People are using bug spray to get high and it’s really dangerous

https://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/indianapolis/people-are-using-bug-spray-to-get-high-and-its-really-dangerous

INDIANAPOLIS — In a state where drug overdoses continue to rise, people are finding new ways to get high and emergency crews are warning about one of the latest dangerous trends: bug spray. 

Indianapolis firefighters are making several runs a day because of someone suspected of abusing bug spray, a form of what’s known as KD. 

Indianapolis Fire Department Captain Chris Major said the person just sprays the bug spray onto an item, rolls it up and smokes it and it doesn’t take much for a person to have a severe reaction. 

Some of the symptoms of KD include the patient being catatonic, unable to walk or breathe, hardly speaking or vomiting among dozens of others. 

“Kind of like a zombie,” said Captain Major. “We started describing it like zombielike, where they might be eating the grass that they’re lying in or they are tearing at their clothes.”

The Director of Indiana Poison Center at IU Health Dr. Daniel Rusyniak says the biggest problem is how easily accessible bug spray is to anyone of any age. 

“They no longer have to drive to a shady street corner,” said Dr. Rusyniak. “They can get on the internet and they can order this and it can be delivered to their house by Amazon.”

It’s also becoming popular because it’s one of the many synthetic drugs that can’t be detected on a standard drug test. 

“If you think, ‘well my school is doing drug testing so I don’t have to worry about my kid’ well, some of the drug testings may steer kids into using a lot more of these synthetic type drugs because they’re not detected,” said Dr. Rusyniak. 

And although the trend seems to plague the east side, Dr. Rusyniak says they’ve treated people of all ages and backgrounds for abuse of synthetic drugs and anyone can fall victim to using them. 

“You just kind of wonder what’s going to be the next thing,” said Dr. Rusyniak. “If they’re doing this now, what are they going to do next?”

 

 

Forgotten Victims of America’s Opoid Crisis

www.harpers.org/archive/2018/04/the-pain-refugees/

 

 

what you don’t see WILL COST YOU…

You know when you buy/pay premiums for insurance … you sort of expect to get some coverage…  Barb has been on the same Part D program since it started in 2006.. Originally it was a company owned by the National Association of Chain Drugs Stores (NACDS) and National Community Pharmacists Association ( NCPA)..  but the program changed hands several times over the years and ended up several years ago being owned by CVS Health.

Barb went on Medicare Disability in 1996 and for nearly 10 yrs she had no prescription insurance,  I had to become accustomed to paying out $2,000 – $3,000 for a 90 days supply of her meds. Once she got the Part D insurance, I would get her meds filled the first week of Jan – 90 days supply  and she would then be in the “donut hole”..  filling them again the first week of April and she would be in the catastrophic level… where her co-pays were only 5% for the balance of the year.

Over the years, as her brand name meds became available generically, the out of pocket co-pays continued to be less – by and large.  She had a couple of meds that had PA’s and/or had been dropped from they formulary, but I had managed to get them to be covered. So as the end of a year came and went, we stayed on the same program.

This year, I noticed that her co-pays seemed to be MUCH HIGHER…  what was $15-$20 co-pays now were $30 – $60 co-pays. I started really reading the pharmacy receipts and they put on there what the insurance paid and I was seeing a lot of receipts with SILVER SCRIPTS PAYING $0.00. In fact, in 2018 out of 13 Rxs… SILVER SCRIPTS paid $0.00 on ELEVEN OF THEM..

So I went to SILVER SCRIPTS website and downloaded Barb’s medication records for 2017 and 2018… and put them on a spread sheet.

In 2017, there were 37 prescriptions.. and SILVER SCRIPTS paid just at 50% of the total.  When I totaled up 2018… SILVER SCRIPTS paid abt 15%… since all but one of Barb’s medications in 2018 was the same as in 2017.  I was basically comparing apples to apples.

After digging a little deeper, it would appear that the independent pharmacy that we use.. is not one of their “preferred pharmacies”… in fact the county in which we live – population about 80,000 there are only TWO PREFERRED PHARMACIES… BOTH CVS’.. about 8 miles from our house and they are about 3 blocks apart… on one of the busiest and congested roads int the county, one is a former Target pharmacy, and her co-pays would be LESS, up to 40% less..  if I went to one of their PREFERRED PHARMACIES. In fact, in three adjacent counties, there is only TWO INDEPENDENT PHARMACIES that are part of their preferred pharmacy network.

Apparently, in previous years, rural pharmacies were automatically included in their preferred network. The independent pharmacy that we use, is the only pharmacy in about 5 miles.. about 2 miles from our house and if I can’t get out… Barb doesn’t drive anymore.. .they would deliver prescriptions to our home.

Digging some more, I found that if we paid twice as much monthly premiums, – a “different plan” .. that their PREFERRED PHARMACY NETWORK… included most of the chain pharmacies in the county, but not the independent pharmacy that we prefer to patronize.

Normally under Medicare/Medicaid… prices/allowables are FIXED and pts have a freedom of choice of providers. There is no such thing as “preferred providers”… the provider either participates in Medicare/Medicaid or they don’t. Is CVS HEALTH/CAREMARK/SILVER SCRIPTS making up their own rules as they go along ?

I was under the impression that Medicare Part D was suppose to be moving towards a straight 75%/25% or 80%/20% payments by 2020 and Pres Trump stated today on TV that Seniors were going to start paying LESS for their medications…  Maybe SILVER SCRIPTS has raised prices so that they can claim to have lowered them when the President makes them go lower ?

I intend to make some phone calls..

Trump: ADDICTION IS NOT OUR FUTURE…

This morning I had Fox Business on and Dr Marc Siegel was on Varney & Co… Apparently Dr Siegel has been indoctrinated by someone who is on “team Trump”… but.. I did notice that on most statements that he made he put a “qualifier” on his statements… “.. this will work sometime…”… ” I think that this will work..”.. he stated that a recent studied indicated that IBUPROFEN was as effected as opiates… most people that… that study was a “JUNK STUDY “…and was still using the 250 million opiate Rxs being prescribed/dispensed… when the latest figure – that I have seen – is 215 million. And he stated that Trump wants opiate prescriptions reduced by 1/3 – ANOTHER 70 MILLION GONE ???

After that show.. I went out to run some errands and when I got back a couple of hrs later, I flipped on the TV and there is TRUMP… who is proposing to “execute drug dealers”.. and who is going to be the judge, jury and executor ? the DEA… we know that they only go after those who they have very SOLID evidence that they are, in fact, prescribing/dispensing opiates excessively. NOT !!!

Then Trump pulled up a couple who lost their young son to a Heroin overdose.. and his Mother admitted that he started taking opiates out of the family’s medicine cabinet and moved on to street drugs and OD. If those opiates were not prescribed to him.. then the opiates that he started experimenting with… were ILLEGAL OPIATES… just like those bought on the street, or was robbed from a pharmacy… but that really didn’t seem to make much of a difference to those in attendance. All that seemed to matter was at ONE TIME.. they were legal pharmaceutical opiates.

Somewhere along the line ..TRUMP stated that we were going to have a “addiction free generation”… My only thought was… “what has he been smoking…” ?

I hate it that there is a growing “roar” of vote the Republicans out.. has anyone noticed that there seems to be TWO PLAY BOOKS… one for the party in the majority and another one for the party in the minority and they just seem to “play their role” depending if they are in the majority or the minority.

In the longer term, it doesn’t seem to do much by kicking one of the two political parties out of the majority and put the other one in… Is it time for putting a NEW THIRD POLITICAL PARTY IN POWER ?

If he loses his job we will lose everything and his disease will progress

My husband has worked as maintenance for over 20yrs and been on fmla disability for most that time.he has iracnoiditis and degenerative disc disease. And has had kidney failer when he was 18 and suffered permanent damage from that and can’t take ibuprofen or anything that could effect his kidneys.he has went to neurosurgens and they recommended fentenyal he tried it and couldn’t take side effects. So his doctor put him on morphine and has been on high doses stable for years.even with his meds he has flare ups and has to take up to 4 days a month off.now the insurance he pays for tried to cut him to 1 3rd of what he used to take.we filed 1st appeal and they only gave him half of what he was stable on for only 2 months.he has become depressed stressed and defeated.he just wants to support his family. How can they have the power to hold his job over his head.he does nothing outside of work now and is starting to miss days and we can’t afford it.he supports 2 family’s.someone has to do something he cannot have any quality of life without pain relief. If he loses his job we will lose everything and his disease will progress.there is no cure for his disease so that means its pallative. We are in constant fear of our lives falling apart. This is not his fault that he has a disability and he should be allowed to support his family.

Attorney general objects to proposed distribution of settlement funds

https://www.wvgazettemail.com/news/cops_and_courts/attorney-general-objects-to-proposed-distribution-of-settlement-funds/article_8fa2f492-5523-5cc9-9700-cd8c4ca79426.html

The West Virginia Attorney General’s office has filed an objection to the distribution of money from a settlement with a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.

Kanawha Circuit Judge Duke Bloom was on pace to approve the distribution of West Virginia’s share of a $33 million settlement by Feb. 23, but Douglas Davis, representing the DWI Guys serving all of Syracuse and nearby areas general’s office objected to how that money was going to be spent.

West Virginia was one of 42 states to reach the settlement with McNeil-PPC Inc. in May 2017, and the state is set to get $441,277.96, according to court documents.

 

The lawsuit alleged McNeil-PPC Inc. illegally promoted their over-the-counter drugs ( Medications involved included Tylenol, Motrin, Benadryl, St. Joseph Aspirin, Sudafed, Pepcid, Mylanta, Rolaids, Zyrtec and Zyrtec Eye Drops. )as meeting federal standards for manufacturing, when there were significant issues with the drugs’ quality and effectiveness, Attorney General Patrick Morrisey said when he announced the settlement. You should be planning out your estate for a better future.

In a proposed order to distribute the funds, nearly $400,000 would go to the West Virginia University College of Law for a program to develop a program to train law students(see more) to assist with drug and consumer related issues, Douglas said in the objection. You can get discrimination lawyers in Fresno if you are going through some issue.

Instead of sending settlement money to WVU’s law school, Douglas recommended the settlement be paid to the West Virginia Center for Drug and Health Information, which is operated by WVU’s School of Pharmacy. You can continue reading here about the accident attorneys.

Nick Casey, former chief of staff for Gov. Jim Justice, is the guardian ad litem in the case, meaning he’s in charge of reviewing the proposed judgment and distribution of the funds.

In a previous report, Casey outright rejected sending the money to the law school.

Casey most recently filed a report in the case on March 13.

In the latest report, Casey said sending the money to WVU’s law school wouldn’t be the best use of the funds, saying the proposed law program wouldn’t “result in one support of individual consumers of medication.”

 

Casey additionally suggests settlement money could be distributed to programs run through the University of Charleston School of Pharmacy and the West Virginia Board of Medicine.

Casey said the settlement would be most beneficial to West Virginians if it’s used to support programs “where there is regular interaction with citizens of West Virginia on a diverse array of health and medication issues.”

Casey supports the attorney general’s office taking costs and reasonable attorney’s fees from the settlement amount, but he argues that the rest of the settlement money should not go to the attorney general’s consumer protection fund. know what one can do legally after getting injured by someone else.

The West Virginia Legislature has the ability to move money from that fund to the state’s general revenue fund. As of Casey’s March 13 filing, that fund had more than $11 million, Casey said in his report.

Once attorney’s fees and other costs are taken out of the $441,277.96 settlement, Casey said the total consumer recovery was represented as being $96,000.

As of Thursday, no hearing had been scheduled in the case.

The attorney general’s office subtracted their “reasonable attorney’s fees and office costs”… leaving 96,000 – about 20% of the total settlement – and was UNHAPPY because the remainder wasn’t going to a LAW SCHOOL… but proposed to be sent to a Board of Medicine and Pharmacy school to deal with “health issues” within the state.  Once again, the law profession demonstrates that it is self-serving ?

Quantifying the Epidemic of Prescription Opioid Overdose Deaths

http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304265

Free first page

 

Just remember the number in the first paragraph.. of the 64K overdose deaths that they always throw around 66.4% involves opiates…  it is claimed that NSAID’s kill 15,000/yr.. but.. a lot of people – in talking about opiate deaths – like to throw out that 64K overdose deaths and never explains that they are not all opiate related deaths..

The authors of this article want a better stat on pharmaceutical grade of opiates vs illegal opiates… what they also ignore.. is that once a opiate gets into the hand of someone other than who it was legally prescribed for.. it becomes an ILLEGAL OPIATE.  Doesn’t make any difference if they got them from a friend’sa legal prescription, robbed a pharmacy or bought them on the street… THEY ARE ILLEGAL OPIATES and needs to be counted as such in opiate related deaths.

when no one follows the rules… pts suffers ?

Hello Sir, 

 

I don’t know if you remember me, we spoke awhile back about someone whose was having issues getting her pain meds. You helped me navigate things and in the end we got her what she needed. Thank you again for your time with that. Since then I have been doing my best to advocate for Kratom as well as pain patients and today I’m sad to say that the war on chronic pain sufferers has his a new low. I’m docimenting this horrific journey with video and pictures, so there will be more. However I wanted to share with you as I’m seeing it more and more. 

 

Laying on my couch right now is my dear friend Nikki. She introduced me to Kratom years ago, I owe my life to her as the path she set me on was what prompted me to stop taking 17 medications and go the alternative route. She is a fierce fighter who was dx with breast cancer three years ago. For many that can be a death sentance as you know. Not for Nikki, see she didn’t have time for any of that. She opted for a double mastectomy and chemo, followed by radiation. I watched in awe as this woman drove herself to her appointments, I watched as she got her chemo that she was allergic to, a team standing near in case the steroids and Benadryl weren’t enough. I watched her rock her wigs and never once, not one single time, let the thought she wasn’t going to make it cross her mind. If it did she refused to give it life. She is an inspiration and I remember watching her go through all of that and thinking I’d be lucky if I had even a fraction of her will and strength. At her lowest when she couldn’t make it to the bathroom, when she was void of all dignity, when those around her were at a loss for words. It was her who told us, it would be okay. Slowly but surely she recovered and for a year she did well. 

 

Then she started having stomach issues. 15 ER visits and almost two years later she got a dx of ILC it’s all over her stomach… she is down to a weight we would be concerned of if in a dog. She can no longer eat as her stomach violently seizes. Weekly we make trips to the ER to get fluid drained from her stomach. This time is different than the last, she is still fighting but this time, she needs help with her fight. If there is a chance for her, she needs all the help she can get, and yet instead of fighting for her life. My sweet friend is fighting for her right to Pain meds. 

 

Her refill date came and we made the call to her oncologist who sent it over to the pharmacy. However when we went to pick it up, she was given half of what she was previously being given. Her original scripts were for 10 fentanyl patches and 180 norco she was to wear a patch at all times and take the norco as needed up to 4 times a day. I can attest to the fact even at those doses I have sat by her as she screamed in pain, gasping for air, begging God to let it stop. Even for a moment. So it was quite horrifying when I called her oncologist to see why she had been cut back, and I was told it was not what the doctor wanted to do. She was being forced to cut all her patients down to a 90mg morphine or equiviant a day. I heard the pain in this doctors voice and I felt for her. She said the pressure to do this though not law, might as well be. Her frustration in with this situation was clear as she was quite candid about her feelings about being forced to do this. 

 

I’m not writing you for help this time Sir. I have finally learned enough that I knew the next steps and we have signed her up with hospice and found a pain management doctor willing to go through the steps to get authorization to give her more meds etc etc My reason for writing you is to share her story. One thing that has never changed during this ridiculous crackdown on rx Pain meds has been the statement that cancer patients are exempt from all these cutbacks. The general consensus is that only addicts are being cut back, pill mills shut down, but true chronic pain patients in the end will have their access and as far as cancer, they wouldn’t encounter ANY issues. This is simply not true. I did a poll in a Pain group and within 45 Minutes over 30 cancer patients had clicked the option that said “have medication cut in half” some clicked the option for having their meds STOPPED. 

 

The rage I feel right now is nothing I’ve ever felt before and as I record her, and document this horrifying journey for her in hopes this madness stops, all I can think of is standing in front of the powers that be with a video of her screaming while her body tightens ands her face turns red as she begs for relief. Justify this. No, matter where one stands in this fight, I dare anyone to argue that this is okay. That this is an acceptable side effect of this war. If Nikki were a dog she would get relief in fact a human could face legal ramifications if they allowed a dog to suffer the way she is suffering. I don’t  want to live in a world where this is unacceptable for animals but perfectly fine for humans. 

 

I’ve included a picture of Nikki with her permission. This is the face of someone who was supposed to be exempt from these new guidelines, this is her when the pain isn’t so bad. This is her reality and this is unacceptable. As time passes and we see more and more of this and the powers that be tell us that it’s all to address a greater problem. Please remember my friend. The only hope I can offer her at the moment is we won’t let her suffering be for nothing. 

 

Thank you for reading

DOJ Repeats Threat to Hold Opioid Prescribers Accountable

DOJ Repeats Threat to Hold Opioid Prescribers Accountable

AMA, PharmedOut leaders also pitch solutions at insurers’ policy conference

https://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/opioids/71661

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Justice plans to hold providers accountable per a new large-scale effort to tackle the opioid crisis, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein reiterated here Wednesday.

Addressing the annual policy conference sponsored by America’s Health Insurance Plans, Rosenstein said the new opioids task force announced by Attorney General Jeff Sessions last week will hold everyone accountable; he then specifically cited physicians.

The proliferation of prescription painkillers, including opioids, has countered the ethos of “do no harm,” Rosenstein said, noting that the average American life expectancy has decreased along with the 21st century opioid spread — after nearly doubling over a century. “These drugs have caused a lot of collateral damage,” Rosenstein said, including costing American healthcare more than $1 trillion this century.

In addition to the Task Force, Rosenstein cited as another solution the Justice Department’s involvement with the new Joint Criminal Opioid Darknet Enforcement team; it has been established in large part to counter the flow of painkillers, especially synthetics such as fentanyl, from foreign countries into the U.S.

“We ought to all be about prevention,” he said, citing over-prescription as a major cause of the opioids crisis.

Rosenstein asked insurance companies to utilize their monitoring systems to identify patients receiving too many painkillers and those receiving them for conditions that don’t warrant them. “We recognize that you have a financial incentive” to limit prescriptions, he noted.

Rosenstein also encouraged providers, insurers and others to follow the CDC’s 2016 opioid guidelines.

The deputy attorney general spoke just before a panel on the opioid crisis featuring Patrice Harris, MD, chair of the American Medical Association’s Opioid Task Force; Adriane Fugh-Berman, MD, a Georgetown University professor who leads the PharmedOut initiative; and Nick Szubiak, LCSW, of the National Council for Behavioral Health.

“The pharmaceutical industry is almost completely responsible for this epidemic,” Fugh-Berman said, citing misleading advertising and their practice of hiring “thought leaders” to shame providers into prescribing more opioids. These individuals told physicians they were “torturing our patients” by not issuing painkillers whenever they complained of pain.

Pharmaceutical companies “misused” medical literature by consistently citing small-scale studies and research letters as evidence for supporting opioid prescriptions, she said. They also published ghostwritten articles in medical and consumer publications, and launched disease awareness campaigns. In addition, they funneled money to medical advocacy groups, including the U.S. Pain Foundation ($2.9 million during 2012-2017) and the American Academy of Pain Medicine ($1.2 million) to promulgate messages such as “restricting opioids in any way disadvantages pain patients” and “the needs of patients with [opioid use disorder] must be balanced with the needs of pain patients.”

Such practices have not completely abated, she said. One in 12 physicians accepted money from opioid manufacturers from 2013-2015 totaling $46 million. Fugh-Berman also reminded the crowd that the phrase “abuse deterrent” does not necessarily mean “less addictive.”

She encouraged practitioners to suggest patients try alternative methods for treating pain, such as regular exercise, acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical stimulation. “Some of these treatments are as effective or more effective for pain than opioids,” one of her presentation slides said.

 

Alternative treatments indeed need to be more readily available to patients, said Melinda Becker, who directs a National Governors Association Health Division center.

Harris suggested decreasing administrative burdens for practitioners, such as prior authorization requirements, especially when treating patients with substance use histories.

Physicians are already making progress addressing the opioid crisis, Harris noted. Healthcare professionals more than doubled queries with prescription monitoring programs during 2014-2016, according to an AMA survey; a QuintilesIMS report noted that total opioid prescriptions declined from 259 million to 215.5 million from 2012-2016.

Harris directed the audience to the AMA Task Force’s recommendations and to its dedicated opioid web page.

Szubiak listed several resources needed to combat the crisis, including:

  • Intensive case management
  • Recovery supports
  • Patient navigators
  • Certified community behavioral health clinics
  • Shifting healthcare to value-based care
  • Tracking patients who diverge from care plans

Barriers must also be overcome, Szubiak said, citing providers’ bias against opioid users, and other perceptions within American healthcare that have led to users being regarded as criminals. These patients should instead be educated about prevention and treated.

If we had medical professional in charge of dealing with the mental health issue of addictive personality, and not some of those opiophobic medical professionals that the media keeps seeking out and quoting their PROPaganda.

They keep recommending NSAID’s… which is known to cause 15,000/yr deaths.. and they quote the BIG NUMBER of 215 million opiate prescriptions as being – for some unknown reason – to be excessive.

If all those supposedly “bright/educated” people really looked at those numbers and the estimated number of chronic pain pts. It is easy to see that the reported numbers strongly suggests that chronic pain pts – especially those suffering from intractable chronic pain – are being grossly UNDER TREATED.

It is estimated that there are some 20 – 30 pts suffering from intractable chronic pain.. those requiring 24/7 opiates…  follow standard of care and best practices… with each getting a long acting opiate and a short acting opiate for breakthru…  presuming that they would get a 30 days Rx each time… those pts would require 480 – 720 million opiate prescriptions.

So those 215 million opiate prescriptions would not even begin to address the needs of those intractable chronic pain pts.. .let along… the other 70-80+ million chronic pain pts and those who are in need of opiates for acute pain for a short period.

Is it time to call for our judicial system to walk away from treating the mental health disease as a Crime and turn it over to our medical community ?  After all, our judicial system has been “treating” addiction for over 100 yrs…  and only those who are part of our judicial system and/or draws a paycheck from the war on drugs would consider it a success ?

Four Ways Pharmacists Are Fighting Opioid Abuse

http://drugtopics.modernmedicine.com/comment/reply/446751#comment-form

Greater awareness of the dangers posed by prescription opioids is changing pharmacy practice.

Efforts to address the opioid epidemic are as complex as the problem, with involvement ranging from government agencies to state pharmacy boards to addiction specialists to medical professionals.

Pharmacists may be the first to suspect opioid abuse and misuse, and many have altered the way they interact with patients who take opioids. Studies have found that pharmacists say the epidemic has changed the way they counsel patients about pain management and potential problems.

Refusing to fill a prescription“A growing awareness of the dangers posed by prescription opioids seems to be leading to more proactive discussions between pharmacists and patients regarding this issue,” says Lucas Hill, PharmD, BCPS, BCACP, clinical assistant professor at the University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy.

Here are some of the biggest ways pharmacy practice is changing.

1. Adopting New Protocols

Some chain and independent pharmacies are implementing policy changes to protect patients and pharmacists. CVS, for example, has strengthened counseling for patients filling a first-time opioid prescription.

“During this counseling, our pharmacists will talk to the patient about the recommendations from the CDC around opioid use,” says Tom Davis, RPh, vice president for pharmacy professional services at CVS Pharmacy. “The key message to patients initiating opioid treatment for an acute use is to use the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible duration of time. Pharmacists will also talk to patients about the importance of safely storing and appropriately disposing of opioids to prevent misuse or diversion.”

CVS uses the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain to frame its prescribing policy, limiting the supply of opioids dispensed for certain acute prescriptions to seven days for patients new to the therapy.

Related article: The Other Side of Opioid Limits

“The program also employs MME [morphine milligram equivalent] limits consistent with the CDC Guidelines,” Davis tells Drug Topics. “And, it requires the use of immediate-release formulations of opioids before extended-release opioids are dispensed.” These changes went into effect in September 2017.

Tana Kaefer, PharmD, clinical coordinator at Bremo Pharmacies in Richmond, VA, says her protocol is to emphasize opioid alternatives. “If the patient gets two prescriptions, one for ibuprofen and one for an opioid, I may tell them to try the ibuprofen first.”

Kaefer also lets her patients know their options so they don’t have extra medication in the house, such as by only filling part of a prescription. Laws in Virginia allow pharmacists to split the prescription, for example, dispensing five pills when 10 are prescribed and having the patient come back if more are needed.

Insurance barriersShe also tells patients how to correctly dispose of leftovers. “We know this is a huge problem if medication is left in the medicine cabinet and other people come into the house looking for it,” she says.

2. Embracing a Team-Based Approach

Teamwork is helping reduce opioid abuse in hospital and long-term care settings, says Deb Pasko, PharmD, MHA, director of medication safety and quality with ASHP. Doctors, nurses, and pharmacists work together to determine and monitor the optimal medication for patients, and respond quickly when changes are needed. “We may have a trauma patient come into the ER who has acute needs, then go to the operating room and need a high dosage, then on to intensive care,” says Pasko.

She says pharmacists should help decide what medication is indicated, the best interval, and identify any potential interactions. They can also help determine if patients should continue receiving opioids, if medication should be tapered, or if an alternative should be considered. 

3. Using PDMPs

More than two dozen states now require pharmacists to check prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs). These electronic databases that track controlled substance prescriptions are among the most promising state-level interventions to improve opioid prescribing, inform clinical practice, and protect patients at risk, according to the CDC.A brief history of opioidsClick to expand

“For me the prescription monitoring program is very helpful,” says Kaefer. “If I have concerns it allows me to see the bigger picture of a patient. I can see if a patient is visiting other pharmacies. I find it very helpful that I can connect to other states.”

There have been “remarkable successes” in controlling the prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances, particularly opioids, when PDMPs are accessed, says Carmen Catizone, RPh, MS, DPh, executive director of the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy.

As more states embrace PDMPs, their potential to help curb the epidemic is growing. Promising developments in PDMPs, according to the CDC, include:

  • More seamlessly integrating them into electronic health records
  • Permitting physicians to delegate PDMP access to other allied health professionals in their office (physician assistants and nurse practitioners)
  • Streamlining the process for providers to register with the PDMP.

While monitoring is helping decrease the abuse of prescription opioids, some industry experts fear it may be contributing to more dangerous practices among abusers. In the last few years, overdoses from illicit opioids, such as heroin and fentanyl, have skyrocketed.

“The most serious concern about [PDMP] implementation is that it could push people who are misusing prescription opioids to an illicit drug market that is flooded with ultra-potent fentanyls.” says Hill. “In my opinion, that isn’t an argument against [PDMPs] so much as an argument for expanded access to evidence-based treatment with methadone and buprenorphine.”

4. Preparing for Worst-Case Scenarios

Expanding pharmacists’ authority to administer and dispense opioid-reversing medications such as naloxone may help pharmacists prevent patient overdoses from legal and illegal drugs.

Some states permit pharmacists to dispense naloxone through a collaborative practice agreement. In states where pharmacists can prescribe naloxone, they must complete training provided by their employer or a local school of pharmacy.

“This initiative requires significant outreach to pharmacists, patients and caregivers, first responders, and legislators,” says Catizone. “Besides educating people on when and how to properly administer such medications, there is the need to educate stakeholders and naysayers about addiction as a disease and not a stigma or indictment of an individual.” 

More legislation empowering pharmacists, caregivers, and first responders to ensure the widespread availability of naloxone and other similar products across all states would help save many lives, Catizone says.

“Until the number of patients who are at risk or dying from the use and abuse of opioids is zero or as close to zero as humanly possible,” Catizone says, “there is much more than can be done by pharmacists, pharmacy boards, and other stakeholders.

Isn’t it amazing, Pharmacists are suppose to be scientists … suppose to be “drug experts”… here we have a article about them individually and collectively ignoring some of the basics of opiates used to treat pain.

It starts out with the apparent unquestionable belief that all of those opiate conversion tablets are an “exact science”.. apparently most/many/all have not read the “fine print” on these website.. here is just one “warning” from one such conversion websites http://www.globalrph.com/narcotic.cgi Published equianalgesic ratios are considered crude estimates at best and therefore it is imperative that careful consideration is given to individualizing the dose of the selected opioid. Dosage titration of the new opioid should be completed slowly and with frequent monitoring. 

Then there is this … pharmacists should help decide what medication is indicated, the best interval, and identify any potential interactions I wonder if when a pharmacist is to this evaluation – of subjective pain – and probably has no idea of the pt’s CYP-450 opiate metabolism rate status and those with a fast/ultra fast metabolism.. may or may not get an appropriate dose… since it doesn’t conform to the “cookie cutter” dosing guidelines that has been established as a standard of care and/or best practices within the hospital.

Then there is the apparent belief that the data within the PMP is infallible and no pts/diverters/abusers would present a fake/forged/stolen ID when they have a prescription filled.

If only those who are professing in trying to help pain pts and don’t know all the rules.. especially when they are dealing with treating a subjective disease.