Is Suicide a Consequence of the CDC Opioid Guideline?

Is Suicide a Consequence of the CDC Opioid Guideline?

http://www.painmedicinenews.com/Commentary/Article/08-16/Is-Suicide-a-Consequence-of-the-CDC-Opioid-Guideline-/37442/ses=ogst

By Lynn R. Webster, MD

imageThe law of unintended consequences states that the actions of people, and especially of governments, always have effects that are unanticipated, as when legislation and regulation aimed at righting a problem go wrong in other ways (Unintended consequences. http://tinyurl.com/?8p8g). An example may be the guideline issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) discouraging the use of opioids in treating chronic pain, excluding cancer and end of life (MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65:1-49).

The guideline was not intended to be mandatory; yet, as I predicted in a previous roundtable discussion, the stature of the CDC appears to have resulted in it being viewed by many as more than a guideline (“Draft CDC Opioid Guideline: Pain Medicine Experts Discuss,” Pain Medicine News January/February 2016). A growing number of reports suggest that the guideline is responsible for people with chronic pain throughout the country being tapered or withdrawn from opioids or dropped entirely from physicians’ practices, even if the patients have been on stable doses of opioids for years with attendant improved pain and quality of life (Chronic pain patients are suffering because of the US government’s ongoing War on Drugs. Quartz. http://qz.com/?694616).

Pain News Network reports that dozens of patients have contacted the editor since March, when the guideline was made public, to say that their doctors have “fired” them on flimsy excuses, or that their doctors suddenly are weaning them off opioids or abruptly cutting them off from the medications (Are CDC Opioid Guidelines Causing More Suicides? Pain News Network May 27, 2016).

ADVERTISEMENT

Worse is that some patients are so despondent and in so much pain that they have given up and looked to suicide as a way out. As Pain News Network reports, nearly 43,000 Americans committed suicide in 2014, more than twice the number of deaths that have been linked to overdoses of opioid pain medications. Anecdotal reports that chronic pain contributes greatly must not be dismissed. I am certain this is not a consequence intended or anticipated by the CDC, but tragically it is playing out.

‘Everyone Has a Breaking Point’

The following are passages from a message I received from a person in pain, in response to one of my blogs. (They have been edited for clarity.)

“After this Easter, my life turned off a cliff and nosedived. My best friend in the world, who suffered with chronic pain, checked out because he was tired of living with pain, doctors and judgment. He was just tired of it all. So many people are disgusted with the CDC’s guidelines—as am I—as they cast far too wide of a net and caught a lot of innocent victims in it.”

image

This man, a veteran, goes on to write of his personal involvement and knowledge of the opioid crisis as a sufferer of chronic pain and father who lost a 21-year-old daughter to—as he puts it—“the OxyContin Express that roared through Florida.”

“Persons in power too often see the world in black and white. They forget there is a gray area where most of us live—reality.”

The Department of Veterans Affairs is adopting the guideline, which was written to be voluntary, “as law,” he writes, “ripping 12-year–compliant patients off meds.” He is one of those patients with many years of passed urine drug screens and prescription drug monitoring checks behind him.

“This is the kind of foolishness that pushed my pal to the point he felt backed in a corner, put a gun to his chest, and pulled the trigger. I knew this man 35 years. … Everyone has a breaking point.”

This friend had shared his fears of having his treatment taken away.

“He asked me if I would forgive him if he took his own life. I told him I would. This has been a heavy burden to carry. But loving someone unconditionally comes with a heavy load.”

Now 58, the man who wrote this letter said he flinches now when he hears of anyone taking his or her life due to untreated pain. Further, he is steeling himself to deal with his own pain issues as changes to his medical treatment appear inevitable and also—as he puts it—impersonal.

“So now at 58 years old, here we go again. … The way my medical conditions were being treated for the past 12 years was about to change. … I’m no doctor, no pharmacist, no rocket scientist, but even I know you can’t do that to a human being without reprisal. So here I am picking up the pieces. I hope and pray others make it through the changes OK. I hope I make it OK.” Making it through is all he wants.

Innocent Victims

Undeniably, the country is experiencing a serious opioid crisis, which must be addressed. However, the steps to reverse the opioid crisis should not cause greater harm to the innocent and those hurting the most in our society. Our politicians and policymakers must be advised that their actions have unintended consequences. If the unintended consequences of the guideline cause greater harm than the intended positive consequences, then the only rational and compassionate path forward is to change the focus and direction. Perhaps it is time to recognize the needs of people in pain with an urgency equal to that for people with opioid addictions.

AgeWise: Making a trip to the ED less stressful

 

AgeWise: Making a trip to the ED less stressful

http://www.journalnow.com/news/local/agewise-making-a-trip-to-the-ed-less-stressful/article_ffe0f0ea-0d95-5867-ba70-a423d0aea9e6.html

Q: We had an emergency over the holidays with my mother that almost required an emergency department visit. It got me wondering are there certain things we should look for in a hospital/ED? What is being done to make them senior friendly?

MJ

Answer: A trip to an Emergency Department (ED) can be difficult and stressful at any age. It can be particularly difficult for older adults, who often have a number of health problems and take multiple medications. Because EDs tend to be noisy and hectic, older people can feel overwhelmed. And, if they have to spend a lot of time there, they have a greater chance of developing delirium — serious mental confusion that can sometimes lead to difficulty thinking and remembering.

 

Fortunately, EDs are becoming more “senior-friendly” as hospitals are making changes so they are safer for older people. Some hospitals are even creating special EDs just for older adults. If you are older, or if you care for an older person, it can be helpful to learn more about the Emergency Department that is closest to where you live as this is where you will likely be taken if you need emergency care. When you visit, ask the staff the five questions below. According to the Health in Aging Foundation, these five questions are important to know and consider:

  1. Is there someone on the ED staff with specialized training in the care of older adults? Geriatricians are doctors with advanced training in caring for older people. Nurses, physician assistants, and other members of the health care team may also have advanced training in geriatrics. These professionals are important members of the ED team because older people may respond differently to medications and other treatments than younger people do.
  1. Geriatrics health professionals are well aware of these differences.
  1. Is there someone at the hospital I can speak with about advanced directives? Advanced directives are legal papers that explain what kind of end-of-life care a person wants, and doesn’t want. For example, in an advanced directive an older person may note that he does not want to be kept alive with a respirator — a device that can breathe for you if you can’t breathe on your own.
  2. How do you help make triage less stressful for older people? Triage is a standard system for deciding which patients at an ED get treated first. With triage, patients who need care the most get treated first. Because Emergency Departments are often busy, waits can be long for those who don’t need immediate help. This can be a problem because older adults who have long waits may run an increased risk of developing delirium. Ask the staff if they can move an older person to a quieter, calmer room if they have a long wait. Ask what else they do to make older people’s time in their department less stressful.
  3. Does the hospital use medication reconciliation and full pharmacy reviews? These practices lower the chance that an older patient will get incorrect medications or medicines at the wrong doses. Medication errors are the most common medical errors. Many of these errors can be avoided with regular medication reconciliations. These reviews involve making a complete list of a patient’s medications, and then comparing that list with the list of medications in the patient’s record. Pharmacy reviews involve creating a complete and correct list of the current medications a patient should be taking, every time the patient moves from one health care setting to another
  1. — such as from the ED to a hospital room to a rehabilitation facility
  1. .
  2. What do you do to limit the number of “transitions of care” that older adults go through after they reach the ED? Between the time they reach the ED and the time they return to their home, older adults may be moved to new locations several times. For example, they may be transferred to an Intensive Care Unit
  1. (ICU)
 
  1. , to a hospital room, to a rehabilitation facility, and back to where they live. With each move
  1. (care transition)
  1. , patients get care from different health care providers. However, research shows that older people who go through fewer transitions are given fewer inappropriate medications and have better health outcomes.

For more information about this and other topics related to the health of older adults, visit Health in Aging Foundation at www.healthinagingfoundation.org.

Frieden to Resign as CDC Director

Frieden to Resign as CDC Director

www.painnewsnetwork.org/stories/2016/12/31/frieden-to-resign-as-cdc-director

Dr. Thomas Frieden, who has headed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for nearly eight years and played a pivotal role in the agency’s opioid prescribing guidelines, plans to submit his resignation on January 20, the day of President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration.   

Frieden disclosed his plans in a year-end interview with Reuters. The former New York City health commissioner did not say what he planned to do next.

Frieden’s resignation is not surprising, as incoming administrations usually do not retain the heads of federal agencies, most of whom are political appointees.  Food and Drug Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, who has only been in office for 10 months, has not been contacted by the Trump transition team and is also expected to be replaced, according to The Washington Post.

President-elect Trump has not yet said who he will nominate to succeed Califf or who he will appoint to replace Frieden.

Frieden has an extensive background in epidemiology and infectious diseases, and his tenure at the CDC was marked by major efforts to combat outbreaks of the Ebola virus, fungal meningitis, influenza and the Zika virus. He also doggedly pursued a controversial campaign to put prescribing limits on opioid pain medication, an area traditionally overseen by the FDA.

“One of the most heartbreaking problems I’ve faced as CDC director is our nation’s opioid crisis,” Frieden recently wrote in a commentary published by Fox News. 

“This crisis was caused, in large part, by decades of prescribing too many opioids for too many conditions where they provide minimal benefit and is now made worse by wide availability of cheap, potent, and easily available illegal opioids: heroin, illicitly made fentanyl, and other, newer illicit synthetic opioids. These deadly drugs have found a ready market in people primed for addiction by misuse of prescription opioids.”

thomas frieden, md

thomas frieden, md

But Frieden’s campaign to reign in opioid prescribing has failed to slow the soaring number of overdose deaths, which continued to rise throughout his tenure at CDC, killing 52,000 Americans last year alone.

His repeated claim that the use of prescription opioids by legitimate patients is “intertwined” with the overdose epidemic is also not supported by facts. Only a small percentage of pain patients become addicted to opioid medication or graduate to heroin and other illegal street drugs.

Yet Frieden remains a staunch supporter of the CDC guidelines, calling them an “excellent starting point” to prevent opioid abuse, even though the guidelines themselves state they are based on scientific evidence that is “low in quality.”

“There are safer drugs and treatment approaches that can control pain as well or better than opioids for the vast majority of patients. We must reduce the number of Americans exposed to opioids for the first time, especially for conditions where the risks of opioids outweigh the benefits,” Frieden wrote.

“We must not forget what got us here in the first place. Doctors’ prudent use of the prescription pad and renewed commitment to treat pain more safely and effectively based on what we know now about opioids—as well as healthy awareness of the risks and benefits among patients prescribed these drugs—can change the path of the opioid epidemic.”

Frieden undoubtedly had good intentions, but his agency repeatedly showed a penchant for arrogance and contempt for the public while drafting the guidelines.  The CDC held no public hearings, and secretly consulted with addiction treatment specialists and special interest groups, but few pain patients or pain physicians.

The CDC finally unveiled the guidelines publicly in September 2015 to a select online audience. The agency didn’t make the guidelines available on its website or in any public form outside of the webinar, and allowed for only a 48-hour comment period. Only when faced with the threat of lawsuits and growing ridicule from patients, physicians and other federal agencies, did the agency reverse course and delay the guidelines for several months. They were released virtually unchanged in March 2016.

Although “voluntary” and meant only for primary care physicians, the guidelines have been widely adopted by pain specialists and other prescribers, and have even become law in several states. This was always the goal of the CDC.

Within a few months of their release, an online survey of nearly 2,000 pain patients found that over two-thirds had their opioid medication reduced or stopped by their doctors. Over half said they had contemplated suicide.

There have been anecdotal reports of suicides increasing in the pain community. A recent story we did about the suicide of a Vermont man who was cut off from opioids and abandoned by his doctor provoked quite a response from readers.

“This situation has got to be stopped before any more people commit suicide to escape the pain. I also suffer from chronic pain and my medications have been cut back so far they no longer work worth a damn,” Michael wrote to us.

“I’m facing the very same thing right now. I’m in utter agony,” said LadyV. “In my doctor’s office I was told I have to reduce you, wean you off. I through no fault of my own suffered a horrible spinal injury and now no one cares.”

“When I was forcibly weaned off my pain meds last spring, due to the push by the DEA and CDC, I wrote a letter to the White House,” wrote Judith Metzger. “I mentioned a need for them to be watching suicide statistics related to uncontrolled chronic pain. There was never any mention that I was suicidal. Still, I got several calls from a suicide crisis team in DC! Reading this tragic story makes it clear that my prediction was sadly correct. When will they ever listen?”

In his commentary for Fox News, Frieden said it was “important that we look upstream and prevent opioid use disorder in the first place.”

In his final weeks at the CDC, now may be a good time for Frieden to look downstream at the havoc his prescribing guidelines have created.

If you want to make a difference…

I have created a Twitter account @painedlives and intention is to use this to send out information to Congress, media that seldom get to them. Because all that gets sent to them is what the DEA press release machine puts out…  https://www.dea.gov/pr/news.shtml

Below is a – cloud based – google spread sheet that I have created – I need people to go to the website and use the link before www.usnpl.com/ to create a database of twitter names for media. The spread sheet can be worked on by a number of people at the same time and it is automatically updated in real time.

We have a new President and Congress as of Jan 23 2017 and the only way that we can get their attention and hopefully cause change is to communicate with them.  Twitter is the first attempt into getting their attention.. without cooperation of those within the chronic pain community to get this database together.. IT WILL NOT GO FORWARD… and most likely the politicians, bureaucrats, and the bureaucracy will continue on the path that it is on and your ability to get adequate pain management and optimize your quality of life will continue to be compromised and deteriorate.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DpY4MNPiHxFUdVJPpnQxdq7wCduIHC9Y5AOmm0ZPgc0/edit#gid=0

www.usnpl.com/

 

A Fed Agency as a FOR-PROFIT Company ?

Dr Peter Gøtzsche exposes big pharma as organized crime

After 46 yrs and > ONE TRILLION spent… CDC believes that 4.8 million will RAISE AWARENESS ON OPIATE ABUSE

CDC Spending $4.8 Million to “Raise Awareness” about Prescription Opioid Abuse

nationalpainreport.com/cdc-spending-4-8-million-to-raise-awareness-about-prescription-opioid-abuse-8832374.html

One would think that the massive amount of attention to prescription opioids and the sweeping changes to guidelines and law that have come this year would be enough to raise awareness in the US. But the CDC thinks that is not enough. It recently awarded a task order of $4.8 million to ICF (NASDAQ:ICFI) develop a large scale advertising program.

According to a press release, “ICF will oversee the development of a large-scale, targeted communications campaign designed to raise awareness about the risks associated with prescription opioid abuse. Among its responsibilities under the task order, ICF will oversee development and placement of digital and social media advertisements and maintain an active social media presence for the campaign. Additionally, ICF will create online, mobile-accessible training for providers. ICF also will develop tools, training and outreach to promote adoption of CDC’s Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain by physicians and other healthcare providers. This work supports the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ commitment to address the opioid crisis as a top priority and intensify its efforts to reduce opioid misuse and abuse.”

“Prescription drug overdose affects a vast number of Americans and their families each year,” said Frances Heilig, vice president for ICF International. “Our communications work on the risks of illicit drug use has given us a solid understanding of the impact of prescription opioid abuse on our society. We look forward to working with the CDC to help dissect and communicate this complex issue to increase its visibility across a variety of audiences and reduce the incidence of drug-related deaths in the United States.”

 

With access to opioids becoming an increasing problem for pain sufferers who do not abuse their medication, one can expect that the onslaught of ads and promotion of the CDC’s restrictive guidelines will simple amplify the problems many face around the country.

2016 in review … what killed us

Here is the list from the end of 2015 if interested in comparing
United States of America
RealTime
CURRENT DEATH TOLL
from Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016 (2:49:32 PM)


Someone just died by: Death Box

Abortion: 1093857
Heart Disease: 615388
Cancer: 592700
Tobacco: 350592
Obesity: 307520
Medical Errors: 251880
Stroke: 133328
Lower Respiratory Disease: 143185
Accident (unintentional): 136283
Hospital Associated Infection: 99168
Alcohol: 100169
Diabetes: 76617
Alzheimer’s Disease: 93699
Influenza/Pneumonia: 55320
Kidney Failure: 42834
Blood Infection: 33521
Suicide: 42845
Drunk Driving: 33865
Unintentional Poisoning: 31812
All Drug Abuse: 25047
Homicide: 16827
Prescription Drug Overdose: 15025
Murder by gun: 11512
Texting while Driving: 5999
Pedestrian: 5008
Drowning: 3922
Fire Related: 3506
Malnutrition: 2777
Domestic Violence: 1462
Smoking in Bed: 781
Falling out of Bed: 600
Killed by Falling Tree: 150
Struck by Lightning: 82
Mass Shooting  *
Domestic:
Radical Islamic Terrorism:
24
49
Pokemon Go: 2

 

Your chance of death is 100%. Are you ready?

Totals of all categories except mass shooting are based upon past trends documented below.


Sources:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus15.pdf#019
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60/nvsr60_04.pdf
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/library/graphs/graphs.htm
http://www.alcoholalert.com/drunk-driving-statistics.html
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/suicide.htm
http://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/prevguid/m0052833/m0052833.asp
http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/Pedestrian_Safety/factsheet.html
http://www.cdc.gov/HomeandRecreationalSafety/Water-Safety/waterinjuries-factsheet.html
http://www.nfpa.org/categoryList.asp?categoryID=953
http://www.dvrc-or.org/domestic/violence/resources/C61/
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1562978,00.html
https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/781687/john-james-a-new-evidence-based-estimate-of.pdf

© 2008-2016 Romans322.com

USA’s appetite for those illegal substances fuels the drive in China to supply

Where Synthetic Opioids Really Come From

http://www.attn.com/stories/13807/where-synthetic-opioids-really-come-from

President-elect Donald Trump’s plan to combat the opioid crisis largely focuses on drug trafficking from Mexico. But in terms of synthetic opioids such as fentanyl and carfentanil — powerful narcotics that have contributed to mass overdoses across the United States in recent years — the problem appears to originate in China, according to an Associated Press investigation.

opioid-indsutryAP/Paul Faith – apimages.com

Last week, Chinese officials dismissed claims by U.S. drug enforcement officials that the country was behind the surge in synthetics. In a letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), China’s National Narcotics Control Commission said the claims “lack the support of sufficient numbers of actual, confirmed cases.”

But according to the DEA, Chinese labs remain the primary manufacturers producing synthetic opioids that are sold online and mailed to the U.S., Canada, or Mexico. DEA spokesperson Melvin Patterson told ATTN: there were two factors driving the distribution channel.

“The main reason there’s a lot of synthetics [in China is] that those [drugs] are controlled in the United States,” Patterson said. “You’re going to face some sort of prosecution if you have those illegally [in the U.S.], and they’re not all controlled in China.”

Shipping containers on a shipyardRalf Hirschberger/picture-alliance/dpa/AP – apimages.com

But Patterson added that synthetic trafficking out of China likely wouldn’t be an issue were it not for American demand. “Our appetite for those illegal substances fuels the drive in China to supply that,” he said. “You get really, really basic into supply and demand. If we didn’t have the demand, they wouldn’t supply that to us.”

There has been progress on the synthetic opioid front. In 2015, the DEA worked with Chinese officials to enact bans on 115 chemicals — including several other synthetic drugs such as K2, Spice, and Flakka — and since then, law enforcement agencies have seen dramatic declines in the use and trafficking of these substances, CNN reported. But the problem persists because chemists continue to alter the chemical makeup of synthetic opioids, temporarily avoiding prosecution until regulators enact bans on those too.

Fentanyl and carfentanil, synthetic opioids that can be significantly stronger than heroin, represent some of the most pressing challenges for drug enforcement agencies. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported this month that fatal overdoses from these substances shot up 72 percent from 2014 to 2015.

syntheticThe Washington Post – washingtonpost.com

But as drug policy officials continue to collaborate on enforcement strategy, there’s hope that what happened to synthetics like K2 and Flakka will happen to fentanyl and carfentanil after China imposes new bans. It’s a temporary solution, but at least in the short-term, it could mean less deadly drugs on the streets.

Online Petitions: used to build databases of names, emails and phone numbers of those who can be called to donate

Online Petitions Take Citizen Participation to New Levels. But Do They Work?

www.nytimes.com/2016/12/28/us/online-petitions-activism.html

Online petitions are all over the place.

Some are political (like one asking members of the Electoral College to vote for Hillary Clinton as president instead of Donald J. Trump); others are unearthly (like one asking that “Star Wars: The Old Republic” series be shown on Netflix).

That first petition drew 4.9 million signatures on Change.org. Nonetheless, members of the Electoral College voted for Mr. Trump on Dec. 19. The second petition drew over 123,000 names.

There has been a proliferation of these petitions — Change.org has more than 100 million users in 196 countries — but are they effective? Do the intended recipients, often policy makers or elected leaders, pay attention?

Worldwide, Change.org users claim one victory per hour, A.J. Walton, a spokesman for the online petition forum, said in an interview.

Among them: persuading Arlington National Cemetery and other military cemeteries to bury members of the Women Airforce Service Pilots, female aviators in World War II, and getting Florida transportation officials to install barriers between roads and lakes, ponds and canals to reduce the number of crashes that result in drownings.

In the case of the Electoral College petition, Mr. Walton said the person who started it, Daniel Brezenoff, was able to generate widespread interest and raise more than $250,000 for his cause.

That a petition did not produce the desired outcome does not mean it failed, he added.

“Was he victorious? No,” Mr. Walton said, referring to Mr. Brezenoff. “Was he successful? I would say yes.”

Those who start a petition can deliver printed copies to the intended recipient. Those targeted do not receive emails every time a person signs, but they are often alerted by email that there is a petition directed at them.

The biggest benefit from a petition is raised awareness, Jason Del Gandio, a professor of communications and social movements at Temple University in Philadelphia, said in an interview. “In some ways it’s just the updated version of the letter-writing campaign to a representative that has been going on for years,” he said.

Successful petition drives do not exist in a vacuum, he added in an email.

“No president is going to do an about-face on a major policy because of 20,000 signatures,” he wrote. “But coupling that petition with other tactics like protests, rallies, phone calls, face-to-face lobbying, a well-organized media plan and community outreach creates an environment in which the goals of the signatories can become reality.”

Beyond seeking change, petitions serve other important functions, such as mobilizing supporters and reinforcing views, Gerald Benjamin, a political scientist and director of the Benjamin Center for Public Policy Initiatives at the State University of New York at New Paltz, said in an interview.

The effectiveness of a petition drive depends on how many signatures are collected, who is signing and whether those being petitioned are in a position to make changes, he said. A petition with 300 signatures, for instance, would carry greater weight if it was aimed at a city council member, who would have fewer constituents than a member of Congress.

Mr. Payne, who also worked as an organizer for NationBuilder.com, a software company that among other things helps clients gather supporters and donors, said congressional staff members knew that if petitioners did not get a response, they could take their case to the news media.

A decade ago, when he worked for Representative John Hall, a Democrat from the Hudson Valley, the office received 5,000 emails and letters a week. Online petitions can take that level of communication to a larger scale by amassing signatures quickly and easily.

“Congressional offices are seeing a river of mail coming into their offices,” Mr. Payne said. “Petitions add a garden hose to that.”

Digital petitions are popularly used to build databases of names, emails and phone numbers of those who can be called on to act or donate. “It’s moved from an organizing effort to an intelligence-gathering operation,” he said. That granular level of detail also allows organizations to direct ads to supporters on Facebook.

Jeb Ory, chief executive of Phone2Action, which relies on technology to help those who want to reach their lawmakers, said digital participation has helped amplify the voices of citizens.

“All it takes is a handful of tweets and Facebook posts for lawmakers to realize there are real people in the community who care about these issues,” he said. “I think technology has done an amazing job of making these decision-makers and policy-makers accessible to the average person.”