Opioid epidemic prompting prescription changes

http://www.dailytimesleader.com/content/opioid-epidemic-prompting-prescription-changes

The opioid epidemic has gotten so bad in Mississippi and other states that doctors are beginning to make their patients sign waivers agreeing to take random drug tests if the doctor suspects the patient may be abusing the drugs or diverting them to others.

It’s one of several changes the state medical licensing board, nursing board and pharmacists are talking about with the Legislature to try to get a handle on the problem.

“We’re trying to get our hands around the problem, looking at all kinds of options,” said Dr. Charles Miles, a West Point gynecologist and obstetrician who is on the State Board of Medical Licensure.
The board is meeting with legislators and other medical groups this week to try to finalize some proposals.

“The problem is people who are in chronic pain, pain that last for more than six months. We are going to ask for a urine screen three times a year to make sure the drugs aren’t being abused one way or the other. If you suspect something is up, like you give a 30-day prescription and they are back in 10 days because the dog ate the pills, then you might ask sooner,” Miles explained of some of the options being considered.

Other changes are limiting prescriptions for pain killers after surgeries to three days or a maximum of 10 days so the doctor can meet with the patient and refill the prescription if needed.

“The problem with opioids is that if you are on them for 20 days or more, the addiction risk increases significantly. And many of the opioid addicts got started with a legitimate prescription. That’s what we are trying to balance and it is a balancing act,” Miles continued, noting the number of opioid prescriptions written in the state dropped 6 percent last year, but the number of pills actually increased.
Some doctors already have taken steps to better monitor their patients. And patients still are adjusting to those changes, setting the stage for reactions as the state debates new rules.

For instance, Columbus resident Brennan Stanford’s doctor recently made her sign a statement agreeing to random drug tests if he suspected she was mishandling her Xanax prescription. He also makes her come in for appointments every two months to get new prescriptions. Up until recently he could write six months worth of prescriptions at a time. But new rules limited that to three months and her doctor has taken it one step further.

“I understand it, I may not necessarily like it, but I understand it,” Stanford said. “I just think it is sad it is coming to things like this, that doctors can’t even use their best judgment.

“And in my case, it means two more trips to the doctor every six months, that’s $50 more in co-pays. Not everyone can afford that,” she continued.

“It sounds like he is just being proactive with all his patients. It’s part of the balancing act,” Miles said of the doctor, noting one of the issues with Xanax is mixing it with potent pain killers like oxycontin, Lortab, and Percoset.

The extra cost is a big issue for others, too.

“I signed it because I had to. And I’ve had friends who are addicts. But there’s got to be a balance somewhere. I can’t afford to pay for extra doctor visits, not with a $40 co-pay. And I probably am better off than some people. I think that is going to be an issue before it’s all said and done,” said Starkville resident Bud Adamson, whose doctor also has imposed stricter prescription guidelines and potential drug testing.

“The drug test is just a nuisance and I doubt I ever will have to take one because I take my medicines like I’m supposed to. But who is going to pay for those extra drug tests? Me, the insurance company? This only adding to medical costs and health care is too expensive as it is. I tell you what, I am a whole lot more careful about keeping my meds locked up or hidden if people are around,” Adamson added.

Those and a number of other questions are being discussed this week in Jackson, Miles said. But addressing a problem that has its roots more than 20 years ago makes it even more difficult.

“In the 1990s, the federal government told doctors we weren’t doing enough to properly treat pain. It became the fifth vital sign. At about the same time, drug companies came out with oxycontin. I can remember reps in my office talking about how it had no side effects, how it was the perfect drug…no side effects other than it is highly addictive. That’s when the opioid crisis got started,” Miles recalled.

The issues behind the opioid are many. But money certainly plays a role. At the pharmacy, an oxycontin tablet is about 25 cents. On the street, a pill sells for $86.

“It’s easy to see why people are stealing them, taking them from their mothers and grandmothers,” Miles said.

Drug enforcement agents welcome the medical community’s involvement.

“That’s where in the long run we can do more to stop the cycle, or at least slow it down. It takes everyone communicating. It may inconvenience some people, but the problem is costing us all right now, trust me. And it’s killing people,” said Capt. Archie Williams, who heads the Lowndes County Drug Task Force.

In addition to prescription limits, drug testing, and increased patient monitoring, other potential changes include more requirements on pharmacies and better cross-referencing among all medical fields — doctors pharmacists, hospitals, and clinics.

“We have a database to check to make sure people aren’t double- or triple-dipping with charities. Certainly we can do the same thing with doctors and pharmacies and prescriptions,” Stanford said in frustration.

“A lot of people are going to have to be part of the solution. But legislators have been very cooperative so far. They understand we have a serious problem,” Miles concluded. 

this quote

“The problem with opioids is that if you are on them for 20 days or more, the addiction risk increases significantly. And many of the opioid addicts got started with a legitimate prescription. That’s what we are trying to balance and it is a balancing act,” Miles continued, noting the number of opioid prescriptions written in the state dropped 6 percent last year, but the number of pills actually increased.

just shows how myopic these people are… It is like we shouldn’t be getting new chronic pain pts every day…

we have 5 + million vehicles accidents every year… 45,000 die.. how many of the survivors will end up being chronic pain pts ?

We have 50,000 suicides – with half being done with a gun – but ONE MILLION attempts… how many attempts end up throwing someone into chronic pain.

How about the Las Vegas shooting 59 killed and 527 injured .. how many of those will end up being chronic pain pts ?

Sure you can approach many/most/all of these people will be dealing with acute pain.. will heal… 1%-2% being exposed to a opiate will cause their undiagnosed mental health disease of addictive personally to come to the surface.. how many are already alcoholics and being exposed to opiates they will discover that they have a new “drug of choice” ?

Assoc representing 300,000 healthcare providers… lining up with those who want to focus on opiate addiction

Pharmacy coalition to Trump administration: Meet with us about opioid crisis

The National Conference of Pharmaceutical Organizations (NCPO), a coalition of organizations representing more than 300,000 pharmacy practitioners, pharmaceutical scientists, pharmacy regulators, and pharmacy educators, has invited the Trump administration to meet to discuss ways of addressing the nation’s opioid crisis. Noting that each day more than 90 Americans die from overdosing on opioids, the coalition, of which APhA is a part, said in a statement that it supports immediate action on components of the report of the President’s Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis.

“We ask the White House and the Administration to work with the pharmacy community to establish and implement specific programs to address this crisis, and to identify specific goals for these programs,” said Lucinda L. Maine, PhD, RPh, executive vice president and CEO of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy and NCPO president.

In a related statement, APhA executive president and CEO Thomas E. Menighan, BSPharm, MBA, ScD (Hon.), FAPhA,  said, “APhA, along with the other NCPO members, is individually and jointly committed to combating this public health crisis as we implement best practices across the country. We believe such collaborative efforts are essential to meeting our country’s needs for high quality health care while working together to reduce the impact of this crisis on American families.”

Menighan highlighted pharmacists’ long-standing contributions in the fight against opioid misuse and abuse. “We work actively with patients and their communities on a daily basis, and APhA’s priority is to make sure that policy makers and our fellow health care providers know what pharmacists can do to make meaningful progress in the fight against opioids.”

 

 

 

According to the statement from the nearly a dozen healthcare organizations representing over 300,000 healthcare providers aligning themselves with those who believe that those who are suffering from the mental health issue of addictive personality are more deserving of appropriate care than the 100+ million chronic pain pts. Basically those with chronic pain are being

LEFT OUT IN THE COLD ?

OPS !!! Fentanyl found in naloxone kit given out at pharmacy

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2018/02/06/fentanyl-found-in-naloxone-kit-a-freak-accident-says-ontario-government.html

Kits used to reverse opiod overdoses that has caused thousands of deaths in recent years.

In what the province is calling an “isolated incident,” fentanyl was found in a naloxone kit assembled at a pharmacy, the Star has learned.

A person received a naloxone kit, which is used to reverse opioid overdoses, on Monday from a Shoppers Drug Mart in an undisclosed location in Ontario, only to find fentanyl inside.

Fentanyl is an opioid that has caused thousands of deaths in recent years, spurring concerns of a crisis across North America.

Opioids are medically used for pain relief, but people have also used them to get high.

In a statement, Shoppers Drug Mart called the incident “a considerable error, and one that absolutely should not have happened.”

The owner-pharmacist retrieved the fentanyl from the customer and apologized, the statement said.

“It is important that customers understand that this isolated event should not reduce their confidence in naloxone kits as an effective response for accidental opioid overdose.”

The Ontario College of Pharmacists is investigating the incident.

“The pharmacy is fully cooperating, and we’re confident that immediate action has been taken to begin to determine how it happened and what could have been done to prevent it,” said college spokesperson Todd Leach.

“We are not aware of similar incidents happening at any other pharmacies.”

According to multiple pharmacists at Shoppers Drug Mart across the GTA, the pharmacies order the components of the kit and assemble them in house.

“In most pharmacies, there is no access to fentanyl,” Laura Gallant, press secretary for Ontario’s ministry of health, said in a phone interview.

She said the pharmacy that gave away the kit with fentanyl inside had the opioid because it is close to a hospice where the drug is sometimes administered.

“This was an isolated incident at one location only and there is no known risk to the public,” she said in a statement.

Naloxone can be administered through injection or nasal spray, and kits are available for free at pharmacies, shelters and community agencies across the province.

The province distributed about 80,000 kits last year. At least 1,460 Canadians died from apparent opioid-related deaths in the first half of 2017, according to the latest report from the Public Health Agency of Canada.

Between July and September 2017, there were 2,449 emergency department visits related to opioid overdoses in Ontario.

In August, the province invested $222 million into fighting the opioid crisis. This year, the province began providing naloxone kits to police and fire services.

AG Sesssion: take two ASPIRIN and just SUCK IT UP .. don’t call anyone !

U.S. Attorney General Talks Opioid Crisis: ‘Take Some Aspirin’

http://wusfnews.wusf.usf.edu/post/us-attorney-general-talks-opioid-crisis-take-some-aspirin

As he addressed a crowd of prosecutors and police officers at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida, Sessions offered his opinion for preventing addiction.

“I believe – and I am operating under the assumption – that this country prescribes too many opioids,” he said. “I mean people need to take some aspirin sometimes and tough it out a little.”

Some people in the crowd laughed. Sessions then imitated Gen. John Kelly, President Trump’s chief of staff, whom the attorney general says refused to take pain medication after a recent surgery on his hand.

“He said, ‘I’m not taking any drugs!’” said Sessions. “It did hurt though, he did admit it hurt. But a lot of people, you can get through these things.”

Sessions says stopping addiction before it starts is the most important element in the nation’s fight against opioids.

He outlined ways the federal Drug Enforcement Agency is working to curb addiction. Sessions says the DEA announced earlier this week that the agency will now ask individual practitioners applying for licenses or renewing their licenses whether they have received continuing education on prescribing and dispensing opioids.

“DEA can ensure that doctors have the CDC’s latest guidance on opioid prescribing so they don’t accidently over-prescribe,” Sessions said.

Florida Gov. Rick Scott and some members of the state legislature are pushing for a three-day cap on opioid prescriptions, and a seven-day cap when medically necessary.

But opponents of the bill, including many physicians, say those limits are unreasonable for people in intense pain, like those recovering from major surgery.

While Florida has cracked down on pill mills notorious for pumping out unnecessary prescription drugs, the state is still one of the hardest hit by the opioid crisis.

During his remarks in Tampa, Sessions suggested the rise in fentanyl sold on the streets is to blame.

“Fentanyl-related deaths [in Florida] jumped 97 percent [from 2015-2016],” he said. “So the driving factor, you can see in Florida maybe more than in the nation, is fentanyl.”

Sessions told members of law enforcement in the audience that as of Tuesday, all fentanyl-related substances would become scheduled on an emergency basis by the DEA.

“Fentanyl is the No.1 killer in America,” he said. “Scheduling and restricting all forms of this drug will make it easier for you and your agents to prosecute drug traffickers.”

Over the summer Sessions deemed central Florida one of 12 opioid “hot spots” in America. That led to the appointment of Kelly Howard-Allen, who has been with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Tampa for more than 15 years, as the area’s “opioid fraud prosecutor.”

Howard-Allen will focus solely on investigating and prosecuting opioid-related health care fraud. Sessions said her new position allowed the office in Tampa to hire another assistant U.S. attorney, Greg Pizzo.

 

Congress Let an Important Disability Rights Program Expire — Now People Are Trapped In Institutions

Handicapped Parking Spot

https://www.aclu.org/blog/disability-rights/integration-and-autonomy-people-disabilities/congress-let-important

Imagine spending your life under someone else’s control, having to ask for permission each time you wanted to go out to eat, invite someone over, stay out late, or use the internet. For many Americans, this is their reality. Life in institutions and nursing homes often involves severe deprivations of the basic freedoms others take for granted. People with disabilities deserve better.

Over the course of the last several decades, the disability rights movement has fought to expand home and community-based services that assist people with disabilities to transition from institutions to the community. The 1999 US Supreme Court case, Olmstead v. LC, found that holding people in institutions, when they want to live in the community and can medically do so, is unnecessary segregation. Doing so violates both the Americans with Disabilities Act and our constitutional liberties.

The expansion of Medicaid home and community-based services offers people with disabilities a meaningful alternative to institutionalization. Now Congress has an opportunity to expand access to this vital pathway to freedom and independence.

Since 2005, the Money Follows the Person program has been a crucial resource for people with disabilities, supporting the transition of over 75,000 individuals with disabilities into their communities across 44 states. These transitions represent an opportunity for true integration after extended periods within the restrictive and regimented environments of nursing homes and institutions.

Money Follows the Person participants report significant and lasting improvements in quality of life and integration after returning to the community. In addition, their costs to Medicare and Medicaid decrease by approximately 20 percent. This represents an opportunity to improve a beneficiary’s quality of life and freedom of choice, while helping to control long-term Medicaid cost-growth.

Unfortunately, Money Follows the Person expired on Sept. 30, 2016, and states are running out of funding. Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) have introduced legislation to reauthorize the program for five years. The EMPOWER Care Act would ensure that states continue to have access to the federal funding they need to transition people into the community. 

Last summer, the ACLU joined forces with disability rights advocates to defend the Medicaid program. We recognize that for the disability community it’s not just a health care program — it is the vehicle that allows people to live independently instead of in a nursing home or institution.

Opening the door to community life can be a costly proposition for states, but the federal funding from Money Follows the Person can help bridge that gap and allow people with disabilities to enjoy community living. Congress should act today to reauthorize this program by passing the bi-partisan EMPOWER Care Act. Every person deserves a chance to life in freedom on their own terms.

CMS Pushing 7-Day Limit on Initial Opioid Scripts

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/892412

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is proposing that beginning in 2019, initial opioid prescriptions for acute pain be limited to 7 days.

The agency is also suggesting in the 2018 Draft Call Letter that Medicare Part D prescription drug plans monitor patients who take medications considered to be “potentiators” of opioid misuse and opioid-related adverse events — specifically, gabapentin and pregabalin.

 

Noting an alarming increase in gabapentin use to treat pain and concurrent opioid and gabapentin use, CMS is asking for comment on whether it is useful to more closely monitor beneficiaries receiving these prescriptions.

The CMS proposal came as a US House committee took a closer look at Medicare’s oversight of opioid use. At the February 6 hearing, members of the Ways and Means Health Subcommittee said there are few data on opioid use among older Americans and that Medicare has done a poor job of encouraging prevention and treatment.

 

“With 10,000 baby boomers joining Medicare each day, we must harness innovation, technology and data to get ahead of this problem,” said Subcommittee Chairman Peter Roskam (R-IL). “Unfortunately, there is a lack of available data regarding the Medicare population and the extent to which opioid abuse, overprescribing, and diversion is an issue for seniors and the disabled,” he said.

 

That echoed an October 2017 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, which found that Part D plans are not sufficiently identifying and helping beneficiaries at high risk for opioid misuse. CMS established its overutilization monitoring system (OMS) in 2013, but opioid misuse continues, and thousands of baby boomers are being added to the Medicare rolls daily.

Drugs of Concern

The agency said in its latest announcement that the system has reduced “very high risk overutilization of prescription opioids in the Part D program,” but “given the urgency and scope of the continuing national prescription opioid epidemic, we will propose new strategies to more effectively address this issue for patients in Part D.”

 
 

CMS proposes the following:

  • To have the OMS identify high-risk beneficiaries who use “potentiator” drugs (such as gabapentin and pregabalin) in combination with prescription opioids to ensure that plans provide appropriate case management. The agency noted in its proposal that in just 2 years (2015 to 2017), the rate of gabapentin users in Part D plans increased by 14%: from 93 to 108 users per 1000 enrollees. Opioid users had even higher gabapentin use.
  • To create a new quality measure that would track how well Part D plans flag concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines. The OMS already flags concurrent benzodiazepine use, but there is no follow-up mechanism. According to CMS, in late 2016, when the OMS began tracking concurrent use, 64% of beneficiaries flagged as potential opioid overusers had a benzodiazepine prescription. In 2017, after monitoring, the number had dropped to 62%.
  • That Part D plans to have a pharmacy point-of-sale edit that prohibits dispensing of any prescription that is more than a 90 morphine milligram equivalent, or a 7-day supply.
  • That all sponsors implement soft point-of-sale edits that alert when there is duplicative therapy of multiple long-acting opioids.

CMS is taking comments on the proposal until March 5 and will publish the final requirements on April 2.

The Part D proposal builds on another CMS proposed rule, issued in December 2017. The agency was required by the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act of 2016 to beef up opioid oversight.

 

As with that previous regulation, the newest proposal would exempt patients with cancer, in hospice, or in long-term care facilities from much of the strict oversight. 

Methadone Treatment Not Covered

Even as enrollees who misuse opioids are flagged, Medicare is not fully prepared to help. The federal health program does not pay for outpatient methadone treatment, for instance.

“We know there are significant gaps in access and coverage under Medicare,” said the top Democrat on the Ways and Means Health Subcommittee, Richard Neal (MA), at the hearing.

 Neal introduced a bill in October 2017 — the Medicare Beneficiary Opioid Addiction Treatment Act — that would require Medicare to pay for outpatient methadone therapy. 
 Neal and Democratic colleague Frank Pallone (NJ) also have written to 14 Medicare Advantage and Part D drug plans asking them to share their evidence-based best practices.
 “The growth of Medicare Part D spending on opioids far outpaces the growth in enrollment, having increased 165 percent from 2006 to 2015,” said Neal and Pallone. They said that among the 12 million Medicare enrollees who were prescribed opioids in 2015, “the average beneficiary received five prescriptions for commonly abused opioids.”

YOUR PHARMACIST DOESN’T WANT TO SEE YOU NOW

http://www.thecabin.net/news/20180206/your-pharmacist-doesnt-want-to-see-you-now

If your pharmacist doesn’t look happy to see you the next time you visit, it’s probably because she’s losing money filling your prescription.

The problems are occurring with two groups of patients. The largest are those covered by Arkansas Works, which uses Medicaid dollars to purchase private health insurance for 285,000 low-income Arkansans. The other problem patients are the 68,100 Arkansans who purchase their health insurance through the online Arkansas Health Insurance Marketplace. Like Arkansas Works, the Marketplace was created by the Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare.

Pharmacists say that, in those plans, they aren’t being fairly reimbursed by their pharmacy benefit managers. Those PBMs act as middlemen between pharmacists and insurance companies, which in Arkansas are Blue Cross, Ambetter and QualChoice.

If you’re thinking that insurance companies are supposed to be the middlemen, well, so did I. But as big as the insurers are, they’re not as big as the three PBMs that control the pharmaceutical market nationwide. The insurance companies pay the PBMs, and the PBMs reimburse the pharmacists while subtracting what’s supposed to be an administrative fee. That’s how your pharmacist gets paid.

The PBM that contracts with Blue Cross and Ambetter is CVS Caremark – the same CVS that owns your local drugstore and is buying Aetna, one of the nation’s largest insurers. A spokesperson released a statement saying it reimburses pharmacies at “competitive rates that balance the need to fairly compensate pharmacies while providing a cost-effective benefit for our clients.”

More than 300 pharmacists attended a legislative subcommittee meeting last week to voice their disagreement with that assertion. Earle pharmacist Cissy Clark said more than 22 percent of her prescriptions are for Arkansas Works patients, and she’s losing money on a “large portion.” She said one pregnant mother and her two sick children came into her pharmacy with three prescriptions for generic Tamiflu, which costs Clark $87 wholesale. The children were covered by traditional Medicaid with a reasonable reimbursement. For the mother, Clark was going to be reimbursed $36.23 by CVS Caremark. When Clark called Ambetter, she was told the insurer had paid $132.61 to the PBM, “which means that CVS made almost $100 while I lost 50,” Clark said. She eventually managed to work it out by filling a liquid version of the prescription and received a fair reimbursement.

In one sense, the system did its job by moving the mother to a lower cost drug. But that was an awful lot of running around to do for any business transaction – particularly a pharmacist trying to serve a family with sick kids. And there should be no situation in a market economy where the middleman takes that big of a cut.

State law does require the PBMs to allow pharmacists to appeal their reimbursements and ultimately have their costs covered. But of course, that means your busy, white-coated pharmacist has to go to war with a giant bureaucracy. Clark said she filed 65 appeals in the first week of this year alone and had not received any responses.

 

Arkansas Works and the Health Insurance Marketplace both were created by Obamacare, but the problems run much deeper. In America, health care is a profit-making enterprise, but it’s based on perverse incentives where the sellers make more money managing our illness than they do if they make us well. The payment system is a complex web of insurance companies, PBMs, big government agencies and other faceless middlemen. Their job is to shield us from the cost of our transactions. For that, they take a huge piece of the pie. Then there’s the fact that Americans have fundamentally unhealthy lifestyles. Being unhealthy is expensive.

 

Repeal the law, and the underlying issues will remain.

So what now? Pharmacy reimbursements will continue to be an issue in Arkansas politics. Nationally, Congress will continue to talk about health care but do little about it.

Last week, Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan Chase announced they were jointly forming a new health care company to serve their employees. They didn’t offer many details because they don’t know what the company will look like. But it will be different.

Can these big businesses fix the big business of health care? At least, they can disrupt it. CVS’ stock fell 4.9 percent after the announcement.

Regardless, it’s going to take a while, and pharmacists are losing money now – or at least waiting on appeals.

when I first started working in pharmacies – late 60’s – there were virtually no generics… everything was a brand name… there was no PBM’s… and everyone PAID CASH… there was no Medicare to pay for prescriptions and Medicaid paid for a very small number… and the average prescription price was $4.00 -$5.00…

Today abt 90% of all prescriptions are generics, PMB’s price/pay/process about 90% of prescriptions and the average prescription price is pushing $60

If you apply the CPI from those days in the 60’s until today… and presuming that nothing else changed from what it was in the late 60’s..the average prescription price should be around $30 +/-. 

And just what contributed to that EXTRA $30 per prescription ?  Generics are suppose to save everyone money…

What they don’t talk about in this article and other places… these PBM’s DEMAND rebates/kickbacks etc.. from the pharmaceutical manufacturers … you may have been told that your insurance company wont’ pay for a particular medication that your doc wrote for but would pay for a “similar medication”… what they don’t tell you is that the PBM gets a LARGER kickback/rebate from the manufacturer’s product on the PBM’s formulary.  All of these “players” in the medication business are FOR-PROFIT businesses and isn’t it comforting that their decisions on what medication that you get to take – that can have a positive/negative outcome on your quality of life… is highly determined on the profitability of the insurance & PBM companies..

Here is one example of how profits by insurance/PBM come to play in your quality of life

Health insurer Anthem has sued Express Scripts Holding Co., alleging the pharmacy benefits manager is not passing along billions of dollars in savings from negotiated drug prices.

Pill peril: How pharmacists make sure you get the right medication

http://www.thv11.com/news/health/pill-peril-how-pharmacists-make-sure-you-get-the-right-medication/515122789

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (KTHV) — If you take medication every day, you’re part of the majority of Americans, but how do you know what you’re prescribed and what you’re given is correct? Mistakes happen. THV11 looked into what we can do to avoid medication errors

Eighty-two percent of American adults take at least one medication a day according to the Centers for Disease Control. This keeps pharmacists filling prescriptions all day.

“Per pharmacist probably 125 or 150 prescriptions a day,” said Philip Way, a pharmacist at Remedy Drug.

What if you were handed the wrong prescription? Or what if your doctor accidentally prescribed you the wrong medicine?

“Everyday the pharmacist is working to correct dosage,” said Dr. Scott Pace, CEO of the Arkansas Pharmacists Association.

Many of you know firsthand the possible mistakes that can happen when it comes to receiving your medicine.

“I once received the wrong birth control pills,” one viewer said.

“I was given someone else’s pills in my bottle,” another said.

“I once noticed my dad’s refill looked different. He started to fall and not remember anything,” said another viewer claiming he was given the wrong prescription.

“The right drug at the wrong dose can be prescribed, the wrong instructions can be prescribed, it can be misinterpreted at the pharmacy level,” Pace said. “A lot of selection errors have happened.”

Pace believes technology has created a new opportunity for error.

“We’ve moved away from a lot of handwritten prescriptions to electronic prescriptions,” Pace said.

When doctors send prescriptions electronically, if they click the wrong medication, the pharmacist won’t know it’s a mistake.

“It’s the technology that sometimes is changing what used to be a simple paper process and turning it into something on a computer and it’s a different workflow so with that workflow is a new opportunity for different errors,” Pace said.

“Rarely does it appear here,” Way said.

He puts prescriptions through a triple screening process to make sure those mistakes don’t happen.

“There’s a process of data entry.”

So when he gets your prescription, he reviews the patient, the doctor, and what else the patient is taking. He finds the medicine off the shelf, counts the pills, bottles them, then checks again

“Making sure the right medicines on the bottle, the right drug is on the label, the right doctor is on the label and that the patient is not already taking it or taking something that would interfere with it,” Way said.

Every year, the CDC reports more than one million emergency department visits come from adverse drug events. That’s any harm that comes from the use of medication like allergic reactions, side effects, over medication, and medication errors.

“If it’s a drug allergy they could have a reaction and depending on who they’re surrounded by and how they know how to react to that, it could be fatal,” Way said.

The final step to make sure you’re getting the right medicine is conversation.

“Communication is very important to us at the pharmacy level,” Way said. “Tell them what’s going on with your health care. They’re going to protect that information, but they need to know if you just had a baby, if you got over an infection.”

“If the color looks different than it did last month, ask. If the shape looks different, ask. If the directions look different, ask,” Pace said.

Scott Pace believes some errors come from drugs that sound alike or with similar names. The Food and Drug Administration reviews about 300 drug names a year before they’re marketed, with about a third rejected to minimize confusion.

If the pt presents a prescription and there is no drug allergy, drug interaction, or other contraindications that would suggest that the Pharmacist should not fill the prescription… but.. the pharmacist because of some personal opinion, bias , prejudiced or phobia the pharmacist refuses to fill the prescription.  Won’t give the pt a valid reason… just … NO…

Is there that much difference between a pt walking away from the pharmacy counter with the WRONG MEDICATION and the pt walking away from the pharmacy counter WITHOUT the medication that their doc had determined they had a medical necessity for…

Both pts are walking away from the pharmacy counter without the medication that their doc wanted them to have.

My money is on that if both pts filed a complaint with the state pharmacy board…the board would take some sort of punitive action against the pharmacist for giving the pt the wrong medication and it is highly unlikely they would take any action against the pharmacist for refusing to fill a legit/on time/medically necessary prescription.

In 2016, the KY board of pharmacy reported it received 15 complaints for denial of care – refusing to fill a legit/on time/medically necessary prescription and 14 complaints were dismissed without further action.  One can only surmise that for every complaint filed with the board over denial of care there was probably 100 – 1000 more incidents that the pt didn’t bother to file a complaint.

FDA Takes New Steps to Mitigate Opioid Overprescribing

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/892135

As part of its ongoing efforts to address the opioid crisis, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has released a revised blueprint containing core content for training that drug manufacturers are required to make available to opioid prescribers.

“The revised Blueprint broadens content to include information on acute and chronic pain management, safe use of opioids or other non-opioid or non-drug treatments, as well as material on addiction medicine and opioid use disorders,” the FDA said.

When finalized later this year, coupled with the Opioid Analgesic Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, the blueprint will apply to manufacturers of both immediate-release opioid analgesics intended for use in the outpatient setting and extended-release/long-acting formulations. For the first time, the FDA is requiring that the guidance be offered to healthcare professionals who are involved in the management of patients with pain, including nurses and pharmacists, in addition to prescribers.

“With millions of Americans misusing prescription opioids and more than 40 people dying every day from overdoses involving opioid medications, it has become abundantly clear that we need to do everything we can, along with our partners, to get ahead of this crisis,” FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, said in a statement.

 

“Appropriate prescribing practices and education are important steps within our statutory authority to help address the human and financial toll of this crisis. We can and must do more to arm physicians — who are the gatekeepers of prescription opioids — with the most current and comprehensive guidance on the appropriate management of pain. The Blueprint is one tool for achieving these goals,” he added.

Dr Gottlieb said the FDA will continue to seek feedback from a “broad group of stakeholders and explore a range of approaches that, when combined with other steps we’re taking to tackle this epidemic, help ensure proper treatment for pain and better addresses the crisis of opioid addiction.”

 According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, opioids — including prescription opioids, heroin, and fentanyl — killed more than 42,000 people in 2016, more than any year on record. Forty percent of all opioid overdose deaths involve a prescription opioid.

42,000 deaths… what happened to the 64,000 deaths everyone else is using… does this CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE that there is 22,000 drug overdose deaths are caused by NON-OPIATE medications?

Claiming 40% of all OD’s are from prescription opiates… still does not clarify if the person ODing had legally been prescribed the prescription opiates.. Still no reference how many of these OD’s were in fact SUICIDES…

The USA has 50,000 suicides/yr with ONE MILLION attempts…   from this article https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/07/21/guns-most-deadly-choice-in-suicide-attempts/2572097/  

Guns are used in about half of U.S. suicides

and what is the cause of the other HALF of suicides??? BUTTER KNIFES…. ???   I guess that it is a little more obvious about a person committing suicide by shooting themselves with a gun as opposed to take all their meds and add in a little/lot of alcohol to help assure to “get the job done”…

Are the “powers that be” so mis-focused on drug overdoses that when a opiate shows up in toxicology it is automatically concluded to be a “accidental drug overdose”… is this why the nomenclature has been changed that all deaths when toxicology shows a opiate… no further investigation needs to be done.. just label the death as a “opiate related death”

A lot of people want to talk about FAKE NEWS… but who talks about PSEUDO-FACTS…

 

Addiction psychiatrist questions involuntary tapering of opioids

http://www.wjhl.com/local/addiction-psychiatrist-questions-involuntary-tapering-of-opioids/943940749

JOHNSON CITY, TN (WJHL) – A renowned author and addiction psychiatrist says the efforts of the Department of Veterans Affairs and other institutions across the country to taper people off opioids without their consent is “an outrage.”

“To take a patient who’s doing well off of medication abruptly and without their permission is not unfair. I actually think it’s malpractice,” Dr. Sally Satel said. “I think it is an outrage when you have a person who’s doing well on a dose of medication, highly functional and their pain is under good control. This is what you want. This is the clinical outcome.”

Dr. Satel is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and a lecturer at Yale University. She’s a vocal opponent of the involuntary tapering of controlled opioids.

“It shouldn’t be done without their permission,” she said. “Without the patient’s consent, the results are often disasterous.”

Mountain Home VA Medical Center is prescribing half as many opioids as it did in 2012, according to recently released federal data. Since December 2016, several veterans have voiced their frustration over what they’ve said is a mandate to taper their pain medications.

Dr. Satel says many institutions have misinterpreted the Centers for Disease Control’s pain management guidelines as mandates rather than recommendations.

“It doesn’t say anything about taking people off their medications if they don’t want to go off of it,” Dr. Satel said. “Of course, it’s frustrating, especially when it’s misinterpreted in the direction of poor patient care. It’s very frustrating.”

For decades, VA and other doctors have prescribed pain medications because they thought, at the time, that’s what patients needed. However, in recent years, they changed their approach when new research found opioids can be dangerous and ineffective.

“I understand their fear, their anxiety and their anger, but I want them to understand this is driven by our concern for their safety,” Mountain Home VA Opiate Safety Initiative Chairman Dr. Martin Eason said in December 2016.

Most recently, Mountain Home VA Chief of Staff Dr. David Hecht said the facility is proud of its 49% decrease in opioid prescriptions since 2012. He added, doctors consider every patient’s need on a case-by-case basis and taper veterans off opioids in a safe way.

“Many veterans have really understood and bought into it and it has helped us,” Dr. Hecht said. “Any time we reduce these medications, we want to reduce them in a safe environment.”

The VA maintains it has taken patients off opioids gradually and given veterans the opportunity to appeal their tapering decisions. The agency adds while opioids may help with short-term pain, they are not approved to treat chronic pain in non-cancer patients. Mountain Home is now encouraging veterans to try safer and more effective alternatives.

As we reported earlier this month, VA representatives plan to discuss preliminary data that show a link between opioid discontinuation and suicides at an upcoming summit. Dr. Satel has authored several published works alongside one of those speakers.