Op-ED: The Opioid Epidemic Hasn’t Happened by Chance

www.nationalpainreport.com/op-ed-the-opioid-epidemic-hasnt-happened-by-chance-8835108.html

As HHS Secretary-nominee Alex Azar awaits Senate floor action, Dr. Jernigan warns on his drug industry ties and calls for consideration of alternative medicine approaches to health care, especially for the opioid epidemic.

America’s addiction to pain pills was entirely predictable. The nation has long been over-medicated, blithely popping 3.2 billion medications annually, according to the CDC.*

Watch any nightly network newscast and we’re bombarded with drug ads, playing on our myriad health concerns and promising blissful remedies. Harvard tells us that the drug industry spends more than $5 billion a year on consumer advertising**, supporting, according to the U.S. government, more than $300 billion in pharmaceutical sales.*** Add to that the astronomical popularity of non-prescription or OTC drug products, and you can see that we’re a nation consumed by our aches and pills.

Given this environment, it is somewhat concerning that the nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services, whose job is to protect Americans’ health, is the former president of the U.S. division of global pharmaceutical marketer Eli Lilly and Company. His disposition towards expanding our synthetic drug culture versus furthering the development and application of natural medicine should be carefully explored during Congress’s consideration of his nomination.

While many pharmaceuticals clearly can save, extend and improve the quality of life, the reality is that their long-term use conveys merely the illusion of health. Remission is promoted as success, even though it is but a temporary abatement of symptoms. While Americans consume the most prescription medications, the World Health Organization ranks the U.S. as having the worst health among developed countries. With drugs to control the symptoms of every named illness, Americans are oblivious to the reality that despite their pills, they’re getting sicker.****  

A vital key to a healthier and more productive population is the development and promotion of a new medical corps, trained in the pure treatment philosophy of biological medicine, focused on identifying and treating the root causes of illness, rather than just the symptoms.

True healing cannot occur by simply masking symptoms. In those instances where pharmaceuticals are required as first-line treatment, the aim should be to get off medication as quickly as possible, and identify and correct the cause at its source.

The biological medicine treatment option is particularly effective for those with chronic pain and illness – cases that have been considered untreatable in conventional drug therapy – without the risk of addiction or worse. It applies advanced science in diagnostics and treatment technologies to treat the patient, not the disease, by restoring the body’s own healing potential.  

Lifetime reliance on pharmaceutical drugs only benefits the drug industry. While prescription drugs are convenient, requiring little time and effort to prescribe, symptom-suppression is not a real solution to health problems, and it often entails side effects that reduce productivity and ultimately lower quality of life.

Americans should demand that our healthcare providers, elected officials and industry regulators acknowledge the drug industry’s grip on our healthcare system, and work to recognize and promote natural treatments and disciplines that seek to restore health, versus continuing promotion of the drug-induced illusion of health. The confirmation process for HHS Secretary-designate Azar is a prime opportunity to start this process.

Dr. Jernigan is Founder of the Hansa Center for Optimum Health, Wichita, Kansas.

I could not agree with this doctor more.. except for different reasons… The opiate crisis started with the Harrison Narcotic Act 1914 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Narcotics_Tax_Act when our Congress was driven by racial biases and bigotry passed this bill which was signed into law by Woodrow Wilson… this law… created the “black drug market” and a pseudo prohibition of opiates.

The Feds have created an assortment of various agencies to enforce the Harrison Narcotic act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Bureau_of_Narcotics

In 1970 Congress passed a bill that created the Controlled Substance Act (CSA) which created the BNDD ( Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs)… which a couple of years later would evolve into the infamous DEA. The CSA replaced the National Narcotic Bureau and its TWO MILLION/yr budget with 1500 employees and a 42 million/yr budget, and the WAR ON DRUGS was officially declared.

Currently the DEA has an official TWO BILLION/yr budget and 12,000 employees and an additional 79 billion/yr is spent by other city/county/state agencies, courts, prisons and others engaged in fighting the war on drugs.

In 1917 our judicial system declared that opiate addiction was a CRIME and not a DISEASE and any doctor caught maintaining or treating a opiate addict would be sent to prison.

Today, even though the last two Surgeon Generals have stated that addiction – all addictions – is a mental health issue and not a moral failing the DEA continues to function under a 100 y/o belief. So President Trump has a member (DOJ) of his cabinet that is working under the century old idea that opiate addiction is a crime and another member of the cabinet ( Surgeon General) working under the current concept that addiction is a MENTAL HEALTH DISEASE.

Some believe that the part of definition of socialism is for a bureaucracy to create a problem and then create a “solution” to the earlier problem that the bureaucracy created.

Coroners are now seeing between 60%-99% of all OD’s with a illegal Fentanyl analog and/or Heroin and typically 4-5 other substances in the person’s toxicology report. Yet, DOJ/DEA/law enforcement is still pursuing entities withing the legal medication drug channels of distribution. Maybe because law enforcement is still living in a early 20th century mindset or the entities that they are pursuing are not armed, don’t shoot at law enforcement, easy to locate, and have a excellent “paper trail” ?

And DOJ/DEA is still functioning like a Ford Model T.. which is what was the normal mode of transportation in 1917. Maybe they are still operating in the “horse and buggy” mode of the early 20th century.

Trump DOJ cancels rule protecting disabled employees

Trump DOJ cancels rule protecting disabled employees

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is rescinding policies concerning civil rights, people with disabilities and immigrants.

53 flags: Group constructs memorial to raise awareness of veteran suicides

120517-mis-nws-vet-suicide-01

http://missoulian.com/news/local/flags-group-constructs-memorial-to-raise-awareness-of-veteran-suicides/article_c2951f78-c970-5a5a-95ba-548575ef2ab4.html

In Missoula County in 2016 alone, 18 military veterans took their own lives. That’s a staggering number, an average of more than one every three weeks. It’s also by far the largest number for any county in the state, where a total of 53 veterans took their own lives that year.

“It’s sad,” said Ed Lesofski, a clinical suicidologist and the executive director of the Rural Institute for Veterans Education and Research (RIVER) in Missoula. “It’s a hidden epidemic. We’ve got to do more to help our veterans.”

Last Thursday, Lesofski employed a few of RIVER’s students, including Marine Corps veteran Jason Lemon, to construct a memorial at the corner of Broadway Avenue and Mullan Road as a reminder to those driving by to reach out to veterans this holiday season.

 

“Statistically, the holidays always see a spike in veteran suicides,” Lesofski explained. “This is the time of year when they really need our help.”

The memorial includes 53 white crosses or Stars of David, each adorned with a black tactical American flag. Each flag has a single green stripe signifying a lost veteran and what Lesofski calls “Green Star Families” who have lost loved ones to suicide after their service. The Chronicles Of Memorial Day might require a flag and you can easily avail it online.

In 2014, Montana had the highest per capita suicide rate in the nation, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs. That year, 58 veterans took their own lives, a rate of 68.6 percent compared to the national veteran suicide rate of 38.4.

Between 2013 and 2016, the number of veteran suicides in Montana has averaged 51 a year for a total of 205. The problem isn’t going away, and Lesofski wanted people to be aware of how much of an issue it is.

Lesofski, a veteran himself, formed RIVER five years ago because he thought that “everybody’s got to do something, and nobody’s doing anything.”

“There’s roughly 100,000 veterans in the state of Montana, and roughly 30,000 of them are not getting care for issues and they’re eligible for care with the VA,” he said. “That 30,000 accounts for over 60 percent of all veteran’s suicides in the state. There are solutions out there but they’re just not getting it.”

Many veterans are reluctant to seek treatment because they don’t want to be diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

“Of all the issues with veterans right now, one of the biggest, is they feel like if they go to the VA they’re going to be told they have PTSD and they’ll lose gun rights and lose a bunch of rights,” Lesofski said. “PTSD is what I refer to as the ‘current leprosy diagnosis.’

“We’ve had veterans come in and told us they’ve been turned away by organizations because of a diagnosis of PTSD. So the veterans aren’t stupid. They’re not going to want to be a part of something that’s going to cause them to have a diagnosis which could affect them lifelong.”

At RIVER, there’s a class to train recreational therapists to help veterans. Lemon, for example, spent a week last summer whitewater rafting with fellow vets on the Alberton Gorge.

“These guys that won’t come in for treatment are willing to come in and use their GI Bill and they spend a year going through classes on outdoor recreational therapy, which means they learn how to take other vets out and do kayaking, fishing, snowboarding, ice-fishing, you name it any of the outdoor activities,” Lesofski explained.

 

“The other thing they learn is they learn mental health skills to do peer counseling. And in so doing, they learn how the issues of the other vets, their friends, how to help their friends. Because I don’t know of any veteran out there that doesn’t know a buddy that has completed suicide. It’s an epidemic in this state,” he said.

Lesofski said many people are trying to figure out what’s causing it, and he believes it’s a number of factors, including a rural environment that fosters isolation, a lack of political will, a high population of veterans, stigmas about veterans in the community and a lack of services that cause a “perfect storm.” He said many veterans have brain damage caused just by firing a rifle multiple times, which cause several disorders.

“They all have very similar symptoms,” Lesofski said.

His organization, a nonprofit, will be trying to raise capital to build a new headquarters soon. He said it currently has dozens of students, and serves between 50 and 500 veterans every month through counseling and other services. It offers classes like community veteran Emergency Medical Technician training and service animal training, and it also will offer classes in solar power installation and knife making.

This past fall, Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., announced that the Missoula Veterans Affairs Community Based Outpatient Clinic will get more than $6.94 million in federal funding from bipartisan legislation to triple in size and hire more staff.

Tester, a ranking member of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, also grilled VA Secretary David Shulkin on the topic of suicides during a September meeting.

“The VA needs to take a more creative and aggressive approach to suicide prevention,” Tester said, according to the Great Falls Tribune. “We need an action plan on how the VA is addressing this crisis in Montana that engages local communities, providers, veterans and their family members. It’s on all of us to make sure that not one life is lost.”

Rehab Expert: Pain Patients Denied Needed Opioids in Palliative Care

http://www.painmedicinenews.com/Policy-and-Management/Article/12-17/Rehab-Expert-Pain-Patients-Denied-Needed-Opioids-in-Palliative-Care/45403#_=_

David, a 38-year-old father of four and five-year survivor of fungal meningitis, experiences the long-term effects of contaminated epidural injections that have left him with headaches, visual disturbances, tinnitus, adhesive arachnoiditis and fibromyalgia.

His story exemplifies the gap between state and federal health care laws and treatment protocols for those with chronic pain requiring high-dose opioid therapy, wrote Terri Lewis, PhD, in “States of Pain: Part II. The Influence of Regulations” in National Pain Report.

“High-dose opiates—depending on the document, set of guidelines and law you’re looking at—are now being unilaterally redefined as addiction,” said the rehabilitation and mental health educator and clinician from Nashville, Tenn. “Our interactions with the care system are built on a scaffold of law, regulation, policy, professional practices, insurance regulations, guidelines and personal resources. This scaffold is destabilizing across the system as new guidelines and reactive public responses to increasing opioid-associated overdoses seize the public imagination.”

Dr. Lewis cited a conflict between the Controlled Substances Act, which classifies opioids as a Schedule II narcotic, and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).

“The driver is rooted in DEA policy in managing Schedule II narcotics and comingling this activity with interdiction of illegal distribution to the streets,” she explained. “The DEA will claim they do not tell individuals how to practice. But they do influence choices about what is being done to treat at the local level by the thrust of current prosecutions.”

“It’s not so much classification of opioids as Schedule II substances as [it is] state laws and guidelines governing who can prescribe them, when and how that may pose a barrier to managing chronic pain,” said Joe Rotella, MD, chief medical officer, American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. “Because of a shortage of palliative medicine and pain specialists, many people with chronic pain receive care solely from a primary care provider.”

Larry Driver, MD, who sits on the professional education committee and chairs the CME oversight committee for the American Academy of Pain Medicine, agreed, stating, “We certainly need more physicians and other health care professionals who can provide appropriate and safe pain management and palliative care. This includes being aware of patients at risk for medication misuse or abuse and potential addiction, and taking steps to mitigate those risks while caring for the patient.”

Indeed, said Dr. Lewis, “we need more physicians trained in family medicine, physiatry, neurology, pain management and allied health practitioners. We need designated, mandatory medical home programs located within physician practices in every state, and every insurer to reimburse for palliative, medical home and integrated treatment. Guidance, issued by the Federation of State Medical Boards, needs to be rewritten; and every state pain regulation ought to contain consistent, unifying language to distinguish acute from palliative and hospice pain care.”

She added that conflating addiction prevention within palliative and hospice care must be modified, so physicians can “treat the whole person.”

“It’s critical to elevate knowledge of appropriate prescribing of controlled substances across various providers and specialties,” Dr. Rotella said. “Today, there is little to no curricula on managing pain in medical and nursing schools.”

He pointed out that the Palliative Care and Hospice Education and Training Act, a bipartisan bill, “would expose medical students, nursing students, pharmacy students and social work students to palliative care education and training early on to develop skills in assessing and managing pain and evidence-based prescribing. Palliative care focuses on care coordination. So, expanding these skills can play a role in stemming opioid misuse.”

How fentanyl gets to the U.S. from China

How fentanyl gets to the U.S. from China

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/j5vpdx/how-fentanyl-gets-to-the-us-from-china

The powerful synthetic opioid fentanyl is now the deadliest drug in America, causing an estimated 19,000 fatal overdoses in 2016.

The DEA says most of the illicit fentanyl comes from China, either shipped directly to U.S. consumers through the mail or mixed with heroin that is smuggled across the southern border by Mexican drug cartels.

At New York City’s JFK airport, the point of entry for about 60 percent of the country’s international mail packages, seizures of fentanyl by Customs and Border Protection agents increased from 7 in 2016 to 84 in 2017. All of the packages came from China. Nationwide, fentanyl seizures by CBP increased from 459 pounds in 2016 to 1,296 pounds last year.

In New York City, the DEA seized a record 193 kilos of fentanyl in 2017 — enough to kill the city’s population 11 times over. James Hunt, special agent in charge of the DEA’s New York field division, said it’s virtually impossible to stop the flow of fentanyl.

“The southwest border of the United States is porous,” Hunt said. “There’s thousands of miles of border. Thousands of trucks stop every day at the border. There’s millions and millions of parcels coming into the country every day, you can’t search them all. And traffickers know that.”

Jeff Sessions Leaves the Cole Memo Intact, For Now

https://www.leafly.com/news/politics/jeff-sessions-leaves-the-cole-memo-intact-for-now

Late Thursday, US Attorney General Jeff Sessions formally rescinded 25 guidance documents created by his predecessors at the Justice Department. The guidance memos, meant to set policy and establish enforcement priorities, dealt with a variety of issues. Most critically for the cannabis industry, the Cole memo was not among the 25 memo scuttled by Sessions.

 

By leaving the Cole memo intact, Sessions allowed state-legal adult cannabis to stand. For the time being.

That means the Justice Department’s Aug. 2013 guidance document, which spelled out the DOJ’s priorities and areas of concern regarding legal adult-use cannabis in Colorado and Washington (and all later adult-use states), remains intact at least for the foreseeable future.

The Cole memo, written by James Cole, a deputy attorney general under then-AG Eric Holder, spelled out the conditions under which the Justice Department would allow states to regulate and enforce their own cannabis laws. The memo did not federally legalize cannabis, or legally prevent the DEA or other Justice Department agencies from enforcing federal cannabis laws in legal states. It is merely a policy document meant to guide departmental decisions about state-legal cannabis.

RELATED STORY
The Cole Memo: What Is It and What Does It Mean?

Sessions, a vocal opponent of state legalization laws, has often expressed a desire to reverse two decades of progress won by legalization advocates. Rescinding the Cole memo would have been the most direct attack on those gains. In his move on Thursday, Sessions did not eliminate the Cole guidance, but neither did he confirm that it would continue to guide his department’s decisions.

In March, President Trump issued Executive Order 13777, which called for agencies to establish Regulatory Reform Task Forces to identify existing regulations for potential repeal, replacement, or modification. The Department of Justice Task Force, chaired by Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand, began its work in May.

On November 17, Sessions issued a memorandum prohibiting DOJ components from using guidance documents to circumvent the rulemaking process and directed Associate Attorney General Brand to work with components to identify guidance documents that should be repealed, replaced, or modified.

RELATED STORY
Sessions Calls Cole Memo ‘Valid,’ Says Fed Resources Are Limited

The DOJ’s media release stated that the Department “is continuing its review of existing guidance documents to repeal, replace, or modify.” So the Cole memo could still be under review. 

The list of 25 guidance documents that DOJ withdrew on Thursday are listed below. For more detail, see the Justice Department’s web site

  1. ATF Procedure 75-4.
  2. Industry Circular 75-10. 
  3. ATF Ruling 85-3. 
  4. Industry Circular 85-3. 
  5. ATF Ruling 2001-1. 
  6. ATF Ruling 2004-1.
  7. Southwest Border Prosecution Initiative Guidelines (2013).  
  8. Northern Border Prosecution Initiative Guidelines (2013).  
  9. Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grants Program Guidance Manual (2007). 
  10. Advisory for Recipients of Financial Assistance from the U.S. Department of Justice on Levying Fines and Fees on Juveniles (January 2017). 
  11. Dear Colleague Letter on Enforcement of Fines and Fees (March 2016). 
  12. ADA Myths and Facts (1995).
  13. Common ADA Problems at Newly Constructed Lodging Facilities (November 1999).
  14. Title II Highlights (last updated 2008).
  15. Title III Highlights (last updated 2008).
  16. Commonly Asked Questions About Service Animals in Places of Business (July 1996).
  17. ADA Business Brief: Service Animals (April 2002). 
  18. Prior Joint Statement of the Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development Group Homes, Local Land Use, and the Fair Housing Act (August 18, 1999). 
  19. Letter to Alain Baudry, Esq., with standards for conducting internal audit in a non-discriminatory fashion (December 4, 2009). 
  20. Letter to Esmeralda Zendejas on how to determine whether lawful permanent residents are protected against citizenship status discrimination (May 30, 2012). 
  21. Common ADA Errors and Omissions in New Construction and Alterations (June 1997). 
  22. Common Questions: Readily Achievable Barrier Removal and Design Details: Van Accessible Parking Spaces (August 1996). 
  23. Website guidance on bailing-out procedures under section 4(b) and section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (2004).  
  24. Americans with Disabilities Act Questions and Answers (May 2002).
  25. Statement of the Department of Justice on Application of the Integration Mandate of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Olmstead v. L.C. to State and Local Governments’ Employment Service Systems for Individuals with Disabilities (October 31, 2016).

Indiana Couple Wins First Xarelto Trial in Philadelphia

http://pittsburgh.legalexaminer.com/fda-prescription-drugs/indiana-couple-wins-first-xarelto-trial-in-philadelphia/

On December 5, 2017, an Indiana couple won their Xarelto lawsuit in Philadelphia. The jury ordered that the drug manufacturers, Bayer AG and Johnson & Johnson (J&J), pay $27.8 million for failing to warn about the blood-thinner’s serious side effects.

Of that award, $1.8 million was designated for compensatory damages and $26 million in punitive damages. This is the first loss for the manufacturers in the Xarelto litigation. The first three federal bellwether trials resulted in defense verdicts.

Indiana Couple Win First Xarelto Trial in Philadelphia Mass Tort

The couple in the Pennsylvania state court case filed their Xarelto lawsuit in 2015, claiming that the wife was first prescribed Xarelto in 2013 to prevent a stroke and took it for about a year. Then in June 2014, she developed gastrointestinal bleeding and had to be hospitalized. She blamed Xarelto for her injuries and claimed that the manufacturers didn’t do enough to warn of the drug’s potential dangers.

This was one of about 1,400 cases pending in the Pennsylvania state court mass tort litigation in Philadelphia, and the first to go to trial in that litigation. The trial was briefly delayed because of allegations that sales representatives from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of J&J, met with the plaintiffs’ doctor. The meeting allegedly resulted in a change in the doctor’s testimony.

During the trial, a former FDA commissioner testified that the Xarelto label did not have adequate warnings about its side effects. Bayer and J&J have stated that they plan to appeal the verdict.

Federal Trials Have Been Favoring Defendants

In August 2017, in the third case to go to trial in the Xarelto Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) pending in federal court a Jackson, Mississippi jury determined that the manufacturers of Xarelto were not liable. The plaintiff in that case claimed she suffered serious gastrointestinal bleeding just a month after she started taking Xarelto to prevent blood clots.

Like thousands of other plaintiffs in the Xarelto litigation, she claimed that the drug manufacturers failed to adequately warn about Xarelto’s bleeding risks.

If they had, she claims that she could have avoided her injuries. Her case was one of over 19,000 that are currently pending in the Xarelto MDL, which is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Xarelto Lacks Antidote for Bleeding

 

Xarelto and other newer-generation anticoagulant drugs have no readily available antidote to stop excessive bleeding once it starts.

Whereas patients taking warfarin, the leading blood-thinner for years, can be treated with vitamin K injections, which encourage the blood to begin clotting again, patients taking Xarelto have no such recourse. Patients simply have to wait for Xarelto to flush out of their system. This makes any bleeding events significantly more dangerous and potentially deadly.

TX: doctors filed a class action suit against the narcotics bureau for practicing medicine without a license and the doctors won.

I found out today it’s is the MS Bureau of Narcotics that are pressuring the doctors in this state to cut back. In TX they did the same thing and the doctors filed a class action suit against the narcotics bureau for practicing medicine without a license and the doctors won. After Christmas I’m going to attempt to file a criminal charge against the director of MBN. The doctors here are to scared to do it. I’ve also spoken to the DEA. They are trying to shut down the pill mills but they are NOT interfering with doctors prescribing for real causes like my nerve damage. I’m medically retired Law Enforcement. I don’t mind stirring up a stink when they start messing with my quality of life. Check in your state. Most states have similar laws.The MBN does not have a medical doctor on staff.

More “assisted suicide” by our medical system

My father who was also a physician took his own life because of trigeminal neuralgia. Four days ago a long term friend and former and a former patient of mine shot himself in the head when he was forced by the medical board to taper off the opioids that were keeping him comfortable enough to work productively.

Refusal to fill: is “I’m not comfortable” being replaced with “I don’t have stock” ?

The “excuse” … “I’m not comfortable” infers that the Pharmacist has made a decision… based on certain FACTS that would make the prescription not medically appropriate for a particular pt.  Level one interaction with the pt’s other medications, allergy, dose too high or too low.. having checked a PMP report the pt appears to be a doc/pharmacy shopper…

The “excuse” ….”I don’t have inventory” .. is a fact that supposedly doesn’t have anything associated with a professional medical decision.  I suspect that most pharmacists believe that in saying that.. there is no way for the pt to prove that the pharmacy has – or has not – any inventory.

I was at a meeting of the FL board of Pharmacy in June of 2015 when they were discussing a new regulation about how Pharmacists in FL are suppose to NOT start looking for reason to refuse to fill a controlled prescription.  It went into effect the end of Dec 2015.  At that meeting a chronic pain doctor asked the attorney for the board if a pharmacist lying to a pt about having inventory was UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT…. and basically the response from the Board’s attorney was “.. there is nothing in the practice act that addresses that … so NO …”

After all the DEA cut opiate production quotas by up to 25% in 2017 and proposed another 20% cut in 2018.  The largest pharmacy wholesaler ( McKesson) had the DEA try to build a case against them for not properly controlling the distribution of opiates and prepared to hit them with a ONE BILLION DOLLAR FINE… but apparently McKesson hired the baddest ass attorney firm in the country and the DEA attorneys became unsure of their “slap dunk case” against McKesson and every settle with McKesson paying a few million in fines..  But there were two other major pharmacy wholesalers which the DEA  was probably going after next after they “took down Mc Kesson”… remember the DEA’s budget is TWO BILLION… so a BILLION more from McKesson would have allowed them to do what ?

So, I would expect that the pharmacy wholesalers are going to “tighten down” on what they will allow any particular pharmacy to purchase.

So what is a pt to do?… get use to the “pharmacy crawl” ?

Most pt don’t know that each pharmacy is required to keep a PERPETUAL INVENTORY on all C-II…  They should be able to go to their perpetual inventory book and know exactly what is on hand at any moment. Each prescription filled is entered into this record by date and maybe by the time the label of the prescription was printed… also they have to enter into this perpetual inventory any increase in inventory when they receive it from their supplier.

The pt should at the very least have someone go with them to witness that the reason that your prescription was not filled was because it was stated that they had no inventory… at least take a picture of the Rx dept staff that told you “NO INVENTORY” or if legal.. video the transaction.

The only option that the pt has at this point is to hire an attorney to ask the courts to subpoena the pharmacy’s inventory records for the particular day and the particular medication to validate that there was no inventory on hand… when you presented a prescription to be filled.

Proving that there was medication on hand… and chronic pain pt or any pt suffering from a subjective disease should be considered disabled and discriminating against a person covered by the Americans with Disability Act and/or Civil Rights Act… that discrimination is considered a CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION.

Once a pt has proven that they have been lied to and discriminated against… the Pharmacist and maybe their employer no longer has the UPPER HAND !