Half of Medication Errors Involve CPOE, Data Shows

Half of Medication Errors Involve CPOE, Data Shows

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/technology/half-medication-errors-involve-cpoe-data-shows?

Computerized prescriber order entry systems and pharmacy systems are the most commonly reported factors contributing to medication errors in Pennsylvania healthcare facilities, data shows.

Although health IT tools can help prevent patient safety problems, they can also lead to significant patient safety errors if they’re not used correctly, finds research from the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority.

Between January 1 and June 30, 2016, Pennsylvania healthcare facilities reported 889 medication-error events that indicated health IT as a contributing factor.

The most frequently reported errors included dose omission, wrong dose or overdosage, and extra dose. The most commonly reported systems involved in the errors were computerized prescriber order entry systems (CPOE) and the pharmacy systems.

“As more healthcare organizations adopted [EHR/EMRs (electronic health records systems)] and such systems became increasingly interoperable, the Authority observed an increase in reports of HIT-related events, particularly in relationship to medication errors.

In response, the Authority implemented additional event reporting questions that would better capture whether HIT was a contributing factor in reported events,” the Authority’s executive director,Regina Hoffman, said in a statement accompanying the report.

In 2015, a new question was added to the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) reporting form: “Did Health IT cause or contribute to this event?” opening a topic that had not been explored before, it says.

PA-PSRS is a web-based system that a secure, web-based system where healthcare facilities, including hospitals, ambulatory surgical facilities, and birthing centers, are required to submit reports of “serious events” and “incidents.”

What Went Wrong
PPSA analysts found that HIT-related errors occurred during every step of the medication use process. A majority of errors (69.2%) reached the patient. Just eight (0.9%) errors resulted in patient harm, though.

High-alert medications such as opioids, insulin, and anticoagulants, were three of the top five drug categories involved in reported events. More than one-third of all the reports involved medications on the ISMP List of High-Alert Medications in Acute Care Settings.

Of the 889 events, the three most commonly reported event types, aside from “other” (20.9%), were dose omission (13.8%), wrong dose/over dosage (10.9%), and extra dose (10.7%).

The most common cause of omissions was that the system did not work as expected or was offline and unavailable to clinicians. Among the reports classified as “other,” 22.6% were either a delay or omission in therapy.

How Things Went Wrong
The reporting form also allowed those reporting the incidents to choose which health IT tool was involved in the event. The analysis found that 50.4% of the reports listed the CPOE system as a contributing factor.

The pharmacy system (28.2%), electronic medication administration record system (28.1%), clinical documentation system (4.5%), and clinical decision support system (0.9%) were also mentioned, along with “other”/”unknown” (8.4%).

CPOE systems in particular were cited. They contributed to 59.3% of dose omissions, 55.8% of extra doses, and 52.6% of wrong dose/over dosage events. Pharmacy systems and electronic medication administration record systems were also frequent culprits in those events.

Communication issues within the EHR/EMR were also attributed to some of the errors, and most of those communication issues stemmed from a prescriber “free-texting instructions in the order comments field…and the contradictory instructions were overlooked by the pharmacist or nurse,” according to the report.

Could your favorite pain medicine send you into cardiac arrest?

Could your favorite pain medicine send you into cardiac arrest?

http://www.popsci.com/ibuprofen-pain-cardiac-arrest

Can popping a Motrin or Advil stop your heart? Possibly, according to a study published earlier this week in the European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy.

The study found that people who take certain Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (better known as NSAIDs) were more than 30 percent more likely to experience cardiac arrest. Although cardiac arrest and heart attacks are often used interchangeably, strictly speaking a cardiac arrest is when your heart stops beating—a heart attack is when oxygen is blocked from entering your heart, which often leads to cardiac arrest.

 
apothecary mortar and pestle

Pexels

 
 

Diclofenac, a prescription pain reliever often used for arthritis and migraines, and ibuprofen (often sold as Motrin and Ibuprofen in the United States) were the riskiest drugs, while Naproxen sodium (sold as Aleve) and the prescription pain reliever Celecoxib (sold as Celebrex) were the safest.

To assess each pain reliever’s relationship to cardiac arrests, Danish researchers pulled data from 28,947 Danish residents who’d experienced a cardiac arrest outside of a hospital from 2001 to 2010. Denmark, which has had universal healthcare since the 1960s, started the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry in 2001 in an attempt to reduce the number of cardiac arrests and improve patient outcomes. It contains the anonymized data of every cardiac arrest patient since the database’s inception. The research focused on out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) because people already in hospitals often have illnesses or other confounding factors that could cause their heart to stop.

Researchers used a technique known as the case-time-control method, that allows subjects to effectively function as their own control group.

“In that way we circumvent the problem with all kinds of confounders with diseases,” said lead study author Katharine B. Sondergaard. “Do they smoke? Are they obese? Do they have hypertension? All of these kinds of things we can’t control are eliminated because the patient controls himself.”

To rule out whether any correlative effects were related to say, a new drug being used more often, the study authors put together a control group of 115,788 participants from the Danish Patient Registry that were demographically similar to the case group, then put them through the same analysis. They then used statistical analysis to compare the two groups.

While they found that use of any NSAIDs increased the overall risk of cardiac arrest, not all NSAIDs were equally dangerous. Diclofenac was associated with a 50 percent increase in risk, while ibuprofen was associated with a 31 percent increase. Aspirin, which is an NSAID that’s thought to be heart-friendly because of its blood thinning effect, was not included in the study.

It’s important to note that these drugs only increase a person’s underlying risk. If a patient had a two percent chance of a cardiac arrest before taking diclofenac, the drug would only increase their total risk to three percent. But this isn’t the first study to suggest that there could be a link between NSAIDs and heart ailments, or even stroke.

“And the problem,” said Sondergaard, “is that for a lot of people, a cardiac arrest is their first symptom of heart disease. You could be walking around with a heart disease and you don’t know it until you suddenly have a cardiac arrest.” So you might not realize that you’re at high risk of cardiac arrest when you start popping pills.

 
girl face in pain

Britt-Knee via Flickr

It’s scary to think that the drugs we routinely turn to for safe pain relief might actually make us sick. There are strong parallels to the realization a few years ago that acetaminophen (aka Tylenol) can cause spontaneous liver failure at relatively low doses or when mixed with alcohol.

That’s why Sondergaard thinks that people should have a doctor examine them before they start taking NSAID’s. That said, because of their anti-inflammatory effects, NSAIDs in particular are often a go-to drug for women dealing with menstrual cramps. Because menstruating women are generally young and healthy, a couple of ibuprofen for a day or two are unlikely to stop their heart. But they should take less than 1200mg a day, and should avoid taking them for more than a day or two. Earlier studies on heart attacks found that people developed symptoms after as a little as a week on NSAIDs, but the fact remains that risk is lower for younger people.

Still, Sondergaard said, “You don’t have to take it on an everyday basis to be at risk from the drug.”

And even the drugs deemed safe in this particular study aren’t necessarily harmless. For example, people who took reofecoxib didn’t have an uptick in cardiac arrests. But in the United States, reofecoxib—sold as Vioxx—was pulled from the market in 2004. Its manufacturers had found that chronic use could cause heart attack (which differs from cardiac arrest) and even stroke.

The takeaway? Get regular check-ups to keep tabs on your heart health, know your personal risk factors, and don’t mindlessly take medication just because it didn’t require a prescription.

“When you sell these drugs in supermarkets and stuff,” said Sondergaard, “you signal that it’s a safer drug that you can take without risk. And that’s just not the truth.”

Meeting March 22, 2017 9:00PM

livesupportgroup.com/join-us/

You need to “sign up” to get weblink sent to you to join into the discussion

American Kratom Association Urges Local Authorities To Stop Unscientific Attacks On Kratom

American Kratom Association Urges Local Authorities To Stop Unscientific Attacks On Kratom

https://www.yahoo.com/news/american-kratom-association-urges-local-authorities-stop-unscientific-150000828.html

WASHINGTON, March 16, 2017 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Even though the case for banning or scheduling kratom has been debunked, there continue to be a number of unwarranted warnings about the coffee-like botanical coming from city, county and state agencies across the United States.  In calling for a halt to these unscientific attacks on kratom, the American Kratom Association today issued a new fact-versus-fiction infographic at http://tinyurl.com/gvwbsk5.

The local and state warnings appear to be an outgrowth of the one or more briefings conducted last fall by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) with police and health officials across the United States. The AKA has learned of the DEA briefing or briefings, which were held before the point in time when the federal agency put on hold its plan to schedule kratom as an illegal drug.

To date, AKA has uncovered unfounded anti-kratom warnings issued by the Floyd County Police Department in Georgia, the Winchester (VA) Police Department, the Oxford (AL) Police Department, the City of Denver, and the Utah Poison Control Center. Though the City of Denver backed off its initial kratom ban, it has not withdrawn its related public health warning. The Utah agency has gone so far as to label kratom incorrectly as a “toxin.”

To address any remaining pockets of anti-kratom hysteria, the new AKA fact-versus-fiction infographic seeks to set the record straight by focusing on such key facts as the following:

  • 1,175 doctors, veterans, scientists and law enforcement officers told the DEA they don’t want a kratom ban.
  • 0 percent of emergency health care professionals (including nurses and surgeons) responding to an online survey favored a ban on kratom.
  • Zero deaths have been proven to be caused by kratom.
  • One of the world’s leading experts on drug abuse and addiction says kratom has no more potential for “substance use disorder” than caffeine.  Chamomile, St John’s Wort, and nutmeg are dietary supplements that are comparable to kratom in terms of their potential for addiction.
  • Kratom consumers report that the botanical supplement is consumed for many things, including the management of minor pain and to promote a sense of health and well-being.

American Kratom Association Director Susan Ash said: “We are calling for state and local officials to recognize that the DEA backed away from its move to ban kratom after being faced with substantial public opposition and expert testimony that such a scheduling move is unjustified.  As such, it is time to end the ‘Reefer Madness’-style attacks on this coffee-like botanical that is used responsibly by myself and three-five million other Americans.  It’s not as though these officials don’t have real problems to deal with today.  We have a real opioid epidemic unfolding in this country.  Federal, state, and local officials would be much better off focusing on that bona fide public health crisis, instead of trying to stoke unfounded fears about an imaginary ‘kratom problem’.”

The American Kratom Association is proud to be playing an instrumental role in helping to coordinate the broad-based national opposition to the DEA’s attempt to effectively ban kratom:

ABOUT AKA

The America Kratom Association, a consumer-based non-profit organization, is here to set the record straight, giving a voice to those suffering and protecting our rights to possess and consume kratom. AKA represents tens of thousands of Americans, each of whom has a unique story to tell about the virtues of kratom and its positive effects on their lives. www.americankratom.org

 

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/american-kratom-association-urges-local-authorities-to-stop-unscientific-attacks-on-kratom-300424855.html

Sessions: ‘We don’t need to be legalizing marijuana’

Two years after the DEA admitted marijuana is less dangerous than heroin, Jeff Sessions would like to reconsider

Less than two years after the Drug Enforcement Administration officially admitted that “heroin is clearly more dangerous than marijuana,” new Attorney General Jeff Sessions revisited that comparison in remarks today before law enforcement officials in Richmond:

I reject the idea that America will be a better place if marijuana is sold in every corner store. And I am astonished to hear people suggest that we can solve our heroin crisis by legalizing marijuana — so people can trade one life-wrecking dependency for another that’s only slightly less awful. Our nation needs to say clearly once again that using drugs will destroy your life.

Sessions remarks are contradicted by a wealth of medical and policy research.

For starters, researchers and policymakers aren’t suggesting that marijuana legalization will “solve” the heroin crisis. As I noted late last month, there is, however, abundant, peer-reviewed evidence suggesting that legalizing medical marijuana has led to decreases in opioid overdose and mortality rates in a number of states.

Sessions: ‘We don’t need to be legalizing marijuana’

Expressing his views on drug policy, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said marijuana legalization wouldn’t be “good for us.” He also doubted reports of marijuana’s effectiveness fighting opioid addiction, adding “we need to crack down more on heroin.” (Reuters)

And my list is already out-of-date: A new report published in the journal Drug and Alcohol Dependence last month found opioid hospitalizations decreased in states that allowed medical marijuana. Furthermore, those states saw no increase in the incidence of marijuana-related hospitalizations.

That speaks to Sessions’s second point: that marijuana dependency is “only slightly less awful” than heroin addiction. Drug dependency of any kind is, indeed, awful. And marijuana dependency is quite real.

But there is a spectrum of “awful”-ness of drug dependency, and evidence and common sense suggest marijuana and heroin are miles apart. For starters, heroin is lethal and kills 13,000 of its users each year. Nobody ODs on marijuana alone.

Second, the federal government’s own research undermines any equivalency between dependency on marijuana and heroin. You can often gauge how bad a given drug addiction is by looking at what happens when a user tries to kick the habit. For heroin, the National Institute on Drug Abuse lists withdrawal symptoms including “muscle and bone pain, sleep problems, diarrhea and vomiting, cold flashes with goose bumps, uncontrollable leg movements severe heroin cravings.”

Heroin withdrawal is so bad that users occasionally die from it, particularly in harsh criminal justice environments where they’re unable to receive medical care.

For marijuana, on the other hand, major withdrawal symptoms include “grouchiness, sleeplessness, decreased appetite, anxiety cravings.”

Grouchiness and decreased appetite seem far — not “slightly” — less awful than severe pain and possible death.

Finally, researchers have generally ranked marijuana use as far less harmful to individuals and society than heroin use. In a 2010 Lancet report, dozens of researchers and public health experts rated the harm potential of a variety of drugs on a 0 to 100 scale, with 100 being the most harmful. Heroin scored in the mid-50s. Marijuana was rated at a 20.

Sessions’s remarks are “a sort of starting gun for a new war on drugs,” according to Michael Collins of the Drug Policy Alliance, a group working to reform drug laws. “It’s very disappointing that this DOJ and this attorney general are so anti-science and anti-evidence and anti-facts.”

How marijuana legalization in Washington, Colorado and Oregon is working out so far

 

Voters in California, Maine, Massachusetts and Nevada just approved recreational marijuana use. Here’s what they can learn from Washington, Colorado and Oregon, states where marijuana use has already been legalized. (Daron Taylor, Danielle Kunitz/The Washington Post)

14 million will lose healthcare coverage

It is amazing that everyone in the media and many in Congress has their “shorts in a wad”.. all based on a CBO projection whose estimates have been way off the mark previously, especially when they under estimated the cost of ACA(Obamacare) by ONE TRILLION DOLLARS.

Of course, even with the implementation of the ACA we had some THIRTY MILLION that still does not have health insurance.

They have claimed that 36,000 thousand/yr could die if ACA is repealed https://thinkprogress.org/heres-how-many-people-could-die-every-year-if-obamacare-is-repealed-ae4bf3e100a2#.gyr66uwt4

A recent survey released by Pain News Network   Survey Finds CDC Opioid Guidelines Harming Patients    that one year after the CDC opiate dosing guidelines, 70% of chronic pain pts have had their pain medication reduced or eliminated by their prescriber.

No media wide OUTRAGE… exploring all the millions of acute and chronic pain pts that would not receive adequate medical care ?  No estimated “death toll”.

Does this suggest that those with acute/chronic pain are really just considered “second class citizens” ?

 

over 70 percent of pain patients say they are no longer prescribed opioid medication or are getting a lower dose

Survey Finds CDC Opioid Guidelines Harming Patients

www.painnewsnetwork.org/stories/2017/3/13/survey-finds-cdc-opioid-guidelines-harming-patients

The CDC’s opioid prescribing guidelines have harmed pain patients, reduced access to pain care, and failed to reduce drug abuse and overdoses, according to a large new survey of patients, doctors and healthcare providers. The survey also found signs of a dramatic shift away from opioid prescribing over the past year.

Today marks the one-year anniversary of the guidelines, which discourage the prescribing of opioid medication for chronic pain. The guidelines are meant to be voluntary and only intended for primary care physicians, but are being widely implemented throughout the U.S. healthcare system and are having many unintended consequences.

According to the survey, over 70 percent of pain patients say they are no longer prescribed opioid medication or are getting a lower dose. While reducing opioid prescriptions may have been the ultimate goal of the guidelines, it came with a heavy price: Eight out of ten patients say their pain and quality of life are worse. Many are having suicidal thoughts, and some are hoarding opioids or turning to illegal drugs for pain relief.

“I had a doctor pull me off methadone cold turkey after taking it successfully for 15 years for no reason other than the CDC’s guidelines. I was in the worst pain of my life,” said one patient.

“The CDC needs to stop practicing medicine without a license. They are hurting more chronic pain patients than they are helping,” said another.

“These guidelines are so incredibly wrong. People are already suffering, myself included. And it’s going to get so much worse,” predicted one patient.

“The ‘War on Drugs’ has devolved into a war on patients,” wrote a primary care doctor. “The government should spend its time, effort, and money on research to find a pain treatment with fewer harmful effects than narcotics and butt out of the doctor-patient relationship.”

HOW HAVE THE CDC GUIDELINES AFFECTED YOUR OPIOID PRESCRIPTIONS?

 
  • 23% OPIOID PRESCRIPTIONS STOPPED
  • 48% LOWER DOSE
  • 24% SAME DOSE
  • 2% HIGHER DOSE
  • 3% DO NOT USE OPIOIDS
 

The online survey of 3,108 pain patients, 43 doctors and 235 other healthcare providers was conducted between February 15 and March 11 by Pain News Network and the International Pain Foundation (iPain).

“This survey shows that patients and providers are in agreement about the harm the guidelines have caused since their release last year,” said Barby Ingle, president of iPain. “When we have government agencies or insurance companies impose poor practices on the pain community, we see failure. A failure to stop abuse and overdoses, hoarding behaviors by well-intentioned patients, increased use of illegal drugs and, worst of all, suicides increase.”

There was broad agreement between patients, doctors and healthcare providers that the guidelines have been harmful to patients. When asked if the guidelines had improved the quality of pain care in the United States, over 90 percent said no.

“I have been on a high dose of opioids for twenty years. I was having a quality of life and enjoyed living. Now I want to die every day. I am in excruciating pain and have no quality of life. I am on more drugs than ever and all I want is to die,” said a patient..

“Not only do I have less pain relief but I am not able to be as active and am sad and frustrated about that. Something has to change, what’s happening is not sane or humane,” wrote a fibromyalgia sufferer.

HAVE THE CDC GUIDELINES IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF PAIN CARE?

 
  • 90% NO
  • 3% YES
  • 7% DON’T KNOW
 

Eight out of ten respondents said the guidelines have not been successful in reducing opioid abuse and overdoses. That view is supported by recent reports showing that opioid overdoses are soaring around the country, and are now being driven primarily by heroin and illicit fentanyl, not prescription painkillers. 

Some patients admit they are turning to the black market for pain relief.

“Eleven of the 36 people in my support group have admitted using illegally obtained pain medication. Three of those have resorted to heroin because it is cheaper,” one patient said.

“I was able to find illegal sources of medication. However, the prices are high. I have been trying to avoid heroin but I may have to make a switch in the future if I don’t find another doctor to manage my pain,” said another patient.

“My pain clinic sent a letter to all of their patients stating they would no longer prescribe opiates,” said a patient. “No other practice would accept me in the area so I have been able to obtain my former meds through the black market. The prices are high and I am tempted to move to heroin as it’s much less expensive.”

HAVE THE CDC GUIDELINES BEEN SUCCESSFUL IN REDUCING OPIOID ABUSE AND OVERDOSES?

 
  • 84% NO
  • 3% YES
  • 13% DON’T KNOW
 

“I have found a source of illegal hydrocodone that I have been testing (making sure not laced with fentanyl) in extremely small does. If that turns out clean I will move to the black market for my drugs since it will end up cheaper,” another patient wrote.

Over the past year, patients reported many negative consequences from the guidelines, with very few positive outcomes – such as finding safer and more effective treatments.

  • 84% say they have more pain and worse quality of life
  • 42% have considered suicide because their pain is poorly treated
  • 22% are hoarding opioids because they’re not sure of future access
  • 20% say insurance refused to pay for a pain treatment they needed
  • 19% say a pharmacy refused to fill their opioid prescription
  • 11% have obtained opioids illegally for pain relief
  •   4% found better and safer treatment than opioids
  •   4% were given a referral for addiction treatment
  •   4% were discharged by a doctor for failing a drug test
  •   1% found that they don’t really need opioids

Suicidal thoughts and an increasing sense of desperation were common in many of the patient’s answers.

“My neighbor poured gasoline over her head and set herself on fire and died because she could not get any pain relief. To me it’s the same as taking chemo and radiation away from a cancer patient,” said one patient.

“Should be very careful who they kick off meds. A friend hung himself in the bathroom, another lost his job and went homeless. I live in fear,” said another.

“People are killing themselves because their chronic pain isn’t being treated, and I become closer and closer to being one of those people,” wrote another patient.

“So far I have lost three friends with chronic pain to suicide. I bet the CDC sees that as a win. Three less people to deal with. Bullets are cheaper than dealing with their chronic pain. It’s become a joke,” a patient said.

To see the complete survey results, click here.

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe is expected to sign the handful of marijuana-related bills

McAuliffe expected to sign marijuana reforms

http://www.vagazette.com/news/va-vg-cns-pot-laws-0315-20170315-story.html

RICHMOND – Virginia probably will ease up a bit in its laws against marijuana by making it easier for epilepsy patients to obtain cannabis extract oils and by relaxing the penalty for people caught with small amounts of marijuana.

Gov. Terry McAuliffe is expected to sign the handful of marijuana-related bills passed by the General Assembly during its recent session. They include SB 1027, which will allow Virginia pharmacies to make and sell marijuana extract oils for treating intractable epilepsy, and HB 2051 and SB 1091, which will eliminate the state’s punishment of automatically suspending the driver’s license of adults convicted of simple marijuana possession.

Currently, it is illegal in Virginia to purchase THC-A or CBD oils. In 2015, the General Assembly carved out one exception – for people who suffer from intractable epilepsy. Epilepsy patients and their caregivers are allowed to possess the marijuana extract oils. But they face problems buying the medication.

SB 1027, sponsored by Sen. David Marsden, D-Fairfax, will allow “pharmaceutical processors” – after obtaining a permit from the state Board of Pharmacy and under the supervision of a licensed pharmacist – to grow low-THC cannabis, manufacture the oil and then provide it to epilepsy patients who have a written certification from a doctor.

“Virginia will only be the second state in the nation that has this type of program, the first being Missouri,” said Maggie Ellinger-Locke, legislative counsel for the Marijuana Policy Project, which advocates liberalizing marijuana laws.

“It’s a far cry from an effective medical marijuana program, but it’s still a step in the right direction.”

Ellinger-Locke said 28 states and the District of Columbia have full-fledged programs in which people with cancer, glaucoma and other diseases can get a prescription to use marijuana.

Marsden’s bill includes an emergency clause. So when the governor signs it, the law will take effect immediately.

Del. Les. Adams, R-Chatham, and Sen. Adam Ebbin, D-Alexandria, carried the measures regarding driver’s licenses. Under the legislation, which would take effect July 1, judges will have the discretion to suspend the license of an adult convicted of marijuana possession – but the penalty would not be automatic. Juveniles would still be subject to an automatic six-month suspension of their driver’s license.

Ellinger-Locke said the laws are in step with reforms happening across the country.

“We are optimistic,” she said. “The polling shows that Virginians desperately want their marijuana policy changed and laws reformed in some capacity, and I think that lawmakers are starting to hear the call in Virginia as well as throughout the U.S.”

Those calls went largely unheeded during the 2017 legislative session, as about a dozen proposals, ranging from establishing a medical marijuana program to decriminalizing marijuana possession, failed.

For example, Sen. Jill Holtzman Vogel of Winchester introduced bills to make marijuana products available to people with cancer, AIDS, Alzheimer’s, multiple sclerosis and several other diseases (SB 1298) and to create a pilot program for farmers to grow hemp (SB 1306). Both bills cleared the Senate but died in the House.

Marijuana likely will be an issue in statewide elections this year. Vogel, who is seeking the Republican nomination for lieutenant governor, has vowed to be an advocate for medical marijuana.

“It has no psychotropic effects, and no one is dealing it on the illicit market. For the people that are sick and really wanted the bill to pass, it was heartbreaking,” Vogel said. “I think this is a little bit of bias and a little bit of lack of education … The overwhelming majority of the voting public believes having access to that kind of medication is very helpful.”

Medical marijuana bills faced opposition from legislators afraid that expansion may become a slippery slope. Sen. Dick Black, R-Loudoun, recalled returning from serving in the Marines in Vietnam in the 1960s when, he said, marijuana use caused a collapse of “good order and discipline.”

DEA Grown Marijuana Looks Like Oregano & Fails Mold, Yeast & Lead Tests

shit weedDEA Grown Marijuana Looks Like Oregano & Fails Mold, Yeast & Lead Tests

www.thesmokersclub.com/news/dea-grown-marijuana-looks-like-oregano-fails-mold-yeast-lead-tests/

Since 1970, the University of Mississippi has been growing government-funded weed for medical/clinical studies on cannabis. Turns out: that “weed” looks more like oregano than actual weed!

These pics are actually real life. Last April, the government handed Dr. Sue Sisley a $2 million grant to study medical marijuana’s effect on PTSD. Sisley got that weed delivered last fall–but then she saw the weed looked like this aka nothing anyone who smokes weed in this millennium has ever touched:

So she sent that weed for lab tests–tests that promptly found levels of yeast, mold, and lead in the samples:

“It didn’t resemble cannabis. It didn’t smell like cannabis,” Sisley says. What’s more, laboratory testing found that some of the samples were contaminated with mold, while others didn’t match the chemical potency Sisley had requested for the study.

There’s only one source of marijuana for clinical research in the United States. And “they weren’t able to produce what we were asking for,” Sisley says. [PBS]

Long story short, Sisley ended up giving this weed to veterans with PTSD in mid-January. She didn’t exactly have a choice: she can’t substitute real high-grade weed for this crap (8% THC!) and keep her grant or have the grant be used for an actual medical study.

But anyone that’s ever seen Half Baked let along smoked a doobie knows that these two things are not alike:

                     Medical Marijuana                                            Government “Marijuana”

IMG_2955

Talcum powder. Oregano. Schwag. Brick weed. Butt hair. Whatever you want to call it, Sisley is right: this stuff isn’t what anyone should be smoking–let alone our government using to base clinical studies on marijuana that might determine the plant’s medical value for the future.

It’s embarrassing that the effing government–with all that money–grows worse weed than most people grow in their closets. It’s an abortion.

Maybe NIDA (National Institute on Drug Abuse) and the DEA hired a Mexican cartel to oversee their program because this looks far more like Mexican brick weed than it does high-grade medical marijuana.

I’ve smoked a lot of weed in my day, and I haven’t smoked weed that looks like this does…maybe ever. Sure, in high school or in Mexico I smoked some suspect, stemmy/seedy plant…but it’s been at least a decade since I saw anything that came close to this level of pathetic.

Note to the DEA: hire a real grower!

 

Tucker wants questions to ask Trump on Wednesday night !!!

https://www.facebook.com/TuckerCarlsonTonight/?fref=nf

Posts

Tucker interviews President Donald J. Trump on Wednesday. What would you ask? Tell us your questions below!