If we can’t save the patient, the patient doesn’t matter

Why Some Hospitals Are Allowing Unnecessary Suffering

http://www.alternet.org/story/85637/why_some_hospitals_are_allowing_unnecessary_suffering

“His heart filled virtually his whole chest,” recalls Dr. Diane Meier describing her very first patient, an 89-year-old suffering from end-stage congestive heart failure. 

It was the first day of Meier’s internship at a hospital in Portland Oregon, and after being assigned 23 patients, she was suddenly told that one of her patients, who had been in the Intensive Care Unit for months, was “coding.” She raced to the ICU where the resident told her to put in a “central line.”

“I didn’t know how,” Meier admits.  “I felt overwhelmed and inadequate. Then, the patient died …

“Everyone just walked out of the room,” she remembers.  I stood there. I still sometimes flash back on that scene: the patient, naked, lying on the table, strips of paper everywhere, the room empty. This was my patient. I felt I was supposed to do something — but I didn’t know what.”

Meier left the room and, in the hallway, saw the patient’s wife. “I walked right past her,” she recalls, nearly shuddering at her own cowardice.  I didn’t know what to say. I didn’t even say ‘I’m sorry.’ As a physician, I didn’t think that I was supposed to do that. “

I heard Dr. Diane Meier tell this story at a conference for medical students at  Manhattan’s Mt. Sinai School of Medicine last week. When she finished, she asked her audience, “What is the hidden curriculum here? What does this story tell you?’

“Once the patient dies, he no longer matters,” said one student.

“If we can’t save the patient, the patient doesn’t matter,” added another.

Meier drew a third lesson: “Before he died, this patient had spent two months in the ICU. We had done everything possible to prolong the dying process.”  As a doctor, you have to step back and say, ‘What is this experience telling me, and is this right?'”

As a palliative care specialist, Meier spends much of her time with dying patients.  For many, “palliative care” offers a middle road between pulling out all the stops and simply giving up hope. Like traditional “hospice” care, palliative care focuses on “comfort” rather than “cure,” emphasizing pain management and easing the emotional trauma of facing death, both for the patient and for the family.  But palliative care also includes procedures aimed at treating the symptoms of the disease.

In the past, Meier explains, physicians have seen caring for a terminally ill patient as an “either/or” situation: “Either we are doing everything possible to try to prolong your life — or when there is ‘nothing more that we can do,’ only then do we make the switch to providing comfort measures. This dichotomous notion — that you can do one thing alone and then the other thing alone later — has nothing to do with the reality of what patients and their families go through.”

In her talk last week, Meier explained that her first patient was one of three who marked turning points on her life as a physician. Originally, she trained to become a geriatrician, a doctor who cares for people over 65.  “I think because I was very close to my grandfather,” she explained, “and because I’m a ‘lumper’ not a ‘splitter’,” she added, referring to the distinction between doctors who prefer to treat the whole patient, head to toe, and those who prefer to specialize in a body part: the foot, for example, or the eye.’

Her interest in treating the elderly brought her to Mt. Sinai, which, at the time, had the only Department of Geriatrics in the country.  But as her career unfolded, she found herself “become more and more alienated from medicine. Here, in the hospital, everyone was running around, ostensibly trying to help the patient, but actually often hurting the patient. I thought about quitting. I had a fantasy of opening a bakery/book shop where I could read and eat brownies …” she told the med students.

“Then I met a patient I will call Mr. Santanaya.”

Meier first encountered Santanaya when she was walking down a hospital hallway and  heard a man screaming and moaning in pain. She looked into his room and there he was, pinioned to his bed, hand and foot, in “four-point restraint.”

“I went to the nurse and asked, ‘Why is this man in a four-point restraint?”  The nurse called for the intern.

“I’ll never forget this kid’s face,” Meier recalled “To me, he looked about twelve years old. And terrified.

Meier asked the question again,  and the intern explained: “He has lung cancer that spread to his brain and he’s delirious. We put a feeding tube up into his nose and down to his stomach, and he pulled it out. So we tied his hands. Then he pulled it out with his knees and feet — so we tied his knees and feet.”

“The feeding tube is very uncomfortable,” Meier told the students. “It makes the nose and esophagus raw. I asked the intern, ‘Why do we have to do this?'”

“He looked at me with tremendous distress in his eyes: ‘Because if we don’t, he’ll die.”

“I realized he didn’t know any better,” said Meier.  “Neither did the resident or the attending physician. I realized that this was an educational problem.

“They cared about the patient. This wasn’t callousness or indifference or venality.  They just didn’t know when too much is too little.” So Mr. Santayana spent 33 days tied hand and foot to his bed before he died. He spoke no English, but during that time, he kept screaming “Ayudeme! Ayudeme!” (Help Me! Help Me!)

Why didn’t Mr. Santayana’s physician intervene to do something to help him? “He didn’t have a primary care physician because he was on Medicaid,” Meier explained. So it was left to the hospital staff, and not knowing what else to do, they simply followed procedure.

“This was the early 1990s, and that is when I decided to shift my career to try to make up for what happened to Mr. Santayana,” said Meier.  Then she got lucky.

Dr. Robert Butler, founder of gerontology at Mount Sinai, and  a friend of George Soros, urged her to apply for funding from Soros’s newly formed Project on Death in America. Meier and three colleagues won the funding and in 1995, with help from Soros and the United Hospital Fund, launched the Hertzberg Palliative Care Institute at Mount Sinai School of Medicine. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation also invested in developing content.  In 1999 Meier and Dr. Christine Cassel founded the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC) .  As a result of CAPC’s program, by 2005, the number of hospital-based palliative care programs in the U.S. had roughly doubled to 1,240, and some 3,100 health care professionals had been taught CAPC’s methods and ethics.

The third patient who Meier told the students about last week  is a 24-year-old who she called “Kate.” Kate had just graduated from college and had worked and saved enough money to go to Australia. There she developed the worst headache of her life. “She called her mother from Sydney and her mother came to get her,” Meier told her audience. “In retrospect, she might have been better off if she had stayed in Australia.”

The problem was that Kate had no health insurance.  She was only 24 and she thought she didn’t need insurance.

Her mother brought her directly from the airport to Mt. Sinai, “where she was admitted directly to the oncology service, not to a doctor,” Meier explains. Like Mr. Santayana, she would be on Medicaid and so wouldn’t have her own doctor. Kate was diagnosed with leukemia.

“I met Kate on day 7 when a consult called me to say that they had a manipulative drug-seeking patient with acute myeloid leukemia,” Meier recalled. “By then, Kate had earned the contempt and hostility of the house staff because she was constantly screaming for pain-killers.

“It turned out that no one knew the half-life of the opiate they were giving her — not the attending physician, not the resident, not the intern.”

Meier then turned to her audience, made up largely of second-year medical students. “Does anyone here know the half-life,” she asked, naming the pain-killer.

No one did. (The half-life of a pain-killer tells you how long it will be before it wears off.)

“What they were giving her provided relief for only 90 minutes,” said Meier, “and they were giving it to her every six hours.”  After 90 minutes , Kate would begin ringing for nurse. Then, after a half hour, when no one came, she would begin ringing more and more frantically, and finally begin screaming. “Between four and six hours, she would just be screaming,” said Meier.

This had been going on for seven days.  “The pain specialists wouldn’t see her because she had no insurance.”

“I doubled the dose and ordered that it be given to Kate every three hours, around the clock,” said Meyer. “And before long, she was transformed into the sweet, charming intelligent person she always had been.”

“Kate had become the victim of iatrogenic pseudo-addiction,” Meier added. She wasn’t an addict, but she was behaving like an addict and seemed like an addict — a pseudo-addiction created by her doctors, which makes it an “iatrogenic disease,” an illness caused, inadvertently, by medical care. 

Why hadn’t her mother tried to persuade the doctors to give her more pain-killers? “Kate was the middle child in an Irish family of seven kids and one of her brothers had become addicted to drugs. As a result, the mother was terrified of opiates,”  said Meier. “The palliative care team had to spend time with the parent, explaining that pain kills.

The only possible hope for Kate was a bone marrow transplant. Because she was on Medicaid, this would be very hard to get. “It took six weeks of begging to get someone to take her,” Meier recalled. “And then the transplant failed.

“While she was dying, Kate told us that the worst part of the experience had been those first six days when she was labeled a ‘manipulative drug addict.’ She was marginalized because her doctors did not know how to administer the opiates.

“Untreated pain is a medical emergency,” Meier told the students. “The reason no one here knew the half-life of that opiate is because learning about pain-killers is not a priority in medical curriculums.” In fairness, this is the sort of thing that doctors on the ward often look up. But in this case, no one even tried to look it up.

“The relief of suffering is a fundamental part of medicine,” Meier concluded. “In this country there is a tremendous amount of stigma associated with opiates. When you are caring for patients, and you leave an order for the  nurse to administer the pain-killers, remember, there’s a real chance that she’ll think, ‘This is dangerous. I don’t want something bad to happen on my shift.  Okay, I’ll give it to you — but I won’t give you enough.’

“This is why pain is so poorly managed in this country.”

In Italy, by contrast, a patient dying of cancer is often sent home, with morphine, to die in his own bed. His wife administers the morphine and she is given enough to keep him as much as he wants — when he wants it.   In the U.K., where hospice care was invented in the 1960s, there are many more palliative care specialists than in the U.S. 

Here, medicine is all about “cure,” not about “care.” “Defeating death at any cost: that is the priority,” Meier told me. “It comes ahead of reducing suffering or considering the quality of the patient’s life. If you look at NIH funding,” she pointed out, “you see that this is where the money goes — to cure cancer, to prevent all heart disease and stroke.”

This is not to say that Meier favors cutting back on end-of-life care because it is so expensive and so much money is “squandered” during the final year of a patient’s life. “The problem is, of course, that we don’t know who is in their last year — or their final three months,” Meier observed.  “The fact that we spend so much on these patients in their final months of life is not necessarily a bad thing,” she added. “These are the sickest people in the hospital, who need the most care. We shouldn’t say: ‘We’re wasting money on the dying.’ But,” she added , “we should be asking, ‘Is this the best care? Is it appropriate care?”

Clearly, we need more palliative care specialists like Meier. But this is another case where we don’t pay enough for “thinking medicine” — which involves talking to and listening to the patient — rather than cutting him or radiating him.

“When a three-person palliative care team made up of a doctor, a nurse and a psychologist spends 90 minutes in a meeting with a family, Medicare would probably pay $130 to $140 — for all three people,” Meier told me. “And Medicare is one of the better payers. This explains why Meier earns $100 for every several thousand dollars that her husband, an invasive cardiologist, takes home. “Though,” Meier said mildly, “it would be hard to say that one of us is practicing more sophisticated medicine.”

There Have Been Fewer Pharmacy Robberies in Indiana – HALF TRUTHS ?

U.S. Attorney: There Have Been Fewer Pharmacy Robberies in Indiana

http://www.wibc.com/news/local-news/us-attorney-there-have-been-fewer-pharmacy-robberies-indiana

In 2015 Indiana had more pharmacy robberies than any other state. That has changed.

INDIANAPOLIS–Pharmacy robberies have gone down drastically in the past three years. That may be thanks to a decision to prosecute people who rob pharmacies in the state in federal court and to send them to federal prison.

“Every defendant that commits a crime of pharmacy robbery in the Southern District of Indiana, will be charged in federal court and will face the hammer of federal sentencing,” said Josh Minkler, U.S. attorney, describing a decision that was made three years ago, with help from the Indianapolis Metro Police Dept. and Marion County authorities.

“Indiana led the nation in pharmacy robberies, most of those robberies occurring here in Marion County.”

But, not any more. Minkler described the stats, beginning in 2015.

“In 2015, there were 168 pharmacy robberies in Indiana, 129 of those occurring in Marion County. In 2016, there were 78 pharmacy robberies in the State of Indiana, 42 of those occurring in Marion County. Thus far in 2017, there have been only 10 pharmacy robberies in the State of Indiana, only five of those occurring in Marion County.”

Minkler talked about the stats during a news conference this week where he announced the indictment of a gang called “The Mob” that his office said robbed pharmacies, sold the prescription pills and used young people to do the dirty work.

They also used social media to intimidate neighbors.

Minkler said his office has been working with law enforcement throughout Indiana to round up the robbers.

“The name of this operation was ‘Operation: Pharm Aid’.” He said over the past two years they have arrested and prosecuted 36 people for 62 pharmacy robberies.

Robbing a pharmacy when controlled substances are involved has been a FEDERAL CRIME – the same as robbing a bank… since the mid-early 70’s and it took INDIANA  abt FORTY YEARS  to figure out that maybe they should use this federal laws..

No mention of the increased illegal Fentanyl analogs & Heroin on the street and opiate OD’s in Indiana and the 200+ people that were diagnosed with HIV+,Hep B&C in the small Scott county a couple of years ago because Indiana has been reluctant to create a “clean needle program”…

While the Legislature passed laws that it is damn near impossible to purchase Sudafed .. which they claim has reduced the number of Meth labs in the state… but.. don’t mention the amount of Meth that is sold on the street.. since 80% of the Meth sold in the USA is produced in Mexico.

The “picture” that these bureaucrats are putting forth is like a puzzle with a lot of pieces of the puzzle missing… so that no one can see the entire picture CLEARLY !!!

 

 

 

The Deepening Opioid Crisis Among Native Americans

The Deepening Opioid Crisis Among Native Americans

thecrimereport.org/2017/05/24/the-deepening-opioid-crisis-among-native-americans/

The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma has launched a lawsuit against three national retail pharmacy chains and two of the largest national drug distributors in the country. The complaint charges that they knowingly flooded the tribal community with prescription opioids, fueling a deadly drug epidemic that has taken hundreds of lives and cost hundreds of millions of dollars.

The landmark lawsuit, filed on April 20, 2017, contends that retailers Walmart, CVS and Walgreens, and wholesalers AmerisourceBergen, McKesson, and Cardinal Health, “allowed massive amounts of opioid pills to be diverted from legitimate channels of distribution into the illicit black market in quantities that have fueled the opioid epidemic in the Cherokee Nation.

 The suit alleges the defendants ignored red flags and “turned a blind eye” to known problems in their supply chains. Todd Hembree, the Cherokee Nation Attorney General, said the drug companies failed to keep their opioids from being diverted and did nothing to prevent rampant over-prescribing.

The rate of drug-related deaths among American Indian and Alaska Native people has quadrupled since 1999 and is double the rate of the country as a whole. The diversion of millions of opioid pills over the past 18 years has contributed to nearly 400 deaths among the Cherokee Nation – double the death rate of the country at large – and 10,000 hospital visits.

 Actions like the Cherokee suit can be expensive—especially if you lose and have to cover the legal expenses.

Despite this, considering the social destruction that prescription opioids have caused the American Indian and Alaska Native populations, it’s possible we will see other tribal nations follow with their own lawsuits.

The reason: there’s strength in numbers.

Similar lawsuits have snowballed among cities, counties and states, where opioid addiction has cost taxpayers and citizens billions of dollars. From coast to coast, they’ve come to the same conclusion: Drug companies are complicit in the opioid epidemic, and they need to be held accountable.

The combined pressure is starting to have an effect. Recent federal cases against drug companies show that lobbyists and armies of lawyers are getting companies off rather lightly.

“They pay fines as a cost of doing business in an industry which generates billions of dollars in revenue,” the Cherokee suit says.

Light fines and no jail time helps fuel the problem. The industry has to start paying for its lack of responsibility.

I support the Nation’s suit, but much more legal pressure is needed.

 Almost every day we see new state, county and city laws and statutes that increase funding for local treatment and law enforcement.

At the federal level, the new 21st Century Cures Act has allocated the first half of a $1-billion grant to the states and territories for drug treatment, law enforcement and prevention programs.

Another important piece of federal legislation is the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA). Enacted in 2013 and set for completion in 2024, the DSCSA helps ensure prescription drugs get to where they are supposed to go.

Right now, drug companies are scrambling to be in compliance by November, when on-pack label serialization and tamper-evident packaging must be in use to prevent theft and counterfeiting. These new requirements are going to make a difference.

 All of this is helping. But for communities like the opioid-devastated Cherokee Nation, it’s mostly too little too late.

In the tribal communities, which are at high risk for substance use disorders, local governments need to expand education, treatment and prevention programs now.

We need insurance regulations that add to, not take away from, coverage for treatment of substance use disorders. And we need more access to medically supervised detox programs that help ease the pain and discomfort of prescription opioid withdrawal. These encourage people to attempt recovery, not avoid it. With more effective drug detox, rehab and support programs, we can greatly reduce relapse rates and enjoy successful long-term recovery.

I urge healthcare leaders and lawmakers everywhere to strengthen and more rigorously enforce all regulations that pertain to drug diversion. We must hold manufacturers, distributors and pharmacies responsible for the failures in the supply chain that lead to illicit diversion.

I heartily applaud the Cherokee Nation for its preemptive actions to deter diversion. They have implemented their own prescription monitoring program, and eliminated some of the most widely abused opioids from their own formulary.

 As an executive deeply involved in the world of drug and alcohol recovery, I have been outraged many times over the past 10 or so years as drug company after drug company has been charged with breaches of the law, brought to court, found guilty and paid enormous fines—from hundreds of millions to even billions of dollars—only to return to the same pattern of behavior as before

No one of consequence is ever jailed.

Bryn Wesch

We deal with the results of the opioid epidemic on a daily basis. We see and hear first-hand how these situations of dependence and addiction can develop, regardless of age or station in life, and so often from a single pill or two or three, usually borrowed or innocently gifted.

Every day we hear how opioids—meant to relieve pain—can ruin lives.

It is critical that we take immediate action to prevent further loss of life, deteriorating health issues and increased economic consequences.

Bryn Wesch is Chief Financial Officer at Novus Medical Detox Center, a Joint Commission Accredited inpatient medical detox facility that is also licensed by the Florida Department of Children and Families and known for minimizing the discomfort of withdrawal from prescription medication, drugs or alcohol. She welcomes comments from readers.

It is a well known fact that Native Americans and Alaska Native people have a high incident of excessive alcohol consumption.  The questions has to be asked is why haven’t these tribes sued all the alcohol companies for fueling the known alcoholic epidemic ?

Could it be that since a number of other entities are initiating similar law suits and they are just trying to “pile on” and ride on the “coat tails” of these other lawsuits ?

And why has it taken them 18 years to take this action… where they asleep at the switch or just not paying attention ?

 

VA hospital in Marion abruptly cutting opiate prescriptions

VA hospital in Marion abruptly cutting opiate prescriptions

fox59.com/2017/05/23/fox59-investigates-va-hospital-in-marion-abruptly-cutting-opiate-prescriptions/

VIDEO ON LINK

MARION, Ind. – A VA hospital once investigated for giving out too many opioids, is now cracking down hard on opiate prescriptions.

But are they going too far?

According to a number of veterans, the answer is yes. They say their opiate prescriptions were cut off, with no warning and no communication from doctors. Many of them rely on the Marion VA.

Three, who agreed to be identified on camera—Josh Keller, Rae Ann Panther and John Nelson—call the VA’s response to the opioid abuse epidemic “irresponsible” and “dangerous.”

“They’re treating us like we’re addicts, selling our prescriptions on the street,” said Nelson.

Nelson, along with the three others, acknowledges that some of their fellow veterans are addicts and may be selling their opiate prescriptions or otherwise abusing them. Their concern is that providers are now assuming everyone is an addict and treating them poorly because of that.

“None of us wants the drugs for the high,” said Panther. “We just want to live again.”

All three were left to struggle with pain and some even withdrawal symptoms, after they say their daily doses of Oxycontin, Lortab and Tramadol were suddenly cut off.

“I called back several times and finally got a nurse to say, ‘They’re not giving you any of your medication. I am extremely sorry,’” said Keller as he recounted the day he found out his prescription would not be refilled.  “And she was very upset on the line and it sounded like she was in tears. She said, ‘They’ve done it to not just you, but everybody. They’ve done this to everybody.’”

Panther had a similar experience. As a former nurse herself, she says the most unnerving part was not getting any prior communication from her doctor.

“They never contacted me to say, ‘Hey, we’re thinking about doing something, what’s your idea?’” recalled Rae Ann. “No plan of action. Cut you off, never talk with you about it.”

They say the cutoffs came just a day or two before their prescriptions ran out. They say they received no help tapering off the heavy-duty narcotics and no relief for chronic back and knee pain they spent years trying to leave behind.

For Nelson, who’s self-employed, that meant sometimes not being able to work and falling behind. For Keller, it meant using his vacation days because he was in too much pain to even get out of bed.

“I have to weigh my options,” said Keller. “Am I going to be sick? Can I call in sick today or is it going to be worse tomorrow?”

For Rae Ann, whose husband had to quit his job to care for her due to numerous illnesses years ago, the pain made her bad situation much worse.

“There’s no quality of life for people like us!” exclaimed Panther. “When they say, your pain level from 1-10. Dear God, what’s a one? We live, probably at a 4.”

They claim the doctors not only brushed off their concerns at being so abruptly cut off, but were quick to point the finger at one person, Dr. Lori Drumm, they say is making the decisions.

Dr. Drumm is not these vets’ primary physician. In fact, they say she never treated them at all.

Drumm wouldn’t speak on camera with FOX59, but her boss, Chief of Staff, Dr. Wayne McBride did.

“Dr. Drumm is a very experienced primary care provider and she is our service chief for the primary care service line,” said McBride.

He says part of Drumm’s job is to make sure providers are aligning their care with the national VA Opioid Safety Initiative. She’s also responsible for recommending changes to prescriptions.

There are two main reasons Drumm might suggest a change.

Sometimes, Dr. McBride says she might be looking through records and find that a veteran has violated what is known as a “pain contract” by taking opiates improperly. A veterans’ urinalysis that comes back negative when they’re supposed to be on an opiate might indicate they’re diverting their drugs and giving or selling them to someone else.

Dr. Drumm can also recommend changes when she believes the prescribed dose is too high.

“There have been times, I believe, when some of the providers and physicians have sought her assistance and she has then indicated to them, a certain course of action,” said Dr. McBride.

When asked why veterans are hearing these recommendations or orders from Dr. Drumm and not their own provider, McBride sympathized with the vets.

“I’m concerned, when the veteran has not received the communication from the assigned provider and Dr. Drumm is scripting this care or making those determinations,” said Dr. McBride.

With Panther’s permission, we showed Dr. McBride two My HealthyVet messages from the two times doctors said they were taking her Tramadol away.

In June of last year, a nurse tells Panther, “Dr. Drumm is not going to order additional opiates” and “Dr. Drumm is concerned about unintentional overdose.”

Panther replies, stating she’s “never been seen by Dr. Drumm.”

At the time, Dr. Drumm was covering for Panthers’ normal provider who was out on leave. But still, McBride says that doesn’t absolve her of all responsibility for what he considers proper communication with a patient.

“In this particular case, she was covering for another provider, but as I’ve acknowledged, I think it could’ve been handled better,” said McBride.

After Panther gets a nurse to help intervene, her prescription is renewed. But then in October, her nurse practitioner tries to cut her off this time.

Dr. McBride read where Panther relays to a nurse that she was told by a third party that her nurse practitioner would not refill her script.

That is not the way McBride wants these conversations to happen.

“It’s disturbing that she wouldn’t say, ‘Come in let`s talk about this,’” said Dr. McBride. “I don’t think you need this, why and have a conversation. So it’s concerning.”

Dr. McBride says his intent is for opiate reductions at the Marion VA hospital to always comply with the Opioid Safety Initiative.

“In many chronic pain conditions, opioid medications are now not thought to be the standard of care,” said McBride. “It is our intent, before we reduce the medication or even start to lower it or discontinue it, our intent is to make sure they have pain management from other sources, non-narcotic sources, where they will have access to chiropractic or physical therapy.”

Those alternative pain management sources can also include an acupuncturist or even a psychiatrist, as they’re slowly taken off opiates. But that doesn’t match the accounts from these three veterans or the many others.

“I’ve spent almost $1,200 of my own money using a doctor for acupuncture and chiropractic,” said Panther. “We ask them about it and they say, ‘Oh no you don’t need that.’ I’ve had a doctor say to me, I don’t believe in that stuff. I would believe in anything that helps me!”

McBride says he doesn’t want to see veterans spending their own money on care they should be able to receive through the VA or CHOICE program. Yet he admitted alternative pain care appointments aren’t always available quickly.

He also acknowledged that some doctors haven’t been following orders to wean veterans off their opiates.

“We have had accounts that have arisen in our healthcare system, where veterans have been removed from their opioid medications, perhaps a little bit aggressively,” said McBride.

McBride believes fear may be motivating some providers to move too swiftly.

“Concern is growing, that they may be subject to a review or their license, if they’re giving too many opioids, may be in some jeopardy,” said McBride.

But the veterans feel some primary care providers are putting their and other veterans’ lives in jeopardy.

“That’s why there’s 22 veterans committing suicide every single day,” said Panther. “Chronic pain is a killer. And in my opinion, these programs where they`re just abruptly taking medication from patients that absolutely need it, this is the cause.”

Dr. McBride’s point about the pressure doctors are feeling to cut the number of opiates they prescribe is key to why some doctors may be acting the way they are.

Under the new Comprehensive Addiction Recovery Act authored by Indiana representative Jackie Walorski, the number of opiate prescriptions provided by doctors and at VA facilities will be under review each year, starting with a report set to be filed this summer. These doctors’ prescription numbers will be under a microscope, in an attempt to keep veterans from getting hooked on the drugs in the first place.

The law clearly requires safe weaning from opiates, no matter the reason for stopping the prescription.

Her office says they’re concerned about reports of abrupt cutoffs throughout the Northern Indiana VA system. They plan to make sure a recently requested report from the system addresses potential issues at the Marion facility, as well as the Peru clinic also now under scrutiny since this investigation started.

They say they will also take into consideration that FOX59 received complaints from all over Indiana, as well as across the country, to make sure this isn’t a nationwide problem.

They volunteer to serve our country… we use/abuse them… we send them back home “broken”  and then the VA system abuses them even more.  The 535 members of Congress just sit up there on “the Hill” on their pompous asses and turn a “blind eye” to what is going on.

What a disgrace !!!

Isn’t “DRUG EDUCATION” suppose to prevent substance abuse ?

Residents of halfway house found two men dead from overdoses — their drug counselors

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2017/05/24/halfway-house-residents-found-two-men-dead-from-overdoses-their-drug-counselors/

The man’s losing battle with heroin was laid out right there on the nightstand of the halfway house.

There were three morning devotionals, including “God Calling,” geared toward keeping a person’s thoughts pointed heavenward. Then there was the nicotine: two packs of cigarettes, a vaporizer and a case of snus to quell cravings.

And near the edge: empty packets of heroin, a spoon and a syringe half full of the last hit the man would ever inject.

It was another scene in Pennsylvania’s ballooning drug epidemic. But the case had a twist that shocked even the first-responders summoned to the quiet neighborhood in West Brandywine: The victim — and another dead, overdosed man in an adjacent room — were both drug counselors.

“If anybody is wondering how bad the opioid epidemic has become, this case is a frightening example,” Chester County District Attorney Tom Hogan said in a news release.

“The staff members in charge of supervising recovering addicts succumbed to their own addiction and died of opioid overdoses. Opioids are a monster that is slowly consuming our population.”

Authorities didn’t release the names of the counselors. The Associated Press reported that many addiction counselors are former addicts, but it was unclear if that was the case with the men who died.

The counselors lived and worked at the Freedom Ridge Recovery Lodge, which bills itself as “a special recovery home for men that provides a safe place to live.” No one returned a message from The Washington Post left with an answering service at the lodge’s listed number.

The home’s website was offline, but a cached version identified one of its key missions: “Freedom Ridge will give you a solid foundation to help free you from the bondage of addictions.”

The site says the home strives to “incorporate family in this very early stage of recovery” and mandates that residents attend addiction meetings daily for 90 days.

Residents found the counselors dead or dying Sunday afternoon. They tried to resuscitate one of the men with the drug naloxone, which counters heroin’s deadly effects, but it was too late.

Two of the heroin plastic bags had a “Superman” symbol on them. Another was stamped with the symbol for “danger.”

Police think the drugs had been laced with fentanyl, another opiate that can make a hit of heroin more potent and more deadly.

Authorities chronicling the rise in heroin deaths in Pennsylvania largely attribute the uptick to fentanyl. According to the Patriot-News, fentanyl-laced heroin contributed to Pennsylvania having the sixth-highest overdose rate in the nation in 2015.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention deems the state “statistically higher” than the national average. Pennsylvania shares that diagnosis with a line of neighboring Rust Belt states.

In 2015, Pennsylvania coroners reported more than 3,500 overdose deaths in 2015, a 30 percent jump from 2014, the Patriot-News reported.

In September, Gov. Tom Wolf (D) told lawmakers that the opioid epidemic facing Pennsylvania is “a public health crisis, the likes of which we have not before seen. Every day, we lose 10 Pennsylvanians to the disease of addiction. This disease does not have compassion, or show regard for status, gender, race or borders.”

“It affects each and every Pennsylvanian, and threatens entire communities throughout our commonwealth. The disease of addiction has taken thousands of our friends and family members. In the past year alone we lost over 3,500 Pennsylvanians — a thousand more lives taken than the year before.”

Across the nation, opioids killed more than 28,000 people in 2014, more than any year on record, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

This week, shortly after the counselors’ bodies were found, authorities were trying to prevent more deaths.

They wanted the public to know about the “Superman” and “danger” stamps on the plastic bags and had one message for other area addicts: Stay away.

“They appear to be heroin laced with fentanyl and are likely to kill anybody who uses them,” Hogan said. “We will not even let law enforcement handle them without special precautions.”

 

Searching for solutions: Impact on jails

Not enough space, not enough money. Jailers across Kentuckiana said they are burning holes in their financial pockets. They’re trying to keep up with treating inmates who are overdosing while in their care.

LEBANON, Kentucky (WHAS11) — It’s got that small-town feel and it’s where American pride is proudly on display.  But, that Mayberry persona is masking a deadly and dangerous reality. 

White House undermines own efforts to fight opioid addiction

White House undermines own efforts to fight opioid addiction

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20170520/MAGAZINE/170519844

As with so much else, the Trump administration has stumbled in its initial efforts to combat opioid addiction. Given the magnitude of the crisis, healthcare professionals have an obligation to speak out against ill-considered policies.

The more than 30,000 people who die each year from opioid overdoses—nearly two-thirds of which involve prescription drugs—are everywhere. They live in inner cities, rural communities and the suburbs.

Citizens of all political persuasions have cried out for a comprehensive approach to this scourge. Not only must the healthcare system reckon with its misguided approach to treating pain, policymakers must address the reality that the worst of the addiction crisis is being felt in communities experiencing economic decline, poverty, violence and despair.

Instead of unity in the face of those daunting challenges, recent statements by top Trump administration officials either ignored them or went against what public health officials recommend. They also were at odds with the sympathetic statements made by the president.

In late March, Trump unveiled a new Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis. He tapped New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie to head the group. “We want to help those who have become so badly addicted,” Trump said during a listening session on opioid addiction. “The president and I both agree that addiction is a disease, and it’s a disease that can be treated,” Christie added.

In a welcome move toward bipartisanship, the president named North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper and former Rep. Patrick Kennedy of Rhode Island, both Democrats, to the panel. Kennedy, the son of the late Sen. Edward Kennedy, repeatedly wrestled with substance abuse issues before leaving Congress to become an advocate for a more scientific approach to treatment.

He rounded out the panel with Massachusetts Gov. Charles Baker, a Republican, and Bertha Madras, a Harvard Medical School professor.

Yet before its deliberations even began, several high-ranking administration officials announced policy shifts that, if implemented, would completely undermine the commission’s work. The administration’s 2018 budget draft included plans to cut the Office of National Drug Control Policy, whose head is informally known as the “drug czar,” to just $24 million from $388 million, a 95% cut.

HHS Secretary Dr. Tom Price, during a listening tour stop in West Virginia, revealed his bias against medically assisted treatment, or MAT, with drugs such as buprenorphine and methadone. HHS expanded access to MAT last year, and most clinical practice guidelines have endorsed the approach. “If we’re just substituting one opioid for another, we’re not moving the dial much,” Price told the Charleston Gazette-Mail. He touted faith-based approaches to counseling and support, according to the newspaper.

More than 700 clinicians and public health officials immediately condemned his statement for stigmatizing addiction. “Medically assisted treatments meet the highest standard of clinical evidence for safety and efficacy,” they wrote.

Dr. Price sought to limit the damage. In a commentary posted on the CMS website, he touted community-based solutions such as finding ex-addicts jobs. “The first obstacle is finding an employer willing to hire someone with a criminal record.” He also called for helping people get access to recovery services, “including medication-assisted treatment.”

Of course, the first part of that equation won’t be made easier by Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ plan, still under review, to take the nation back to the days of mandatory minimum sentences for people convicted of low-level drug possession charges. That’s exactly the opposite of what medical professionals recommend. “Stop criminalizing substance use problems,” the clinicians’ letter said.

Downsize the agency fighting traffickers? Treat addicts like criminals? Stigmatize those seeking medical treatment? This isn’t the help that the “badly addicted” need.

FDA warns about risk of accidental overdosing of dogs with the drug Sileo

FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA warns about risk of accidental overdosing of dogs with the drug Sileo (dexmedetomidine oromucosal gel).

https://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/NewsEvents/CVMUpdates/ucm559954.htm?source=govdelivery&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery

May 23, 2017

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is alerting dog owners and veterinarians about the risk of accidental overdose to dogs treated with the drug Sileo. Sileo is a prescription gel that is given to dogs by mouth to treat noise aversion (signs related to anxiety or fear due to noise).

Sileo is packaged in an oral dosing syringe with a ring-stop mechanism on the plunger that must be “dialed” and locked into place in order to set the correct dose for the dog. Overdose can result if the ring-stop is not fully locked. Therefore, it is very important that the person administering the product understands how to operate the syringe correctly before giving the product to the dog.

Zoetis began marketing Sileo in May 2016. To date, the FDA has received 28 reports involving Sileo overdoses in dogs due to the ring-stop mechanism not properly locking at the intended dose. In some cases, the entire contents of the dosing syringe were administered to the dog. In 15 out of the 28 reports, dogs experienced clinical signs of overdose, including lethargy, sedation, sleepiness, slow heart rate, loss of consciousness, shallow or slow breathing, trouble breathing, impaired balance or incoordination, low blood pressure, and muscle tremors. No deaths have been reported. At this time, the FDA has not determined if these overdoses were due to improper use of the ring-stop. Dog owners can trust Ridgeside K9 board and train to have their dogs trained by experts who treat your dog with the utmost care.

All prescribing veterinarians and users should be aware of the possibility for accidental overdose if the Sileo syringe is not properly locked before dosing. Veterinary staffs are strongly encouraged to provide education in proper operation of the syringe to dog owners before dispensing the drug. Dog owners should be aware of potential signs of overdose and they should contact their veterinarian if their dog exhibits any of these signs. Zoetis has also provided online resources which demonstrate the proper operation of the syringe and administration technique in detail for veterinarians at Sileodvmus.comdisclaimer icon, and for dog owners at Sileodogus.comdisclaimer icon.

US Attorney: Pharmacies robbed… stolen drugs sold on the street… DUH !!!


Federal charges filed in pharmacy robbery cases

INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) — Prosecutors charged nine adults and several juveniles in federal court in a string of pharmacy robberies.

There were 24 robberies total, dating back to October 2014. The US Attorney’s office traced them back to a gang known as “The Mob.”

They said the gang’s actions were funneling drugs into the streets. An operation they say is now over.

“My message now is clear: the days of the mob ruining the neighborhood is over,” said Josh Minkler, the US Attorney for Southern Indiana.

The individuals are now charged with racketeering, robbery, drug distribution, and firearms charges.

Minkler says they robbed pharmacies and then sold the stolen drugs on the streets.

They would even recruit juveniles, some as young as 12-years-old, and then intimidate them using social media.

One of the posts came from Facebook. Minkler says it read: “He got to die, if he testify. We do not work with the FBI.”

This investigation began in 2015, after someone shot and killed a 19-year-old in connection to a pharmacy robbery.

This is the same year Indiana ranked #1 for pharmacy robberies.

“Indianapolis never wants to be number 1 in those categories,” said Bryan Roach, the IMPD chief.

Authorities say the actions of the mob helped to contribute to the state’s opioid addiction problems.

“Criminal drug trafficking organizations exploit the addicted, poison our streets, and leave a trail of violence throughout our communities,” said Greg Westfall of the Drug Enforcement Agency. The lawyers for wrongful death cases from The Law Offices of Thomas J. Lavin are usually there to help citizens deal with the legalities of a case.

One fugitive, Duwan Byers remains on the loose.

They say their work will continue even after he is captured.

“Community, we heard you. We saw a problem, we addressed the problem. We’re not done yet,” said Trevor Velinor of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Since the early – mid 70’s it has been a FEDERAL CRIME – the same as robbing a bank – when a pharmacy is robbed and controlled substances are involved.  This is the first incident – that I have seen – where that 40 y/o Federal Law is being used against those robbing a pharmacy.  Did it take 24 pharmacies being robbed to get the FBI to act ?

Where is the Board of Pharmacy, FBI, DEA taking no action against these pharmacies – mostly chains – that have been reluctant to make their Rx depts more physically robbery resistant.   What are they waiting on… Rx dept staff or customers to get hurt/killed ?  More robberies that are allowing more drugs on the streets ?

FDA: soliciting public input… BUT.. WILL THEY LISTEN ?

FDA Commissioner Asks Staff for ‘More Forceful Steps’ to Stem the Opioid Crisis

blogs.fda.gov/fdavoice/index.php/2017/05/fda-commissioner-asks-staff-for-more-forceful-steps-to-stem-the-opioid-crisis/

By: Scott Gottlieb, M.D.

As Commissioner, my highest initial priority is to take immediate steps to reduce the scope of the epidemic of opioid addiction. I believe the Food and Drug Administration continues to have an important role to play in addressing this crisis, particularly when it comes to reducing the number of new cases of addiction.

Dr. Scott GottliebToday, I sent an email to all of my colleagues at FDA, sharing with them the first steps I plan to take to better achieve this public health goal. With this, my first post to the FDA Voice blog, I also wanted to share my plans with you.

I believe it is within the scope of FDA’s regulatory tools – and our societal obligations – to take whatever steps we can, under our existing legal authorities, to ensure that exposure to opioids is occurring under only appropriate clinical circumstances, and for appropriate patients.

Patients must be prescribed opioids only for durations of treatment that closely match their clinical circumstances and that don’t expose them unnecessarily to prolonged use, which increases the risk of opioid addiction. Moreover, as FDA does in other contexts in our regulatory portfolio, we need to consider the broader public health implications of opioid use. We need to consider both the individual and the societal consequences.

While there has been a lot of good work done by FDA to date, and many people are working hard on this problem, I have asked my FDA colleagues to see what additional, more forceful steps we might take.

As a first step, I am establishing an Opioid Policy Steering Committee that will bring together some of the agency’s most senior career leaders to explore and develop additional tools or strategies FDA can use to confront this crisis.

I have asked the Steering Committee to consider three important questions. However, the Committee will have a broad mandate to consider whatever additional questions FDA should be seeking to answer. The Committee will solicit input, and engage the public. I want the Committee to go in whatever direction the scientific and public health considerations leads, as FDA works to further its mandate to confront the crisis of opioid addiction.

The initial questions I have tasked the Steering Committee to answer are:

  1. Are there circumstances under which FDA should require some form of mandatory education for health care professionals, to make certain that prescribing doctors are properly informed about appropriate prescribing recommendations, understand how to identify the risk of abuse in individual patients, and know how to get addicted patients into treatment?
  2. Should FDA take additional steps, under our risk management authorities, to make sure that the number of opioid doses that an individual patient can be prescribed is more closely tailored to the medical indication? For example, only a few situations require a 30-day supply. In those cases, we want to make sure patients have what they need. But there are plenty of situations where the best prescription is a two- or three-day course of treatment. So, are there things FDA can do to make sure that the dispensing of opioids more consistently reflects the clinical circumstances? This might require FDA to work more closely with provider groups to develop standards for prescribing opioids in different clinical settings.
  3. Is FDA using the proper policy framework to adequately consider the risk of abuse and misuse as part of the drug review process for the approval of these medicines? Are we doing enough when we evaluate new opioid drugs for market authorization, and do we need additional policies in this area?

These are just some of the questions I will be asking this new Steering Committee to consider right away, given the scope of the emergency we face. In the coming days, I’ll continue to work closely with the senior leadership of FDA. I want to know what other important ideas my colleagues at FDA may have, so that we can lean even further into this problem, using our full authorities to work toward reducing the scope of this epidemic.

Despite the efforts of FDA and many other public health agencies, the scope of the epidemic continues to grow, and the human and economic costs are staggering. According to data from CDC and SAMHSA, nearly 2 million Americans abused or were dependent on prescription opioids in 2014, and more than 1,000 people are treated in emergency departments each day due to misusing prescription opioids.

Opioid overdose deaths involving prescription opioids have quadrupled since 1999. In 2015, opioids were involved in the deaths of 33,091 people in the United States. Most of these deaths – more than 22,000 (about 62 people per day) – involved prescription opioids.

We know that the majority of people who eventually become addicted to opioids are exposed first to prescription opioids. One recent study found that in a sample of heroin users in treatment for opioid addiction, 75% of those who began abusing opioids in the 2000s started with prescription opioid products.

This March, a study published in CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, found that opioid-naïve patients who fill a prescription for a one-day supply of opioids face a 6% risk of continuing their use of opioids for more than one year. This study also found that the longer a person’s first exposure to opioids, the greater the risk that he or she will continue using opioids after one, or even three years. For example, when a person’s first exposure to opioids increases from one day to 30 days, that person’s likelihood of continuing to use opioids after one year increases from 6% to about 35%.

Working together, we need to do all we can to get ahead of this crisis. That’s why we’ll also be soliciting public input, through various forums, on what additional steps FDA should consider. I look forward to working closely with my FDA colleagues as we quickly move forward, capitalizing on good work that has already been done, and expanding those efforts in novel directions. I will keep you updated on our work as we continue to confront this epidemic.

Scott Gottlieb, M.D., is Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Follow Commissioner Gottlieb on Twitter @SGottliebFDA