory isn’t great, he acknowledges. He has lived hard, and he’s older now. But he remembers driving up the first time about the late ’80s. The second trip was more recent, about 10 years ago. On the first trip, Olga was a young girl, he says, about middle school age. Connie knew the girl was still living in the house Connie had shared with her ex-husband.

When the three arrived at the house, they didn’t knock on the door or try to talk to Olga or her father, Acie’s says. Instead, they took hundreds of fliers they had printed — the fliers displayed photos of Olga and her adopted parents, alongside the words “The Untold Story” — and plastered them all over the surrounding neighborhood. For a woman who identified her life’s purpose through messages printed on signs and posters, announcing such a personal appeal on every street corner might have seemed perfectly natural.

“We pasted literally thousands of them in that area, all night long put up these stickers all over the place so the kid couldn’t walk anyplace in that area without seeing it,” Acie says.

The idea was that Olga would inevitably see the picture and the claim of a lost mother, and she’d know Connie was trying to find her. But it’s not clear that Connie thought about what effect such a startling act might have on Olga, who would step outside her door into a sea of pictures of her own face.

They drove back to Washington at dawn, Acie says, never knowing what came of their efforts.

Connie won’t directly answer a question about her attempts to contact Olga. She shakes her head and says, “That’s all right.” Then, after a moment of quiet, “I was afraid to get close to the house.”

Years after the first trip, when Olga was older and married and living in New Jersey, Acie drove Thomas and Connie to Olga’s home. This time, Connie carried a box of items she wanted Olga to have. Acie and Ellen weren’t positive of everything in the box, but they knew there was a bracelet that belonged to Olga as a toddler.

Connie knocked on the door of the house, Acie says. A man who Acie believes was Olga’s husband answered the door and spoke to Connie.

“It didn’t look like he was going to take the box,” Acie says. “Thomas and I stepped out of the vehicle, and then he took the box.”

In all these years, Connie has never heard from Olga.

Through her husband, Olga Picciotto Preiser declined to comment for this story.

Connie is sitting at the little round table in her apartment. It is a cold January day, and she leans to adjust a space heater sitting on the floor, turning it toward her feet. She just shakes her head. For several minutes, the only sound is the soft drone of her radio.

“It’s so sad, what happened,” Connie says suddenly, loudly, her eyes wet. She might be talking about Olga. She might be talking about herself and the mother she never got to be.

Connie hands out literature to tourists in Lafayette Square in April. (Bill O’Leary)

The last of the inaugural gates have finally come down, and the vigil has returned to its usual spot at the edge of the park.

On an early spring day, a group of Scouts is gathered around its leader in Lafayette Square. He points out Connie’s vigil and tells them a brief version of its history. The protesters have a right to be here, he says, even if some object to what they say, even if their presence disrupts the elegance and grandeur of the setting. The Scout leader wants the boys to understand Connie’s relevance — but when the time comes to pose for a group photograph, they are directed to line up strategically so that only the desired landmarks are in the frame. Connie and her display disappear behind a wall of brown uniforms.

It is 10 months into Connie’s 32nd year of protest.It is almost three months into Obama’s second term as president. The white tent and the White House, a wide avenue and a world apart.

Connie knows the view from here by heart, probably better than anyone else does or ever will. She knows the spot along the wrought-iron gates where tourists always pose for pictures, and the slope of the flawless lawn beyond, the stately columns of the North Portico.

You can see the park from the other side of the street, too, through certain windows in certain rooms — the ones with old wood floors and gold-fabric curtains, where the most high-profile ceremonial events and announcements take place. Rooms where it seems particularly unlikely that the president might find a moment to pause and look through the panes of bullet-proof glass.

But imagine he did. Here is the gold-domed church on the far side of H Street, the stone silhouette of Andrew Jackson astride his rearing horse, the bustle of workday professionals cutting through the park with cellphones clamped to their ears. Closer, he would see flower beds filled with sprouting tulips along the red-brick walkways, meandering tourists clutching cameras. And in front of it all, a makeshift tent framed by tall wooden signs. He might discern the stooped shape of one small woman beside it, made faceless by distance but instantly recognizable — not for who she is, but what she does.

She is still there, and she is waiting.

Caitlin Gibson is a Washington Post staff writer.  Staff researcher Magda Jean-Louis contributed to this story.

 

Game designed by chronic pain pt denied their medication… Pharmacist “not comfortable ” ?

You Must Kill a Pharmacist for Hitman’s Newest Mission

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/you-must-kill-a-pharmacist-for-hitmans-newest-miss/1100-6443648/

The next Elusive Target for Hitman has been announced. This mission, which is Hitman’s 10th Elusive Target since launch, sees players tracking down a mysterious pharmacist.

The mission goes live on the in-game Featured Hub today, September 16, starting at 5 AM PT / 8 AM ET. You will need to own the first episode to find the target, as she’s located in Paris.

3130279-elusive.jpg

As with previous Elusive Targets, the pharmacist will only be in the location for a set period of time–168 hours (7 days) in this case. And there are no second chances. If you miss out, you may never have another chance to take down the target and earn rewards.

If you complete five Elusive Targets, you’ll get the Hitman Absolution Signature Suit (see it below), while completing all 10 will unlock the Blood Money Signature Suit.

3130278-bloodmoney.jpg

Lead online designer Torben Ellert spoke to GameSpot earlier this year about how developer IO Interactive wanted to make Elusive Targets get more difficult.

“We probably want the first couple at least to be quite approachable experiences, because it’s really important that we make it clear that these are not impossible missions,” he said. “Yes, they’re tense, because if you screw up, you’re finished. But they’re totally doable. I think we need to keep that for the next couple, but as we go down the line, we will improve on their perceptiveness, where it makes narrative sense.”