New EAN Guideline on Palliative Care in MS

New EAN Guideline on Palliative Care in MS

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/898556

LISBON, Portugal — The European Academy of Neurology has developed a new guideline on the palliative care of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Increasingly, palliative care is becoming a topic of interest and concern to neurologists all over the world. Delegates to the Congress of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) 2018 here discussed palliative care as it relates to neurology in general — but also in the setting of multiple sclerosis (MS) in particular — as a guideline targeted to patients with severe MS was discussed.

The guideline was presented by Alessandra Solari, MD, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy, but is not yet published.  

The new MS guideline emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary and multiprofessional approach to care, Wolfgang Grisold, MD, Medical University of Vienna, Austria, who is secretary general of the World Federation of Neurology and a coauthor of the document, told Medscape Medical News. For example, a palliative care team could include a neurologist, a nurse, a physiotherapist, and a social worker.

Grisold became passionate about palliative care when he managed patients with terminal brain cancer and others with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), he said. These conditions have a similar short time course, typically a year or 18 months from diagnosis until death.

But neurologic conditions requiring palliative care are not restricted to tumors and ALS. Such care could also be pertinent for patients with severe dementia, stroke, Parkinson’s disease, brain trauma, and MS.

Patients with severe MS may be suffering intolerable pain and spasms and be unable to move freely, Franz Fazekas, MD, Medical University Graz, Austria, and new EAN president, told Medscape Medical News.

“This is different from, for example, neuro-oncology, where after probably a limited time, patients will pass away, and the same is true for some neuromuscular diseases. But with MS, there can be a prolonged period of suffering.”

Pain Management

Pain management is part of palliative care, David Oliver, MBBS, FRCP, a palliative care expert and honorary professor at the University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom, told attendees during a workshop on palliative care in neurology held during the EAN meeting.

“We thought Parkinson disease and ALS patients didn’t have pain, but studies show they do.”

In addition to pain and mobility issues, these patients may suffer social isolation, emotional distress, and cognitive decline, said Oliver. They may also fear death or dying, or what some refer to as “the elephant in the room,” he said.

Doctors are encouraged to have open discussions with their patients about death and dying. This, said Oliver, includes broaching the topic of when and whether to withdraw treatment.

The palliative care team should maintain open lines of communication with the patient and family. Discussions should include advanced care planning, especially in cases where cognitive deterioration is expected, said Oliver.

He noted an Australian survey showing that 36% of patients diagnosed with ALS said they were dissatisfied with the manner in which the diagnosis was relayed to them.

The new MS guideline recommends “a shift” in focus from end-of-life care to palliative care “where you know from the beginning there is a restricted time and you have to make life as comfortable as possible,” said Grisold. “Palliative care is like a coat you put around the patient.”

Palliative care should be initiated early in the trajectory of care, stressed Oliver. He pointed out that at least for patients with cancer and heart failure, evidence shows that early initiation of palliative care helps ease their fears.

He stressed that patients often don’t want to bother physicians about their complaints, so it’s up to the doctor to ask about physical and psychosocial issues.

Caregiver Burden

The MS guideline also emphasizes the importance of caregivers, “who are often neglected,” said Grisold.

Families of a patient facing the end of life are under enormous stress. There are demands on their time and financial resources, with some caregivers having to leave work to help tend to their loved one.

The guideline authors favored the idea of structured “debriefing” for caregivers by the palliative care team to “take away some of this burden,” said Grisold.

There are also emotional and spiritual issues related to the end of life to consider.  

A delegate attending the workshop pointed out that societies are increasingly multicultural and represent different religions, while the legal and ethical systems still seem to be based on Christianity. In this complex environment, doctors dealing with palliative care will need additional guidance, she said.

Developing guidelines for palliative care in neurology is “a complex process” that takes time and resources, Raymond Voltz, MD, director, Center of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Germany, told workshop attendees, and at the end of that process, the guidelines are not always followed.

Hundreds of patients and caregivers from seven European countries played an instrumental role in the development of the MS guideline, Sascha Köpke, PhD, RN, Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Germany, said in an EAN press release.

This involvement illustrates the emphasis on shared decision-making that underscores patient autonomy and promotes the individualization of diagnosis and therapy, the researchers noted.

The EAN has long supported this patient-centred approach. While including consumers in the guideline development was resource- and time-consuming, it was also “highly rewarding,” said Köpke.

“Patients and caregivers really helped us to formulate the guideline in a way that was in line with actual practice and their own needs. We were able to see clearly which of our ideas met with approval or rejection.”

The process and findings of this collaboration with patients and caregivers, gleaned through an online survey and focus group meetings (with Köpke as first author), were presented as a poster here at the meeting.

“The involvement of patients and caregivers increases the reliability and relevance of the guideline for clinical practice,” said Köpke.

The EAN aims to eventually have similar guidelines for other neurologic conditions, said Fazekas.

The EAN is not the only group embracing the concept of palliative care. The World Federation of Neurology, too, is incorporating palliative care sessions into its meetings, said Grisold.

“A few years ago, it would have been impossible that people would want to have that.”

The guideline was funded by the EAN and the Foundation of the Italian MS Society. No relevant financial relationships were disclosed.

Congress of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) 2018. Symposium 4: Palliative care and Neurology. Presented June 16, 2018. 

Kolodny: remarks inspired many students to think differently about the role of medicine in overcoming public health challenges.

Future leaders in health and medicine flock to Brandeis

http://www.brandeis.edu/now/2018/july/global-youth-summit.html

Hundreds of rising high school juniors and seniors ventured to Brandeis from June 23-30 for the annual Global Youth Summit on the Future of Medicine, which brings students who have a passion for medicine and science together with one another, as well as doctors, professors, researchers and government officials in the medical field.

During the program, students attend lectures, work in labs and participate in workshops that offer insights into the future of the healthcare industry, and hone leadership, networking, public speaking and collaboration skills.

“I like how we get so much professional experience in a short amount of time, how you can learn a lot and have fun,” said Libby Jin of Newton, Massachusetts. “Hopefully, through this program, I can learn more and get more involved in the medical field in my community and build up my experience for college and medical school. Having talks with these great professionals has been an awesome experience.”

Dr. Andrew Kolodny, a senior scientist and the director of the Opioid Policy Research Collaborative at Brandeis, served as the keynote speaker for the Global Youth Summit; Kolodny’s remarks inspired many students to think differently about the role of medicine in overcoming public health challenges.

“I’ve always had an interest in medicine but knew coming in that I needed to broaden my horizons in this field,” said Spencer McCorkle of northeast Arkansas. “I hope to incorporate more treatments without a pill…I want to get to the source and fixing a problem without having to use anything like that.”

Students also had the opportunity to enter the lab and look under the microscope. Under the guidance of biology professor Melissa Kosinski-Collins, Global Youth Summit participants studied Huntington’s disease by experimenting on fruit flies.

In Kosinski-Collins’ biology lab in the Shapiro Science Center, students started by putting the flies to sleep using carbon dioxide. They eventually dissected the unconscious flies and examined them under a microscope.

“I would like to pursue data science, but I’ve always found medicine to be interesting and unique in general,” said Chicago native Nathaniel Smith. “When we dissected the fruit flies, we did so to learn about different neurological diseases.”

“The experience was immersive,” Smith added. “Knowing more about medicine can help me look at problems in data science in more well-rounded way.”

The Global Youth Summit on the Future of Medicine is administered through the Office of Precollege Programs at Brandeis.

Man sues the state for forcing him to use CVS pharmacies – I sense CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT

HIV patient sues state over rule to use only CVS for needed drugs

A man with HIV is using an anti-Obamacare provision in the Ohio Constitution to sue the state for forcing him to use CVS pharmacies if he is to receive benefits under a government drug-assistance program.

Edward J. Hamilton of Columbus filed suit this week in the Court of Claims against the Ohio Department of Health in connection with the department’s HIV Drug Assistance Program, which requires participants to get their medicine through pharmacy giant CVS.

And a letter by the Ohio Department of Health that was attached to Hamilton’s lawsuit tells patients in the drug assistance program, “CVS Caremark will provide ALL of the medications covered on the formulary.”

Hamilton didn’t agree with the politics that led to a 2011 constitutional amendment that said no law “shall compel, directly of indirectly, any person, employer, or health care provider to participate in a health-care system.” However, he said, it’s applicable to a program that drives some Ohio HIV patients away from the pharmacy of their choice and to CVS’ — including its mail-order business, which he said has forced him to face delays getting life-saving drugs, sent him empty bottles and created other problems.

Explaining why he decided to use the constitutional provision to take on the drug program’s restrictions, Hamilton, a longtime HIV activist, said, “You might as well use their own poison on them. It’s like holding a mirror up to a witch.”

The suit is related to another that was filed last week against the state health department in the Ohio Court of Claims and one that was filed against CVS in federal court in March. They are seeking damages from those entities over a mailing by CVS to 6,000 drug program participants that printed “HIV” above addressees’ names, making the confidential health information available to anybody who saw the letters.

Because of his dissatisfaction with CVS, Hamilton does not participate in the drug assistance program. His suit accuses the Ohio Department of Health of making the “public policy choice to steer and mandate over 6,000 persons in the Ohio Drug Assistance Program to use CVS Health and all related entities (including Caremark LLC, CVS Pharmacy and its CVS Specialty and its mail order pharmacies) in violation of Article 1, Sec. 21 of the Constitution of the state of Ohio.”

Hamilton is asking the court to suspend CVS’s contract with the department of health until the requirement that all medicines in the drug assistance program come from CVS is removed. He’s also seeking unspecified damages and attorney’s fees.

“We have not been named in this lawsuit and have not had the chance to review the allegations or underlying facts,” company spokeswoman Christina Beckerman said in an email. “However, CVS Caremark’s highest priority is assuring patient access to clinically appropriate drugs while managing overall health care costs for our clients, and we offer our clients multiple clinical tools and pharmacy network options targeted at achieving both of these goals.”

Since March, the Dispatch has been examining pharmacy benefit managers such as CVS Caremark. The company, the country’s seventh-largest, has a close relationship with state agencies. For example, four of the state’s five Medicaid managed-care organizations contract with CVS to mange about $3 billion a year in prescription benefits.

Health department spokesman Russ Kennedy said the agency wouldn’t comment on issues related to a lawsuit — including a question about why it agreed to a state contract spending state and federal funding for HIV drugs that locked out all pharmacies but CVS.

Hamilton said for program participants the choice is to use CVS or lose assistance.

“We’re deprived of assistance even though the state applied to the federal government in our name,” he said.

mschladen@dispatch.com

Without opioids, ‘pain so great, you question whether you should go on’ – chronic disease sufferer

I know that Barb says my hearing is going but listen to this reporter in the first minute… I heard ” more than 11 million Americans abused prescription opioids in 2015 .. that is roughly  91 million people”  what are these people reproducing like RABBITS ?

The chronic painer on the video … gets TWO THUMBS UP on his interview

how many thousands of legit chronic pain pts thrown to the curb with this raid ?

I am an avid reader of your post and articles. I am a 59 year old man with progressive stage III Adhesive Arachnoiditis living in Indian Mound, TN where I recently moved from Mt Pleasant, SC to live with my 32 year old son is stationed at Ft Campbell, Kentucky. I also recently completed robotic surgery to remove cancer cells from my kidney and surrounding organ tissue. I moved here in this past January where I was fortunate to meet Dr. Kroll with CPS (Comprehensive Pain Specialist) located in Clarksville, TN. 

I was Blessed to have located a very compassionate Doctor and staff for my pain management needs from 34 years of dealing with pain. 

I was notified today that ALL CPS Pain management offices in Tennessee are closing as of July 31, 2018. My understanding is that these offices are owned by one of the Tennesse Senators or lawmakers here in TN. I am new to the are this past 6 months so I am not up to speed with verification of this fact. However it is noteworthy and something I feel needs attention. 

No referral information for other Pain Management Doctors or Clinics were provided. 

My experience with both my doctors, (Dr Peter Kroll and Dr. Rebekah Pierce) as well as the Staff here at the Clarksville, TN office has been first class. So I was a bit shocked to receive this news with no recommendations or referrals to help in relocating to another PM operation. They are working with me to transfer my records to my PCP and they are still performing a Nerve Ablation procedure on July 25. 

 

I am 59 years old with very serious conditions:

Post operative Cancer 5-21-18

Stage III Adhesive Arachnoiditis

Chronic Pancreatitis 

And a number of other very pain related conditions. 

Now I am faced with locating a new PMP by July 31, ALONG WITH All the patients from what I believe is over 6 offices in TN.

From what I have read to date, no lawmaker was involved in the Medicare fraud scheme revealed this past April,  that possibly led to the closing of ALL CPS pain management operations.

 

My Concern:

There are literally thousands of Chronic Pain patients now displaced from their doctors, with no help or direction being provided to ensure there is no disruption of life saving medications that provide a modest quality of life. I am Blessed to have a son in the Army to help me get around to locate a new PMP. However, I am among thousands of patients now looking for a new PMP here in Tennessee where PMP are already overloaded with patients. It seems clear that with the closing of all of these offices across the state, the Tennessee Pain Management network of physicians here in TN quite possibly will not be able to take in these thousands of displaced patients. 

The lack of knowledge resources and referral resources is astonishing. Thousands of Chronic Pain Patients are now faced with very real fear and anxiety of trying to locate a new PMP in an already overburdened and limited PMP resource here in TN. Recent laws and new guidelines now directed at Chronic Pain patient care in Tennessee have already pushed an already unstable Chronic Pain care network even further into an abyss that is going to very quickly manifest into intolerable stress levels in the newly displaced population of Chronic Pain patients that may very well lead to countless deaths among the TN Chronic Pain community. Some from suicide from patients that finally give up on the TN healthcare system, and then patients that do not have a family support system to help navigate themselves to what Chronic Pain Physicians still exist in TN. It is a given that the vast majority of now displaced patients will be forced to go through an indefinite time period with NO pain medication. ALL Chronic Pain patients are already living with the minimum dosage of pain medication possible because of the abuses of state governments that have avoided, either unintentionally or intentionally, the serious needs of Tennessee Chronic Pain Patients. 

People keep getting displaced and thrown out of what may have been years or decades of pain management care by physicians that now have little empathy for displaced Chronic Pain Patients that are from all walks of life. This is heartbreaking. Where is the outrage from Mothers, Fathers, Sisters and Brothers being separated from critical medication and doctors that help provide dignity and a reasonable quality of life for the elderly, disabled and helpless. 

You see outrage about Children being temporarily separated from their parents all over TV. 

But virtually no real coverage OR outrage at Parents, Sons, Daughters and disabled being placed in jeopardy of real life and death situations because of the lack of adequate pain management. How many here in Tennessee will now die, either from suicide or reactions from being cut off from powerful medications that can clearly result in death among the weak and disabled. 

Thank you Steve for reading this and hopefully passing on any advice for the thousands of displaced Chronic Pain patients now in Tennessee.

It is a real shame, because the doctors that treated and managed my Chronic Pain management needs, Dr. Peter Kroll and Dr. Rebekah Pierce were among the best physicians I have ever been Blessed to have in my Life. I feel their lives have probably been turned upside down almost as much as the patients they treated with Compassion and Care. I believe it is CPS itself that has made the decisions now affecting both the doctors and patients soon to be FORMER Doctors and Patients.

IF IN FACT, a senior Lawmaker here in TN is the owner of all CPS locations in the state of TN. Then that Lawmaker should face serious scrutiny into how the closing of these facilities are being handled. VERY serious scrutiny. 

I located this information from the BBB:

GOVERNMENT ACTION

The following describes a pending government action that has been formally brought by a government agency but has not yet been resolved. We are providing a summary of the government’s allegations, which have not yet been proven.

According to information on file with BBB, on April 4, 2018, the United States Department of Justice and the Assistant United States Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee issued an indictment on John Davis, former CEO of Comprehensive Pain Specialist. Mr. Davis is charged with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States and pay and receive health care kickbacks in conjunction with a Federal Health Care Program, and seven counts of paying and receiving health care kickbacks. This matter is still pending. For more details click here: https://www.justice.gov/usao-mdtn/pr/two-tennessee-health-care-executives-charged-role-46-million-medicare-kickback-scheme

 

@CVS Health/Caremark/Silver Scripts screwing pts on Medicare Part D ?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/cvs-exploits-pbm-role-and-taxpayers-pay-1529956036

http://www.arkansasmatters.com/news/local-news/lawmakers-pharmacists-meet-with-cvs-over-regulation-of-pharmacy-benefit-managers/985681024

https://insurancenewsnet.com/oarticle/pharmacy-middlemen-reap-millions-from-medicaid

My wife and I  have Silver Scripts Part D health insurance… which the PBM is Caremark… which is part of CVS Health.. My wife has a lot of chronic health issues and one of the medications that she has been taking for over 10 yrs I was trying to get refilled and Silver Scripts wanted – once again – a prior authorization for something that they have been paying for … for over 10 yrs..  They told me that the copay – if they approved it – would be $600 and change… for a 90 days supply which is constantly increasing…

I asked the pharmacy that I patronized what they cash price was and was quoted the figure $300 and change…  I went out to www.goodrx.com and found a local pharmacy that would charge $87 and change for the same prescription.

If I had the pharmacy that I normally go to fill the prescription and billed Silver Script… I would have been charged $600 and change and they would have reimbursed the pharmacy for far less and claw back the difference  http://www.pharmout.com/pharmacy-insights/pharmacy-clawback-issue

This prescription is a controlled substance C-IV medication… so now she is throwing a “RED FLAG” according to the DEA for paying cash for a controlled substance when she has insurance.   Is Caremark putting Medicare Part D pts in a compromising position… pay their INFLATED COPAYS or run the risk of becoming a target of the DEA for throwing RED FLAGS ?

Silver Scripts is the 2nd or 3rd largest part D provider … for seniors and disabled on Medicare.

This year, apparently Silver Scripts decided to have “preferred pharmacies” which only they were able to charge the copays that Silver Script charged everyone last year…  just so happens there is only 10 preferred pharmacies in Clark-Floyd-Harrison counties – 8 of them being CVS stores and one independent in Jeffersonville & Corydon.  This year, our out of pocket expenses have jumped some 30%+ because the closest preferred pharmacy is over 9 miles away and the independent pharmacy that we use will deliver to us…. If we are not able to get out.

I don’t know if some/many at HHS, CMS or members of Congress are asleep at the switch or just turning a blind eye to what is going on.

I have taken my own advice that I regularly handout and  have filed a grievance/complaint with CMS (800-MEDICARE) and I have just begun.. When these entities have screwed with others… I can only make a recommendation as to what they can/should do… but now  I HAVE SKIN IN THE GAME…

 

 

 

steve

How Florida’s new opioid-prescription law affects you

How Florida’s new opioid-prescription law affects you

http://www.theledger.com/news/20180702/how-floridas-new-opioid-prescription-law-affects-you

As Florida’s new law on opioid prescriptions went into effect Sunday, patients seeking relief from pain may find there have been changes in what they are prescribed, dosages and physicians who will treat them.

LAKELAND — As Florida’s new law on opioid prescriptions goes into effect Sunday, patients seeking relief from pain may find there have been changes in what they are prescribed, the dosages they are given and perhaps even in the physician who will treat them.

The most publicized part of the law is the limiting of opioid prescriptions to three days, seven days if a physician documents that it is medically necessary, for people with intense pain from surgery, a traumatic injury or an acute illness. Patients with such acute pain will have to be reassessed by a physician to get a refill at the end of a three-day or seven-day prescription.

Patients with chronic, long-term, debilitating pain, including those with cancer pain and those needing palliative and end-of-life care, are not limited to the three-day or seven-day prescriptions.

Recognizing that drug overdose is the leading cause of accidental death in the United States, the Florida Legislature enacted the complicated law in an effort to reduce addiction from opioid medications. The intent is to encourage physicians to prescribe the lowest dosages that will take the edge off intense pain or to use alternative medications and therapies.

Emergency department physicians and surgeons have already been working to reduce the use of opioids, said Dr. Timothy Regan, an emergency medicine physician who is chief medical officer for Lakeland Regional Health.

There is general recognition that a past trend encouraging physicians to try to eliminate pain has led to over-prescribing, which fueled the opioid epidemic, Regan said.

The federal government has changed verbiage hospitals must use when patients are asked about their hospital stay, Regan said. The question used to be how well have they controlled your pain; now the question is have they talked with you about your pain.

“This allows prescribers to address pain control in a more conservative way” rather than encouraging over-prescribing, Regan said.

Chronic-pain patients who have been using opioids, such as for back pain or knee pain, should still be able to get their medications, but they might see some differences under the new law.

“We have been educating our patients in advance,” said Dr. John Ellington, who is in charge of risk management at the 200-physician Watson Clinic in Lakeland. Posters explaining the law have been up at the clinic’s various facilities and the clinic’s website posted an article explaining the law, he said.

The law requires physicians to go through several steps when prescribing opioids for chronic pain, and some physicians may not want to go through all those steps and take the risk of making a mistake that could end up with a censure or, for flagrant violations, a criminal charge, Ellington said.

“Will some doctors not prescribe opioids at all? Certainly,” Ellington said. Although, he added, most physicians likely will make adjustments to their practices and continue to prescribe.

In order to prescribe opioids, physicians, osteopaths, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists, nurse practitioners, physicians and others who are allowed to prescribe controlled substances must:

‒ Register with the federal Drug Enforcement Agency.

‒ Complete a two- or three-hour course on prescribing.

‒ Register under their medical license that they treat chronic pain.

‒ Document the patient’s pain and make a written plan for treating the pain.

‒ Check the state database to see whether there are other narcotic/opioid prescriptions for the patient.

‒ Check the patient’s photo ID against the medical records.

‒ And enter the prescription into the state database by the end of the next business day.

“A lot of people may feel uncomfortable doing that,” Ellington said. Some might decide to no longer prescribe opioids, even to long-term patients with chronic pain. They might refer them to a pain management clinic for treatment.

Regan said that pain management specialists likely will see a spike in business because of the referrals. However, pain management specialists are trained in not just narcotic medications but also in alternative medications and alternative therapies, which might end up being in the best interest of the patient, Regan said.

Dr. Francisco Chebly, medical director of the large Lakeland Regional Health Physician Group, said that if a doctor has been comfortable writing prescriptions, the new law should not be a major obstacle.

“It is a little bit of an extra step” to check the database, “but should not cause a deterrent.” Chebly said. “It is only a matter of a few seconds to log in” to the database.

“A doctor should be aware if a patient has been doctor shopping” in an attempt to obtain extra narcotics, Chebly said.

Regan said that Lakeland Regional is working to incorporate access to the database with its electronic records system, making it easier for doctors to check whether a patient has other opioid prescriptions.

Patients should be aware their doctor will ask them more questions, but it’s not because their doctor doesn’t trust them, Regan said. “Physicians are being held accountable to prescribe in a responsible way, and patients should be aware of that.”

The law also addresses what pharmacies must do to check the legitimacy of prescriptions and ensure a patient is not being sold multiple narcotics from a variety of prescribers.

“There is nothing about this law that means legitimate patients cannot get legitimate medicine for legitimate reasons,” Ellington said.

Correction: Dr. Francisco Chelby’s name was originally misspelled in this story. This online version has been corrected.

Marilyn Meyer can be reached at marilyn.meyer@theledger.com or 863-802-7558. Follow her on Twitter @marilyn_ledger.

 

How to meet the new TN opiate dosing guidelines for IDIOTS

No automatic alt text available.

Another Pharm-deity hell bent on saving addicts – how many will end up committing suicide ?

‘Black Hawk Down’ veteran now deployed in fight against opioids

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/02/black-hawk-down-veteran-now-deployed-in-fight-against-opioids.html

An Army veteran who fought in the Battle of Mogadishu and later was portrayed in the film “Black Hawk Down” is now deploying on a new mission: the war against opioids.

Former Delta Force operator and Master Sgt. Norman Hooten has obtained his doctorate’s degree in pharmacy and says he is making the jump to the medical field to help fellow veterans who are suffering.

“I lost a couple of close friends that died of drug related overdoses and they were really good guys – special operations guys,” Hooten said in an interview with the Department of Veterans Affairs last week. “Losing my fellow soldiers to substance abuse was almost as bad as losing them in combat. All their talent and potential was lost and I wanted to do something about it.”

Hooten on Friday completed his residency at a VA hospital in West Palm Beach, Florida, and is now part of the staff at one of the VA’s facilities in Orlando.

Hooten first wanted to pursue a career in medicine in August 2001 when he retired — but he was soon recalled to active duty after the 9/11 terror attacks. He was deployed to Afghanistan, before spending eight years with the Federal Air Marshal Service and then working as a contractor in Jordan. In 2012 he headed back to medical school to complete his studies, the VA says.

“It’s never too late to make a difference and go back to learn and grow,” Hooten said. “You should give back until your last dying breath. I started [pharmacy] school at 52 and at 57 I’m finishing up my residency.”

Hooten said during an Army event in 2013 that one lesson he took from the Battle of Mogadishu was to be creative and adapt to any situation.

“Train like you fight,” he said. “Don’t train like you think you’re going to fight. Don’t train like you want to fight. Do a real good analysis of the enemy, because he’s 50 percent of that equation, and then train like you will fight. Get used to being creative and adapting to the enemy’s actions.”

Now he is telling the VA that he “can’t stand idle while veterans suffer with addiction.”

“If I can help just one veteran, or have just one call me later to tell me that I was able to help them get off opioids, then that would be tremendous,” Hooten said.

Is there something in the water in TENNESSEE ?

“You do what you can to survive.” Linda and Larry Drain got married in 1981, but when Linda’s eligibility under Medicaid was threatened, they were forced to either separate or lose her benefits. Now they live 40 minutes away from each other in low-income housing.