Is it time for the chronic painers to refocus their efforts ?

My “little blog” just started its 7th year… I have watched people come ready to change the world and people who are no longer around for various reasons.. some gave up fighting, some have passed away and others – unfortunately – couldn’t stand their unrelenting pain any longer and used the “ultimate option” to resolve their pain.

I have seen the number of Face Book pages that have exploded from a few dozens to hundreds or maybe even THOUSANDS.. and often you see the pictures/names of the many of the same people on many of these pages devoted to chronic pages

I have heard of pts that have sent letters to their representatives in Congress and their State representatives… as well as many in the media industry… some had some gathering of protestors in various locations.

Some states have recently implemented legislation that limits the number of opiate doses acute pts can get… but there has been rumors about many prescribers adopting them for all pts taking opiates… just like they did with the 2016 release of the CDC opiate dosing guidelines.

Often pts are told that their pain doses are being reduced or stopped over fear of losing their license… perhaps it is time for those pts who are having their pain medications reduced or eliminated going after the prescriber’s license.

Here is a list of the physical consequences of untreated pain https://www.pharmaciststeve.com/?p=20995 

Perhaps it is time for pts to start filing complaints with the state medical licensing board…  file complaints with www.cms.gov if you are on Medicare/Medicaid or your insurance company. If your insurance is thru your employer and it is a ERISA policy – your company is providing self-insursed health insurance… there is someone within the company has authority over the policy since the  “insurance company” is only a paper shuffler and paying out the employer’s money.

If your blood pressure started to increase as your pain meds were decreased and nothing was done… file a complaint

If you are no longer able to take care of personal care items – as you were able to do before your meds were reduced – file a complaint

Here is a list of all the states’ medical licensing boards… most/all should have a complaint form on their website  http://physicianjobs.us/Medical%20Boards.htm

Here is website you are able to file your opinions of a practitioner’s care for pts   https://www.healthgrades.com/

If your prescriber explains that they are concerned about their license and their livelihood and that is the reason they are refusing to properly treat your health issues…  If they have reduced your pain medication to a point that you are no longer able to function as you once were before or have totally cut you off..  if you complain… what are they going to do… discharge you from the practice .. then you have a reason to file complaints about retaliation against them.

If you live in one of the 38 states that allow a single party recording… use your smart phone to record your interaction with your prescriber and/or staff.

Feds Double Down On Pills As Fentanyl Deaths Double

Feds Double Down On Pills As Fentanyl Deaths Double

http://www.pressreleasepoint.com/feds-double-down-pills-fentanyl-deaths-double

By Josh Bloom — July 14, 2018

Here’s a splendid idea. Let’s say that North Korea finally comes up with a missile that can travel more than 20 feet before blowing up and they decide to launch one at California. Naturally, we would retaliate by attacking… Sweden.

Ridiculous, right? Maybe so, but conceptually it is not a whole lot different from our war on the “opioid epidemic,” which, to be accurate, should be called by its correct name – the “fentanyl epidemic.” The strategy that our government is employing is is much like attacking Sweden. We are fighting the wrong enemy. Pain medications, like Percocet and Vicodin, on their own, kill few relatively few people while illicit fentanyl and its monster analogs like carfentanil are responsible for the carnage we see daily on the news.

The proof of the failure of our inept strategy comes to us from the occasionally-reliable CDC in its July 11th report “Rising Numbers of Deaths Involving Fentanyl and Fentanyl Analogs, Including Carfentanil, and Increased Usage and Mixing with Non-opioids.”

The new report corrects previous data, which understated the number of fentanyl and fentanyl analog deaths. This is not the first time the CDC corrected itself. The last one – only a few months ago – was a real doozie. (1) 

The current update includes information on: (1) the continued increase in the supply of fentanyl and fentanyl analogs detected by law enforcement; (2) the sharp rise in overdose deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs in a growing number of states, in particular the growing number of deaths involving the ultra-high potency fentanyl analog known as carfentanil…The current update includes information on: (1) the continued increase in the supply of fentanyl and fentanyl analogs detected by law enforcement; (2) the sharp rise in overdose deaths involving fentanyl and fentanyl analogs in a growing number of states, in particular the growing number of deaths involving the ultra-high potency fentanyl analog known as carfentanil…

Here are some of the depressing (but not at all surprising) data from the CDC via the agency’s Health Alert Network:

  • Deaths involving illicit fentanyl and its analogs more than doubled from 2015 to 2016, rising from 14,440 to 34,119
  • This trend worsened in 2017.  There were an estimated 25,460 such deaths during the first six months of the year alone

OK, let’s stop and make a graph of the number of deaths from these data.

Source: Deaths from all drugs by year: National Vital Statistics System, Deaths from fentanyl and its analogs: National Institute On Drug Abuse (2). 2017 data are currently available only for the first six months of the year. I doubled it for the purposes of the graph, giving an estimate of 50,000 fentanyl deaths. In reality, given the explosive increase, the real number will almost certainly be higher. 

Now let’s take some liberties with the data. If the CDC can do this I figure I’m entitled to a certain amount of extrapolation, even though it is certifiably crazy. The liberty I took was extending the projected deaths out to 2019 based on the slopes of the lines in the past few years. Of course, assuming that these slopes will remain the same is bogus. But it’s not a whole lot worse than the tricky stats that the CDC and PROP toss around and it illustrates a point.

 

Can you imagine the headlines in 2019???

“Fentanyl Responsible For 100,000 Of The 95,000 Drug Overdose Deaths In The US”

Which could only be explained by another headline…

“Fentanyl Kills Some People More Than Once”

OK, you get the point. As I’ve said a million times, it is street fentanyl (illegally made fentanyl and its analogs) that is the real enemy. So how are our leaders reacting? Not so well.

  1. Andrew Kolodny could not have kept a straight face when he said this, right?

“[A 5% drop in addiction diagnosis] means that there’s light at the end of the tunnel”

Buzzfeed News, July 12, 2018

I’m not sure what tunnel he’s looking in, but he seems to be quite delighted with the fact that there were only 5.9 “opioid use disorder diagnoses” per 100,000 in 2017 compared to 6.2 in 2016. This whopping decrease (5%) could be explained by a difference in diagnostic criteria or statistical noise but if it’s even real then does a decrease of 0.3 “addicted” people (3) per 100,000 really qualify as good news when the number of those dropping dead from fentanyl is doubling every six months? 

  1. And the Department of Justice hasn’t quite figured things out, which is evident from Attorney General Jeff Sessions:

“Under this proposed new rule [which restricts the number of pills that can be made], if DEA believes that a company’s opioids are being diverted for misuse, then they will reduce the amount of opioids that company can make,” 

Jeff Session, Reuters, April 2018

So, I guess if we make fewer pills then fewer people will die from fentanyl. Which is fine except for a 25% drop in opioid prescriptions over the past five years has been accompanied by a 25-fold increase in fentanyl deaths. Yeah, that’s gonna work.

And the $64,000 question is why people like Sessions are still using the 64,000 number, even though we all know that it has virtually nothing to do with overdoses of Vicodin or Percocet. From the same article:

Approximately 64,000 Americans lost their lives to drug overdoses in 2016, the highest drug death toll and the fastest increase in that death toll in American history.Today we are facing the deadliest drug crisis in American history… “Approximately 64,000 Americans lost their lives to drug overdoses in 2016, the highest drug death toll and the fastest increase in that death toll in American history.

President Trump doesn’t seem all that familiar with the facts either.

And you have people that go to the hospital with a broken arm, and they come out and they’re addicted.  They’re addicted to painkillers, and they don’t even know what happened.  They go in for something minor, and they come out and they’re in serious shape.

Remarks by President Trump at the White House Opioids Summit, March 1, 2018

No, that is incorrect. People don’t go into the hospital and come out in serious shape because:

  1. The is plenty of literature that shows that pain patients rarely become addicted, especially in such a short timeframe.
  2. With the anti-opioid hysteria we’re now going through if you go into the hospital with a broken arm it’s not all that unlikely that you’ll be accused of breaking your own arm just to get high and sent home with Tylenol, which works as well as a Tootsie Roll.

Speaking of broken bones, who could forget what the empathetic Jeff Sessions has to say about that:

“I mean, people need to take some aspirin sometimes and tough it out a little…That’s what Gen. Kelly—you know, he’s a Marine—[he] had surgery on his hands, painful surgery. [He said,] ‘I’m not taking any drugs!’ It did hurt, though. It did hurt. A lot of people—you can get through these things.” (4)

So, the war goes on and on and on, people keep dying, and no one in our government seems to be learning anything.

Perhaps Lichtenstein will be in our sights once we get rid of Sweden. Pathetic.  

NOTES:

(1) See The CDC Quietly Admits It Screwed Up Counting Opioid Pills

(2) Data are taken from a graph and are approximate.

(3) Data consisted of Blue Cross Blue Shield members.

(4) I can’t help but wonder if Sessions would change his tune if went to an ER with an elephant tusk embedded in his rectum and was sent home with one baby aspirin.

Getting your medications thru mail order can kill ?

https://www.change.org/p/claire-mccaskill-ban-mail-order-drug-mandates-from-all-health-insurance-plans

My son, received a life saving liver transplant at the age of 2. His life depends on the potency and effectiveness of chemotherapy/immune suppression medications. In the past mail order delivered his liquid oral medications in nothing but a plastic envelope on a 102 degree day on a hot enclosed not temperature controlled UPS truck. Shortly after, he went into liver rejection which could have resulted in complete liver failure or death. I speculated that the medication could have been too weak after the delivery of medications in high heat. I vowed to never again risk his life with mail order pharmacy.

Recently, we were mandated/forced to only use mail order pharmacy in order to receive coverage for his life saving medications. Hesitant, I begged for an ice pack. The package arrived on an about 90 degree day again without an ice pack. His labs elevated again afterwards. My son wants to know, “Why would they do that?”

I contacted the manufacturer, who completes all of the testing for my son drugs who stated that both of my son’s medications should be discarded and considered less potent once stored above 86 degrees as higher temperatures and freezing could result in lower potency. I also found out that the liquid medication that the youngest children take are the most harmed by the mishandling of medications outside of the manufactures temperature storage guidelines. Our youngest of children’s lives are being threatened. 

I contacted the mail order pharmacy who refused to take replace or take back the medication. They said the law & USP Pharmacopoeia allows them to ship up to 104 degrees, although the manufacturer states it is not proven safe at these temperatures. 

I contacted the FDA, who states that the mail order pharmacy should be using the manufacturer’s guidelines that have been proven safe. Not the reference range by USP that has not tested my son’s exact medication. However since the mail order pharmacies are regulated loosley by the State Board of Pharmacy, not the FDA there was nothing that the FDA could do. 

I spoke with a UPS driver. He states temperatures on his truck are far above 104 degrees on a 90 degree day. He is mandated to keep his door closed unless getting a package. He states it gets so hot on a 90 degree day that he cannot breathe when he opens the back. 

I made over 30 calls to the insurance company begging for them to please let us pick my son’s medications up at the local pharmacy at which they are filled. My son’s physician wrote a note/appeal as his transplant team has stated that they have tried to voice their concerns about this issue with their pediatric/child patients and no one is listening! The insurance company still denied the doctor’s appeal for us to pick up my son’s medications in the safest way. It was not until the Media became evolved that the insurance company budged. 

I felt helpless and have untied with many other pharmacist, physicians, patients, mothers and fathers, and caregivers who feel the same way. Helpless.

Mail order of prescription drugs should be a choice not the only option of coverage. Mandatory mail order programs from all plan types (INCLUDING the plans that are regulated by ERISA) needs to cease until mail order pharmacies are forced to store and monitor medications during their deliveries at the temperatures tested and proven safe by the manufacturer. I would never put my son’s medications in a hot non-temperature controlled environment, and shoudn’t be forced to only use this option in order to get coverage for his life saving medications.

Mail order pharmacies may appear to save money, but when my son ended up in the hosptial after taking medications that could have been compromised by having lower potency, the cost of the rejection was thousands of dollars. If his liver would have fully failed, the cost of his liver transplant for just 5 days (he was in the hospital for 5 weeks) was over $1,000,000. The lax regulation and oversight may save money on prescription drug plans, but may come at an increased cost to the health plan itself. Also, keep in mind the endless waste of medications that automatically are sent regardless of whether or not patients need them.

Also, people with chronic, complex conditions, should always have the option of face to face interaction with a pharmacist who knows their complex needs and medical history. Could you imagine being required to go to a different doctor every time you needed medical care for you or your family? The pharmacist and patient relationship is crucial to the successful outcome of the patient’s overall health. Taking this away is harmful to patients and be more costly to our already stressed healthcare system.

Another important fact. Mandatory mail order programs are discriminatory. It is estimated that 40% of our homeless are disabled. How is mandatory mail order fair and working for them as they may not have an address and not even know where they will be from day to day?

We need legislation to protect all patients by ending the mandatory mail order pharmacy coverage in every type of plan offered in the nation.  We need your help to make mandatory mail order an option not a mandate.

asked to pass this along – 07/16/2018

: Chronic pain patients in Maine?

Hello – I wrote Gordon Smith, director of the Maine Medical Association, regarding my concerns with the Maine state law restricting dosage of opioid prescriptions. I don’t live in Maine, but he offered to publish a 600-word article in Maine Medicine from the chronic pain patient point of view. I just need to find someone who actually lives in Maine to write it. 

Would you pass this along to any of your members in Maine who might be interested?
His email says “I am sorry that you have suffered under the Maine law. In our presentations to prescribers and occasionally to the public we always acknowledge that a group of patients has suffered, although many have been assisted.  It is important that policy makers do hear your point of view.  If you would like to submit a 600 word article I would make every effort to include it in our upcoming issue of Maine Medicine. Feel free to forward my offer to patients in Maine in similar circumstances.”

 

Gordon Smith, Esq.

Executive Vice President

Maine Medical Association

gsmith@mainemed.com

Opioid Treatment 10-year Longevity Survey Final Report

Opioid Treatment 10-year Longevity Survey Final Report

https://www.practicalpainmanagement.com/treatments/pharmacological/opioids/opioid-treatment-10-year-longevity-survey-final-report

Patients in this study were found to be functioning quite well after 10 or more years on generally stable opioid dosages—with the vast majority able to care for themselves and even drive.

About eighteen months ago, I approached the publisher of Practical Pain Management to assist in a survey of long-term, opioid-treated pain patients. Rightly, as any good publisher, he asked why should I go to the time and expense to do a longevity survey? I then presented him my laundry list of reasons for doing the survey. Some explanations of my reasons for doing this survey are given here. Quite frankly this survey was needed, since we simply have little data on opioid long-term treatment.1,2 Also, opioid treatment is constantly under attack, so it seems logical to see if the popularity of this treatment is justified.

Reasons for the Survey

First, recall that we have just finished the “Decade of Pain.” Ushering in this decade were many laws, regulations, and guidelines—promulgated in many states—that encouraged physicians to prescribe opioids without fear of legal reprisal. Did anyone get help this decade? Did this political and humanitarian effort pay off?

Secondly, my own experience in practice was the predominant factor. I started my pain practice in 1975 while serving as a Public Health Physician in East Los Angeles County. Cancer and post-polio patients needed ‘narcotics’ (the common name prior to the more correct usage ‘opioids’) treatment for their severe chronic pain. I’ve now followed some chronic pain patients still taking opioids after 25 to 30 years.1 Also, I was a government consultant in the 1970s on Howard Hughes who managed to survive 30 years with intractable pain after a 1946 plane crash. His average opioid dosage over that time period was about 200 mg of morphine equivalence. But are my patients unusual or simply responsive to an overzealous clinician? Do opioid-treated patients in the hands of other physicians do just as well over a long period?

A little over a year ago there was another reason to do a longevity survey. At that time there was a vitriolic, anti-opioid propaganda campaign being waged. Some prominent academic institutions, pharmaceutical companies, professional organizations, and journals, almost in unison, essentially claimed that opioids shouldn’t be prescribed due to hyperalgesia or other as-yet unnamed complications. Some parties stated that opioids, if prescribed at all, should have a dosage restricted to some arbitrary number such as 200mg of morphine equivalence a day. Some claims fundamentally suggested that pain should only be treated with non-opioids, because opioids actually “cause pain.” Amazingly, some detoxification centers actually advertised for “clients” on the basis that the person’s pain would be cured if the patient spent $10K or $20K to detoxify from opioids. Needless to say, the anti-opioid campaign was hardly backed by bonafide medical management pain practitioners or scientific studies. So what was needed was a simple survey to see if there are long-term opioid-treated patients who are still doing well.

What the Survey Can’t Determine

This survey was not intended or designed to answer some ancillary questions. Not answered is which opioids are superior or could patients have done as well without opioids? Also, it wasn’t intended to determine optimal dosage or complications. The intent was clear and simple: Do some opioid-treated patients improve pain control, function better, and enhance their quality of life over a 10-year period?

Survey Methods

In early 2009, an advertisement was placed in this publication to identify any physician who had a cohort of chronic pain patients they had treated with opioids for 10 or more years and were willing to share outcome data. Three physicians, one each from Kentucky, Louisiana, and California, reported a total of 76 patients who have been treated with opioids for 10 or more years. These, together with the 24 patients treated by this author,1 provide a cohort of 100 patients who have been treated with opioids for 10 or more years and serve as subjects for this survey. Physicians completed a survey questionnaire for each patient that inquired about demographic status, cause of pain, opioids currently used, basic physical functions, activities of daily living, and stability of opioid dosage.

Results and Findings

Patients in this study appeared typical of most chronic pain patients in that they are primarily middle age or older and have degenerative diseases of the spine, joints, or peripheral nerves (see Tables 1 and 2). Most have maintained on one opioid, although some patients required two or three. The majority have been on stable dosages for many years (see Table 3). Despite the longevity of treatment, most function quite well. The vast majority of patients report good function in that they can dress, read, attend social functions, drive, and ambulate without assistance (see Table 4). Almost half (45%) reported they had been on a stable opioid dosage for at least 3 years.

Opioid Treatment 10-year Longevity Survey Final Report

Patients in this study were found to be functioning quite well after 10 or more years on generally stable opioid dosages—with the vast majority able to care for themselves and even drive.
Page 2 of 2
Table 1. Demographics of 10-Year Opioid Patients
Age (Yrs) Range 30-83
Males 61 (61%)
Females 39 (39%)
Length of time in opioid treatment 10 – 35 yrs
Stable opioid dosage without significant escalation 3mos – 31 yrs
Table 2. Causes of Chronic Pain in This Population (N=100)
Spine disease 51
Arthritis 16
Peripheral neuropathy 14
Headache 10
Knee diseases 5
Abdominal adhesions 5
Hip diseases 4
Shoulder/arm diseases 4
Fibromyalgia 4
113*
*Adds up to more than 100 as some patients had more than 1 diagnosis.
Table 3. Opioids Currently Used by These 100 Patients
No. of Opioids Currently Used N(%)
1 62
2 26
3 12
Opioids Currently Used
Hydrocodone 56
Oxycodone 25
Fentanyl 15
Morphine 13
Methadone 8
Propoxyphene 8
Hydromorphone 5
Other 6
Table 4. Activities and Functions in These 10-Year+ Opioid Patients (N=100)
N(%)
Dress without assistance 82
Attend church/social events 89
Read newspapers, books, magazines 97
Gainful employment 25
Care for family 61
Ambulate unassisted 85
Ambulate with cane 5
Drive a car 74

Discussion

Recent epidemiologic studies indicate that about 10 million Americans now take opioid drugs for chronic pain control. This relatively recent and dramatic occurrence has had little outcome study.1,2 The author recently reported 24 Southern California chronic pain patients who were treated with opioids over 10 years and who had positive social, physical, and functional results.1 Outcomes from other patients treated by other physicians in other geographic areas were needed to confirm or deny the positive outcomes found with one physician in one geographic area. As stated above, this survey was not intended and doesn’t imply that there are patients who may have done as well or better if treated differently. Also this survey does not include patients who did not respond to opioids or stopped them due to complications.

This survey doesn’t lay claim to any sophisticated epidemiogic methodology or randomization. All this survey intended to do was meet one fundamental goal: “Are there chronic pain patients in the United States who have taken opioids over 10 years and report less pain, better function and have a better quality of life?” This survey satisfies this simple goal.

Conclusion

Patients reported here are functioning quite well after 10 or more years in opioid treatment. The vast majority can care for themselves and even drive. Opioid dosages have generally remained stable for long periods without significant escalation. Given the findings here, there is no obvious reason to discourage opioid use or encourage pain patients to cease opioids.

Surgeon General talks new campaign to combat opioid crisis

Interesting… both members of the Trump administration in this interview have family/friends that have/had trouble with substance abuse. So it would appear that you get a interview with a myopic view of people abusing some substance that they have chosen to SELF-MEDICATE the monkeys on their backs and/or demons in their heads

Patients With Chronic Pain Feel Caught In An Opioid Prescribing Debate

Patients With Chronic Pain Feel Caught In An Opioid Prescribing Debate

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/07/08/622729300/patients-with-chronic-pain-feel-caught-in-an-opioid-prescribing-debate

It started with a rolled ankle during a routine training exercise.

Shannon Hubbard never imagined it was the prologue to one of the most debilitating pain conditions known to exist, called ­­­­­­­complex regional pain syndrome.

It’s a condition that causes the nervous system to go haywire, creating pain disproportionate to the actual injury. It can also affect how the body regulates temperature and blood flow.

For Hubbard, it manifested several years ago following surgery on her foot. That’s a common way for it to take hold.

“My leg feels like it’s on fire pretty much all the time. It spreads to different parts of your body,” the 47-year-old Army veteran says.

Hubbard props up her leg, careful not to graze it against the kitchen table in her home east of Phoenix. It’s red and swollen, still scarred from an ulcer that landed her in the hospital a few months ago.

“That started as a little blister and four days later it was like the size of a baseball,” she says. “They had to cut it open and then it got infected and because I have blood flow issues, it doesn’t heal.”

She knows that soon it will happen again.

“Over the past three years, I’ve been prescribed over sixty different medications and combinations, none have even touched the pain,” she says.

She holds up a plastic bag filled with discarded pill bottles — evidence of her elusive search for a solution to the pain.

Hubbard says she’s had injections and even traveled across the country for infusions of ketamine, an anesthetic which can be used for pain in extreme cases. Her doctors have discussed amputating her leg because of the frequency of the infections.

“I’ve tried the other treatments. All I can do is manage the pain,” she says. “Opioids have become the best solution.”

For about nine months, Hubbard was on a combination of short- and long-acting opioids. She says it gave her enough relief to start leaving the house again and do physical therapy.

But in April that changed.

At her monthly appointment, her pain doctor informed her the dose was being lowered.

“They told me because of the new Arizona law they had to cut me back,” she says. “They had to take one of the pills away. That had a huge impact on my pain.”

Hubbard knew about those rules. They’re part of the state’s new opioid law, which places restrictions on prescribing and limits the maximum dose for most patients. She also knew the law wasn’t supposed to affect her — an existing patient with chronic pain.

Hubbard argued with the doctor, without success.

“They didn’t indicate there was any medical reason for cutting me back. It was simply because of the pressure of the opioid rules.”

Hubbard’s dose was lowered from 100 morphine milligram equivalents daily (MME) to 90, the highest dose allowed for many new patients in Arizona.

She says her pain has been “terrible” since they lowered her dose.

“It just hurts, I don’t want to walk, I don’t want to … pretty much don’t’ want to do anything,” she says.

Hubbard’s condition may be extreme, but her situation isn’t unique.

Faced with skyrocketing drug overdoses, states are cracking down on opioid prescribing. Increasingly, some patients with chronic pain like Hubbard say they are becoming collateral damage.

New limits on prescribing

More than two dozen states have implemented laws or policies limiting opioid prescriptions in some way. The most common is to restrict a patient’s first prescription to a number of pills that should last a week or less. But some states like Arizona have gone further by placing a ceiling on the maximum dose for most patients.

The Arizona Opioid Epidemic Act was passed earlier this year with unanimous support.

The law was the culmination of months of outreach and planning by state health officials.

It started in June of 2017, when Arizona’s Republican Governor Doug Ducey declared a public health emergency, citing new data, showing that two people were dying every day in the state from opioid overdoses.

He’s pledged to come after those responsible for the rising death toll.

“All bad actors will be held accountable — whether they are doctors, manufacturers or just plain drug dealers,” Ducey said in his annual State of the State address, in early January 2018.

The Governor went on to cite statistics from one rural county where four doctors prescribed six million pills in a single year, concluding “something has gone terribly, terribly wrong.”

Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey’s moves against opioid over-prescribing initially faced resistance from the state’s medical associations.

Will Stone/KJZZ

Later in January, Ducey called a special session of the Arizona legislature and in less than a week he signed the Arizona Opioid Epidemic Act into law. He called it the “most comprehensive and thoughtful package any state has passed to address this issue and crisis to date.”

The law expands access to addiction treatment, ramps up oversight of prescribing and protects drug users who call 911 to report an overdose from prosecution, among other things.

Initially, Arizona’s major medical associations cautioned against what they saw as too much interference in clinical practice, especially since opioid prescriptions were already on the decline.

Gov. Ducey’s administration offered assurances that the law would “maintain access for chronic pain sufferers and others who rely on these drugs.” Restrictions would apply only to new patients. Cancer, trauma, end-of-life and other serious cases were exempted. Ultimately, the medical establishment came out in favor of the law, which passed unanimously.

Pressure on doctors

Since the passage of the law, some doctors in Arizona report feeling pressure to lower patient doses, even for patients who have been on stable regimens of opioids for years without trouble.

Dr. Julian Grove knows the nuances of Arizona’s new law better than most physicians. A pain doctor, Grove worked with the state on the prescribing rules in the new law.

“We moved the needle to a degree so that many patients wouldn’t be as severely affected,” says Grove who’s also president of the Arizona Pain Society. “But I’ll be the first to say this has certainly caused a lot of patients problems, anxiety,” he says.

“Many people who are prescribing medications have moved to a much more conservative stance and unfortunately pain patients are being negatively affected.”

Like many states, Arizona has looked to its prescription monitoring program as a key tool for tracking overprescribing. State law requires prescribers to check the online database. Report cards are sent out comparing each prescriber to the rest of their cohort. Clinicians consider their scores when deciding how to manage patients’ care, Grove says.

“A lot of practitioners are reducing opioid medications, not from a clinical perspective, but more from a legal and regulatory perspective for fear of investigation,” Grove says. “No practitioner wants to be the highest prescriber.”

Julian Grove, MD, a pain specialist, says that doctors were already facing pressure on many fronts to reduce treatment by opioids in Arizona.

Will Stone/KJZZ

Arizona’s new prescribing rules don’t apply to board-certified pain specialists like Grove, who are trained to care for patients with complex chronic pain.

But, says Grove, the reality is that doctors — even pain specialists — were already facing pressure on many fronts to curtail opioids — from the Drug Enforcement Agency to health insurers down to state medical boards.

The new state law has only made the reduction of opioids “more fast and furious,” he says.

Grove traces the hypervigilance back to guidelines put out by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2016. The CDC spelled out the risks associated with higher doses of opioids and advised clinicians when starting a patient on opioids to prescribe the lowest effective dosage.

“They have been grossly misinterpreted,” says psychiatrist Sally Satel.

Satel, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, says those guidelines stipulated the decision to lower a patient’s dose should be decided on a case-by-case basis, not by means of a blanket policy.

The guidelines were not intended for pain specialists, but rather for primary care physicians, a group that accounted for nearly half of all opioids dispensed between 2007 and 2012.

“There is no mandate to reduce doses on people who have been doing well,” Satel says.

She says in the rush to address the nation’s opioid overdose crisis the CDC’s guidelines have become the model for many regulators and state legislatures.

“It’s a very, very unhealthy, deeply chilled environment in which doctors and patients who have chronic pain can no longer work together,” she says.

Satel calls the notion that new prescribing laws will reverse the tide of drug overdose deaths “misguided.”

“They are often looked to as a strategy that can make an enormous impact on the problem, and that is not true,” she says.

In fact, the rate of opioid prescribing nationally has declined in recent years, though it still soars above the levels of the 1990s. Meanwhile, more people are dying from illicit drugs like heroin and fentanyl than prescription opioids.

In Arizona, more than 1,300 people have died from opioid-related overdoses since June of last year, according to preliminary state numbers. Only a third of those deaths involved just a prescription painkiller.

Heroin is now almost as common as oxycodone in overdose cases in Arizona.

A range of views

Some physicians are supportive of the new rules, according to Pete Wertheim, executive director of the Arizona Osteopathic Medical Association.

“For some, it has been a welcome relief.” he says. “They feel like it has given them an avenue, a means to confront patients.” Some doctors tell him it’s an opportunity to have a tough conversation with patients who they believe are at risk for addiction or overdose because of the medication.

The organization is striving to educate its members about Arizona’s prescribing rules and the exemptions. But he says most doctors now feel like the message is clear: “we don’t want you prescribing opioids.”

Long before the law passed, Wertheim said physicians were already telling him that they had stopped prescribing, because they “didn’t want the liability.”

He worries the current climate around prescribing will drive doctors out of pain management, especially in rural areas.

There’s also a fear that the current climate will push some patients who can’t get prescription pills to try stronger street drugs, says Dr. Gerald Harris II, an addiction treatment specialist in Glendale, Ariz.

He says he’s seen an increase in referrals from doctors concerned that their patients with chronic pain are addicted to opioids.

Harris also receives new patients — almost daily, he says — whose doctors have stopped prescribing altogether.

“Their doctor is afraid and he’s cut them off,” he says. “Unfortunately, a great many patients turn to street heroin and other drugs to self-medicate because they couldn’t get the medications they need.”

Gerald Harris II, DO, specializes in treating addiction in Glendale, Az. He says he’s seen an increase in referrals from doctors concerned that their patients with chronic pain are addicted to opioids.

Will Stone/KJZZ

Arizona’s Department of Health Services is working to reassure providers and dispel the myths, according to Dr. Cara Christ, who heads the agency and helped design the state’s opioid response. She points to the recently launched Opioid Assistance and Referral Line created to help health care providers with complex cases. The state has also released a set of detailed prescribing guidelines for doctors.

Christ characterizes this as an “adjustment period” while doctors learn the new rules.

“The intent was never to stop prescribers from utilizing opioids,” she says. “It’s really meant to prevent a future generation from developing opioid use disorder, while not impacting current chronic pain patients.”

Christ says she just hasn’t heard of many patients losing access to medicine.

It’s still too early to gauge the law’s success, she says, but opioid prescriptions continue to go down in Arizona.

Arizona saw a 33 percent reduction in the number of opioid prescriptions in April, as compared to the same period last year, according to state data. Christ’s agency reports more people are also getting help for addiction. There has been about a 40 percent increase in hospitals referring patients for behavioral health treatment following an overdose.

Shannon Hubbard, the woman living complex regional pain syndrome, considers herself fortunate that her doctors didn’t cut back her painkiller dose even more.

“I’m actually kind of lucky that I have such a severe case because at least they can’t say I’m crazy or it’s in my head,” she says.

Hubbard is well aware that people are dying everyday from opioids. One of her family members struggles with heroin addiction and she’s helping raise his daughter. But she’s adamant that there’s a better way to address the crisis.

“What they are doing is not working. They are having no effect on the guy who is on the street shooting heroin and is really in danger of overdosing.” she says.

“Instead they are hurting people that are actually helped by the drugs.”

FDA joins 22 countries’ recall of common heart drug

FDA joins 22 countries’ recall of common heart drug

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/13/health/valsartan-recall-fda-bn/index.html

(CNN)A common drug used to control blood pressure and help prevent heart failure was announced by the US Food and Drug Administration on Friday, a week after 22 other countries recalled it because the drug contains a chemical that poses a potential cancer risk.

Valsartan is off patent and is used as a component of other generic medicines, but not all medicines containing the ingredient are involved, according to the FDA. The US recall includes the the versions of valsartan that are made by Major Pharmaceuticals, Solco Healthcare and Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. as well as valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) sold by Solco Healthcare and Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd.
“We have carefully assessed the valsartan-containing medications sold in the United States, and we’ve found that the valsartan sold by these specific companies does not meet our safety standards. This is why we’ve asked these companies to take immediate action to protect patients,” said Dr. Janet Woodcock, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
In Europe and Asia, Novartis, the company that originally developed the drug, said Sandoz valsartan and valsartan/HCT film-coated tablets are being recalled because they “do not meet our high quality standards.” Pharmacies in the UK are advised to recall valsartan batches containing medicines made by Dexcel Pharma Ltd and Accord Healthcare.
The recall is due to the presence of the impurity, N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), which was found in the recalled products, according to an FDA statement.
NDMA is an organic chemical that is in a family of potent carcinogens. It has been used to make liquid rocket fuel, softeners and lubricants, among other products. It can also be unintentionally produced through certain chemical reactions and is a byproduct from some pesticide manufacturing, the making of rubber tires or fish processing.
Animal studies have shown that NDMA can be toxic and cause tumors in the liver, kidney and respiratory tract. It can also be potentially harmful to humans in certain quantities. Exposure to high levels can cause liver damage and is a probable human carcinogen, according to the US Department of Health and Human Services.
Novartis spokesman Eric Althoff said after the initial recall last week that products sold in the US were not affected by this recall, but the FDA’s ongoing review and laboratory tests found otherwise. “The presence of of NDMA was unexpected and is thought to be related to changes in the way the active substance was manufactured,” the FDA release said.
“The amounts of NDMA found in Valsartan API are much lower than the cumulative endogenous production and usual external exposure of NDMA,” Althoff wrote in an email July 6. “There is no certainty as to how much this contaminant may potentially increase cancer risk in humans. Thus, the amount of NDMA found in the Valsartan API would not represent a significantly increased risk to the patients taking of Sandoz Valsartan and Sandoz Valsartan HCT Film coated tablets.”
The FDA’s investigation into the drug will continue.
Follow CNN Health on Facebook and Twitter

See the latest news and share your comments with CNN Health on Facebook and Twitter.

“The FDA is committed to maintaining our gold standard for safety and efficacy. That includes our efforts to ensure the quality of drugs and the safe manner in which they’re manufactured,” Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb said Friday. “When we identify lapses in the quality of drugs and problems with their manufacturing that have the potential to create risks to patients, we’re committed to taking swift action to alert the public and help facilitate the removal of the products from the market. As we seek the removal of certain drug products today, our drug shortages team is also working hard to ensure patients’ therapeutic needs are met in the United States with an adequate supply of unaffected medications.”
Patients are advised to talk to their doctor if they are taking the medication. They should not discontinue taking medication without a doctor’s permission. Going off their medication without supervision could be dangerous, according to the American Heart Association.

NV: opiate dosing guidelines — what could go wrong ?

 

 

 

Woman shoots herself in back to alleviate pain

ROBINSON, TX (KXXV) –

A woman was taken to the hospital Friday morning after a shooting in Robinson. 

Robinson police were on the scene in the 600 block of Karnes Drive in Robinson. Police said that a 76-year-old woman had shot herself in the back after experiencing chronic pain that she could no longer tolerate. 

The woman was found in the driveway with a gunshot wound to the right hip. She told officers that she hoped that now she could experience relief from the back pain.