Audit report raises concerns with effectiveness of prescription drug registry

Audit report raises concerns with effectiveness of prescription drug registry

https://helenair.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/audit-report-raises-concerns-with-effectiveness-of-prescription-drug-registry/article_b406cb8f-f2d9-5885-8f5f-92669f47a180.html

An audit of the state’s prescription drug registry found several issues that hinder the system, making it not as useful as it could be in identifying misuse and abuse of prescribed medications.

Auditors found indications of doctor and pharmacy shopping, including one person who filled nine prescriptions in a 30-day window at four different pharmacies.

They also found more than 1,000 likely incorrect birth dates for people in the system, and prescribers writing prescriptions without licenses, though representatives with the state Board of Pharmacy said auditors didn’t take into account everything that could have led to their findings.

The Montana Prescription Drug Registry went into effect in 2012. It is administered by the Board of Pharmacy, which is under the Montana Department of Labor and Industry. The cost for the registry over the last seven years has been about $1.8 million, and it’s now primarily funded by fees paid by prescribers and pharmacists.

The registry tracks medications that are prescribed and dispensed within the state or to Montana residents. It had been voluntary until the most recent state Legislature passed a bill to require every person who is licensed to prescribe or dispense prescription drugs to register. That takes effect this fall. Previously, the registry had been used by about 54% of those who were eligible.

The registry is mainly used by medical providers and pharmacists to search a patient’s medical history to learn about their past and current prescriptions. It has a secondary use by law enforcement officers, who obtain subpoenas.

The registry could also be used to flag people who are shopping around for multiple doctors and pharmacies in order to obtain and potentially misuse or divert medications.

Auditors, however, found the Board of Pharmacy does not review or analyze the data in the registry to find those potential abuses. State law allows for that type of proactive use, but does not require it.

The system instead relies on doctors and pharmacists to “make their own conclusions” about a patient’s records, according to the audit.

Auditors tended to qualify their findings in the report by saying that other problems within the registry — such as a lack of oversight or review of the accuracy of information put into the system — could skew outcomes.

Still, they raised concerns about records showing 4,410 patients who went to four or more pharmacies or prescribers in a 30-day window, and 8,814 who did the same in a 60-day period. That type of behavior could indicate doctor or pharmacy shopping to misuse or abuse prescription drugs.

In one example, a patient got nine prescriptions for high-strength opioids from four doctors in a 30-day window, and filled the prescriptions at four different pharmacies in Kalispell, Helena, Spokane and Whitefish. In a single day, the person had two prescriptions written for OxyContin from two different doctors.

In another case, a person got 11 prescriptions from nine prescribers in a 30-day stretch and filled them at five pharmacies.

Auditors also found concerns with missing and nonsensical data, as well as inconsistencies in data reporting. The department disputed some of how auditors interpret their findings.

In some cases, the auditors found more than 1,000 dates of birth for patients in the registry that were “unreasonable.” Four records had dates listed in the future, 231 had invalid dates like 01/01/0001, 50 had birthdays before 1900 and the rest had dates before 1912, which the auditors found unlikely to be accurate.

Marcie Bough, executive officer of the Board of Pharmacy, told lawmakers on the Legislative Audit Committee that met Tuesday not all those incorrect dates represent something wrong. Pharmacists, Bough said, would use nonsensical birth dates for things like animal prescriptions, which can be distributed from regular pharmacies.

3 Responses

  1. Yep. The Montana Board of Medicine expects perfection when they sanction doctors for record keeping. Can’t manage their own, though. And
    The Board of Pharmacy has ignored feedback on this system since it began. I had one patient with three different entries.
    You had to know which ones to enter,
    Based on nicknames
    Or
    Middle names or middle initial.
    Really really dumb.
    They didn’t like hearing my feedback, made no corrections, and here we are.

  2. From what I have been told by the Oregon PDMP, is that there are only two main competing service companies for these systems. There were many issues with the one system and Oregon changed to the other. That has not fixed all the mistakes and believe me there are a lot of them, but it has been better than before. I still see prescriptions failing to show up on the PDMP 28 days and more after they were filled — state law requires them to be posted within 72 hours. The Oregon Board of Pharmacy fails to hold any pharmacy accountable to the letter of the law. The PDMP claims it is not in their mandate to take any actions. So basically no one is too blame for the errors, EXCEPT the doctors who then write prescriptions based on flawed or missing data! I have seen names wrong (nick names used instead of legal names), wrong addresses, wrong prescriptions, wrong written dates, wrong calculated MED values, failing to note the name of the prescriber (I have seen multiple cases where OHSU has been named as the prescriber — when can an institution write a prescription? There had to be a person writing that prescription, but somehow the pharmacy or the PDMP allows that person to hide from accountability? So many mistakes over so many years! So little change to correct them and no true investigations by the Oregon Board of Pharmacy! I use the system everyday in my practice despite all the errors. But given that no law requires others to use it, too many patients and poor prescribers are falling through the cracks that are as wide as a dam breach. Too many prescribers are just too damn lazy to use the system. Until they are fined for a failure to use it before writing that controlled substance prescription, things will never really change.

    • Dr George;
      “no one is too blame for the errors…” Gee, that sounds like everything involved in the regulation of the Oregon medical rules…i.e. the Chronic Pain Task Farce, & every other thing run by OHA (where there is no one to bring problems to except the person who appointed the people that are making the problems or have the conflicts of interest in the first place).

      Gotta love a state that is MUCH more willing to prescribe opiates for suicide “death with dignity”) than for crippling, permanent pain (that’d be “life with dignity, and who the heck cares about that?).

      Tho I’m not sure many other states are much better these days.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from PHARMACIST STEVE

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading